• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 07:50
CET 12:50
KST 20:50
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
WTL 2023 Summer - Qualifiers Preview + Power Rank12[Interview] Dewalt18Tournament Spotlight: Crowdfunded Pre-Season Events15[ASL15] Ro24 Preview: Welcome Back!25A Tidal Wave in Still Water - Oliveira at IEM Katowice22
Community News
Liquibet SC2 Season 27 Recap11SCboy: 2023 Tournament Plans8ESL Open Cup #166: Dark, MaxPax, ByuN win4Classic, DRG, Nice, and Strange join Mystery Gaming13Team DPG and KZ Merge, rebranded as DKZ.23
StarCraft 2
General
Where To Buy Choice CBD Gummies? The Death of Korean SC2, and Where We Go From Here Scelight 6.0: Patch 3.0 + LotV support WTL 2023 Summer - Qualifiers Preview + Power Rank Looking for a herO game
Tourneys
$10,000 PIG STY FESTIVAL 3.0! (March 15-19) [WTL 2023] Summer Qualifier and Code A Ukrainian Cup Powered By Hot Headed Gaming Playoff Kung Fu Cup and Master's Coliseum Return for 2023 Afreeca World 101!
Strategy
[H] (PvP) WTF Nexus rush into recall probe/zealot Neural parasite on disruptors?
Custom Maps
[A] Proxy Rush [A] SC Real Scale [A] (Minigames) Raynor Party [D] Planning to host a small map tournament
External Content
Mutation # 361 And Drops and Rifts Mutation # 360 Double Trouble Mutation # 359 Enhanced Defenses Mutation # 358 The Ascended
Brood War
General
The uncertainty behind FlaSh's Return; In-depth [Update] ShieldBattery: League Support! Looking for an old game (impossible challenge) [ASL15] Ro24 Preview: Welcome Back! BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.com/
Tourneys
[BSL16] RO3 - SemiFinals - Sunday 18:00 CET Copa Latinoamericana StarCraft by OliPatrick Small VOD Thread 2.0 New Worlds Map Contest III: Top 12 (VOTE HERE)
Strategy
Carriers or arbiters Starcraft Remastered Build Orders February 2023 Marine rate of fire
Other Games
General Games
Frost Giant announce Stormgate Diablo IV Final Fantasy XIV Nintendo Switch Thread Destiny 2 - PC/Xbox/PS4
Dota 2
Official Dota and Chess General Discussion Lima Major 2023
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net [Patch Notes] Release General Discussion
Heroes of the Storm
HotS: WP and Funny Moments
Hearthstone
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Liquid Arcanon News [0]Paper Team Liquid Maria L TL Mafia Idea Factory Chezinu streak(s) Mafia
Community
General
Vidalista 20 mg : The Best Choice for Enhanced Sex UK Politics Mega-thread US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Trading/Investing Thread
Fan Clubs
The Phredxor Fan Club The Scarlett Fan Club The Clem Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread [TV] HBO The Last Of Us series
Sports
2022 - 2023 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion 2021 NFL/CFB Season UFC/MMA Discussion Thread NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022 Thread
Tech Support
how to play music while streaming with xsplit Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts Happy Birthday R1CH! Ask TL Staff Anything
Blogs
Return of CranKy Du…
CranKy Ducklings
TL Currency Converter Mafia…
Minely
An ex-schizoid's u…
ApatheticSchizoid
20 years plus!
FuDDx
ASL 15 English Commentary…
namkraft
Teaching StarCraft Blog …
Lovethelord
Why Liquipedia needs Notabi…
FO-nTTaX
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1181 users

Shopify TSL 5 - The Bracket - Page 5

Forum Index > SC2 General
96 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 All
BisuDagger
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Bisutopia18736 Posts
May 13 2020 00:25 GMT
#81
On May 13 2020 07:33 ZigguratOfUr wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 13 2020 03:47 BisuDagger wrote:
On May 13 2020 03:10 Elentos wrote:
On May 13 2020 02:15 arcane1129 wrote:
On May 13 2020 01:59 Liquid`TLO wrote:
On May 13 2020 01:34 Ej_ wrote:
On May 13 2020 01:13 Liquid`TLO wrote:
I just want to point out that from my experience SC2 pros don't even like winner bracket advantage. Going through the lower bracket can sometimes be considered a bigger feat than having a perfect run through the upper bracket.
Most pros prefer an even fight for the title.

Need an opinion on the HSC format then (1 map up in bo7)! To me, it always seemed the reasonable middle-ground between winner advantage and time-consrtraint affected doubl series.


perosnally that leave a bitter taste if the finals are decided 4-3 with the winner bracket player winning. To me the finals is the ultimate test between 2 players. It's kind of disappointing to know the winner really just won by drawing 3-3.

The disadvantage having to show way more of your strategies as well as general fatigue from playing a lot more series is underplayed by a lot of people here. (fatigue in the case of TSL not really being case because of the lengthy format but SC2 on the highest level requires way more energy than some people realize.)


I agree that a 3-3 final is lame, but so is the potential for player A to beat player B in winner's finals 3-0 and then lose to player B 3-2 in grands. This would mean they both only lost 1 set (to each other) but the player that went 5-3 head to head lost.

What are your feelings on Bo5 set 1 and bo3 set 2 (if needed) for grands?

You can't plan a tournament around every possible result though. Like taking the format you mentioned, what if player B loses 2-3 initially, then wins 3-0 in the grand finals and then player A wins 2-1 in the extra bo3? "You may have lost the grand finals 2-4 overall player A, but congratulations, you're the champ anyway." is the lamest outcome. Not to mention it's a much less fair format than a Bo7 with 1 game advantage - A can win the finals by winning 2, 3 or 4 maps, B always needs to win 5.

I'd like to see a Bo7 format tested where the winner bracket player has the right to change the map order to some degree (like the 1st seed in GSL group selections can switch 2 players). Create favorable conditions without outright handing them the wins.

I like the map advantage idea too. Even if each player picks every other map, if the winner picks first in a full series they also get to pick the ace map too. It's very similar to home court advantage in the NBA.


You're still playing on the same 7 maps though. Whereas in the NBA you'll play more games on your home court if all games are played. Having more control over the order of the maps is more a psychological advantage than anything else.

Maybe a repeated map by choice might work.
ModeratorOfiicial Afreeca Starleague Caster: http://afreeca.tv/ASL2ENG2
ZigguratOfUr
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
Iraq16955 Posts
May 13 2020 00:34 GMT
#82
On May 13 2020 07:56 brickrd wrote:
these arguments are funny because frankly even bo7 is statistically not that strong of an indicator of the better player. the only "fair" way would be having every series be a bo49 or something like that, all played on one map. but as people have pointed out for years, tournaments and playoffs aren't about fairness or accuracy, they're about entertainment and drama. players should stfu and win games, fans should stfu and watch


How is that in the slightest relevant? Fairness and being a strong indicator of who the best player is aren't the same thing.
Azzur
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia6159 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-05-13 05:00:45
May 13 2020 04:54 GMT
#83
Earlier on in the thread, I suggested that the Winner Bracket winner should have a slight map pick advantage, and propose map picking order to be A-B-A-B-A-B-A. The theory is they will be able to choose the last map which will be most comfortable for them in the decider.

However, reading the thread further, I like some of the other suggestions. My preferred one:
- Winner Bracket vetoes 1 map and gets to choose a repeat map, which is played on game7.

I think the Winner Bracket deserves some sort of advantage but we don't want to detract from the viewer experience. I don't think this repeat map affects viewers at all - if it gets to g7, it will be a great viewer experience!
ZigguratOfUr
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
Iraq16955 Posts
May 13 2020 05:16 GMT
#84
On May 13 2020 13:54 Azzur wrote:
Earlier on in the thread, I suggested that the Winner Bracket winner should have a slight map pick advantage, and propose map picking order to be A-B-A-B-A-B-A. The theory is they will be able to choose the last map which will be most comfortable for them in the decider.

However, reading the thread further, I like some of the other suggestions. My preferred one:
- Winner Bracket vetoes 1 map and gets to choose a repeat map, which is played on game7.

I think the Winner Bracket deserves some sort of advantage but we don't want to detract from the viewer experience. I don't think this repeat map affects viewers at all - if it gets to g7, it will be a great viewer experience!


That sounds very... variable. Let's say you have INno vs Clem as the finals. The map pick advantage hardly matters. Let's say you have INno vs Serral as the finals. Well good luck Serral, games 1 and 7 are on Purity and Industry.
hjpalpha
Profile Joined August 2017
Germany315 Posts
May 13 2020 06:11 GMT
#85
On May 13 2020 01:13 Liquid`TLO wrote:
I just want to point out that from my experience SC2 pros don't even like winner bracket advantage. Going through the lower bracket can sometimes be considered a bigger feat than having a perfect run through the upper bracket.
Most pros prefer an even fight for the title.


I know several Pros that really dislike the no-advantage you seem to like ...
LiquipediaSCV ready | SC2-Liquipedia Admin, reviewer and editor | Wax called me a Liquipedia wizard in one of his articles for 2019 WCS Standings
Geo.Rion
Profile Blog Joined October 2008
7373 Posts
May 13 2020 06:43 GMT
#86
On May 13 2020 15:11 hjpalpha wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 13 2020 01:13 Liquid`TLO wrote:
I just want to point out that from my experience SC2 pros don't even like winner bracket advantage. Going through the lower bracket can sometimes be considered a bigger feat than having a perfect run through the upper bracket.
Most pros prefer an even fight for the title.


I know several Pros that really dislike the no-advantage you seem to like ...

I know several Pros that really like the no-advantage you seem to dislike ...
"Protoss is a joke" Liquid`Jinro Okt.1. 2011
Azzur
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia6159 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-05-13 07:20:37
May 13 2020 07:05 GMT
#87
On May 13 2020 14:16 ZigguratOfUr wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 13 2020 13:54 Azzur wrote:
Earlier on in the thread, I suggested that the Winner Bracket winner should have a slight map pick advantage, and propose map picking order to be A-B-A-B-A-B-A. The theory is they will be able to choose the last map which will be most comfortable for them in the decider.

However, reading the thread further, I like some of the other suggestions. My preferred one:
- Winner Bracket vetoes 1 map and gets to choose a repeat map, which is played on game7.

I think the Winner Bracket deserves some sort of advantage but we don't want to detract from the viewer experience. I don't think this repeat map affects viewers at all - if it gets to g7, it will be a great viewer experience!


That sounds very... variable. Let's say you have INno vs Clem as the finals. The map pick advantage hardly matters. Let's say you have INno vs Serral as the finals. Well good luck Serral, games 1 and 7 are on Purity and Industry.

Well, there is no such thing as an "ideal" solution since there are competing factors of fairness vs viewer experience.

I think most ppl will agree that the Winner Bracket deserves an advantage, and I think that most ppl will also agree that this advantage should not detract from the viewer experience.

If it's Inno vs Clem, the map picks will allow Inno to have a more comfortable match - the advantage may hardly matter but it's still an advantage regardless?

If Inno vs Serral, even though g1 and g7 is on Purity and Industry, Serral still can win those games? Better than having Inno starting with 1-0 or Serral having to win the Grand final (bo7) and then another match?

And you mention "variable" - I point out that having a random draw is variable already as some players have a preferred matchup, maps, etc.
Ej_
Profile Blog Joined January 2013
47656 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-05-13 17:16:04
May 13 2020 17:15 GMT
#88
On May 13 2020 16:05 Azzur wrote:
If Inno vs Serral, even though g1 and g7 is on Purity and Industry, Serral still can win those games?

Yeah I don't know.
"Technically the dictionary has zero authority on the meaning or words" - Rodya
Drfilip
Profile Joined March 2013
Sweden586 Posts
May 14 2020 13:50 GMT
#89
Seems like a lot of people have their own view or fairness and try to apply it without explaining which part it is that they are referring to. That doesn't work well when communicating with people that have a different view.

Is it fair that everyone is following the same rules? If so, then there is nothing to complain about.

Should we adhere to literal meanings of words? Double eliminatiin means that you need to lose twice to be out of the tournament. There needs to be a second set played if the winner's bracket finalist loses in the finals.
Also, we need to complain about the tie rules in best of series since the standard rules is that a map tie leads to a replay of that map. This would mean that the players are playing more games than the "best of" name say that they play. If you dislike that DE isn't taken literally, why aren't you equally upset that BO isn't taken literally? In order to be fair, you also need to be consistent.

Should the rules affect everybody equally? The invited players had an advantage before the tournament started. The seeding system also works on things that happened before the tournament. Is that fair? At least winning all games until the grand finals gives advantage based on results in this tournament - et less fatigue, fewer strategies shown, time to prepare while the "semi finalists" are playing.

A tournament is a time efficient and entertaining way of showing great athletes. However, it is not a great way of determining who is best. The results lack validity and reliability because the sample size is too small and most factors are not even included. The athletes are only showing their skills vs a small set of opponents instead of vs everyone, and they have very limited amount of tries to show their skills.
If you are using fairness to mean that the best player should win, another format is required.

We have people saying that some players dislike advantages and others disliking a lack of advantages, so fairness for the well being of the players' mind is not applicable as it is subjective.

I can find no way for fairness to mean that the winner's bracket finalist should get another advantage than being included in the double elimination rule, excluding if other tournaments should also be heavily criticized for their unfairness. Anyrhing else is arbitrary and is not part of "fairness".

Are you even arguing fairness?

Remember that this is showbiz.
This is not necessary for survival, this is not educational, this is not producing anything lasting. This is purely for joy in the moment.
Random Platinum EU
stilt
Profile Joined October 2012
France2564 Posts
May 14 2020 13:54 GMT
#90
On May 14 2020 22:50 Drfilip wrote:
Seems like a lot of people have their own view or fairness and try to apply it without explaining which part it is that they are referring to. That doesn't work well when communicating with people that have a different view.

Is it fair that everyone is following the same rules? If so, then there is nothing to complain about.

Should we adhere to literal meanings of words? Double eliminatiin means that you need to lose twice to be out of the tournament. There needs to be a second set played if the winner's bracket finalist loses in the finals.
Also, we need to complain about the tie rules in best of series since the standard rules is that a map tie leads to a replay of that map. This would mean that the players are playing more games than the "best of" name say that they play. If you dislike that DE isn't taken literally, why aren't you equally upset that BO isn't taken literally? In order to be fair, you also need to be consistent.

Should the rules affect everybody equally? The invited players had an advantage before the tournament started. The seeding system also works on things that happened before the tournament. Is that fair? At least winning all games until the grand finals gives advantage based on results in this tournament - et less fatigue, fewer strategies shown, time to prepare while the "semi finalists" are playing.

A tournament is a time efficient and entertaining way of showing great athletes. However, it is not a great way of determining who is best. The results lack validity and reliability because the sample size is too small and most factors are not even included. The athletes are only showing their skills vs a small set of opponents instead of vs everyone, and they have very limited amount of tries to show their skills.
If you are using fairness to mean that the best player should win, another format is required.

We have people saying that some players dislike advantages and others disliking a lack of advantages, so fairness for the well being of the players' mind is not applicable as it is subjective.

I can find no way for fairness to mean that the winner's bracket finalist should get another advantage than being included in the double elimination rule, excluding if other tournaments should also be heavily criticized for their unfairness. Anyrhing else is arbitrary and is not part of "fairness".

Are you even arguing fairness?

Remember that this is showbiz.
This is not necessary for survival, this is not educational, this is not producing anything lasting. This is purely for joy in the moment.


Then who cares about competition integrity, this is just "showbiz".
Drfilip
Profile Joined March 2013
Sweden586 Posts
May 14 2020 15:32 GMT
#91
On May 14 2020 22:54 stilt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 14 2020 22:50 Drfilip wrote:
Seems like a lot of people have their own view or fairness and try to apply it without explaining which part it is that they are referring to. That doesn't work well when communicating with people that have a different view.

Is it fair that everyone is following the same rules? If so, then there is nothing to complain about.

Should we adhere to literal meanings of words? Double eliminatiin means that you need to lose twice to be out of the tournament. There needs to be a second set played if the winner's bracket finalist loses in the finals.
Also, we need to complain about the tie rules in best of series since the standard rules is that a map tie leads to a replay of that map. This would mean that the players are playing more games than the "best of" name say that they play. If you dislike that DE isn't taken literally, why aren't you equally upset that BO isn't taken literally? In order to be fair, you also need to be consistent.

Should the rules affect everybody equally? The invited players had an advantage before the tournament started. The seeding system also works on things that happened before the tournament. Is that fair? At least winning all games until the grand finals gives advantage based on results in this tournament - et less fatigue, fewer strategies shown, time to prepare while the "semi finalists" are playing.

A tournament is a time efficient and entertaining way of showing great athletes. However, it is not a great way of determining who is best. The results lack validity and reliability because the sample size is too small and most factors are not even included. The athletes are only showing their skills vs a small set of opponents instead of vs everyone, and they have very limited amount of tries to show their skills.
If you are using fairness to mean that the best player should win, another format is required.

We have people saying that some players dislike advantages and others disliking a lack of advantages, so fairness for the well being of the players' mind is not applicable as it is subjective.

I can find no way for fairness to mean that the winner's bracket finalist should get another advantage than being included in the double elimination rule, excluding if other tournaments should also be heavily criticized for their unfairness. Anyrhing else is arbitrary and is not part of "fairness".

Are you even arguing fairness?

Remember that this is showbiz.
This is not necessary for survival, this is not educational, this is not producing anything lasting. This is purely for joy in the moment.


Then who cares about competition integrity, this is just "showbiz".

Competitive integrity is integral to this part of show business. We need rules and structure. We need the core, that players are vying for good placememts and try their best -in game, mind you- to win.

I don't understand why you would sidestep that much, going past all that text and get hung up on an semi-related comment at the end. I only included that because I read a lot of comments about making things so that players get equal opportunity or to make the best player win and other stuff in the same general spirit, neglecting that they had biased views as consumers and their personal tastes. These were arguments that put on a mirage of logic.
Random Platinum EU
Azzur
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia6159 Posts
May 14 2020 17:53 GMT
#92
On May 14 2020 22:50 Drfilip wrote:
Seems like a lot of people have their own view or fairness and try to apply it without explaining which part it is that they are referring to. That doesn't work well when communicating with people that have a different view.

Is it fair that everyone is following the same rules? If so, then there is nothing to complain about.

Should we adhere to literal meanings of words? Double eliminatiin means that you need to lose twice to be out of the tournament. There needs to be a second set played if the winner's bracket finalist loses in the finals.
Also, we need to complain about the tie rules in best of series since the standard rules is that a map tie leads to a replay of that map. This would mean that the players are playing more games than the "best of" name say that they play. If you dislike that DE isn't taken literally, why aren't you equally upset that BO isn't taken literally? In order to be fair, you also need to be consistent.

Should the rules affect everybody equally? The invited players had an advantage before the tournament started. The seeding system also works on things that happened before the tournament. Is that fair? At least winning all games until the grand finals gives advantage based on results in this tournament - et less fatigue, fewer strategies shown, time to prepare while the "semi finalists" are playing.

A tournament is a time efficient and entertaining way of showing great athletes. However, it is not a great way of determining who is best. The results lack validity and reliability because the sample size is too small and most factors are not even included. The athletes are only showing their skills vs a small set of opponents instead of vs everyone, and they have very limited amount of tries to show their skills.
If you are using fairness to mean that the best player should win, another format is required.

We have people saying that some players dislike advantages and others disliking a lack of advantages, so fairness for the well being of the players' mind is not applicable as it is subjective.

I can find no way for fairness to mean that the winner's bracket finalist should get another advantage than being included in the double elimination rule, excluding if other tournaments should also be heavily criticized for their unfairness. Anyrhing else is arbitrary and is not part of "fairness".

Are you even arguing fairness?

Remember that this is showbiz.
This is not necessary for survival, this is not educational, this is not producing anything lasting. This is purely for joy in the moment.

From what I understand of what you're saying, you believe that the viewer experience or "showbiz" is the most important aspect of a tournament. From your post, I couldn't determine what you believe to be the "correct" solution - my reading of your post seem to indicate that you believe the Grand Final current rules is the best solution (bo7 finals without any advantage whatsoever).

However, if you follow some of the ideas out there (including mine), where we suggested giving the Winner Bracket a map pick advantage. I argue that a map pick advantage won't detract much (if at all) from the viewer experience.

I'm sure there are other good ideas out there as well where the Winner Bracket can be given some kind of advantage without affecting the "showbiz".

This lies my point, we should be trying to work out such ideas rather than debate fairness vs showbiz.
mikedupp
Profile Joined May 2020
233 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-05-15 18:11:42
May 15 2020 18:04 GMT
#93
will there be a designated server for cross server play? such as europeans vs koreans? NA West? Central? Also can anyone link me to the rules for this event?

I'm asking because I didn't see any information about the designated server for cross server play on the rules
https://play.eslgaming.com/starcraft/masters/sc2/masters/teamliquid-starleague-5-playoffs/rules/global

Thank you!
[UoN]Sentinel
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
United States11316 Posts
May 15 2020 18:19 GMT
#94
Will the matches all be run one at a time? Would hate to have to choose which of my favorites to watch
Нас зовет дух отцов, память старых бойцов, дух Москвы и твердыня Полтавы
ssg
Profile Joined July 2011
United States1757 Posts
May 15 2020 19:42 GMT
#95
No power rank preview?
[UoN]Sentinel
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
United States11316 Posts
May 15 2020 21:54 GMT
#96
Also is loser round 1 still Bo3 or Bo5? The official bracket and the prediction thread have all the losers' rounds as Bo5, but the description here says Bo3
Нас зовет дух отцов, память старых бойцов, дух Москвы и твердыня Полтавы
CMS_Flash
Profile Joined October 2013
Hong Kong41 Posts
May 18 2020 07:52 GMT
#97
Is Loser's Round 1 Bo3 or Bo5? Seems Bo5 on Liquipedia
My life for Tarsonis.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 10m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ROOTSuperNova 198
RotterdaM 159
ProTech121
Ryung 107
Forgg! 89
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 11853
Sea 5900
Bisu 2607
Hyuk 1317
BeSt 1004
ZerO 766
Soulkey 616
Horang2 590
Shuttle 547
Light 328
[ Show more ]
Mini 315
Leta 169
ToSsGirL 165
Stork 130
Sea.KH 99
hero 95
Hyun 92
Soma 69
sorry 61
ggaemo 59
Sharp 52
Mind 44
Mong 43
Rush 15
Noble 12
ajuk12(nOOB) 7
Hm[arnc] 5
Dota 2
ODPixel632
XcaliburYe591
Attackerdota289
Fuzer 154
canceldota144
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
olofmeister2189
Other Games
Stewie2K3825
singsing3449
DeMusliM642
Pyrionflax567
crisheroes381
Livibee269
XaKoH 211
Organizations
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
ESL CS:GO2302
Other Games
B2W.Neo1582
StarCraft 2
Esl_sc2152
ESL.tv152
StarCraft: Brood War
StarcraftVOD2
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 20 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH341
• Light_VIP 38
• CrowbarSC2 4
• Gussbus
• Laughngamez YouTube
• Poblha
• Alpha X_
• aXEnki
• Migwel
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamez Trovo
StarCraft: Brood War
• sscaitournament3
• STPLYoutube
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• TFBlade3485
• Lourlo1031
Other Games
• WagamamaTV225
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Korean Royale
10m
DongRaeGu vs GuMiho
Ryung vs Scarlett
Dark vs NightMare
GuMiho vs Scarlett
DongRaeGu vs Ryung
Creator vs Maru
Dark vs Creator
NightMare vs Maru
ComeBackTV 356
WardiTV69
IntoTheiNu 53
World Team League
10m
RotterdaM159
Afreeca Starleague
22h 10m
Royal vs Shine
Jaedong vs Action
WardiTV Korean Royale
1d
Classic vs SpeCial
Cure vs Stats
herO vs RagnaroK
SpeCial vs Stats
Classic vs Cure
Solar vs ByuN
herO vs Solar
RagnaroK vs ByuN
Afreeca Starleague
1d 22h
Rush vs Barracks
Queen vs JyJ
WardiTV Winter Champion…
2 days
RagnaroK vs HonMonO
NightMare vs Kelazhur
PassionCraft
2 days
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
WardiTV Winter Champion…
3 days
HeRoMaRinE vs Gerald
Elazer vs INnoVation
WardiTV Korean Royale
4 days
Maru vs Ryung
DongRaeGu vs NightMare
GuMiho vs Dark
Ryung vs NightMare
Maru vs DongRaeGu
Creator vs Scarlett
GuMiho vs Creator
Dark vs Scarlett
[ Show More ]
Sniper's StarCraft League
4 days
ESL Pro Tour
4 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
4 days
Cure vs ByuN
TBD vs RagnaroK
TBD vs herO
Cure vs RagnaroK
ByuN vs TBD
Solar vs Stats
TBD vs Solar
herO vs Stats
BSL: ProLeague
5 days
Bonyth vs TBD
Amantes de StarCraft 2
5 days
ESL Pro Tour
6 days
ESL Pro Tour
6 days
Afreeca Starleague
6 days
Soulkey vs BeSt
Snow vs Light
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Ultimate Battle: Snow vs BarrackS
PiG Sty Festival 3.0
Tournament by teenyeu #2
CCT Central EU Malta Finals

Ongoing

FS Mania
CWCL Season 6
BWCL Season 58
Copa Latinoamericana
ASL Season 15
Individual Silver League
Spring Cup Season 4: China
KCM Ladies Race Survival 2023 Season 1
KCM Race Survival 2023 Season 1
BSL Season 16
Spring Cup Season 4
WardiTV Korean Royale
WardiTV Winter 2023
NGS Storm Division S6
Calamity Cup Division A - Season 5
META Madness #7
ESL Pro League Season 17
ESL Challenger League S44 NA
ESL Challenger League S44 EU
ESL Challenger League S44 AP

Upcoming

CHN vs KOR Week35
KOR-CHN Ladies Invitational League 1: Duck9 vs CoCo
KOR-CHN Invitational League 10: Organ vs Kid
WTL 2023 Summer
LTK Thunderball
BLAST.tv Paris Major 2023
ESL Challenger Melbourne 2023
IEM Rio 2023
BLAST.tv Paris 2023: EU RMR B
BLAST.tv Paris 2023: EU RMR A
BLAST.tv Paris 2023: APAC RMR
BLAST.tv Paris 2023: AME RMR
BLAST Premier Spring AME Showdown
BLAST Premier Spring EU Showdown
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2023 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.