All changes sound great. Old blizzard was incompetent. Obviously.
Balance Patch 5.0.11 PTR Patch Notes - Page 27
Forum Index > SC2 General |
LSN
Germany696 Posts
All changes sound great. Old blizzard was incompetent. Obviously. | ||
![]()
[Phantom]
Mexico2170 Posts
Serious: How is protoss supposed to beat lurkers if the carriers have been nerfed, and so was the disruptor. BTW, reducing the diameter of the disruptor atack, you are also reducing their efective range. Disruptors were already "barely" able to hold out if you were lucky or they didn't have vipers, now they just join the list of ground units that are countered by lurkers (all ground protoss units except immortal/archons and colossus are 1 shotted by 7 lurkers. Immortals and archons die in 2 shots) Here are some images so you see how small the new nova is. Old ![]() ![]() New Click on the images to enlarge them so you can better see the difference. old ![]() ![]() new Now here is another image this time of ultras. In the same area where you could previously only fit 11 ultras, you can now fit 13. If the change is only to make them easier to use, what is the balance council doing to reduce the increase in damage due to more ultras being able to hit the enemy at the same time? ![]() ![]() Unfortunately I don't have a way to record how FAST BL are now. Remember that speed afects air unit more because they are not restricted by terrain, so any small speed increase translates into an exponentially big mobility increase. The biggest difference I've seen with this change is not the ability to retreat or defend, but to CHASE. You cannot escape from BL anymore. Not only BL block your mobility with the broodlings, but now BL are so fast they caan chase you because your ground units are restricted by terrain, and due to the way their atack works, they can "kind of" move while shooting. What are you giving the other races to compensate? If the purpose of the Hydra, Ultra, and BL buff was to "buff underused units", why isnt the balance council buffing the Tempest? Or the Mothership? Or giving the Reaper/adept lategame upgrades. | ||
InfCereal
Canada1759 Posts
If you put half as much effort into balance whining on TL as you did on ladder, you might actually have something worthwhile to contribute to the discussion. User was warned for this post | ||
![]()
[Phantom]
Mexico2170 Posts
And yes, luck influences games. I literally said in my post that you shouldn't focus on that, and should focus on improving and getting better, it was just a psot in response of all the people who say luck has no influence in a game or that if you win 1 game you are better than your opponent. | ||
InfCereal
Canada1759 Posts
On January 21 2023 04:03 [Phantom] wrote: DO you really think those photos and points don't contribute to the discussion? because I haven't seen a lot of people mentioning that for a meele unit that can be massed like an ultralisk, reducing it's size, and increasing it's range effectively increase the damage of that type of composition. And yes, luck influences games. I literally said in my post that you shouldn't focus on that, and should focus on improving and getting better, it was just a psot in response of all the people who say luck has no influence in a game or that if you win 1 game you are better than your opponent. They've been running the patch at the ESL opens for weeks now, and simply none of the evidence supports the fearmongering you're doing in your post. Okay, you can fit 13 ultralisks into the same space as 11 before. You're ignoring the fact that 13 ultralisks are 3900/2600 and and 78 supply. Massing ultralisks has never been a good idea, you absolutely obliterate any advantage you have from a bank with a shit unit. Posting a picture of a disrupter ball is also useless. Why don't you post a video of 4 of those going off on a terran army and see if anyone can tell that the ball is smaller. | ||
![]()
[Phantom]
Mexico2170 Posts
Want to know something else thats outrageous? Scarlett is the one implementing the changes. She is the one putting the changes into the PTR and the balance patch. Source: Should be time stamped but if not, it's at 30:25 Remember early in the thread where Ahli discovered a plethora of undocumented changes including Lurker buffs? On December 10 2022 04:48 Ahli wrote: The Lurker has a few more undocumented changes with its attack on PTR. Guess who made those changes? Scartlett. You can see all the undocumented changes here. People are not saying anything cause they accepted their fate. But not me, because this isn't an issue of only balance, but integrity. A patch with these many irregularities, bugs, and actively hiding information from the players should NEVER go through. On December 10 2022 10:31 Ahli wrote: Other notes (side effects / undocumented changes / potential bugs):
I am trying to document/comment all data changes and make notes about things that could potentially break. I am far from done, but the amount of undocumented changes is concerning. Also, there are a few small bugs that could be fixed as well:
| ||
RiSkysc2
696 Posts
On January 10 2023 09:08 Athenau wrote: You can't seriously think that anyone actually believes in a Zerg conspiracy right? You realize that's a meme right? Right? This didn't age well hahahahaha | ||
Beelzebub1
1004 Posts
Want to know something else thats outrageous? Scarlett is the one implementing the changes. She is the one putting the changes into the PTR and the balance patch. Be that as it may, I would be hard pressed to believe that even if Scarlett was the one implementing the changes to the ladder, surely she is not in charge all by herself on this issue, I'm sure there are members of other races that have a say so in these issues, ultimately someone has to be the physical body that uploads the changes to the PTR. Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't Scarlett also off race as Protoss at a high GM level? | ||
Charoisaur
Germany15867 Posts
| ||
Beelzebub1
1004 Posts
On January 21 2023 12:11 Charoisaur wrote: Regardless of your opinion on the content of the patch, I guess we can all agree that it's just a shitshow that Katowice starts in a few weeks and nobody knows when or if the patch releases and with which changes. Someone is really fucking up hard currently. Oh yea this patch has zero business going through before Katowice, it's in no way fully fleshed out and imo needs quite a few changes across the board. The creep change in particular needs to be expanded upon because it doesn't seem to really accomplish anything, in all of the PTR matches it still looked like Zerg could efficiently cover 1/2 the map in creep by the 7 minute mark. Still also slightly confused on the Hydralisk change, I never really considered the unit out of the meta, but it's receiving random love from the balance team like it's under utilized. Isn't ling/bane/Hydra still used semi frequently at the top level? | ||
tigera6
3191 Posts
| ||
syndbg
43 Posts
Disruptors were already "barely" able to hold out if you were lucky or they didn't have vipers, now they just join the list of ground units that are countered by lurkers (all ground protoss units except immortal/archons and colossus are 1 shotted by 7 lurkers. Immortals and archons die in 2 shots) My dude, if you actually understand the game a bit, you'll know that yes, archon and immortals are meant to be the ground counter. If your idea of SC2 is to mass stalkers and run over lurkers, yeah, that's probably not it. Now here is another image this time of ultras. In the same area where you could previously only fit 11 ultras, you can now fit 13. If the change is only to make them easier to use, what is the balance council doing to reduce the increase in damage due to more ultras being able to hit the enemy at the same time? Hilarious and impractical. there's no scenario in a pro game or any ladder game (that shouldn't be already super over), where 11-13 ultras surround a town hall and this decides the game, lol. Unfortunately I don't have a way to record how FAST BL are now. Remember that speed afects air unit more because they are not restricted by terrain, so any small speed increase translates into an exponentially big mobility increase. The biggest difference I've seen with this change is not the ability to retreat or defend, but to CHASE. You cannot escape from BL anymore. Not only BL block your mobility with the broodlings, but now BL are so fast they caan chase you because your ground units are restricted by terrain, and due to the way their atack works, they can "kind of" move while shooting. What are you giving the other races to compensate? Again, you're missing points of the patch notes either due to severe emotional trauma by these patch notes or something, but yes, the broods are faster and their broodlings have a shorter lifespan. Claiming broods can't be escaped is hilarious and out of touch with reality. Even more so after the latest balance mod speed adjustments. "Move while shooting" haha, bro. With 1.79 attack CD and new speed of 2.24, the potential 0.45speed stutter step is not gonna change anything. They're not marines, they're not hydras. | ||
Vision_
844 Posts
The game was supposed to be balanced after Blizzard sold. (except some shit units like lurkers), so every significant buff should be balanced with a nerf, like 10% damage less (from 35 to 32). Then, the choice of tweaking the size of area of nova spell is awkward, it doesn t help casual players and it kills the unit potential. If you wanna improve nova, it asks to redesign the unit a little bit (in adding a stun effect for example and reducing damage to avoid marauders to be one shot, so you help casual and pro players...) | ||
![]()
[Phantom]
Mexico2170 Posts
On January 21 2023 18:54 syndbg wrote: Actual metal leaguer takes so far by Phantom. My dude, if you actually understand the game a bit, you'll know that yes, archon and immortals are meant to be the ground counter. If your idea of SC2 is to mass stalkers and run over lurkers, yeah, that's probably not it. Hilarious and impractical. there's no scenario in a pro game or any ladder game (that shouldn't be already super over), where 11-13 ultras surround a town hall and this decides the game, lol. Again, you're missing points of the patch notes either due to severe emotional trauma by these patch notes or something, but yes, the broods are faster and their broodlings have a shorter lifespan. Claiming broods can't be escaped is hilarious and out of touch with reality. Even more so after the latest balance mod speed adjustments. "Move while shooting" haha, bro. With 1.79 attack CD and new speed of 2.24, the potential 0.45speed stutter step is not gonna change anything. They're not marines, they're not hydras. I'm not making stalkers vs lurkers. I'm saying that no matter what ground army you do it gets deleted in 1 second. Go make an army of many archons with 3 range and immortals (tht suck vs hydras) and tell me how you do vs lurkers. And yeah obviously include zealots and stalkers. You'll still die. You need air, or disruptors to survive until you can transition to air. 2-You can't possibly think the Ultra photo was about me complaining about 13 ultras surrounding a hatchery...It's show an image that was the easiest way to show that reducing size= more effective damage in ALL situations (not just vs hatchery) due to more ultras being able to atack at the same time. 3.-Regarding the BL. Have you played the PTR? Have you played the balance mod? Because I've been playing it a lot. You're not going to stutter step with BL, but you can definitely chase units much better. Before you were able to retreat, now it's much harder. The BL are a much better unit now. And I wouldn't be aagians't any of this, if the other races got something similar. Why aren't the other races, specially protoss receiving other buffs/reworks like tht. Why isn't the tempest of mothership being changed? O or the Reaper, BC and Adept? Or the colossus/vr/phoenix? Why is Zerg getting all these buffs and usability re-works without any regards to if the unit was balanced or not before (like the hydra). Then there are some weird changes, like changin the interceptor and carrier priority, which should mostly affect lower leagues right? Aka, Master and Below. But I thought we were balancing about the top 0.1%? why not nerf the lurker then that is so opressive? Again my issue is not only balance, but the blatant double standard of buffing zerg to make it more "fun and cool to use" without any regards for balance and not giving the other races the same treatment, and the conflic of interest shown in this patch (scarlett making changes to the mod and "whoops, by mistake I shadow buffed lurkers, oops"). Put Maru, Hero and Serral/dark in a room and let those 3 come up with the new patch, not whoever is in charge of this mess. | ||
absinthfee
Germany718 Posts
On January 22 2023 00:42 [Phantom] wrote: I'm not making stalkers vs lurkers. I'm saying that no matter what ground army you do it gets deleted in 1 second. Go make an army of many archons with 3 range and immortals (tht suck vs hydras) and tell me how you do vs lurkers. And yeah obviously include zealots and stalkers. You'll still die. You need air, or disruptors to survive until you can transition to air. 2-You can't possibly think the Ultra photo was about me complaining about 13 ultras surrounding a hatchery...It's show an image that was the easiest way to show that reducing size= more effective damage in ALL situations (not just vs hatchery) due to more ultras being able to atack at the same time. 3.-Regarding the BL. Have you played the PTR? Have you played the balance mod? Because I've been playing it a lot. You're not going to stutter step with BL, but you can definitely chase units much better. Before you were able to retreat, now it's much harder. The BL are a much better unit now. And I wouldn't be aagians't any of this, if the other races got something similar. Why aren't the other races, specially protoss receiving other buffs/reworks like tht. Why isn't the tempest of mothership being changed? O or the Reaper, BC and Adept? Or the colossus/vr/phoenix? Why is Zerg getting all these buffs and usability re-works without any regards to if the unit was balanced or not before (like the hydra). Then there are some weird changes, like changin the interceptor and carrier priority, which should mostly affect lower leagues right? Aka, Master and Below. But I thought we were balancing about the top 0.1%? why not nerf the lurker then that is so opressive? Again my issue is not only balance, but the blatant double standard of buffing zerg to make it more "fun and cool to use" without any regards for balance and not giving the other races the same treatment, and the conflic of interest shown in this patch (scarlett making changes to the mod and "whoops, by mistake I shadow buffed lurkers, oops"). Put Maru, Hero and Serral/dark in a room and let those 3 come up with the new patch, not whoever is in charge of this mess. 1) They also get deleted if they walk into 25 tanks. It is about positioning and that a t3 with two upgrades against pure ground is strong against pure ground isn't really surprising. WIth lurkers you can never chase into an army, so players have to move into lurkers for them to be good. 2) That is also not true. It is only a buff if more ultras fit into a space where they previously couldn't. If the space is big enough for 1 ultra now, it is not automatically big enough to fit two now. It is a buff to ultras, but that is mostly not about protoss, because in those games it mostly does not change anything as the ultras are only used in super late games and are the last units standing most of the time anyways. For ZvT it is nice to be able to have an alternative to lurkers and brood lord infestor. 3) They are a different unit now and hopefully not as boring as previously, where for example dark was camping and shooting his own broodlings to deal damage to a mech army. You also neglect the zerg nerfs such as creep and the ravager nerf, which is a unit that is actually used all the time in ZvP and this severely nerfs all ins in ZvT. Protoss got the QoL change for the archon which is huge against mutas as they can easily defend mineral lines from them. This is also huge against Zergling runbys as they can now position between mineral patches. Terran also got reworks with the raven for example. | ||
QOGQOG
817 Posts
On January 22 2023 04:56 absinthfee wrote: 1) They also get deleted if they walk into 25 tanks. It is about positioning and that a t3 with two upgrades against pure ground is strong against pure ground isn't really surprising. WIth lurkers you can never chase into an army, so players have to move into lurkers for them to be good. Lurkers chase retreating armies all the time. They are far more suited to aggressive moves than Siege tanks since: 1. Siege tanks take four seconds to siege up. Upgraded Lurkers take 1.07 seconds to burrow. 2. Lurkers are faster. 3. Lurkers have more health. 4. Lurkers are invisible while sieged. 5. Lurkers do damage over a much larger area. 6. Lurkers are way less vulnerable when getting in close, as they don't have a minimum range and don't do friendly fire. On January 22 2023 04:56 absinthfee wrote: 2) That is also not true. It is only a buff if more ultras fit into a space where they previously couldn't. If the space is big enough for 1 ultra now, it is not automatically big enough to fit two now. It is a buff to ultras, but that is mostly not about protoss, because in those games it mostly does not change anything as the ultras are only used in super late games and are the last units standing most of the time anyways. You do understand that no one is arguing that twice an many Ultras fit in the same area, right? The changes mean each Ultra gets in the way of other Ultras (and other units) less. It's like Ling speed: it doesn't technically increase damage output, but since more of the units can attack sooner, in effect it does. On January 22 2023 04:56 absinthfee wrote: 3) They are a different unit now and hopefully not as boring as previously, where for example dark was camping and shooting his own broodlings to deal damage to a mech army. They are a different, much stronger unit now. Which is still going to be boring to watch, just boring in a "oh, Brood Lords, Zerg wins" kind of way. On January 22 2023 04:56 absinthfee wrote: You also neglect the zerg nerfs such as creep and the ravager nerf, which is a unit that is actually used all the time in ZvP and this severely nerfs all ins in ZvT. Creep nerf makes literally no difference. The vision things is a minor QoL change, even Zerg pros has acknowledged the changes don't impact creep spread at all. Yes, Ravagers did get a very minor nerf. Great. On January 22 2023 04:56 absinthfee wrote: Protoss got the QoL change for the archon which is huge against mutas as they can easily defend mineral lines from them. How? On January 22 2023 04:56 absinthfee wrote: This is also huge against Zergling runbys as they can now position between mineral patches. Do you think that mineral patches are buildings? Unless I've missed it in the sea of undocumented changes, only Archon building collisions have been changed. On January 22 2023 04:56 absinthfee wrote: Terran also got reworks with the raven for example. Yes, Terran got reworks, while Zerg got buffs. You are making the exact point you are trying to argue against. | ||
absinthfee
Germany718 Posts
On January 22 2023 10:25 QOGQOG wrote: Lurkers chase retreating armies all the time. They are far more suited to aggressive moves than Siege tanks since: 1. Siege tanks take four seconds to siege up. Upgraded Lurkers take 1.07 seconds to burrow. 2. Lurkers are faster. 3. Lurkers have more health. 4. Lurkers are invisible while sieged. 5. Lurkers do damage over a much larger area. 6. Lurkers are way less vulnerable when getting in close, as they don't have a minimum range and don't do friendly fire. They also have less range, come out significantly later, need two upgrades, do less damage and suck against all lategame units (disruptor/carrier and ghosts/thors/siege tanks) You do understand that no one is arguing that twice an many Ultras fit in the same area, right? The changes mean each Ultra gets in the way of other Ultras (and other units) less. It's like Ling speed: it doesn't technically increase damage output, but since more of the units can attack sooner, in effect it does. Your initial statement states that it is essentially a 20% damage increase, which is just not true. Yes its a significant buff to make this unit hopefully viable for ZvT and make hydra ultras viable in ZvP, instead of corruptor broodlord infestor snoozefest. They are a different, much stronger unit now. Which is still going to be boring to watch, just boring in a "oh, Brood Lords, Zerg wins" kind of way. We haven't seen a single game where this was the case. Creep nerf makes literally no difference. The vision things is a minor QoL change, even Zerg pros has acknowledged the changes don't impact creep spread at all. Yes, Ravagers did get a very minor nerf. Great. And that is why creep got nerfed again. I am not sure how much difference it makes now. Vipers got also nerfed and ravens got buffed for ZvT, due to lower cost. Because Archons can now move from base to base and behind mineral lines and defend from mutas. They are amazing at it. See for example. Do you think that mineral patches are buildings? Unless I've missed it in the sea of undocumented changes, only Archon building collisions have been changed. Yes, Terran got reworks, while Zerg got buffs. You are making the exact point you are trying to argue against. Zerg got their core units nerfed and their units which have not seen a lot of usage buffed. The classic ling/bling/ravager composition into vipers is now slightly weaker, but the ultra hydra infestor is now significantly stronger. However, only dark played that composition before with mixed results. For ZvT ling/bling muta is slightly worse and ling/bling/hydra is stronger now. However, all ins got a significant nerf, which allows Terrans to be more greedy. | ||
Athenau
569 Posts
On January 22 2023 16:46 absinthfee wrote: They also have less range, come out significantly later, need two upgrades, do less damage and suck against all lategame units (disruptor/carrier and ghosts/thors/siege tanks) Your initial statement states that it is essentially a 20% damage increase, which is just not true. Yes its a significant buff to make this unit hopefully viable for ZvT and make hydra ultras viable in ZvP, instead of corruptor broodlord infestor snoozefest. We haven't seen a single game where this was the case. And that is why creep got nerfed again. I am not sure how much difference it makes now. Vipers got also nerfed and ravens got buffed for ZvT, due to lower cost. Because Archons can now move from base to base and behind mineral lines and defend from mutas. They are amazing at it. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoU6EdLIDh4&t=1451s for example. Archons can now move between mineral patches and you do not wanna know how many zerglings it takes to kill an archon that is between mineral patches, similar to adepts at the beginning of the game. Zerg got their core units nerfed and their units which have not seen a lot of usage buffed. The classic ling/bling/ravager composition into vipers is now slightly weaker, but the ultra hydra infestor is now significantly stronger. However, only dark played that composition before with mixed results. For ZvT ling/bling muta is slightly worse and ling/bling/hydra is stronger now. However, all ins got a significant nerf, which allows Terrans to be more greedy. The ravager "nerf" is barely noticeable. Dark has been ravager all-inning on the patch just as effectively as before. The unit itself is unchanged, and a 4 second increase in morph time barely ever matters. Ling-bane-muta hasn't been changed at all, and ling-bane-hydra is now stronger, despite being the most commonly used composition in ZvT. So, a pointless creep tumor cooldown increase, a small creep vision decrease, a very minor abduct nerf, and an irrelevant ravager morph time increase are the sum total of the hits Zerg took this patch. Wow. Meanwhile Terran and Protoss take actual nerfs to the actual stats of key units (ghosts, disruptors, batteries) without any real compensation. | ||
Beelzebub1
1004 Posts
| ||
Vision_
844 Posts
On January 22 2023 00:42 [Phantom] wrote: Then there are some weird changes, like changin the interceptor and carrier priority, which should mostly affect lower leagues right? Aka, Master and Below. But I thought we were balancing about the top 0.1%? why not nerf the lurker then that is so opressive? I think it s difficult to apply something like a nerf or buff now. Lurkers are meant to be designed like an answer to heavy robots protoss army and they do great but their problem is that these units are as good against heavy units as light units. Unless i ve missed something units are mostly design to have bonus against heavy or light armor but as Zergs can spawn multiples units at once time (plus good units against all), so this unit become a mess. Do you remember the last nerf of banelings by blizzard ? it was so significative but really accurate. I would like that they could say the same thing with Lurkers, we can decrease a bit his damage against light armor without modifying the 30 points damage against heavy. | ||
| ||