EPTplus their english production is kinda meh atm
ESF teams/players missing from MLG vs Proleague - Page 29
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
plus their english production is kinda meh atm | ||
|
LuckoftheIrish
United States4791 Posts
On September 28 2012 07:56 opterown wrote: for $10 you will only get 19-32 games, not that great a deal imo especially compared with gsl plus their english production is kinda meh atm You know every player is playing every other player, right? There are six matches today with six more match days to follow. That's.... that's not 19-32 games, is that that is. Plus there are playoffs, which is eight additional match days. | ||
|
skyflyfish
Canada499 Posts
| ||
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On September 28 2012 08:17 LuckoftheIrish wrote: You know every player is playing every other player, right? There are six matches today with six more match days to follow. That's.... that's not 19-32 games, is that that is. Plus there are playoffs, which is eight additional match days. was talking about the OSL, oops | ||
|
heaveshade
China330 Posts
can they just write news depend on real material and investment, bad job to make that kind of news even if they are true | ||
|
brokenLoL
United Kingdom419 Posts
| ||
|
Pudge_172
United States1378 Posts
| ||
|
neoghaleon55
United States7435 Posts
On September 29 2012 02:48 Pudge_172 wrote: Just saw how the bracket is... Kespa player guaranteed a spot in the finals.... no way I'm paying for this.... rigged? It's just good business  | ||
|
jinorazi
Korea (South)4948 Posts
On September 29 2012 02:48 Pudge_172 wrote: Just saw how the bracket is... Kespa player guaranteed a spot in the finals.... no way I'm paying for this.... so does mlg side, 1 mlg finalist vs 1 proleague finalist. wtf is wrong with people lol | ||
|
RifleCow
Canada637 Posts
On September 29 2012 04:00 jinorazi wrote: so does mlg side, 1 mlg finalist vs 1 proleague finalist. wtf is wrong with people lol People don't like the automatic seed into the MLG procircuit without any qualification process. | ||
|
ragz_gt
9172 Posts
On September 28 2012 13:44 brokenLoL wrote: Wow great job by ESF players. They were basically MLG's best friend, then MLG found kespa and just sold out and think they are too cool for ESF. I guess this just proves that nice guys finish last. Well too be fair MLG and GOM was not in the best relationship since Naniwa thing, and certainly after GSTL final @ IPL4. | ||
|
StarStruck
25339 Posts
On September 29 2012 04:03 RifleCow wrote: People don't like the automatic seed into the MLG procircuit without any qualification process. Technically they did the qualification process through the actual format. so perhaps we should edit your post and remove the automatic seed with format with regards to your distaste for the process. | ||
|
RifleCow
Canada637 Posts
On September 29 2012 04:19 StarStruck wrote: Technically they did the qualification process through the actual format. so perhaps we should edit your post and remove the automatic seed with format with regards to your distaste for the process. I personally have no opinion either way. But I certainly see peoples criticisms of the fact that an invite tournament provides seeding into the MLG pro circuit. Especially since the invitees haven't even played at a proper MLG tournament prior to this invite tournament. | ||
|
jinorazi
Korea (South)4948 Posts
On September 29 2012 04:34 RifleCow wrote: I personally have no opinion either way. But I certainly see peoples criticisms of the fact that an invite tournament provides seeding into the MLG pro circuit. Especially since the invitees haven't even played at a proper MLG tournament prior to this invite tournament. mlg players have mlg experience, that was the point for their invite afaik. proleague players have their proleague experience and this tournament is merging of the two. why are people splitting hairs about this? as if these proleague players are no name scrubs. | ||
|
StarStruck
25339 Posts
MLG made the qualification part of this tournament. To say they have no qualification process is folly because it's part of the format. Once again, we're talking about misplaced criticism. | ||
|
ragz_gt
9172 Posts
On September 29 2012 04:42 jinorazi wrote: mlg players have mlg experience, that was the point for their invite afaik. proleague players have their proleague experience and this tournament is merging of the two. why are people splitting hairs about this? as if these proleague players are no name scrubs. I have more problem with # of seeding given out than anything else. It is a cross server glorified online show match involving 48 players, no matter how qualified they are. And I think most people agree it is not a bracket well suited for determining player's skill level. MLG is giving out 8 spots to group play from it somehow, which is 1/4 of total group spots if same format as previous championship. 2 I can totally agree to, 8 just seems a lot more like a publicity stunt than anything else. | ||
|
RifleCow
Canada637 Posts
On September 29 2012 04:42 jinorazi wrote: mlg players have mlg experience, that was the point for their invite afaik. proleague players have their proleague experience and this tournament is merging of the two. why are people splitting hairs about this? as if these proleague players are no name scrubs. Depends on how much significance you place on the competition from the hybrid proleague. Splitting hairs over 2 or 4 or watever seeds doesn't really matter to me; MLG can do what they want. ESF players can also feel like it isn't worth to them in terms of time and money and whatnot. The amount of interest will be shown in the viewer numbers. EDIT: I personally am not going to watch this tournament because I don't think a cross-server tournament will show good games. The only reason I purchased the MLG arenas is due to the FPV of the players, since that isn't available, I don't think the tourny is worth the price point. | ||
|
LuckoftheIrish
United States4791 Posts
On September 29 2012 04:48 RifleCow wrote: Depends on how much significance you place on the competition from the hybrid proleague. Splitting hairs over 2 or 4 or watever seeds doesn't really matter to me; MLG can do what they want. ESF players can also feel like it isn't worth to them in terms of time and money and whatnot. The amount of interest will be shown in the viewer numbers. EDIT: I personally am not going to watch this tournament because I don't think a cross-server tournament will show good games. The only reason I purchased the MLG arenas is due to the FPV of the players, since that isn't available, I don't think the tourny is worth the price point. For your last point, Lee said on Lo3 that that would be available at some point, I think. I don't remember exactly, but he definitely brought up watching a match from Jaedong's perspective. | ||
|
Cattlecruiser
United States340 Posts
On September 29 2012 04:34 RifleCow wrote: I personally have no opinion either way. But I certainly see peoples criticisms of the fact that an invite tournament provides seeding into the MLG pro circuit. Especially since the invitees haven't even played at a proper MLG tournament prior to this invite tournament. I'm sure these KeSPA players won't be able to make it out of the open brackets if they didn't get automatic seeds. Since open brackets @ MLGs are so packed full of talented players and MLG players are dominating this tournament. lmao The reason for the free seeds is to attract KeSPA players to MLG events. Why would Flash want to waste time preparing for the GSL or OSL to compete against minor league competition? He could probably find better competition at a random PC room. | ||
| ||
