StarCraft II World Championship Series - Page 10
Forum Index > SC2 General |
WombaT
Northern Ireland23095 Posts
| ||
emc
United States3088 Posts
| ||
firehand101
Australia3152 Posts
| ||
KiLL_ORdeR
United States1518 Posts
| ||
LesPhoques
Canada782 Posts
On April 05 2012 09:59 emc wrote: how come NA and SA are seperate but CN/TW/KR are all together and SEA is by itself? I don't think there is enough talent in the SEA community (sorry, I mean who do you have besides moonglade?) and there is too much talent in KR. I think SEA/CN/TW should be together, KR alone and NA/SA together as well. Really good point. However, I think they thought there might be lag problems if SEA/CN/TW were playing each other. KR/CN/TW will have a lot less lag, and CN/TW don't really have talent to take on Korea so it won't make much difference, except Aussies having easier road. | ||
jeffvip
211 Posts
On April 05 2012 01:53 littlesaint wrote: I like the idea with continets but its not fair. far from fair. Everyone knows that North- south america and Oceania is worse then Asia and Europe. So like the players that come in round of 36 in korea and round 8 in Europe is better then the best players in North- south america and Oceania. So what i say is that i would like 8 players from North- South America. 2 from Oceania. 8 from Europe. 16 from Asia. Or something like that. I love this idea. Since Europe is getting all the candy in FIFA World Cup, why can't Asia (esp Korea) have this kind of treatment in SC. | ||
YourGoodFriend
United States2197 Posts
| ||
Lucoda
Ireland183 Posts
| ||
onPHYRE
Bulgaria885 Posts
| ||
sephirotharg
United States91 Posts
Other than that, really excited for this tournament! | ||
ColterTV
Argentina163 Posts
On April 05 2012 06:05 Adsee wrote: They don't have servers based in Africa If that matters, they don't have servers in South America either, they are all US based. | ||
Daehlie
United States43 Posts
| ||
birchman
Sweden393 Posts
| ||
Holytornados
United States1022 Posts
I think we can all agree that Desert Oasis is and will always be the best ladder map of all time. | ||
Solo Terran
367 Posts
On April 05 2012 01:26 VirgilSC2 wrote: Please don't use the ladder map pool Please don't use the ladder map pool Please don't use the ladder map pool I'm pretty sure this guy just means: don't use the ladder versions of the maps because they dont have neutral supply depots and thn you could have players cheese their way to victory with double bunker wall offs and pylon-cannon blocks. | ||
Craminit
United States58 Posts
| ||
Shellshock
United States97274 Posts
On April 05 2012 13:02 Holytornados wrote: I think we can all agree that Desert Oasis is and will always be the best ladder map of all time. wrong. Delta Quadrant because it had the most destructible rocks! | ||
Drake
Germany6146 Posts
| ||
Ownos
United States2147 Posts
| ||
cArn-
Korea (South)824 Posts
On April 05 2012 01:26 NexUmbra wrote: Do you think you have what it takes to compete at the Battle.net World Championship? No. This is so racist no Africa! ye why no Africa | ||
| ||