• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 23:24
CEST 05:24
KST 12:24
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles2[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?14FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event22
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form? Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles Program: SC2 / XSplit / OBS Scene Switcher
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WardiTV Mondays Korean Starcraft League Week 77
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 Preliminary Maps [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall SC uni coach streams logging into betting site Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL
Tourneys
[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2024!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 663 users

Shopify TSL 5 - The Bracket - Page 5

Forum Index > SC2 General
96 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 All
BisuDagger
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Bisutopia19229 Posts
May 13 2020 00:25 GMT
#81
On May 13 2020 07:33 ZigguratOfUr wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 13 2020 03:47 BisuDagger wrote:
On May 13 2020 03:10 Elentos wrote:
On May 13 2020 02:15 arcane1129 wrote:
On May 13 2020 01:59 Liquid`TLO wrote:
On May 13 2020 01:34 Ej_ wrote:
On May 13 2020 01:13 Liquid`TLO wrote:
I just want to point out that from my experience SC2 pros don't even like winner bracket advantage. Going through the lower bracket can sometimes be considered a bigger feat than having a perfect run through the upper bracket.
Most pros prefer an even fight for the title.

Need an opinion on the HSC format then (1 map up in bo7)! To me, it always seemed the reasonable middle-ground between winner advantage and time-consrtraint affected doubl series.


perosnally that leave a bitter taste if the finals are decided 4-3 with the winner bracket player winning. To me the finals is the ultimate test between 2 players. It's kind of disappointing to know the winner really just won by drawing 3-3.

The disadvantage having to show way more of your strategies as well as general fatigue from playing a lot more series is underplayed by a lot of people here. (fatigue in the case of TSL not really being case because of the lengthy format but SC2 on the highest level requires way more energy than some people realize.)


I agree that a 3-3 final is lame, but so is the potential for player A to beat player B in winner's finals 3-0 and then lose to player B 3-2 in grands. This would mean they both only lost 1 set (to each other) but the player that went 5-3 head to head lost.

What are your feelings on Bo5 set 1 and bo3 set 2 (if needed) for grands?

You can't plan a tournament around every possible result though. Like taking the format you mentioned, what if player B loses 2-3 initially, then wins 3-0 in the grand finals and then player A wins 2-1 in the extra bo3? "You may have lost the grand finals 2-4 overall player A, but congratulations, you're the champ anyway." is the lamest outcome. Not to mention it's a much less fair format than a Bo7 with 1 game advantage - A can win the finals by winning 2, 3 or 4 maps, B always needs to win 5.

I'd like to see a Bo7 format tested where the winner bracket player has the right to change the map order to some degree (like the 1st seed in GSL group selections can switch 2 players). Create favorable conditions without outright handing them the wins.

I like the map advantage idea too. Even if each player picks every other map, if the winner picks first in a full series they also get to pick the ace map too. It's very similar to home court advantage in the NBA.


You're still playing on the same 7 maps though. Whereas in the NBA you'll play more games on your home court if all games are played. Having more control over the order of the maps is more a psychological advantage than anything else.

Maybe a repeated map by choice might work.
ModeratorFormer Afreeca Starleague Caster: http://afreeca.tv/ASL2ENG2
ZigguratOfUr
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
Iraq16955 Posts
May 13 2020 00:34 GMT
#82
On May 13 2020 07:56 brickrd wrote:
these arguments are funny because frankly even bo7 is statistically not that strong of an indicator of the better player. the only "fair" way would be having every series be a bo49 or something like that, all played on one map. but as people have pointed out for years, tournaments and playoffs aren't about fairness or accuracy, they're about entertainment and drama. players should stfu and win games, fans should stfu and watch


How is that in the slightest relevant? Fairness and being a strong indicator of who the best player is aren't the same thing.
Azzur
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia6259 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-05-13 05:00:45
May 13 2020 04:54 GMT
#83
Earlier on in the thread, I suggested that the Winner Bracket winner should have a slight map pick advantage, and propose map picking order to be A-B-A-B-A-B-A. The theory is they will be able to choose the last map which will be most comfortable for them in the decider.

However, reading the thread further, I like some of the other suggestions. My preferred one:
- Winner Bracket vetoes 1 map and gets to choose a repeat map, which is played on game7.

I think the Winner Bracket deserves some sort of advantage but we don't want to detract from the viewer experience. I don't think this repeat map affects viewers at all - if it gets to g7, it will be a great viewer experience!
ZigguratOfUr
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
Iraq16955 Posts
May 13 2020 05:16 GMT
#84
On May 13 2020 13:54 Azzur wrote:
Earlier on in the thread, I suggested that the Winner Bracket winner should have a slight map pick advantage, and propose map picking order to be A-B-A-B-A-B-A. The theory is they will be able to choose the last map which will be most comfortable for them in the decider.

However, reading the thread further, I like some of the other suggestions. My preferred one:
- Winner Bracket vetoes 1 map and gets to choose a repeat map, which is played on game7.

I think the Winner Bracket deserves some sort of advantage but we don't want to detract from the viewer experience. I don't think this repeat map affects viewers at all - if it gets to g7, it will be a great viewer experience!


That sounds very... variable. Let's say you have INno vs Clem as the finals. The map pick advantage hardly matters. Let's say you have INno vs Serral as the finals. Well good luck Serral, games 1 and 7 are on Purity and Industry.
hjpalpha
Profile Joined August 2017
Germany339 Posts
May 13 2020 06:11 GMT
#85
On May 13 2020 01:13 Liquid`TLO wrote:
I just want to point out that from my experience SC2 pros don't even like winner bracket advantage. Going through the lower bracket can sometimes be considered a bigger feat than having a perfect run through the upper bracket.
Most pros prefer an even fight for the title.


I know several Pros that really dislike the no-advantage you seem to like ...
LiquipediaSCV ready | SC2-Liquipedia Admin, reviewer and editor | Wax called me a Liquipedia wizard in one of his articles for 2019 WCS Standings
Geo.Rion
Profile Blog Joined October 2008
7377 Posts
May 13 2020 06:43 GMT
#86
On May 13 2020 15:11 hjpalpha wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 13 2020 01:13 Liquid`TLO wrote:
I just want to point out that from my experience SC2 pros don't even like winner bracket advantage. Going through the lower bracket can sometimes be considered a bigger feat than having a perfect run through the upper bracket.
Most pros prefer an even fight for the title.


I know several Pros that really dislike the no-advantage you seem to like ...

I know several Pros that really like the no-advantage you seem to dislike ...
"Protoss is a joke" Liquid`Jinro Okt.1. 2011
Azzur
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia6259 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-05-13 07:20:37
May 13 2020 07:05 GMT
#87
On May 13 2020 14:16 ZigguratOfUr wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 13 2020 13:54 Azzur wrote:
Earlier on in the thread, I suggested that the Winner Bracket winner should have a slight map pick advantage, and propose map picking order to be A-B-A-B-A-B-A. The theory is they will be able to choose the last map which will be most comfortable for them in the decider.

However, reading the thread further, I like some of the other suggestions. My preferred one:
- Winner Bracket vetoes 1 map and gets to choose a repeat map, which is played on game7.

I think the Winner Bracket deserves some sort of advantage but we don't want to detract from the viewer experience. I don't think this repeat map affects viewers at all - if it gets to g7, it will be a great viewer experience!


That sounds very... variable. Let's say you have INno vs Clem as the finals. The map pick advantage hardly matters. Let's say you have INno vs Serral as the finals. Well good luck Serral, games 1 and 7 are on Purity and Industry.

Well, there is no such thing as an "ideal" solution since there are competing factors of fairness vs viewer experience.

I think most ppl will agree that the Winner Bracket deserves an advantage, and I think that most ppl will also agree that this advantage should not detract from the viewer experience.

If it's Inno vs Clem, the map picks will allow Inno to have a more comfortable match - the advantage may hardly matter but it's still an advantage regardless?

If Inno vs Serral, even though g1 and g7 is on Purity and Industry, Serral still can win those games? Better than having Inno starting with 1-0 or Serral having to win the Grand final (bo7) and then another match?

And you mention "variable" - I point out that having a random draw is variable already as some players have a preferred matchup, maps, etc.
Ej_
Profile Blog Joined January 2013
47656 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-05-13 17:16:04
May 13 2020 17:15 GMT
#88
On May 13 2020 16:05 Azzur wrote:
If Inno vs Serral, even though g1 and g7 is on Purity and Industry, Serral still can win those games?

Yeah I don't know.
"Technically the dictionary has zero authority on the meaning or words" - Rodya
Drfilip
Profile Joined March 2013
Sweden590 Posts
May 14 2020 13:50 GMT
#89
Seems like a lot of people have their own view or fairness and try to apply it without explaining which part it is that they are referring to. That doesn't work well when communicating with people that have a different view.

Is it fair that everyone is following the same rules? If so, then there is nothing to complain about.

Should we adhere to literal meanings of words? Double eliminatiin means that you need to lose twice to be out of the tournament. There needs to be a second set played if the winner's bracket finalist loses in the finals.
Also, we need to complain about the tie rules in best of series since the standard rules is that a map tie leads to a replay of that map. This would mean that the players are playing more games than the "best of" name say that they play. If you dislike that DE isn't taken literally, why aren't you equally upset that BO isn't taken literally? In order to be fair, you also need to be consistent.

Should the rules affect everybody equally? The invited players had an advantage before the tournament started. The seeding system also works on things that happened before the tournament. Is that fair? At least winning all games until the grand finals gives advantage based on results in this tournament - et less fatigue, fewer strategies shown, time to prepare while the "semi finalists" are playing.

A tournament is a time efficient and entertaining way of showing great athletes. However, it is not a great way of determining who is best. The results lack validity and reliability because the sample size is too small and most factors are not even included. The athletes are only showing their skills vs a small set of opponents instead of vs everyone, and they have very limited amount of tries to show their skills.
If you are using fairness to mean that the best player should win, another format is required.

We have people saying that some players dislike advantages and others disliking a lack of advantages, so fairness for the well being of the players' mind is not applicable as it is subjective.

I can find no way for fairness to mean that the winner's bracket finalist should get another advantage than being included in the double elimination rule, excluding if other tournaments should also be heavily criticized for their unfairness. Anyrhing else is arbitrary and is not part of "fairness".

Are you even arguing fairness?

Remember that this is showbiz.
This is not necessary for survival, this is not educational, this is not producing anything lasting. This is purely for joy in the moment.
Random Platinum EU
stilt
Profile Joined October 2012
France2749 Posts
May 14 2020 13:54 GMT
#90
On May 14 2020 22:50 Drfilip wrote:
Seems like a lot of people have their own view or fairness and try to apply it without explaining which part it is that they are referring to. That doesn't work well when communicating with people that have a different view.

Is it fair that everyone is following the same rules? If so, then there is nothing to complain about.

Should we adhere to literal meanings of words? Double eliminatiin means that you need to lose twice to be out of the tournament. There needs to be a second set played if the winner's bracket finalist loses in the finals.
Also, we need to complain about the tie rules in best of series since the standard rules is that a map tie leads to a replay of that map. This would mean that the players are playing more games than the "best of" name say that they play. If you dislike that DE isn't taken literally, why aren't you equally upset that BO isn't taken literally? In order to be fair, you also need to be consistent.

Should the rules affect everybody equally? The invited players had an advantage before the tournament started. The seeding system also works on things that happened before the tournament. Is that fair? At least winning all games until the grand finals gives advantage based on results in this tournament - et less fatigue, fewer strategies shown, time to prepare while the "semi finalists" are playing.

A tournament is a time efficient and entertaining way of showing great athletes. However, it is not a great way of determining who is best. The results lack validity and reliability because the sample size is too small and most factors are not even included. The athletes are only showing their skills vs a small set of opponents instead of vs everyone, and they have very limited amount of tries to show their skills.
If you are using fairness to mean that the best player should win, another format is required.

We have people saying that some players dislike advantages and others disliking a lack of advantages, so fairness for the well being of the players' mind is not applicable as it is subjective.

I can find no way for fairness to mean that the winner's bracket finalist should get another advantage than being included in the double elimination rule, excluding if other tournaments should also be heavily criticized for their unfairness. Anyrhing else is arbitrary and is not part of "fairness".

Are you even arguing fairness?

Remember that this is showbiz.
This is not necessary for survival, this is not educational, this is not producing anything lasting. This is purely for joy in the moment.


Then who cares about competition integrity, this is just "showbiz".
Drfilip
Profile Joined March 2013
Sweden590 Posts
May 14 2020 15:32 GMT
#91
On May 14 2020 22:54 stilt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 14 2020 22:50 Drfilip wrote:
Seems like a lot of people have their own view or fairness and try to apply it without explaining which part it is that they are referring to. That doesn't work well when communicating with people that have a different view.

Is it fair that everyone is following the same rules? If so, then there is nothing to complain about.

Should we adhere to literal meanings of words? Double eliminatiin means that you need to lose twice to be out of the tournament. There needs to be a second set played if the winner's bracket finalist loses in the finals.
Also, we need to complain about the tie rules in best of series since the standard rules is that a map tie leads to a replay of that map. This would mean that the players are playing more games than the "best of" name say that they play. If you dislike that DE isn't taken literally, why aren't you equally upset that BO isn't taken literally? In order to be fair, you also need to be consistent.

Should the rules affect everybody equally? The invited players had an advantage before the tournament started. The seeding system also works on things that happened before the tournament. Is that fair? At least winning all games until the grand finals gives advantage based on results in this tournament - et less fatigue, fewer strategies shown, time to prepare while the "semi finalists" are playing.

A tournament is a time efficient and entertaining way of showing great athletes. However, it is not a great way of determining who is best. The results lack validity and reliability because the sample size is too small and most factors are not even included. The athletes are only showing their skills vs a small set of opponents instead of vs everyone, and they have very limited amount of tries to show their skills.
If you are using fairness to mean that the best player should win, another format is required.

We have people saying that some players dislike advantages and others disliking a lack of advantages, so fairness for the well being of the players' mind is not applicable as it is subjective.

I can find no way for fairness to mean that the winner's bracket finalist should get another advantage than being included in the double elimination rule, excluding if other tournaments should also be heavily criticized for their unfairness. Anyrhing else is arbitrary and is not part of "fairness".

Are you even arguing fairness?

Remember that this is showbiz.
This is not necessary for survival, this is not educational, this is not producing anything lasting. This is purely for joy in the moment.


Then who cares about competition integrity, this is just "showbiz".

Competitive integrity is integral to this part of show business. We need rules and structure. We need the core, that players are vying for good placememts and try their best -in game, mind you- to win.

I don't understand why you would sidestep that much, going past all that text and get hung up on an semi-related comment at the end. I only included that because I read a lot of comments about making things so that players get equal opportunity or to make the best player win and other stuff in the same general spirit, neglecting that they had biased views as consumers and their personal tastes. These were arguments that put on a mirage of logic.
Random Platinum EU
Azzur
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia6259 Posts
May 14 2020 17:53 GMT
#92
On May 14 2020 22:50 Drfilip wrote:
Seems like a lot of people have their own view or fairness and try to apply it without explaining which part it is that they are referring to. That doesn't work well when communicating with people that have a different view.

Is it fair that everyone is following the same rules? If so, then there is nothing to complain about.

Should we adhere to literal meanings of words? Double eliminatiin means that you need to lose twice to be out of the tournament. There needs to be a second set played if the winner's bracket finalist loses in the finals.
Also, we need to complain about the tie rules in best of series since the standard rules is that a map tie leads to a replay of that map. This would mean that the players are playing more games than the "best of" name say that they play. If you dislike that DE isn't taken literally, why aren't you equally upset that BO isn't taken literally? In order to be fair, you also need to be consistent.

Should the rules affect everybody equally? The invited players had an advantage before the tournament started. The seeding system also works on things that happened before the tournament. Is that fair? At least winning all games until the grand finals gives advantage based on results in this tournament - et less fatigue, fewer strategies shown, time to prepare while the "semi finalists" are playing.

A tournament is a time efficient and entertaining way of showing great athletes. However, it is not a great way of determining who is best. The results lack validity and reliability because the sample size is too small and most factors are not even included. The athletes are only showing their skills vs a small set of opponents instead of vs everyone, and they have very limited amount of tries to show their skills.
If you are using fairness to mean that the best player should win, another format is required.

We have people saying that some players dislike advantages and others disliking a lack of advantages, so fairness for the well being of the players' mind is not applicable as it is subjective.

I can find no way for fairness to mean that the winner's bracket finalist should get another advantage than being included in the double elimination rule, excluding if other tournaments should also be heavily criticized for their unfairness. Anyrhing else is arbitrary and is not part of "fairness".

Are you even arguing fairness?

Remember that this is showbiz.
This is not necessary for survival, this is not educational, this is not producing anything lasting. This is purely for joy in the moment.

From what I understand of what you're saying, you believe that the viewer experience or "showbiz" is the most important aspect of a tournament. From your post, I couldn't determine what you believe to be the "correct" solution - my reading of your post seem to indicate that you believe the Grand Final current rules is the best solution (bo7 finals without any advantage whatsoever).

However, if you follow some of the ideas out there (including mine), where we suggested giving the Winner Bracket a map pick advantage. I argue that a map pick advantage won't detract much (if at all) from the viewer experience.

I'm sure there are other good ideas out there as well where the Winner Bracket can be given some kind of advantage without affecting the "showbiz".

This lies my point, we should be trying to work out such ideas rather than debate fairness vs showbiz.
mikedupp
Profile Joined May 2020
233 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-05-15 18:11:42
May 15 2020 18:04 GMT
#93
will there be a designated server for cross server play? such as europeans vs koreans? NA West? Central? Also can anyone link me to the rules for this event?

I'm asking because I didn't see any information about the designated server for cross server play on the rules
https://play.eslgaming.com/starcraft/masters/sc2/masters/teamliquid-starleague-5-playoffs/rules/global

Thank you!
[UoN]Sentinel
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
United States11320 Posts
May 15 2020 18:19 GMT
#94
Will the matches all be run one at a time? Would hate to have to choose which of my favorites to watch
Нас зовет дух отцов, память старых бойцов, дух Москвы и твердыня Полтавы
ssg
Profile Joined July 2011
United States1770 Posts
May 15 2020 19:42 GMT
#95
No power rank preview?
[UoN]Sentinel
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
United States11320 Posts
May 15 2020 21:54 GMT
#96
Also is loser round 1 still Bo3 or Bo5? The official bracket and the prediction thread have all the losers' rounds as Bo5, but the description here says Bo3
Нас зовет дух отцов, память старых бойцов, дух Москвы и твердыня Полтавы
CMS_Flash
Profile Joined October 2013
Hong Kong47 Posts
May 18 2020 07:52 GMT
#97
Is Loser's Round 1 Bo3 or Bo5? Seems Bo5 on Liquipedia
My life for Tarsonis.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
Korean StarCraft League #77
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft415
RuFF_SC2 187
ProTech61
StarCraft: Brood War
GuemChi 634
Sharp 93
MaD[AoV]48
Bale 16
Icarus 8
LuMiX 1
Dota 2
monkeys_forever683
League of Legends
JimRising 774
Counter-Strike
Coldzera 247
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King123
Other Games
summit1g9541
shahzam793
WinterStarcraft312
Maynarde154
NeuroSwarm67
SortOf23
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick43237
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH281
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos1311
Other Games
• Scarra2075
• Shiphtur262
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6h 36m
WardiTV European League
12h 36m
MaNa vs sebesdes
Mixu vs Fjant
ByuN vs HeRoMaRinE
ShoWTimE vs goblin
Gerald vs Babymarine
Krystianer vs YoungYakov
PiGosaur Monday
20h 36m
The PondCast
1d 6h
WardiTV European League
1d 8h
Jumy vs NightPhoenix
Percival vs Nicoract
ArT vs HiGhDrA
MaxPax vs Harstem
Scarlett vs Shameless
SKillous vs uThermal
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 12h
Replay Cast
1d 20h
RSL Revival
2 days
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Classic vs Cure
[ Show More ]
FEL
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
FEL
4 days
FEL
4 days
CSO Cup
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
FEL
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL Season 20
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.