EPTnot too sure why I post
Number of Pros that Lurk - Page 4
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
KawaiiRice
United States2914 Posts
not too sure why I post | ||
|
Snettik
Finland186 Posts
EDIT: also i'm too dumb to see what is a retarded strategy post and what is not so it's really hard to actually get anything out of the strategy forum | ||
|
ShatterStorm
Australia146 Posts
On January 02 2012 20:30 Dunedain wrote: TL should enter a minimum post league, that way bronze people can't argue and post stupid things. I believe the high level players will post more then and the stupid comments will stay away Nice thought, but there are idiots in every league. Sure, the Idiot Masters and Grand masters players posts would have a better grounding in game theory and strategy, but that would be the only differentiator for post quality from some Bronze nub thinking he knows best. You'd still have the fan boys and arrogant posters in spades EDIT: not saying everyone is an idiot, just that individuals who are idiots can be found regardless of league. | ||
|
dementrio
678 Posts
On January 02 2012 20:50 Snettik wrote: It would actually be nice if there would be a forum where only pros/people who know about sc2 could post and most people would just read it (like me and other noobs). That would pretty much be the opposite of TL these days. Pro posts get buried under a mountain of shit. Yes! or maybe pick back up the blue poster idea and have an option to nuke all non-blue posts. | ||
|
Willzzz
United Kingdom774 Posts
 | ||
|
nam nam
Sweden4672 Posts
On January 02 2012 20:50 Snettik wrote: It would actually be nice if there would be a forum where only pros/people who know about sc2 could post and most people would just read it (like me and other noobs). That would pretty much be the opposite of TL these days. Pro posts get buried under a mountain of shit. I think this was discussed during the last update of the TL forums but it seemed they was hesitant to make such a separation though they might consider it in the future. Not 100 % if I remember that correctly but it should be somewhere in the forums. | ||
|
LeLfe
France3160 Posts
On January 02 2012 20:44 KawaiiRice wrote: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=295998¤tpage=2#27 not too sure why I post From what I've read from you, you're a smart cookie a therefore prolly know it, but I'll still will say it: TL is like everywhere else, there is a loud (and annoying) minority criticizing and trying to demolish any attempt of building something and the quiet minority who actually enjoys what is done. When I read a pro's insight on TL, i usually feel "thankful" for the time taken to explain what it really was about, but will i post "thx for the analysis"? no, it would just be somekind of flood in this ocean of nuthudging , so no oint posting if no relevant question. Most people respect and enjoy that pros are sharing their knowledge and so on, so I do think it's still worth it and just don't bother losing your time dealing with hate/ignorance | ||
|
Geiko
France1936 Posts
I've found myself in this situation once or twice when I was completely sure that what the pro posted was wrong, but was cautious enough to keep my mouth shut ( and then discovered some time after that I was wrong... ). | ||
|
Flonomenalz
Nigeria3519 Posts
However, this would of course ostracize the majority of players that are below diamond (which make up a LOT of the community) and would take a lot of thought to be implemented correctly. It really is getting annoying though to have SO many posts that unfortunately are clueless about the game make up the majority of posts in strat sections... | ||
|
Origine
France167 Posts
| ||
|
Deleuze
United Kingdom2102 Posts
On January 02 2012 20:44 KawaiiRice wrote: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=295998¤tpage=2#27 not too sure why I post For the love of god please continue to post!! | ||
|
Black[CAT]
Malaysia2589 Posts
| ||
|
Sneakyz
Sweden2361 Posts
On January 02 2012 20:54 nam nam wrote: I think this was discussed during the last update of the TL forums but it seemed they was hesitant to make such a separation though they might consider it in the future. Not 100 % if I remember that correctly but it should be somewhere in the forums. There was a system like that on the WoW PvP forum Arenajunkies, where only people who achieved gladiator (top 0.5%) in one of the seasons could post in the strat forum. Granted there were a lot less stupid posts than the unrestricted part of the forum, there were still a shit ton of them. I think you would need a very high restriction for something like that to give good results, probably only established pros. | ||
|
B.I.G.
3251 Posts
| ||
|
Saechiis
Netherlands4989 Posts
Really wish that there was a Strategy forums for people that acknowledge they don't know shit, even at Masters I only know macro and basic timings. | ||
|
Jedclark
United Kingdom903 Posts
| ||
|
decaf
Austria1797 Posts
On January 02 2012 19:36 IdrA wrote: no it actually is that people are imbeciles. any time a known player posts they risk someone picking an argument with them for the hell of it, or just having some random person go "lolol you got raped by x last week how can you post" or "why are you posting instead of practicing you're terrible" I don't understand why you still wouldn't post in the strat section and trust mods to ban those people. The purge changed things a little bit I think. | ||
Kipsate
Netherlands45349 Posts
its impossible to discuss it with people when half the people nuthugg(nice word lol) and the other ones have to bring up some form of WELL I SAW YOUR STREAM or WELL, HOW ABOUT YOU DO THAT YOURESLF, CAUSE IN GAME X VS Y YOU DIDNT DO THAT etc. | ||
|
Apoo
413 Posts
| ||
|
Neelia
Germany599 Posts
On January 02 2012 21:14 Jedclark wrote: Perhaps pros/GM players could get an icon or something so they are easily identifiable. Their posts are already highlighted the strategy forum? | ||
| ||
