EPTOn April 27 2012 10:19 Sajaki wrote:
Nothing about TvP lategame what a joke.
Nothing about TvP lategame what a joke.
Seriously they must not read.
Talking Balance with David Kim - Page 2
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
DooMDash
United States1015 Posts
Seriously they must not read. | ||
|
Goshawk.
United Kingdom5338 Posts
On April 27 2012 10:28 Kira__ wrote: keep in mind that the stats shown there are ALL leagues... so they mean fuck all. So painful to have these stats analyzed and used as justifications when they reflect every league. -_- | ||
|
L3g3nd_
New Zealand10461 Posts
EDIT: oh god its from all leagues? that is 100 times worse. | ||
|
DooMDash
United States1015 Posts
| ||
|
xrapture
United States1644 Posts
On April 27 2012 10:35 L3g3nd_ wrote: taking stats from ladder as balance is the worst idea i have EVER seen EDIT: oh god its from all leagues? that is 100 times worse. why? they said they care about balance in all leagues. If there is a huge disparity when the ladder is supposed to be designed for 50% win rates their is obviously something wrong. | ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
We'll see what happens, maybe a new biomech composition needs to be dreamed up or something. edit: also this comes from a protoss player | ||
|
Account252508
3454 Posts
| ||
|
akalarry
United States1978 Posts
This article is an absolute joke. | ||
|
-Kyo-
Japan1927 Posts
O well.. I guess we can expect only so much T_T | ||
|
Encrypto
United States442 Posts
On April 27 2012 10:36 xrapture wrote: why? they said they care about balance in all leagues. If there is a huge disparity when the ladder is supposed to be designed for 50% win rates their is obviously something wrong. Balance in each individual league is very different than balance overall. | ||
|
Bagration
United States18282 Posts
| ||
|
canikizu
4860 Posts
| ||
|
Sajaki
Canada1135 Posts
On April 27 2012 10:14 Encrypto wrote: In our current map pool, we’re seeing that not every map we’ve added to our pool is balanced for every matchup. For example, our data shows a 70% PvT win ratio on Cloud Kingdom, a 62% win ratio in PvZ on Korhal Compound, and a 37% win ratio on Metalopolis for TvZ. It’s worth noting that these represent the heaviest imbalances in the maps on our ladder, but that this also isn’t necessarily a problem. Our current stance on this is we believe slight imbalances in maps actually make the game more interesting, as long as the imbalances aren’t too great. 70%, 62% and 37% aren't too great? What? | ||
|
tomatriedes
New Zealand5356 Posts
http://imgur.com/a/XmBDV | ||
|
turdburgler
England6749 Posts
i genuinely want to know how this could possibly be done | ||
|
radscorpion9
Canada2252 Posts
 | ||
|
Holytornados
United States1022 Posts
On April 27 2012 10:19 Sajaki wrote: Nothing about TvP lategame what a joke. Micro better? Terran has the higher skill cap for a reason =D Edit: I like the current balance. I'm curious if they are going to do anything about the map imbalance in the foreseeable future. | ||
|
Meerel
Germany713 Posts
On April 27 2012 10:42 turdburgler wrote: how exactly do they work out 'unadjusted skill' from ladder when the whole ladder adjusts for your skill so you only get 50% when its working? i genuinely want to know how this could possibly be done only blizzard knows ~~ | ||
|
tomatriedes
New Zealand5356 Posts
On April 27 2012 10:36 Dodgin wrote: I'll be real, anyone who watches or plays enough sc2 knows that Protoss is too favored in the late game vs Terran at the moment. I'm not sure if there just needs to be a metagame shift or if they actually have to patch something or adjust maps, but It's starting to get kind of silly. We'll see what happens, maybe a new biomech composition needs to be dreamed up or something. edit: also this comes from a protoss player Terran is still favored earlier game and has better overall win rates both in Korea and internationally at the highest level. Why would they patch it when terran still has better win rates at tournament level? http://imgur.com/a/XmBDV | ||
|
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
| ||
| ||
