Some constructive criticism for tasteless? - Page 37
Forum Index > SC2 General |
IrOnKaL
United States340 Posts
| ||
OneOther
United States10774 Posts
| ||
Twiggs
United States600 Posts
This OP should have been a PM to Tasteless. /End Thread | ||
Doodsmack
United States7224 Posts
On July 13 2012 15:52 yeint wrote: Just because you label your criticism as "constructive" doesn't make it that. Not constructive. The one example you gave is completely spurious. And even if your criticism was actually "constructive", Tasteless will not read this thread. The vast majority of posts since your necro have been subjective nonsense. Apart from completely unquantifiable things like "he's lost his passion" and "his game knowledge is poor", people are literally complaining that he fills dead air with jokes instead of "theorycrafting". This is subjective. This is your personal preference. I've skimmed through the last pages and I don't see a single example brought up by anyone that would illustrate his supposedly glaring lack of knowledge. Esports already is legitimate. There's nothing illegitimate about slightly off-color jokes. I suppose you think Louis CK's comedy is also aimed at adolescents (hint = it's not). Nice job cherry picking one sentence out of all my posts and calling me not constructive lol. Your example isn't even offensive because it's true that Tasteless has significant miss-calls in every game. Lets try an accurate assessment of my posts: " I only state this criticism because I think it would his casts with Artosis greatly" "Tasteless does neither and for the sake of making GSL casts even better than they are now, he should improve. " "I do enjoy Tastosis casts, but they still have a lot of untapped potential" "Increased game knowledge will always increase a caster's appeal" "I don't want to be too harsh because I appreciate the contributions he has made to the scene over the course of his career" "Therefore, even though I love Tastosis right now, I do think they could be even better if Tasteless knew his stuff." And I did provide an example of his low game knowledge in my necro post. I thought about posting a breakdown of a game I chose at random but figured it would be overly nit-picky and people would agree with the notion that his game knowledge is lower than it should be. And frankly if you don't think his game knowledge is low then I would question whether yours is any higher than his. But if you really think examples are necessary to prove the point I'll be happy to go back over some games. | ||
| ||