|
On June 22 2011 03:53 ShnAndrei wrote: Someone should link this thread on the Blizzard forums. I am from EU so I will be able to do so only on EU. But Blizzard may only check US forums as far as I know.
They know what the community wants, it's just not in line with what they want so they choose to ignore us mostly.
|
On June 22 2011 03:55 Karthane wrote:Show nested quote +On June 22 2011 03:53 ShnAndrei wrote: Someone should link this thread on the Blizzard forums. I am from EU so I will be able to do so only on EU. But Blizzard may only check US forums as far as I know. They know what the community wants, it's just not in line with what they want so they choose to ignore us mostly. Damn you Blizzard for not catering to my every whim!
|
|
Crevasse/Terminus both such great maps:!))
|
On June 22 2011 03:59 Bagi wrote:Show nested quote +On June 22 2011 03:55 Karthane wrote:On June 22 2011 03:53 ShnAndrei wrote: Someone should link this thread on the Blizzard forums. I am from EU so I will be able to do so only on EU. But Blizzard may only check US forums as far as I know. They know what the community wants, it's just not in line with what they want so they choose to ignore us mostly. Damn you Blizzard for not catering to my every whim!
Well when they list maps like Slag Pits as a "macro map", it gets a tad discouraging.
|
Xel naga fortress, dual sight, and crossfire are awesome imo If i would have to pick one, it would be dual sight prob.
|
You know if they put in crevasse, the back expo is going to have 8 patches, 2 geysers, and destructible rocks, right?
I think Blizzard is looking at these GSL maps and trying to take some features that they want, while avoiding some. They are using destructible rocks to shrink a choke (like crevasse) in one map, and having an easy-to-take third that shares a choke with the natural, but has destructible rocks behind it (like terminus). They are just still hesitant to put bases with only 6 mineral patches and 1 geyser. I think they'll eventually have to cave on this, because having less profitable bases opens up possibilities for a lot more interesting maps.
|
Blizzard has a sub par map team compared to GSL ICCUP and the community.
|
Imo it would be a disgrace if they don't add either Crevasse or Terminus, the community has been asking for it for ages, and if they keep coming out with shit-maps themselves then they kinda have to listen after a while.. Imagine this; Slag pits, Delta Quadrant & Scrap Station out: Crevasse, Terminus and Dual Sight in. That would be such a great map pool, still some blizzard maps, and some maps that we actually see being played in freaking tournaments.
|
How about this question. Would you like any blizzard maps in the season 3 map pool... answer.. no
|
On June 21 2011 20:24 Tofugrinder wrote: blizzard should just take the current GSL mappool and put it into ladder. If they did I'd ladder again
I doubt the current maps are the only reason you don't ladder. By doing this, they would have to do away with some good maps of their own. They just need to add a few.
|
On June 21 2011 20:30 DNB wrote: I would like to have Crevasse and Terminus SE in the pool, but I'm afraid to meet zerg on those maps, I have even vetoed Tal'Darim because I used to have like 10% winrate on it... :S I already know on Crevasse there would be rocks blocking your in base nat and on Terminus it would block your 3rd. Also blizzard would make every other base a gold base.
|
crevasse and terminus would be awesome, i think crevasse would fit really well
|
On June 22 2011 04:05 Fyzar wrote: Imo it would be a disgrace if they don't add either Crevasse or Terminus, the community has been asking for it for ages, and if they keep coming out with shit-maps themselves then they kinda have to listen after a while.. Imagine this; Slag pits, Delta Quadrant & Scrap Station out: Crevasse, Terminus and Dual Sight in. That would be such a great map pool, still some blizzard maps, and some maps that we actually see being played in freaking tournaments.
+1 I so much agree with you!! If only Blizzard would listen.
|
I would like every gsl map in the pool !
|
On June 22 2011 04:03 Karthane wrote:Show nested quote +On June 22 2011 03:59 Bagi wrote:On June 22 2011 03:55 Karthane wrote:On June 22 2011 03:53 ShnAndrei wrote: Someone should link this thread on the Blizzard forums. I am from EU so I will be able to do so only on EU. But Blizzard may only check US forums as far as I know. They know what the community wants, it's just not in line with what they want so they choose to ignore us mostly. Damn you Blizzard for not catering to my every whim! Well when they list maps like Slag Pits as a "macro map", it gets a tad discouraging.
lol did you guys read about the first map they introduced? they say it is not a rush map and then they say it kinda is.
|
Bel'Shir Beach or Terminus SE. I believe these two maps produce the best games. Kind of surprised to see Crevasse that high, can't really remember any epic matches that took place on that map.
|
Terminus could be really good with some edits. Right now it isn't up to quality. Crevasse is a very good option.
|
Terminus SE is excellent. I don't really get the hype around Crevasse, especially because it heavily favors 4gate in PvP. But other than that I don't think it's very interesting, Terminus is a lot better (and I like the tileset more).
|
Those big gsl maps are terrible for terran, I do not want any more gsl maps!
|
|
|
|