EPTreddit on the other hand...
Ask TL Staff Anything - Page 192
| Forum Index > TL Community |
Please, if you are not staff, don't answer questions in this thread, even if you think you know the answer. Also, please take complains about bans, question about TL as a site, etc to the Website Feedback Forum. | ||
tofucake
Hyrule19228 Posts
reddit on the other hand... | ||
|
cruxArked
United States5 Posts
| ||
|
tofucake
Hyrule19228 Posts
SC2 is harder because if you lose a big battle...you're done, whereas in BW you can still recover. Also there's an ever changing strategy trend; what's viable today might be useless tomorrow. But BW is harder because there's more complexity in army compositions, positioning, high ground advantages, no MBS, no automine, 12 per control group, etc | ||
Ares[Effort]
DEMACIA6550 Posts
| ||
|
EvilTeletubby
Baltimore, USA22259 Posts
Mechanics-wise, there is no comparison. BW has been more 'figured out' in terms of timings/builds, but that is more of an apples to oranges comparison since BW has been out much longer, and relatively speaking, BW took significantly longer to get to the 'figured out' level that SC2 only took a couple years to get to, but that's apples/oranges too because it's a different world nowadays than when BW was released. | ||
Firebolt145
Lalalaland34504 Posts
Edit: nvm, reread your post, you had a slightly different meaning. | ||
|
fortheGG
United Kingdom1002 Posts
| ||
|
EvilTeletubby
Baltimore, USA22259 Posts
On August 18 2012 17:03 Firebolt145 wrote: Do you really think that sc2 has been discovered to the same extent that bw is? Edit: nvm, reread your post, you had a slightly different meaning. Yeah. I just re-read and realized my wording was pretty terrible. I didn't actually mean to say that SC2 was figured out completely. | ||
|
CyDe
United States1010 Posts
I feel like I'm asking to open Pandora's box here, | ||
zatic
Zurich15366 Posts
LastSnow This account is no longer active | ||
salle
Sweden5554 Posts
On August 18 2012 17:11 fortheGG wrote: What do you (as a player, content provider, member of tl) think you can do to stop sc2's popularity from fading? Your questions seems to imply that SC2 is or will inevitably fade. (The latter might be true, when something "better" comes along that eclipses SC2 in popularity.) But I don't think the former is true. From the data on Liquipedia I can see it rather looks like the interest in SC2 is quite stable. Or at least the amount of people looking at Liquipedia is stable, However if the question is "What do I think as a content provider/member of TL think I can do to increase the popularity of SC2?" then my answer would be, I'm pretty much already doing it. Helping out and making Liquipedia a better resource for fans was the reason I started out with it, wanting "to give something back" kind of. I think what I do has a small but still positive impact on how accessible SC2 as a spectator sport is to people. And if you have time and want to give something back I think helping out with the wiki is a great way to do just that, since it has pretty much an unlimited potential. | ||
|
Firebolt145
Lalalaland34504 Posts
| ||
|
EvilTeletubby
Baltimore, USA22259 Posts
| ||
fusefuse
Estonia4644 Posts
| ||
|
fortheGG
United Kingdom1002 Posts
On August 18 2012 18:23 salle wrote: Your questions seems to imply that SC2 is or will inevitably fade. (The latter might be true, when something "better" comes along that eclipses SC2 in popularity.) But I don't think the former is true. From the data on Liquipedia I can see it rather looks like the interest in SC2 is quite stable. Or at least the amount of people looking at Liquipedia is stable, However if the question is "What do I think as a content provider/member of TL think I can do to increase the popularity of SC2?" then my answer would be, I'm pretty much already doing it. Helping out and making Liquipedia a better resource for fans was the reason I started out with it, wanting "to give something back" kind of. I think what I do has a small but still positive impact on how accessible SC2 as a spectator sport is to people. And if you have time and want to give something back I think helping out with the wiki is a great way to do just that, since it has pretty much an unlimited potential. Thanks for the reply. I'm sorry if the question wasn't precise as although I think the game might be in a slump, its irrelevant to the question. I've always loved liquidpedia (its how I discovered tsl 1,tl and got to watch Nony win), so thanks for all the stuff you & other staff members have done. | ||
|
EvilTeletubby
Baltimore, USA22259 Posts
| ||
Noam
Israel2209 Posts
| ||
|
Cokefreak
Finland8096 Posts
On August 18 2012 20:13 EvilTeletubby wrote: she's cuter than intrigue Cuter than Ares? If so oh my! | ||
|
elmizzt
United States3309 Posts
On August 14 2012 22:49 Archas wrote: Does the staff do translations? I'd really like to figure out what was said here; unfortunately, I can't understand a word of it. + Show Spoiler + On August 14 2012 23:03 zatic wrote: Oh what the hell LOLLLLL this is too funny | ||
|
1Eris1
United States5797 Posts
User was temp banned for this post. | ||
| ||
