On July 15 2009 23:53 sArite_nite wrote:Show nested quote +On July 15 2009 23:07 AdunToridas wrote:On July 15 2009 08:04 cgrinker wrote:Don't you see that Blizzard is just taking advantage of the community by saying "We aren't sure of what we are going to do," and then just having us come up with all of the content?

Well I rather doubt that

'Course I heard that there are some Blizzard Staff members in TL, but I haven't heard of a single mechanic which has been implemented because of us.. So, i don't know..
Maybe they keep accounts here to check what we want and then not implement those.
@ Skypacer
I don't know what it entails, but even if you want to implement the OC, you might have to tweak some of the stats of the building.
With the current spells, it will be an important target for the opponent.
- Will it be able to float?
- With reference to game evolution, do you think it will still be useful when progamers create a perfect build order pertaining to economy and macro their way to victory? 75 energy means the spell can only be used on two buildings at once, with the 200 energy cap. That creates one unit each, faster by 20%, for 150 energy and probably requires 2-5 apm more to pull off. At D level it's not something people will go for, at the pro level, only if it'll give a good advantage.
- I have an opinion on mules now. I rather the OC be able to produce SCVs faster, and also use drop pods to saturate SCV numbers. The Mule will be micro intensive and will take up concentration power.
Btw
Show nested quote +
- I have an opinion on mules now. I rather the OC be able to produce SCVs faster, and also use drop pods to saturate SCV numbers. The Mule will be micro intensive and will take up concentration power.
This makes me think that an OC will make a Terran comeback from harasses and pushes that much easier.
This will make the OC:
1) Top priority for player and opponent alike.
2) Mandatory for the Terran for expanding and playing a macro game.
3) Relevant in every B/O unless the Terran is going for some All-in.
^ Does this raise an issue with anyone?