EPTBlizzcon qualification probabilities simulation - Page 26
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
| ||
|
painkilla
United States695 Posts
On October 08 2013 09:30 Dodgin wrote: So now revival has the possibility to pass Mvp in the rankings thanks to his charity spot at IEM NYC =/ so dumb Only if he win the tournament, which has a non-zero probability indeed. | ||
Shellshock
United States97274 Posts
| ||
|
Die4Ever
United States17588 Posts
On October 08 2013 09:39 Shellshock wrote: I'm also curious what Maru's 1/300000 chance of not qualifying is ^^ Haha, I'll post it after the GSL placement matches when I do the update. I also think I'll have it prioritize showing IEM related events for the game changers, as a special IEM edition update. But for now I must take a nap before GSL. | ||
|
NoGasfOu
United States1117 Posts
On October 08 2013 09:30 Dodgin wrote: So now revival has the possibility to pass Mvp in the rankings thanks to his charity spot at IEM NYC =/ so dumb Guess who's the player that got 6 GSL bailout seeds! | ||
|
Dragoonstorm7
United States599 Posts
On October 08 2013 09:30 Dodgin wrote: So now revival has the possibility to pass Mvp in the rankings thanks to his charity spot at IEM NYC =/ so dumb Revival is the reigning champ, he deserved one of the wildcard slots more than TLO or Flash hands down. This is IEMs way of trying to patch-up their grievous mistake of not giving Revival an auto-qual initially. | ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
On October 08 2013 09:53 Dragoonstorm7 wrote: Revival is the reigning champ, he deserved one of the wildcard slots more than TLO or Flash hands down. This is IEMs way of trying to patch-up their grievous mistake of not giving Revival an auto-qual initially. I agree he deserves it more than Flash but he took a EU qualifier spot, doesn't make any sense. | ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
On October 08 2013 09:43 NoGasfOu wrote: Guess who's the player that got 6 GSL bailout seeds! six? Huk? | ||
|
Dragoonstorm7
United States599 Posts
On October 08 2013 10:03 Dodgin wrote: I agree he deserves it more than Flash but he took a EU qualifier spot, doesn't make any sense. Yeah I agree it doesnt make much sense =/ , maybe IEM is saying EU got TLO? That would be dumb too... Idk, I just think that even tho its pretty dumb, Revival DID deserve the spot. | ||
|
Dragoonstorm7
United States599 Posts
Clearly deserved due to that "top 3 control"  | ||
|
Die4Ever
United States17588 Posts
| ||
|
NoGasfOu
United States1117 Posts
It's Naniwa | ||
Darkhorse
United States23455 Posts
On October 08 2013 10:03 Dodgin wrote: I agree he deserves it more than Flash but he took a EU qualifier spot, doesn't make any sense. It does seem a little random of them to just jump to Revival instead of asking Nerchio but it is slightly justifiable. Still feel that it probably should've been offered to EU. | ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
No way, he got 6 seeds? I feel like it was more like 4. 3 code A and 1 Code S? | ||
|
painkilla
United States695 Posts
On October 08 2013 10:07 Dragoonstorm7 wrote: Yeah I agree it doesnt make much sense =/ , maybe IEM is saying EU got TLO? That would be dumb too... Idk, I just think that even tho its pretty dumb, Revival DID deserve the spot. No he didn't. The IEM regionals are independent and winning one doesn't mean you get invite to another. Inviting based on WCS points is stupid in the first place (let's give the ones with the most WCS points a chance to get even more WCS points) and it's not what happened here. I think either IEM was looking to invite someone that for sure will accept (in this case Revival due to his WCS ranking) or something even shadier is going on. | ||
|
NoGasfOu
United States1117 Posts
On October 08 2013 10:48 Dodgin wrote: No way, he got 6 seeds? I feel like it was more like 4. 3 code A and 1 Code S? First 3 are code A in which he dropped out 0-2 every time, twice to Lucky. A couple of up-and-down, and then code S. | ||
|
painkilla
United States695 Posts
On October 08 2013 10:58 NoGasfOu wrote: First 3 are code A in which he dropped out 0-2 every time, twice to Lucky. A couple of up-and-down, and then code S. OK. Where are you going with this? Naniwa deserves getting screw over because of his 6 GSL seeds? | ||
|
NoGasfOu
United States1117 Posts
On October 08 2013 11:01 painkilla wrote: OK. Where are you going with this? Naniwa deserves getting screw over because of his 6 GSL seeds? Nobody is screwing him over. If he has the skill he will go through considering the number of tournaments outside of wcs he's sent to in order to get extra points. People are talking about Revival's 'charity spot' being dump. Well, talk about charity spots. | ||
|
painkilla
United States695 Posts
On October 08 2013 11:11 NoGasfOu wrote: Nobody is screwing him over. If he has the skill he will go through considering the number of tournaments outside of wcs he's sent to in order to get extra points. People are talking about Revival's 'charity spot' being dump. Well, talk about charity spots. You make $0-1000 if given a seed to GSL. You make $10k just by playing in Blizzcon. Blizzcon is the only one, biggest tournament of the year. There were 9 GSLs in 2011. If GSL are giving out seeds to foreigners, they pretty much have to go with Naniwa and may be one or two others IEM has 20 other choices beside Revival, the most controlversial one. The two situations aren't comparable in anyway. Also, Naniwa was seeded in GSL for doing well in foreign tournaments, so not all of them were charity. | ||
|
movac
Canada494 Posts
If revival doesn't win iem ny he won't pass mvp either. Season finals is likely to dominated by all those players who are already above mvp in ranking, so 97 percent looks about right to me. Also about the seeding, iem didn't consider the possibility that grubby/nerchio might be willing pay for their own plane tickets | ||
| ||
