|
Northern Ireland23751 Posts
On August 14 2012 08:23 AndAgain wrote: I just hope HOTS does something to make protoss matchups more dynamic. Both PvZ and PvT both appear to have been "solved" if players are of similar skill. In PvZ, it's trying to get an archon toilet against BL-infestor-spines. In PvT it's about having proper HT-Ghost-Colossi-viking ratios and controlling them well. Also notice that these matchups usually come down to maxed armies- that's another thing I would like to see go away. I really don't think PvT is that bad a matchup now, there's a lot more skirmishing, at least when top Koreans are playing. Agreed with PvZ, but that's as much an issue with Zerg as it is with Protoss
|
On August 14 2012 08:28 Wombat_NI wrote:Show nested quote +On August 14 2012 08:23 AndAgain wrote: I just hope HOTS does something to make protoss matchups more dynamic. Both PvZ and PvT both appear to have been "solved" if players are of similar skill. In PvZ, it's trying to get an archon toilet against BL-infestor-spines. In PvT it's about having proper HT-Ghost-Colossi-viking ratios and controlling them well. Also notice that these matchups usually come down to maxed armies- that's another thing I would like to see go away. I really don't think PvT is that bad a matchup now, there's a lot more skirmishing, at least when top Koreans are playing. Agreed with PvZ, but that's as much an issue with Zerg as it is with Protoss PvT is actually the best non mirror right now.
But yeah, please make PvZ interesting. Buff Stargate, change MS vs BL dynamic, give Zergs better ways to deal with things aside from the Infestor, make both sides have timings that aren't all-in but which are reliable. That would fix a lot.
|
On August 14 2012 08:49 Shiori wrote:Show nested quote +On August 14 2012 08:28 Wombat_NI wrote:On August 14 2012 08:23 AndAgain wrote: I just hope HOTS does something to make protoss matchups more dynamic. Both PvZ and PvT both appear to have been "solved" if players are of similar skill. In PvZ, it's trying to get an archon toilet against BL-infestor-spines. In PvT it's about having proper HT-Ghost-Colossi-viking ratios and controlling them well. Also notice that these matchups usually come down to maxed armies- that's another thing I would like to see go away. I really don't think PvT is that bad a matchup now, there's a lot more skirmishing, at least when top Koreans are playing. Agreed with PvZ, but that's as much an issue with Zerg as it is with Protoss PvT is actually the best non mirror right now. But yeah, please make PvZ interesting. Buff Stargate, change MS vs BL dynamic, give Zergs better ways to deal with things aside from the Infestor, make both sides have timings that aren't all-in but which are reliable. That would fix a lot.
Nope, TvZ is back at the top.
|
On August 14 2012 08:49 Shiori wrote:Show nested quote +On August 14 2012 08:28 Wombat_NI wrote:On August 14 2012 08:23 AndAgain wrote: I just hope HOTS does something to make protoss matchups more dynamic. Both PvZ and PvT both appear to have been "solved" if players are of similar skill. In PvZ, it's trying to get an archon toilet against BL-infestor-spines. In PvT it's about having proper HT-Ghost-Colossi-viking ratios and controlling them well. Also notice that these matchups usually come down to maxed armies- that's another thing I would like to see go away. I really don't think PvT is that bad a matchup now, there's a lot more skirmishing, at least when top Koreans are playing. Agreed with PvZ, but that's as much an issue with Zerg as it is with Protoss PvT is actually the best non mirror right now. But yeah, please make PvZ interesting. Buff Stargate, change MS vs BL dynamic, give Zergs better ways to deal with things aside from the Infestor, make both sides have timings that aren't all-in but which are reliable. That would fix a lot.
Glad you made it official. I've been wondering what the best match up is currently.
|
|
On August 14 2012 08:54 Sroobz wrote:Show nested quote +On August 14 2012 08:49 Shiori wrote:On August 14 2012 08:28 Wombat_NI wrote:On August 14 2012 08:23 AndAgain wrote: I just hope HOTS does something to make protoss matchups more dynamic. Both PvZ and PvT both appear to have been "solved" if players are of similar skill. In PvZ, it's trying to get an archon toilet against BL-infestor-spines. In PvT it's about having proper HT-Ghost-Colossi-viking ratios and controlling them well. Also notice that these matchups usually come down to maxed armies- that's another thing I would like to see go away. I really don't think PvT is that bad a matchup now, there's a lot more skirmishing, at least when top Koreans are playing. Agreed with PvZ, but that's as much an issue with Zerg as it is with Protoss PvT is actually the best non mirror right now. But yeah, please make PvZ interesting. Buff Stargate, change MS vs BL dynamic, give Zergs better ways to deal with things aside from the Infestor, make both sides have timings that aren't all-in but which are reliable. That would fix a lot. Nope, TvZ is back at the top. If T means Taeja, yeah. Otherwise, no .
|
On August 14 2012 08:58 Luddff wrote: When will this be cet? Considering Blizzard is in Irvine and Sean is in LA I'd put my money on PDT.
|
Its gonna be a weirdass game with oracle play that fucks everything up. but Im still excited!
|
On August 10 2012 21:59 Tyree wrote: Armchair wannabe TL mods are the absolute worst, and every thread seems to get first couple of pages of "is this really thread worthy?" kind of responses.
If actual TL mods deem a thread pointless or not worthy, then they will close it down, as they have always done. Why shit up a thread if you dont care/dont think its thread worthy?
Ill be watching this battle report, i had no idea one was coming out. Thread did its job of informing me Adding agreement with this.
|
On August 14 2012 09:52 Jrocker152 wrote:Show nested quote +On August 10 2012 21:59 Tyree wrote: Armchair wannabe TL mods are the absolute worst, and every thread seems to get first couple of pages of "is this really thread worthy?" kind of responses.
If actual TL mods deem a thread pointless or not worthy, then they will close it down, as they have always done. Why shit up a thread if you dont care/dont think its thread worthy?
Ill be watching this battle report, i had no idea one was coming out. Thread did its job of informing me Adding agreement with this.
It should be bannable to armchair mod. Extra commandment or something.
|
On August 14 2012 10:00 Rah wrote:Show nested quote +On August 14 2012 09:52 Jrocker152 wrote:On August 10 2012 21:59 Tyree wrote: Armchair wannabe TL mods are the absolute worst, and every thread seems to get first couple of pages of "is this really thread worthy?" kind of responses.
If actual TL mods deem a thread pointless or not worthy, then they will close it down, as they have always done. Why shit up a thread if you dont care/dont think its thread worthy?
Ill be watching this battle report, i had no idea one was coming out. Thread did its job of informing me Adding agreement with this. It should be bannable to armchair mod. Extra commandment or something. Not sure if sarcastic...
|
|
On August 14 2012 10:17 Za7oX wrote: how long?
1 hour aprox
|
says 30 mins, hngggg can't wait that long
|
This new map looks incredibly bad.
|
uhh the youtube video is out already just click the link
|
|
On August 14 2012 10:23 Glurkenspurk wrote: This new map looks incredibly bad. Yea this map looks awful lol. But I think they just made it to showcase the terrain.
|
On August 14 2012 10:27 FinestHour wrote: uhh the youtube video is out already just click the link
shhh secrets!
|
lol mother ship core not needing any requirements basically says no to any more early game harass ahahahah
|
|
|
|