|
On August 27 2012 04:25 Yorbon wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2012 04:21 achan1058 wrote:On August 27 2012 04:09 Yorbon wrote:On August 27 2012 04:06 Medrea wrote: Yeah time is ticking. Also Blizzard has yet to respond to all this.
I think ESF should back out of every OSL tournament for every tournament Kespa backs out of.
I think blizzard will try to solve behind closed doors, kespa will participate in gsl 4 and esf will participate in osl. Or everything blows up and we get a gom/kespa (non-game) rivalry, which no one wants.. ): Blizzard still has the banning tournament trump card, and I doubt neither side would want to run a pirate server. However, Blizzard would be reluctant to use this, for obvious reasons. Because of this, i am slightly optimistic. On the other hand, as you say, blizzard doesn't want any of the parties to quit sc2. So they are in quite the dilemma. If Blizz does ban KeSPA, I would laugh for a week like FXOBoSS.
|
On August 27 2012 04:28 achan1058 wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2012 04:25 Yorbon wrote:On August 27 2012 04:21 achan1058 wrote:On August 27 2012 04:09 Yorbon wrote:On August 27 2012 04:06 Medrea wrote: Yeah time is ticking. Also Blizzard has yet to respond to all this.
I think ESF should back out of every OSL tournament for every tournament Kespa backs out of.
I think blizzard will try to solve behind closed doors, kespa will participate in gsl 4 and esf will participate in osl. Or everything blows up and we get a gom/kespa (non-game) rivalry, which no one wants.. ): Blizzard still has the banning tournament trump card, and I doubt neither side would want to run a pirate server. However, Blizzard would be reluctant to use this, for obvious reasons. Because of this, i am slightly optimistic. On the other hand, as you say, blizzard doesn't want any of the parties to quit sc2. So they are in quite the dilemma. If Blizz does ban KeSPA, I would laugh for a week like FXOBoSS. If they do ban KeSPA, Blizzard will also screwed for future sales(Heart of the swarm) in Korea. OnGameNet will also most likely drop SC2 completely and focus only on League of Legends which is not what Blizzard wants. Viewer count for OGN on TV is far far greater GSL even with international viewers.
|
On August 27 2012 04:33 BgSBendeR wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2012 04:28 achan1058 wrote:On August 27 2012 04:25 Yorbon wrote:On August 27 2012 04:21 achan1058 wrote:On August 27 2012 04:09 Yorbon wrote:On August 27 2012 04:06 Medrea wrote: Yeah time is ticking. Also Blizzard has yet to respond to all this.
I think ESF should back out of every OSL tournament for every tournament Kespa backs out of.
I think blizzard will try to solve behind closed doors, kespa will participate in gsl 4 and esf will participate in osl. Or everything blows up and we get a gom/kespa (non-game) rivalry, which no one wants.. ): Blizzard still has the banning tournament trump card, and I doubt neither side would want to run a pirate server. However, Blizzard would be reluctant to use this, for obvious reasons. Because of this, i am slightly optimistic. On the other hand, as you say, blizzard doesn't want any of the parties to quit sc2. So they are in quite the dilemma. If Blizz does ban KeSPA, I would laugh for a week like FXOBoSS. If they do ban KeSPA, Blizzard will also screwed for future sales(Heart of the swarm) in Korea. OnGameNet will also most likely drop SC2 completely and focus only on League of Legends which is not what Blizzard wants. Viewer count for OGN on TV is far far greater GSL even with international viewers. Of course Blizz is not stupid enough to do that, unless KeSPA is equally stupid. But still, I would laugh for a week since not only OGN is screwed, but the issue with ESF is still there even with LoL.
|
On August 27 2012 04:23 Sandermatt wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2012 04:20 LuckoftheIrish wrote:On August 27 2012 04:18 Sikly wrote:On August 27 2012 04:10 elagrion wrote:On August 27 2012 04:00 Myrddraal wrote:On August 27 2012 03:52 BgSBendeR wrote:On August 27 2012 03:49 Havik_ wrote: This makes sense. Why in the blue hell should the ESF guys play in the OSL if the Kespa guys wont play in the GSL? Its unfortunate for the scene I feel like, but its business. Just that. It's strictly business. and GOMTV is being greedy about it. KeSPA agreed to play in the WCS which was all broadcasted by GOM only.. KeSPA didn't really gain anything from it expect proving that their players are indeed catching up fast. Now GOM wants even more. Greedy fucks... GOM is just trying for even terms, even participation from both sides, you must be extremely biased to not see that it is going both ways, KeSPA is the one withholding from GOM, not the other way around. If KeSPA just agrees to let it's players participate in GSL then there will be no problems, none. Also I really think you should improve your posting quality, calling GOM greedy fucks is just not necessary. You don't see other thing - Proleague is still going on and will end at september. Proleague means Broodwar. So, while yes, there is business interests and geed from both side, you can't ignore fact that Kespa players still practising at broodwar. So, it's logical for Kespa (being players association) to protect players and Proleague. I'm going to be honest; I'd be shocked if they put ANY practice into BW at this point. There is almost 0 reason to, after this monster that is proleague ends it will only be SC2. Judging by the quality of proleague(what I've watched) they have pretty much transitioned purely into sc2 at this point. Did you see the matches last night? Cheese-tastic. At one point Sayle had a casting ragequit during Light/Stats and went AFK while looping Gangnam Style. Do you know where I can find a record of this ragequit? Sounds funny.
Don't know how to link twitch to a specific time, it's around 1:14h in http://www.twitch.tv/saylesc/b/329973453
After the OSL Finals I think it's pretty obvious nobody is actively practicing BW anymore, Fantasy thanked his teammates for practicing with him even though nobody practiced BW anymore and the matches speak for themselves. Cheese and rookie mistakes from even the best players.
|
On August 27 2012 04:38 Shurayuki wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2012 04:23 Sandermatt wrote:On August 27 2012 04:20 LuckoftheIrish wrote:On August 27 2012 04:18 Sikly wrote:On August 27 2012 04:10 elagrion wrote:On August 27 2012 04:00 Myrddraal wrote:On August 27 2012 03:52 BgSBendeR wrote:On August 27 2012 03:49 Havik_ wrote: This makes sense. Why in the blue hell should the ESF guys play in the OSL if the Kespa guys wont play in the GSL? Its unfortunate for the scene I feel like, but its business. Just that. It's strictly business. and GOMTV is being greedy about it. KeSPA agreed to play in the WCS which was all broadcasted by GOM only.. KeSPA didn't really gain anything from it expect proving that their players are indeed catching up fast. Now GOM wants even more. Greedy fucks... GOM is just trying for even terms, even participation from both sides, you must be extremely biased to not see that it is going both ways, KeSPA is the one withholding from GOM, not the other way around. If KeSPA just agrees to let it's players participate in GSL then there will be no problems, none. Also I really think you should improve your posting quality, calling GOM greedy fucks is just not necessary. You don't see other thing - Proleague is still going on and will end at september. Proleague means Broodwar. So, while yes, there is business interests and geed from both side, you can't ignore fact that Kespa players still practising at broodwar. So, it's logical for Kespa (being players association) to protect players and Proleague. I'm going to be honest; I'd be shocked if they put ANY practice into BW at this point. There is almost 0 reason to, after this monster that is proleague ends it will only be SC2. Judging by the quality of proleague(what I've watched) they have pretty much transitioned purely into sc2 at this point. Did you see the matches last night? Cheese-tastic. At one point Sayle had a casting ragequit during Light/Stats and went AFK while looping Gangnam Style. Do you know where I can find a record of this ragequit? Sounds funny. Don't know how to link twitch to a specific time, it's around 1:14h in http://www.twitch.tv/saylesc/b/329973453After the OSL Finals I think it's pretty obvious nobody is actively practicing BW anymore, Fantasy thanked his teammates for practicing with him even though nobody practiced BW anymore and the matches speak for themselves. Cheese and rookie mistakes from even the best players.
1:15 in almost exactly. "Awww, whatever." GANGNAM STYLE
|
On August 27 2012 03:08 6NR wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2012 02:53 naastyOne wrote: I sencesense some KeSPA employes employees in the trend thread. there... :p
![[image loading]](http://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/masonry/000/035/047/grammar-nazi.jpg)
User was temp banned for this post.
|
On August 27 2012 03:47 bo1b wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2012 03:44 CoR wrote:On August 27 2012 03:07 Myrddraal wrote:On August 27 2012 02:33 Sethronu wrote: As for KeSPA 'killing off Gom' stuff... again, KeSPA is NOT a broadcaster, they do NOT gain revenue from OSL streams or what have you. It doesn't matter much to KeSPA whether their teams' play is broadcasted by OGN or GomTV; they might prefer OGN as their primary broadcaster because they have a longer and, in the most recent days, more peaceful relationship with them, but considering that they already have the interest of OGN's viewers, while GSL fanbase is basically untapped potential for them, it makes no sense trying to stifle GomTV just for the sake of it at this point.
KeSPA may not gain revenue directly from broadcasting, but popularity of OSL definitely benefits their teams and players. Like I said, the decision to stay out of GSL might not be to intentionally hurt Gom, but that's what it will do. from fxo boss statement: 1) OGN and KESPA are pretty much the same thing. Their interests are extremely common and 1 company is the common party. so kespa does this to make ogn only woth league and gom die with no other reason The one problem I have with that is that both leagues stand to profit if the other exists. So long as the times aren't overlapping in schedule then there is very little reason to watch one over the other when both has the same pool of players available. Thank you for clarifying and agreeing with the pro-ESF camp. Here's the score: KeSPA and GOM made an informal agreement to allow players from both leagues to compete (They allowed cross competition after the announcement of the esports vision agreement between GOM, KeSPA, Blizzard, and OGN).
GOM invited KeSPA to send players for GSL 3. KeSPA said they were not ready. This was fine. They each have their own separate pool of players. KeSPA sends players to WCS, with very good results. This was also fine. Both sides get to play in a Blizzard event. It is a mutually beneficial relationship.
Players from the ESF qualify for auction OS2L (because they wanted to). This sounds like the beginning of an awesome rivalry: Who is going to prevail, the old BW stars or the current SC2 champions!?? Will the ESF players (and Oz and MC) be able to take home an OSL victory or will they be smashed by elephants?!? Will the KeSPA players be able to qualify and even take home the GSL4 trophy?!?!
And then KeSPA says "Hey guys we're not going to ALLOW our players to play in GSL 4 because of scheduling issues. I know you were hoping for this mutually beneficial agreement where we could show our players off to your international fans, and players from your tournament could get some face time on OGN, but no, we'll just BAN our players from playing in your tournament. All of them. Thanks for letting us use your players though, we're just glad they didn't have any scheduling issues since you're dumb enough to let them choose which tournaments they play in."
So. KeSPA has the promise of a new audience, and GOM gets jack shit in return. This is where the problem is. This is not a mutually beneficial relationship. KeSPA gets what they want, and GOM gets nothing in return. KeSPA fired the first shot by banning their players from competing in GSL. ESF sees this as a repeat of history, and fires back (with the support of the non-ESF players MC and Oz.)
|
So this OSL is done, right? What about those GSL players who want to attend OSL, I bet there are some. Do they get the "freedom" to do so? They already put lots of effort in qualification rounds. That's a giant mid finger to them also from ESF.
|
On August 27 2012 04:54 ElephantBaby wrote: So this OSL is done, right? What about those GSL players who want to attend OSL, I bet there are some. Do they get the "freedom" to do so? The players have been consulted when they made this decision. Check who made the announcement. It's Nestea, a player on ESF.
|
On August 27 2012 04:54 ElephantBaby wrote: So this OSL is done, right? What about those GSL players who want to attend OSL, I bet there are some. Do they get the "freedom" to do so?
Yes they do have this freedom. It actually is the players who rejected, not GOM: eSF is a player union. MC's team is not even part of the eSF and MC just sides with the eSF and doesn't attend the OSL either. The OSL is not done yet, only if KEspa keeps up their GSL4 ban.
|
On August 27 2012 04:54 achan1058 wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2012 04:54 ElephantBaby wrote: So this OSL is done, right? What about those GSL players who want to attend OSL, I bet there are some. Do they get the "freedom" to do so? The players have been consulted when they made this decision.
I bet KeSPA also "consulted", whatever that means.
|
On August 27 2012 04:55 ElephantBaby wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2012 04:54 achan1058 wrote:On August 27 2012 04:54 ElephantBaby wrote: So this OSL is done, right? What about those GSL players who want to attend OSL, I bet there are some. Do they get the "freedom" to do so? The players have been consulted when they made this decision. I bet KeSPA also "consulted", whatever that means.
I don't think you understand the difference between the two organizations.
|
On August 27 2012 04:47 Jormundr wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2012 03:47 bo1b wrote:On August 27 2012 03:44 CoR wrote:On August 27 2012 03:07 Myrddraal wrote:On August 27 2012 02:33 Sethronu wrote: As for KeSPA 'killing off Gom' stuff... again, KeSPA is NOT a broadcaster, they do NOT gain revenue from OSL streams or what have you. It doesn't matter much to KeSPA whether their teams' play is broadcasted by OGN or GomTV; they might prefer OGN as their primary broadcaster because they have a longer and, in the most recent days, more peaceful relationship with them, but considering that they already have the interest of OGN's viewers, while GSL fanbase is basically untapped potential for them, it makes no sense trying to stifle GomTV just for the sake of it at this point.
KeSPA may not gain revenue directly from broadcasting, but popularity of OSL definitely benefits their teams and players. Like I said, the decision to stay out of GSL might not be to intentionally hurt Gom, but that's what it will do. from fxo boss statement: 1) OGN and KESPA are pretty much the same thing. Their interests are extremely common and 1 company is the common party. so kespa does this to make ogn only woth league and gom die with no other reason The one problem I have with that is that both leagues stand to profit if the other exists. So long as the times aren't overlapping in schedule then there is very little reason to watch one over the other when both has the same pool of players available. Thank you for clarifying and agreeing with the pro-ESF camp. Here's the score: KeSPA and GOM made an informal agreement to allow players from both leagues to compete (They allowed cross competition after the announcement of the esports vision agreement between GOM, KeSPA, Blizzard, and OGN). GOM invited KeSPA to send players for GSL 3. KeSPA said they were not ready. This was fine. They each have their own separate pool of players. KeSPA sends players to WCS, with very good results. This was also fine. Both sides get to play in a Blizzard event. It is a mutually beneficial relationship. Players from the ESF qualify for auction OS2L (because they wanted to). This sounds like the beginning of an awesome rivalry: Who is going to prevail, the old BW stars or the current SC2 champions!?? Will the ESF players (and Oz and MC) be able to take home an OSL victory or will they be smashed by elephants?!? Will the KeSPA players be able to qualify and even take home the GSL4 trophy?!?! And then KeSPA says "Hey guys we're not going to ALLOW our players to play in GSL 4 because of scheduling issues. I know you were hoping for this mutually beneficial agreement where we could show our players off to your international fans, and players from your tournament could get some face time on OGN, but no, we'll just BAN our players from playing in your tournament. All of them. Thanks for letting us use your players though, we're just glad they didn't have any scheduling issues since you're dumb enough to let them choose which tournaments they play in." So. KeSPA has the promise of a new audience, and GOM gets jack shit in return. This is where the problem is. This is not a mutually beneficial relationship. KeSPA gets what they want, and GOM gets nothing in return. KeSPA fired the first shot by banning their players from competing in GSL. ESF sees this as a repeat of history, and fires back (with the support of the non-ESF players MC and Oz.) Hm, i can't remember reading about mc and oz as players agreeing. Do you have a source? Or did i just not read properly?
|
On August 27 2012 04:55 ElephantBaby wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2012 04:54 achan1058 wrote:On August 27 2012 04:54 ElephantBaby wrote: So this OSL is done, right? What about those GSL players who want to attend OSL, I bet there are some. Do they get the "freedom" to do so? The players have been consulted when they made this decision. I bet KeSPA also "consulted", whatever that means.
KeSPA is the sponsors, eSF it the players. KeSPA can take licenses away. eSF has no power over it's members.
|
On August 27 2012 04:55 ElephantBaby wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2012 04:54 achan1058 wrote:On August 27 2012 04:54 ElephantBaby wrote: So this OSL is done, right? What about those GSL players who want to attend OSL, I bet there are some. Do they get the "freedom" to do so? The players have been consulted when they made this decision. I bet KeSPA also "consulted", whatever that means. Except neither GOM nor ESF can hold players/teams like KeSPA does. Otherwise, ESF v0.1 would not have fallen apart. All I got to say is: Thanks, KeSPA. You mean the dream of a real players union a reality. Such a union would not have existed without you.
|
You're either really naive or really stupid if you think any given players could decide to go against eSF / GomTV deciding something like that move. :\
|
On August 27 2012 04:57 LuckoftheIrish wrote:Show nested quote +On August 27 2012 04:55 ElephantBaby wrote:On August 27 2012 04:54 achan1058 wrote:On August 27 2012 04:54 ElephantBaby wrote: So this OSL is done, right? What about those GSL players who want to attend OSL, I bet there are some. Do they get the "freedom" to do so? The players have been consulted when they made this decision. I bet KeSPA also "consulted", whatever that means. I don't think you understand the difference between the two organizations.
So ESF made the decision to help GOM, isn't it? Certainly not helping Players, because they can certainly get more media coverage from attending OSL rather than withdrewal. How is that different from what KeSPA's doing?
At least KeSPA give them up front notice, what ESF is doing is throwing away my 2 years college credits, and says college degree means nothing, you better stay home to help family business.
|
On August 27 2012 05:02 Salazarz wrote: You're either really naive or really stupid if you think any given players could decide to go against eSF / GomTV deciding something like that move. :\ As far as I understand it Oz takes part. He is a GSL player, but on a non eSF team like MC (who rejects to take part).
|
On August 27 2012 05:02 Salazarz wrote: You're either really naive or really stupid if you think any given players could decide to go against eSF / GomTV deciding something like that move. :\ MC or Oz certainly could have. It doesn't even matter actually, you can compete in Gom leagues even if you're not part of eSF.
|
On August 27 2012 05:02 Salazarz wrote: You're either really naive or really stupid if you think any given players could decide to go against eSF / GomTV deciding something like that move. :\
Exactly, GSL players are puppy too in this case.
|
|
|
|