• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 20:11
CEST 02:11
KST 09:11
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202530RSL Season 1 - Final Week8[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams2Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster Why doesnt SC2 scene costream tournaments
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame
Brood War
General
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL Corsair Pursuit Micro?
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread BWCL Season 63 Announcement
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 625 users

6 possible balance changes - David Kim - Page 30

Forum Index > SC2 General
1350 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 28 29 30 31 32 68 Next
hansonslee
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States2027 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-24 00:07:30
September 24 2013 00:06 GMT
#581
On September 24 2013 08:57 IshinShishi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 24 2013 08:56 hansonslee wrote:
It's sad how worked up the community is being with this patch. Blizzard is trying really hard to make Toss less deathball with more harassment options.

If anyone is killing eSports, it's the community who doesn't give these changes a chance.

the problem is that they can still go for the deathball just fine, this changes nothing, just allows for more gimmicky stuff which we already see so much.


Yeah, Protoss is "gimmicky" at times, but here's the problem., It relies on either "build orders" or "deathballs". Giving harassment options will give Toss more midgame options and more variety.

Furthermore, we still see very few solid Toss such as Rain, and they are damn too predictable.
Seed's # 1 fan!!! #ForVengeance
Blargh
Profile Joined September 2010
United States2102 Posts
September 24 2013 00:07 GMT
#582
Classic bad ideas from blizzard here.

We're going to reduce oracles gas requirement to help it in the late game...? Wait what? The requirements significantly affect the early game. "We don't want to see Oracles used just for harass early game" --> Don't REDUCE it's cost, INCREASE it's functionality.

Nascar-speed DTs, as if they didn't already dodge in and out of detection as is. This is just obviously a bad change. DTs aren't even a hard unit to use. In fact, it's pretty much the easiest in the game.

The upgrade change for mech would be -okay- but it's still a shitty way of balancing mech. It's the units and the composition itself that is so vulnerable, not just one upgrade. They are practically admitting that they are too lazy to properly balance the game with a change like this.

Tank attack speed and widow mine splash radius are both fine, but tanks should be even a little faster than that. 10% decrease won't make enough of a difference. The widowmines splash, on the other hand, was a good idea, though I imagine the only time people would use them is in the early game due to the insane single-target damage it does. 1.1 radius is just too small to be worth managing and investing in mid and late game.

Roach burrow speed? Ehh, boring change. The burrow mechanic isn't really that good anyway. It's only ever used in roach burrow all-ins that hope to catch the opponent off-guard which almost always makes the match total shit from then on.
lolfail9001
Profile Joined August 2013
Russian Federation40190 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-24 00:14:00
September 24 2013 00:08 GMT
#583
On September 24 2013 09:06 Mjolnir wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 24 2013 08:49 lolfail9001 wrote:
On September 24 2013 08:48 Mjolnir wrote:
Just buff siege tank damage.

Seriously - the freaking things are a joke.

Buff their damage and people will actually consider using them over mines - and they may be used in more than ONE (barely) match up.


Tbh tanks do not work for a whole bunch of other reasons, damage is kinda irrelevant here.


Such as?

(Before I get into it, I'd like to know what you're thinking. You didn't really leave a lot to work with.)


Such as mutas, forcing passive play from terran (and passive play from terran does not end well) and what not.
Also, IMO: I like the direction but numbers will obviously need some tweaks. Also, the real balance problem is competitive mindset: if you buff something that can be used in all-in, they will do this all-in more often, nothing else.
DeMoN pulls off a Miracle and Flies to the Moon
Mjolnir
Profile Joined January 2009
912 Posts
September 24 2013 00:13 GMT
#584
On September 24 2013 09:08 lolfail9001 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 24 2013 09:06 Mjolnir wrote:
On September 24 2013 08:49 lolfail9001 wrote:
On September 24 2013 08:48 Mjolnir wrote:
Just buff siege tank damage.

Seriously - the freaking things are a joke.

Buff their damage and people will actually consider using them over mines - and they may be used in more than ONE (barely) match up.


Tbh tanks do not work for a whole bunch of other reasons, damage is kinda irrelevant here.


Such as?

(Before I get into it, I'd like to know what you're thinking. You didn't really leave a lot to work with.)


Such as mutas, forcing passive play from terran (and passive play from terran does not end well) and what not.
Also, IMO: I like the direction but numbers will obviously need some tweaks.


Don't you think if there were better reward for using them that the counters wouldn't seem so harsh? Every unit should have a counter. My beef with tanks is they're countered so hard (as you suggest) that their own damage output isn't even worth it. Why make tanks when you can make more bio? If tanks actually had some damage behind their attacks, they'd provide incentive to risk making them (and protect them).

As for causing people to turtle more - that's up to the player; but I think more damage would provide greater offensive capabilities for them.

Sabu113
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States11047 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-24 00:35:55
September 24 2013 00:14 GMT
#585
On September 24 2013 08:14 PineapplePizza wrote:

As for the DT change, they should just merge the Dark Shrine with the Templar Archives. Right now, it's just this Cheese Tower that you construct to show your lack of shame and dignity, and dead-ends into defeat if your dt's don't kill 15 drones or whatnot. They've already made detection free and easy for everyone, so I don't see why this would be such a terrible idea >_>


Cheese tower is a term that should be used more liberally.

edit:

On September 24 2013 08:59 TeeTS wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 24 2013 08:56 hansonslee wrote:
It's sad how worked up the community is being with this patch. Blizzard is trying really hard to make Toss less deathball with more harassment options.

If anyone is killing eSports, it's the community who doesn't give these changes a chance.

Protoss has so many good harassment options. The problem is, that they can easily win (especially on low levels) without using them. It´s just way more comfortable to macro just up, defend a bit, and then roll over one big fight, than to be active over the whole game. You won´t get Protoss players get more active unless you pull them out of their comfort zone.
(this doesn´t apply to the very top level. We see those top protoss being very active with harassment)



Come for the comments stay for the insight. Never Change sc2 community.
Biomine is a drunken chick who is on industrial strength amphetamines and would just grab your dick and jerk it as hard and violently as she could while screaming 'OMG FUCK ME', because she saw it in a Sasha Grey video ...-Wombat_Ni
tili
Profile Joined July 2012
United States1332 Posts
September 24 2013 00:14 GMT
#586
Hahahaham wtf. The DTs are like mutas....
lolfail9001
Profile Joined August 2013
Russian Federation40190 Posts
September 24 2013 00:19 GMT
#587
On September 24 2013 09:13 Mjolnir wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 24 2013 09:08 lolfail9001 wrote:
On September 24 2013 09:06 Mjolnir wrote:
On September 24 2013 08:49 lolfail9001 wrote:
On September 24 2013 08:48 Mjolnir wrote:
Just buff siege tank damage.

Seriously - the freaking things are a joke.

Buff their damage and people will actually consider using them over mines - and they may be used in more than ONE (barely) match up.


Tbh tanks do not work for a whole bunch of other reasons, damage is kinda irrelevant here.


Such as?

(Before I get into it, I'd like to know what you're thinking. You didn't really leave a lot to work with.)


Such as mutas, forcing passive play from terran (and passive play from terran does not end well) and what not.
Also, IMO: I like the direction but numbers will obviously need some tweaks.


Don't you think if there were better reward for using them that the counters wouldn't seem so harsh? Every unit should have a counter. My beef with tanks is they're countered so hard (as you suggest) that their own damage output isn't even worth it. Why make tanks when you can make more bio? If tanks actually had some damage behind their attacks, they'd provide incentive to risk making them (and protect them).

As for causing people to turtle more - that's up to the player; but I think more damage would provide greater offensive capabilities for them.


I did not say they are countered so hard (in TvZ there are no real HARD counters to 'em on T2, but every T3 unit is one lol), i just mentioned that due to speedboost and widow mines it is easier to snipe tanks with mutas now.
About turtling: more damage will not prevent the fact that you have to turtle until at least few tanks before move out and even then you are likely to get cleaned up in a bad trade, should mutas snipe 'em.
DeMoN pulls off a Miracle and Flies to the Moon
-Kaiser-
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
Canada932 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-24 00:23:13
September 24 2013 00:21 GMT
#588
I think the radius nerf is a bit too much, but maybe the siege tank buff is a bit too little.

3.375 is way the fuck too fast for Dark Templar.
3 Hatch Before Cool
Necosarius
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
Sweden4042 Posts
September 24 2013 00:22 GMT
#589
In WoL Terran was the aggressive harassment oriented race and Protoss was the defensive base management race, now it seems like they want to flip things around. Only problem is that Terran still has to do damage in the mid game to prevent the protoss deathball.

JtoK
Profile Joined December 2011
Germany232 Posts
September 24 2013 00:23 GMT
#590
I think DT and Roach Speed buff are unnecessary. DTs as fast as Warp Prism with Speed upgrade, have same speed like Overseers with Speed upgrade and are real faster than ravens and observers with speed. I don't think its a good idea. DTs are often used and sometimes end the game early or do huge dmg. No need to buff them.
But I guess blizzard wants that the games stays imbalanced so the games are more exciting and entertaining.
They should change or buff the units that are underused like Carriers, BCs, maybe Ravens, Swarm Host, Infestor...
bokchoi
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Korea (South)9498 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-24 00:24:18
September 24 2013 00:23 GMT
#591
DT Speed buff? Wut?
Elldar
Profile Joined July 2010
Sweden287 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-24 00:25:33
September 24 2013 00:24 GMT
#592
On September 24 2013 08:56 hansonslee wrote:
It's sad how worked up the community is being with this patch. Blizzard is trying really hard to make Toss less deathball with more harassment options.

If anyone is killing eSports, it's the community who doesn't give these changes a chance.


So when you get a dt if it can't deal damage then you can just run away and turn into an archon which contribute to the deathball, or revelation that makes your deathball able to move accordingly to your opponents movement. Every single unit that is worth making for protoss will contribute to the deathball. The thing that makes the deathball so potent is that protoss got insant reiforcement and high output units like colossus and immortals, which also have long range considering their damage. However it is still fragile since the gateway units that is suppose to be the core set of units is too weak. Which arguably is due to warp gates.
Requiem-
Profile Joined October 2011
Uruguay162 Posts
September 24 2013 00:25 GMT
#593
On September 24 2013 08:57 lolfail9001 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 24 2013 08:53 Requiem- wrote:
melee widowmines gg

l2read, they changed splash radius, range of widowmine is still the same.

i meant the explosion, like a hit from any other unit xD
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Sup Son
BonitiilloO
Profile Joined June 2013
Dominican Republic614 Posts
September 24 2013 00:25 GMT
#594
Protoss getting some nice buff... dont know why many people dont like those buff... Protoss is becoming more interesting early game as they were in BW.

people keep calm this is just testing purpuses... dont need to be bashing new things on the game... anyways the game right now is so borring and stale that we need to test things and look how they work out...

How may help u?
JP Dayne
Profile Joined June 2013
538 Posts
September 24 2013 00:27 GMT
#595
at this stage of the game, any random change is more than welcome

watching sc2 has become a chore
Pursuit_
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
United States1330 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-24 00:33:18
September 24 2013 00:29 GMT
#596
On September 24 2013 09:08 lolfail9001 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 24 2013 09:06 Mjolnir wrote:
On September 24 2013 08:49 lolfail9001 wrote:
On September 24 2013 08:48 Mjolnir wrote:
Just buff siege tank damage.

Seriously - the freaking things are a joke.

Buff their damage and people will actually consider using them over mines - and they may be used in more than ONE (barely) match up.


Tbh tanks do not work for a whole bunch of other reasons, damage is kinda irrelevant here.


Such as?

(Before I get into it, I'd like to know what you're thinking. You didn't really leave a lot to work with.)


Such as mutas, forcing passive play from terran (and passive play from terran does not end well) and what not.
Also, IMO: I like the direction but numbers will obviously need some tweaks.


Zerglings (can pretty much shut down any sort of pre-maxed biotank push with just mass heavily upgraded lings), Swarm Hosts (Stalls pushes extremely efficiently, brings Mech pushes to a halt), Mutas (forces passive / defensive play, able to pick off stray tanks easily), Vipers (Blinding cloud + abduct), Ultras (Rapes marine/hellbat support, Tanks require so much gas maurader transition is harder), Immortals (Really good at tanking siege tank shots while shields are up and dishes out crazy damage, 3-4 shots tanks), Chargelots (Tanky unit recieves reduced damage and covers the gap quickly), Archons (Tanky unit that recieves reduced damage), Pheonix (Lift is rediculously strong vs tanks, effectively takes them out of the fight), VR / Tempest / Carrier (all powerful air units that Mech can't deal with cost or supply efficiently).

Not to mention Tanks are units that scale well with numbers, 1-3 tanks are a joke for Protoss or Zerg but ~8 start to get pretty scary. They also cut into gas a lot (Unit + Factories + Upgrades), taking away from upgrades and delaying any sort of push. If you want to commit to tanks, almost all of your gas has to go into them.
In Somnis Veritas
Dark.Carnival
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
United States5095 Posts
September 24 2013 00:29 GMT
#597
DT speed buff o_o I can hear the terran in Artosis screaming off in the distance...
@QxGDarkCell ._.
Dr.Sin
Profile Joined October 2010
Canada1126 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-24 00:33:08
September 24 2013 00:30 GMT
#598
I think these are all interesting changes.

(Possibly already said) I propose a change where the widow mine burrow speed up also increases the tank siege mode switch, possibly even faster than the currently proposed speed. You could make mech more dynamic in the late game without compromising the early game as it is.

Similarly I like Plansix' idea of adding DT speed with zealot charge.
Cloak
Profile Joined October 2009
United States816 Posts
September 24 2013 00:31 GMT
#599
Mech ground and air attack upgrades combined

We've been looking at this for a long time now, and it feels like a solid step in the right direction.


This change will most likely affect air transitions rather than mech transitions. MMMVG will have 3/3 Vikings eventually but I'm just not seeing opportunities where Bio -> Mech is encouraged. The Mech standalone approach will be relatively unaffected, mostly because it doesn't affect the virtues of Mech; still have to pay the same for the same upgrades. Just makes it easier to incorporate air later on.

Mech's infrastructure is too demanding to have it be a parallel timeline to Bio and the units are not conducive to dynamic play at the moment. These are not absolute, but my suggestions would be build time reduction of Siege and Thor and/or gas reduction cost of Factory, which would lessen infrastructural constraints. We also need to take a real look at Siege and Thor with how ranged AoE GtG and GtA should be reconciled in the SC2 environment. Are we happy with the current Siege ball and one click? Retain smart fire for Siege? Are we happy with the slow a-move of Thor? Adjust supply scale of Thor? Was the Thor supposed be the Warhound?

Widow mine splash radius decreased from 1.75 to 1.1

We'd like to push out the Widow Mine a little bit and bump up the Siege Tank so that bio play becomes more interesting. Ultimately, we believe a mix of Widow Mines and Siege Tanks with your bio army will be a lot more fun to watch than just Widow Mines with bio alone.


Widow Mine is supposed to be that transition into Mech, but it overlaps too well with Tank or Thor, since it's basically just a medium range AoE GtG and GtA. Its role needs to be fleshed out more, perhaps making it a more reliable and speedier fighter to really ease the loss of Bio squads. Perhaps Medivacs can regenerate cooldown. Perhaps Medivacs should just repair Mech too. A drastic AoE nerf is harsh with the current unit stats, but it will start to reshape its function by narrowing the AoE. Perhaps WMs should have a baby EMP effect, since the +shields modifier is basically just that, and Vipers are still a Mech issue.

Siege tank attack period decreased from 3 to 2.7

Bio play may be more interesting with the Widow Mine change and this buff. Not only that, we believe Terran mech armies can be a lot more viable because faster attack speed naturally means Siege Tanks will be better against their hard counters.


This is an interesting change because it does indirectly nerf Immortal shields, rather than adding on damage that would be negated. It does relatively nothing against Vipers, so that's why I mentioned the WM idea. They will be "better" in general, so perhaps that's enough of a excuse to bring back Bio/Tank for TvZ. Eventually if you make Siege good enough, they will be used in TvP. Is it enough? Can't tell yet.

Oracle cost decreased from 150/150 to 150/100

Protoss feels like it has been playing too defensively (outside of Warp Prism harasses). We’re seeing Oracles only being used in the early game, and not much during any other stage of the game. We hope by reducing the gas cost of the Oracle, they’ll be used more throughout the game.


Reducing the cost seems like a change with good intent, but the quality of life won't change much, and it will still be relegated to 1 Oracle that sticks around if it lives. We already have the MsC as that sort of thing. Like a broken record, Oracle should take a page from Banshee and get just enough range to skirt around air defense, and a reduction in worker kills per second with less energy cost. Downtime due to energy seems to be a spectator failure. Boxer's Immortal Marines would be such blue balls if they just ran out of bullets. Revelation is still a dumb spell that promotes passive play until the debuff runs out, and Envision is still not enough to justify the cost.

Dark Templar movement speed increased from 2.813 to 3.375

We believe that Dark Templars could be more interesting to watch if it's not just a matter of the opponent being prepared or not. Even when their opponents are prepared, we believe by increasing Dark Templar’s movement speed, there could be more interesting interactions, such as dodging out of detection range more often


A lot of people say this just buffs gimmick, but it actually reduces gimmick by making it less one dimensional on detection or no detection. It'll be more annoying for the defender, but there's already plenty of other more annoying shit to deal with in this game. Warp Prism and DT can share the niche of skirmish hit and runs in their own way. DTs aren't prevalent enough to warrant such caution with their changes. I still like the Blink idea, that only comes about if you bother to research it. Blink Stalkers and DTs still are both mutually gas hungry enough where it shouldn't be that big of an issue. Also Blink Stalker/DT in PvZ was an interesting composition that no longer exists.

Roach speed upgrade also increases the burrowed roach movement speed from 1.41 to 2.25

We just don’t see Tunneling Claws coming into play much. There’s some really cool micro potential with burrow-moving Roaches, and we'd like to see how this goes in a test map.


I'm still on the fence about Roach Burrow micro. I've just never felt it that entertaining, but I am biased, so maybe people can chime in if they get a rush when all the Roaches just burrow 1/3rd into a battle and the enemy just camps just to restart the battle with 0 micro hit exchanges. I think Nydus would be a cooler focus.
The more you know, the less you understand.
xyzz
Profile Joined January 2012
567 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-09-24 00:34:16
September 24 2013 00:32 GMT
#600
On September 24 2013 08:57 IshinShishi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 24 2013 08:56 hansonslee wrote:
It's sad how worked up the community is being with this patch. Blizzard is trying really hard to make Toss less deathball with more harassment options.

If anyone is killing eSports, it's the community who doesn't give these changes a chance.

the problem is that they can still go for the deathball just fine, this changes nothing, just allows for more gimmicky stuff which we already see so much.

Too bad for Protoss players then that their deathballs are winning nothing on the premier tournament scene these days. Neither is their cheese plays by the way. Something has to be buffed for Protoss to actually manage to win one more premier tournament before Legacy of the Void hits, but the polls reflect the lower tier players' problems in dealing with +a moving Protosses quite well. Everyone is against Protoss buffs, no matter how slight and necessary they may be.

The dumbest thing of course is that the so called community doesn't even know what kind of statistical and diagnostical balance tools Kim & his team at Blizzard have at their disposal because the forum posters aren't games designers. The community instead blindly follows rumours and gossip and takes the nonsense of forum loudmouths with personal agendas as gospel.
Prev 1 28 29 30 31 32 68 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 9h 49m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 43
ProTech0
StarCraft: Brood War
Hyuk 1031
NaDa 75
Aegong 42
Dota 2
monkeys_forever276
LuMiX0
League of Legends
syndereN456
Counter-Strike
Fnx 1391
flusha338
Coldzera 295
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox296
AZ_Axe109
Other Games
tarik_tv7765
Grubby2222
Day[9].tv1181
shahzam570
C9.Mang0281
ViBE184
Maynarde153
Livibee88
Liquid`Ken7
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1276
BasetradeTV27
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• RyuSc2 64
• rockletztv 6
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22343
League of Legends
• Doublelift4664
Other Games
• Scarra1647
• Day9tv1181
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
9h 49m
ByuN vs Zoun
SHIN vs TriGGeR
Cyan vs ShoWTimE
Rogue vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs Solar
Reynor vs Maru
herO vs Cure
Serral vs Classic
Esports World Cup
1d 9h
Esports World Cup
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Online Event
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.