EPTSet Straight By Bans? - Page 3
| Forum Index > TL Community |
|
Deleted User 31060
3788 Posts
| ||
|
Murderotica
Vatican City State2594 Posts
On September 18 2010 01:47 Geo.Rion wrote: I have no personal grudge against him or anybody else, i m around for long enough to see him trolling ruining many conversations, and i have no idea if he and Hawk are the same person or not, i thought that wasnt allowed at all. but i do remember reading trough the ban list and seeing fanaticist perma banned. I might remember wrongly or it could have been lifted. You're obviously allowed to have more than 1 account if you're a respected member. Notable examples: Hot_bid = baller Chill = iatent (Group of admin) = Clear Hawk = fanatacist vGi-CoW = Raithed etc. etc. They usually do a good job of hiding it but it wasn't that hard for Hawk because it's not really difficult to up your asshole meter by 10%. | ||
|
Tabbris
Bangladesh2839 Posts
On September 18 2010 01:52 Thoreezhea wrote: I've been here since......April. (I think, but definitely May) any1 else find it funny that the auto ban list and "set straight by bans are both bumped? Says you joined July so you have 2 weeks to go :D | ||
|
Jakalo
Latvia2350 Posts
And I got problems with it! Not with warning itself, that was warranted, but with fact that my image got edited into spoilers and there was - user was warned for this post. I mean naturally these red notifications are designed so that people see that how they should not post, but in this case they see edited/not warn worthy post and warning below. How does that serve educational purposes. | ||
|
Murderotica
Vatican City State2594 Posts
On September 18 2010 01:58 Jakalo wrote: I got warned once or twice the most recent being for posting unspoilered NSFW image. And I got problems with it! Not with warning itself, that was warranted, but with fact that my image got edited into spoilers and there was - user was warned for this post. I mean naturally these red notifications are designed so that people see that how they should not post, but in this case they see edited/not warn worthy post and warning below. How does that serve educational purposes. It serves the purpose of correcting the initial mistake that earned you a warning, which is obviously foremost in priority over re-education of the astute masses. | ||
DivinO
United States4796 Posts
| ||
|
D-Lite
United Kingdom223 Posts
| ||
|
meeple
Canada10211 Posts
| ||
|
Thoreezhea1
United States532 Posts
On September 18 2010 01:58 Tabbris wrote: Says you joined July so you have 2 weeks to go :D That's really funky. ....Maybe I started lurking in april...... Also I should be allowed to check myself. lol | ||
|
Tabbris
Bangladesh2839 Posts
On September 18 2010 01:58 Jakalo wrote: I got warned once or twice the most recent being for posting unspoilered NSFW image. And I got problems with it! Not with warning itself, that was warranted, but with fact that my image got edited into spoilers and there was - user was warned for this post. I mean naturally these red notifications are designed so that people see that how they should not post, but in this case they see edited/not warn worthy post and warning below. How does that serve educational purposes. You should know better. And they cant just leave the picture there for unsuspecting eyes | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
No lesson learned here  | ||
|
Tabbris
Bangladesh2839 Posts
On September 18 2010 02:01 Thoreezhea wrote: That's really funky. ....Maybe I started lurking in april...... Also I should be allowed to check myself. lol You can...just go to your profile | ||
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
 There are others too... pretty good system. But the success rate isn't TOO high I might add. There are a damn lot of repeat offenders. | ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32107 Posts
| ||
Chill
Calgary25991 Posts
On September 18 2010 02:02 Amber[LighT] wrote: I got a ban for being funny, and a warning because baneling-mods have very little sense of humor. No lesson learned here I love these posts because they never contain the links. I'll drop them here so people can decide. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=127743 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=144938¤tpage=3#41 | ||
CTStalker
Canada9720 Posts
On September 18 2010 02:00 DivinO wrote: Fanatacist asked to be permabanned. And it wasn't much of a perm. He still posts here (and it's not hawk ) | ||
|
Chill
Calgary25991 Posts
On September 18 2010 02:05 Hawk wrote: On a slightly more real note, I think every single one of my bans/warnings was executed by a Euro admin. Pretty much supports the conclusion that you all have piss poor humo(u)r!!! Hawk was just banned by Kennigit. The following Auto-Warning was sent to this user by Manifesto7 Hawk was just temp banned for 2 days by Twisted. Hawk was just temp banned for 30 days by Kennigit. The following Auto-Warning was sent to this user by Nyovne 2/5. O_o | ||
|
RebirthOfLeGenD
USA5860 Posts
| ||
|
Tabbris
Bangladesh2839 Posts
On September 18 2010 02:04 {88}iNcontroL wrote: Bans can absolutely clean up a person. I had my first account on TL banned (rightfully so!) and since then I have progressed over the years rather nicely if I might say so There are others too... pretty good system. But the success rate isn't TOO high I might add. There are a damn lot of repeat offenders. I wanted to make a comment about micronesia but im not sure what interview im thinking of | ||
|
Jakalo
Latvia2350 Posts
On September 18 2010 02:16 Chill wrote: I love these posts because they never contain the links. I'll drop them here so people can decide. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=127743 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=144938¤tpage=3#41 What, Chill giving power of decision to the masses? Will his name be cleared if we so decide ^^ not that he should, these are quite thoroughly failed attempts to make a joke P.S. Chill if you dont mind sharing, what happened to TL attack, I was convinced it was scheduled twice in a month? | ||
| ||
