EPTIntroducing SC2 Manager - Page 33
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
HadesCP
Canada98 Posts
| ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
Can't wait to play! | ||
|
HaRuHi
1220 Posts
Also I didn't understand how the league systems work, like in which league are my players and when and why they can/can't sign up for tourneys. BESIDES those minor inconviences this game is so boss, I see me wasting so much time playing it...goodbye sc2, hello sc2 manager. xD | ||
|
Ballack
Norway821 Posts
| ||
|
GizmoPT
Portugal3040 Posts
On August 31 2011 00:37 HaRuHi wrote: I had a chance to play yesterday for a short amount of time. Seems strategy is pretty useless, as no matter who played what the player with a slight edge in stats always won. Also I didn't understand how the league systems work, like in which league are my players and when and why they can/can't sign up for tourneys. BESIDES those minor inconviences this game is so boss, I see me wasting so much time playing it...goodbye sc2, hello sc2 manager. xD startegies are really important if you really want to win tournaments cause if both players are equally good then strategies matters a lot | ||
|
Benjef
United Kingdom6921 Posts
| ||
|
S2Lunar
1051 Posts
On August 31 2011 00:41 Benjef wrote: Any tips and hints for strats? The pre made ones seem a bit meh should you make strats for each guy? I made a 4gate strategy for protoss, seems to work about as much as the balanced one though.  | ||
|
PodBlake
France206 Posts
| ||
Aocowns
Norway6070 Posts
 He made it to the RO4 on his first tourny | ||
|
Percutio
United States1672 Posts
I readjusted some specific things (Mostly harder macro early on) because they seemed to help a tiny bit. I also would pick some counter strategies for my ace if he made it deep into tournies (Basically I would pick more or less aggressive builds depending on my opponent's build). My ace had decent stats though. My crap players could only reliably win with balanced as they messed everything else up pretty bad. | ||
|
Tidus Mino
United Kingdom1108 Posts
Another thing you could possibly add would be a "Home-Hero" the chance to start off with a player from your home country | ||
|
Aocowns
Norway6070 Posts
| ||
|
Keype
Sweden455 Posts
On August 31 2011 00:39 GizmoPT wrote: startegies are really important if you really want to win tournaments cause if both players are equally good then strategies matters a lot Ye I have won games with a ZvT of 1,2 against a terran with TvZ at 7.2 because of strategies. So I would say that is often more important really.. | ||
|
Brainfart
Germany91 Posts
On August 31 2011 00:48 Keype wrote: Ye I have won games with a ZvT of 1,2 against a terran with TvZ at 7.2 because of strategies. So I would say that is often more important really.. Stamina is a HUGE factor in these cases.. did you check the other guys stamina before the match? I got the feeling it is much more important than a specific strategy, if he is extremly fatigue he will mess up.. | ||
|
Zeke50100
United States2220 Posts
On August 31 2011 00:47 Aocowns wrote: What is best between Basic Z/T/P and balanced though? My players were pretty strong in general, although I stuck with Basic Zerg with tweaks made to it (better scouting, more frequent attacks, use of macro mechanic at the proper moment, etc.) and it tended to win games. I went on a bit of a losing streak after modifying it a bit to have Defend in periods of times, so I promptly switched back >.> My Protoss strategy didn't work out so well for me, though. Theoretically, AfterStiff (I know) was a pretty decent player with 6/5/4 in Macro/Micro/Multitasking, with killer PvZ and decent PvP, but he lost plenty of games even at full Stamina. Also, screw matchups. My most frequent winner, RaidersQTX.OpenNet, with a winrate of 80%+ throughout his career, had 7 Ma/6 Mi/5.5 Mu, and consistently placed in the top 4 of tournaments DESPITE having matchups all at 2.5 or lower. His Calmness was also 5.5, which probably helped during longer series. | ||
|
KepowOb
Canada24 Posts
| ||
|
Zeke50100
United States2220 Posts
On August 31 2011 00:55 KepowOb wrote: I agree that strategies can make a difference, but require some tweaking... player skills are more important though. If you have a player who is really good at micro and horrible at macro (or vise versa) I'd suggest giving them something which uses their skillset too. However, I find that having somebody with balanced Macro, Micro, and Multitasking is much better than having 1.2 Macro and 9.8 Micro I shoot for players with at least in 4 in all of those categories, preferably with an average of 5, 5.5, or 6. | ||
|
pStar
996 Posts
| ||
|
Tigi
Germany472 Posts
On August 31 2011 00:52 Brainfart wrote: Stamina is a HUGE factor in these cases.. did you check the other guys stamina before the match? I got the feeling it is much more important than a specific strategy, if he is extremly fatigue he will mess up.. Or his opponent was a Idra GGer :D:D | ||
|
HaRuHi
1220 Posts
But in team tourneys he would show up and even though I had 3 good players he would always show up to drop a game or ruin a series. xD | ||
| ||
