According to a Forum post on that other site ( http://www.gosugamers.net/starcraft/thread/423824-why-the-sc2-matches-weren-t-broadcasted ) the SC2 exhibition games between Nada and Moon and other pro gamers weren't broadcasted thanks to KeSPA. According to that post, Tasteless and Artosis mentioned that KeSPA did not want those progamers to even participate in the exhibition matches.
Somehow i can't believe this. I never thought KeSPA was so powerful, but after owning several pros in the past ( http://www.teamliquid.net/powerrank/index.php?prid=28 see rank 9 ), now they seem to want to piss everyone else off too.
Yes this is true. Has to do with blizzard/kespa politics and ESPORTS drama. I was hoping Paul Sams would jump on stage and slice the KESPA president's chest open with Frostmourne.
This doesn't make any sense. Some of the games were between WC3 Pro's and not SC pros. KeSPA has no authority over WC3 pro's (To the best of my understanding, correct?), so why weren't the Shy v Who and other matches broadcast?
Secondly, GARIMTO isn't even a Pro-gamer anymore so how can they have authority over him?
KESPA still had governance over estars or at least heavy heavy sway with it's organizers...it makes perfect sense. It has nothing to do with the progamers. It's Kespa vs Blizzard. That is all this is about.
On July 27 2009 09:44 Kennigit wrote: Yes this is true. Has to do with blizzard/kespa politics and ESPORTS drama. I was hoping Paul Sams would jump on stage and slice the KESPA president's chest open with Frostmourne.
Don't these guys understand if they keep up their antics they're going to be ruining E-Sports and its a lose/lose situation for both? Fucking power corrupts all.
It's akin to the NFL not broadcasting Pre-Season games, or the All-Star game. Makes no sense. >.<
Sometimes I wonder if KESPA is just trying to see how many people they can upset before they inevitably become obsolete when SC2 is governed by Blizzard.
Im happy kespa is going to die/get whipped into obedience by blizzard. No lan means blizzard controls what organizations do what with battle.net tournys. I always thought it was inappropriate that blizzard wasn't making a pretty penny off a giant competitive organization centered around one of their games. Hopefully Blizzard doesn't abuse this potential, yet I do hope they abuse it enough to cripple KESPA and make them their bitch.
Kespa was a Korean organization suitable for a Korean eSports scene. When SC2 comes and eSports grows beyond their borders, they will find that they do not have the flexibility to adapt to the new environment.
That being said, they are going to hold onto their chips for as long as possible, and create some drama in the meantime.
On July 27 2009 09:49 Mikilatov wrote: Sometimes I wonder if KESPA is just trying to see how many people they can upset before they inevitably become obsolete when SC2 is governed by Blizzard.
On July 27 2009 10:02 illu wrote: I don't see why Kespa cannot govern wc3 players. Afterall it's Korean e-Sports Association, not Korean Starcraft Association.
Because WC3 pros aren't licensed by KeSPA. Therefore, KeSPA has no authority over them.
It's like if Grubby and Sky played SC2 KeSPA would have no say if they could play or not. Blizzard controls whether or not SC2 is actually broadcasted, since they payed for the spot in the building, no (And they own SC2)?
The original linked article specifically only mentioned Nal_Ra, Moon, and NaDa all 3 of which Korean and under contract with KeSPA (correct me if I'm mistaken).
On July 27 2009 10:02 illu wrote: I don't see why Kespa cannot govern wc3 players. Afterall it's Korean e-Sports Association, not Korean Starcraft Association.
Because WC3 pros aren't licensed by KeSPA. Therefore, KeSPA has no authority over them.
It's like if Grubby and Sky played SC2 KeSPA would have no say if they could play or not. Blizzard controls whether or not SC2 is actually broadcasted, since they payed for the spot in the building, no (And they own SC2)?
The original linked article specifically only mentioned Nal_Ra, Moon, and NaDa all 3 of which Korean and under contract with KeSPA (correct me if I'm mistaken).
Something is afoul here.
There are wc3 pros who have prolicense. Moon, ReiGn etc. You were talking about Grubby or Sky who aren't even koreans.
A big fuck you to KeSPA as usual. I wouldn't be suprised if KeSPA forces more teams to drop out of the next GOM classic. If that happens it's time for some netized MASS protesting.
That's odd. They must have had some adequate reason for urinating all over the potential games. Unless we're dealing with ridiculous levels of corruption, in which case we should all grab our panic blankies and stock up on food.
On July 27 2009 11:14 StarBrift wrote: A big fuck you to KeSPA as usual. I wouldn't be suprised if KeSPA forces more teams to drop out of the next GOM classic. If that happens it's time for some netized MASS protesting.
On July 27 2009 11:14 StarBrift wrote: A big fuck you to KeSPA as usual. I wouldn't be suprised if KeSPA forces more teams to drop out of the next GOM classic. If that happens it's time for some netized MASS protesting.
On July 27 2009 11:14 StarBrift wrote: A big fuck you to KeSPA as usual. I wouldn't be suprised if KeSPA forces more teams to drop out of the next GOM classic. If that happens it's time for some netized MASS protesting.
The games were not even best of 3, so Kespa did me a favor in this case, by keeping me from wasting my time watching them. I'm not a big fan of Kespa, but at least they have a track record of running something that approaches professional quality. Blizzard's events tend to look cheap and amateurish.
On July 27 2009 11:50 ViruX wrote: Blizzard should just go "Hey KeSPA, $1000 royalty on any broadcasted games, that'll teach you for being dicks"
You're right, lets just end Korean SC now because kespa didn't like a showmatch. Sheesh.
I am sure they can afford it
That's highly highly unlikely. SC may be a phenomenon in the esports world in korea, but that's only in the esports world. It's not worth nearly as much as most physical sports.
On July 27 2009 12:00 moebius_string wrote: The games were not even best of 3, so Kespa did me a favor in this case, by keeping me from wasting my time watching them. I'm not a big fan of Kespa, but at least they have a track record of running something that approaches professional quality. Blizzard's events tend to look cheap and amateurish.
The games were bo3... im stupid, was 1-1
Kespa is a fun bandwagon to jump up and down on, but they basically created the best version of esports on the planet. Blizzard is a software company, not a media production company, and every attempt they have made at it so far shows they have a ways to go.
Would kespa style management work in the states? Maybe not, but it is designed to serve the industry located in a single city. There are things they could do better, but there are already a lot of things they do right.
On July 27 2009 09:44 Kennigit wrote: Yes this is true. Has to do with blizzard/kespa politics and ESPORTS drama. I was hoping Paul Sams would jump on stage and slice the KESPA president's chest open with Frostmourne.
On July 27 2009 12:00 moebius_string wrote: The games were not even best of 3, so Kespa did me a favor in this case, by keeping me from wasting my time watching them. I'm not a big fan of Kespa, but at least they have a track record of running something that approaches professional quality. Blizzard's events tend to look cheap and amateurish.
The games were bo3...
Kespa is a fun bandwagon to jump up and down on, but they basically created the best version of esports on the planet. Blizzard is a software company, not a media production company, and every attempt they have made at it so far shows they have a ways to go.
Would kespa style management work in the states? Maybe not, but it is designed to serve the industry located in a single city. There are things they could do better, but there are already a lot of things they do right.
Din't kespa just jump in on the scene? i don't think they created esports the way it is today
On July 27 2009 12:00 moebius_string wrote: The games were not even best of 3, so Kespa did me a favor in this case, by keeping me from wasting my time watching them. I'm not a big fan of Kespa, but at least they have a track record of running something that approaches professional quality. Blizzard's events tend to look cheap and amateurish.
The games were bo3...
Kespa is a fun bandwagon to jump up and down on, but they basically created the best version of esports on the planet. Blizzard is a software company, not a media production company, and every attempt they have made at it so far shows they have a ways to go.
Would kespa style management work in the states? Maybe not, but it is designed to serve the industry located in a single city. There are things they could do better, but there are already a lot of things they do right.
^^ you're right, I mixed it up with Heritage. Kespa is run by the proteams, so they didn't just "jump in". They helped create an entity to manage pro teams, licenses, drafts, etc, and negotiate between the teams and broadcasters. Obviously it is very incestuous because OGN owns a team, SKT1 owners help run kespa (thus the GOM problem) etc etc.
gamers like to think of BW and s][c as being part of a continuum. but as far as the bizniss of making money off of games and gamers is concerned. brood war and starcraft2 are competitors and might as well be different genres and different titles all together. the biggest factor is not the new game but the new battlenet. activlizzard has limited the extent to which kespa will have a monopoly on gaming. the kespa pimps are understandably peeved and want to keep their hos of the stage sluttin' it for another man's game.
I could care less about KeSPA or "Korean pros." SC2 will be big enough that I don't think we will always have to be looking -just- at Koreans to get quality entertainment and great games.
We should still be grateful to KeSPA because they're the org that keeps SC:BW today. Though, their management could be better, we shouldn't blame their asses off for letting us watch free PRO SC games.
On July 27 2009 13:59 GTR wrote: we all have to admit, kespa did bring e-sports into the mainstream, and eventually made it the 2nd most watched sport in korea behind football.
What Koreans play soccer? I was under the impression it went Baseball > SC. Baseball is extremely popular in Korea and Eastern Asia in general. Intrigued by this, have any stats to back this up, I'm genuinely interested.
I could care less about KeSPA or "Korean pros." SC2 will be big enough that I don't think we will always have to be looking -just- at Koreans to get quality entertainment and great games.
On July 27 2009 12:13 Manifesto7 wrote: Kespa is a fun bandwagon to jump up and down on, but they basically created the best version of esports on the planet. Blizzard is a software company, not a media production company, and every attempt they have made at it so far shows they have a ways to go.
Would kespa style management work in the states? Maybe not, but it is designed to serve the industry located in a single city. There are things they could do better, but there are already a lot of things they do right.
Are the people running KeSPA now the same ones who ran it when it was building (and actually helping) the Korean e-sports scene?
On July 27 2009 09:59 Manifesto7 wrote: Kespa was a Korean organization suitable for a Korean eSports scene. When SC2 comes and eSports grows beyond their borders, they will find that they do not have the flexibility to adapt to the new environment.
That being said, they are going to hold onto their chips for as long as possible, and create some drama in the meantime.
Good post. Like all things it's a bit grey and there are multiple factors to weigh in making a decision.
I'm sure KESPA was just looking out for its players. I mean, they wouldn't want to risk injury in the rough contact sport that is Starcraft 2 would they?
T.T KeSPA... They've become way too powerful considering they don't serve much of a purpose. I mean the pro teams shoudl be like F U KeSPA and make a new organizational league that is just cooperative within themselves. I realize it must be more complicated than that but it seems KeSPA is undeserving of the power they've come to wield.
Who would gain an advantage of a BC? Blizzard (at least a little). Kespa and Blizzard obviously don't harmonize, so why should Kespa support something that would be good for Blizzard, it's just business...
*Sigh* Blizzard doesn't want to create the tournaments, they want to develop their games and give the community necessary tools and means to create their own tournaments. Why would they spend money doing something the community/KeSPA does for free? Even though KeSPA makes money as a government body of e-sport in Korea it will be far from profitable world wide, especially for a game developing company. Remember that KeSPA is an e-sport association, they don't produce broadcasts. And they are not only a dictator of rules and ranks, they also shuffles money into the e-sport industry and makes sure every team can compete on the same level, economy wise.
Have a look at ICCup as a ladder, it works because there are a lot of volunteers in the communiy. They check replays for abuse and cheats, etc. thus Blizzard have to create a tool in Bnet 2.0 for moderating cheat/bad manner reports. Teamliquid is another great example, they create tournaments, or at least affiliates themselves with the tournament creators. They give the community write-ups, betting and what not to create excitement for the community. I don't see any reason why blizzard would focus their time on anything like this.
It remains to be seen whether or not Game Masters (volunteers) will be part of the new Bnet 2.0 and if they will play any role in Starcraft other than the removal of inappropriate names etc. Last but not least, I don't see any reason why KeSPA wouldn't be able to continue with what they are doing, nothing about the no-LAN issue affects KeSPA. Don't you think they have internet to connect with Bnet 2.0?
On July 27 2009 14:24 keV. wrote: I could care less about KeSPA or "Korean pros." SC2 will be big enough that I don't think we will always have to be looking -just- at Koreans to get quality entertainment and great games.
as much as blizzard is responsible for the greatness of starcraft as a game, kespa needs to get a LOT of credit for making starcraft the most prestigious e-sport ever, anywhere. in fact, they deserve a lot of credit for even making the genre of e-sport. even after 10+ years starcraft reigns near-supreme, even with its outdated graphics/multiplayer system. kespa made this; created a market where there was once none, convinced GIRLS to like starcraft, and made game-nerds into rockstars.
i'm not kespa is a great organization. i am saying that i can sympathize with them
On July 27 2009 17:23 Tef wrote: *Sigh* Blizzard doesn't want to create the tournaments, they want to develop their games and give the community necessary tools and means to create their own tournaments. Why would they spend money doing something the community/KeSPA does for free? Even though KeSPA makes money as a government body of e-sport in Korea it will be far from profitable world wide, especially for a game developing company. Remember that KeSPA is an e-sport association, they don't produce broadcasts. And they are not only a dictator of rules and ranks, they also shuffles money into the e-sport industry and makes sure every team can compete on the same level, economy wise.
Have a look at ICCup as a ladder, it works because there are a lot of volunteers in the communiy. They check replays for abuse and cheats, etc. thus Blizzard have to create a tool in Bnet 2.0 for moderating cheat/bad manner reports. Teamliquid is another great example, they create tournaments, or at least affiliates themselves with the tournament creators. They give the community write-ups, betting and what not to create excitement for the community. I don't see any reason why blizzard would focus their time on anything like this.
It remains to be seen whether or not Game Masters (volunteers) will be part of the new Bnet 2.0 and if they will play any role in Starcraft other than the removal of inappropriate names etc. Last but not least, I don't see any reason why KeSPA wouldn't be able to continue with what they are doing, nothing about the no-LAN issue affects KeSPA. Don't you think they have internet to connect with Bnet 2.0?
Just my 2 cents.
blizzard wants control of everything Kespa is doing cuz they can get consistent revenue doing so through royalties. It wouldn't be much different from the 15 a month they make x 10 million + from Wow
Kespa needs to get their heads out of their asses and stop swinging around their authority bat like a spoiled brat.
yes, E-Sports is what it is today because of Kespa, Kespa created the infrastructure which facilitates the development of e-sports ever since the dawn of time, but come-on, look at what kespa did in the past few months, how the f*ck can u possibly defend such a corrupt, idiotic organisation?
what did they do recently to help promote e-sports? Stop teams from participating in a network which broadcast pro-games internationally in english because they had no say in who Blizzard decides to invite to THEIR events? Randomly disqualifies players from tournaments because they accidentally typed A in chat? enforcing retarded rules without using common-sense at all and monopolizes the entire E-sports industries and runs it like tyrant?
We need the the infrastructure that Kespa created, but we DON'T need the retarded and immature management behind the current incarnation of Kespa, there has to be a change in management and Blizzard is going to make that happen in SC2.
i'm not sure whether if this claims of Kespa not letting them broadcasts SC2 matches because they are being retarded again is true, any proof for this? because if it is, boy... its going to be a matter of time behind an angry nerd pulls off a crazy shooting/bombing shit in Kespa's HQ.
IMO, OGN and MBC would've had success with OSL/MSL/Proleague without the creation of KeSPA. I don't believe that the contributions of the KeSPA members outside of the broadcasting companies were so valuable that StarCraft would've died in Korea without them. Sure KeSPA has had an overall positive impact on StarCraft in Korea, but it wasn't a life-or-death thing.
On July 27 2009 16:13 Jonoman92 wrote: T.T KeSPA... They've become way too powerful considering they don't serve much of a purpose. I mean the pro teams shoudl be like F U KeSPA and make a new organizational league that is just cooperative within themselves. I realize it must be more complicated than that but it seems KeSPA is undeserving of the power they've come to wield.
Haha, KeSPA is the progaming teams. KeSPA consists of one member from each of the teams' companies. But then the sponsors of a team don't always do what the team wants to do. It's a very weird move, at least in my American opinion, that the sponsors of the teams would also run the governing entity. They purposely and openly govern KeSPA in a way that's best for their companies and not what's best for eSports.
I think it kind of sucks how Blizzard just jump back in and say... well SC is popular and we have SC2 coming out now so lets take it back... I know they are not actually doing that but I get that impression a little bit from some of the actions they have made (i.e. chucking money at GOM and saying to Kespa you are not going to choose who goes to BlizzCon this year we will, through GOM).
IMHO it's understandable that KESPA is pissed. They know that when SC2 comes out they will no longer be the major player like they are now (noone likes to be told to go sit on the bench after being 'the' starting player all along. I really hope the big cheeses at KESPA work out a suitable strategy to liaise with Blizzard. I really can see KESPA becoming either an associate of Blizzard and working with them to promote SC2 in Korea. Blizzard is going to need people there who have experience/knowledge and can speak Korean (lol) anyways so why doesn't KESPA step up and evolve into a new style organisation. If they don't they will be steamrolled by Blizzard and die for sure.
It's up to you KESPA... convince Blizzard you are worth keeping around.
It is funny how you are all bashing Kespa whereas it is the only reason why Bw is still alive today. Without the pros + all the new maps and drama i doubt bw would be a competitive game.
Don't forget that Blizzard goal is to make money by selling games ( think 3-parts starcraft 2 = 3x more money ) whereas Kespa makes money by providing awesome tournaments to the audience.
That's absolutly different. Remember how Blizz didn't care about bw until they started the development of Sc2. Who made Lan latency ? Who made the ladders ? Who made the tournaments ? The communauty ( And Kespa belongs to the communauty ) not Blizzard.
I also guess that Blizzard would have prefered that bw died around 2004 because this game isn't really profitable anymore and they had to delay its sequel because it seems quite hard to make a game as good and they will make us( the community) pay for it because i think that there are some guys at the head of Activision/Blizz who think that the 2004 <-> 2009 period of bw wasn't EV+ enough. So they just want to make a lot of money from Kespa and they have the right to. But will it be good for the community ? I'm not sure.
The relation between Blizzard and bw makes think that "the problem with a nearly indestructible product is that shoppers rarely need to replace"
Now we are about to get the sequel they will try to get a maximum of money even if it means stomping parts of the community like Kespa or private ladders, making 2 expansions, diverse fees and no Lan.
But that's cool we have a bunch of kids yelling "Fuck Kespa". Thank God.
On July 27 2009 21:39 Liquid`NonY wrote: Haha, KeSPA is the progaming teams. KeSPA consists of one member from each of the teams' companies. But then the sponsors of a team don't always do what the team wants to do. It's a very weird move, at least in my American opinion, that the sponsors of the teams would also run the governing entity. They purposely and openly govern KeSPA in a way that's best for their companies and not what's best for eSports.
It's a very east asian way to do business. Then there's a scandal and someone has to kill themselves.
i'm just going to say that kespa/ogn/mbc do a hell of a lot better organizing and broadcasting SC than any of the organizations broadcasting and organizing 'blizzard sanctioned' WoW tournaments. It's dumb if kespa isn't broadcasting these SC2 matches as part of a power struggle with Blizzard (kespa WILL lose when SC2 comes out), but i'm not exactly sure I want Blizzard taking over or getting their hand in things.
On July 27 2009 23:55 entrails wrote: i'm just going to say that kespa/ogn/mbc do a hell of a lot better organizing and broadcasting SC than any of the organizations broadcasting and organizing 'blizzard sanctioned' WoW tournaments. It's dumb if kespa isn't broadcasting these SC2 matches as part of a power struggle with Blizzard (kespa WILL lose when SC2 comes out), but i'm not exactly sure I want Blizzard taking over or getting their hand in things.
I don't like Blizzard's decision of taking out lan play in SC2 , not anyone can afford to have internet all the time to play the game with someone other then the computer . Korean SC scene has a big part in why starcraft is such a popular game in the first place . The Korean proteams their tournaments PL MSL OSL are very well organized and just by watching them people get in to the starcraft a lot . Many people watch a lot of pro starcraft , but don't play the game or play it casual . But if blizzard wants to make a decision to take control of everything in SC 2 they should do a better job with organizing and broadcasting of SC 2 tournaments better then Kespa in SC 1 otherwise people would still end up following starcraft scene if SC2 is poorly orginized .
Since Kespa didn't give a reason for not allowing video of the matches, I try to interpret this from their position.
Starcraft 2 is an incomplete game. If a bug or glitch were to happen it would appear as if they had done harm to the game's image (from Kespa's position). No one in Korea has played the game extensively so they do not know how stable it is.
Kespa (as I see it) wants to give a good and professional image to Blizzard to let them know they are capable of running the scene. The best case scenario would be that they make a lot of fans happy and give the game more exposure. The worst case would be looking bad in front of Blizzard.
Edit: What I mean to say is that Kespa is just being cautious.
PC gaming is just over the hill. Few years ago developers were still concerned with making the best map editors possible, being as user friendly as possible and basically making a great game packed with features. Now in the name of "controlling the product" it's the other way around.
Few years ago we bought a game. Now we buy a game along with the one and only company-approved way to enjoy it. We're not buying SC2. We're buying Bnet 2.0, the playground, and the SC2 box letting you play SC2 is just a side-benefit. This is sleazy marketing and I don't care what the eternal defenders of the idiocies of capitalism (such as planned obsolescence) are going to come up with here.
Speaking of planned obsolescence, that's exactly what is happening to gaming. Yes, a product that lasts 10 years and generates so much hype out of the company's control is obviously bad! (for the company, not the consumer) So let's introduce controls and make sure that never happens again. Yay for mediocrity!
Do not forget, as a gamer, that your interest (getting a great game with as little artificial barriers as possible to ensure a strong ever expanding community) and the developer's ($ which implies maximum possible control of your software to charge extra for w/e features and terminate it when you please) are now radically opposed.
I say fuck Blizzard. For all its supposed faults, KeSPA got the job done. Blizzard can make great games. But oversee (since their authorizations through bnet 2.0 will have the final say on anything) the whole esports scene and keep it as healthy as possible? I highly doubt they have the slightest clue wtf they're doing there. And if the esport orgs boycott Blizzard, I have a feeling Blizz will be looking pretty fucking stupid. So I don't think the politics are as one-sided as some would have it here. KeSPA has its cards to play.
Im the original creator of that post and I must say Im suprised it spread to Teamliquid also.
In any case we the foreigners are the ones losing out here. True kespa did alot for starcraft but what did they do to make the game more international? We had to go underground to stream matches live and all these years there was not a single event that had English coverage until the Gom events. Kespa could have easily done it. They could have picked up tasteless and artosis or get some commentators from fansites but they decided not to. And when gomtv finally started broadcasting a tournament with english coverage they banned certain teams from participating in it.
Is this a governing body that we really want in the starcraft community when starcraft 2 comes out? One that prevents starcraft from going international?
whats with this weird kespa defense? What good has kespa done in the past 2 years? what bad? Have we already forgotten the IEG bullshit? the ppp stuff? The killing of various leagues in the years before that?
I honestly don't get this staff led charge to paint kespa in some kind of positive light, and I don't get, why with all the evidence around us, people are actually buying into this.
KeSPA is a badly run organization that in current form does not look out for players, does not look out for teams and does not look out for the sport. It may have been a good thing in the past, but it certainly isn't doing a good job now. The players need to hurry up and actually get their own players association
On July 27 2009 09:44 Kennigit wrote: Yes this is true. Has to do with blizzard/kespa politics and ESPORTS drama. I was hoping Paul Sams would jump on stage and slice the KESPA president's chest open with Frostmourne.
On July 27 2009 09:46 Kennigit wrote: KESPA still had governance over estars or at least heavy heavy sway with it's organizers...it makes perfect sense. It has nothing to do with the progamers. It's Kespa vs Blizzard. That is all this is about.
KeSPAs decision to fight Blizzard can only have been born out of a desire to screw up their own future. It's like one day they said to themselves; "Hey, we finally have a chance to take our national sport and make it international - how do we best fuck this up and piss as many people off as possible in the process?".
Anyway, as I said in the topics about whether GOM is KeSPA approved or not, having people from competing game channels decide whether a new league is official or not.. is BAD.
Agree with fusionsdf, anything I've read about kespa in the few years I've followed the korean scene has been something I've found to be in some way unfair, especially the IEG scandal that made me (and many others) concerned about if its even possible theres a future in the scene, I remember that one OSL/MSL/PL final where it started without sounds and all they had was that long text scrolling on top of the video stream explaining the situation.
Now I don't know anything about this exact case and obviously its not fair to blame them if they didn't even have any plans on broadcasting it, but why were there streams then? Were they just ment for the other games?
Look guys, KeSPA is not needed. I hope to see GOM take the lead role. Blizzard can pump GOM full of money and they do a better job than OSL/MSL. They will have an international and national market and can develop tournaments a lot better and showcase them to a greater audience.
Now, as KeSPA is a governing body it wouldn't take much to dissolve and reinstitute a more gamer oriented body politic. That is to say, with a neutral governing body who's only job it is, is to promote the game, make sure the tournaments are run smoothly, and create a set of rules that aren't strangling and allows for EXPRESSION. You can't even hardly celebrate, you can't type anything during the game, and you are so confined in what you can and can't do that its suffocating. I'm sure you all remember how in 2002 it's A LOT funner to watch because you never know what may happen and the players can express themselves and not become robots.
I for one hope to see this happen:
KeSPA is dissolved and replaced by a neutral entity that has no one from the Corporate sponsors. The Commissioner is voted on by neutral third party arbitration. The owners of the Corporate teams can appeal decisions, but have no direct say in the every day operations of the league. However, if a majority is reached by the owners they can force a neutral arbitration on any rules or rulings sent down from the governing body. The body's main job would to hold Pro-Gamer rankings, develop the game for a greater audience, and make sure that no one becomes the NY Yankees and buys out all the good players. (While there would be other jobs, they would be ancillary; for example, Drafts, Contract arbitrations, etc.)
Get rid of the stupid licensing system. Use a more baseball oriented approach. Anyone should be able to become a pro-gamer without having to win Courage, or some other tournament. How many times have you known for someone drafted 858th+ end up making it to the Majors and doing extremely well. A lot.
So, with the new governing body taking a more hands off approach this leaves the tournament organizers and the teams themselves greater autonomy. This allows for a better spectator sport (It's all about the personalities folks). Also, for sanctioned tournaments all it takes is for the Commissioner to approve. I hope to see more than just OSL/MSL/PL. I want sponsors to get more involved (Intel, Coca Cola, etc.) Imagine having a OSL/MSL/PL/GOM/CSL/ISL. Basically I want matches played throughout the year with perhaps a one month slowdown at some point.
We'll see how it turns out though.
Also, I want to see a more military styled approach to their tournament winnings. IE Win OSL and you get a Medal, win PL and you get a Medal, come in say top 3 win % with greater than 25 games played in PL and get a ribbon. I think it looks more professional and "cooler". Imagine NaDa in the finals with 6 Medals and 25 Ribbons looking like a War Hero. Terran War Hero!
On July 28 2009 01:43 G3nXsiS wrote: Im the original creator of that post and I must say Im suprised it spread to Teamliquid also.
In any case we the foreigners are the ones losing out here. True kespa did alot for starcraft but what did they do to make the game more international? We had to go underground to stream matches live and all these years there was not a single event that had English coverage until the Gom events. Kespa could have easily done it. They could have picked up tasteless and artosis or get some commentators from fansites but they decided not to. And when gomtv finally started broadcasting a tournament with english coverage they banned certain teams from participating in it.
Is this a governing body that we really want in the starcraft community when starcraft 2 comes out? One that prevents starcraft from going international?
Spreading SC was never the kespa mandate. You might as well curse major league baseball for not expanding to africa.
The reason I am defending kespa, although I have pointed out their substantial failures as well, is that most people here have no idea who they are or what they do. They simply see "fuck kespa" and try to get a free post.
Get rid of the stupid licensing system. Use a more baseball oriented approach. Anyone should be able to become a pro-gamer without having to win Courage, or some other tournament. How many times have you known for someone drafted 858th+ end up making it to the Majors and doing extremely well. A lot.
Teams can already give licenses to anyone they want, two times a year. Also, anyone can join the b team. If they show promise there (the minors) they will get the license.
Something Ive never been clear on that perhaps someone can help with. Legally does Kespa acknowledge that they are using Blizzards intellectual property and the Blizzard has a claim to everything they do with it?
How does international copyright law work A) for videogames? B) in Korea?
They don't acknowledge it, but until recently Blizzard didn't care. Now Blizzard is trying to morph into a game developer + media company and run the sc2 scene, which means they realized "hey we should pay attention to you".
^ concurred just look at wc3/dota etc. blizzard does not give a fuck about you just as they didn't care about broodwar for the many years its popularity was isolated to korea. they only pay attention to revenue sources, ie WoW or whatever form of pay-based control they'll use for sc2
I dont have all the facts but from what ive read this is my feeling. Basically, its great for Kespa to promote and organize around the game. They should be commended for doing so. However promoting a Blizzard product and profitting from a Blizzard product are two different things. Blizzard does have a right to "look the otherway" for as long as they want and they also have a right to step in at any point and reclaim their intellectual property.
Now you can say "oh there just doing it for money." And yes that is a driving force behind blizzard's decisons. But its wrong to assume what makes blizzard money and whats best for starcraft are two mutually exclusive concepts.
Well personally I don't think Blizzard wanting more control on e-sports is necessarily a bad thing. Keep in mind that control doesn't have to be constricting, kinda like how the map editor is "Blizzard-controlled" yet still manages to be full of community creativity and freedom.
It all depends on how Blizzard manages it and what exactly will they operate themselves or allow the community to handle. Obviously Blizzard wants a share of the profit (businesses want money after all), but it might not be so bad if Battle.Net really turns out to be as great as Blizzard wants it to be. Blizzard at the very least seems to be putting a lot more effort into the SC2 esports scene than the ones for WoW, DotA, and the like.
On July 28 2009 09:01 Spawkuring wrote: Well personally I don't think Blizzard wanting more control on e-sports is necessarily a bad thing. Keep in mind that control doesn't have to be constricting, kinda like how the map editor is "Blizzard-controlled" yet still manages to be full of community creativity and freedom.
It all depends on how Blizzard manages it and what exactly will they operate themselves or allow the community to handle. Obviously Blizzard wants a share of the profit (businesses want money after all), but it might not be so bad if Battle.Net really turns out to be as great as Blizzard wants it to be. Blizzard at the very least seems to be putting a lot more effort into the SC2 esports scene than the ones for WoW, DotA, and the like.
I hope Blizzard gets more involved in the sponsoring and promotion aspect. Collect your royalties, and sponsor tournaments (Imagine a Blizzard Starleague o.O), but let the community run the actual Proleagues, Individual Leagues, etc. Support GOM, market internationally, and help start up an American Proleague is all I ask for, nothing more.
Hopefully Blizzard and its affiliates can get with channels like G4TV, ESPN, Spike, MTV, to broadcast tournaments. Once corporations see how much interest there is in SC2, all you need is someone like Super Daniel Man to drive it home to them how cost-effective the marketing would be to a young to mid-age demographic. So, market to corporations and companies that try to target those demographics like a Best Buy, Verizon, Intel / Microsoft, Target, Pepsi, etc. For these guys a few million + a year to get to hundreds of thousands / millions of people around the world is a pittance. I hope Super Daniel Man follows through on what he said he wants to do and hopefully comes to America and tries to set up a Proleague here.
Ah, Imagine having Proleague broadcasted on ESPN 2, and Individual Leagues on G4TV. Only problem would be where to setup the actual Proleague because you can't have teams all around the country it would be monetarily infeasible for such an upstart business venture (and cuts into practice time way too much). I would say....either Southern California, New York, or Chicago.
Ah, one can dream I suppose. It is possible because MLG is immensely popular and many Halo 3 pros get paid 100,000$+ all ready and its broadcasted on ESPN.
Edit: I really, really, really want to see (If this ever comes to fruition) the American Proleague champion vs the Korean Proleague champion. Of course me being biased would say Americans 4-3 first set and losing second set 4-3, but winning the Ace match to take the world Championship.
On July 27 2009 09:44 Kennigit wrote: Yes this is true. Has to do with blizzard/kespa politics and ESPORTS drama. I was hoping Paul Sams would jump on stage and slice the KESPA president's chest open with Frostmourne.
I can't understand how OGN, MBC and KeSPA can possibly own teams and not have a conflict of interest ... To me KeSPA isn't looking out for e-sports but are just looking out for themselves (like that they wouldn't BC Starcraft2)
On July 28 2009 09:01 Spawkuring wrote: Well personally I don't think Blizzard wanting more control on e-sports is necessarily a bad thing. Keep in mind that control doesn't have to be constricting, kinda like how the map editor is "Blizzard-controlled" yet still manages to be full of community creativity and freedom.
It all depends on how Blizzard manages it and what exactly will they operate themselves or allow the community to handle. Obviously Blizzard wants a share of the profit (businesses want money after all), but it might not be so bad if Battle.Net really turns out to be as great as Blizzard wants it to be. Blizzard at the very least seems to be putting a lot more effort into the SC2 esports scene than the ones for WoW, DotA, and the like.
I hope Blizzard gets more involved in the sponsoring and promotion aspect. Collect your royalties, and sponsor tournaments (Imagine a Blizzard Starleague o.O), but let the community run the actual Proleagues, Individual Leagues, etc. Support GOM, market internationally, and help start up an American Proleague is all I ask for, nothing more.
Hopefully Blizzard and its affiliates can get with channels like G4TV, ESPN, Spike, MTV, to broadcast tournaments. Once corporations see how much interest there is in SC2, all you need is someone like Super Daniel Man to drive it home to them how cost-effective the marketing would be to a young to mid-age demographic. So, market to corporations and companies that try to target those demographics like a Best Buy, Verizon, Intel / Microsoft, Target, Pepsi, etc. For these guys a few million + a year to get to hundreds of thousands / millions of people around the world is a pittance. I hope Super Daniel Man follows through on what he said he wants to do and hopefully comes to America and tries to set up a Proleague here.
Ah, Imagine having Proleague broadcasted on ESPN 2, and Individual Leagues on G4TV. Only problem would be where to setup the actual Proleague because you can't have teams all around the country it would be monetarily infeasible for such an upstart business venture (and cuts into practice time way too much). I would say....either Southern California, New York, or Chicago.
Ah, one can dream I suppose. It is possible because MLG is immensely popular and many Halo 3 pros get paid 100,000$+ all ready and its broadcasted on ESPN.
Edit: I really, really, really want to see (If this ever comes to fruition) the American Proleague champion vs the Korean Proleague champion. Of course me being biased would say Americans 4-3 first set and losing second set 4-3, but winning the Ace match to take the world Championship.
Hell, blizzard has enough money that they could start their own tv station from the ground up if they really wanted to promote esports and no existing channel was taking the bait. The one thing KeSPA does/did really well was give the game a real sense of professionalism. People who aren't already fans are more likely to give it a chance if it's treated like a legitimate event with suit-clad coaches and commentators and name-brand companies sponsoring things. No one who is only slightly inclined to watch pros play halo is going to tune in to some over-wrought x-games for fat kids that passes for the way progaming is presented in the US. I just hope that if blizzard is trying to give the esports pitch to anyone they're showing clips of OSL and not MLG...
Blizzard is obviously going to broadcast Starcraft, and likely for free. Blizzard is using its experience in WoW to create not just an e-Sports scene, but an entire culture based around Starcraft II. Over the years, we have seen Blizzard take more and more control over where people play their games (most people play SC on iccup vs bnet, but in wc3, most people play on bnet over ggc, while in WoW almost everyone plays on Blizzard's servers).
Look for Starcraft broadcasting as a more intensified version of warcraft broadcasting (where people can observe LIVE at games including upgrades, units being build, food, items, everything).
This would totally cripple KeSPA's power in sanctioning LAN-based tournaments so KeSPA is trying to be as bitchy as possible before they are rendered obsolete by free broadcasting)
That being said, there are things which KeSPA is useful for. For example, pausing a game. In warcraft 3, spell timings are extremely important, and many players on battlenet abuse pause/unpause to gain an unfair advantage (Blademaster, a DPS unit is a attacking Shadow Hunter, a spell-based unit. Pause/unpause renders it impossible for a player to hit the hotkey for a spell and click on a moving blademaster). It is very unlikely that blizzard will govern these offenses, so I expect tournament organizers to have common sense and provide competent referees in case of abuse.
Blizzard need to be VERY careful here, as said above, the American approach to esports is terrible, proffesionalism and readability is key, though I can imgine the mainstream are more concerned about charismatic players than the game itself :p
Leaving behind the current fans with the revolving door policy they have in WoW is one of my big worries if they don't change.
Agreeing with Zepellin Blizz have the money to make almost anything happen, and if they want the world to change they are going to have to sink a shareholder-worrying amount into it.
Ofcourse it will pay back 10 times in the long run if it works, I hope the cash-cow of WoW is letting them take bigger risks...
@peidongyang : imo ranked games should not have pausing. Leave it to the ums (or have an option at game creation)
I'm not going to comment much on the KeSPA/Blizzard relationship until more solid info comes out, I can't imagine either side being very happy right now...If blizz could get KeSPA on their side it would be a great spring board into legitimacy.
On July 28 2009 01:43 G3nXsiS wrote: Im the original creator of that post and I must say Im suprised it spread to Teamliquid also.
In any case we the foreigners are the ones losing out here. True kespa did alot for starcraft but what did they do to make the game more international? We had to go underground to stream matches live and all these years there was not a single event that had English coverage until the Gom events. Kespa could have easily done it. They could have picked up tasteless and artosis or get some commentators from fansites but they decided not to. And when gomtv finally started broadcasting a tournament with english coverage they banned certain teams from participating in it.
Is this a governing body that we really want in the starcraft community when starcraft 2 comes out? One that prevents starcraft from going international?
Spreading SC was never the kespa mandate. You might as well curse major league baseball for not expanding to africa.
The reason I am defending kespa, although I have pointed out their substantial failures as well, is that most people here have no idea who they are or what they do. They simply see "fuck kespa" and try to get a free post.
Look man, all kespa does is organize and host tournaments. They hire the commentators/stupid referees and booth girls, set up the equipment, sell the tickets, and gather money from TV stations and sponsers. That's all they do. Granted, they do a better job than Blizzard at hosting events, but that doesn't really say much.
Now Kespa has become complacent. They found a system that makes money for them and saturated the Korean sc market and they did it all without having to pay Blizzard anything, and now they just want to sit back and let the money roll in.
However, if kespa is going to bitch and moan when Blizzard comes out with a new game and tries to make a profit from it, then guess what? Blizzard is going to either host the thing themselves or find another organization that can. Organizing events isn't rocket science and kespa isn't some magical organization that can only make it happen, even GOM has proved that it can be done easily and profitably. If you don't think that replacing kespa with an organization that isn't clinging on to its premade system while fighting back change like it's the end of the world, then screw you. We all know that kespa is afraid of change and complacent, and if we want E-sports and starcraft to move on and grow, then we can't have this organization holding us back.