
Some KeSPA/MLG discrepancies? - Page 4
Forum Index > SC2 General |
Clafou
Belgium921 Posts
![]() | ||
Dreadwolf
Canada220 Posts
On May 11 2012 23:42 SundanceMLG wrote: KeSPA approved our release and we approved theirs. no need to start more conspiracies. Conspiracies will be made until we know for sure what is going on, atm, we dont know. We know bw players are comming, we know they are going to play their own little tournament. But what does it mean for the future? we dont know. Will MLG have some sort of seeding of kespa player? Will mlg winners have some seeding in kespa run tournaments? if they do will korean player not member of kespa allowed to take those seed by kespa if they win? What about showmatch, if i have i ton of money and i want a showmatch between.. Parting and Bisu, can Bisu even come? What about charity even not run by mlg can they play for those? What about streaming will kespa allow their player to stream? Kespa has really really really shity reputation. You cant expect people to see only angels and flowers when you make a deal with the devil and make it exclusive ton top of it. We dont know how Kespa will manage their team and player for sc2, but if its anything like sc1.. its not good news for the players on kespa that are not top 10, its not good for the current korean teams either. | ||
jmbthirteen
United States10734 Posts
On May 11 2012 23:53 MCDayC wrote: Sundance's post still doesn't answer the question of exclusivity... Are the Kespa players able to go to other western tournaments or not? look at the pic on page 2 of this thread | ||
Doodsmack
United States7224 Posts
| ||
Postman
United States269 Posts
I hope MLG got everything in airtight contracts this time, to spare everyone the confusion and embarrassment. | ||
Dosey
United States4505 Posts
On May 12 2012 03:31 Dreadwolf wrote: Kespa has really really really shity reputation. You cant expect people to see only angels and flowers when you make a deal with the devil and make it exclusive ton top of it. You clearly don't know MLGs reputation when it comes to competition of their business. They are worse than KeSPA. | ||
GreEny K
Germany7312 Posts
| ||
Apollo_Shards
1210 Posts
On May 11 2012 23:42 SundanceMLG wrote: KeSPA approved our release and we approved theirs. no need to start more conspiracies. Now back to finding drama where it isnt there. | ||
ZAiNs
United Kingdom6525 Posts
On May 12 2012 03:00 Clafou wrote: One thing I still don't understand... Will there be BW pros playing in the open bracket with SC2 pros? Or is there an unique exhibition tournament for all the BW pros? ![]() The latter. The BW players won't be good enough to win big tournaments for a few months. | ||
Clafou
Belgium921 Posts
![]() | ||
imre
France9263 Posts
On May 12 2012 04:52 Apollo_Shards wrote: Now back to finding drama where it isnt there. prove that KeSPA approved their release ? believing their PR without checking isn't the best thing to do (and if you prove it I'd be happy) | ||
jmbthirteen
United States10734 Posts
On May 12 2012 04:48 Dosey wrote: You clearly don't know MLGs reputation when it comes to competition of their business. They are worse than KeSPA. You really despise MLG dont you? Sundance piss in your cheerios? | ||
MCXD
Australia2738 Posts
On May 12 2012 02:59 dsousa wrote: Once Kespa players are at SC2 pro level, it makes no sense to keep them out of other foreign tournements. I mean, they like money, don't they? So does MLG. | ||
-_-
United States7081 Posts
On May 11 2012 23:42 SundanceMLG wrote: KeSPA approved our release and we approved theirs. no need to start more conspiracies. What does 'exclusive, multi-year' actually mean? For example, will you able to prevent KESPA players from playing in other tournaments if they want to? | ||
| ||