• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 11:12
CEST 17:12
KST 00:12
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall9HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL50Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?12FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event16Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster16Weekly Cups (June 16-22): Clem strikes back1
StarCraft 2
General
The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings How does the number of casters affect your enjoyment of esports? Statistics for vetoed/disliked maps Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Semi Finals & Finals $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event HomeStory Cup 27 (June 27-29)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady
Brood War
General
Player “Jedi” cheat on CSL BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Unit and Spell Similarities Help: rep cant save Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL
Tourneys
[BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Trading/Investing Thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Blogs
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 804 users

The Curious Case of soO's Macro Mechanics - Page 7

Forum Index > SC2 General
534 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 27 Next All
Morn_sc
Profile Blog Joined March 2015
United States40 Posts
August 04 2015 00:54 GMT
#121
Thank you.
Spawningtool3 marines vs lurker, round one: FIGHT!
lichter
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
August 04 2015 01:04 GMT
#122
I would prefer that Blizzard try to slow down the game speed (either the game speed itself, or all/most speed/time related attributes) instead of removing rote mechanics. Slowing down the game speed does more than allow players to do more with their time. It also elongates battles (one common criticism of the game), gives players a fraction more time to make decisions (as I've argued before, speed of thought is a greater bottleneck in SC2 than speed of hands), and makes the game more easy to observe and explain.
AdministratorYOU MUST HEED MY INSTRUCTIONS TAKE OFF YOUR THIIIINGS
Cluster__
Profile Joined September 2013
United States328 Posts
August 04 2015 01:15 GMT
#123
excellent article. couldn't agree more. gg
Liquid`Snute, AcerScarlett, ROOTCatZ, MC, Maru, Soulkey, Losira
eg9
Profile Joined February 2011
Norway43 Posts
August 04 2015 01:32 GMT
#124
Interesting article. I think there is some merit to what is said in the article. Personally I only really feel like i have something to say from the zerg perspective. I was a player who climbed from silver to high masters and both experienced for myself and saw others struggle to learn the macro part of the game. One of the sad things I feel about the entire thing is that the macro for a zerg is the completely dominating factor in the game. To improve your injects would not be something that you did to squeeze that extra bit out of your builds (the same way you can skip a spine or some lings early to squeeze that early +1 upgrade out). It is rather a prequesite for playing the game.

While it can be very rewarding to after countless hours of practice to simply overwhelm your opponent with units, it feels like at the sub-pro level the mechanical aspect of the macro part of the game is so completely dominating. One of the things i love the most about Starcraft is trying to design and make builds and strategies to execute in the game. The fact that forgetting a round of injects for 15 seconds at the 4-5 minute can be worth as much as a spire if they were drones mean that either you plan your builds exetremely loosely or you never have enough resources in a game where you are being pressured by an opponent. I spent YEARS working pretty much purely on my mechanics before i reached the point where i was able to execute even semi-consistent builds even just into the 4-5 minute mark.

This rant is getting a bit out of hand but what i guess i am trying to say is that i wish inject larva was less dominating in the game. I think it is important to have the macro mechanics there, because the feeling of mastering those mechanics is amazing, however i wish they felt more like an option. Maybe the larva could spawn faster from the hatchery and in stead inject larva only spawned two larva or something like that. That way, in stead of you straight up losing without it even being close if you forgot an inject in the fight you would be left with 3-4 units left which is a disadvantage, but one that you can make up for with micro, tactics and well planned trades.

Ohh, that that thing about protoss/terran macro being harder because you have to look at your workers when you build pylons/depots, that is absolute bullshit. Zergs have to look at their base to inject and spread creep, and on top of that you have that fucking .4 second delay between the time when an inject finishes and the queen has enough energy for more spawn larva that you have to wait for. (ohh my poor queens always running to the wrong hatcheries because of that design flaw)
StasisField
Profile Joined August 2013
United States1086 Posts
August 04 2015 01:33 GMT
#125
On August 04 2015 10:04 lichter wrote:
I would prefer that Blizzard try to slow down the game speed (either the game speed itself, or all/most speed/time related attributes) instead of removing rote mechanics. Slowing down the game speed does more than allow players to do more with their time. It also elongates battles (one common criticism of the game), gives players a fraction more time to make decisions (as I've argued before, speed of thought is a greater bottleneck in SC2 than speed of hands), and makes the game more easy to observe and explain.

Agreed. One of the things I like about Warcraft 3, for example, was the slower overall pace of the entire game. A slower game wouldn't change how many workers you need or production or units. It would just, make it slower and I don't honestly see a problem with that at the moment.
What do you mean Immortals can't shoot up?
lichter
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
August 04 2015 01:57 GMT
#126
I actually hated WC3 (I played WC2 a lot as a kid) xD

but that's beside the point. Making the game feel slower does more to lower the barrier to entry than removing mechanics without sacrificing a projected skill ceiling or competitive skill floor.
AdministratorYOU MUST HEED MY INSTRUCTIONS TAKE OFF YOUR THIIIINGS
SetGuitarsToKill
Profile Blog Joined December 2013
Canada28396 Posts
August 04 2015 01:59 GMT
#127
I agree with Lichter. LotV is just way too fast pace and makes it a pain in the ass to play a lot of the time.
Community News"As long as you have a warp prism you can't be bad at harassment" - Maru | @SetGuitars2Kill
BisuDagger
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Bisutopia19229 Posts
August 04 2015 02:03 GMT
#128
On August 04 2015 10:59 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:
I agree with Lichter. LotV is just way too fast pace and makes it a pain in the ass to play a lot of the time.

Slowing the pace is also an way for the viewer to grasp more throughout the game. By either slowing game speed or reducing DPS, more actions can be conducted in a single moment. I've always been an advocate for reducing DPS as a whole.
ModeratorFormer Afreeca Starleague Caster: http://afreeca.tv/ASL2ENG2
Asunanas
Profile Joined April 2011
53 Posts
August 04 2015 02:16 GMT
#129
Great write up!

I think that something this article highlights very well is that macro mechanics allow players to easily distinguish their skill level difference.
For example, a better player will essentially be able to beat a worst player with random units (Destiny WoL mass queens) simply because they have "more" things.

Having "more" things is very clearly distinguishable by skill when you watch players do similar strategies, and allows a pros to distinguish themselves when picking from a certain "meta" of builds, as some players will simply have the macro mechanics to do it better e.g. the soO ling/bling example in the article.
BisuDagger
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Bisutopia19229 Posts
August 04 2015 02:32 GMT
#130
I would be an advocate of change that made macro hatcheries a bigger deal. I could see that balancing out the macro give and take.
ModeratorFormer Afreeca Starleague Caster: http://afreeca.tv/ASL2ENG2
Koromon
Profile Joined May 2012
United States304 Posts
August 04 2015 02:35 GMT
#131
Cool read, but I always thought Bomber was #1 in terms of terran macro mechanics?
Deleted User 132135
Profile Joined December 2010
702 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-08-04 03:23:51
August 04 2015 02:36 GMT
#132
There are advantages and disadvantages of automated larva inject. Your article is nothing but one sided.

E.g. when a zerg is getting attacked he not only takes the damage dealt by the attacking units but also the damage that is being dealt by drawing his attention away from injects. This can be compared with if terran/protoss gets attacked their barracks/gateways would go on hold for a few seconds. You don't have to build depots/pylons exactly at the moment of fighting or defending mostly as terran or protoss but can do it a few seconds before or afterwards. Injects need to be done exactly at that very moment tho in theory. So damage is multiplied and games can sometimes end early and in a boring way due to it.


Automated larva injects would make games less volatile (can player inject well enough while fighting or not?) with less multiplicative damage. In this scenario e.g. queens range could be reduced back to the old value so that harrassment become more attractive. Those harrassment would less likely be game ending but allow more predictable outcomes. Predictibility allows better balancing of the whole game in return while it doesn't take away of the micro and execution on both sides.

In lategame situations where players are on 200 supply, the pylon and depot building also isn't of any major importance anymore. Supplying 5+ hatchs with larvas constantly tho still is and takes away alot of potential from a zerg player that could be used for other tasks. Also in this case games can end in a boring way that cannot be easily understood by watchers (why did the zerg lose after this 30-60 seconds 200/200 fight that went pretty even? - he didn't inject larva meanwhiles).


In the future of esports and gaming in general macro mechanics should and will have a decreasing role.

Why?
Only a very limited group of players is capable of keeping up mechanics by doing it as kinda a full time job. This is mostly teens and full-time progamers that can or must spend their time on training daily for several hours in order to keep it up. If you can't keep this up you cannot play sc2 competitively and there is not much reason to continue to play sc2 at all, when realizing it. So sc2 loses out on all of these players basically. Players at the age of 30+, players who cannot train like maniacs etc. This is something that future competitive gaming will hardly be able to afford on a scale on that sc2 is when thinking in terms target groups and limiting them unreasonably.


Difficulty of mechanics can not only be reduced for zerg by automating larva injects but I am sure also for the other two races (protoss has it already actually) in different ways. Therefore everyone that is participating could benefit from it and it is not a one sided thing at all. In fact I believe that stategic depth and interesting games can be more easily generated when players have to focus less on macro mechanics but can put more attention on micro and strategical execution of attacks and defences. Again this would make games more logical, less volatile and in the end creates satisfying outcomes. This can only be achieved by reducing the macro tasks.

Alot of modern games such as company of heroes or heroes of the storm (just two examples) completely don't rely on macro mechanics but take all their appeal out of pure micro management and strategy. If you don't believe that a rebalance of sc2 around lessened macro mechanics can be successful, then you don't believe in the quality of sc2 itself. After all is every second that is spend on macro mechanics technically wasted time that could be used creatively in order to refine strategy, timings, positioning etc. As you mentioned the macro becomes only visible at a match between players of different level. But you haven't answered why Sc2 is a game that must involve macro mechanics to a that high extend so that it functions as an entry barrier to play at all and as a predefining condition of victory. Real strategic depth and outclassing the opponent in thinking and strategy imo is a way better criterion than the ability of using the mouse and keyboard at the fastest possible speed.


I am not decided in the matter yet, especially as an old WC2 and BW players I also support the arguments against automated larva injects. For me it is just important to show up that this article isn't written fair and by far not all aspects of the issue are being shown. So to speak it is opinionated and a bit narrow minded and written with reluctance to change and thus the end another time justifies the means of unfair coverage and creating sentiments. This in the end makes the work of blizzard more hard than it already is. TL is for sure a thing to them and working against TL for blizzard is for sure nothing they do with pleasure. The more important it is to understand that these opinions are being staged to a good extend and just followed by others without using their brain.


In this sense:
"Lovely writeup, I am glad to see there are still people in the community with brain, rare as that occurence might be."

The only ones without brain here is you and the other guys that blindly follow the mock without trying to understand new possible ways for sc2 and with elitist thinking of what you have had to learn others after you should better get used to as well or gtfo and play another noob game. ^^


Jonas :)
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States511 Posts
August 04 2015 02:37 GMT
#133
Thanks for making this post, I agree 100%

Simplifying the macro mechanics will not make the game easier for newbees.... an RTS is going to be overwhelming and stressful the first times that you play it regardless of how "simple" you make it. Removing or reducing the dependency on macro is only going to lower the skill ceiling, which will removing the ability of pros to differentiate themselves from NA GM's.
BisuDagger
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Bisutopia19229 Posts
August 04 2015 02:43 GMT
#134
On August 04 2015 11:36 LSN wrote:
There are advantages and disadvantages of automated larva inject. Your article is nothing but one sided.

E.g. when a zerg is getting attacked he not only takes the damage dealt by the attacking units but also the damage that is being dealt by drawing his attention away from injects. This can be compared with if terran/protoss gets attacked their barracks/gateways would go on hold for a few seconds. You don't have to build depots/pylons exactly at the moment of fighting or defending mostly as terran or protoss but can do it a few seconds before or afterwards. Injects need to be done exactly at that very moment tho in theory. So damage is multiplied and games can sometimes end early and in a boring way due to it.


Automated larva injects would make games less volatile (can player inject well enough while fighting or not?) with less multiplicative damage. In this scenario e.g. queens range could be reduced back to the old value so that harrassment become more attractive. Those harrassment would less likely be game ending but allow more predictable outcomes. Predictibility allows better balancing of the whole game in return while it doesn't take away of the micro and execution on both sides.

In lategame situations where players are on 200 supply, the pylon and depot building also isn't of any major importance anymore. Supplying 5+ hatchs with larvas constantly tho still is and takes away alot of potential from a zerg player that could be used for other tasks. Also in this case games can end in a boring way that cannot be easily understood by watchers (why did the zerg lose after this 30-60 seconds 200/200 fight that went pretty even? - he didn't inject larva meanwhiles).


In the future of esports and gaming in general macro mechanics should and will have a decreasing role.

Why?
Only a very limited group of players is capable of keeping up mechanics by doing it as kinda a full time job. This is mostly teens and full-time progamers that can or must spend their time on training daily for several hours in order to keep it up. If you can't keep this up you cannot play sc2 competitively and there is not much reason to continue to play sc2 at all, when realizing it. So sc2 loses out on all of these players basically. Players at the age of 30+, players who cannot train like maniacs etc. This is something that future competitive gaming will hardly be able to afford on a scale on that sc2 is when thinking in terms target groups and limiting them unreasonably.


Difficulty of mechanics can not only be reduced for zerg by automating larva injects but I am sure also for the other two races (protoss has it already actually) in different ways. Therefore everyone that is participating could benefit from it and it is not a one sided thing at all. In fact I believe that stategic depth and interesting games can be more easily generated when players have to focus less on macro mechanics but can put more attention on micro and strategical execution of attacks and defences. Again this would make games more logical, less volatile and in the end creates satisfying outcomes. This can only be achieved by reducing the macro tasks.

Alot of modern games such as company of heroes or heroes of the storm (just two examples) completely don't rely on macro mechanics but take all their appeal out of pure micro management and strategy. If you don't believe that a rebalance of sc2 around lessened macro mechanics can be successful, then you don't believe in the quality of sc2 itself. After all is every second that is spend on macro mechanics technically wasted time that could be used creatively in order to refine strategy, timings, positioning etc. As you mentioned the macro becomes only visible at a match between players of different level. But you haven't answered why Sc2 is a game that must involve macro mechanics to a that high extend so that it functions as an entry barrier to play at all and as a predefining condition of victory. Real strategic depth and outclassing the opponent in thinking and strategy imo is a way better criterion than the ability of using the mouse and keyboard at the fastest possible speed.


I am not decided in the matter yet, especially as an old WC2 and BW players I also support the arguments against automated larva injects. For me it is just important to show up that this article isn't written fair and by far not all aspects of the issue are being shown. So to speak another opinionated tl.net article by narrow minded staff that likes to get stuck with things that they do understand and is reluctant to change and thus the end another time justifies the means of unfair coverage and creating sentiments. This in the end makes the work of blizzard more hard than it already is. TL is for sure a thing to them and working against TL for blizzard is for sure nothing they do with pleasure. The more important it is that these opinions are being staged here for one or another reason and alot of guys just follow without using their own brain.


In this sense:
"Lovely writeup, I am glad to see there are still people in the community with brain, rare as that occurence might be."

The only ones without brain here is you and all the other guys that blindly follow the mock.


Your point would have gotten across without the bitter name calling. These are volunteer writers. Not paid staff. They work hard and try to bring perspective to current issues. I'm sure it's easy to forget that so I just thought I'd remind you. There is no other agenda on TL then to give enthusiastic contributions from people who love SC2.
ModeratorFormer Afreeca Starleague Caster: http://afreeca.tv/ASL2ENG2
Deleted User 132135
Profile Joined December 2010
702 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-08-04 03:04:40
August 04 2015 02:54 GMT
#135
It is not important for me who likes me on tl and who doesn't and if writers are being paid or not. If an article is opinionated and narrow minded like that I have not much left but naming it - if noone else does it.

I even agree to most of the points. It is just that there are in fact many arguments that go for lessened macro mechanics which are at 100% convenience being opressed in the article.

That he didn't write a single line about what goes for blizzard's idea gives a bit of evidence for the all so bad words that I used to describe it.

Nothing personal stuchio, I appreciate your writups here nevertheless, but things are in fact not as one sided as you put them.
nottapro
Profile Joined August 2012
202 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-08-04 03:01:15
August 04 2015 02:54 GMT
#136
This opinion states without any discretion in the opening paragraphs that yes; these mechanics are not fun, its hard to tell whats going on and that they make the game extremely difficult to play, but we should keep them because well he said so, even though they are a drag on the enjoyment of almost every player in the game.

And if you disagree, well... anything you say that he doesn't like "is not an argument."

It just demonstrates how difficult of a time people are having to justify game mechanics that don't work.
lichter
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
August 04 2015 03:09 GMT
#137
There's a reason this is called an editorial
AdministratorYOU MUST HEED MY INSTRUCTIONS TAKE OFF YOUR THIIIINGS
Deleted User 132135
Profile Joined December 2010
702 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-08-04 03:14:50
August 04 2015 03:12 GMT
#138
Sure, it is all good. Some things have to be said at certain points of time and this is what I did. There is a reason it is called comment.


You wont ever get an I agree so much and I love you all and lets smoke pot together comment from me. D:
lichter
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
August 04 2015 03:14 GMT
#139
What I mean is, it's an editorial so it's bound to have a polarizing opinion and not a balanced one. Comments of course will be the same. No problems with that, as long as it's clear.
AdministratorYOU MUST HEED MY INSTRUCTIONS TAKE OFF YOUR THIIIINGS
Redfish
Profile Joined April 2010
United States142 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-08-04 03:17:43
August 04 2015 03:17 GMT
#140
The simple fact of the matter is that Starcraft 2 continues to wane in popularity and viewership, and that isn't going to change if the status quo remains. I agree with some parts of this opinion post, and disagree with other parts, but there is one quote I vehemently, wholeheartedly disagree with, and that is this:

"These macromechanics also do not serve as a barrier to entry because players can play without any knowledge of inject, mules or chronoboost."

Turning on the game does not equal playing it. Yes, as a total noob, I can load up the game and play someone and have no idea what I'm doing. But, the game is designed for me to know what I'm doing, and to do it well, while doing four or five other things at the same time. That's the nature of SC2.

But, if I'm not nailing my injects or spending my Orbital energy on cue or timing my Chronos perfectly, then not only am I not really experiencing the game as it is designed to be experienced, but I'm getting inaccurate feedback as to the balance and fun of the game.

The reality is that we need new players if we're not going to wither even further into a niche game, lagging even further behind LoL, DotA, Hearthstone, Heroes, CS:GO, or whatever. We're not going to get any meaningful amount of new players if it takes playing at even 60+ APM to not get stomped in the dregs of bronze, and no casual gamer is going to spend months losing 50+ games to figure it out. They'll get frustrated and move on - I've seen it with friends and family that I've tried to get into the game.

Thus, these macro mechanics DO serve as a barrier to entry. The crucial nature with which they impact gameplay makes it so you HAVE to learn them well if you're not going to lose an overwhelming portion of your games. If we're going to have a game as fast paced as SC2 is, it's folly to think that a bunch of new people will want to play if it's the same as it always is (except faster in the early game). Holding on to these mechanics out of shortsighted nostalgia is akin to an old, failing restaurant keeping an old, boring menu because they're afraid the few geezers who still eat there might leave if they change it. It's not forward-thinking, and it's not good for Starcraft's future.
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 27 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
13:00
King of the Hill #216
davetesta82
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Lowko647
Hui .274
RotterdaM 166
Vindicta 41
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 57188
Calm 5402
Rain 3345
EffOrt 1435
Horang2 1392
Shuttle 1306
Hyuk 699
Larva 578
BeSt 323
Nal_rA 271
[ Show more ]
hero 196
Light 174
Mini 168
ToSsGirL 113
Mind 97
Rush 83
Mong 80
Snow 71
Hyun 61
Shinee 52
Barracks 52
Movie 45
soO 33
JYJ27
Shine 13
HiyA 12
yabsab 11
Backho 9
SilentControl 9
zelot 8
IntoTheRainbow 8
Dota 2
Gorgc9306
qojqva3271
League of Legends
singsing2721
Counter-Strike
zeus255
Foxcn84
edward49
Other Games
Grubby2846
B2W.Neo1512
hiko870
Fuzer 316
XaKoH 279
QueenE35
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• Michael_bg 7
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2723
• WagamamaTV486
League of Legends
• Nemesis7073
• Jankos1180
• TFBlade787
Upcoming Events
WardiTV European League
48m
Scarlett vs Percival
Jumy vs ArT
YoungYakov vs Shameless
uThermal vs Fjant
Nicoract vs goblin
Harstem vs Gerald
FEL
48m
Big Brain Bouts
48m
RotterdaM166
Korean StarCraft League
11h 48m
CranKy Ducklings
18h 48m
RSL Revival
18h 48m
ByuN vs Cham
herO vs Reynor
FEL
1d
RSL Revival
1d 18h
Clem vs Classic
SHIN vs Cure
FEL
1d 20h
BSL: ProLeague
2 days
Dewalt vs Bonyth
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-06-28
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.