| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Karthane
United States1183 Posts
On June 22 2011 03:53 ShnAndrei wrote: Someone should link this thread on the Blizzard forums. I am from EU so I will be able to do so only on EU. But Blizzard may only check US forums as far as I know. They know what the community wants, it's just not in line with what they want so they choose to ignore us mostly. | ||
|
Bagi
Germany6799 Posts
On June 22 2011 03:55 Karthane wrote: They know what the community wants, it's just not in line with what they want so they choose to ignore us mostly. Damn you Blizzard for not catering to my every whim! | ||
|
QTIP.
United States2113 Posts
| ||
|
PeZuY
935 Posts
| ||
|
Karthane
United States1183 Posts
On June 22 2011 03:59 Bagi wrote: Damn you Blizzard for not catering to my every whim! Well when they list maps like Slag Pits as a "macro map", it gets a tad discouraging. | ||
|
thOr6136
Slovenia1775 Posts
 If i would have to pick one, it would be dual sight prob. | ||
|
regulator_mk
United States127 Posts
I think Blizzard is looking at these GSL maps and trying to take some features that they want, while avoiding some. They are using destructible rocks to shrink a choke (like crevasse) in one map, and having an easy-to-take third that shares a choke with the natural, but has destructible rocks behind it (like terminus). They are just still hesitant to put bases with only 6 mineral patches and 1 geyser. I think they'll eventually have to cave on this, because having less profitable bases opens up possibilities for a lot more interesting maps. | ||
|
OhMyGawd
United States264 Posts
| ||
|
Fyzar
Netherlands8010 Posts
Imagine this; Slag pits, Delta Quadrant & Scrap Station out: Crevasse, Terminus and Dual Sight in. That would be such a great map pool, still some blizzard maps, and some maps that we actually see being played in freaking tournaments. | ||
|
ckunkel1
United States181 Posts
| ||
|
Xova
United States342 Posts
On June 21 2011 20:24 Tofugrinder wrote: blizzard should just take the current GSL mappool and put it into ladder. If they did I'd ladder again I doubt the current maps are the only reason you don't ladder. By doing this, they would have to do away with some good maps of their own. They just need to add a few. | ||
|
Yung
United States727 Posts
On June 21 2011 20:30 DNB wrote: I would like to have Crevasse and Terminus SE in the pool, but I'm afraid to meet zerg on those maps, I have even vetoed Tal'Darim because I used to have like 10% winrate on it... :S I already know on Crevasse there would be rocks blocking your in base nat and on Terminus it would block your 3rd. Also blizzard would make every other base a gold base. | ||
|
Elite__
Canada976 Posts
| ||
|
ShnAndrei
Romania164 Posts
On June 22 2011 04:05 Fyzar wrote: Imo it would be a disgrace if they don't add either Crevasse or Terminus, the community has been asking for it for ages, and if they keep coming out with shit-maps themselves then they kinda have to listen after a while.. Imagine this; Slag pits, Delta Quadrant & Scrap Station out: Crevasse, Terminus and Dual Sight in. That would be such a great map pool, still some blizzard maps, and some maps that we actually see being played in freaking tournaments. +1 I so much agree with you!! If only Blizzard would listen. | ||
|
Moralez
Portugal1857 Posts
 | ||
|
Golgotha
Korea (South)8418 Posts
On June 22 2011 04:03 Karthane wrote: Well when they list maps like Slag Pits as a "macro map", it gets a tad discouraging. lol did you guys read about the first map they introduced? they say it is not a rush map and then they say it kinda is. | ||
|
VirtuallyJesse
United States398 Posts
| ||
|
DeltruS
Canada2214 Posts
Crevasse is a very good option. | ||
|
dani`
Netherlands2402 Posts
| ||
|
Zowon
Norway237 Posts
| ||
| ||
|
|
Replay Cast
Rogue vs Cure
Replay Cast
Big Brain Bouts
Garitos vs ArT
Lambo vs Percival
TriGGeR vs ByuN
Sparkling Tuna Cup
OSC
Shopify Rebellion Sundays
Mixu vs TBD
Spirit vs TBD
Clem vs TBD
Patches Events
OSC
Afreeca Starleague
Soma vs Shuttle
BeSt vs Rush
WardiTV Weekly
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
