EPTAlso that Terran seems to bounce back from any temporary drops in win rates very quickly.
[GSL] Race Winrate Graphs - Page 2
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
QTIP.
United States2113 Posts
Also that Terran seems to bounce back from any temporary drops in win rates very quickly. | ||
|
Toadvine
Poland2234 Posts
On October 14 2011 01:22 Fleebu wrote: Maybe you should also look at the percentage of people in Korea who actually play Protoss... Lower than Terran, higher than Zerg. It's like 36% Terran, 33% Protoss and 31% Zerg in Korean Pro Teams. In Korean GM it's a bit more Terran skewed, but similar overall. | ||
|
Alejandrisha
United States6565 Posts
On October 14 2011 01:29 Roxy wrote: Very Interesting It is a shame that all of the skilled players chose terran.. wish i could see some protoss innovate new strategies but alas all of the protoss players are scrubs I guess they just pick terran because it is the hardest race to play and we all know koreans love high APM this is the kind of reasoning that blows my mind | ||
|
windsupernova
Mexico5280 Posts
Does this include GSTL? Or are you only including GSL Sponsor tournaments? But then off course Zergs are going to ignore that Terran against Zerg is fine and jump on the T OP bandwagon. | ||
|
QTIP.
United States2113 Posts
On October 14 2011 01:31 Alejandrisha wrote: this is the kind of reasoning that blows my mind It's not even reasoning, it's just blind assumption. | ||
|
Caesarion
Australia8332 Posts
On October 14 2011 01:31 Alejandrisha wrote: this is the kind of reasoning that blows my mind His sig says that he's a masters protoss. It's most likely sarcasm directed at those who seem to think percentage of terrans should affect winrates. | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States43768 Posts
On October 14 2011 01:29 Roxy wrote: Very Interesting It is a shame that all of the skilled players chose terran.. wish i could see some protoss innovate new strategies but alas all of the protoss players are scrubs I guess they just pick terran because it is the hardest race to play and we all know koreans love high APM It's a shame that all of the skilled StarCraft units chose to join the Terran race. I wish I could see some Protoss units innovate some new skills and tech, but alas all of the Protoss units are scrubs. Ah, much better. | ||
|
InFi.asc
Germany518 Posts
On October 14 2011 01:31 windsupernova wrote: Just what i was saying. TvZ is fine. P is doing badly in both of its MUs atm. Does this include GSTL? Or are you only including GSL Sponsor tournaments? But then off course Zergs are going to ignore that Terran against Zerg is fine and jump on the T OP bandwagon. No GSTL data is included here. See OP for what's included. | ||
|
Nouar
France3270 Posts
On October 14 2011 01:24 InFi.asc wrote: on top of that this is a winning percentage. doesn't matter how many people play a race  Yes it does. Let's say there are 40% terrans, 35% zergs and 25% protoss *players*, there is a higher chance to have more top terrans than top protoss.... Hence a higher win rate percentage for terrans vs protoss since there are more good terrans than good protoss... Before being flamed, I have to add : YES I do think toss a doing worse for a reason, not ONLY more terrans etc... but it DOES play a role *as well*, mathematically speaking. | ||
|
Tsubbi
Germany7967 Posts
as torch once said, terran isn't imba, its just better or yellows first reaction to terran: a dropship that can heal? what kind of imba unit is this? | ||
|
InFi.asc
Germany518 Posts
On October 14 2011 01:35 Nouar wrote: Yes it does. Let's say there are 40% terrans, 35% zergs and 25% protoss *players*, there is a higher chance to have more top terrans than top protoss.... Hence a higher win rate percentage for terrans vs protoss since there are more good terrans than good protoss... Before being flamed, I have to add : YES I do think toss a doing worse for a reason, not ONLY more terrans etc... but it DOES play a role *as well*, mathematically speaking. You're right about that but the real numbers are so close the impact should be minimal. Nevertheless, I stay corrected | ||
|
Arcanne
United States1519 Posts
On October 14 2011 01:29 Roxy wrote: Very Interesting It is a shame that all of the skilled players chose terran.. wish i could see some protoss innovate new strategies but alas all of the protoss players are scrubs I guess they just pick terran because it is the hardest race to play and we all know koreans love high APM Where did you acquire such great logic? Must be your education. | ||
|
Zic
Canada32 Posts
| ||
|
Kira__
Sweden2672 Posts
| ||
|
InFi.asc
Germany518 Posts
On October 14 2011 01:40 Arcanne wrote: Where did you acquire such great logic? Must be your education. Please don't turn this into a flame fest and please consider if someone might be using sarcasm | ||
|
CHOMPMannER
Canada175 Posts
Maybe if tournaments used proper ladder maps we wouldn't see Protoss losing so much. | ||
|
ZenithM
France15952 Posts
R.I.P. MC :'( R.I.P. Protoss :'(( | ||
|
Roxy
Canada753 Posts
On October 14 2011 01:33 Caesarion wrote: His sig says that he's a masters protoss. It's most likely sarcasm directed at those who seem to think percentage of terrans should affect winrates. Props to you, good sir You are the only person that picked up on this I thought my comment was rather obvious faulty logic, but i guess i'm sneakier than i give myself credit for | ||
|
Arcanne
United States1519 Posts
On October 14 2011 01:41 InFi.asc wrote: Please don't turn this into a flame fest and please consider if someone might be using sarcasm I'm not being sarcastic. I want to know. | ||
|
bbm
United Kingdom1320 Posts
On October 14 2011 01:35 Nouar wrote: Yes it does. Let's say there are 40% terrans, 35% zergs and 25% protoss *players*, there is a higher chance to have more top terrans than top protoss.... Hence a higher win rate percentage for terrans vs protoss since there are more good terrans than good protoss... Before being flamed, I have to add : YES I do think toss a doing worse for a reason, not ONLY more terrans etc... but it DOES play a role *as well*, mathematically speaking. I don't follow.... surely there is a higher chance to have more rubbish terrans than rubbish protoss for the same reason? If you assume that each match is against another random person from the pool (it's not, but to model that would be far too complex and a waste of time), and you assume that race and skill are independent, then how could you hope to conclude that more terran means more anything? | ||
| ||
