IEM Katowice - Bracket revealed - Page 14

On March 06 2015 06:03 Yhamm wrote:

it's 2015 now
I would add that the bracket is done to know the best IEM player, not the best player in the world. You have the WCS Global Finals for this

On March 06 2015 06:10 Yhamm wrote:

and he's not rated higher in IEM, they have the same seed
I have no idea why I'm continuing this pointless discussion

On March 06 2015 06:10 Elentos wrote:
I mean, if I had to choose IEM's first seeded player, I'd go with CJ herO who has won more IEMs total than anyone else and was runner-up of last year's World Championship. Then it's between TaeJa and Life who both won an IEM and both took 3rd/4th in Toronto, so you'd seed TaeJa higher for doing better than Life in the previous IEM World Championship. Then Life over Flash because Flash only placed high in Toronto. And then you'd proceed in a similar manner for everyone else I guess. And INnoVation gets seeded lower because he cancelled his participation for Taipei, which is why he plays Life. The conspiracy is on <.<

On March 06 2015 06:17 sharkie wrote:


Two persons can not have the same seed...
Seed is singular, it is impossible for one person to have the same seed.

They clearly had to assign #1 to someone and #2 to someone and #3 to someone and #4 to someone. (out of the four winners)



Exactly. Life and herO should never ever be on the same side of the bracket.

On March 06 2015 06:49 hborrgg wrote:
Online qualifier locations added:

San Jose 1st
EU 3rd
|
Shenzen 2nd
AM

Toronto 2nd
EU
|
Tiapei 1st
KR

Toronto 1st
AM
|
San Jose 2nd
EU

Tiapei 2nd
KR
|
Shenzen 1st
KR 3rd


Yeah, the seeding for those seems a bit random, they probably needed to weight the KR qualifiers a bit more.

On March 06 2015 07:22 KingofdaHipHop wrote:
I think people are reading into the seeding too much. It seems like they literally give the four winners seeds 1-4, and it was random what seed they get. And each player gets put a tier, but it's random what seed they get. I fail to see how this isn't fair and it certainly makes a lot of sense rather an arbitrarily giving rankings based on performance or to "adjust the bracket so it's even".

On March 06 2015 07:22 KingofdaHipHop wrote:
I think people are reading into the seeding too much. It seems like they literally give the four winners seeds 1-4, and it was random what seed they get. And each player gets put a tier, but it's random what seed they get. I fail to see how this isn't fair and it certainly makes a lot of sense rather an arbitrarily giving rankings based on performance or to "adjust the bracket so it's even".

On March 06 2015 07:30 Elentos wrote:

If I can find a system to easily seed the 4 winners, so can they. Really, seeding herO and TaeJa 1st and 2nd for their overall IEM success would be obvious and they are the highest seeded players. On the other side, INnoVation is one of the top 5 players in the world right now and Trap is on a roll, and the two of them get seeded lower than Patience, Hydra, Bbyong and Fantasy. This means top 4 seeded players Life and Flash get stronger opponents than seeds 5-8. This isn't inherently unfair, but it's unfortunate because it causes matches like Life vs INnoVation which might as well be the grand finals to take place in round 1.

On March 06 2015 07:50 KingofdaHipHop wrote:

That happens in all competition tho, if you're gonna have a bracket sometimes it might be a little stronger in some places than others. Is it unfortunate? Maybe, but I'd rather have it like this than for them to have some sort of double standard because "they think one player is better" instead of leveling everybody's "chances" so to speak.