|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On August 28 2012 07:29 Bibbit wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2012 07:07 Promethelax wrote:On August 28 2012 04:14 KwarK wrote:Thanks for drawing that to my attention. uh-oh. Bans incoming. I think he just said that because Praetorial linked (drew attention to) a post he made in there that he got himself banned for ^^
oh, possible. Well, in that case ban incoming. (incame? What is the past tense of incoming?)
|
On August 28 2012 07:30 Promethelax wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2012 07:29 Bibbit wrote:On August 28 2012 07:07 Promethelax wrote:On August 28 2012 04:14 KwarK wrote:Thanks for drawing that to my attention. uh-oh. Bans incoming. I think he just said that because Praetorial linked (drew attention to) a post he made in there that he got himself banned for ^^ oh, possible. Well, in that case ban incoming. (incame? What is the past tense of incoming?) ban hath cometh
|
The "What is Rape?" thread wins the award for best ban magnet of the year.
|
On August 28 2012 08:23 Chriscras wrote: The "What is Rape?" thread wins the award for best ban magnet of the year.
It's only August.
|
|
I wonder how long that final poster on there is going to last.
|
Why do people go into a thread thats specifically made to tell people they shouldnt blatantly advertise, and then advertise? It blows my mind
|
On August 28 2012 08:52 solidbebe wrote: Why do people go into a thread thats specifically made to tell people they shouldnt blatantly advertise, and then advertise? It blows my mind It's the title. People see the title that doesnt super explicitly state the purpose of the thread, don't read anything (I mean they just want to advertise, they dont really care about the community or anything), then go "Oh! That's me!"
|
Oh man I am laughing so hard about that thread right now. Unfortunately it dates back to 2010 so it cannot qualify for the 2012 Ban Magnet of the Year award. :'(
That being said, I don't even think you can call it a ban magnet... Destiny's vulgar name for using floating units to draw out entrenched enemies would probably be more apt.
|
On August 28 2012 01:05 Christ the Redeemer wrote: I thought I might contribute to this wonderful thread.
John 3:16 For God so loved the world,that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.
Galatians 5:13 For you were called to freedom, brothers. Only do not use your freedom as an opportunity for the flesh, but through love serve one another.
1 Corinthians 13:4-8 Love is patient and kind; love does not envy or boast; it is not arrogant or rude. It does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable or resentful; it does not rejoice at wrongdoing, but rejoices with the truth. Love bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things. Love never ends. As for prophecies, they will pass away; as for tongues, they will cease; as for knowledge, it will pass away.
Go and enjoy love, brother.
User was temp banned for this post. It's funny that I'm about to defend this post because I almost reported it myself, but the reason I didn't is because it is CTR's definition of love in a thread that is discussing the definition of love.
However he only has 35 posts and I think 90% of them are scripture. If that's the case he should permed/30 day-ed. Edit: v Thanks. Yeah, he deserved the ban.
|
United States10328 Posts
On August 28 2012 09:53 McFeser wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2012 01:05 Christ the Redeemer wrote: I thought I might contribute to this wonderful thread.
John 3:16 For God so loved the world,that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.
Galatians 5:13 For you were called to freedom, brothers. Only do not use your freedom as an opportunity for the flesh, but through love serve one another.
1 Corinthians 13:4-8 Love is patient and kind; love does not envy or boast; it is not arrogant or rude. It does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable or resentful; it does not rejoice at wrongdoing, but rejoices with the truth. Love bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things. Love never ends. As for prophecies, they will pass away; as for tongues, they will cease; as for knowledge, it will pass away.
Go and enjoy love, brother.
User was temp banned for this post. It's funny that I'm about to defend this post because I almost reported it myself, but the reason I didn't is because it is CTR's definition of love in a thread that is discussing the definition of love. However he only has 35 posts and I think 90% of them are scripture. If that's the case he should permed/30 day-ed.
posted earlier:
On August 28 2012 04:06 KwarK wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2012 03:52 ]343[ wrote:On August 28 2012 03:44 Praetorial wrote:http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=363774¤tpage=3#60 Christ the Redeemer was just temp banned for 2 days by KwarK.
That account was created on 2012-05-06 11:50:04 and had 35 posts.
Reason: Stop doing that.
This guy is moderately annoying, but honestly I wonder how many people get the reference in his name(hint: it's a big stone thing) wait, why is that even banworthy? It seems pretty on-topic to me... I took a look at his post history, he keeps posting only scripture in general forum topics. Furthermore he has a prior warning not to do it. Without either of those I'd have let it pass but someone who just goes into a topic, spouts some scripture and leaves again is a recipe for derailment and religious arguments. As with most bans which don't immediately make sense, there's more here to the moderator decision than you probably realise.
|
God that was the longest 2 days i ever experienced but TheToast what the heck happened to him and what was his orginal post that got him banned? Plus
Godwrath was just temp banned for 2 days by Empyrean.
That account was created on 2012-08-09 21:50:24 and had 469 posts.
Reason: No martyring on TL, please.
Reasonable post though.
When people will learn not to maryr lol..
|
Quick question mods, my memory may be fuzzy, but I notice a lot of temp bans for pages and pages, and two years ago when the beta was out, there seemed to be a lot more perma bans? Are the mods getting more lenient with their bans or is my memory just awful?
|
On August 28 2012 11:11 Shiragaku wrote: Quick question mods, my memory may be fuzzy, but I notice a lot of temp bans for pages and pages, and two years ago when the beta was out, there seemed to be a lot more perma bans? Are the mods getting more lenient with their bans or is my memory just awful? There was a recent ban orgy in the rape thread. The recent Kespa/GOM stuff and MLG has also brought out quite a few perms.
|
On August 28 2012 12:01 Heh_ wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2012 11:11 Shiragaku wrote: Quick question mods, my memory may be fuzzy, but I notice a lot of temp bans for pages and pages, and two years ago when the beta was out, there seemed to be a lot more perma bans? Are the mods getting more lenient with their bans or is my memory just awful? There was a recent ban orgy in the rape thread. The recent Kespa/GOM stuff and MLG has also brought out quite a few perms. Brilliant demonstration of the potentials of English good sir
|
On August 28 2012 12:06 Shady Sands wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2012 12:01 Heh_ wrote:On August 28 2012 11:11 Shiragaku wrote: Quick question mods, my memory may be fuzzy, but I notice a lot of temp bans for pages and pages, and two years ago when the beta was out, there seemed to be a lot more perma bans? Are the mods getting more lenient with their bans or is my memory just awful? There was a recent ban orgy in the rape thread. The recent Kespa/GOM stuff and MLG has also brought out quite a few perms. Brilliant demonstration of the potentials of English good sir English is cool. It's quite fun to make puns out of bans. Damn it almost rhymed.
|
On August 28 2012 12:01 Heh_ wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2012 11:11 Shiragaku wrote: Quick question mods, my memory may be fuzzy, but I notice a lot of temp bans for pages and pages, and two years ago when the beta was out, there seemed to be a lot more perma bans? Are the mods getting more lenient with their bans or is my memory just awful? There was a recent ban orgy in the rape thread. The recent Kespa/GOM stuff and MLG has also brought out quite a few perms.
I see what you did there. Otherwise, only one since yesterday, it seems.... I was wrong about my prediction for that thread, by the way: it's past Sunday and still up. T_T Lol, oh well.
|
On August 28 2012 12:06 Shady Sands wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2012 12:01 Heh_ wrote:On August 28 2012 11:11 Shiragaku wrote: Quick question mods, my memory may be fuzzy, but I notice a lot of temp bans for pages and pages, and two years ago when the beta was out, there seemed to be a lot more perma bans? Are the mods getting more lenient with their bans or is my memory just awful? There was a recent ban orgy in the rape thread. The recent Kespa/GOM stuff and MLG has also brought out quite a few perms. Brilliant demonstration of the potentials of English good sir Have you honestly posted 600 times in the past week, rofl.
During beta Hot_Bid i believe made a post that he would give 1 person per page a beta key and the rest would all be banned.
he got aloooooooooooot of people with that
|
Doing my level best not to comment in the Shootings in the US thread. Surprised there aren't any bans there as of now. Have the mods just not hit it yet? 'Cause some of those comments look a little ban-worthy....
|
ALLEYCAT BLUES49496 Posts
Praetorial was just temp banned for 2 days by KwarK.
That account was created on 2011-05-31 05:27:48 and had 2222 posts.
Reason: Your moderation history explicitly includes an instruction for you to not make shitty posts in topics just because you think they've gone off topic or need closing.
he stays banned more often than not.
can we start treating him like a trash poster...:/
|
|
|
|