This thread is dedicated to how good IGN pro league stream is. If you have anything to say, negative or positive post it here!
What i noticed at first - Quality is 1080p, Seriuosly it looks like your watching a dvd! - Audio is amazing, Its crisp, sharp, response is good. - Custom artwork for the players, Almost resembles street fighter! - Professional casters that have a lot of experience in the casting field? YES PLEASE.
Leave a comment of your own, why you think this stream / league is amazing or if your disappointed :D
On April 22 2011 10:15 AimForTheBushes wrote: yeah, it's pretty good..but worth a thread?
Its worth more than a thread, IPL just laid down the bare minimum of production value for North American tournaments. Fans everywhere should be rejoicing.
wow im watching it atm and...seriously good job ign! the production value is off the charts good looking. the stream quality is amazing (and i live in frickin New Zealand!!) i have never seen a stream look this crystal clear. seriously gud job guys. so far igl > nasl
I don't like the single caster commentaries though... Seems too much like they're just throwing up random youtube games cast by the already established personalities.
On April 22 2011 10:17 Whiplash wrote: I tuned in to watch it and was instantly impressed. The production quality is INCREDIBLE. This is what the NASL should have been.
Yeah, because NASL is a thing of the past, the mistakes they made banished the league to the graveyard, it's horrible and not worth our time.
yes the ign proleague is a 10 its great, lets get over 10,000 viewers guys (only 200 more needed lol!!)
Why is it great you may ask? 5 reasons 1.casters are great and exciting 2.Player line up is great all of the NA players you know and love 3. stream is free, you can watch HQ for free 4. No lag or commericials on stream 5. graphics and lay out are amazing to sum it up this is a very proffessional run tournament and very entertaning.
Stream quality and audio quality Post-game splash screens with stylistic custom artwork and never-before-seen analysis amazing players and game quality Pretty much everything important.
The not as good:
No casting duos? player name announcer has Korean accent. Wat. Justin.tv (just because its the best so far doesn't mean it can't be improved :p)
On April 22 2011 10:15 nkwd wrote: no 30 min pre-show!
In what universe is having this option a bad thing? I really want to know. If you don't like it then tune in when the game starts and don't watch the pre-show. It literally is the EXACT same as not having the show.....
On April 22 2011 10:17 Eppa! wrote: Having no analytical commentators is pretty annoying.
I agree, listening to Wheat commentate alone is kind of annoying, just a wall of talking where he describes what's going on. It would be much better with a player cocasting.
Everything is great except they need two people casting imo... Also, it'd be appreciated if totalbiscuit could lower his wpm by about a hundred, down to 400 wpm.
Lastly, it's interesting to see a non-starcraft related organization's take on running a sc2 tournament. The whole cartoon/fighting game style player A vs player B thing was really cool between the matches. Looking forward to see what else they have in store.
1080p would be bluray quality.. 480p is dvd quality xDD.. but yeah it looks freaking sweet. the only downside is that ign wasn't able to secure guest accounts and people were able to search match history to figure out the progress of the tournament
Think alot of you guys are getting blinded by the superior production. All these game today are lopsided and fairly uninteresting matchups. (Aagh? Machine? Vibe?) Can't really get excited for those guys, and it just feels like I'm watching a cast of random games on youtube, only I get pretty graphics in between games. Still better than NASL for me today though, seeing as how I can't even get that stream for some reason.
wow i was going to pay for the vods but it seems like IGN is free right now? amazing. they have better production and casters than nasl but make it all free...
I love NASL and inc but if they want to compete, surely NASL must now step up.
On April 22 2011 10:15 nkwd wrote: no 30 min pre-show!
In what universe is having this option a bad thing? I really want to know. If you don't like it then tune in when the game starts and don't watch the pre-show. It literally is the EXACT same as not having the show.....
I agree with you in part, complaining a ton about a pre-show is dumb because you can just ignore it as though it was never there. However, some people want that analysis, map introduction and player introduction... Just not in such a huge chunk.
I would love a mini-preshow of about 3-4 minutes before every match instead of a long-ass pre-show at the start of the cast.
On April 22 2011 10:26 bokchoi wrote: 1080p would be bluray quality.. 480p is dvd quality xDD.. but yeah it looks freaking sweet. the only downside is that ign wasn't able to secure guest accounts and people were able to search match history to figure out the progress of the tournament
Someone should tell them about cloaked maps. they have the reach to quickly recruit someone to make cloaked versions of all the maps in their league
Gotta throw my support behind this over NASL in its current form. Took me all of 5 seconds to turn off the lag-fest with horrible casters and dedicate my attention to DJWheat and the IPL.
On April 22 2011 10:27 AimForTheBushes wrote: Think alot of you guys are getting blinded by the superior production. All these game today are lopsided and fairly uninteresting matchups. (Aagh? Machine? Vibe?) Can't really get excited for those guys, and it just feels like I'm watching a cast of random games on youtube, only I get pretty graphics in between games. Still better than NASL for me today though, seeing as how I can't even get that stream for some reason.
Well we're only talking about production right now. Obviously the quality of the games themselves are outside of anyone's control.
You can have a league with the best of the best and a TON of prize money, but if your production lacks then people won't watch if there is an alternative that is done well, even if the players aren't the most elite nor the prize pool as big
It sucks for NASL, because they do this day by day and the IPL matches were done a week in advance IIRC. Hopefully this will turn out better as time goes on (for NASL).
On April 22 2011 10:27 redviper wrote: How is their stream so good through justin.tv and NASL stream was having so much trouble also on justin.tv?
Some have professional ressources / staff, some don't.
nope if u read the ign thread all this is made by a website called wellplayed.org and it is all produced by VOLUNTEERS with little to zero experience in this kind of stuff. They are firsties just like nasl.
I have to admit I was VERY skeptical of the IGN proleague but color me impressed. Maybe I had my expectations set low because of the NASL but my first impression of the IPL is very positive. Great stream quality, great audio, no lag, and cool player graphics/art. I would not have chosen the casters they chose, but I understand they are trying to cater to a more casual audience. Great work IPL, the NASL is now irrelevant to me.
On April 22 2011 10:27 kagemucha wrote: IGN: 10,420 viewers NASL: 5938 viewers
Enough said!
Indeed.
I just randomly tuned in at the end of the first Machine/SeleCT game and was absolutely blown away by the quality of the overlay as well as the graphics and stuff that showed up at the end. I knew the SCR/WellPlayed guys would be good, but this just blows me away! I'm so excited for this!
I gotta admit, the prize pool doesn't seem to have much of an effect on entertainment. So far the IPL has been more entertaining than any of the NASL I've seen.
the production is amazing, but they are casting from replays and not live games which helps with quality, the casts are recorded prolly with fraps by the casters and then the production team put on all the sexy gfx.
The NASL has live casters in a studio, players playing live and more analysis, its a completely different ball game production wise to film live in a studio, you simply can't compare the two. IPL is amazing yes, but they aren't working on the same scale as NASL.
IGN is the Dreamhack of starleagues...as soon as they get more top-caliber players in the mix, it'll be absolutely huge. I can't wait till the ro8 and onward when the competition really starts getting fierce.
On April 22 2011 10:27 AimForTheBushes wrote: Think alot of you guys are getting blinded by the superior production. All these game today are lopsided and fairly uninteresting matchups. (Aagh? Machine? Vibe?) Can't really get excited for those guys, and it just feels like I'm watching a cast of random games on youtube, only I get pretty graphics in between games. Still better than NASL for me today though, seeing as how I can't even get that stream for some reason.
i agree. the fancy graphics and stuff are just a novelty. people tend to focus too much on "production value" and "casters" while not enough people focus on the damn good players that produce great games.
On April 22 2011 10:27 redviper wrote: How is their stream so good through justin.tv and NASL stream was having so much trouble also on justin.tv?
Some have professional ressources / staff, some don't.
nope if u read the ign thread all this is made by a website called wellplayed.org and it is all produced by VOLUNTEERS with little to zero experience in this kind of stuff. They are firsties just like nasl.
They aren't "firsties", they've had a bit more experience, additionally the folks at IGN do obviously have additional resources.
Obviously the IPL is much better produced than the NASL, but let's not make it seem as though the people at the NASL are just entirely incompetent while the people running the IPL are equally inexperienced but competent.
The IPL has a few hard working people with some experience and access to many resources.
The only trouble with the league is that the casting is freaking terrible. For me it was just unwatchable, I was able to stand like 5 minutes of Wheat and 30 seconds of TotalBiscuit. They either need to get better casters (probably not the best solution) or get dual casters.
On April 22 2011 10:29 Doodsmack wrote: Also, it seems like some people in here don't want NASL to succeed. It's not about one over the other, guys.
It's not about not wanting NASL to succeed. Everyone wants great matches, features and competition for the hobby that we all enjoy. NASL so far has fell very short of the hype that was around it and what a lot of people were hoping for and expecting.
IGN in comparison, for production values and other associated markers, is incredibly above the quality that NASL has put out so far. It just seems like the disparity is great between that which is put out by amateurs trying to be professional, and those that have put in a great deal of time and chose intelligent avenues to go down.
On April 22 2011 10:29 Doodsmack wrote: Also, it seems like some people in here don't want NASL to succeed. It's not about one over the other, guys.
It's not about not wanting NASL to succeed. Everyone wants great matches, features and competition for the hobby that we all enjoy. NASL so far has fell very short of the hype that was around it and what a lot of people were hoping for and expecting.
IGN in comparison, for production values and other associated markers, is incredibly above the quality that NASL has put out so far. It just seems like the disparity is great between that which is put out by amateurs trying to be professional, and those that have put in a great deal of time and chose intelligent avenues to go down.
You're comparing a game that was recorded a week in advance to live casting.
On April 22 2011 10:29 Doodsmack wrote: Also, it seems like some people in here don't want NASL to succeed. It's not about one over the other, guys.
It's not about not wanting NASL to succeed. Everyone wants great matches, features and competition for the hobby that we all enjoy. NASL so far has fell very short of the hype that was around it and what a lot of people were hoping for and expecting.
IGN in comparison, for production values and other associated markers, is incredibly above the quality that NASL has put out so far. It just seems like the disparity is great between that which is put out by amateurs trying to be professional, and those that have put in a great deal of time and chose intelligent avenues to go down.
You're comparing a game that was recorded a week in advance to live casting.
On April 22 2011 10:29 Doodsmack wrote: Also, it seems like some people in here don't want NASL to succeed. It's not about one over the other, guys.
It's not about not wanting NASL to succeed. Everyone wants great matches, features and competition for the hobby that we all enjoy. NASL so far has fell very short of the hype that was around it and what a lot of people were hoping for and expecting.
IGN in comparison, for production values and other associated markers, is incredibly above the quality that NASL has put out so far. It just seems like the disparity is great between that which is put out by amateurs trying to be professional, and those that have put in a great deal of time and chose intelligent avenues to go down.
You're comparing a game that was recorded a week in advance to live casting.
Hate to break it to you this way, but....NASL is not live.
On April 22 2011 10:35 SlipperySnake wrote: The only trouble with the league is that the casting is freaking terrible. For me it was just unwatchable, I was able to stand like 5 minutes of Wheat and 30 seconds of TotalBiscuit. They either need to get better casters (probably not the best solution) or get dual casters.
I would tune in to a grunting hobbit casting a match before I ever unmute Gretorp.
On April 22 2011 10:29 Doodsmack wrote: Also, it seems like some people in here don't want NASL to succeed. It's not about one over the other, guys.
It's not about not wanting NASL to succeed. Everyone wants great matches, features and competition for the hobby that we all enjoy. NASL so far has fell very short of the hype that was around it and what a lot of people were hoping for and expecting.
IGN in comparison, for production values and other associated markers, is incredibly above the quality that NASL has put out so far. It just seems like the disparity is great between that which is put out by amateurs trying to be professional, and those that have put in a great deal of time and chose intelligent avenues to go down.
You're comparing a game that was recorded a week in advance to live casting.
Hate to break it to you this way, but....NASL is not live.
Right, but the casting is recorded while the game is happening, and it's aired only a couple hours later, am I right?
I don't want to admit it, but I don't particularly like djwheat as a commentator--for some reason, his voice sounds really, really aggravating to me. I agree that he is an awesome caster, hands down--he knows his stuff, keeps the game interesting, and has very good analysis. However, his voice just ruins it for me haha ...it just sounds like he has a runny nose or something, and it almost gives me a headache.
Nonetheless, the tournament is still amazing! I just watch on mute~ So awesome!
This is how it's done. I like how they're not trying to sell us anything like everyone else. Free HD, flawless stream, bar setting production, mmmmm. Commercials is the way to go to be successful.
On April 22 2011 10:32 emythrel wrote: the production is amazing, but they are casting from replays and not live games which helps with quality, the casts are recorded prolly with fraps by the casters and then the production team put on all the sexy gfx.
The NASL has live casters in a studio, players playing live and more analysis, its a completely different ball game production wise to film live in a studio, you simply can't compare the two. IPL is amazing yes, but they aren't working on the same scale as NASL.
Yeah, but because of the way NASL is run, none of those things were really necessary. Casting from live games is cool, but if it's online then does it really make a difference that it's not a live-cast of a replay? The format is basically the same, only they've tightened their time frame at the NASL and given themselves less production and wiggle room. It's still an online tournament, it's still not streamed live, they could literally just be casting from replays and give themselves an additional buffer and nothing would change on the viewer end except they'd have more time to polish their production.
Right now, the NASL has the potential for better games, but the IPL undoubtedly has the better quality production.
I wish the IPL had a strong casting duo though, I am just not a fan of single casting.
On April 22 2011 10:29 Doodsmack wrote: Also, it seems like some people in here don't want NASL to succeed. It's not about one over the other, guys.
It's not about not wanting NASL to succeed. Everyone wants great matches, features and competition for the hobby that we all enjoy. NASL so far has fell very short of the hype that was around it and what a lot of people were hoping for and expecting.
IGN in comparison, for production values and other associated markers, is incredibly above the quality that NASL has put out so far. It just seems like the disparity is great between that which is put out by amateurs trying to be professional, and those that have put in a great deal of time and chose intelligent avenues to go down.
That is true, but the thing is, IGN isn't playing these games day by day, IIRC, these games were done 1/2 weeks ago so they had quite a lot of time to prepare... Don't think it is quite fair to compare the production value because NASL only has a day or two to get everything ready for the next show...
On April 22 2011 10:27 AimForTheBushes wrote: Think alot of you guys are getting blinded by the superior production. All these game today are lopsided and fairly uninteresting matchups. (Aagh? Machine? Vibe?) Can't really get excited for those guys, and it just feels like I'm watching a cast of random games on youtube, only I get pretty graphics in between games. Still better than NASL for me today though, seeing as how I can't even get that stream for some reason.
On April 22 2011 10:29 Doodsmack wrote: Also, it seems like some people in here don't want NASL to succeed. It's not about one over the other, guys.
When they're on at the same time, and I didn't pay $25 for the NASL VODs, then yes, it is one over the other. And right now, for me, IGN is winning.
I just really have to commend them for putting on such a quality program, absolutely free. What true ballers.
It's "one over the other" in the sense that you can't watch both at the same time. That's obvious. But should we ignore NASL and focus on IGN completely?
On April 22 2011 10:29 Doodsmack wrote: Also, it seems like some people in here don't want NASL to succeed. It's not about one over the other, guys.
It's not about not wanting NASL to succeed. Everyone wants great matches, features and competition for the hobby that we all enjoy. NASL so far has fell very short of the hype that was around it and what a lot of people were hoping for and expecting.
IGN in comparison, for production values and other associated markers, is incredibly above the quality that NASL has put out so far. It just seems like the disparity is great between that which is put out by amateurs trying to be professional, and those that have put in a great deal of time and chose intelligent avenues to go down.
That is true, but the thing is, IGN isn't playing these games day by day, IIRC, these games were done 1/2 weeks ago so they had quite a lot of time to prepare... Don't think it is quite fair to compare the production value because NASL only has a day or two to get everything ready for the next show...
Yeah, but once again... WHY?
If they had recorded the first set a week in advance, they could have had a week buffer for each set at the NASL, they could have live-casted from replays even and no one would have noticed anything on the viewer end. They would just have had more time to polish and improve their quality.
If you're not doing an actual in person, live tournament... then why does any of that shit matter?
I am impressed so far, which doesn't happen very often with anything Sc2 has done. Probably because my expectations weren't very high, but I have to give credit where it's due.
On April 22 2011 10:29 Doodsmack wrote: Also, it seems like some people in here don't want NASL to succeed. It's not about one over the other, guys.
It's not about not wanting NASL to succeed. Everyone wants great matches, features and competition for the hobby that we all enjoy. NASL so far has fell very short of the hype that was around it and what a lot of people were hoping for and expecting.
IGN in comparison, for production values and other associated markers, is incredibly above the quality that NASL has put out so far. It just seems like the disparity is great between that which is put out by amateurs trying to be professional, and those that have put in a great deal of time and chose intelligent avenues to go down.
That is true, but the thing is, IGN isn't playing these games day by day, IIRC, these games were done 1/2 weeks ago so they had quite a lot of time to prepare... Don't think it is quite fair to compare the production value because NASL only has a day or two to get everything ready for the next show...
Yeah, but once again... WHY?
If they had recorded the first set a week in advance, they could have had a week buffer for each set at the NASL, they could have live-casted from replays even and no one would have noticed anything on the viewer end. They would just have had more time to polish and improve their quality.
If you're not doing an actual in person, live tournament... then why does any of that shit matter?
The community complained enough that NASL wasn't going to be live...
Totalbiscuit online. I just had a nerdgasm. I advise anyone not watching this stream to tune in and have their eyes and ears glued as it's pretty awesome. I'm glad a larger tournament is featuring TB as a caster. :D
Actually supersurprised in a good way, only thing I'd knitpick is the solo casters (to be honest Tasteless is the only one who can do that fairly well) :D
On April 22 2011 10:29 Doodsmack wrote: Also, it seems like some people in here don't want NASL to succeed. It's not about one over the other, guys.
It's not about not wanting NASL to succeed. Everyone wants great matches, features and competition for the hobby that we all enjoy. NASL so far has fell very short of the hype that was around it and what a lot of people were hoping for and expecting.
IGN in comparison, for production values and other associated markers, is incredibly above the quality that NASL has put out so far. It just seems like the disparity is great between that which is put out by amateurs trying to be professional, and those that have put in a great deal of time and chose intelligent avenues to go down.
You're comparing a game that was recorded a week in advance to live casting.
Hate to break it to you this way, but....NASL is not live.
Right, but the casting is recorded while the game is happening, and it's aired only a couple hours later, am I right?
right but instead of a couple hours it is now a few days.
I'll also say it's not "one or the other" for sure though.
Some guy on the tournaments thread put it best when he said something to the effect that IGN Pro League is provided everything he expected out of the NASL and more
On April 22 2011 10:45 stevarius wrote: Totalbiscuit online. I just had a nerdgasm. I advise anyone not watching this stream to tune in and have their eyes and ears glued as it's pretty awesome. I'm glad a larger tournament is featuring TB as a caster. :D
total opposite opinion from me =( his voice sounds really fake to me and I know he has a lot of fans but his style is not for me.
Can't even fathom why some people would choose one or the other...I just watch which ever has the better games going on. i.e Watching IGN's Stalife vs Kiwikaki then moved onto NASL to watch Whitera vs Sjow, then I'm going to switch back and watch the remaining Idra vs Fenix followed by Aghs vs Catz + Mini vs Vibe
So many good games to choose from, if you focus on just one league then it is your loss
On April 22 2011 10:29 Doodsmack wrote: Also, it seems like some people in here don't want NASL to succeed. It's not about one over the other, guys.
It's not about not wanting NASL to succeed. Everyone wants great matches, features and competition for the hobby that we all enjoy. NASL so far has fell very short of the hype that was around it and what a lot of people were hoping for and expecting.
IGN in comparison, for production values and other associated markers, is incredibly above the quality that NASL has put out so far. It just seems like the disparity is great between that which is put out by amateurs trying to be professional, and those that have put in a great deal of time and chose intelligent avenues to go down.
That is true, but the thing is, IGN isn't playing these games day by day, IIRC, these games were done 1/2 weeks ago so they had quite a lot of time to prepare... Don't think it is quite fair to compare the production value because NASL only has a day or two to get everything ready for the next show...
Honestly, this may be a little harsh, but does it really matter? What matters is what is more enjoyable and more succesfull. If NASL chose a system they cant handle and would be more sucessful with another system, it's their fault, and if they would attract more viewers as a smaller league, perhaps they shouldn't have tried to grow that big that fast. Still, they may fix a lot of things and stop looking this bad, so it may be too soon to say it was a mistake.
I am very impressed with the production. The audio is pretty good, and the animations and the stats at the end are very neat. However, I dislike the single caster, as I think having two casters is more entertaining
On April 22 2011 10:29 Doodsmack wrote: Also, it seems like some people in here don't want NASL to succeed. It's not about one over the other, guys.
It's not about not wanting NASL to succeed. Everyone wants great matches, features and competition for the hobby that we all enjoy. NASL so far has fell very short of the hype that was around it and what a lot of people were hoping for and expecting.
IGN in comparison, for production values and other associated markers, is incredibly above the quality that NASL has put out so far. It just seems like the disparity is great between that which is put out by amateurs trying to be professional, and those that have put in a great deal of time and chose intelligent avenues to go down.
That is true, but the thing is, IGN isn't playing these games day by day, IIRC, these games were done 1/2 weeks ago so they had quite a lot of time to prepare... Don't think it is quite fair to compare the production value because NASL only has a day or two to get everything ready for the next show...
Honestly, this may be a little harsh, but does it really matter? What matters is what is more enjoyable and more succesfull. If NASL chose a system they cant handle and would be more sucessful with another system, it's their fault, and if they would attract more viewers as a smaller league, perhaps they shouldn't have tried to grow that big that fast. Still, they may fix a lot of things and stop looking this bad, so it may be too soon to say it was a mistake.
This. To the viewer, IPL blows NASL out of the water.
On April 22 2011 10:29 Doodsmack wrote: Also, it seems like some people in here don't want NASL to succeed. It's not about one over the other, guys.
It's not about not wanting NASL to succeed. Everyone wants great matches, features and competition for the hobby that we all enjoy. NASL so far has fell very short of the hype that was around it and what a lot of people were hoping for and expecting.
IGN in comparison, for production values and other associated markers, is incredibly above the quality that NASL has put out so far. It just seems like the disparity is great between that which is put out by amateurs trying to be professional, and those that have put in a great deal of time and chose intelligent avenues to go down.
That is true, but the thing is, IGN isn't playing these games day by day, IIRC, these games were done 1/2 weeks ago so they had quite a lot of time to prepare... Don't think it is quite fair to compare the production value because NASL only has a day or two to get everything ready for the next show...
Yeah, but once again... WHY?
If they had recorded the first set a week in advance, they could have had a week buffer for each set at the NASL, they could have live-casted from replays even and no one would have noticed anything on the viewer end. They would just have had more time to polish and improve their quality.
If you're not doing an actual in person, live tournament... then why does any of that shit matter?
The community complained enough that NASL wasn't going to be live...
Yeah, but when you're not going to be live, then all the other shit doesn't matter anyways so you might as well discard all of that as well.
If they were going to be completely live, I would understand.
Even then, I'd sort of be a little confused as to what the point was if it's not an in-person tournament.
As it stands, them live-casting... live-games make no difference, they could be casting replays for all it matters...
On April 22 2011 10:44 Torte de Lini wrote: Whoa, the "win" animation, backdrop results page, etc. is a very nice touch. Rotating casters is interesting too!
Oh! They rotated the casters!!
Shweet. I like NASL and IPL equally, but the latter is definitely growing on me.
NASL is terrible compared to this. I generally hate Brittish accents but this guy is already better than the casters in the NASL. AND stardard quality free stream does not look like hell.
Of course I wasn't really expecting much in terms of quality of games, considering this is their first season and the players are mostly invites. But still Select's games were pretty good, since I'm a Select fan myself.
But yeah, they need to get more color commentators (analysts)... Day9 maybe. Wheat on his own is pretty bad actually and TB is kind of annoying, but again with a pair it could be pretty alright.
On April 22 2011 10:47 Dommk wrote: Can't even fathom why some people would choose one or the other...I just watch which ever has the better games going on. i.e Watching IGN's Stalife vs Kiwikaki then moved onto NASL to watch Whitera vs Sjow, then I'm going to switch back and watch the remaining Idra vs Fenix followed by Aghs vs Catz + Mini vs Vibe
So many good games to choose from, if you focus on just one league then it is your loss
for the casual gamers it isnt even about the players. they want to complain about graphics or casters.
IGN pro league actually IS that good it justifies a thread rubbing it in. The production and casting have been absolute top notch so far. Haven't heard DjWheat solo cast for quite some time, but he's doing a great job at it. I mean, dual casters are almost always preferable in my book but Wheat shows he can shoulder it all on his own. Solo casting is something TotalBiscuit does more often than not so he's obviously incredibly comfortable with it and it shows. It's delicious.
Aside from the results getting leaked, they're doing a good job. I think they'd benefit from 2 casters per match instead of one but it's not bad at all. Puts NASL to shame.
On April 22 2011 10:29 Doodsmack wrote: Also, it seems like some people in here don't want NASL to succeed. It's not about one over the other, guys.
It's not about not wanting NASL to succeed. Everyone wants great matches, features and competition for the hobby that we all enjoy. NASL so far has fell very short of the hype that was around it and what a lot of people were hoping for and expecting.
IGN in comparison, for production values and other associated markers, is incredibly above the quality that NASL has put out so far. It just seems like the disparity is great between that which is put out by amateurs trying to be professional, and those that have put in a great deal of time and chose intelligent avenues to go down.
That is true, but the thing is, IGN isn't playing these games day by day, IIRC, these games were done 1/2 weeks ago so they had quite a lot of time to prepare... Don't think it is quite fair to compare the production value because NASL only has a day or two to get everything ready for the next show...
Honestly, this may be a little harsh, but does it really matter? What matters is what is more enjoyable and more succesfull. If NASL chose a system they cant handle and would be more sucessful with another system, it's their fault, and if they would attract more viewers as a smaller league, perhaps they shouldn't have tried to grow that big that fast. Still, they may fix a lot of things and stop looking this bad, so it may be too soon to say it was a mistake.
This. To the viewer, IPL blows NASL out of the water.
On April 22 2011 10:44 Torte de Lini wrote: Whoa, the "win" animation, backdrop results page, etc. is a very nice touch. Rotating casters is interesting too!
Oh! They rotated the casters!!
Shweet. I like NASL and IPL equally, but the latter is definitely growing on me.
I wasn't even looking forward to IPL because I didn't know enough about it, so to see how great it is out of the gate I'll be sure to tune in as much as possible.
The single caster doesn't bother me too much, reminds me a lot of how football (soccer if you will) is broadcasted over here, several matches per broadcast with just one commentator doing a what people here like to call "play-by-play" commentary, with maybe a more extensive commentary on finals or more high-profile matches. Especially in the earlier stages of the tournament I'd mostly be watching the matches for light entertainment anyway, and this is a pretty good format for that
For Division 1, 3, 4 and 5 of the NASL, I'll probably tune in for select matches and just look up the results for others, like I said, the NASL has the potential for some really great games.
Also, I can easily just check out the VODs for the IPL at any time for free.
Honestly I can't take the IPL seriously considering they updated the whole bracket on their website with the full results of the tournaments, so saying that their production values are great is kinda moot since so many people know who won the whole thing because of their massive screwup. Whereas with the nasl thats kinda impossible so its more exciting...
Very nice from the IPL, but people trash talking the NASL are seriously getting out of proportion... not even GOM has this kind of production, and it's simple enough why: Rupert Murdoch. If you can't really see the difference that was to be expected between a Rupert Murdoch owned company and seven amateur esports fans, no matter how you try to spin it, what you're saying is that you want the NASL to fail. Unless what you're trying to say is that you want all media billionaires in the world to get into esports. In that case, I'm all ears as to how you're going to do it.
Still, we should keep being nice to the IPL so they spoil us more, that way even GOM may fear going down in the pecking order of the community, 'cause really, half of what keeps GOM up there is Tastosis
Edit: ^^^ You know, some people don't want to know what you just said...
Impressive debut day for the IPL indeed, i really like the win animation and end game stats screen. 2 casters would be ideal but wheat and TB are doing a good job soloing it so far.
On April 22 2011 10:29 Doodsmack wrote: Also, it seems like some people in here don't want NASL to succeed. It's not about one over the other, guys.
It's not about not wanting NASL to succeed. Everyone wants great matches, features and competition for the hobby that we all enjoy. NASL so far has fell very short of the hype that was around it and what a lot of people were hoping for and expecting.
IGN in comparison, for production values and other associated markers, is incredibly above the quality that NASL has put out so far. It just seems like the disparity is great between that which is put out by amateurs trying to be professional, and those that have put in a great deal of time and chose intelligent avenues to go down.
That is true, but the thing is, IGN isn't playing these games day by day, IIRC, these games were done 1/2 weeks ago so they had quite a lot of time to prepare... Don't think it is quite fair to compare the production value because NASL only has a day or two to get everything ready for the next show...
Honestly, this may be a little harsh, but does it really matter? What matters is what is more enjoyable and more succesfull. If NASL chose a system they cant handle and would be more sucessful with another system, it's their fault, and if they would attract more viewers as a smaller league, perhaps they shouldn't have tried to grow that big that fast. Still, they may fix a lot of things and stop looking this bad, so it may be too soon to say it was a mistake.
This. To the viewer, IPL blows NASL out of the water.
blows NASL out of the water? maybe to you..
it got turned off as soon as TB came on..
Heh i had to mute him so i could watch idra but not rage cause of terrible casting.
On April 22 2011 10:29 Doodsmack wrote: Also, it seems like some people in here don't want NASL to succeed. It's not about one over the other, guys.
It's not about not wanting NASL to succeed. Everyone wants great matches, features and competition for the hobby that we all enjoy. NASL so far has fell very short of the hype that was around it and what a lot of people were hoping for and expecting.
IGN in comparison, for production values and other associated markers, is incredibly above the quality that NASL has put out so far. It just seems like the disparity is great between that which is put out by amateurs trying to be professional, and those that have put in a great deal of time and chose intelligent avenues to go down.
That is true, but the thing is, IGN isn't playing these games day by day, IIRC, these games were done 1/2 weeks ago so they had quite a lot of time to prepare... Don't think it is quite fair to compare the production value because NASL only has a day or two to get everything ready for the next show...
Honestly, this may be a little harsh, but does it really matter? What matters is what is more enjoyable and more succesfull. If NASL chose a system they cant handle and would be more sucessful with another system, it's their fault, and if they would attract more viewers as a smaller league, perhaps they shouldn't have tried to grow that big that fast. Still, they may fix a lot of things and stop looking this bad, so it may be too soon to say it was a mistake.
This. To the viewer, IPL blows NASL out of the water.
blows NASL out of the water? maybe to you..
it got turned off as soon as TB came on..
Take a look at the viewer count. TB is loved by many whether he appeals to you personally or not. Wheat is also a great caster and the IPL is so far amazing and noone can deny that it's making the NASL league look terrible especially considering they're trying to charge $25 for their service.
what would be great if these two leagues worked with each other like MBC Game and OGN to create a really great system with high quality and great games
Production is IGN quality. What would you expect. Beautifully done. The problem is that Total biscuit needs someone substantive with him. It doesn't even have to be a player. Someone of Diggity's caliber would add a lot to the cast. This is a non trivial fault, but overall another great league.
On April 22 2011 10:29 Doodsmack wrote: Also, it seems like some people in here don't want NASL to succeed. It's not about one over the other, guys.
It's not about not wanting NASL to succeed. Everyone wants great matches, features and competition for the hobby that we all enjoy. NASL so far has fell very short of the hype that was around it and what a lot of people were hoping for and expecting.
IGN in comparison, for production values and other associated markers, is incredibly above the quality that NASL has put out so far. It just seems like the disparity is great between that which is put out by amateurs trying to be professional, and those that have put in a great deal of time and chose intelligent avenues to go down.
That is true, but the thing is, IGN isn't playing these games day by day, IIRC, these games were done 1/2 weeks ago so they had quite a lot of time to prepare... Don't think it is quite fair to compare the production value because NASL only has a day or two to get everything ready for the next show...
Honestly, this may be a little harsh, but does it really matter? What matters is what is more enjoyable and more succesfull. If NASL chose a system they cant handle and would be more sucessful with another system, it's their fault, and if they would attract more viewers as a smaller league, perhaps they shouldn't have tried to grow that big that fast. Still, they may fix a lot of things and stop looking this bad, so it may be too soon to say it was a mistake.
This. To the viewer, IPL blows NASL out of the water.
blows NASL out of the water? maybe to you..
it got turned off as soon as TB came on..
Heh i had to mute him so i could watch idra but not rage cause of terrible casting.
Really? I was the opposite lol >< Muted djwheat and instantly unmuted once I realized that they rotated the casters.
What do you find bad about totalbiscuit? Edit: oh never mind he has less experience with SC I think
Oh snap, the animations they have look like street fighter (the win animation ) and general awesomeness.
They should think about changing the name though. IGN Cheese League. Seems more appropriate. Good production though. Still going to watch NASL as well.
These casters are for the casual crowd. Sorry to say DJWheat and Totalbiscuit don't really add anything to the understanding of the game, they just cast whatever they see which isn't anything we already don't know (since we have eyes). They need to be combined with analytical casters (painuser) to make a good cast. All those that say the casting is good... I think what they mean is that their voices are good, have nice flow. but to me the casting is really sub par, NASL has much more knowledgeable casters.
On April 22 2011 10:55 Mephiztopheles1 wrote: Very nice from the IPL, but people trash talking the NASL are seriously getting out of proportion... not even GOM has this kind of production, and it's simple enough why: Rupert Murdoch. If you can't really see the difference that was to be expected between a Rupert Murdoch owned company and seven amateur esports fans, no matter how you try to spin it, what you're saying is that you want the NASL to fail. Unless what you're trying to say is that you want all media billionaires in the world to get into esports. In that case, I'm all ears as to how you're going to do it.
Still, we should keep being nice to the IPL so they spoil us more, that way even GOM may fear going down in the pecking order of the community, 'cause really, half of what keeps GOM up there is Tastosis
I would still consider the GSL to have superior quality in addition to the added excitement of being a live LAN tournament, but your point is fair.
GSL is still going to be the top dog though until someone can come up with a LAN tournament with a fantastic top player list and the production quality of the IPL.
The production quality is superb. Going with caricatures was a great idea, looks clean and simple but professional. The solo caster isn't an issue considering TB's style of being a stream of verbal vomit for the entire duration of the match. It'd be weird if his flow was blown constantly. That being said I'm watching the show on mute because TB doesn't have a single thing to say that's of value if you're beyond platinum.
On April 22 2011 10:29 Doodsmack wrote: Also, it seems like some people in here don't want NASL to succeed. It's not about one over the other, guys.
It's not about not wanting NASL to succeed. Everyone wants great matches, features and competition for the hobby that we all enjoy. NASL so far has fell very short of the hype that was around it and what a lot of people were hoping for and expecting.
IGN in comparison, for production values and other associated markers, is incredibly above the quality that NASL has put out so far. It just seems like the disparity is great between that which is put out by amateurs trying to be professional, and those that have put in a great deal of time and chose intelligent avenues to go down.
That is true, but the thing is, IGN isn't playing these games day by day, IIRC, these games were done 1/2 weeks ago so they had quite a lot of time to prepare... Don't think it is quite fair to compare the production value because NASL only has a day or two to get everything ready for the next show...
Honestly, this may be a little harsh, but does it really matter? What matters is what is more enjoyable and more succesfull. If NASL chose a system they cant handle and would be more sucessful with another system, it's their fault, and if they would attract more viewers as a smaller league, perhaps they shouldn't have tried to grow that big that fast. Still, they may fix a lot of things and stop looking this bad, so it may be too soon to say it was a mistake.
This. To the viewer, IPL blows NASL out of the water.
blows NASL out of the water? maybe to you..
it got turned off as soon as TB came on..
Casters aside... IGN looks like a broadcast and a tournament which was carefully planned, and with great effort put into it. It's like experienced, professional people did it.
NASL looks like it was planned and put together by a bunch of amateurs and everything about it was just sloppy.
Yeah sure, NASL's got the bigger prize pool and better players. But you gotta remember that this is IGN's first season which they've already said is just a preview for what's to come. NASL didn't bother with this and instead tried to get themselves into more than what they could handle.
It's pretty clear who planned better. Based on sheer potential alone, IGN looks like it has more potential to do well than NASL. Imagine next season when they'll have their qualification systems in place and more quality players are in.
Take a look at the viewer count. TB is loved by many whether he appeals to you personally or not. Wheat is also a great caster and the IPL is so far amazing and noone can deny that it's making the NASL league terrible especially considering they're trying to charge $25 for their service.
Keep in mind that IGN is able to afford all this free service because they've got a huuuuge company backing the whole thing. NASL's funding isn't completely clear but it's obvious they don't have a huge name like IGN backing them, and hence really can't afford the same as the IPL, at least not for the same price.
Notwithstanding that NASL has its issues at the moment, but there's been enough debate about those I'd say
If IPL can manage to get a lineup like that of NASL, only then I feel it can compete. Production quality is important, super important, but we need to be honest its all about the games and the competition.
You guys wanna criticize TB and DJ Wheat's game knowledge, but then you turn around and want "e-sports to grow". You do realize that e-sports won't grow if every cast is jam packed with a bunch of technical stuff or tips to improve your play? This style without the technical stuff is the only way you are going to ever appeal to a broader audience... period. SC2 is exclusive enough as it is
IPL is great quality. The only gripe I have is the quality of the games played aren't quite there, but I'm sure that will improve with following seasons as more and better players get into the league through qualifiers.
The other criticism I have is sole commentators are kinda dumb. That works for youtube channels, but for tournaments and leagues of this caliber, dual commentating adds more excitement and analysis to the game.
Other than that, everything else is amazing. Stream quality is flawless. I love the post-game summaries and the general production value of it all. It seems like something you could very likely see on TV. Overall I'm very impressed and would definitely pay for future leagues if they keep this up and/or improve it.
I don't know what you guys are complaining about, but I think TB is awesome at what he does - just cast the game. Not every caster has to be Professor Analyst for it to work.
After trying really, really, really hard to find something critical to say about the IPL, I have come up with the following (if you can even call it a criticism):
I would love if they did a 2-man commentary team with one good play-by-play caster (e.g. TB or Wheat) and one analytical caster (e.g. Day9, Artosis, iNcontroL, etc. – pay them whatever they ask, it'd be worth it) rather than the somewhat monotonous solo casting.
On April 22 2011 10:29 Doodsmack wrote: Also, it seems like some people in here don't want NASL to succeed. It's not about one over the other, guys.
It's not about not wanting NASL to succeed. Everyone wants great matches, features and competition for the hobby that we all enjoy. NASL so far has fell very short of the hype that was around it and what a lot of people were hoping for and expecting.
IGN in comparison, for production values and other associated markers, is incredibly above the quality that NASL has put out so far. It just seems like the disparity is great between that which is put out by amateurs trying to be professional, and those that have put in a great deal of time and chose intelligent avenues to go down.
That is true, but the thing is, IGN isn't playing these games day by day, IIRC, these games were done 1/2 weeks ago so they had quite a lot of time to prepare... Don't think it is quite fair to compare the production value because NASL only has a day or two to get everything ready for the next show...
Honestly, this may be a little harsh, but does it really matter? What matters is what is more enjoyable and more succesfull. If NASL chose a system they cant handle and would be more sucessful with another system, it's their fault, and if they would attract more viewers as a smaller league, perhaps they shouldn't have tried to grow that big that fast. Still, they may fix a lot of things and stop looking this bad, so it may be too soon to say it was a mistake.
This. To the viewer, IPL blows NASL out of the water.
blows NASL out of the water? maybe to you..
it got turned off as soon as TB came on..
Heh i had to mute him so i could watch idra but not rage cause of terrible casting.
Really? I was the opposite lol >< Muted djwheat and instantly unmuted once I realized that they rotated the casters.
What do you find bad about totalbiscuit? Edit: oh never mind he has less experience with SC I think
Oh snap, the animations they have look like street fighter (the win animation ) and general awesomeness.
On April 22 2011 11:00 Jayrod wrote: You guys wanna criticize TB and DJ Wheat's game knowledge, but then you turn around and want "e-sports to grow". You do realize that e-sports won't grow if every cast is jam packed with a bunch of technical stuff or tips to improve your play? This style without the technical stuff is the only way you are going to ever appeal to a broader audience... period. SC2 is exclusive enough as it is
That's why you have a pair of casters, one who leads in analysis and one who leads in introductory information and play-by-play.
If you have a solely casual oriented caster, you're likely to put off the hardcore fans.
If you have a solely analytical caster you're likely to not be able to rake in newer casual audiences.
It's about balance.
Tastosis works, Day9 and DJWheat made a good pair too, it's about strong duos who can balance.
IPL is simply amazing. As it's been said before - production value, stream quality, audio quality, etc... Not a big fan of TotalBiscuit but not a hater either, and I think it was a brilliant idea to rotate the casters. 10/10
The production quality is amazing, but in the end I turned it off and switched back to NASL. I just couldn't stand the casting. NASL has better players and prize pool, and in my opinion a better tournament format and casters (though they're far from perfect). IGN has a professional organization and production crew that actually knows what it's doing. Imagine what these people could do if they merged instead of trying to compete with each other.... Obviously nothing that doesn't require the players to all move to the same city and show up in person is going to reach the level of GSL, but they could actually create a really high-quality tournament. Instead, we have two tournaments that are extremely impressive in some ways and extremely lacking in others.
On April 22 2011 10:29 Doodsmack wrote: Also, it seems like some people in here don't want NASL to succeed. It's not about one over the other, guys.
It's not about not wanting NASL to succeed. Everyone wants great matches, features and competition for the hobby that we all enjoy. NASL so far has fell very short of the hype that was around it and what a lot of people were hoping for and expecting.
IGN in comparison, for production values and other associated markers, is incredibly above the quality that NASL has put out so far. It just seems like the disparity is great between that which is put out by amateurs trying to be professional, and those that have put in a great deal of time and chose intelligent avenues to go down.
That is true, but the thing is, IGN isn't playing these games day by day, IIRC, these games were done 1/2 weeks ago so they had quite a lot of time to prepare... Don't think it is quite fair to compare the production value because NASL only has a day or two to get everything ready for the next show...
Honestly, this may be a little harsh, but does it really matter? What matters is what is more enjoyable and more succesfull. If NASL chose a system they cant handle and would be more sucessful with another system, it's their fault, and if they would attract more viewers as a smaller league, perhaps they shouldn't have tried to grow that big that fast. Still, they may fix a lot of things and stop looking this bad, so it may be too soon to say it was a mistake.
This. To the viewer, IPL blows NASL out of the water.
blows NASL out of the water? maybe to you..
it got turned off as soon as TB came on..
Heh i had to mute him so i could watch idra but not rage cause of terrible casting.
Really? I was the opposite lol >< Muted djwheat and instantly unmuted once I realized that they rotated the casters.
What do you find bad about totalbiscuit? Edit: oh never mind he has less experience with SC I think
Oh snap, the animations they have look like street fighter (the win animation ) and general awesomeness.
Just dont like his personality honestly.
D'aww
I definitely think that the experience could be improved by having two commentators on at the same time. TB is a pretty good play-by-play announcer, but a color commentator to go with him would make IPL golden for me.
Good casting, good quality, no stream issues, cool score display, the minimap-thing along with portraits etc. between games is great and overall the production value is just awesome. Looking forward to the start of the real IGN seasons.
@Jayrod, you're 100% correct it's true that these play-by-play casters are much more accessible for the overwhelming majority of people, ESPECIALLY people who are not well versed in SC2. But for those of us who are it's a little painful...then again i'm sure that's how any sport + casters are
Take a look at the viewer count. TB is loved by many whether he appeals to you personally or not. Wheat is also a great caster and the IPL is so far amazing and noone can deny that it's making the NASL league terrible especially considering they're trying to charge $25 for their service.
Keep in mind that IGN is able to afford all this free service because they've got a huuuuge company backing the whole thing. NASL's funding isn't completely clear but it's obvious they don't have a huge name like IGN backing them, and hence really can't afford the same as the IPL, at least not for the same price.
Notwithstanding that NASL has its issues at the moment, but there's been enough debate about those I'd say
All NASL needs is the editor to change the encoding. That would greatly help reduce the lag on vods, the live stream and fix the audio problems in one fell swoop.
On April 22 2011 10:55 Mephiztopheles1 wrote: Very nice from the IPL, but people trash talking the NASL are seriously getting out of proportion... not even GOM has this kind of production, and it's simple enough why: Rupert Murdoch. If you can't really see the difference that was to be expected between a Rupert Murdoch owned company and seven amateur esports fans, no matter how you try to spin it, what you're saying is that you want the NASL to fail. Unless what you're trying to say is that you want all media billionaires in the world to get into esports. In that case, I'm all ears as to how you're going to do it.
Still, we should keep being nice to the IPL so they spoil us more, that way even GOM may fear going down in the pecking order of the community, 'cause really, half of what keeps GOM up there is Tastosis
Edit: ^^^ You know, some people don't want to know what you just said...
As has been said several times, this event was produced by the team at WellPlayed.org, which is not composed of employees of IGN. We are an entirely separate group.
On April 22 2011 11:08 Voltaire wrote: Even IGN isn't perfect, they just played the Kiwikaki vs Stalife voiceover with Rootcatz vs LGagh on the screen.
first mistake of the night 5 games in? not bad imo.
On April 22 2011 11:08 Voltaire wrote: Even IGN isn't perfect, they just played the Kiwikaki vs Stalife voiceover with Rootcatz vs LGagh on the screen.
Small things like that happen to everybody. No big deal, not even worth mentioning.
On April 22 2011 10:29 Doodsmack wrote: Also, it seems like some people in here don't want NASL to succeed. It's not about one over the other, guys.
It's not about not wanting NASL to succeed. Everyone wants great matches, features and competition for the hobby that we all enjoy. NASL so far has fell very short of the hype that was around it and what a lot of people were hoping for and expecting.
IGN in comparison, for production values and other associated markers, is incredibly above the quality that NASL has put out so far. It just seems like the disparity is great between that which is put out by amateurs trying to be professional, and those that have put in a great deal of time and chose intelligent avenues to go down.
That is true, but the thing is, IGN isn't playing these games day by day, IIRC, these games were done 1/2 weeks ago so they had quite a lot of time to prepare... Don't think it is quite fair to compare the production value because NASL only has a day or two to get everything ready for the next show...
Honestly, this may be a little harsh, but does it really matter? What matters is what is more enjoyable and more succesfull. If NASL chose a system they cant handle and would be more sucessful with another system, it's their fault, and if they would attract more viewers as a smaller league, perhaps they shouldn't have tried to grow that big that fast. Still, they may fix a lot of things and stop looking this bad, so it may be too soon to say it was a mistake.
This. To the viewer, IPL blows NASL out of the water.
blows NASL out of the water? maybe to you..
it got turned off as soon as TB came on..
Take a look at the viewer count. TB is loved by many whether he appeals to you personally or not. Wheat is also a great caster and the IPL is so far amazing and noone can deny that it's making the NASL league look terrible especially considering they're trying to charge $25 for their service.
Noone can deny its making NASL look terrible? Uh huh.... well..
Firstly, I don't think the viewer count on IGN's first day is indicative of anything.. NASL had more viewers on their first day. But IGN is new an exciting so naturally ppl are going to watch it on the first day.
Secondly, it takes more than some cool transitions and graphics to make a good show for me. Personally, if a game isn't being cast, I'm not watching so I could give two shits what kinds of cool production value they have.
Thirdly, you don't need to pay $25 to watch NASL. You can if you want HD, but I have to watch both streams on <720p otherwise it lags uncontrollably so your point is valid for people who have awesome bandwidth.
Fourthly, solo casters? DJ Wheat? TB? You can keep all that... I mean I love DJ Wheat, but I prefer casters that have high level insight. These guys can only do the play by play.. I don't need that done for me..
My crux is that I care about what happens between when the game starts and the gg. Because of this.. NASL blows IGN out of the water.
That being said.. IGN is looking good -hopefully they continue after this season. Should be good for western esports
On April 22 2011 11:06 jhsu98 wrote: @Jayrod, you're 100% correct it's true that these play-by-play casters are much more accessible for the overwhelming majority of people, ESPECIALLY people who are not well versed in SC2. But for those of us who are it's a little painful...then again i'm sure that's how any sport + casters are
I feel like sports casters are generally a balanced pair as I mentioned above but it's important to note that most sports aren't as technical as Starcraft so it's not a huge deal. A good comparison is Poker though, if you take a look at some of the casting from the World Series of Poker, there is a caster who focuses on the players, backgrounds, jokes and another who focuses on the cards, the plays, yada yada...
It's about striking a balance to appease the new audience and the hardcore fans.
Really got to give props to IPL for having such an astoundingly good first go, and just when I was thinking how I couldn't justify paying for leagues outside of GSL with NA leagues having free streams at times that are reasonable. This league however is just the kind of thing that might make me change my mind. Grats to everyone involved on creating such a strong first impression.
I'm really really impressed. I think the quality of stream, the fast games, the production pre and post game and the free vods, it's really impressive. I think this is the perfect setup to try to get casual viewers (Which IGN is probably aiming for as their user-base isn't all sc2) into the scene. Really well done.
They put a lot of time in this for sure. Love the quality of the stream. Not too big a fan of the commentators. But I've never really been a fan of husky or djweat. Still theyre doing quite well. Keep in mind though NASL has about 1 and a half day to make their content while this has been played atleast a week before.
This is awesome. I love the little graphics and the overlay. It's different and makes it a little more upbeat. Reminds me of street fighter and really emphasizes the individuals battling it out! Great casters, no useless talk inbetween, just good games and very straightforward.
I have to admit I was a little bit of a NASL fanboy, but man........ nasl doesn't even come close to this, it exceeds it by leaps and bounds and it's only the first day.
Great job guys, I love (and hate) the amount of SC there is to watch
For all the effort and production quality for this Pro League.is awesome.... the grand prize is a total lump sum of $5000.......
I just want to point out guys, let's not bandwagon on IGN over NASL, these guys are testing the waters with a $5000 event, NASL has committed $400,000 over THREE Seasons. I'd rather watch amazing games over production value any-day, but I'll give it to IGN, they are doing a good job and I'll continue to support them as well.
Wow. This is GSL level quality. The only thing missing is a pro-level dual casting team. I thought they were getting PainUser to do commentary, or am I thinking of something else?
On April 22 2011 10:55 Mephiztopheles1 wrote: Very nice from the IPL, but people trash talking the NASL are seriously getting out of proportion... not even GOM has this kind of production, and it's simple enough why: Rupert Murdoch. If you can't really see the difference that was to be expected between a Rupert Murdoch owned company and seven amateur esports fans, no matter how you try to spin it, what you're saying is that you want the NASL to fail. Unless what you're trying to say is that you want all media billionaires in the world to get into esports. In that case, I'm all ears as to how you're going to do it.
Still, we should keep being nice to the IPL so they spoil us more, that way even GOM may fear going down in the pecking order of the community, 'cause really, half of what keeps GOM up there is Tastosis
Edit: ^^^ You know, some people don't want to know what you just said...
As has been said several times, this event was produced by the team at WellPlayed.org. None of us are paid.
I see. I take back what I said then.
Then that begs the question, you also work with the NASL, what's up with the "humongous" difference in perceived quality?
Thats so true! INSANE production, sick matches, quality, custom artwork.. everything is really nice! Deifnitely one of my favorite tournaments right now! Beats NASL so easily
On April 22 2011 11:06 jhsu98 wrote: @Jayrod, you're 100% correct it's true that these play-by-play casters are much more accessible for the overwhelming majority of people, ESPECIALLY people who are not well versed in SC2. But for those of us who are it's a little painful...then again i'm sure that's how any sport + casters are
I feel like sports casters are generally a balanced pair as I mentioned above but it's important to note that most sports aren't as technical as Starcraft so it's not a huge deal. A good comparison is Poker though, if you take a look at some of the casting from the World Series of Poker, there is a caster who focuses on the players, backgrounds, jokes and another who focuses on the cards, the plays, yada yada...
It's about striking a balance to appease the new audience and the hardcore fans.
Poker is a more apt analogy. Too bad Starcraft happens at an auctioneer's pace so the casting is much harder to tune out. I'm all for IPL the way it is, I still get my "high level" games/analysis/commentary from GSL. And this will greatly help spread the word and hype about eSports in the west.
On April 22 2011 11:15 Baby_Seal wrote: I don't really see how IGN is that much better than NASL? Only problem is the audio right now.
Also, IGN is free now, but I doubt it's going to be free when they start the big Season 2 League.
it is noob friendly but completely ridiculous that they cast from replays that are weeks old. the results from entire season 1 have been leaked which is unacceptable for something that has such great "production quality"
On April 22 2011 11:15 Baby_Seal wrote: I don't really see how IGN is that much better than NASL? Only problem is the audio right now.
Also, IGN is free now, but I doubt it's going to be free when they start the big Season 2 League.
Not really. The frame rate for NASL is pretty awful. Load up both streams and compare it. Sometimes its so choppy you can literally see units teleport across the screen.
On April 22 2011 10:55 Mephiztopheles1 wrote: Very nice from the IPL, but people trash talking the NASL are seriously getting out of proportion... not even GOM has this kind of production, and it's simple enough why: Rupert Murdoch. If you can't really see the difference that was to be expected between a Rupert Murdoch owned company and seven amateur esports fans, no matter how you try to spin it, what you're saying is that you want the NASL to fail. Unless what you're trying to say is that you want all media billionaires in the world to get into esports. In that case, I'm all ears as to how you're going to do it.
Still, we should keep being nice to the IPL so they spoil us more, that way even GOM may fear going down in the pecking order of the community, 'cause really, half of what keeps GOM up there is Tastosis
Edit: ^^^ You know, some people don't want to know what you just said...
As has been said several times, this event was produced by the team at WellPlayed.org. None of us are paid.
I see. I take back what I said then.
Then that begs the question, you also work with the NASL, what's up with the "humongous" difference in perceived quality?
We are partnered with the NASL as their official community, they have their own production team. We are the production team for IPL's broadcast as well as the official community. Sorry if that was unclear!
I think the production, the stream quality, and audio are awesome. The games themselves haven't been the best, but you can't really blame the IPL for players dominating others. I believe their main goal was accessibility for new players and going off this I think the single play-by-play caster is actually the best idea. Really if you have a solo analysis caster or a duo its still just to complex for a new person to sit down and watch. By using ONLY a play-by-play its the ideal situation for new viewers and just by looking at Husky and HD's youtube channels you have the precedent. The analysis might not be there and ideally I personally would like 2 casters, one for analysis and 1 for play-by-play, but I think its excellent so far.
On April 22 2011 10:55 Mephiztopheles1 wrote: Very nice from the IPL, but people trash talking the NASL are seriously getting out of proportion... not even GOM has this kind of production, and it's simple enough why: Rupert Murdoch. If you can't really see the difference that was to be expected between a Rupert Murdoch owned company and seven amateur esports fans, no matter how you try to spin it, what you're saying is that you want the NASL to fail. Unless what you're trying to say is that you want all media billionaires in the world to get into esports. In that case, I'm all ears as to how you're going to do it.
Still, we should keep being nice to the IPL so they spoil us more, that way even GOM may fear going down in the pecking order of the community, 'cause really, half of what keeps GOM up there is Tastosis
Edit: ^^^ You know, some people don't want to know what you just said...
As has been said several times, this event was produced by the team at WellPlayed.org. None of us are paid.
I see. I take back what I said then.
Then that begs the question, you also work with the NASL, what's up with the "humongous" difference in perceived quality?
We are partnered with the NASL as their official community, they have their own production team. We are the production team for IPL's broadcast as well as the official community. Sorry if that was unclear!
You should tell IGN to pay you then! It's the most professional production since GSL.
On April 22 2011 11:23 Amui wrote: sadly I need to watch canucks v blackhawks and play portal 2. I watched 5 min though and apart from casting, stream is almost perfect
having played through portal 2 myself you will enjoy that game more then watching the stream.
love the post game statistics. I know APM isn't everything, but it gives average joes a comparison (seleCT omg). Anyone think Agh's picture kinda looks like Billy Mayes? lol
On April 22 2011 11:25 Bub wrote: I'd be lying if I said I'm not loving this. Way to go IGN!
That. I thought I was just gonna have this up while I do work but every time I scroll through my tabs and see it I get sucked in for 10-15 minutes minimum. Really fantastic work overall, I can only imagine what later seasons will be like.
Interviews with players after victories, a quick 2-3 minute interview couldn't hurt and really helps get invested in a player, gives a little bit of insight to viewers.
IGN Proleague's production quality is absolutely amazing. The stream is incredibly stable and the picture quality is amazing. Easily the highest quality online viewing experience in NA to date. I can't wait to see how this evolves in the future.
On April 22 2011 11:25 Gokey wrote: Loving the IGN stream... Just wish there were more analytical casters, but TotalBiscuit is pretty amazing with his voice
Stick an Artosis in with the TotalBiscuit and you'd get your excellent analysis and your godlike enthusiastic play-by-play. Just find a way to get them in the same country...
I think its pretty cool, and its a great tournament, but I find myself staying tuned in because it seems like its just games- there isnt too much on the line i guess o.o whatever the case, i find myself keep going back to it <3.
On April 22 2011 11:24 quentel wrote: how cool is this post-game stats page?
that minimap they have makes no sence can you tell me anything at all thats going on there?
its cool but it doesn't have a point. oh the game was a lot further gone then what the castor told me it was. it would be a lot better if it actualy told something that wasn't on the stats page that no one really looks at anyway. how many colossi where killed? bases lost? k/d ratio would be fun as well.
pretty but boaring sad to say thats what the IPL is looking to me. was a HUGE fan and would have hyped it up like hell but the gloss wore off for me and I just can't watch it above the nasl at this point
On April 22 2011 10:55 Mephiztopheles1 wrote: Very nice from the IPL, but people trash talking the NASL are seriously getting out of proportion... not even GOM has this kind of production, and it's simple enough why: Rupert Murdoch. If you can't really see the difference that was to be expected between a Rupert Murdoch owned company and seven amateur esports fans, no matter how you try to spin it, what you're saying is that you want the NASL to fail. Unless what you're trying to say is that you want all media billionaires in the world to get into esports. In that case, I'm all ears as to how you're going to do it.
Still, we should keep being nice to the IPL so they spoil us more, that way even GOM may fear going down in the pecking order of the community, 'cause really, half of what keeps GOM up there is Tastosis
Edit: ^^^ You know, some people don't want to know what you just said...
As has been said several times, this event was produced by the team at WellPlayed.org. None of us are paid.
I see. I take back what I said then.
Then that begs the question, you also work with the NASL, what's up with the "humongous" difference in perceived quality?
We are partnered with the NASL as their official community, they have their own production team. We are the production team for IPL's broadcast as well as the official community. Sorry if that was unclear!
can you please help nasl? for the love of god fix their fps and audio....
The production is very nice, reminds me of TSL. I really dislike the solo casting, so I guess I'll just have to wait for PainUser to join the casts to provide some pro level insight and have the stream on mute (also I simply cannot listen to Totalbiscuit, it's just bad).
As far as this talk about NASL vs IGN I don't think people really realize how much more difficult it is to run a 10 week league with 5 matches per day casted live on a 2 day buffer versus the 2 week IGN league with a lot fewer players on a 1week (?) buffer casted from replays. Perhaps this is what the NASL should switch to as it would allow them to add a bunch of features to bring their production up to par. I do absolutely love IGNs production.
IPLs production is amazing. That can't be denied. But I still find myself watching NASL.
The "newbie" friendly approach of the IPL doesn't appeal to me. I don't really like the casting style of TB and wheat. I have nothing against them, or their style in itself. And in fact, I think it's fantastic that IPL is going for a broader audience with their choice of casters. But I prefer a bit more "analysis".
NASL (at the moment) has more of my favourite players too. Whitera, Nada, etc. I just can't pass that up. And there have been some really entertaining sets. It'll be interesting to see who plays eventually plays in IPL.
Either way, I think it's amazing that we now have two good leagues, both of which I hope get better over time. 2011 is gunna be awesme!
The fighting game presentation with the WIN overlay and the stats page are really neat ideas.
On April 22 2011 11:34 Applecakes wrote: IPLs production is amazing. That can't be denied. But I still find myself watching NASL.
The "newbie" friendly approach of the IPL doesn't appeal to me. I don't really like the casting style of TB and wheat. I have nothing against them, or their style in itself. And in fact, I think it's fantastic that IPL is going for a broader audience with their choice of casters. But I prefer a bit more "analysis".
NASL (at the moment) has more of my favourite players too. Whitera, Nada, etc. I just can't pass that up. And there have been some really entertaining sets. It'll be interesting to see who plays eventually plays in IPL.
Either way, I think it's amazing that we now have two good leagues, both of which I hope get better over time.
As I said before, NASL player lineup and prizepool + wellplayed production values would be amazing.
On April 22 2011 11:24 quentel wrote: how cool is this post-game stats page?
that minimap they have makes no sence can you tell me anything at all thats going on there?
its cool but it doesn't have a point. oh the game was a lot further gone then what the castor told me it was. it would be a lot better if it actualy told something that wasn't on the stats page that no one really looks at anyway. how many colossi where killed? bases lost? k/d ratio would be fun as well.
pretty but boaring sad to say thats what the IPL is looking to me. was a HUGE fan and would have hyped it up like hell but the gloss wore off for me and I just can't watch it above the nasl at this point
Uh...the minimap isn't very hard to understand. It just shows where most of the action took place on the map.
And colossi killed and kill death ratios? Seriously? The reason why they have those stats up there is because they're easily accessible. You're basically suggesting someone to watch the whole game and count what units die and keep a little notebook keeping track of the count.
I think theres no doubt that IGN will surpass NASL as the premier NA SC2 league. Kinda glad I didnt buy an NASL HD pass, although I'm sure they'll keep a niche as the only true korean v foreigner league. If this is there bare minimum, I'm pumped to see what IGN can do in season 2.
My only complaint is about the solo caster format. They have the quality casters, they just need to pair them up. And I believe Wheat said onstream that there will be pairs in the future.
If IGN switched from solo league format into team league format, I would probably crap my pants in excitement.
On April 22 2011 11:24 quentel wrote: how cool is this post-game stats page?
that minimap they have makes no sence can you tell me anything at all thats going on there?
its cool but it doesn't have a point. oh the game was a lot further gone then what the castor told me it was. it would be a lot better if it actualy told something that wasn't on the stats page that no one really looks at anyway. how many colossi where killed? bases lost? k/d ratio would be fun as well.
pretty but boaring sad to say thats what the IPL is looking to me. was a HUGE fan and would have hyped it up like hell but the gloss wore off for me and I just can't watch it above the nasl at this point
The minimap gives an idea of what the base situation was like at the end of the game.
There is a unit lost listing, what exactly do you mean by a K/D Ratio? Colossi lost, unit specific counts would be kind of weird. I don't really see why those would be necessary...
For those complaining about single cast. They will have dual cast in season 2 as far as I know. So enjoy the awesome work and be happy, that even if this is awesome, they still will improve
I've got the NASL and IGN streams up side by side and it's just night and day. Well done IGN, I hope you keep the quality up while showing some great games. I'm really impressed with the amount of sc2 content we have now.
IGNProlegues head of Esports or whatever on SOTG stated that no matter what at the least their production quality is probably going to be better than most other tournaments, maybe besides GSL. Glad to see he wasn't just trying to talk shit and sound cool! This stream is beautiful. I hope the games are as well!! Hard to watch NASL ever again...
On April 22 2011 11:24 quentel wrote: how cool is this post-game stats page?
that minimap they have makes no sence can you tell me anything at all thats going on there?
its cool but it doesn't have a point. oh the game was a lot further gone then what the castor told me it was. it would be a lot better if it actualy told something that wasn't on the stats page that no one really looks at anyway. how many colossi where killed? bases lost? k/d ratio would be fun as well.
pretty but boaring sad to say thats what the IPL is looking to me. was a HUGE fan and would have hyped it up like hell but the gloss wore off for me and I just can't watch it above the nasl at this point
I disagree. I love how it shows where the buildings are and which areas each players controls. It doesn't have to be specific as to what units each players have but it does get the point out of where the buildings are.
On April 22 2011 11:24 quentel wrote: how cool is this post-game stats page?
that minimap they have makes no sence can you tell me anything at all thats going on there?
its cool but it doesn't have a point. oh the game was a lot further gone then what the castor told me it was. it would be a lot better if it actualy told something that wasn't on the stats page that no one really looks at anyway. how many colossi where killed? bases lost? k/d ratio would be fun as well.
pretty but boaring sad to say thats what the IPL is looking to me. was a HUGE fan and would have hyped it up like hell but the gloss wore off for me and I just can't watch it above the nasl at this point
I think it's sc2gears (http://sites.google.com/site/sc2gears/) or at least something very similar. Pretty cool really but kind of ambiguous if you have no idea about it.
We shouldn't be surprised at this quality. We've known the Well-Played guys were doing it for a while, so we need only look at the SCRI to see how this would turn out. Frankly, its just weird that the NASL is produced the way it is when communities like TL and reddit can churn out IGN-worthy quality.
wow im so fucked up by all these "WOW THATS SO AMAZING" tweets :S I GOT IT. were the known sc2 guys payed for talking good about ign? and all these retweets by ign themself... why would you retweet that you are amazing yourself?
i remember a time where esports was presentet live, that was amazing actualy
On April 22 2011 11:34 Applecakes wrote: IPLs production is amazing. That can't be denied. But I still find myself watching NASL.
The "newbie" friendly approach of the IPL doesn't appeal to me. I don't really like the casting style of TB and wheat. I have nothing against them, or their style in itself. And in fact, I think it's fantastic that IPL is going for a broader audience with their choice of casters. But I prefer a bit more "analysis".
NASL (at the moment) has more of my favourite players too. Whitera, Nada, etc. I just can't pass that up. And there have been some really entertaining sets. It'll be interesting to see who plays eventually plays in IPL.
Either way, I think it's amazing that we now have two good leagues, both of which I hope get better over time. 2011 is gunna be awesme!
I agree completely with the casting comment, without pros commentating you don't really "know" what's going on. Play by play commentating misses so many of the nuances of build orders (probe cut here, feign aggression as part of the build there) it's really hard to analyze what's exactly going on.
The production is great but the commentary leaves something to be desired. I like wheat but he really shines when he is alongside a more annalytical commentator. As for total biscuit, I'm just not a fan. Never have been.
On April 22 2011 11:34 Applecakes wrote: IPLs production is amazing. That can't be denied. But I still find myself watching NASL.
The "newbie" friendly approach of the IPL doesn't appeal to me. I don't really like the casting style of TB and wheat. I have nothing against them, or their style in itself. And in fact, I think it's fantastic that IPL is going for a broader audience with their choice of casters. But I prefer a bit more "analysis".
NASL (at the moment) has more of my favourite players too. Whitera, Nada, etc. I just can't pass that up. And there have been some really entertaining sets. It'll be interesting to see who plays eventually plays in IPL.
Either way, I think it's amazing that we now have two good leagues, both of which I hope get better over time. 2011 is gunna be awesme!
I agree completely with the casting comment, without pros commentating you don't really "know" what's going on. Play by play commentating misses so many of the nuances of build orders (probe cut here, feign aggression as part of the build there) it's really hard to analyze what's exactly going on.
I would watch NASL, but for me (free watcher), the audio quality is so bad it's unwatchable. I don't want to hear some guy on a 32 kbps skype connection and then Gretorp with a bad mic (or encoding). The audio on NASL is really, really bad. Also, I don't know why they lag so much and IGN's seems to not? IGN's quality is off the chain.
I like it very very much!! it has it own style of show ^^ It seems "video game" style hehe, but is really nice.
But to say something, i preffer the double commentary than just one, it feels more like a monologue xP. But anyway both casters are awesome by themself so maybe is just a habit thing
On April 22 2011 10:55 Mephiztopheles1 wrote: Very nice from the IPL, but people trash talking the NASL are seriously getting out of proportion... not even GOM has this kind of production, and it's simple enough why: Rupert Murdoch. If you can't really see the difference that was to be expected between a Rupert Murdoch owned company and seven amateur esports fans, no matter how you try to spin it, what you're saying is that you want the NASL to fail. Unless what you're trying to say is that you want all media billionaires in the world to get into esports. In that case, I'm all ears as to how you're going to do it.
Still, we should keep being nice to the IPL so they spoil us more, that way even GOM may fear going down in the pecking order of the community, 'cause really, half of what keeps GOM up there is Tastosis
Edit: ^^^ You know, some people don't want to know what you just said...
As has been said several times, this event was produced by the team at WellPlayed.org. None of us are paid.
I got some of my hardcore cs/cod FPS buddies to watch and appreciate SC2 a bit more after watching some of this tonight. Don't get me wrong I think theirs a couple of things that helped in this respect: 1. Its a bank holiday tomorrow and we don't have work/college in the morning and 2. They know and could associate with a mainstream name like IGN.
But, having worked briefly in graphics professionally in the past and I'd just want to give props the team who came up with the idea of the street fighter style win and introducing screens plus the simplfied stat screens at the end of the game. From listening to them on teamspeak and not having a clue about Starcraft they they were obviously making the link between Street fighter style format at the start and also having a score screen similar to FPS games at the end.
I know its hardly substantial proof and I don't even know if this was the intention of it but its small subtle touches like this that may just catch the attention of people who are unaware just how fun and entertaining SC2 is to watch and play.
I'd just like to give a thumbs up to them and IGN for putting this tournament together, I really think this is the sort of tournament that has huge potential to reach out to a wider gaming audience.
Agree on all of the production points, everything looks and feels great!
Two complaints I would like addressed:
There are no breaks or recaps of why people are winning, for newcomers this is really hard to get in to and as someone who knows the SC2 scene quite well I found myself lost at multiple points when I left the room for a bit and there was a whole new series playing. Some continuity and transitions between games would help. On the same tangent give me time to go to the bathroom! Pause between games please.
Secondly... I hope the second season has a better cast of players, or some sort of qualification process. Some of these matchups are so onesided.
I wouldve not expected less from IGN, they couldnt afford a fuck up (unlike NASL who only has an already established sc crowd to please). It had to look polished and be IGN-user friendly, meaning anything but a sc nerd. Grats to them it, its really well done and shows what could be done with other tournaments.
The only thing IPL has going against it right now as others have mentioned is player pool. This is understandable since this was a "test run". This shows very clearly the difference between a real company people have to apply and meet the qualifications of jobs for and a start up company that chooses to hire their less experienced buddies who may have the passion but lack the education/experience. It is obvious to anyone who has spent any time in production, editing, or graphic design that IPL has properly trained staff well NASL does not.
TONS of props to IGN for pulling off such a SICK tournament
Sure they are lacking a huge list of players and some analytical casters, but those are the EASIEST things to get. They have shown everyone that they are absolutely serious about this tournament, and with the bigger prize pool for next season, overcoming their hurdles (players and casters) will be absolutely simple. I bet players and casters will BEG IGN to be in the IPL. It's seriously that amazing. Post game stats? Amazing. Street fighter voice + presentation? Amazing. Sick overlay? Amazing. Super excited for the $100k season 2.
DJWheat would be awesome with a good analytical caster pairing with him.
TotalBiscuit can be hard to pair with someone, I feel like he works better on his own but overall I feel like a strong pair of casters is just the way to go for a tournament.
On April 22 2011 10:17 Eppa! wrote: Having no analytical commentators is pretty annoying.
^The only problem thus far in my opinion
Total biscuit is actually providing some good insight from time to time on why players are making the decisions that they are (yeah my grammar sux haha)
While the casting is not quite as insightful as a pro player might provide, I'm enjoying the IGN audio a ton more than the NASL as I switch back and forth between the two. Although, I must say Khaldor is a fantastic caster
On April 22 2011 10:17 Eppa! wrote: Having no analytical commentators is pretty annoying.
^The only problem thus far in my opinion
Total biscuit is actually providing some good insight from time to time on why players are making the decisions that they are (yeah my grammar sux haha)
Agreed IMO his game knowledge is becoming quite impressive [he knows the names of all the upgrades, (something even the most venerated casters often lack)]
On April 22 2011 10:38 Jtn wrote: Hate to break it to you this way, but....NASL is not live.
Right, but the casting is recorded while the game is happening, and it's aired only a couple hours later, am I right?
I've always wondered what the benefit is from commenting the games live and then only broadcasting them later after post production. It seems like a lot of problems NASL suffers from (odd structure, comments that don't sync with aired content, casters disappearing then reappearing, allow them to fall victim to pauses and other in-game difficulties, etc) all happen because they choose to do this.
If the games were commented from replays or if they were commented live... if they're both broadcasted on a delay, what's the point?
The only thing I can think of is the ability to say: "Here at NASL, we don't comment games from replays." All to trick people who hate replays and attempt to appease them. But it doesn't actually do anything positive for the live feed.
Unless I'm missing something, a lot of their problems would be fixed if they cast from replays.
On April 22 2011 11:57 Ezze wrote: I just realized that on the summary page the map is actually a heat map of sorts and shows army movements. How did they do that??
On April 22 2011 10:55 Mephiztopheles1 wrote: Very nice from the IPL, but people trash talking the NASL are seriously getting out of proportion... not even GOM has this kind of production, and it's simple enough why: Rupert Murdoch. If you can't really see the difference that was to be expected between a Rupert Murdoch owned company and seven amateur esports fans, no matter how you try to spin it, what you're saying is that you want the NASL to fail. Unless what you're trying to say is that you want all media billionaires in the world to get into esports. In that case, I'm all ears as to how you're going to do it.
Still, we should keep being nice to the IPL so they spoil us more, that way even GOM may fear going down in the pecking order of the community, 'cause really, half of what keeps GOM up there is Tastosis
Edit: ^^^ You know, some people don't want to know what you just said...
As has been said several times, this event was produced by the team at WellPlayed.org. None of us are paid.
I see. I take back what I said then.
Then that begs the question, you also work with the NASL, what's up with the "humongous" difference in perceived quality?
We are partnered with the NASL as their official community, they have their own production team. We are the production team for IPL's broadcast as well as the official community. Sorry if that was unclear!
That clears up the confusion, thank you for your response
On April 22 2011 11:57 Ezze wrote: I just realized that on the summary page the map is actually a heat map of sorts and shows army movements. How did they do that??
Ya that stuff is awesome, looks like the soccer post game reports!
Honesty, this stuff looks better than GOMTv.... it's really impressive
On April 22 2011 11:58 BlackMagister wrote: How is IPL making money anyways? Haven't watched the whole thing but haven't seen any ads so far.
No ads on day 1 and day 2 as a present to fans for helping them getting 1000 facebook fans.
Otherwise there will be ads between games and ads on VODs.
They plan on making money from advertising, shouldn't be too intrusive.
like nasl, i turn off the volume on the screen and every 10 minutes the olive garden ad comes in FULL BLAST and the only way to shut it off is to turn my speakers off. blar.
Positives : Production value. Crisp stream, audio. Very smoothly run game to game. No real hiccups so far. Excellent endings stats overlay. I think all tourneys should add something like this.
Negatives (rooms for improvement rather, take this as constructive criticism)
Single casted games. Hard for one guy to catch everything, plus commentate as well as provide deep insight. Some casters are fairly low level and have less game knowledge than many viewers, which they will improve in that area with time, but it can be semi-amusing at times.
Player pool is interesting. Don't understand why agh is there, I mean, he's good. But was there qualifiers or did they just pick people at random? I like to see new faces though.
also, too much of the phrase "ladies and gentlemen" :D
Overall, great league. How they continue in the good, and improve the bad. Other leagues can learn from some things they do, as well as the IPL learning from leagues.
On April 22 2011 10:55 Mephiztopheles1 wrote: Very nice from the IPL, but people trash talking the NASL are seriously getting out of proportion... not even GOM has this kind of production, and it's simple enough why: Rupert Murdoch. If you can't really see the difference that was to be expected between a Rupert Murdoch owned company and seven amateur esports fans, no matter how you try to spin it, what you're saying is that you want the NASL to fail. Unless what you're trying to say is that you want all media billionaires in the world to get into esports. In that case, I'm all ears as to how you're going to do it.
Still, we should keep being nice to the IPL so they spoil us more, that way even GOM may fear going down in the pecking order of the community, 'cause really, half of what keeps GOM up there is Tastosis
Edit: ^^^ You know, some people don't want to know what you just said...
As has been said several times, this event was produced by the team at WellPlayed.org. None of us are paid.
I see. I take back what I said then.
Then that begs the question, you also work with the NASL, what's up with the "humongous" difference in perceived quality?
We are partnered with the NASL as their official community, they have their own production team. We are the production team for IPL's broadcast as well as the official community. Sorry if that was unclear!
What about "official community" is *not* an oxymoron lol? Do you mean that wellplayed is like your public affairs branch?
Agree with most of the people here, this production is amazing.
I also have two constructive notes to add:
1) As has already been mentioned: the casters could be improved by pairing them. Solo casts are never as good as dual.
2) I'd love some chit-chat inbetween games, going over what happened / strats, talking about the stats we are seeing and talking about where the players stand in the league when the overlay pops up. Nothing too long, just some simple comments to make the whole experience more cohesive and more like a "show" rather than "youtube videos linked together". The time between games doesn't have to increase (or if it did , only by 30 seconds or so), just add some talk over what is already there.
If these two small issues were resolved this league would be absolutely perfect and blow everything else out of the water. The only thing better is live casts à la GSL, but I realise that doesn't seem to be viable in NA.
On April 22 2011 11:57 loveeholicce wrote: Can some1 please explain the whole issue where ign accidentaly spoiled their games?
Otherwise great tourney
Personally, first time I got spoiled over the results was here at TL when going over a certain fan club where some users had seen the match history and saw it fit with the brackets of the frist round of matches of the league. Then, the brackets at IGN's site were uploaded with the results up.
like nasl, i turn off the volume on the screen and every 10 minutes the olive garden ad comes in FULL BLAST and the only way to shut it off is to turn my speakers off. blar.
Use adblock. When people insist on broadcasting ads in an unnecessary and overly irritating way this is the best way to force change.
On April 22 2011 10:22 Teivospy wrote: who cares if one is better than the other I am thankful we have BOTH
that said IGN obv has more money than NASL, but I hope NASL gets better over time :D
This is very true, I am so glad I have 2 monitors, I have been watching both, just been paying slightly more attention to whichever matchup I am more interested at the time.
Personally, about the casters, although HD and TB don't have nearly as much knowledge about the game as some of the other top level casters do, they're still very good casters.
They're damn entertaining to watch and while they miss things, it still makes for good viewership. In my opinion, IPL should have dual casters. Keep TB and HD and the lineup they have now, but pair them up with casters with more analytical knowledge. This way you can reach out to the casual crowd who really just care about watching stuff blow up and a guy screaming about it while the more hardcore fans can enjoy the analytical, higher level casting.
On April 22 2011 12:07 Ryuu314 wrote: Personally, about the casters, although HD and TB don't have nearly as much knowledge about the game as some of the other top level casters do, they're still very good casters.
They're damn entertaining to watch and while they miss things, it still makes for good viewership. In my opinion, IPL should have dual casters. Keep TB and HD and the lineup they have now, but pair them up with casters with more analytical knowledge. This way you can reach out to the casual crowd who really just care about watching stuff blow up and a guy screaming about it while the more hardcore fans can enjoy the analytical, higher level casting.
On April 22 2011 12:03 Lush wrote: Positives : Production value. Crisp stream, audio. Very smoothly run game to game. No real hiccups so far. Excellent endings stats overlay. I think all tourneys should add something like this.
Negatives (rooms for improvement rather, take this as constructive criticism)
Single casted games. Hard for one guy to catch everything, plus commentate as well as provide deep insight. Some casters are fairly low level and have less game knowledge than many viewers, which they will improve in that area with time, but it can be semi-amusing at times.
Player pool is interesting. Don't understand why agh is there, I mean, he's good. But was there qualifiers or did they just pick people at random? I like to see new faces though.
Overall, great league. How they continue in the good, and improve the bad. Other leagues can learn from some things they do, as well as the IPL learning from leagues.
As for the players, this is an introductory test series. The 16 players are invites, the top 4 get automatically put into the real series which will be IPL Season 2.
The second season will be a 32 player series with 28 of those qualifying through matches and the top 4 from this tournament carrying over.
I think it is awesome. I like the fact that they play game after game without too much fluff in between. I only have so much time to watch and I prefer it to be spent on actual games. Good stuff!
On April 22 2011 12:03 Lush wrote: Positives : Production value. Crisp stream, audio. Very smoothly run game to game. No real hiccups so far. Excellent endings stats overlay. I think all tourneys should add something like this.
Negatives (rooms for improvement rather, take this as constructive criticism)
Single casted games. Hard for one guy to catch everything, plus commentate as well as provide deep insight. Some casters are fairly low level and have less game knowledge than many viewers, which they will improve in that area with time, but it can be semi-amusing at times.
Player pool is interesting. Don't understand why agh is there, I mean, he's good. But was there qualifiers or did they just pick people at random? I like to see new faces though.
Overall, great league. How they continue in the good, and improve the bad. Other leagues can learn from some things they do, as well as the IPL learning from leagues.
As for the players, this is an introductory test series. The 16 players are invites, the top 4 get automatically put into the real series which will be IPL Season 2.
The second season will be a 32 player series with 28 of those qualifying through matches and the top 4 from this tournament carrying over.
Sounds good man. I think IPL is top notch. Really doing things well, they contact the community and listen, have professionals carrying out production. Great stuff.
I agree IPL is fantastic. Loving the casters and the quality of the product overall. I am very impressed by TotalBiscuit. No need to hate on NASL though. We should all be grateful that we have these 2 new great tournaments.
On April 22 2011 12:05 Sakarabu wrote:If these two small issues were resolved this league would be absolutely perfect and blow everything else out of the water. The only thing better is live casts à la GSL, but I realise that doesn't seem to be viable in NA.
No, to be perfect IPL would need to get kpop too ^_^
like nasl, i turn off the volume on the screen and every 10 minutes the olive garden ad comes in FULL BLAST and the only way to shut it off is to turn my speakers off. blar.
Use adblock. When people insist on broadcasting ads in an unnecessary and overly irritating way this is the best way to force change.
they arn't going to change adblock just makes you a dick.
No need to hate on NASL though. We should all be grateful that we have these 2 new great tournaments.
Cmon dude. I want them both to be great but having an unpaid editing/production staff massively outshine one that is being paid? You have to acknowledge that. If this tournament shows anything it is that the SC2 community will just as quickly praise a good event as chastise a bad one. We are not haters.
No need to hate on NASL though. We should all be grateful that we have these 2 new great tournaments.
Cmon dude. I want them both to be great but having an unpaid editing/production staff massively outshine one that is being paid? You have to acknowledge that. If this tournament shows anything it is that the SC2 community will just as quickly praise a good event as chastise a bad one. We are not haters.
Agreed. NASL seems to have lower production value than any other larger tournament right now (GSL, TSL, IGN) maybe only rivaling MLG.
Gotta say IGN brought this very well the production was FANTASTIC and have to say "Alex" I thnk it was was right the production is amazing.. gj IGN keep it up.
IPL's success is actually a perfect example of NOT listening to players.
NASL has the bulk of their capital wrapped up in a robust prize pool; professional, experienced players as commentators; and a long, extensive format that gives all players a reasonably even playing field to ascend in the tournament.
IPL has a reasonably decent graphic design (I can draw better portraits than that), and play-by-play casters that can make any game sound epic.
They've pulled the wool over the 'hardcore' community's eyes. And I geniunely respect that.
IPL is the true "NASL" :p volunteers outperforming paid workers ftw.
really enjoying IPL atm, my only gripe is the solo casting and lack of analytical casters (apart from painuser) imo play-by-play commentators should never cast without an analytical caster, casuals will get bored of seeing the "same units over and over" since they don't understand the subtleties that make one opponent win or lose
No need to hate on NASL though. We should all be grateful that we have these 2 new great tournaments.
Cmon dude. I want them both to be great but having an unpaid editing/production staff massively outshine one that is being paid? You have to acknowledge that. If this tournament shows anything it is that the SC2 community will just as quickly praise a good event as chastise a bad one. We are not haters.
Agreed. NASL seems to have lower production value than any other larger tournament right now (GSL, TSL, IGN) maybe only rivaling MLG.
Well said, under-hype and over-deliver is the best way to achieve respect
No need to hate on NASL though. We should all be grateful that we have these 2 new great tournaments.
Cmon dude. I want them both to be great but having an unpaid editing/production staff massively outshine one that is being paid? You have to acknowledge that. If this tournament shows anything it is that the SC2 community will just as quickly praise a good event as chastise a bad one. We are not haters.
True but don't forget the prize pool is way lower and the season is way shorter too. Although IPL stated that this is just the first season and next ones will be way bigger in prize pools but maybe then they will charge a fee. Just a wild guess. Anyways congratulations IPL your tournament is great and I am enjoying it a lot.
On April 22 2011 12:16 Duravi wrote: No need to hate on NASL though. We should all be grateful that we have these 2 new great tournaments.
NASL runs for three months, massively bigger prizepool, more good players, in depth analysis by experienced pros, post-game player interviews and thoughts... and somehow this just isn't good enough for some people in the community. makes me sad.
I was super impressed with the overall quality of the IPL.
1. They kept everything moving along. 2. No commercials. 3. Great stream quality. 4. Everything was free. 5. Great casting. 6. Great extras and flare to the before and after of the games (like stats and "WIN!" and pictures of the players). 7. No huge mistakes.
On April 22 2011 12:23 Defacer wrote: IPL's success is actually a perfect example of NOT listening to players.
NASL has the bulk of their capital wrapped up in a robust prize pool; professional, experienced players as commentators; and a long, extensive format that gives all players a reasonably even playing field to ascend in the tournament.
I'm not sure about this part. I'm pretty sure that TotalBiscuit isn't a professional (although he's a great caster), and I'm pretty sure HD is casting IPL too. DJ Wheat isn't exactly a pro either.
And on the other hand, Gretorp and iNcontroL are actual pros, and they're casting NASL.
for starting off its pretty fuckin awesome. very pleased with IGN PL.
the dual casters are needed but I think i heard DJ Wheat said that will come in Season 2. All in All fantastic start. def prefer DJwheat/total biscuit over inc/gretorp. just much smoother.
also whoever said IPL was done by volunteers and not paid people is wrong... the people who've been working on IPL were HIRED by IGN full time...
On April 22 2011 12:25 PHILtheTANK wrote: its nice having both leagues up at once so i can pick and choose which games i wannna watch
Also TB did good tonite, but i wish he wouldn't say "rained down" so much.
Yeah I have no idea what the fuck I was doing there, I've never even used that phrase before. I believe I consciously stopped myself from using it in the later casts and with good reason, it's not even appropriate in the context it was used.
Yeah, I gotta give props to IGN. They really put together an impressive product. They've obviously been looking at the GSL model when they but this thing together. You can really see the strength and depth of their organization coming through in their product.
After watching this and comparing it (c'mon, you can't avoid it) to the NASL, it's clear that the future of tournaments like these is 100% in the production value. Show a potential viewer NASL vs IPL, and they'll chose IPL every time, prize pool and player pool be damned.
Props to the WellPlayed.org guys for such a fantastic job.
On April 22 2011 12:23 Defacer wrote: IPL's success is actually a perfect example of NOT listening to players.
NASL has the bulk of their capital wrapped up in a robust prize pool; professional, experienced players as commentators; and a long, extensive format that gives all players a reasonably even playing field to ascend in the tournament.
IPL has a reasonably decent graphic design (I can draw better portraits than that), and play-by-play casters that can make any game sound epic.
They've pulled the wool over the 'hardcore' community's eyes. And I geniunely respect that.
exactly! i'm glad there are others that share the same sentiment as i do. IPL is a great addition to esports but besides the glitter, it lacks in every other aspect of the game that true fans really care about.
after watching IPL, I can't go back to NASL, it makes it look REALLY bad, even more so then how bad they were making themselves look. I want NASL to be so good but incontrol and gretorp together seem really bland and not very exciting maybe the could be with other casters just not good together they both seem like support casters and need a lead caster which neither seem to fill that role and IGNs casters were ALL amazing every match I was glued to my seat the production was very surpriseing even being IGN it was fantasic and unlike NASL .. I can't WAIT to see the next IPL game.
Smart play by IPN here... They focused their resources (admittedly much more vast than the NASL's) in the right places. Instead of renting a studio, putting money into a live production with live casters they directed their resources to improved sound quality, slick and polished graphics and just coming away with a much more refined product.
On April 22 2011 12:07 Highways wrote: I completely agree, unbelievable production values.
IPL and NASL need to merge because the NASL production is sooo terrible.
How can NASL improve the IPL?
good players good casters good matches?
players granted, but the rest is to debate. I really hope NASL did watch with pen and paper in hand what IGN delivered today and start going to improve their stuff. There needs to be competition, and right now IPL just walks over NASL.
On April 22 2011 12:25 PHILtheTANK wrote: its nice having both leagues up at once so i can pick and choose which games i wannna watch
Also TB did good tonite, but i wish he wouldn't say "rained down" so much.
Yeah I have no idea what the fuck I was doing there, I've never even used that phrase before. I believe I consciously stopped myself from using it in the later casts and with good reason, it's not even appropriate in the context it was used.
all good man, really lookin forward to more, was a great first night!
Let me start by saying I want NASL and IPL to succeed. I do not fear having to much SC2 and think that as these leagues become bigger and more numerous, pros will have to pick and choose the leagues they participate in and that will be GOOD for esports in my opinion. I think it would be GOOD if we had rivalries like huk/idra but didnt expect to see them both at every tournament with a name. I would much rather have players dedicated to a league and only meet up for the really big events to make them more World Series/Olympic esque, instead of seeing them play every other week.
I think IPL>NASL for the following reasons: 1) IPL felt super noob friendly. They EXPLAINED even basic things. Casters like HD and TB admit they are not going for the day9 level analysis. I am glad IPL went for the fun/exciting feel with CASTERS casting, and not players casting. (Yes I know there are exceptions in that Painuser will cast for IPL and diggity for NASL)
2) Production value blew NASL out of the water...not sure anyone can argue that.
3) The single caster instead of duo...now hear me out. I PREFER having a duo if the duo is a pair that have great interaction--tastosis/daywheat for example. But people like TB have made a name for themself as a solo caster and he can handle the job. Right now my issue with NASL is that when incontrol isnt there, we have gretorp jumping partners and not really getting into a groove with his partner, this will be fixed with time I know, but it goes with #2 in that the current state of casting I have to give the edge to IPL
3-a) I HAAAATE when NASL has 1 live caster and 1 skype/vent/teamspeak in and that it is very evident one person is not in the studio. The distant sound of the cocaster is a peev of mine. By having a solo caster on IPL they have avoided this.
That is all, I just hope as NASL and IPL go into future seasons we have players in one OR the other, and not a bunch of people in both.
On April 22 2011 12:29 PhiliBiRD wrote: also whoever said IPL was done by volunteers and not paid people is wrong... the people who've been working on IPL were HIRED by IGN full time...
far from "volunteer", more like career.
I'm part of the WellPlayed production team and that's not true.
NASL runs for three months, massively bigger prizepool, more good players, in depth analysis by experienced pros, post-game player interviews and thoughts... and somehow this just isn't good enough for some people in the community. makes me sad.
How can you not understand that NASL is paying people to do a job that people are doing for free with IPL and the paid people are performing not just a little bit worse, but alot? They have not fixed their sound issues after seven fucking episodes. They still have fps issues that anyone in production would recognize as unacceptable. These are not personal preference issues like casters. At some point you have to stop being an esports cheerleader and be realistic. SC2 community is hungry for a good quality broadcast we can follow regularly, up to this point NASL is not it, not even close but IPL is showing every sign that they can do it especially once they have a good player base.
Remember, this is the first season for BOTH leagues. Hopefully they will both learn from each other going forward, because if we could get IPL's production level with the experience level and players of NASL, we'll have two AMAZING products that would both be effective at brining the viewers in.
On April 22 2011 12:29 PhiliBiRD wrote: also whoever said IPL was done by volunteers and not paid people is wrong... the people who've been working on IPL were HIRED by IGN full time...
I love the total at the end showing units lost and mining so good, casting was pretty awesome too, I like the single casting, but dueling cast is nice in between games but they went straight in to them so it didn't really matter.
yea awesome job atleast us from EU could watch the IGN stream when we had black stream from NASL. To my supprice I was actually impressed by the overall quality of you production so yea amasing job plz do more
On April 22 2011 12:23 Defacer wrote: IPL's success is actually a perfect example of NOT listening to players.
NASL has the bulk of their capital wrapped up in a robust prize pool; professional, experienced players as commentators; and a long, extensive format that gives all players a reasonably even playing field to ascend in the tournament.
IPL has a reasonably decent graphic design (I can draw better portraits than that), and play-by-play casters that can make any game sound epic.
They've pulled the wool over the 'hardcore' community's eyes. And I geniunely respect that.
exactly! i'm glad there are others that share the same sentiment as i do. IPL is a great addition to esports but besides the glitter, it lacks in every other aspect of the game that true fans really care about.
I find this phrase really obnoxious. Am I alone in that?
I like that phrase.
Phrases like that alienate the people that have no idea what's going on with in this game. SC2 needs new people to survive, the "true fans" are the ones that are already playing and will watch these leagues no matter what. Community needs to grow to survive.
On April 22 2011 12:03 gogogadgetflow wrote: What about "official community" is *not* an oxymoron lol? Do you mean that wellplayed is like your public affairs branch?
By "official community" we mean WellPlayed is the official place to go and discuss these events and matches. It is sanctioned by NASL and IGN for this purpose.
As for IGN, we have an extra responsibility of editing and producing their content. This is also another service that WellPlayed offers.
We understand that not everyone in the whole world knows about our services (yet) so thank you for your questions!
On April 22 2011 12:29 PhiliBiRD wrote: for starting off its pretty fuckin awesome. very pleased with IGN PL.
the dual casters are needed but I think i heard DJ Wheat said that will come in Season 2. All in All fantastic start. def prefer DJwheat/total biscuit over inc/gretorp. just much smoother.
also whoever said IPL was done by volunteers and not paid people is wrong... the people who've been working on IPL were HIRED by IGN full time...
far from "volunteer", more like career.
Well, judging from this, this and this, the production crew certainly appears to be made up of volunteers. Major props to WellPlayed for an outstanding show tonight!
On April 22 2011 12:07 Highways wrote: I completely agree, unbelievable production values.
IPL and NASL need to merge because the NASL production is sooo terrible.
How can NASL improve the IPL?
WAY better players, i didn't catch all of the IPL but what i did catch was fun and all, amazing production value but.........
can you name one epic game? Idras games were idra killing
catz base in yo base? damn good so maybe
but anything else? select dominating like he should,. seems like it was blah from players with a lot of wow factor in production
like i said i didnt catch it all so i could be wrong, still a amazing tournament set up they have going on
Well the IPL is more like the real North American League. In that regard, the NASL's large prize pool is what draws the great players. When IGN offers something comparable, the matchups will be just as good.
On April 22 2011 12:07 Highways wrote: I completely agree, unbelievable production values.
IPL and NASL need to merge because the NASL production is sooo terrible.
How can NASL improve the IPL?
good players good casters good matches?
players granted, but the rest is to debate. I really hope NASL did watch with pen and paper in hand what IGN delivered today and start going to improve their stuff. There needs to be competition, and right now IPL just walks over NASL.
but all of NASL's problems are technical all of IPL's are fundamental.
more then one caster? gretorp getting better every night inc is a legit player thats actually playing well in the league. Diggity coming in and doing well. and kalador who is a very very good. TB is a horrid caster that got on my nerves in a single game.
Yesterday I watched 3 games of Sheth vs rainbow godlike 40+ games in each one. They where better then anything that IPL had today. poorly done 4 gate rush after poorly done 4 gate rush does not a good stream make.
and if tomarrow somehow they fix the stream and it isn't total shit whos a lot better? hell even MLG's going to have a great stream next event.
the gloss is going to come off the IPL and people are gona start seeing that. It looks fucking amazing but that can only go so far
On April 22 2011 12:38 DirtYLOu wrote: IPL >>>>>> NASL
And to think that NASL has SO MUCH more money, and still IPL's production is better...
Just cause its shinier does NOT mean its better. IPL cannot compete with the player lineup and the amount of matches NASL has right now. Lets remember why we love starcraft so much. We love the players and the competition!
also whoever said IPL was done by volunteers and not paid people is wrong... the people who've been working on IPL were HIRED by IGN full time...
far from "volunteer", more like career.
They stated themselves that they are unpaid. So either they are lying or you are a moron.
Uhhh interview with Alex from IGN at wellplayed.org:
Q: Who are you working with on this project?
A: We're working closely with Justin.tv to provide a great viewing experience for all of our viewers. In addition, we have hired on the team at Well Played Productions to assist with our post-production efforts to make the IPL as polished and professional as possible.
On April 22 2011 12:29 PhiliBiRD wrote: for starting off its pretty fuckin awesome. very pleased with IGN PL.
the dual casters are needed but I think i heard DJ Wheat said that will come in Season 2. All in All fantastic start. def prefer DJwheat/total biscuit over inc/gretorp. just much smoother.
also whoever said IPL was done by volunteers and not paid people is wrong... the people who've been working on IPL were HIRED by IGN full time...
far from "volunteer", more like career.
Well, judging from this, this and this, the production crew certainly appears to be made up of volunteers. Major props to WellPlayed for an outstanding show tonight!
An extremely professional product from a volunteer operation, great to see such a great show the first day, hope for the best to come!
On April 22 2011 12:07 Highways wrote: I completely agree, unbelievable production values.
IPL and NASL need to merge because the NASL production is sooo terrible.
How can NASL improve the IPL?
good players good casters good matches?
players granted, but the rest is to debate. I really hope NASL did watch with pen and paper in hand what IGN delivered today and start going to improve their stuff. There needs to be competition, and right now IPL just walks over NASL.
but all of NASL's problems are technical all of IPL's are fundamental.
more then one caster? gretorp getting better every night inc is a legit player thats actually playing well in the league. Diggity coming in and doing well. and kalador who is a very very good. TB is a horrid caster that got on my nerves in a single game.
Yesterday I watched 3 games of Sheth vs rainbow godlike 40+ games in each one. They where better then anything that IPL had today. poorly done 4 gate rush after poorly done 4 gate rush does not a good stream make.
and if tomarrow somehow they fix the stream and it isn't total shit whos a lot better? hell even MLG's going to have a great stream next event.
the gloss is going to come off the IPL and people are gona start seeing that. It looks fucking amazing but that can only go so far
I think this is the best analysis of IPL right now. Not to be entirely negative I think it does show promise and hopefully will get better...
On April 22 2011 12:07 Highways wrote: I completely agree, unbelievable production values.
IPL and NASL need to merge because the NASL production is sooo terrible.
How can NASL improve the IPL?
good players good casters good matches?
players granted, but the rest is to debate. I really hope NASL did watch with pen and paper in hand what IGN delivered today and start going to improve their stuff. There needs to be competition, and right now IPL just walks over NASL.
but all of NASL's problems are technical all of IPL's are fundamental.
more then one caster? gretorp getting better every night inc is a legit player thats actually playing well in the league. Diggity coming in and doing well. and kalador who is a very very good. TB is a horrid caster that got on my nerves in a single game.
Yesterday I watched 3 games of Sheth vs rainbow godlike 40+ games in each one. They where better then anything that IPL had today. poorly done 4 gate rush after poorly done 4 gate rush does not a good stream make.
and if tomarrow somehow they fix the stream and it isn't total shit whos a lot better? hell even MLG's going to have a great stream next event.
the gloss is going to come off the IPL and people are gona start seeing that. It looks fucking amazing but that can only go so far
Or, it is also possible that your opinion isn't set-in-stone fact and people actually enjoy the casting and the games.
I love these so called 'true fans' of eSports taking a dump on everything they possibly can while contributing nothing of their own to the scene they supposedly live and breath. Thank God they are only a tiny vocal minority or eSports would be in real trouble.
On April 22 2011 12:38 DirtYLOu wrote: IPL >>>>>> NASL
And to think that NASL has SO MUCH more money, and still IPL's production is better...
Just cause its shinier does NOT mean its better. IPL cannot compete with the player lineup and the amount of matches NASL has right now. Lets remember why we love starcraft so much. We love the players and the competition!
Totalbiscuit sounds like he is casting a Horse Race when he starts talking really fast.
"AND ITS SELECT BY A NOSE!!!"
The cast was amazing. DJwheat was really good. Solo casts are normally not the best, but he proved he could hold his own in casting. I loved his total Zerg bias in some of the games though. Added flavor.
Something that I like that both IPL and NASL does is allowing players to pick their own colors. Adds some flavor to a bland Red/Blue color scheme.
On April 22 2011 12:38 DirtYLOu wrote: IPL >>>>>> NASL
And to think that NASL has SO MUCH more money, and still IPL's production is better...
Just cause its shinier does NOT mean its better. IPL cannot compete with the player lineup and the amount of matches NASL has right now. Lets remember why we love starcraft so much. We love the players and the competition!
I agree, I really enjoy the quality of matches the NASL offers. That being said, the IPL made a hell of a first impression and I think a lot of pros will be accepting of an invite once the IPL expands. Pretty damn good showing.
On April 22 2011 12:38 DirtYLOu wrote: IPL >>>>>> NASL
And to think that NASL has SO MUCH more money, and still IPL's production is better...
Just cause its shinier does NOT mean its better. IPL cannot compete with the player lineup and the amount of matches NASL has right now. Lets remember why we love starcraft so much. We love the players and the competition!
I agree but us from EU can watch it so wtf is the point!!
On April 22 2011 12:16 Duravi wrote: No need to hate on NASL though. We should all be grateful that we have these 2 new great tournaments.
NASL runs for three months, massively bigger prizepool, more good players, in depth analysis by experienced pros, post-game player interviews and thoughts... and somehow this just isn't good enough for some people in the community. makes me sad.
I don't know about massively bigger pool, season one Ipl is to seed top 4 into a 32 man season 2 with a $50,000 pool. And if attention grows expect ign to fund even bigger prizes. Tonight was top notch production, wellplayed really shined.
Uhhh interview with Alex from IGN at wellplayed.org:
Well if this is the case they should explain themselves. Either way their production quality was obviously higher but to say you are volunteers and to actually have a paid component is misleading.
I find this phrase really obnoxious. Am I alone in that?
it does seem a little obnoxious, but let's be honest here. i watched the first day of IPL and you casted like you were selling starcraft 2 to a bunch of console gamers. i don't have an issue with that because you're bringing a bunch of people into esports but at the same time alienating those of us that really love it enough to stay up till 4 am watching live GSL - the "true fans"
Uhhh interview with Alex from IGN at wellplayed.org:
Well if this is the case they should explain themselves. Either way their production quality was obviously higher but to say you are volunteers and to actually have a paid component is misleading.
Looking at some of the posts from the wp people here on TL it's unclear. They said they're not getting paid for this event..
Great work, great to see it done right from day 1..
I like how after NASL we got a "tips for NASL to improve" thread and after IGN we get a "omg its amazing" thread.
My only suggestion: When on player info page (with the lines of info) please show what country they are from with a flag maybe, NASL missed this also and its great to see and people love to root for players from their own country etc.
Tuned into NASL for about 30 minutes, got fed up with stream / audio quality - tuned into IPL, was blown away by production value and smooth stream.
I spent the 25 on NASL, but I haven't gotten what I expected out if it. I want NASL to do better, but the IPL seriously made a great impression tonight and I'm questioning the next NASL season pass.
I find this phrase really obnoxious. Am I alone in that?
it does seem a little obnoxious, but let's be honest here. i watched the first day of IPL and you casted like you were selling starcraft 2 to a bunch of console gamers. i don't have an issue with that because you're bringing a bunch of people into esports but at the same time alienating those of us that really love it enough to stay up till 4 am watching live GSL - the "true fans"
Not really. Some of you are alienated, but not all. The noisy few will always come out in opposition of play-by-play casting, but it's the silent majority that are more important. Every caster alienates somebody, it's not worth worrying about and in this case, the IPL was not aimed squarely at TL's demographic anyway, yet still managed to attract and SUSTAIN a significant viewer count from them, so that alone is proof the concept is worth pursuing.
The negativity really is rather depressing if ya take it too seriously and it seems some people are more interesting in tearing down the efforts of others all in the name of 'true fandom'. A true fan would celebrate anything that moves eSports forward, I would think.
On April 22 2011 12:07 Highways wrote: I completely agree, unbelievable production values.
IPL and NASL need to merge because the NASL production is sooo terrible.
How can NASL improve the IPL?
good players good casters good matches?
players granted, but the rest is to debate. I really hope NASL did watch with pen and paper in hand what IGN delivered today and start going to improve their stuff. There needs to be competition, and right now IPL just walks over NASL.
but all of NASL's problems are technical all of IPL's are fundamental.
more then one caster? gretorp getting better every night inc is a legit player thats actually playing well in the league. Diggity coming in and doing well. and kalador who is a very very good. TB is a horrid caster that got on my nerves in a single game.
Yesterday I watched 3 games of Sheth vs rainbow godlike 40+ games in each one. They where better then anything that IPL had today. poorly done 4 gate rush after poorly done 4 gate rush does not a good stream make.
and if tomarrow somehow they fix the stream and it isn't total shit whos a lot better? hell even MLG's going to have a great stream next event.
the gloss is going to come off the IPL and people are gona start seeing that. It looks fucking amazing but that can only go so far
Or, it is also possible that your opinion isn't set-in-stone fact and people actually enjoy the casting and the games.
I love these so called 'true fans' of eSports taking a dump on everything they possibly can while contributing nothing of their own to the scene they supposedly live and breath. Thank God they are only a tiny vocal minority or eSports would be in real trouble.
Totoally agree with you TB. Esport is growing and just like boxing is not about hardcore fans anymore its about the casuals get them and esport is a succes and the onyl way to get them is getting some awesome shoutcasters and a really good production value do that right and the fans will tune in and then players will follow so gj to everyone at IGN
On April 22 2011 12:23 Defacer wrote: IPL's success is actually a perfect example of NOT listening to players.
NASL has the bulk of their capital wrapped up in a robust prize pool; professional, experienced players as commentators; and a long, extensive format that gives all players a reasonably even playing field to ascend in the tournament.
IPL has a reasonably decent graphic design (I can draw better portraits than that), and play-by-play casters that can make any game sound epic.
They've pulled the wool over the 'hardcore' community's eyes. And I geniunely respect that.
That's funny but it's true. Turns out giving the players exactly what they say that want isn't as entertaining as giving the masses (including me) what they actually enjoy. Would the Koreans rather have a 9-week long group stage instead of having to risk falling from S to A to oblivion? I'm guessing yeah, but it wouldn't be near as exciting as watching Boxer basically playing for his progaming career on korean TV (If he went to code B he might never get back on televised GSL).
I agree with everything you said except maybe the wording of "pulled the wool" over us. IPL doesn't pretend to be for hardcore fans or try to fool anyone. It aims at being a good evening of entertainment, and in that respect it has done extremely well on day one.
On April 22 2011 12:07 Highways wrote: I completely agree, unbelievable production values.
IPL and NASL need to merge because the NASL production is sooo terrible.
How can NASL improve the IPL?
good players good casters good matches?
players granted, but the rest is to debate. I really hope NASL did watch with pen and paper in hand what IGN delivered today and start going to improve their stuff. There needs to be competition, and right now IPL just walks over NASL.
but all of NASL's problems are technical all of IPL's are fundamental.
more then one caster? gretorp getting better every night inc is a legit player thats actually playing well in the league. Diggity coming in and doing well. and kalador who is a very very good. TB is a horrid caster that got on my nerves in a single game.
Yesterday I watched 3 games of Sheth vs rainbow godlike 40+ games in each one. They where better then anything that IPL had today. poorly done 4 gate rush after poorly done 4 gate rush does not a good stream make.
and if tomarrow somehow they fix the stream and it isn't total shit whos a lot better? hell even MLG's going to have a great stream next event.
the gloss is going to come off the IPL and people are gona start seeing that. It looks fucking amazing but that can only go so far
Or, it is also possible that your opinion isn't set-in-stone fact and people actually enjoy the casting and the games.
I love these so called 'true fans' of eSports taking a dump on everything they possibly can while contributing nothing of their own to the scene they supposedly live and breath. Thank God they are only a tiny vocal minority or eSports would be in real trouble.
my views arn't set in stone if you saw any of the threads I was completely jacked for IPL and I was loving the stream every moment until TB came on.
"tiny minority"? did you even look at the viewer counts for tonight? NASL was 5k less then IPL at the start but at the end it was less then 1k away from each other.
Even day9 said that he enjoyed his trolls and hes a god among us whats wrong with you? I'm saying my opinion you don't have to attack me because of that.
On April 22 2011 12:23 Defacer wrote: NASL has the bulk of their capital wrapped up in a robust prize pool
This first IPL is a test run, I have confidence if it goes well, they have the financial means to match NASL's prize pool
On April 22 2011 12:23 Defacer wrote: ...professional, experienced players as commentators
I actually would classify TB and djWheat as being more professional and having more expereience in casting than Gretorp/Inc. Progamer does not equate to being good/professional casters
On April 22 2011 12:23 Defacer wrote: ...and a long, extensive format that gives all players a reasonably even playing field to ascend in the tournament.
If you listen to SotG, they cover this topic quite well. There are many matches right now being covered by IPL, NASL, GSL, and TSL, etc. None of the first few weeks of NASL matches will be very exciting because there isn't much on the line right now from a spectating experience.
On April 22 2011 12:23 Defacer wrote: They've pulled the wool over the 'hardcore' community's eyes. And I geniunely respect that.
IPL is trying to reach out to attract a wider audience for SC2 and Esports and so far, they're on the right track. What does being "hardcore" have to do with anything?
If NASL would resolve their production issues (primarily sound and framerate) I personally would have watched it over IPL tonight. NASL has had way better matches so far, and Gretorp/Inc have been improving day after day. But the audio quality is painful (and seems to be getting worse) and the framerate is irritating.
It's easy to say IGN's production is just glitter, but having a stream that's easy to watch and listen to is pretty key. If IGN gets caster duos and better matches, it will be a force for sure. The production is there, they just need to flesh the rest of it out.
But I still think TSL does it best. Polished but not flashy, great matches, great casters, good stream. Boom.
On April 22 2011 12:51 sermokala wrote: my views arn't set in stone if you saw any of the threads I was completely jacked for IPL and I was loving the stream every moment until TB came on.
"tiny minority"? did you even look at the viewer counts for tonight? NASL was 5k less then IPL at the start but at the end it was less then 1k away from each other.
Even day9 said that he enjoyed his trolls and hes a god among us whats wrong with you? I'm saying my opinion you don't have to attack me because of that.
I'm not attacking you, I'm not entirely sure why you're taking offence. Your opinion is not immune from criticism, nor is anyone elses.
I thought IPL did a good job of creating a very accessible stream, that many will want to tune in to and, regardless of experience, be able to follow along. However, I feel as many others do that neither the games nor the commentary were as high-quality as the games on NASL.
I had both streams running simultaneously but was mostly listening to the audio for the NASL. I'm not going to bash casters, because casters tend to be an acquired taste (especially if you've been spoiled by Tastosis for months) but I favored the NASL casters over the IPL. I think Wheat is a fantastic caster but he is best paired with a Day9 or a Chill.
You have to have a caster with the analysis hat on and a caster with the play-by-play hat on. It's just the best balance and provides the best experience for the listeners. Keep it up though IPL, only bigger and better things can come from this.
Well, I will say that being spoiled of the results before the tournament even starts sucks. Especially when it's on twitter of all places ><. Hope that doesn't happen for the next tournament.
if you examine the casters that the IPL has avaliable, they cover all the required bases for the community, just seperately. HD and TB clearly knowing less in-depth knowledge about the game are more suited to bringing in the newcomers to SC with exciting play-by-play, while people like Painuser (and wheat to some degree ) have the deeper knowledge of the game. I personally have loved all the casting so far today ( being a Brit myself TB ftw ! ), but certainly agree that for many of the high level die hard players, there could be a lack of depth to some of the solo-casters.
possibly making casting combos could solve the issue, but again its a minor issue.... and might create a bigger problem with casters not being in synch with each others styles.
Still max props to the IGN for 100% delivering what they promised. They have, as many people have previously stated set the bar for the production levels of tournements
While I personally dont tune in to the NASL regularly, it doesnt mean we all need to start ripping on it because its had a questionable first week, all these tourneys are furthering SC2 as an e-sport, and just because one is initially more professional than the other, doesnt mean we need to tear into the NASL like a pack of hyenas, give them time and im sure they will try match the IPLs dedication to detail and smoothness.
I find this phrase really obnoxious. Am I alone in that?
it does seem a little obnoxious, but let's be honest here. i watched the first day of IPL and you casted like you were selling starcraft 2 to a bunch of console gamers. i don't have an issue with that because you're bringing a bunch of people into esports but at the same time alienating those of us that really love it enough to stay up till 4 am watching live GSL - the "true fans"
Not really. Some of you are alienated, but not all. The noisy few will always come out in opposition of play-by-play casting, but it's the silent majority that are more important. Every caster alienates somebody, it's not worth worrying about and in this case, the IPL was not aimed squarely at TL's demographic anyway, yet still managed to attract and SUSTAIN a significant viewer count from them, so that alone is proof the concept is worth pursuing.
The negativity really is rather depressing if ya take it too seriously and it seems some people are more interesting in tearing down the efforts of others all in the name of 'true fandom'. A true fan would celebrate anything that moves eSports forward, I would think.
I agree with total biscuit 100%, this kind of league put by IGN is the perfect way to introduce people to sc2 and it's entertaining to listen to. There are plenty of videos with game commentary as opposed to casting, but a tournament is supposed to be about hype and excitement. We can analyze the games later. Watch the MLB, during the season the commentators discuss the game, but the cast always needs someone to bring excitement. Once the world series hits, most of the commentating goes away and it's pure casting because people want to watch something exciting. The majority of people watching are not hardcore players, just ask day9. Good job total biscuit
I don't know about anyone else, but I watch Starcraft to be entertained and because it's fun. I like TotalBiscuit because he is an entertaining caster, I don't care how analytical he is. If I want to analyze a game, I'll watch the vods and ignore the commentary, or I will watch replays of the players.
On April 22 2011 12:55 zerglingsfolife wrote: Well, I will say that being spoiled of the results before the tournament even starts sucks. Especially when it's on twitter of all places ><. Hope that doesn't happen for the next tournament.
I'm sure it wont happen again. I thought the stream was great, but they should put a few intermissions because the pacing was sort of fast.
On April 22 2011 12:51 sermokala wrote: my views arn't set in stone if you saw any of the threads I was completely jacked for IPL and I was loving the stream every moment until TB came on.
"tiny minority"? did you even look at the viewer counts for tonight? NASL was 5k less then IPL at the start but at the end it was less then 1k away from each other.
Even day9 said that he enjoyed his trolls and hes a god among us whats wrong with you? I'm saying my opinion you don't have to attack me because of that.
I'm not attacking you, I'm not entirely sure why you're taking offence. Your opinion is not immune from criticism, nor is anyone elses.
TB don't waste your breath on haters. can't please everyone but you sure do please MOST everyone.
On April 22 2011 12:51 sermokala wrote: my views arn't set in stone if you saw any of the threads I was completely jacked for IPL and I was loving the stream every moment until TB came on.
"tiny minority"? did you even look at the viewer counts for tonight? NASL was 5k less then IPL at the start but at the end it was less then 1k away from each other.
Even day9 said that he enjoyed his trolls and hes a god among us whats wrong with you? I'm saying my opinion you don't have to attack me because of that.
I'm not attacking you, I'm not entirely sure why you're taking offence. Your opinion is not immune from criticism, nor is anyone elses.
you called me out for saying some critiism's about the stream while everyones been blindly loveing it and said and I quote
"I love these so called 'true fans' of eSports taking a dump on everything they possibly can while contributing nothing of their own to the scene they supposedly live and breath. Thank God they are only a tiny vocal minority or eSports would be in real trouble." I shouldn't take offence to that?
(btw just clarifying are you the real tb or just a person with his account name? would feel very bad if I insulted TB himself as I do respect him for having such success as hes had)
I find this phrase really obnoxious. Am I alone in that?
it does seem a little obnoxious, but let's be honest here. i watched the first day of IPL and you casted like you were selling starcraft 2 to a bunch of console gamers. i don't have an issue with that because you're bringing a bunch of people into esports but at the same time alienating those of us that really love it enough to stay up till 4 am watching live GSL - the "true fans"
Not really. Some of you are alienated, but not all. The noisy few will always come out in opposition of play-by-play casting, but it's the silent majority that are more important. Every caster alienates somebody, it's not worth worrying about and in this case, the IPL was not aimed squarely at TL's demographic anyway, yet still managed to attract and SUSTAIN a significant viewer count from them, so that alone is proof the concept is worth pursuing.
The negativity really is rather depressing if ya take it too seriously and it seems some people are more interesting in tearing down the efforts of others all in the name of 'true fandom'. A true fan would celebrate anything that moves eSports forward, I would think.
The 'silent majority' argument in anything is rather silly. Theres plenty of silent people on either side of this argument. I wouldn't be so quick to just say 'im not worried about alienating hardcore fanbase' in this situation. I think the people here are saying that you can have the casual viewer ship like you do on youtube and STILL maintain the 'hardcore' fan base. Just look at day9. He is so respected and highly thought of in the 'hardcore' fan base yet he brought in SO many new people on his own. a TON! I really think you are going about it slightly wrong by targeting the uneducated audience. Simply because you CAN cater to the hardcore fan base and still bring in new blood if you do it right. but if you simply cater to the new fan base and try to retain hardcore viewers you really don't do justice to the players and the prestige of the game itself.
On April 22 2011 12:07 Highways wrote: I completely agree, unbelievable production values.
IPL and NASL need to merge because the NASL production is sooo terrible.
How can NASL improve the IPL?
good players good casters good matches?
players granted, but the rest is to debate. I really hope NASL did watch with pen and paper in hand what IGN delivered today and start going to improve their stuff. There needs to be competition, and right now IPL just walks over NASL.
but all of NASL's problems are technical all of IPL's are fundamental.
more then one caster? gretorp getting better every night inc is a legit player thats actually playing well in the league. Diggity coming in and doing well. and kalador who is a very very good. TB is a horrid caster that got on my nerves in a single game.
Yesterday I watched 3 games of Sheth vs rainbow godlike 40+ games in each one. They where better then anything that IPL had today. poorly done 4 gate rush after poorly done 4 gate rush does not a good stream make.
and if tomarrow somehow they fix the stream and it isn't total shit whos a lot better? hell even MLG's going to have a great stream next event.
the gloss is going to come off the IPL and people are gona start seeing that. It looks fucking amazing but that can only go so far
While I don't see a reason to be impressed by the IPLs production quality, I don't see how you can't see this league as a great thing.
Honestly, the production quality of the IPL is almost the minimum requirement for a high-level tournament or league stream. If online communities can put on a show of that quality, a professional organization has no excuse not to.
The IPL can learn from certain points of the NASL, having multiple casters would be a great start, but there is no reason not to expect improvement. Who knows how IGN is going to expand upon this first season, what changes they will make? all we know is that if people like the production they put on now, they'll get a lot more money in the future.
In this case, production value is more important in the long run. We need to know that these guys can make games look good and can attract the casual fans. As much as "true fans" have driven this sport forward, it will be successful off the back of the casual fan.
In the end, if the IPL draws more money, they will get better players and we will see matches comparable to the NASL lineup.
I find this phrase really obnoxious. Am I alone in that?
it does seem a little obnoxious, but let's be honest here. i watched the first day of IPL and you casted like you were selling starcraft 2 to a bunch of console gamers. i don't have an issue with that because you're bringing a bunch of people into esports but at the same time alienating those of us that really love it enough to stay up till 4 am watching live GSL - the "true fans"
Not really. Some of you are alienated, but not all. The noisy few will always come out in opposition of play-by-play casting, but it's the silent majority that are more important. Every caster alienates somebody, it's not worth worrying about and in this case, the IPL was not aimed squarely at TL's demographic anyway, yet still managed to attract and SUSTAIN a significant viewer count from them, so that alone is proof the concept is worth pursuing.
The negativity really is rather depressing if ya take it too seriously and it seems some people are more interesting in tearing down the efforts of others all in the name of 'true fandom'. A true fan would celebrate anything that moves eSports forward, I would think.
I agree with total biscuit 100%, this kind of league put by IGN is the perfect way to introduce people to sc2 and it's entertaining to listen to. There are plenty of videos with game commentary as opposed to casting, but a tournament is supposed to be about hype and excitement. We can analyze the games later. Watch the MLB, during the season the commentators discuss the game, but the cast always needs someone to bring excitement. Once the world series hits, most of the commentating goes away and it's pure casting because people want to watch something exciting. The majority of people watching are not hardcore players, just ask day9. Good job total biscuit
mmmnmmmnmm I'm getting this werid feeling like we're getting into the same debate of husky vs day9 which really makes me :/ because I like husky and I feel like I'm going against him.
About the casters/game quality, the reason that events like the NCAA March Madness is successful is not necessarily because the skill level is the highest (the NBA players are far better, and even the worst NBA players would start for most of the teams in the NCAA tournament) or because the analysts are good, though I appreciate the likes of Clark Kellogg for what they are. It succeeds because the games are exciting and because the play-by-play casters really bring them to life. It's why people will talk more about the Gus Johnsons and even Jim Nantzes more than the Kelloggs and the Reggie Millers of the casting world. They make even the bad games of the tournament at least fun or bearable to watch.
While the IPL's games tonight weren't the best, the casters really did a great job. The production level made everything else look good, which helped bolster the games. I mean, look at the NASL. The games have been better so far, but people don't rave about those because the first week's production was bad and the casters weren't nearly as exciting. I loved TB and Wheat's casting, and I look forward to seeing the IPL.
Caster lineup leans towards the casual crowd WAY too much IMO. Probably my only complaint. However, considering how important casting is to a league, quite a big one.
Does anyone else think the two can serve completely different roles?
I had three streams open tonight and I feel I can put them into three distinct categories.
The first was the day9 daily, it was a fantastic thorough analysis of a game that Sheth played (of great interest to me as I am a zerg player) that talked about max army decision making.
The second was the NASL, which, while being more focused on games, I still learn a lot during. I personally think Gretorp has amazing game knowledge and I feel I can learn a ton from his conversations with InControl about decisions the players are making.
The third was obviously the IPL. This was fantastic because I could just sit back half pay attention and listen to DjWheat go crazy as Catz proxy hatches, or laugh hysterically as TB goes on a ridiculous tangent.
My point is that in order to reap the full benefits of day9 (not counting mondays obviously) it requires a lot of focus from me, which sometimes isn't a real possibility after a long day of work. IPL on the other hand I'm not expecting to learn anything so it's something I would feel more comfortable just throwing on as I wind down for the night. NASL serves at somewhere in between.
Obviously these my personal feelings but I just thought I'd ask if anyone else had similar opinions. Also, this doesn't take into account things like production quality, in which IPL is obviously way ahead. I feel like that's not that big of a deal though as NASL will eventually get it together. Then's there's the fact that some matches I'm just more generally interested in ( ZvX as opposed to PVP for example) and that can be a factor too.
So, long story short, I think they can very easily coexist, as long as NASL steps up in the production quality department (like I expect them to).
TB/DJ Wheat don't need to cast with the any in-depth analysis, hell, Khaldaor was casting in German during one of the Dreamhacks and stole like 60% of the viewers from the English stream. As long as the casters aren't trying to do something they aren't capable of doing, then people will enjoy it.
In-depth analysis is a tricky thing, if you haven't been following/playing this game for a long time then don't bother trying, the worst things you can do in commentating is saying something that is blatantly wrong, when that happens people notice and it pulls them away from the game.
As long NASL can fix up their video/sound issues + Gretorp/InControl get more experience with their casting, then the league will have a great future.
People trying to pit one league against another aren't achieving anything. Enjoy both leagues. IPL has greater production due to much greater preparation before they air and NASL is an on going league with 50 of the best players in the world casting games that have only happened a day or two before with high level analysis.
I guess I just watch these streams for the actual games rather than how amazing the casting is or pretty the graphics are, those always come second in my eyes (unless they are super awful, but neither IPL or NASL are doing anything terribly )
I do not see why people are arguing against the way someone is casting. I personally thought that it was great to include brief blurbs that target a more "uneducated audience." I do not see why that would turn "hardcore esports fans" away from IPL. IPL has AMAZING production value and is not targeted towards the most "hardcore, professional" players in the world as TB stated.
Not every league with over $50 in prizes has to be 100% catered to hardcore players, get over it. TB did a absolutely phenomenal job, as well as Wheat, in being able to bridge the knowledge gap into bringing more potential players and viewers into the scene and if that causes people to stop watching IPL, so be it. People need to lighten up. Hardcore players mainly watch the games, newcomers need advice and that is sometimes what casters can help with for 20 seconds per game.
Good work IPL, awesome casting TB and Wheat. Have not listened in on a lot of games casted by you yet TB and will definitely start tuning in more in the future.
I find this phrase really obnoxious. Am I alone in that?
it does seem a little obnoxious, but let's be honest here. i watched the first day of IPL and you casted like you were selling starcraft 2 to a bunch of console gamers. i don't have an issue with that because you're bringing a bunch of people into esports but at the same time alienating those of us that really love it enough to stay up till 4 am watching live GSL - the "true fans"
Not really. Some of you are alienated, but not all. The noisy few will always come out in opposition of play-by-play casting, but it's the silent majority that are more important. Every caster alienates somebody, it's not worth worrying about and in this case, the IPL was not aimed squarely at TL's demographic anyway, yet still managed to attract and SUSTAIN a significant viewer count from them, so that alone is proof the concept is worth pursuing.
The negativity really is rather depressing if ya take it too seriously and it seems some people are more interesting in tearing down the efforts of others all in the name of 'true fandom'. A true fan would celebrate anything that moves eSports forward, I would think.
I agree with total biscuit 100%, this kind of league put by IGN is the perfect way to introduce people to sc2 and it's entertaining to listen to. There are plenty of videos with game commentary as opposed to casting, but a tournament is supposed to be about hype and excitement. We can analyze the games later. Watch the MLB, during the season the commentators discuss the game, but the cast always needs someone to bring excitement. Once the world series hits, most of the commentating goes away and it's pure casting because people want to watch something exciting. The majority of people watching are not hardcore players, just ask day9. Good job total biscuit
mmmnmmmnmm I'm getting this werid feeling like we're getting into the same debate of husky vs day9 which really makes me :/ because I like husky and I feel like I'm going against him.
just like the day9 vs husky debate, you can still be in both camps. everyone will however find a preference for one or the either.
IPL is seemingly being presented merely as training wheels for real SC2. zero analysis, no player thoughts after games, just lots of 'violence' and graphical fluff with very little focus on strategy or tactics. IGN is clearly focusing on a different demographic that will hopefully funnel a ton of people into the scene the same way husky did. strictly judging after today, i would rather watch NASL for the most part.
On April 22 2011 12:07 Highways wrote: I completely agree, unbelievable production values.
IPL and NASL need to merge because the NASL production is sooo terrible.
How can NASL improve the IPL?
good players good casters good matches?
players granted, but the rest is to debate. I really hope NASL did watch with pen and paper in hand what IGN delivered today and start going to improve their stuff. There needs to be competition, and right now IPL just walks over NASL.
but all of NASL's problems are technical all of IPL's are fundamental.
more then one caster? gretorp getting better every night inc is a legit player thats actually playing well in the league. Diggity coming in and doing well. and kalador who is a very very good. TB is a horrid caster that got on my nerves in a single game.
Yesterday I watched 3 games of Sheth vs rainbow godlike 40+ games in each one. They where better then anything that IPL had today. poorly done 4 gate rush after poorly done 4 gate rush does not a good stream make.
and if tomarrow somehow they fix the stream and it isn't total shit whos a lot better? hell even MLG's going to have a great stream next event.
the gloss is going to come off the IPL and people are gona start seeing that. It looks fucking amazing but that can only go so far
IPL's problems are fundamental? lmao
I myself think casting is best done as a duo, but with that said, the solo casting today was quite decent and still passable at worst. The casting in NASL has it's own issues, the casting in the IPL has some of it's own. I would say that neither are really a deal breaker though I personally like casting in well rounded pairs.
Yesterday, I watched 3 games of Sheth vs Rainbow as well and was fucking facepalming waiting for those games to end. The only reason they went on that long were because Sheth kept going fucking Ultralisks and Zerglings against a 19 tank strong siege line when he could have won the game with Broodlords. Then he went Broodlords consistently when there were already Vikings out... Everyone in chat was kind of annoyed because a simple tech switch would have ended the game...
After the first 40 minute game, do you remember the reaction of the casters? It wasn't, "OH MY GOD, what an amazing macro game we just witnessed, that was astounding what play"... It was more like, "Oh... that games was-", "Yeah... that was long".
The quality of games right now is slightly better in the NASL but as we get deeper into these brackets we'll have much better games I'm sure, there were some really solid games today as well.
If they fixed their stream tomorrow, I'd still say the IPL is better because of the quality of production and the amount of content we're getting for free at the quality we're getting it.
On April 22 2011 12:07 Highways wrote: I completely agree, unbelievable production values.
IPL and NASL need to merge because the NASL production is sooo terrible.
How can NASL improve the IPL?
good players good casters good matches?
players granted, but the rest is to debate. I really hope NASL did watch with pen and paper in hand what IGN delivered today and start going to improve their stuff. There needs to be competition, and right now IPL just walks over NASL.
but all of NASL's problems are technical all of IPL's are fundamental.
more then one caster? gretorp getting better every night inc is a legit player thats actually playing well in the league. Diggity coming in and doing well. and kalador who is a very very good. TB is a horrid caster that got on my nerves in a single game.
Yesterday I watched 3 games of Sheth vs rainbow godlike 40+ games in each one. They where better then anything that IPL had today. poorly done 4 gate rush after poorly done 4 gate rush does not a good stream make.
and if tomarrow somehow they fix the stream and it isn't total shit whos a lot better? hell even MLG's going to have a great stream next event.
the gloss is going to come off the IPL and people are gona start seeing that. It looks fucking amazing but that can only go so far
While I don't see a reason to be impressed by the IPLs production quality, I don't see how you can't see this league as a great thing.
Honestly, the production quality of the IPL is almost the minimum requirement for a high-level tournament or league stream. If online communities can put on a show of that quality, a professional organization has no excuse not to.
The IPL can learn from certain points of the NASL, having multiple casters would be a great start, but there is no reason not to expect improvement. Who knows how IGN is going to expand upon this first season, what changes they will make? all we know is that if people like the production they put on now, they'll get a lot more money in the future.
In this case, production value is more important in the long run. We need to know that these guys can make games look good and can attract the casual fans. As much as "true fans" have driven this sport forward, it will be successful off the back of the casual fan.
In the end, if the IPL draws more money, they will get better players and we will see matches comparable to the NASL lineup.
Well the IPL has 150k for prizes this year at the minimum. I think they need to open it up to at least european players, the lag from Europe to the US isn't bad, and when you have White-ra,Demuslim,TLO, RET, ect on top of Idra, Incontrol, Catz, and Kiwikaki then you have a pretty damn amazing lineup. I think they said the qualifier will be open on top of the top4 from this tourney getting auto invites.
On April 22 2011 10:17 Whiplash wrote: I tuned in to watch it and was instantly impressed. The production quality is INCREDIBLE. This is what the NASL should have been.
IGN/WP people, I thought you did an excellent job through and through, besides the map/spoiler issue.
Things I think need adjusting: 1. Co-casters are needed. I'm a huge fan of both TB and Wheat, but I think they would both be improved by co-casters. Not only would it help them set a better pace, but it's also very difficult to keep up with the entire map with just one person.
2. The Stats screen is pretty useless. The minimap and APM are nice, but there's no point to the other three stats and they show very little correlation to what happened in the game. I know this is the fault of Blizzard because the numbers are just borrowed from their recap, but still, an all-encompassing Resources number doesn't provide any useful information.
On April 22 2011 10:21 Lumin wrote: Just turned off NASL and turned on this league.
same lol, I was going to force myself to watch nasl but I saw this other IPL thingy on the TL stream page...I click it and my life is changed.
lol same, and i am an nasl subscriber :O, it just doesnt interest me there are too many mistakes and the quality of everything in the IPL is just way better than NASL ><
i wish it werent true because NASL has great players but the quality is poopy and gives me a headache even as a subscriber watching 1080p, 15 frames per second fail encoding FTL. Its 15 fps for everyone i find it funny the people that say the NASL stream is great/fine clearly they know nothing about video quality, i dont like to play my games at 15 fps, and i sure as hell dont want to watch games that i payed for at that framerate either =/
GO IPL you guys did a fantastic job today, very entertaining
On April 22 2011 12:07 Highways wrote: I completely agree, unbelievable production values.
IPL and NASL need to merge because the NASL production is sooo terrible.
How can NASL improve the IPL?
good players good casters good matches?
players granted, but the rest is to debate. I really hope NASL did watch with pen and paper in hand what IGN delivered today and start going to improve their stuff. There needs to be competition, and right now IPL just walks over NASL.
but all of NASL's problems are technical all of IPL's are fundamental.
more then one caster? gretorp getting better every night inc is a legit player thats actually playing well in the league. Diggity coming in and doing well. and kalador who is a very very good. TB is a horrid caster that got on my nerves in a single game.
Yesterday I watched 3 games of Sheth vs rainbow godlike 40+ games in each one. They where better then anything that IPL had today. poorly done 4 gate rush after poorly done 4 gate rush does not a good stream make.
and if tomarrow somehow they fix the stream and it isn't total shit whos a lot better? hell even MLG's going to have a great stream next event.
the gloss is going to come off the IPL and people are gona start seeing that. It looks fucking amazing but that can only go so far
IPL's problems are fundamental? lmao
I myself think casting is best done as a duo, but with that said, the solo casting today was quite decent and still passable at worst. The casting in NASL has it's own issues, the casting in the IPL has some of it's own. I would say that neither are really a deal breaker though I personally like casting in well rounded pairs.
Yesterday, I watched 3 games of Sheth vs Rainbow as well and was fucking facepalming waiting for those games to end. The only reason they went on that long were because Sheth kept going fucking Ultralisks and Zerglings against a 19 tank strong siege line when he could have won the game with Broodlords. Then he went Broodlords consistently when there were already Vikings out... Everyone in chat was kind of annoyed because a simple tech switch would have ended the game...
After the first 40 minute game, do you remember the reaction of the casters? It wasn't, "OH MY GOD, what an amazing macro game we just witnessed, that was astounding what play"... It was more like, "Oh... that games was-", "Yeah... that was long".
The quality of games right now is slightly better in the NASL but as we get deeper into these brackets we'll have much better games I'm sure, there were some really solid games today as well.
If they fixed their stream tomorrow, I'd still say the IPL is better because of the quality of production and the amount of content we're getting for free at the quality we're getting it.
That's entirely the problem. You are valuing production quality way more than the quality and significance of the games. When it comes down to it. Right now, NASL players are better and competing in something more meaningful at the moment. Now if IPL gets better players in a bigger league then this will be exciting!! But acting like IPL today was better than NASL in any way except production I would argue is entirely wrong..
IGN has done a great job to give us an amazing first night of action for their new league. Definitely going to be something I'm looking forward to and good luck with keeping things rolling as the league continues!
I find this phrase really obnoxious. Am I alone in that?
it does seem a little obnoxious, but let's be honest here. i watched the first day of IPL and you casted like you were selling starcraft 2 to a bunch of console gamers. i don't have an issue with that because you're bringing a bunch of people into esports but at the same time alienating those of us that really love it enough to stay up till 4 am watching live GSL - the "true fans"
Not really. Some of you are alienated, but not all. The noisy few will always come out in opposition of play-by-play casting, but it's the silent majority that are more important. Every caster alienates somebody, it's not worth worrying about and in this case, the IPL was not aimed squarely at TL's demographic anyway, yet still managed to attract and SUSTAIN a significant viewer count from them, so that alone is proof the concept is worth pursuing.
The negativity really is rather depressing if ya take it too seriously and it seems some people are more interesting in tearing down the efforts of others all in the name of 'true fandom'. A true fan would celebrate anything that moves eSports forward, I would think.
I agree with total biscuit 100%, this kind of league put by IGN is the perfect way to introduce people to sc2 and it's entertaining to listen to. There are plenty of videos with game commentary as opposed to casting, but a tournament is supposed to be about hype and excitement. We can analyze the games later. Watch the MLB, during the season the commentators discuss the game, but the cast always needs someone to bring excitement. Once the world series hits, most of the commentating goes away and it's pure casting because people want to watch something exciting. The majority of people watching are not hardcore players, just ask day9. Good job total biscuit
mmmnmmmnmm I'm getting this werid feeling like we're getting into the same debate of husky vs day9 which really makes me :/ because I like husky and I feel like I'm going against him.
just like the day9 vs husky debate, you can still be in both camps. everyone will however find a preference for one or the either.
IPL is seemingly being presented merely as training wheels for real SC2. zero analysis, no player thoughts after games, just lots of 'violence' and graphical fluff with very little focus on strategy or tactics. IGN is clearly focusing on a different demographic that will hopefully funnel a ton of people into the scene the same way husky did. strictly judging after today, i would rather watch NASL for the most part.
I prefer NASL as well, simply because of the caliber of play. I think the NASL will really start to heat up as the players compete for the first and second seeds and enter "must-win" situations.
But I have to admit, there's a lot of little things that the IPL is doing well that the NASL should pick up on.
On April 22 2011 12:07 Highways wrote: I completely agree, unbelievable production values.
IPL and NASL need to merge because the NASL production is sooo terrible.
How can NASL improve the IPL?
good players good casters good matches?
players granted, but the rest is to debate. I really hope NASL did watch with pen and paper in hand what IGN delivered today and start going to improve their stuff. There needs to be competition, and right now IPL just walks over NASL.
but all of NASL's problems are technical all of IPL's are fundamental.
more then one caster? gretorp getting better every night inc is a legit player thats actually playing well in the league. Diggity coming in and doing well. and kalador who is a very very good. TB is a horrid caster that got on my nerves in a single game.
Yesterday I watched 3 games of Sheth vs rainbow godlike 40+ games in each one. They where better then anything that IPL had today. poorly done 4 gate rush after poorly done 4 gate rush does not a good stream make.
and if tomarrow somehow they fix the stream and it isn't total shit whos a lot better? hell even MLG's going to have a great stream next event.
the gloss is going to come off the IPL and people are gona start seeing that. It looks fucking amazing but that can only go so far
IPL's problems are fundamental? lmao
I myself think casting is best done as a duo, but with that said, the solo casting today was quite decent and still passable at worst. The casting in NASL has it's own issues, the casting in the IPL has some of it's own. I would say that neither are really a deal breaker though I personally like casting in well rounded pairs.
Yesterday, I watched 3 games of Sheth vs Rainbow as well and was fucking facepalming waiting for those games to end. The only reason they went on that long were because Sheth kept going fucking Ultralisks and Zerglings against a 19 tank strong siege line when he could have won the game with Broodlords. Then he went Broodlords consistently when there were already Vikings out... Everyone in chat was kind of annoyed because a simple tech switch would have ended the game...
After the first 40 minute game, do you remember the reaction of the casters? It wasn't, "OH MY GOD, what an amazing macro game we just witnessed, that was astounding what play"... It was more like, "Oh... that games was-", "Yeah... that was long".
The quality of games right now is slightly better in the NASL but as we get deeper into these brackets we'll have much better games I'm sure, there were some really solid games today as well.
If they fixed their stream tomorrow, I'd still say the IPL is better because of the quality of production and the amount of content we're getting for free at the quality we're getting it.
Yea i was face palming pretty hard during 2 out of 3 of those games ,the third one just made me feel sorry for rainbow because the lag was so bad, all in all not a great series, i dont know what this guy is talking about but clearly hes never watched the GSL before and seen a truely epic high quality series, like the Boxer vs avenge, that was pretty sickk, or MKP vs Nada yesterday also incredibly sick
Having two leagues like NASL and IPL legitimizes the idea of a North American Star League, and can only be good for both leagues.
The competition between the two will help both improve. NASL will get better production quality, a more exciting backdrop, and better sound/video. IPL will get better players, better casting (dual casters are a must) and more interesting games.
There's no reason to think that they can't coexist. The MSL and OSL have both been successful in Korea for many years.
In the end, it's us, the fans, who benefit the most.
On April 22 2011 12:07 Highways wrote: I completely agree, unbelievable production values.
IPL and NASL need to merge because the NASL production is sooo terrible.
How can NASL improve the IPL?
good players good casters good matches?
players granted, but the rest is to debate. I really hope NASL did watch with pen and paper in hand what IGN delivered today and start going to improve their stuff. There needs to be competition, and right now IPL just walks over NASL.
but all of NASL's problems are technical all of IPL's are fundamental.
more then one caster? gretorp getting better every night inc is a legit player thats actually playing well in the league. Diggity coming in and doing well. and kalador who is a very very good. TB is a horrid caster that got on my nerves in a single game.
Yesterday I watched 3 games of Sheth vs rainbow godlike 40+ games in each one. They where better then anything that IPL had today. poorly done 4 gate rush after poorly done 4 gate rush does not a good stream make.
and if tomarrow somehow they fix the stream and it isn't total shit whos a lot better? hell even MLG's going to have a great stream next event.
the gloss is going to come off the IPL and people are gona start seeing that. It looks fucking amazing but that can only go so far
IPL's problems are fundamental? lmao
I myself think casting is best done as a duo, but with that said, the solo casting today was quite decent and still passable at worst. The casting in NASL has it's own issues, the casting in the IPL has some of it's own. I would say that neither are really a deal breaker though I personally like casting in well rounded pairs.
Yesterday, I watched 3 games of Sheth vs Rainbow as well and was fucking facepalming waiting for those games to end. The only reason they went on that long were because Sheth kept going fucking Ultralisks and Zerglings against a 19 tank strong siege line when he could have won the game with Broodlords. Then he went Broodlords consistently when there were already Vikings out... Everyone in chat was kind of annoyed because a simple tech switch would have ended the game...
After the first 40 minute game, do you remember the reaction of the casters? It wasn't, "OH MY GOD, what an amazing macro game we just witnessed, that was astounding what play"... It was more like, "Oh... that games was-", "Yeah... that was long".
The quality of games right now is slightly better in the NASL but as we get deeper into these brackets we'll have much better games I'm sure, there were some really solid games today as well.
If they fixed their stream tomorrow, I'd still say the IPL is better because of the quality of production and the amount of content we're getting for free at the quality we're getting it.
That's entirely the problem. You are valuing production quality way more than the quality and significance of the games. When it comes down to it. Right now, NASL players are better and competing in something more meaningful at the moment. Now if IPL gets better players in a bigger league then this will be exciting!! But acting like IPL today was better than NASL in any way except production I would argue is entirely wrong..
You realize that all but a couple of the players from the IPL aren't in the NASL right? The quality of play from players can vary from day to day and game to game, there have been some pretty boring days in the NASL, to be honest, if you asked me for some stand out good games, I'd name a few but I could name one or two that were pretty exciting today as well.
Yes, it would be cool to see some of the big names from the NASL in the IPL and I'm hoping we'll see that in the actual launch as opposed to the seeded test run. But as of now, the player list is hardly a deal breaker, considering almost all of them are also in the NASL.
On April 22 2011 13:17 Jeremy Reimer wrote: Having two leagues like NASL and IPL legitimizes the idea of a North American Star League, and can only be good for both leagues.
The competition between the two will help both improve. NASL will get better production quality, a more exciting backdrop, and better sound/video. IPL will get better players, better casting (dual casters are a must) and more interesting games.
There's no reason to think that they can't coexist. The MSL and OSL have both been successful in Korea for many years.
In the end, it's us, the fans, who benefit the most.
This.
Despite what some might think, the people behind NASL and the people behind IPL are not mortal enemies doomed to fight each other to the death. The SC2 scene, as it is, is pretty small. Most influential members of the community know most other similar members either personally, or through one connection. This isn't two sides of a war for SC2 supremacy. This is a group of very dedicated, very determined and very enthusiastic players and organizers who not only want the best for their own products, but also the best for others.
Only, their opinion might differ on how to best bring out that product. But that's the nature of competition, and competition is something that shouldn't be warded away.
StarCraft II needs an ecosystem of tournaments, leagues, and players of all ages and generations. And the IPL and NASL are the first steps of the road towards obtaining the kind of self-perpetuating ecosystem that the scene needs to be a viable, long term bastion of professional esports.
I find this phrase really obnoxious. Am I alone in that?
it does seem a little obnoxious, but let's be honest here. i watched the first day of IPL and you casted like you were selling starcraft 2 to a bunch of console gamers. i don't have an issue with that because you're bringing a bunch of people into esports but at the same time alienating those of us that really love it enough to stay up till 4 am watching live GSL - the "true fans"
Not really. Some of you are alienated, but not all. The noisy few will always come out in opposition of play-by-play casting, but it's the silent majority that are more important. Every caster alienates somebody, it's not worth worrying about and in this case, the IPL was not aimed squarely at TL's demographic anyway, yet still managed to attract and SUSTAIN a significant viewer count from them, so that alone is proof the concept is worth pursuing.
The negativity really is rather depressing if ya take it too seriously and it seems some people are more interesting in tearing down the efforts of others all in the name of 'true fandom'. A true fan would celebrate anything that moves eSports forward, I would think.
I agree with total biscuit 100%, this kind of league put by IGN is the perfect way to introduce people to sc2 and it's entertaining to listen to. There are plenty of videos with game commentary as opposed to casting, but a tournament is supposed to be about hype and excitement. We can analyze the games later. Watch the MLB, during the season the commentators discuss the game, but the cast always needs someone to bring excitement. Once the world series hits, most of the commentating goes away and it's pure casting because people want to watch something exciting. The majority of people watching are not hardcore players, just ask day9. Good job total biscuit
mmmnmmmnmm I'm getting this werid feeling like we're getting into the same debate of husky vs day9 which really makes me :/ because I like husky and I feel like I'm going against him.
just like the day9 vs husky debate, you can still be in both camps. everyone will however find a preference for one or the either.
IPL is seemingly being presented merely as training wheels for real SC2. zero analysis, no player thoughts after games, just lots of 'violence' and graphical fluff with very little focus on strategy or tactics. IGN is clearly focusing on a different demographic that will hopefully funnel a ton of people into the scene the same way husky did. strictly judging after today, i would rather watch NASL for the most part.
I prefer NASL as well, simply because of the caliber of play. I think the NASL will really start to heat up as the players compete for the first and second seeds and enter "must-win" situations.
But I have to admit, there's a lot of little things that the IPL is doing well that the NASL should pick up on.
Good production is all about the details.
keep in mind that these games were played long ago in order to give the production team enough time to create these pretty overlays and the consequence is that the results are leaked and the entire league spoiled. i wouldn't dare open the JTV chat while watching if i bother to even keep watching.
NASL has technical issues that will be ironed out over time but it is a fully functioning league that the purists can get behind and support. i really want it to succeed because they have the right formula when it comes to esports.
On April 22 2011 10:12 Zerker wrote: This thread is dedicated to how good IGN pro league stream is. If you have anything to say, negative or positive post it here!
What i noticed at first - Quality is 1080p, Seriuosly it looks like your watching a dvd! - Audio is amazing, Its crisp, sharp, response is good. - Custom artwork for the players, Almost resembles street fighter! - Professional casters that have a lot of experience in the casting field? YES PLEASE.
Leave a comment of your own, why you think this stream / league is amazing or if your disappointed :D
1920 x 1080 = 6 x ( 720 x 480 = DVD ) in size ( resolution ), but that doesn't necessarily determine the quality. Lower Constant Rate Factor = better quality Lossless encode would be even better though
On April 22 2011 13:17 Jeremy Reimer wrote: Having two leagues like NASL and IPL legitimizes the idea of a North American Star League, and can only be good for both leagues.
The competition between the two will help both improve. NASL will get better production quality, a more exciting backdrop, and better sound/video. IPL will get better players, better casting (dual casters are a must) and more interesting games.
There's no reason to think that they can't coexist. The MSL and OSL have both been successful in Korea for many years.
In the end, it's us, the fans, who benefit the most.
This.
Despite what some might think, the people behind NASL and the people behind IPL are not mortal enemies doomed to fight each other to the death. The SC2 scene, as it is, is pretty small. Most influential members of the community know most other similar members either personally, or through one connection. This isn't two sides of a war for SC2 supremacy. This is a group of very dedicated, very determined and very enthusiastic players and organizers who not only want the best for their own products, but also the best for others.
Only, their opinion might differ on how to best bring out that product. But that's the nature of competition, and competition is something that shouldn't be warded away.
StarCraft II needs an ecosystem of tournaments, leagues, and players of all ages and generations. And the IPL and NASL are the first steps of the road towards obtaining the kind of self-perpetuating ecosystem that the scene needs to be a viable, long term bastion of professional esports.
QFT for the both of you. Now if everyone can see this, it would be a HUGE step in the right direction.
As for Korea and the MSL and OSL, if E-Sports in the west continues to grow, I wouldn't be surprised if we have more than just two main Starleagues, maybe we'll have 3, 4,... who knows. the sky's the limit.
Please, don't pit the two leagues against one another.
As for what they could have done better, dual casters is a much if you're going to start a league. That's pretty much my main gripe.
1 - TB and DJW actually drew me into the games, and made them interesting in a way that hasn't happened before. Usually I'm more of a "Oh that was a good play, I wonder what his next move is?" type of spectator, but the casters really got me interested in the outcome of the game! So big props for that.
2 - Loved the production, made everything seem really cohesive. "Felt" like a real sports game that you might find on a sports channel on TV, something I think all leagues should aim for if they want to go mainstream.
Negative
1 - As has been mentioned before, 2 casters might be a better option. However, if the 2nd caster's audio isn't in sync. (ie: done over skype, not live in person), then I feel going with one smooth caster is better. In short: 2 cohesive live casters > 1 caster > 2 casters out of sync/bad audio.
nasl commentating is too awkward for me and the production just seems too amateurish. i'm one to appreciate fluid speech so i prefer djwheat and totalbiscuit over non-professional casting (non-professional as in not trained to be a sportscaster, not unprofessional).
i can see why people would like nasl more, but as far as pulling someone in, IPL does it better. IPL is the hot blonde with big tits and NASL is the nerdy hipster who you could find attractive if you looked hard enough.
On April 22 2011 12:07 Highways wrote: I completely agree, unbelievable production values.
IPL and NASL need to merge because the NASL production is sooo terrible.
How can NASL improve the IPL?
good players good casters good matches?
players granted, but the rest is to debate. I really hope NASL did watch with pen and paper in hand what IGN delivered today and start going to improve their stuff. There needs to be competition, and right now IPL just walks over NASL.
but all of NASL's problems are technical all of IPL's are fundamental.
more then one caster? gretorp getting better every night inc is a legit player thats actually playing well in the league. Diggity coming in and doing well. and kalador who is a very very good. TB is a horrid caster that got on my nerves in a single game.
Yesterday I watched 3 games of Sheth vs rainbow godlike 40+ games in each one. They where better then anything that IPL had today. poorly done 4 gate rush after poorly done 4 gate rush does not a good stream make.
and if tomarrow somehow they fix the stream and it isn't total shit whos a lot better? hell even MLG's going to have a great stream next event.
the gloss is going to come off the IPL and people are gona start seeing that. It looks fucking amazing but that can only go so far
IPL's problems are fundamental? lmao
I myself think casting is best done as a duo, but with that said, the solo casting today was quite decent and still passable at worst. The casting in NASL has it's own issues, the casting in the IPL has some of it's own. I would say that neither are really a deal breaker though I personally like casting in well rounded pairs.
Yesterday, I watched 3 games of Sheth vs Rainbow as well and was fucking facepalming waiting for those games to end. The only reason they went on that long were because Sheth kept going fucking Ultralisks and Zerglings against a 19 tank strong siege line when he could have won the game with Broodlords. Then he went Broodlords consistently when there were already Vikings out... Everyone in chat was kind of annoyed because a simple tech switch would have ended the game...
After the first 40 minute game, do you remember the reaction of the casters? It wasn't, "OH MY GOD, what an amazing macro game we just witnessed, that was astounding what play"... It was more like, "Oh... that games was-", "Yeah... that was long".
The quality of games right now is slightly better in the NASL but as we get deeper into these brackets we'll have much better games I'm sure, there were some really solid games today as well.
If they fixed their stream tomorrow, I'd still say the IPL is better because of the quality of production and the amount of content we're getting for free at the quality we're getting it.
That's entirely the problem. You are valuing production quality way more than the quality and significance of the games. When it comes down to it. Right now, NASL players are better and competing in something more meaningful at the moment. Now if IPL gets better players in a bigger league then this will be exciting!! But acting like IPL today was better than NASL in any way except production I would argue is entirely wrong..
You realize that all but a couple of the players from the IPL aren't in the NASL right? The quality of play from players can vary from day to day and game to game, there have been some pretty boring days in the NASL, to be honest, if you asked me for some stand out good games, I'd name a few but I could name one or two that were pretty exciting today as well.
Yes, it would be cool to see some of the big names from the NASL in the IPL and I'm hoping we'll see that in the actual launch as opposed to the seeded test run. But as of now, the player list is hardly a deal breaker, considering almost all of them are also in the NASL.
I know. Thats why I said things like 'at the moment' and 'right now.' If IPL grows and has just as good of player lineup as NASL that will be awesome. My entire point, however, was while production may seem awesome right now. Its the quality and importance of the games that will really sustain a good league, and thats how it should be.
I enjoy IPL more. NASL does have better players, but I still think the highest competition in the world is still easily GSL, so I don't put much weight in who has the better players. IPL seems to be more on the ball than NASL; no walkovers, better production, and more prepared.
I do like the whole NASL doing a gigantic round robin and making it more like a sports regular season, but that will be a turn off for most people. They will see these matches as less important than any other tournament, and with players seemingly giving walkovers like it's nothing, it just adds to the image that the regular season portion of the tournament is useless.
I'm sure the ending of NASL will be huge and get tons of viewers, but before that, I think the viewer interest might even go down even more.
I find this phrase really obnoxious. Am I alone in that?
it does seem a little obnoxious, but let's be honest here. i watched the first day of IPL and you casted like you were selling starcraft 2 to a bunch of console gamers. i don't have an issue with that because you're bringing a bunch of people into esports but at the same time alienating those of us that really love it enough to stay up till 4 am watching live GSL - the "true fans"
Not really. Some of you are alienated, but not all. The noisy few will always come out in opposition of play-by-play casting, but it's the silent majority that are more important. Every caster alienates somebody, it's not worth worrying about and in this case, the IPL was not aimed squarely at TL's demographic anyway, yet still managed to attract and SUSTAIN a significant viewer count from them, so that alone is proof the concept is worth pursuing.
The negativity really is rather depressing if ya take it too seriously and it seems some people are more interesting in tearing down the efforts of others all in the name of 'true fandom'. A true fan would celebrate anything that moves eSports forward, I would think.
I agree with total biscuit 100%, this kind of league put by IGN is the perfect way to introduce people to sc2 and it's entertaining to listen to. There are plenty of videos with game commentary as opposed to casting, but a tournament is supposed to be about hype and excitement. We can analyze the games later. Watch the MLB, during the season the commentators discuss the game, but the cast always needs someone to bring excitement. Once the world series hits, most of the commentating goes away and it's pure casting because people want to watch something exciting. The majority of people watching are not hardcore players, just ask day9. Good job total biscuit
mmmnmmmnmm I'm getting this werid feeling like we're getting into the same debate of husky vs day9 which really makes me :/ because I like husky and I feel like I'm going against him.
just like the day9 vs husky debate, you can still be in both camps. everyone will however find a preference for one or the either.
IPL is seemingly being presented merely as training wheels for real SC2. zero analysis, no player thoughts after games, just lots of 'violence' and graphical fluff with very little focus on strategy or tactics. IGN is clearly focusing on a different demographic that will hopefully funnel a ton of people into the scene the same way husky did. strictly judging after today, i would rather watch NASL for the most part.
I prefer NASL as well, simply because of the caliber of play. I think the NASL will really start to heat up as the players compete for the first and second seeds and enter "must-win" situations.
But I have to admit, there's a lot of little things that the IPL is doing well that the NASL should pick up on.
Good production is all about the details.
keep in mind that these games were played long ago in order to give the production team enough time to create these pretty overlays and the consequence is that the results are leaked and the entire league spoiled. i wouldn't dare open the JTV chat while watching if i bother to even keep watching.
NASL has technical issues that will be ironed out over time but it is a fully functioning league that the purists can get behind and support. i really want it to succeed because they have the right formula when it comes to esports.
Maybe I have access to different information than you but as a huge starcraft nerd(i loved those qxschool and stik casts and ancient day9 dailies where he never gets excited about anything) I think your complaints about their being fundamental issues with the IPL are more than just a little ridiculous. I'm not that big on the casting but regarding the games or the player pool or the prizes, have you even been paying attention? These were the dudes they could get out to the studio for the production on the test run. There will be actual qualifiers in future seasons which strikes me as something you SHOULD be supporting as a "true fan" because it promotes players who can demonstrably produce results; no subjectivity or guesswork is needed. The NASL system's qualifier system is extremely limited, even for the people it brings in in season 2.
Regarding the spoilers, it's a major issue. This was pointed out to IGN.Alex on SomethingAwful and he had this to say:
"The guest account thing where you can schedule times for the players and then go into the files and edit their names to the correct name is great if you're on the same kind of timetable as the TSL. We're wanting to move a little faster and provide more then 2 days of content a week, so it's harder to work that in. It's absolutely something we considered though, and may revisit that idea in the future. It's without a doubt the most secure way to hide results.
We will likely be using cloaked maps though next time."
On April 22 2011 13:32 Turo wrote: I would just like to add my opinion in here:
Positive
1 - TB and DJW actually drew me into the games, and made them interesting in a way that hasn't happened before. Usually I'm more of a "Oh that was a good play, I wonder what his next move is?" type of spectator, but the casters really got me interested in the outcome of the game! So big props for that.
2 - Loved the production, made everything seem really cohesive. "Felt" like a real sports game that you might find on a sports channel on TV, something I think all leagues should aim for if they want to go mainstream.
Negative
1 - As has been mentioned before, 2 casters might be a better option. However, if the 2nd caster's audio isn't in sync. (ie: done over skype, not live in person), then I feel going with one smooth caster is better. In short: 2 cohesive live casters > 1 caster > 2 casters out of sync/bad audio.
TSL does 2 casters over skype, using a program to make sure that the replays are in sync, so there definatelly is a way to do it, and outside the rare ocasion were the connection of one of them craps out, you can't even notice they aren't in the same house. And even in those ocasions it is fixed quickly.
On April 22 2011 13:32 Turo wrote: I would just like to add my opinion in here:
Positive
1 - TB and DJW actually drew me into the games, and made them interesting in a way that hasn't happened before. Usually I'm more of a "Oh that was a good play, I wonder what his next move is?" type of spectator, but the casters really got me interested in the outcome of the game! So big props for that.
2 - Loved the production, made everything seem really cohesive. "Felt" like a real sports game that you might find on a sports channel on TV, something I think all leagues should aim for if they want to go mainstream.
Negative
1 - As has been mentioned before, 2 casters might be a better option. However, if the 2nd caster's audio isn't in sync. (ie: done over skype, not live in person), then I feel going with one smooth caster is better. In short: 2 cohesive live casters > 1 caster > 2 casters out of sync/bad audio.
TSL does 2 casters over skype, using a program to make sure that the replays are in sync, so there definatelly is a way to do it, and outside the rare ocasion were the connection of one of them craps out, you can't even notice they aren't in the same house. And even in those ocasions it is fixed quickly.
Yep, I'm aware other leagues do it, and so should IGN. Just saying I would rather have 1 caster doing an excellent job, than have 2 casters botching things. =]
One question? How many viewers it will take for IPL 2 to happen?. Is 10,000 viewers to low?. I think they need at least 50,000 to 60,000 live viewers for IPL 2 to happen.
I liked it, and man... so much content. I was flipping back and forth between IPL/NASL to watch the matches I wanted to see on each stream. Pick the ones I missed on the VODs. Between NASL, IPL, GSL and then throw in fairly frequent tournaments. I've been reduced from watching everything that's happening to just following my favourite players.
I find this phrase really obnoxious. Am I alone in that?
it does seem a little obnoxious, but let's be honest here. i watched the first day of IPL and you casted like you were selling starcraft 2 to a bunch of console gamers. i don't have an issue with that because you're bringing a bunch of people into esports but at the same time alienating those of us that really love it enough to stay up till 4 am watching live GSL - the "true fans"
Not really. Some of you are alienated, but not all. The noisy few will always come out in opposition of play-by-play casting, but it's the silent majority that are more important. Every caster alienates somebody, it's not worth worrying about and in this case, the IPL was not aimed squarely at TL's demographic anyway, yet still managed to attract and SUSTAIN a significant viewer count from them, so that alone is proof the concept is worth pursuing.
The negativity really is rather depressing if ya take it too seriously and it seems some people are more interesting in tearing down the efforts of others all in the name of 'true fandom'. A true fan would celebrate anything that moves eSports forward, I would think.
I agree with total biscuit 100%, this kind of league put by IGN is the perfect way to introduce people to sc2 and it's entertaining to listen to. There are plenty of videos with game commentary as opposed to casting, but a tournament is supposed to be about hype and excitement. We can analyze the games later. Watch the MLB, during the season the commentators discuss the game, but the cast always needs someone to bring excitement. Once the world series hits, most of the commentating goes away and it's pure casting because people want to watch something exciting. The majority of people watching are not hardcore players, just ask day9. Good job total biscuit
mmmnmmmnmm I'm getting this werid feeling like we're getting into the same debate of husky vs day9 which really makes me :/ because I like husky and I feel like I'm going against him.
just like the day9 vs husky debate, you can still be in both camps. everyone will however find a preference for one or the either.
IPL is seemingly being presented merely as training wheels for real SC2. zero analysis, no player thoughts after games, just lots of 'violence' and graphical fluff with very little focus on strategy or tactics. IGN is clearly focusing on a different demographic that will hopefully funnel a ton of people into the scene the same way husky did. strictly judging after today, i would rather watch NASL for the most part.
What are you missing? Its NOT training... its ENTERTAINMENT... thats the goal... thats the end-game for a money-making operation. If you want analysis watch the day 9 daily but I assure you that the more competitive crowd doesnt spend much time watching this stuff for analysis. The more "hardcore" crowd is more likely to watch these games for entertainment and not so they can hear their own thoughts being echoed by some caster. Do you honestly a mid-masters + player needs to even have audio on to draw any strategic inferences from what they are watching?
On April 22 2011 13:34 Fionn wrote: I enjoy IPL more. NASL does have better players, but I still think the highest competition in the world is still easily GSL, so I don't put much weight in who has the better players. IPL seems to be more on the ball than NASL; no walkovers, better production, and more prepared.
I do like the whole NASL doing a gigantic round robin and making it more like a sports regular season, but that will be a turn off for most people. They will see these matches as less important than any other tournament, and with players seemingly giving walkovers like it's nothing, it just adds to the image that the regular season portion of the tournament is useless.
I'm sure the ending of NASL will be huge and get tons of viewers, but before that, I think the viewer interest might even go down even more.
I think a lot of the walkovers have to do with the fact that they can miss a day and not be out of the tournament. Frankly, I think it's a little short-sighted by some of these players...I know it happens, but it may very well end up biting some of them and if you don't make the top 2 of your group you face the possibility of not automatically qualifying for the next season. This is why I still look forward to NASL more -- because I think the idea of having a regular season (including that open bracket which may lead to interesting 16 seeds) leading up to a playoffs will make for some exciting times and drama.
That said however, I would echo what most sane people are saying. There's no reason they can't co-exist and they both in their formats provide slightly different experiences, both for the players and spectators. I think of IPL as March Madness and NASL as the NBA in that sense. Both exciting for their own reasons.
On April 22 2011 13:41 tychusfuddley wrote: One question? How many viewers it will take for IPL 2 to happen?. Is 10,000 viewers to low?. I think they need at least 50,000 to 60,000 live viewers for IPL 2 to happen.
Probably has a lot to do with VOD views as well, live numbers aren't everything. It also has to compete for viewers with NASL and other tournies/streamers going on during the live broadcast.
IPL blew me away today, I wish I hadn't already been spoilered the results!
On April 22 2011 12:51 sermokala wrote: my views arn't set in stone if you saw any of the threads I was completely jacked for IPL and I was loving the stream every moment until TB came on.
"tiny minority"? did you even look at the viewer counts for tonight? NASL was 5k less then IPL at the start but at the end it was less then 1k away from each other.
Even day9 said that he enjoyed his trolls and hes a god among us whats wrong with you? I'm saying my opinion you don't have to attack me because of that.
I'm not attacking you, I'm not entirely sure why you're taking offence. Your opinion is not immune from criticism, nor is anyone elses.
Bullshit you aren't attacking him.
Almost every single post that says something bad about IGNPL. You have jumped in going OMG how dare you say something bad.
If it doesn't affect you sit down and stop making yourself look stupid by attacking everyone
Was too early for me to watch IPL so will watch when vods come out and see how it goes
Argh...what is with all this comparing NASL and IPL...they are two different children working together to raise up this great house, as it stands. They shall not squabble amongst each other...
Let us strive to grow this house of E-sports and raise it up to the heavens...where all shall see and proclaim with wonder.
Anyway, really nice broadcast. Was digging the 1080p.
I remember when he described Artosis' cat as "the most perfect being on Earth" on State of the Game. I was like, "Holy Shit! Idra actually ... likes something!"
The way I feel about commentators if you commentate it learn more about it. It's not like the people who commentate sports games only know the basics about it. They are usually experts on the game. I'm not saying you have to be a grandmasters league player, because that wouldn't even allow artosis to commentate. You don't have to be good at the game to understand the things you can remember: which are builds, counter builds, proper timing, and certain styles of players and all that.
That being said a lot of commentators do have that but people don't realize it. The biggest thing people I think hate is when commentators call the wrong thing out when it comes to analysis.
Then again I think there could be a study of commentators because it seems so important when in comparison to other sports and games there's not as much speculation and controversy. I in general think this holds the scene back, People need to appreciate the games and the casters for who they are and stop getting into the nit and grit about casters and saying "i muted it because of the casters", if we want e-sports to grow stop putting this divide.
In the end I really don't understand the obsession, watch for the players not the casters...
On April 22 2011 13:41 tychusfuddley wrote: One question? How many viewers it will take for IPL 2 to happen?. Is 10,000 viewers to low?. I think they need at least 50,000 to 60,000 live viewers for IPL 2 to happen.
Probably has a lot to do with VOD views as well, live numbers aren't everything. It also has to compete for viewers with NASL and other tournies/streamers going on during the live broadcast.
IPL blew me away today, I wish I hadn't already been spoilered the results!
IIRC, IGN have said they are committed to a IPL2. So that's already locked down.
On April 22 2011 13:41 tychusfuddley wrote: One question? How many viewers it will take for IPL 2 to happen?. Is 10,000 viewers to low?. I think they need at least 50,000 to 60,000 live viewers for IPL 2 to happen.
Probably has a lot to do with VOD views as well, live numbers aren't everything. It also has to compete for viewers with NASL and other tournies/streamers going on during the live broadcast.
IPL blew me away today, I wish I hadn't already been spoilered the results!
IIRC, IGN have said they are committed to a IPL2. So that's already locked down.
Plus expecting 50 to 60k viewers is ridiculous. TSL3's opening weekend had like 50k and has hit 40k the rest of the time and thats something people have been waiting for. No way IPL will get that many viewers off the bat.
I honestly expected this league to pretty bad with the whole cheesy/corny promo they had but my entire opinion was changed after today. Way fantastic quality and casting.
Hi, everyone, thanks for tuning in tonight and all the support, we are blown away by your passion and love for the game. IPL2 is confirmed, and from our point of view success is not only gauged by how many concurrent users are watching the live stream, but also how many VOD views we get, and most importantly, how well received we are by the greater community.
This is a really, really good starting point. That's what I'm happy about. It's far from perfect, but what it is is very, very smooth and fast.
It's not close to what a full production should be, but this is the first night of the first league. I can only see it improving, and that's what's so good about it.
Simlarily to the NASL in that, if you are guaranteed to be locked down for more events, then I expect production to rise and continually smooth out each week and get better and better. Like I said, great, great starting point and can't wait until next season (or even later this season perhaps).
On April 22 2011 13:32 Turo wrote: I would just like to add my opinion in here:
Positive
1 - TB and DJW actually drew me into the games, and made them interesting in a way that hasn't happened before. Usually I'm more of a "Oh that was a good play, I wonder what his next move is?" type of spectator, but the casters really got me interested in the outcome of the game! So big props for that.
2 - Loved the production, made everything seem really cohesive. "Felt" like a real sports game that you might find on a sports channel on TV, something I think all leagues should aim for if they want to go mainstream.
Negative
1 - As has been mentioned before, 2 casters might be a better option. However, if the 2nd caster's audio isn't in sync. (ie: done over skype, not live in person), then I feel going with one smooth caster is better. In short: 2 cohesive live casters > 1 caster > 2 casters out of sync/bad audio.
TSL does 2 casters over skype, using a program to make sure that the replays are in sync, so there definatelly is a way to do it, and outside the rare ocasion were the connection of one of them craps out, you can't even notice they aren't in the same house. And even in those ocasions it is fixed quickly.
imho, I think IPL needs to do dual casting. Both casters, TotalBiscuit and Wheat, did an awesome job today but its hard for single caster to catch all details of the match. I ignored NASL in favour of IPL. I watched both streams and sound quality for NASL was horrible so had to leave IPL sound on while watching both leagues.
Amazing, amazing job. Well done, SCReddit HWAITING !!!
On April 22 2011 13:57 edward.IGN wrote: Hi, everyone, thanks for tuning in tonight and all the support, we are blown away by your passion and love for the game. IPL2 is confirmed, and from our point of view success is not only gauged by how many concurrent users are watching the live stream, but also how many VOD views we get, and most importantly, how well received we are by the greater community.
On April 22 2011 13:57 edward.IGN wrote: Hi, everyone, thanks for tuning in tonight and all the support, we are blown away by your passion and love for the game. IPL2 is confirmed, and from our point of view success is not only gauged by how many concurrent users are watching the live stream, but also how many VOD views we get, and most importantly, how well received we are by the greater community.
On April 22 2011 13:57 edward.IGN wrote: Hi, everyone, thanks for tuning in tonight and all the support, we are blown away by your passion and love for the game. IPL2 is confirmed, and from our point of view success is not only gauged by how many concurrent users are watching the live stream, but also how many VOD views we get, and most importantly, how well received we are by the greater community.
It was a fantastic production. I will definitely be spreading the word. You guys have set the standard really high.
On April 22 2011 14:06 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: Just out of curiosity... how does IGN/ WP make money from this?
There aren't even any commercials between games...
There will be commercials eventually. I believe they removed the commercial for the first few days because they got a certain amount of followers on twitters or facebook likes.
Basically i think IGN is looking at this in the long term ie they do not try to make profit immediately but first try to lure more people in
unless casters have worked together before, they usually wind up talking over each other or putting in long silences. I though TB and Wheat struck a nice balance between analytical and exciting, which will really go a long way towards making Starcraft 2 more enjoyable, let's face it, most people don't care about the unit composition unless they are watching for tips, or because they are hardcore fans, personally, i watch casts for enjoyment, I'll watch replays for information
great job IPL, Wheat and TB, keep up your awesome work!
Not reading through the whole thing... But just going on the website, I saw "First two days of IPL1 will be ad-free!" >.> Just saying. So don't rejoice too quickly about IPL being ad free.
On April 22 2011 14:06 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: Just out of curiosity... how does IGN/ WP make money from this?
There aren't even any commercials between games...
There will be commercials eventually. I believe they removed the commercial for the first few days because they got a certain amount of followers on twitters or facebook likes.
Basically i think IGN is looking at this in the long term ie they do not try to make profit immediately but first try to lure more people in
Ah, well that makes sense. I think that's a smart marketing move, and I don't blame them for putting ads in there eventually.
I certainly don't mind watching commercials between games for this level of production
The biggest problem i find with dual casting is usually one of the casters feels need to show they have a bigger dick aka talk over the other caster or in some way try to show they are more dominant. Countless times i've seen one caster just cut off the other caster with something not even that important to the game.
On April 22 2011 13:41 tychusfuddley wrote: One question? How many viewers it will take for IPL 2 to happen?. Is 10,000 viewers to low?. I think they need at least 50,000 to 60,000 live viewers for IPL 2 to happen.
Probably has a lot to do with VOD views as well, live numbers aren't everything. It also has to compete for viewers with NASL and other tournies/streamers going on during the live broadcast.
IPL blew me away today, I wish I hadn't already been spoilered the results!
IIRC, IGN have said they are committed to a IPL2. So that's already locked down.
Plus expecting 50 to 60k viewers is ridiculous. TSL3's opening weekend had like 50k and has hit 40k the rest of the time and thats something people have been waiting for. No way IPL will get that many viewers off the bat.
That many viewers is ambitious but they truly delivered with their production and casting today. If the players bring great and entertaining matches than it's something that is achievable by the time the second season starts.
I agree with the sentiment that IPL is doing what NASL wanted to do.
But as it is, NASL has a long road ahead of them. What they are doing is much bigger of a task than IPL. The way IPL has done it is much smater though, started small without a lot of hype then grow it.
It isn't like NASL is terrible, but IPL, IMO, will have greater success, just due to quality alone. Although I'm quite content watching just the games, a lot of people need more to draw them in, especially those who aren't enthusiasts already.
But the internet has a thing for quality, make great content and people will come. NASL already has a large following, if they take community feedback seriously then they are only going to get bigger.
In the future I think NASL will have to adopt the IGN approach, of free Vods w/ advertising and better production quality. But for now just fixing the video/sound issues and improving the casting will go a long way
On April 22 2011 14:11 2WeaK wrote: Not reading through the whole thing... But just going on the website, I saw "First two days of IPL1 will be ad-free!" >.> Just saying. So don't rejoice too quickly about IPL being ad free.
Who cares, though? It's free and it's awesome, so bring on the commercials.. not any different than tuning into any other sport. I hope all tournaments all eventually follow this business model.
I find this phrase really obnoxious. Am I alone in that?
it does seem a little obnoxious, but let's be honest here. i watched the first day of IPL and you casted like you were selling starcraft 2 to a bunch of console gamers. i don't have an issue with that because you're bringing a bunch of people into esports but at the same time alienating those of us that really love it enough to stay up till 4 am watching live GSL - the "true fans"
Not really. Some of you are alienated, but not all. The noisy few will always come out in opposition of play-by-play casting, but it's the silent majority that are more important. Every caster alienates somebody, it's not worth worrying about and in this case, the IPL was not aimed squarely at TL's demographic anyway, yet still managed to attract and SUSTAIN a significant viewer count from them, so that alone is proof the concept is worth pursuing.
The negativity really is rather depressing if ya take it too seriously and it seems some people are more interesting in tearing down the efforts of others all in the name of 'true fandom'. A true fan would celebrate anything that moves eSports forward, I would think.
I agree with total biscuit 100%, this kind of league put by IGN is the perfect way to introduce people to sc2 and it's entertaining to listen to. There are plenty of videos with game commentary as opposed to casting, but a tournament is supposed to be about hype and excitement. We can analyze the games later. Watch the MLB, during the season the commentators discuss the game, but the cast always needs someone to bring excitement. Once the world series hits, most of the commentating goes away and it's pure casting because people want to watch something exciting. The majority of people watching are not hardcore players, just ask day9. Good job total biscuit
mmmnmmmnmm I'm getting this werid feeling like we're getting into the same debate of husky vs day9 which really makes me :/ because I like husky and I feel like I'm going against him.
just like the day9 vs husky debate, you can still be in both camps. everyone will however find a preference for one or the either.
IPL is seemingly being presented merely as training wheels for real SC2. zero analysis, no player thoughts after games, just lots of 'violence' and graphical fluff with very little focus on strategy or tactics. IGN is clearly focusing on a different demographic that will hopefully funnel a ton of people into the scene the same way husky did. strictly judging after today, i would rather watch NASL for the most part.
I prefer NASL as well, simply because of the caliber of play. I think the NASL will really start to heat up as the players compete for the first and second seeds and enter "must-win" situations.
But I have to admit, there's a lot of little things that the IPL is doing well that the NASL should pick up on.
Good production is all about the details.
keep in mind that these games were played long ago in order to give the production team enough time to create these pretty overlays and the consequence is that the results are leaked and the entire league spoiled. i wouldn't dare open the JTV chat while watching if i bother to even keep watching.
NASL has technical issues that will be ironed out over time but it is a fully functioning league that the purists can get behind and support. i really want it to succeed because they have the right formula when it comes to esports.
Maybe I have access to different information than you but as a huge starcraft nerd(i loved those qxschool and stik casts and ancient day9 dailies where he never gets excited about anything) I think your complaints about their being fundamental issues with the IPL are more than just a little ridiculous. I'm not that big on the casting but regarding the games or the player pool or the prizes, have you even been paying attention? These were the dudes they could get out to the studio for the production on the test run. There will be actual qualifiers in future seasons which strikes me as something you SHOULD be supporting as a "true fan" because it promotes players who can demonstrably produce results; no subjectivity or guesswork is needed. The NASL system's qualifier system is extremely limited, even for the people it brings in in season 2.
Regarding the spoilers, it's a major issue. This was pointed out to IGN.Alex on SomethingAwful and he had this to say:
"The guest account thing where you can schedule times for the players and then go into the files and edit their names to the correct name is great if you're on the same kind of timetable as the TSL. We're wanting to move a little faster and provide more then 2 days of content a week, so it's harder to work that in. It's absolutely something we considered though, and may revisit that idea in the future. It's without a doubt the most secure way to hide results.
We will likely be using cloaked maps though next time."
spoiler is a massive issue. i find it completely unacceptable that the results for an entire tournament are leaked before the first game even airs. this would never happen to any tournament that takes itself seriously. what happened in IPL is entirely a fundamental error.
IPL is also presenting itself wrong by making the players into generic nerds fighting each other like robots. the players themselves give no thoughts or input throughout day 1. no interviews, no discussions, only casters like TB and wheat typecasting them into something that casual gamers can relate with.
as a spectator, i like to know more about how player 'X' would have reacted to situation 'Y' and if he regrets playing build 'Z'. that stuff is critical to not only helping people appreciate such a deep game, but giving insight into what makes these players so supremely talented.
The only thing IPL has over NASL is production value.
The casters aren't as good. The matchups aren't as good. They don't have the stat tracking, standings, win rates vs different races, player profiles, team profiles, etc...
I'm surprised people care so much about things like the background music and the wall behind the casters. Why is that more important than the infrastructure housed on the NASL website and the quality of the matches.
They have some hiccups because they have a less experienced production team, but that can easily and will improve with time.
This hype over IPL is just the spillover of the disappointed from NASL. People are just mad about NASL. Same reason people thought Dreamhack was greatest thing on the face of this Earth; it came after MLG Dallas.
On April 22 2011 14:40 jiveturkey wrote: The only thing IPL has over NASL is production value.
The casters aren't as good. The matchups aren't as good. They don't have the stat tracking, standings, win rates vs different races, player profiles, team profiles, etc...
I'm surprised people care so much about things like the background music and the wall behind the casters. Why is that more important than the infrastructure housed on the NASL website and the quality of the matches.
They have some hiccups because they have a less experienced production team, but that can easily and will improve with time.
This hype over IPL is just the spillover of the disappointed from NASL. People are just mad about NASL. Same reason people thought Dreamhack was greatest thing on the face of this Earth; it came after MLG Dallas.
Its not that people care so much about the production value, its that the production value is that good. Its probably the best production we have seen so far.
And Dreamhack was great and deserved the praise it got.
On April 22 2011 14:40 jiveturkey wrote: The only thing IPL has over NASL is production value.
The casters aren't as good. The matchups aren't as good. They don't have the stat tracking, standings, win rates vs different races, player profiles, team profiles, etc...
I'm surprised people care so much about things like the background music and the wall behind the casters. Why is that more important than the infrastructure housed on the NASL website and the quality of the matches.
They have some hiccups because they have a less experienced production team, but that can easily and will improve with time.
This hype over IPL is just the spillover of the disappointed from NASL. People are just mad about NASL. Same reason people thought Dreamhack was greatest thing on the face of this Earth; it came after MLG Dallas.
Not really, this has already been addressed previously...
The casters are fine, it comes down to preference, I'd say it's a toss up as to which casting setup you like more and which casters you like more.
The matchups are fairly good, almost everyone in the IPL is also in the NASL and the people who aren't were barely left out so... Yeah. Sure, we don't get to see Boxer or Nada, so I'll sort of give you that, but considering that this was an introductory tournament meant for NA players, it's not really a huge deal.
Stat tracking, win rates vs different races, player profiles, team profiles... They don't really need the first two right now considering that this is a tournament as opposed to a league/divisional format. As for player profiles, they have rudimentary ones with much better interviews available than those of the NASL.
You act as thought production is not a big deal but you forget that we're talking about the quality of the stream, audio, graphics, stability and accessibility all for free. This is pretty much a base line of what a really good tournament should have.
People praised the quality of the TSL3 and the Reddit Invitational a while back for the same reasons if I'm not mistaken. The first round of the TSL was sort of iffy with pros dropping without much of a fight, but people still praised the shit out of the production quality.
Similarly, Dreamhack was praised because it was great... It's not all spill-over from previous events.
On April 22 2011 14:40 jiveturkey wrote: The only thing IPL has over NASL is production value.
The casters aren't as good. The matchups aren't as good. They don't have the stat tracking, standings, win rates vs different races, player profiles, team profiles, etc...
I'm surprised people care so much about things like the background music and the wall behind the casters. Why is that more important than the infrastructure housed on the NASL website and the quality of the matches.
They have some hiccups because they have a less experienced production team, but that can easily and will improve with time.
This hype over IPL is just the spillover of the disappointed from NASL. People are just mad about NASL. Same reason people thought Dreamhack was greatest thing on the face of this Earth; it came after MLG Dallas.
I agree with this. Cool name animations and music only go so far, the actual game quality should be the deciding factor. I'll wait till NASL gets into further rounds before judging.
On April 22 2011 12:38 DirtYLOu wrote: IPL >>>>>> NASL
And to think that NASL has SO MUCH more money, and still IPL's production is better...
Just cause its shinier does NOT mean its better. IPL cannot compete with the player lineup and the amount of matches NASL has right now. Lets remember why we love starcraft so much. We love the players and the competition!
I agree but us from EU can watch it so wtf is the point!!
If it didint have toe tail bee scut from shout crawft it would the bested by no one but the GSL..still have more respect for 100% live lan-esk gaming from korea, but the animations and transitions were flawless.....where was the hype for this???? better than nasl IMO but we have yet to see the live lan stuff from them so i still expect alot
On April 22 2011 12:36 TotalBiscuit wrote: [quote]
I find this phrase really obnoxious. Am I alone in that?
it does seem a little obnoxious, but let's be honest here. i watched the first day of IPL and you casted like you were selling starcraft 2 to a bunch of console gamers. i don't have an issue with that because you're bringing a bunch of people into esports but at the same time alienating those of us that really love it enough to stay up till 4 am watching live GSL - the "true fans"
Not really. Some of you are alienated, but not all. The noisy few will always come out in opposition of play-by-play casting, but it's the silent majority that are more important. Every caster alienates somebody, it's not worth worrying about and in this case, the IPL was not aimed squarely at TL's demographic anyway, yet still managed to attract and SUSTAIN a significant viewer count from them, so that alone is proof the concept is worth pursuing.
The negativity really is rather depressing if ya take it too seriously and it seems some people are more interesting in tearing down the efforts of others all in the name of 'true fandom'. A true fan would celebrate anything that moves eSports forward, I would think.
I agree with total biscuit 100%, this kind of league put by IGN is the perfect way to introduce people to sc2 and it's entertaining to listen to. There are plenty of videos with game commentary as opposed to casting, but a tournament is supposed to be about hype and excitement. We can analyze the games later. Watch the MLB, during the season the commentators discuss the game, but the cast always needs someone to bring excitement. Once the world series hits, most of the commentating goes away and it's pure casting because people want to watch something exciting. The majority of people watching are not hardcore players, just ask day9. Good job total biscuit
mmmnmmmnmm I'm getting this werid feeling like we're getting into the same debate of husky vs day9 which really makes me :/ because I like husky and I feel like I'm going against him.
just like the day9 vs husky debate, you can still be in both camps. everyone will however find a preference for one or the either.
IPL is seemingly being presented merely as training wheels for real SC2. zero analysis, no player thoughts after games, just lots of 'violence' and graphical fluff with very little focus on strategy or tactics. IGN is clearly focusing on a different demographic that will hopefully funnel a ton of people into the scene the same way husky did. strictly judging after today, i would rather watch NASL for the most part.
I prefer NASL as well, simply because of the caliber of play. I think the NASL will really start to heat up as the players compete for the first and second seeds and enter "must-win" situations.
But I have to admit, there's a lot of little things that the IPL is doing well that the NASL should pick up on.
Good production is all about the details.
keep in mind that these games were played long ago in order to give the production team enough time to create these pretty overlays and the consequence is that the results are leaked and the entire league spoiled. i wouldn't dare open the JTV chat while watching if i bother to even keep watching.
NASL has technical issues that will be ironed out over time but it is a fully functioning league that the purists can get behind and support. i really want it to succeed because they have the right formula when it comes to esports.
Maybe I have access to different information than you but as a huge starcraft nerd(i loved those qxschool and stik casts and ancient day9 dailies where he never gets excited about anything) I think your complaints about their being fundamental issues with the IPL are more than just a little ridiculous. I'm not that big on the casting but regarding the games or the player pool or the prizes, have you even been paying attention? These were the dudes they could get out to the studio for the production on the test run. There will be actual qualifiers in future seasons which strikes me as something you SHOULD be supporting as a "true fan" because it promotes players who can demonstrably produce results; no subjectivity or guesswork is needed. The NASL system's qualifier system is extremely limited, even for the people it brings in in season 2.
Regarding the spoilers, it's a major issue. This was pointed out to IGN.Alex on SomethingAwful and he had this to say:
"The guest account thing where you can schedule times for the players and then go into the files and edit their names to the correct name is great if you're on the same kind of timetable as the TSL. We're wanting to move a little faster and provide more then 2 days of content a week, so it's harder to work that in. It's absolutely something we considered though, and may revisit that idea in the future. It's without a doubt the most secure way to hide results.
We will likely be using cloaked maps though next time."
spoiler is a massive issue. i find it completely unacceptable that the results for an entire tournament are leaked before the first game even airs. this would never happen to any tournament that takes itself seriously. what happened in IPL is entirely a fundamental error.
IPL is also presenting itself wrong by making the players into generic nerds fighting each other like robots. the players themselves give no thoughts or input throughout day 1. no interviews, no discussions, only casters like TB and wheat typecasting them into something that casual gamers can relate with.
as a spectator, i like to know more about how player 'X' would have reacted to situation 'Y' and if he regrets playing build 'Z'. that stuff is critical to not only helping people appreciate such a deep game, but giving insight into what makes these players so supremely talented.
Why is the leaking of results a fundamental error? It was caused by negligence and to say it is a fundamental error means it will happen over and over again because it is due to the way they do things. If they use maps who hide results as well as not accidentally posting the results then it won't happen again. Was it a grave error? Sure it was. But it was in no way fundamental
And actually the insights that you are asking for are in the website.A lot of players are interviewed in the website very professionally. For example, catz were interviewed about his cheeses and why he does it and does he think it takes less skill. A few other players were also asked about what they think of catz's unorthodox style.
. By tying the interviews with the game, viewers can understand his mindset in doing so. I think that gives "insight to the players"
Oh and i feel that Dreamhack was the best tournament ever. Awesome games , players, productions, casters and the best HOST ever. Regardless of how MLG Dallas went, praises will still be sung about DH invitational.
On April 22 2011 12:38 DirtYLOu wrote: IPL >>>>>> NASL
And to think that NASL has SO MUCH more money, and still IPL's production is better...
Wait what? NASL has more money than IGN? Just because they have a bigger prise pool doesn't mean they have more money. IGN is a huge company that has way more money than NASL.
1) Pretty awesome quality. Probably the best out there, together with GSL. 2) There are some points where you can work on. But this is a test run season, and the things that I would like you to change seems to be easy to change, like getting another caster. And I heard on SotG you have a pretty solid line-up.
These are my first thoughts. If I have to pay 25$ to support you or the NASL I would probably spend it on you guys. You seem to be professionals.
There's one major difference between the NASL and the IGN Proleague and that is the casting. Diamond level knowledge solo casting and Grandmaster level knowledge duo casting.
I'd like to see DJ Wheat and TB paired up with good commentators in the future.
Funny how ppl change... I remember when people were bitching at the NASL for their player selection and the "Lack of Koreans"
I was impressed with TB and the way it looked but the competition doesnt match to that of NASL. The more leagues the better though, just makes it hard for me to watch 2 streams at the same time
On April 22 2011 13:41 tychusfuddley wrote: One question? How many viewers it will take for IPL 2 to happen?. Is 10,000 viewers to low?. I think they need at least 50,000 to 60,000 live viewers for IPL 2 to happen.
Probably has a lot to do with VOD views as well, live numbers aren't everything. It also has to compete for viewers with NASL and other tournies/streamers going on during the live broadcast.
IPL blew me away today, I wish I hadn't already been spoilered the results!
IIRC, IGN have said they are committed to a IPL2. So that's already locked down.
Plus expecting 50 to 60k viewers is ridiculous. TSL3's opening weekend had like 50k and has hit 40k the rest of the time and thats something people have been waiting for. No way IPL will get that many viewers off the bat.
That many viewers is ambitious but they truly delivered with their production and casting today. If the players bring great and entertaining matches than it's something that is achievable by the time the second season starts.
Maybe it's just cause this is a test run, but I think IGN could be doing a much better job of promoting the tourney. All they have dedicated to the event is a skinny ass banner on the homepage. Basically looks like adspace. Maybe once the league proves itself a little more (off to a good start :D), they'll give it a main tab to draw in the muggles.
On April 22 2011 12:36 TotalBiscuit wrote: [quote]
I find this phrase really obnoxious. Am I alone in that?
it does seem a little obnoxious, but let's be honest here. i watched the first day of IPL and you casted like you were selling starcraft 2 to a bunch of console gamers. i don't have an issue with that because you're bringing a bunch of people into esports but at the same time alienating those of us that really love it enough to stay up till 4 am watching live GSL - the "true fans"
Not really. Some of you are alienated, but not all. The noisy few will always come out in opposition of play-by-play casting, but it's the silent majority that are more important. Every caster alienates somebody, it's not worth worrying about and in this case, the IPL was not aimed squarely at TL's demographic anyway, yet still managed to attract and SUSTAIN a significant viewer count from them, so that alone is proof the concept is worth pursuing.
The negativity really is rather depressing if ya take it too seriously and it seems some people are more interesting in tearing down the efforts of others all in the name of 'true fandom'. A true fan would celebrate anything that moves eSports forward, I would think.
I agree with total biscuit 100%, this kind of league put by IGN is the perfect way to introduce people to sc2 and it's entertaining to listen to. There are plenty of videos with game commentary as opposed to casting, but a tournament is supposed to be about hype and excitement. We can analyze the games later. Watch the MLB, during the season the commentators discuss the game, but the cast always needs someone to bring excitement. Once the world series hits, most of the commentating goes away and it's pure casting because people want to watch something exciting. The majority of people watching are not hardcore players, just ask day9. Good job total biscuit
mmmnmmmnmm I'm getting this werid feeling like we're getting into the same debate of husky vs day9 which really makes me :/ because I like husky and I feel like I'm going against him.
just like the day9 vs husky debate, you can still be in both camps. everyone will however find a preference for one or the either.
IPL is seemingly being presented merely as training wheels for real SC2. zero analysis, no player thoughts after games, just lots of 'violence' and graphical fluff with very little focus on strategy or tactics. IGN is clearly focusing on a different demographic that will hopefully funnel a ton of people into the scene the same way husky did. strictly judging after today, i would rather watch NASL for the most part.
I prefer NASL as well, simply because of the caliber of play. I think the NASL will really start to heat up as the players compete for the first and second seeds and enter "must-win" situations.
But I have to admit, there's a lot of little things that the IPL is doing well that the NASL should pick up on.
Good production is all about the details.
keep in mind that these games were played long ago in order to give the production team enough time to create these pretty overlays and the consequence is that the results are leaked and the entire league spoiled. i wouldn't dare open the JTV chat while watching if i bother to even keep watching.
NASL has technical issues that will be ironed out over time but it is a fully functioning league that the purists can get behind and support. i really want it to succeed because they have the right formula when it comes to esports.
Maybe I have access to different information than you but as a huge starcraft nerd(i loved those qxschool and stik casts and ancient day9 dailies where he never gets excited about anything) I think your complaints about their being fundamental issues with the IPL are more than just a little ridiculous. I'm not that big on the casting but regarding the games or the player pool or the prizes, have you even been paying attention? These were the dudes they could get out to the studio for the production on the test run. There will be actual qualifiers in future seasons which strikes me as something you SHOULD be supporting as a "true fan" because it promotes players who can demonstrably produce results; no subjectivity or guesswork is needed. The NASL system's qualifier system is extremely limited, even for the people it brings in in season 2.
Regarding the spoilers, it's a major issue. This was pointed out to IGN.Alex on SomethingAwful and he had this to say:
"The guest account thing where you can schedule times for the players and then go into the files and edit their names to the correct name is great if you're on the same kind of timetable as the TSL. We're wanting to move a little faster and provide more then 2 days of content a week, so it's harder to work that in. It's absolutely something we considered though, and may revisit that idea in the future. It's without a doubt the most secure way to hide results.
We will likely be using cloaked maps though next time."
spoiler is a massive issue. i find it completely unacceptable that the results for an entire tournament are leaked before the first game even airs. this would never happen to any tournament that takes itself seriously. what happened in IPL is entirely a fundamental error.
IPL is also presenting itself wrong by making the players into generic nerds fighting each other like robots. the players themselves give no thoughts or input throughout day 1. no interviews, no discussions, only casters like TB and wheat typecasting them into something that casual gamers can relate with.
as a spectator, i like to know more about how player 'X' would have reacted to situation 'Y' and if he regrets playing build 'Z'. that stuff is critical to not only helping people appreciate such a deep game, but giving insight into what makes these players so supremely talented.
You haven't actually been on the IPL website, have you? Or have 80% of the videos just not shown up on your screen? Everything you're asking for is right there.
Also, the spoiler thing is going to be avoided the next round. One round of spoilers against three walk overs in a week? I'll take the spoilers and just ignore the chat >.<
I only got to see a little but I think the production quality was top notch and I just want to give some praise to the guys who made it happen. I know us nerds give a lot of shit to the NASL for having a 30 minute pregame show but I think the back story is important and having pro players that have interacted with the players in game and have some background potentially makes the series a lot more exciting.
On an unrelated note, if IGN's target audience is new viewers I am not sure how they can get them. I know they have a much larger reach with their website and that could potentially lead people to watch but I just feel like that is a rough market but an extremely important one. Good luck to IGN in reaching out, I am happy to see someone with the foresight.
The reason why the production value needs to be high is to draw in new people.
They'll see it, think it looks cool, and latch on.
NASL on the other hand, someone new looks at it and thinks its not that important since not a lot of work/effort was placed into it. It's got a big dollar sign that has no representation.
On April 22 2011 14:40 jiveturkey wrote: The only thing IPL has over NASL is production value.
The casters aren't as good. The matchups aren't as good. They don't have the stat tracking, standings, win rates vs different races, player profiles, team profiles, etc...
I'm surprised people care so much about things like the background music and the wall behind the casters. Why is that more important than the infrastructure housed on the NASL website and the quality of the matches.
They have some hiccups because they have a less experienced production team, but that can easily and will improve with time.
This hype over IPL is just the spillover of the disappointed from NASL. People are just mad about NASL. Same reason people thought Dreamhack was greatest thing on the face of this Earth; it came after MLG Dallas.
Production value is very, very important to attract casual viewers. As are the quality of the casters. I find djWHEAT and TotalBiscuit to be excellent casters, I can't get enough of them, whereas NASL casters wear on me after a game or 2. Obviously your opinion on casters doesn't match everyone's.
I'm surprised people care so much about stat tracking, win rates vs races, player profiles, team profiles, etc. The games are what matters for casual viewers. Not everyone is as hardcore into SC2 as you are.
The fact that NASL has sucked isn't the reason people are appreciating IPL. Even if NASL didn't exist, I'd still be loving the high quality, slick transitions, and great casting. The player pool will improve in quality over time through qualifiers, and the ones they have now aren't exactly bad either.
If IPL conflicts with anything in the future, I'll probably be tuning into the IPL because it's excelling in making for a great spectator experience. Unless the matches elsewhere are something like MC vs IdrA or equally epic. ^^
Maybe it's the VODs on IGN's site, but not showing the live caster just makes the production a bit impersonal. I like watching the casters in GSL, Dreamhack, MLG, etc. I hope IGN can show the casters.
Definitely the best NA tournament i've seen. I hate to bash NASL since it does no good for e-sports but if they want to be the biggest tourny in NA they better step it up.
On April 22 2011 14:40 jiveturkey wrote: The only thing IPL has over NASL is production value.
The casters aren't as good. The matchups aren't as good. They don't have the stat tracking, standings, win rates vs different races, player profiles, team profiles, etc...
I'm surprised people care so much about things like the background music and the wall behind the casters. Why is that more important than the infrastructure housed on the NASL website and the quality of the matches.
They have some hiccups because they have a less experienced production team, but that can easily and will improve with time.
This hype over IPL is just the spillover of the disappointed from NASL. People are just mad about NASL. Same reason people thought Dreamhack was greatest thing on the face of this Earth; it came after MLG Dallas.
Production value is very, very important to attract casual viewers. As are the quality of the casters. I find djWHEAT and TotalBiscuit to be excellent casters, I can't get enough of them
Actually, production value is extremely important to pretty much any viewer. I also agree that TotalBiscuit and djWHEAT are phenomenal casters and seem to be getting better at casting and following the action in SC2 with practice. I only watched around 40 minutes of IGN today and it was the best produced stream I've ever seen. I have no idea why people complain about the lack of "analytical" casters, I was able to follow the 2 games I watched completely from start to finish, understand what was going on and follow the strategies the players were going for in both games. Great job and I look forward to when I finish exams so I can actually watch the whole thing and enjoy the excellent production.
On April 22 2011 14:40 jiveturkey wrote: The only thing IPL has over NASL is production value.
The casters aren't as good. The matchups aren't as good. They don't have the stat tracking, standings, win rates vs different races, player profiles, team profiles, etc...
I'm surprised people care so much about things like the background music and the wall behind the casters. Why is that more important than the infrastructure housed on the NASL website and the quality of the matches.
They have some hiccups because they have a less experienced production team, but that can easily and will improve with time.
This hype over IPL is just the spillover of the disappointed from NASL. People are just mad about NASL. Same reason people thought Dreamhack was greatest thing on the face of this Earth; it came after MLG Dallas.
Production value is very, very important to attract casual viewers. As are the quality of the casters. I find djWHEAT and TotalBiscuit to be excellent casters, I can't get enough of them
Actually, production value is extremely important to pretty much any viewer. I also agree that TotalBiscuit and djWHEAT are phenomenal casters and seem to be getting better at casting and following the action in SC2 with practice. I only watched around 40 minutes of IGN today and it was the best produced stream I've ever seen. I have no idea why people complain about the lack of "analytical" casters, I was able to follow the 2 games I watched completely from start to finish, understand what was going on and follow the strategies the players were going for in both games. Great job and I look forward to when I finish exams so I can actually watch the whole thing and enjoy the excellent production.
I think the main stumbling block for a lot of people is the fact that the casters themselves are not professional players and thus often don't have anything to say strategically that is surprising to them. I feel like as I watch more games I have started to really get into casters like artosis, gretorp, and incontrol just because they tell me things I don't know.
Don't get me wrong I love DjWheat and think he is definitely one of the all time greats but the fact of the matter is he needs a color commentator. Totalbiscuit to me is just unbearable but that is personal opinion. The just need to get cocasters with these guys to make it legit as I am sure has been repeated a million times. The more I think about it the more glad I am that HD requested being partnered with Painuser. Basically a genius move that guarantees an overall more interesting experience simply because Painuser is just a stat king. He has such a solid understanding a focus on detail that he can reveal a lot to experienced viewers like me.
On April 22 2011 16:07 mentallyafk wrote: IPL is going to set a new standard as far as production goes. NASL has the better prize pool and players but the production is terrible.
agree that the nasl has a better prize pool and players. i really feel that were still not getting the best games. people playing on cross server does still affect performance. Also these walkovers are kinda disappointing. I feel like nasl has made several promises and has failed to deliver on numerous occasions. i really hope nasl decides to re-think their approach and make some serious changes.
anyway, this thread is about IPL so i will stop ranting about NASL. GOGO IPL!!!
it does seem a little obnoxious, but let's be honest here. i watched the first day of IPL and you casted like you were selling starcraft 2 to a bunch of console gamers. i don't have an issue with that because you're bringing a bunch of people into esports but at the same time alienating those of us that really love it enough to stay up till 4 am watching live GSL - the "true fans"
Not really. Some of you are alienated, but not all. The noisy few will always come out in opposition of play-by-play casting, but it's the silent majority that are more important. Every caster alienates somebody, it's not worth worrying about and in this case, the IPL was not aimed squarely at TL's demographic anyway, yet still managed to attract and SUSTAIN a significant viewer count from them, so that alone is proof the concept is worth pursuing.
The negativity really is rather depressing if ya take it too seriously and it seems some people are more interesting in tearing down the efforts of others all in the name of 'true fandom'. A true fan would celebrate anything that moves eSports forward, I would think.
I agree with total biscuit 100%, this kind of league put by IGN is the perfect way to introduce people to sc2 and it's entertaining to listen to. There are plenty of videos with game commentary as opposed to casting, but a tournament is supposed to be about hype and excitement. We can analyze the games later. Watch the MLB, during the season the commentators discuss the game, but the cast always needs someone to bring excitement. Once the world series hits, most of the commentating goes away and it's pure casting because people want to watch something exciting. The majority of people watching are not hardcore players, just ask day9. Good job total biscuit
mmmnmmmnmm I'm getting this werid feeling like we're getting into the same debate of husky vs day9 which really makes me :/ because I like husky and I feel like I'm going against him.
just like the day9 vs husky debate, you can still be in both camps. everyone will however find a preference for one or the either.
IPL is seemingly being presented merely as training wheels for real SC2. zero analysis, no player thoughts after games, just lots of 'violence' and graphical fluff with very little focus on strategy or tactics. IGN is clearly focusing on a different demographic that will hopefully funnel a ton of people into the scene the same way husky did. strictly judging after today, i would rather watch NASL for the most part.
I prefer NASL as well, simply because of the caliber of play. I think the NASL will really start to heat up as the players compete for the first and second seeds and enter "must-win" situations.
But I have to admit, there's a lot of little things that the IPL is doing well that the NASL should pick up on.
Good production is all about the details.
keep in mind that these games were played long ago in order to give the production team enough time to create these pretty overlays and the consequence is that the results are leaked and the entire league spoiled. i wouldn't dare open the JTV chat while watching if i bother to even keep watching.
NASL has technical issues that will be ironed out over time but it is a fully functioning league that the purists can get behind and support. i really want it to succeed because they have the right formula when it comes to esports.
Maybe I have access to different information than you but as a huge starcraft nerd(i loved those qxschool and stik casts and ancient day9 dailies where he never gets excited about anything) I think your complaints about their being fundamental issues with the IPL are more than just a little ridiculous. I'm not that big on the casting but regarding the games or the player pool or the prizes, have you even been paying attention? These were the dudes they could get out to the studio for the production on the test run. There will be actual qualifiers in future seasons which strikes me as something you SHOULD be supporting as a "true fan" because it promotes players who can demonstrably produce results; no subjectivity or guesswork is needed. The NASL system's qualifier system is extremely limited, even for the people it brings in in season 2.
Regarding the spoilers, it's a major issue. This was pointed out to IGN.Alex on SomethingAwful and he had this to say:
"The guest account thing where you can schedule times for the players and then go into the files and edit their names to the correct name is great if you're on the same kind of timetable as the TSL. We're wanting to move a little faster and provide more then 2 days of content a week, so it's harder to work that in. It's absolutely something we considered though, and may revisit that idea in the future. It's without a doubt the most secure way to hide results.
We will likely be using cloaked maps though next time."
spoiler is a massive issue. i find it completely unacceptable that the results for an entire tournament are leaked before the first game even airs. this would never happen to any tournament that takes itself seriously. what happened in IPL is entirely a fundamental error.
IPL is also presenting itself wrong by making the players into generic nerds fighting each other like robots. the players themselves give no thoughts or input throughout day 1. no interviews, no discussions, only casters like TB and wheat typecasting them into something that casual gamers can relate with.
as a spectator, i like to know more about how player 'X' would have reacted to situation 'Y' and if he regrets playing build 'Z'. that stuff is critical to not only helping people appreciate such a deep game, but giving insight into what makes these players so supremely talented.
You haven't actually been on the IPL website, have you? Or have 80% of the videos just not shown up on your screen? Everything you're asking for is right there.
Also, the spoiler thing is going to be avoided the next round. One round of spoilers against three walk overs in a week? I'll take the spoilers and just ignore the chat >.<
The ENTIRE tournament was spoiled, not just "One round." I'm sure they will fix it in the future though, and I really hope they do because I have little motivation to watch any matches now.
The production value is pretty slick, definitely love the Win and the stat screen at the end.
Player pool seems lacking to make me watch it over NASL even though production quality is amazing. Once NASL figures out the sound and occasional bad editing I won't have any reason to even think about watching IPL instead. Also as much as I have problems with Gretorp's voice sometimes I prefer to have some analysis done. IPL is for different target audience than me, but probably much bigger one so they have high chance of success.
On April 22 2011 14:40 jiveturkey wrote: The only thing IPL has over NASL is production value.
The casters aren't as good. The matchups aren't as good. They don't have the stat tracking, standings, win rates vs different races, player profiles, team profiles, etc...
I'm surprised people care so much about things like the background music and the wall behind the casters. Why is that more important than the infrastructure housed on the NASL website and the quality of the matches.
They have some hiccups because they have a less experienced production team, but that can easily and will improve with time.
This hype over IPL is just the spillover of the disappointed from NASL. People are just mad about NASL. Same reason people thought Dreamhack was greatest thing on the face of this Earth; it came after MLG Dallas.
is "matchups aren't as good" code for "no koreans"? imo the best part of the IPL is that it is featuring players i know from the community but don't get to see much in other tournaments. not that every tournament has to be this way, but it's nice to see a tournament that features players who have such a strong presence in the NA scene
it does seem a little obnoxious, but let's be honest here. i watched the first day of IPL and you casted like you were selling starcraft 2 to a bunch of console gamers. i don't have an issue with that because you're bringing a bunch of people into esports but at the same time alienating those of us that really love it enough to stay up till 4 am watching live GSL - the "true fans"
Not really. Some of you are alienated, but not all. The noisy few will always come out in opposition of play-by-play casting, but it's the silent majority that are more important. Every caster alienates somebody, it's not worth worrying about and in this case, the IPL was not aimed squarely at TL's demographic anyway, yet still managed to attract and SUSTAIN a significant viewer count from them, so that alone is proof the concept is worth pursuing.
The negativity really is rather depressing if ya take it too seriously and it seems some people are more interesting in tearing down the efforts of others all in the name of 'true fandom'. A true fan would celebrate anything that moves eSports forward, I would think.
I agree with total biscuit 100%, this kind of league put by IGN is the perfect way to introduce people to sc2 and it's entertaining to listen to. There are plenty of videos with game commentary as opposed to casting, but a tournament is supposed to be about hype and excitement. We can analyze the games later. Watch the MLB, during the season the commentators discuss the game, but the cast always needs someone to bring excitement. Once the world series hits, most of the commentating goes away and it's pure casting because people want to watch something exciting. The majority of people watching are not hardcore players, just ask day9. Good job total biscuit
mmmnmmmnmm I'm getting this werid feeling like we're getting into the same debate of husky vs day9 which really makes me :/ because I like husky and I feel like I'm going against him.
just like the day9 vs husky debate, you can still be in both camps. everyone will however find a preference for one or the either.
IPL is seemingly being presented merely as training wheels for real SC2. zero analysis, no player thoughts after games, just lots of 'violence' and graphical fluff with very little focus on strategy or tactics. IGN is clearly focusing on a different demographic that will hopefully funnel a ton of people into the scene the same way husky did. strictly judging after today, i would rather watch NASL for the most part.
I prefer NASL as well, simply because of the caliber of play. I think the NASL will really start to heat up as the players compete for the first and second seeds and enter "must-win" situations.
But I have to admit, there's a lot of little things that the IPL is doing well that the NASL should pick up on.
Good production is all about the details.
keep in mind that these games were played long ago in order to give the production team enough time to create these pretty overlays and the consequence is that the results are leaked and the entire league spoiled. i wouldn't dare open the JTV chat while watching if i bother to even keep watching.
NASL has technical issues that will be ironed out over time but it is a fully functioning league that the purists can get behind and support. i really want it to succeed because they have the right formula when it comes to esports.
Maybe I have access to different information than you but as a huge starcraft nerd(i loved those qxschool and stik casts and ancient day9 dailies where he never gets excited about anything) I think your complaints about their being fundamental issues with the IPL are more than just a little ridiculous. I'm not that big on the casting but regarding the games or the player pool or the prizes, have you even been paying attention? These were the dudes they could get out to the studio for the production on the test run. There will be actual qualifiers in future seasons which strikes me as something you SHOULD be supporting as a "true fan" because it promotes players who can demonstrably produce results; no subjectivity or guesswork is needed. The NASL system's qualifier system is extremely limited, even for the people it brings in in season 2.
Regarding the spoilers, it's a major issue. This was pointed out to IGN.Alex on SomethingAwful and he had this to say:
"The guest account thing where you can schedule times for the players and then go into the files and edit their names to the correct name is great if you're on the same kind of timetable as the TSL. We're wanting to move a little faster and provide more then 2 days of content a week, so it's harder to work that in. It's absolutely something we considered though, and may revisit that idea in the future. It's without a doubt the most secure way to hide results.
We will likely be using cloaked maps though next time."
spoiler is a massive issue. i find it completely unacceptable that the results for an entire tournament are leaked before the first game even airs. this would never happen to any tournament that takes itself seriously. what happened in IPL is entirely a fundamental error.
IPL is also presenting itself wrong by making the players into generic nerds fighting each other like robots. the players themselves give no thoughts or input throughout day 1. no interviews, no discussions, only casters like TB and wheat typecasting them into something that casual gamers can relate with.
as a spectator, i like to know more about how player 'X' would have reacted to situation 'Y' and if he regrets playing build 'Z'. that stuff is critical to not only helping people appreciate such a deep game, but giving insight into what makes these players so supremely talented.
Why is the leaking of results a fundamental error? It was caused by negligence and to say it is a fundamental error means it will happen over and over again because it is due to the way they do things. If they use maps who hide results as well as not accidentally posting the results then it won't happen again. Was it a grave error? Sure it was. But it was in no way fundamental
And actually the insights that you are asking for are in the website.A lot of players are interviewed in the website very professionally. For example, catz were interviewed about his cheeses and why he does it and does he think it takes less skill. A few other players were also asked about what they think of catz's unorthodox style.
. By tying the interviews with the game, viewers can understand his mindset in doing so. I think that gives "insight to the players"
Oh and i feel that Dreamhack was the best tournament ever. Awesome games , players, productions, casters and the best HOST ever. Regardless of how MLG Dallas went, praises will still be sung about DH invitational.
it's a fundamental error because they didn't have the foresight to think that people can look at match history and deduce what happened over that long period. playing the whole tournament so far in advance just to get a dumb overlay graphic for each game that makes people rave about 'production value' is a stupid error.
i do agree that dreamhack has always been run exceptionally well for a live tournament dating before SC2 and we had to use octoshape lol.
You haven't actually been on the IPL website, have you? Or have 80% of the videos just not shown up on your screen? Everything you're asking for is right there.
Also, the spoiler thing is going to be avoided the next round. One round of spoilers against three walk overs in a week? I'll take the spoilers and just ignore the chat >.<
you haven't actually watched interviews, have you? or have you noticed that the only function each and every one of those videos serve is to hype the league and introduce the players (that we already know). it is not analysis or discussion about the actual game but rather more fluff and promotion.
it's great that they shoot for mass appeal but it makes this tournament into training wheels starcraft league.
in regards to spoilers, the entire bracket was leaked!
IGN's casting is far better than NASL's. No post game commentary... sometimes talking less is better, and IMO Gretorp and Incontrol have not learned to be terse.
I don't know about you but im very particular about quality and frame rate. If it's more attractive to the eye, I'll watch it. And if it's pleasing to the ears in quality, I'll listen to it. This is what the iPL has done that NASL needs to do if it wants to gain viewers. And as for the casters, people criticize casters without much more substance than : I want more analysis. I bet you if you put InControl saying the same exact things say djwheat was saying but incontrol just read it out, you would consider the analysis to be fine. People just want faces behind credibility and I think it's silly.
Anyone else find the way the hd vods come up weird? I mean the sd version comes up perfectly fine, but when you click hd it loads another page in the small window the sd version comes up in. Also for me the next game wouldn't come on after the first when watching in hd.
Other than that, everything looks phenomenal. Great job IGN!
ooook... so its 3 am, just finished a huge project for my class, the VODs are up for the IPL and I must say I am SUPER impressed by the infastructure of the VODs. I absolutely love the IGN player, i love how everything is so easy and accessible. and the best part is that you click on a series and once the first match is done, it autoloads up into the 2nd match. Absolutely no way to get accidentally spoiled in any way shape or form. NASL is gonna have their hands full if they wish to compete with this.
Holy moly, saw the VODs in HD :D and wasn't disappointed. The production quality was awesome. Definitely something I will use my time to follow later on. TB's casting was also good.
On April 22 2011 16:32 mufin wrote: ooook... so its 3 am, just finished a huge project for my class, the VODs are up for the IPL and I must say I am SUPER impressed by the infastructure of the VODs. I absolutely love the IGN player, i love how everything is so easy and accessible. and the best part is that you click on a series and once the first match is done, it autoloads up into the 2nd match. Absolutely no way to get accidentally spoiled in any way shape or form. NASL is gonna have their hands full if they wish to compete with this.
Oh, for me it shows a "Play again" button to go to the next VOD, also I have some strange framing issues with the video player... anyone else as well?
On April 22 2011 16:32 mufin wrote: ooook... so its 3 am, just finished a huge project for my class, the VODs are up for the IPL and I must say I am SUPER impressed by the infastructure of the VODs. I absolutely love the IGN player, i love how everything is so easy and accessible. and the best part is that you click on a series and once the first match is done, it autoloads up into the 2nd match. Absolutely no way to get accidentally spoiled in any way shape or form. NASL is gonna have their hands full if they wish to compete with this.
Oh, for me it shows a "Play again" button to go to the next VOD, also I have some strange framing issues with the video player... anyone else as well?
I have this problem with the HD VODs, but the SD ones work perfectly fine.
On April 22 2011 16:21 adeezy wrote: I don't know about you but im very particular about quality and frame rate. If it's more attractive to the eye, I'll watch it. And if it's pleasing to the ears in quality, I'll listen to it. This is what the iPL has done that NASL needs to do if it wants to gain viewers. And as for the casters, people criticize casters without much more substance than : I want more analysis. I bet you if you put InControl saying the same exact things say djwheat was saying but incontrol just read it out, you would consider the analysis to be fine. People just want faces behind credibility and I think it's silly.
I on the other hand do not care about video and sound quality beyond the basic watchable one. So NASL 480p is ok for me, sound is not, so hopefully they will fix it. On the other hand I care about quality of gameplay and I want more analysis. Which has all the substance necessary, for me the excitement is not in exploding visual things but in strategical subtleties, but since I am not top level player I won't catch all of them and for that you need knowledgeable caster. And no I do not judge by faces, but by their words. If they make sense and are right they gain credibility for the future.
But as I said I am not their target audience so ...
On April 22 2011 16:32 mufin wrote: ooook... so its 3 am, just finished a huge project for my class, the VODs are up for the IPL and I must say I am SUPER impressed by the infastructure of the VODs. I absolutely love the IGN player, i love how everything is so easy and accessible. and the best part is that you click on a series and once the first match is done, it autoloads up into the 2nd match. Absolutely no way to get accidentally spoiled in any way shape or form. NASL is gonna have their hands full if they wish to compete with this.
Oh, for me it shows a "Play again" button to go to the next VOD, also I have some strange framing issues with the video player... anyone else as well?
I have this problem with the HD VODs, but the SD ones work perfectly fine.
Yeah, SD works better in that respect. If I select HD it seems to open the webpage again in the video player with the player embedded in that. Don't know what exactly happens though
I mentioned this in the other thread, we'll work with the dev team tomorrow to see if we can come up a spoiler-free solution to being able to see later games.
The stream quality was amazing. I only have one complaint and that is there needs to be two casters. I love Wheat and TB, but it's just too much having them alone. What makes tournaments a lot of fun is the banter between casters. Get a color commentator in with each of them and IPL will be THE league outside of GSL. The production quality was just fantastic. I especially loved the stats after each game. Very cool.
On April 22 2011 14:33 Dommk wrote: I agree with the sentiment that IPL is doing what NASL wanted to do.
But as it is, NASL has a long road ahead of them. What they are doing is much bigger of a task than IPL. The way IPL has done it is much smater though, started small without a lot of hype then grow it.
It isn't like NASL is terrible, but IPL, IMO, will have greater success, just due to quality alone. Although I'm quite content watching just the games, a lot of people need more to draw them in, especially those who aren't enthusiasts already.
But the internet has a thing for quality, make great content and people will come. NASL already has a large following, if they take community feedback seriously then they are only going to get bigger.
In the future I think NASL will have to adopt the IGN approach, of free Vods w/ advertising and better production quality. But for now just fixing the video/sound issues and improving the casting will go a long way
For most of the IPL it had double the viewers of the NASL, 7 k viewers for a majority of the day is not a large following and they will not succeed with those numbers or even get by. I dont think they will succeed with 20k viewers either they were expecting to probably get more than TSL (40-50k at times) but aside from the first day were they had 20 something this just isnt happening people are turning away from the NASL in large numbers as there are better tournaments with better casters higher production value and very few errors. NASL is riddled with errors and terrible production, I wish there was a point where i could say it was okay during the NASL but they have yet to fix the framerate or the sound yet and those things just make it blaringly obvious how much work the NASL needs.
Not to mention their caster room is the most bland thing i have ever seen, i would prefer cool graphics and no view of the casters at all, then just a grey room that looks like its in somebody's basement, it literally is just completely grey and says NASL behind it, cant really get anymore bland than that, without having 2 guys just sitting in chairs in a black room with nothing in front of them, thats pretty much as bland as it gets.
IPL has done a fantastic job with production quality,and is an absolute joy to watch, i applaud them. NASL well they have alot of work to do, seems like everything is going wrong for them, i feel like i wasted 25 bucks, id prefer to just give my 25 bucks to IGN even though its free just because they have done such a fantastic job and seem more deserving of my money.
NASL is just another example of a really ambitious esports league failing (at least so far they are going to have to really step it up to turn peoples oppinions around) honestly the owners of NASL must feel like they are having their worst nightmare come true right now , all this money has to be given away for a tournament that isnt even pulling in 10k viewers most of time, uh oh.
On April 22 2011 17:28 edward.IGN wrote: Alright guys, for those of you that have been asking to jump to a specific match - you should be able to do this from the individual match pages found on the brackets page here - http://www.ign.com/ipl/starcraft2/tournaments/best-of-the-west
Let us know if you have any other questions!
I was really quite shocked to see that you could go straight to a specific match vod from the bracket. Ign is really raising the bar for NA SC2.
On April 22 2011 17:28 edward.IGN wrote: Alright guys, for those of you that have been asking to jump to a specific match - you should be able to do this from the individual match pages found on the brackets page here - http://www.ign.com/ipl/starcraft2/tournaments/best-of-the-west
Let us know if you have any other questions!
ah. But if you link it from the brackets, you'll get spoilers.
On April 22 2011 17:28 edward.IGN wrote: Alright guys, for those of you that have been asking to jump to a specific match - you should be able to do this from the individual match pages found on the brackets page here - http://www.ign.com/ipl/starcraft2/tournaments/best-of-the-west
Let us know if you have any other questions!
ah. But if you link it from the brackets, you'll get spoilers.
The age old Catch-22 - the idea is if you're looking for a specific match you're not as concerned as the end-result, because otherwise you'd just watch directly from the videos page
I have to admit that the IPL is what I imagined the NASL to be but the vods are free, the casters are brilliant, there are no sound and streaming issues and it is just all round feels and watches better.
What I really like is there no loooooooong play intros, you are straight into the game which is really refreshing and much needed for time scarce people like myself.
NASL and to a certain extent the MLG have a quite a way to catch up imho. Competition is great and it will only push all three to out do each other and up their quality.
On April 22 2011 17:28 edward.IGN wrote: Alright guys, for those of you that have been asking to jump to a specific match - you should be able to do this from the individual match pages found on the brackets page here - http://www.ign.com/ipl/starcraft2/tournaments/best-of-the-west
Let us know if you have any other questions!
Ahhhhh SPOLIER alert, Luckily I didnt see the outcome of the 2 matches I still have to watch .
The solo casting is fine for me. Analytical commentary is ok, but it is really annoying when people try to be analytical, and are way off. I'd prefer exercizing my own analytical skills during the game, and thinking for myself, instead of hearing a commentator guess what will happen. Just me.
On another note: I fully agree with the rest of the community- this league ate NASL alive. Superior quality, superior casters (yes, I think TotalBiscuit is the best caster in the industry, feel free to dissent, I could care less), superior animations, no need to pay, no 'no-shows'.
Sure, the players may not be as huge names are they are in the NASL, however the superior production value easily makes up for that.
Excellent work IGN. Very, very proud of your work. Not to flame NASL, but you desperately need to adopt their business model. It is simply more polished and well-rounded.
Note that I just watched the VODs, didn't get the live experience.
This thread is way overblown I think, or maybe everyone has such low expectations because of the NASL. What I saw of the VODs felt like a Youtube cast and doesn't seem to deserve the amount of accolades I'm reading here. The graphics and everything were slick and the post-game screen is a great idea, but that alone doesn't help how boring having just one caster is. Duos need to happen for "major" events like this, I think that was the primary reason it felt like a normal Youtube cast to me.
I like the idea of it, I like that this is just a test run, and I like that everything pretty much went well aside from the leaked tourny results and single-caster style.
However, this isn't the league I've been waiting for, not yet anyway. It doesn't have that "live" feel to me like the GSL does for example. I kinda want to see the casters, have them talk and analyze, have some cool hype like this seasons GSL intro videos to the Code S matches (shouldn't be hard with all that interview footage, with the production quality this sort of thing could be amazing), etc. Starting small is good, but I think the NASL is moving more in the right direction as far as how a league should look and feel.
I just feel like there should be *something* to get rid of the Youtube-y feel.
I didn't watch it "live" (well it is not live, everything is prerecorded), but watched some of the VODs. It is better production-wise then NASL but not as much better as one would get a feeling by reading this topic. Maybe stream had something VODs do not?!
I still think Dreamhack was far superior to both IPL and NASL and that is what all of them should strive for.
Almost every single post that says something bad about IGNPL. You have jumped in going OMG how dare you say something bad.
If it doesn't affect you sit down and stop making yourself look stupid by attacking everyone
Fairly sure I'm not the one taking offence at being told his opinion isn't pure internet gold. If you think that is 'attacking' then I can't help ya because it seems to me you're getting overly emotional and sensitive. When people eventually realise their opinion is one of many, many opinions and unless it contains useful constructive criticism them it won't be taken seriously, the happier we'll all be.
Im starting to watch the VODs atm and i like the quality and production values yes, but they're not off the charts by any means and theres room for improvement.
One of the intentions behind this event was to get e-sports in general and SC2 in specific to reach an untapped audience that uses IGN as a bridge to everything game related. Based on that i was expecting a much more refined presentation of the players and the game itself.
Also its perfectly understandable that for the 1st event the playerbase will be very "local" based. Basically they're all NA server players and it feels like its catering to the NA community leaving the rest on the side. Hopefully on future leagues that can be expanded.
Firts impressions:
- Cartoonish presentation instead of showing who are the persons behind the keyboard not a good idea in my personal opinion - Lackluster on providing players background and drawing in the viewer for something more than an online match - Great video quality on the VODs - Excellent video quality on the livestream - Good casting by all casters, but no proper background provided by any of them on who the players are.
So, i liked it quite a lot and it can only get better. The technical side of it seems to be close to mastered now IGN just needs to add a bit of a heart to it so it can feel "human".
Keep up the good work and thank you for the free VODs.
yeah production was quite nice. i liked the overlay and the interviews they threw out weeks before.
the problem is that i cant really watch totalbiscuit cast. he overlooks so much and doesnt go into stratagy at all. i enjoy NASL much more. because they have actuall pros commentating, they go into strat, they know the common/rising builds and i feel like that is what you need to do to bring in new people. its like poker on tv, they teach you every commercial break how the game works.
On April 22 2011 18:23 towerranger wrote: yeah production was quite nice. i liked the overlay and the interviews they threw out weeks before.
the problem is that i cant really watch totalbiscuit cast. he overlooks so much and doesnt go into stratagy at all. i enjoy NASL much more. because they have actuall pros commentating, they go into strat, they know the common/rising builds and i feel like that is what you need to do to bring in new people. its like poker on tv, they teach you every commercial break how the game works.
New people don't care about the metagame nor indepth analysis. You enjoy NASL much more because you are not new to the game. Different strokes for different folks.
The IPL is amazing. Since this thread is largely a commentary about the IPL vs the NASL I will say that the NASL has had some good matches, but the IPL is significantly better and you'd have to be mad not to realise it. In time they'll probably level out.
On April 22 2011 10:29 Doodsmack wrote: Also, it seems like some people in here don't want NASL to succeed. It's not about one over the other, guys.
It's not about not wanting NASL to succeed. Everyone wants great matches, features and competition for the hobby that we all enjoy. NASL so far has fell very short of the hype that was around it and what a lot of people were hoping for and expecting.
IGN in comparison, for production values and other associated markers, is incredibly above the quality that NASL has put out so far. It just seems like the disparity is great between that which is put out by amateurs trying to be professional, and those that have put in a great deal of time and chose intelligent avenues to go down.
/agree and if i have to choose one over the other like i did last night I will choose IPL every single time. Looking forward to Season 2+ with an open tournament like the GSL opens. with a comparable prize pool hopefully.
On April 22 2011 10:29 Doodsmack wrote: Also, it seems like some people in here don't want NASL to succeed. It's not about one over the other, guys.
It's not about not wanting NASL to succeed. Everyone wants great matches, features and competition for the hobby that we all enjoy. NASL so far has fell very short of the hype that was around it and what a lot of people were hoping for and expecting.
IGN in comparison, for production values and other associated markers, is incredibly above the quality that NASL has put out so far. It just seems like the disparity is great between that which is put out by amateurs trying to be professional, and those that have put in a great deal of time and chose intelligent avenues to go down.
/agree and if i have to choose one over the other like i did last night I will choose IPL every single time. Looking forward to Season 2+ with an open tournament like the GSL opens. with a comparable prize pool hopefully.
i agree. Thats another thing that IPL is doing right. The Open tournament for all but 4 spots. I believe this is the best way to allow equal opportunity for all players. Plus it doesn't allow players to sit on some crutch like the nasl allows. OSL/MSL in korea have it down pat i think nasl has to do the same. Players should have to keep earning their spot rather than have an ez in. I can't wait to watch more IPL!
On April 22 2011 18:23 towerranger wrote: yeah production was quite nice. i liked the overlay and the interviews they threw out weeks before.
the problem is that i cant really watch totalbiscuit cast. he overlooks so much and doesnt go into stratagy at all. i enjoy NASL much more. because they have actuall pros commentating, they go into strat, they know the common/rising builds and i feel like that is what you need to do to bring in new people. its like poker on tv, they teach you every commercial break how the game works.
New people don't care about the metagame nor indepth analysis. You enjoy NASL much more because you are not new to the game. Different strokes for different folks.
I think you do well, your play-by-play is the best of any play-by-play caster imo... better than djwheat kinda, but IPL does need an analytical/progamer to cast... we can't have ALL play by players.
On April 22 2011 18:27 TotalBiscuit wrote: New people don't care about the metagame nor indepth analysis.
That is a rather sweeping generalisation, aren't new people attracted to Day[9] because of exactly those two things?
I do however think your "energy" is fine to listen to, but I cringe whenever you say things along the lines of 'this is an odd place to put a pylon' when a person is putting it behind the smoke screen to gain vision of that area. This is not "indepth analysis" but rudimentary knowledge that all people who want to cast any games should have.
I really enjoyed your World of Warcraft work, especially your interview with Ekke and Awake a while back (I think that was you), but I keep thinking that you are out of your depth with professional games, but this can easily be addressed by putting you alongside an analysing commentator who would solve the one caster issue people are having with the IPL.
We cannot expect to have every event casted by prominent ex-BroodWar players who know every little intricacy of the game, but is expecting the new blood to have a decent level of understanding for the game they're promoting too much to ask?
:Edit: I should add that your play-by-play is absolutely fantastic to listen to.
hmm non dual casting is a bit of a bummer but TotalBiscuit did an awesome commentary on Idra's game (at least the first one which is the one I watched). I actually think IGN is really good as well. It's free too. Something I really like is that they don't show how long the VOD is, it's really spoiler protected.
On April 22 2011 18:23 towerranger wrote: yeah production was quite nice. i liked the overlay and the interviews they threw out weeks before.
the problem is that i cant really watch totalbiscuit cast. he overlooks so much and doesnt go into stratagy at all. i enjoy NASL much more. because they have actuall pros commentating, they go into strat, they know the common/rising builds and i feel like that is what you need to do to bring in new people. its like poker on tv, they teach you every commercial break how the game works.
New people don't care about the metagame nor indepth analysis. You enjoy NASL much more because you are not new to the game. Different strokes for different folks.
I think you do well, your play-by-play is the best of any play-by-play caster imo... better than djwheat kinda, but IPL does need an analytical/progamer to cast... we can't have ALL play by players.
There is an analyst/progamer, Painuser. HD/Painuser are doing the lion's share of the rest of the content, including the finals.
In this case, IPL wanted to put out a strong, polished showing in terms of production values and appeal to it's own audience. It is as they've said, a test-bed for them, their 'Clash of the Titans'. High audio quality is something that doesn't seem to get valued all that much, but if folks want eSports to get bigger, then they have to put a greater emphasis on production values. In this case, with this timeframe, it made more sense to grab 2 solo commentators and a duo team who could cast from the same studio (HD/Painuser live right next to each other). Everyone has heard the call for duo teams for Season 2 and we all agree with it, but it will have to be done in the same location with a proper setup that sounds good. TSL is amazing, but the audio quality and sync issues resulting from online co-casting a replay is probably it's biggest weakness of the very few it actually has.
That is a rather sweeping generalisation, aren't new people attracted to Day[9] because of exactly those two things? .
New people are attracted to Day9 because he is a teacher and they are his students. Day9 Dailies are not the same as tournament casts and shouldn't be treated as such. They want to get better at the game by learning, that's why they watch Day9. Doesn't hurt that he has a personality so magnetic that it generates it's own gravity well.
IGN is handling this really well, also. They aren't committing a TON of resources to it in case it doesn't do as well as estimated. It's a modest prize pool with very high production and can be appealing to people who might not play SC2. It seems like they're running a "beta" version of a league to see how it goes, to see if it can continue to prove profitable. Let's all show them as much love as possible so they continue with this absolutely wonderful league -- I can't imagine why anyone wouldn't want it to stay (being free with very good quality stream/VODs and players). Hopefully they can, in time, lure more high profile players, such as Koreans. The IPL is extremely exciting though -- they're really outdone themselves.
My Order is IGN=TSL>Dreamhack=GSL>>>>NASL. Non Korean players seam to make up much nicer and longer Games... Korean are to much timing focused and overall really boring (with some exception of course).
The IPL is amazing, I was completely stunned with joy as I tuned in tonight! I do think that the solo-casting was done very well but of course with just great casters, having 2 at once could never hurt :3
On April 22 2011 18:22 Escapist wrote: -SNIP- - Good casting by all casters, but no proper background provided by any of them on who the players are.
-SNIP-
This is so true. If casters would spend some time introducing players during the matches it would make the whole thing so much better (similar to how it is done during football broadcasts or at least how tastosis do it). Just do a bit of research about them and their play and results and present them in a way that they seem more human and alive. If we ever want to have sc2 grow the game needs to be as much about the competitors as the game itself. The Dreamhack "White-Ra, he cares" was a perfect example of that. When people watch Barcelona they watch it for the players as much for the results and the game on the field. I think Beckham showed us games are more then just about the game.
IGN is superb, It's really too bad that the result leaked :s
On April 22 2011 19:17 Spikeworld wrote: Non Korean players seam to make up much nicer and longer Games... Korean are to much timing focused and overall really boring (with some exception of course).
What do you base that on? I'm asking because many korean interviews claims it's the western timing based builds that have given them alot of problems.
def the best production ive seen in any scii broadcast, love the artwork, as someone mentioned very street fighter - GSL production is nice, but its just so cheesy to me
maybe we'll have those sweet osl/msl/proleague openers in scii soon!
On April 22 2011 19:28 SovSov wrote: i feel like the stream should of hit 15k+ viewers easily
im confused as to why it didnt.
the games were exciting and the production was awesome.
there wasn't a huge amount of hype behind it like the nasl. There was also the nasl,day9 daily and another event going on at the same time. i believe that ign had 11k viewers nasl had 8-9k and day9 had 3-4k.
On April 22 2011 19:17 Spikeworld wrote: Non Korean players seam to make up much nicer and longer Games... Korean are to much timing focused and overall really boring (with some exception of course).
What do you base that on? I'm asking because many korean interviews claims it's the western timing based builds that have given them alot of problems.
Well I mainly base it on my own opinion. Maybe its just because non koreans do more errors on both sides so the matches tend to be more exiting with much more back and forth and I feel like they experiment more.
On April 22 2011 19:28 SovSov wrote: i feel like the stream should of hit 15k+ viewers easily
im confused as to why it didnt.
the games were exciting and the production was awesome.
The league wasn't hyped too much, IGN is new to streaming and needs to build a fanbase(Yes, i know the reddit guys produced it), same time as nasl / day 9.
On April 22 2011 15:22 jmbthirteen wrote: Wait what? NASL has more money than IGN? Just because they have a bigger prise pool doesn't mean they have more money. IGN is a huge company that has way more money than NASL.
Also on that point, most importantly IGN has employees who work in fields such as video production etc. that translate over to running a tournament. The fact that IGN has the manpower with the right skills is one of the biggest differences between NASL.
Wow, I actually missed it last night but i've just watched the VoDs (Free omg) and it looks amazing. LOVE the graphics very street fighter :D can't wait too see the rest of it!
watched a lil bit, looked pretty sick, great quality of everything and nice artwork and stuff what i personally missed is knowledgeable casters. no offence but you know what i mean.
On April 22 2011 19:53 Diglett wrote: why are people talking shit about nasl? would you rather it not exist at all?
praise ipl by saying how ipl is good, not how other tourneys are bad.
not everyone is bashing nasl. However i don't blame people for being very unhappy with all the false promises and constant failure to deliver the product. how would you feel if you paid 25 bux for a HD pass and what you actually received was severely poor audio and choppy/laggy video, matches constantly being cancelled, and incredibly low production value(not referring to the sound or fps issues but that actual production of this content).
ah im back from my week ban IGN pro league was amazing was wishing i could post about it while the magic was happening. Honestly its like an eiffel tower above NASL i cant even be bothered to watch the NASL anymore although i am a subscriber
The sound quality and low framerate give me a headache unfortunately , ive heard a few other people say the same thing, wish they could just fix it but it must not be as easy of a problem as it should be (at least for them)
GO IPL its free and the quality is leaps and bounds above NASL player pool is not the greatest this season but with qualifers for season 2 there is nothign really to complain about since this is just a test season(wich is totally the way to go NASL should have done this to work out the kinks.)
On April 22 2011 18:22 Escapist wrote: -SNIP- - Good casting by all casters, but no proper background provided by any of them on who the players are.
-SNIP-
This is so true. If casters would spend some time introducing players during the matches it would make the whole thing so much better (similar to how it is done during football broadcasts or at least how tastosis do it). Just do a bit of research about them and their play and results and present them in a way that they seem more human and alive. If we ever want to have sc2 grow the game needs to be as much about the competitors as the game itself. The Dreamhack "White-Ra, he cares" was a perfect example of that. When people watch Barcelona they watch it for the players as much for the results and the game on the field. I think Beckham showed us games are more then just about the game.
This an odd criticism, considering I did go and research the players and provide information about play-style, team affiliation and recent tournament performance. It is not as if it was not done, I think you just wanted more than was given. Which is cool, that's totally doable and there's nothing stopping us doing more research and providing more colour if that's what people want. It was there though, just perhaps not enough of it.
I like NASL better than IPL. It's impossible to listen to TB. The street fighter slash screens are terrible, the players are not as good, and there's simply not as much on the line. 2.5k on the line for IPL, or 50k for NASL? 2.5k is nothing to scoff, but the stakes just simply arn't as high with something that IGN put together that looks cheesy. Also, as much as most people here who are below diamond and don't understand the game all that well, they probably like the dumbed down "OMG IT FLASHES AND DIES" from TB and Djwheat. Gretorp and Incontrol are intelligent and understand the game and actually provide INFORMATION *gasp* as to what's going on.
I dont understand why some people want an analytical caster? I think you should be alble to understand things by yoursefl and I prefer being entertained by a caster rather than listen a long boring analyse like Gretorp's one . Maybe its just me...
On April 22 2011 18:22 Escapist wrote: -SNIP- - Good casting by all casters, but no proper background provided by any of them on who the players are.
-SNIP-
This is so true. If casters would spend some time introducing players during the matches it would make the whole thing so much better (similar to how it is done during football broadcasts or at least how tastosis do it). Just do a bit of research about them and their play and results and present them in a way that they seem more human and alive. If we ever want to have sc2 grow the game needs to be as much about the competitors as the game itself. The Dreamhack "White-Ra, he cares" was a perfect example of that. When people watch Barcelona they watch it for the players as much for the results and the game on the field. I think Beckham showed us games are more then just about the game.
This an odd criticism, considering I did go and research the players and provide information about play-style, team affiliation and recent tournament performance. It is not as if it was not done, I think you just wanted more than was given. Which is cool, that's totally doable and there's nothing stopping us doing more research and providing more colour if that's what people want. It was there though, just perhaps not enough of it.
Another possibility is that people didnt notice those informations and have labeled some casters as "shallow and emotional casters" without rechecking their own judgement for possible improvement. I would say it is very easily possible to get "carried away" by your style of commentating and not notice the "solid info" because it was presented as part of an entertaining sentence or two. Try to sound dull and boring when you do that next time ... jk.
The IPL is awesome from its production value, the casters have the potential to draw people in and its free. Perfect combination, but sadly the conflicting timing with the NASL and Day9 daily can cause problems like today, when Justin TV broke down for all three - at least partially for non-US viewers - for some time.
Overall, the production in the IPL is really good.
I really can't look at the overlay / splash screens without thinking Street Fighter 4....and I'm actually kind of torn whether I like it or not. There's nothing wrong with it, but it just kinda rubs me the wrong way.
I think the biggest problem IPL has is with the casting. No matter who you love / hate, solo casting is a tough job and allows people to focus on the faults of a single caster. So I'd love to see IPL go to a double caster set-up next time. Maybe even just commit to 2 casters GSL-style.
Loving the top notch quality on the whole league so far, but just like others have said, duo-casters would be much appreciated. So far the casters are doing quite alright on their own, but perhaps go for two casters on the matches from semifinals and onwards?
The production value is amazing, this thread inspired me to go and watch it and everything is great with the website, the free HD video, the casting is okay but I think two casters would improve the games, it will make it a bit more exciting and entertaining but its still really good.
I am glad IGN are on board with this and I hope they are looking at this thread, it will only get better!
The production is great, but that doesn't really matter to me when the whole tournament is over. Also there are just clear standouts, who are a level above all the other players. Even though it has already been spoiled it was clear just looking at the brackets who was going to go far in the tournament.
On April 22 2011 10:12 Zerker wrote: - Quality is 1080p, Seriuosly it looks like your watching a dvd!
Is this a joke? :lol :lol
The word you're looking for is Blu-Ray. DVD doesn't even come close to being 1080p (or 720p). DVD resolution is the same as the NASL free stream (480p), or the marginally better 576p for Europeans.
On April 22 2011 21:27 CptCutter wrote: i refuse to watch it because hd and pain user are casting it.
Amazing piece of information you brought to the discusion
I find it weird people attack and belittle sc2 competitions based on the people talking about the game they are watching. Wonder when sound reduction technology will be invented to help these people remove the annoyance...
Love the league and the casters. They offer HD vods for free unlike some people, and in my opinion, their generosity will result in a much more popular league than NASL. The only weak part about this league is that they don't have the quality of players that NASL has, but I'm sure that next season will be much more epic.
I watched the vods of IdrA vs. Fenix just now. Is this going to stay free? If it is, there is no reason to watch anything else. GSL + IPL will keep me busy and entertained, I can say these two are the current go to tournaments to watch. On an unrelated note, TB seems to have gotten better casting. At least he had some energy while casting. I am looking forward to more. (especially in the department of 'higher quality' of players)
I've watched Sheth Axslav and Idra Fenix so far and its pretty awesome. I just wish there was the usual 2 casters per match, but TotalBiscuit and Wheat did great
what i enjoyed the most is actually (by far) the overall design the animations intros and those kind of things like the short animation if someone wins and the statistics after the match it just makes the whole thing soooo much more professional
I think the VODs should allow you to jump between the different games in the set you are watching. If you click out of the video you have to re-watch or skip the first game. Everything else with the website layout is fantastic!
Theres really nothing much that i dislike about IPL, it's great so far and i'm really impressed by how you can filter the vods by players/race/commentators. The only thing i would like is perhaps dual commentaries, would make it pretty much perfect.
I understand the noob friendly approach of IPL and I like them for that. As was said on State of the Game it's important to bring new people onboard. And I think IPL is taking the right approach to accomplish that goal. They still should use two commentators in my opinion which I think most people prefer (I could be wrong).
The NASL on the other hand does not take that noob friendly approach, and that is what I prefer to see. For now they have the better players (which might be the most important thing) and commentators whose style just suits me better. NASL might be harder to watch for new viewers, but I think that is a good thing. Imagine watching a soccer tournament where the commentator explains the rules every single game. It would be soooooo annoying. So I think for experienced viewers the NASL for now is better. Yes they have audio problems and stuff, but that are problems that are clearly defined and can (and I think will) definately will be solved.
IPL and NASL in my eyes don't totally overlap in what they are trying to do or which type of viewer they are trying to reach. Grossly oversimplified, IPL is more for noobs, NASL more for the experienced viewer, but everyone can watch and enjoy both. So saying one in general is better than the other is unfair in my opinion. Some prefer NASL, some prefer IPL and that is as it should be.
I didn't say much about stream quality because in my opinion that is the least important criteria. Well as long as both streams are above a certain standard. In the end the quality and substance of what is shown on that stream is the deciding factor.
On April 22 2011 21:56 RedHelix wrote: Theres really nothing much that i dislike about IPL, it's great so far and i'm really impressed by how you can filter the vods by players/race/commentators. The only thing i would like is perhaps dual commentaries, would make it pretty much perfect.
Just to reiterate, dual same-room commentators is definitely a very high priority for Season 2, especially when appealing to the Teamliquid demographic.
I've been a little frustrated by the VOD system. After watching the NASL vods where you can resize the window as much as you want, this fixed size massive window is frustrating. And whenever I try to turn on HD, it tries to open the video in the frame the video is already in, and everything on the corners gets cut off. Id like to see that get improved.
Gotta love TB though. Never have understood the hate for the casters on youtube. Also like the screen they show at the end of each game.
Production quality of IGN was really top-tier. I will be watching this and GSL. NASL is too amateurish for my taste. Two commentators are better than 1, but seeing as this will be put on priority I'm sure the IGN league will grow to become even better
No matter how good the overall production is, you can't really get around the fact that the playerbase/competition in IPL is weak and there are only 3-4 players with a remotely legitimate shot at winning the thing, something you can't say for either the TSL or the NASL, but that's the byproduct of limiting yourself to the NA server.
On April 22 2011 22:10 flipstar wrote: Production quality of IGN was really top-tier. I will be watching this and GSL. NASL is too amateurish for my taste. Two commentators are better than 1, but seeing as this will be put on priority I'm sure the IGN league will grow to become even better
Can you explain a bit what you mean by "too amateurish"? The stream / audio problems? Because in everything else I think the NASL is very professional.
On April 22 2011 22:14 Asshat wrote: No matter how good the overall production is, you can't really get around the fact that the playerbase/competition in IPL is weak and there are only 3-4 players with a remotely legitimate shot at winning the thing, something you can't say for either the TSL or the NASL, but that's the byproduct of limiting yourself to the NA server.
IGN have said Season 1 should be viewed as their Clash of the Titans, a warmup and opportunity to test concepts for Season 2. IPL is not a long tournament and work on Season 2 has already begun.
On April 22 2011 18:22 Escapist wrote: -SNIP- - Good casting by all casters, but no proper background provided by any of them on who the players are.
-SNIP-
This is so true. If casters would spend some time introducing players during the matches it would make the whole thing so much better (similar to how it is done during football broadcasts or at least how tastosis do it). Just do a bit of research about them and their play and results and present them in a way that they seem more human and alive. If we ever want to have sc2 grow the game needs to be as much about the competitors as the game itself. The Dreamhack "White-Ra, he cares" was a perfect example of that. When people watch Barcelona they watch it for the players as much for the results and the game on the field. I think Beckham showed us games are more then just about the game.
This an odd criticism, considering I did go and research the players and provide information about play-style, team affiliation and recent tournament performance. It is not as if it was not done, I think you just wanted more than was given. Which is cool, that's totally doable and there's nothing stopping us doing more research and providing more colour if that's what people want. It was there though, just perhaps not enough of it.
Hey Mate, you did an excellent job on the Vods I've heard. You and the whole production crew should be proud of what you've produced
On April 22 2011 22:00 DocHoliday wrote: I prefer the NASL, at least for now.
I understand the noob friendly approach of IPL and I like them for that. As was said on State of the Game it's important to bring new people onboard. And I think IPL is taking the right approach to accomplish that goal. They still should use two commentators in my opinion which I think most people prefer (I could be wrong).
The NASL on the other hand does not take that noob friendly approach, and that is what I prefer to see. For now they have the better players (which might be the most important thing) and commentators whose style just suits me better. NASL might be harder to watch for new viewers, but I think that is a good thing. Imagine watching a soccer tournament where the commentator explains the rules every single game. It would be soooooo annoying. So I think for experienced viewers the NASL for now is better. Yes they have audio problems and stuff, but that are problems that are clearly defined and can (and I think will) definately will be solved.
IPL and NASL in my eyes don't totally overlap in what they are trying to do or which type of viewer they are trying to reach. Grossly oversimplified, IPL is more for noobs, NASL more for the experienced viewer, but everyone can watch and enjoy both. So saying one in general is better than the other is unfair in my opinion. Some prefer NASL, some prefer IPL and that is as it should be.
I didn't say much about stream quality because in my opinion that is the least important criteria. Well as long as both streams are above a certain standard. In the end the quality and substance of what is shown on that stream is the deciding factor.
Myself as an experienced veiwer and player, I am still a huge sucker for the HD and despite the higher skill quality in NASL, still found myself watching IPL the whole time.
I think that in a fairly short amount of time, NASL will have improved its production value and stream quality greatly, and will come to blow IPL out of the water overall as a tournament. The people whining about NASL because they aren't patient enough to give it a couple of weeks will be biting their words when the tournament is going down to the wire, there is an epic amount of money at stake, and the best players in the world are duking it out in person. Meanwhile, IPL will have solo casters who provide zero analysis whatsoever and games that were played a week beforehand. NASL will have Chill, Day9, and probably Artosis guest-casting. Let's be honest, the excitement of teh final rounds of NASL will be very intense, and memories of spoiled brats on TL complaining about their "wasted money" will be distant.
I have the same problem. When the HD game loaded inside the frame I copied the URL and opened the game in a new window. Then after the game finished I typed changed the URL to game 2/3 to get to the next game. Quite irritating.
Really nice production and commentary so far, i'm lovin it!
But I was watching Idra vs Fenix and after Game 1 was done it loaded Game 2 (really nice and smooth switch) but the black/white "underlay" showed: IPL: Set 4 - EGIdrA vs FnaticFenix- Game 1 instead of Game 2. You might want to have a look at this
On April 22 2011 22:00 DocHoliday wrote: I prefer the NASL, at least for now.
I understand the noob friendly approach of IPL and I like them for that. As was said on State of the Game it's important to bring new people onboard. And I think IPL is taking the right approach to accomplish that goal. They still should use two commentators in my opinion which I think most people prefer (I could be wrong).
The NASL on the other hand does not take that noob friendly approach, and that is what I prefer to see. For now they have the better players (which might be the most important thing) and commentators whose style just suits me better. NASL might be harder to watch for new viewers, but I think that is a good thing. Imagine watching a soccer tournament where the commentator explains the rules every single game. It would be soooooo annoying. So I think for experienced viewers the NASL for now is better. Yes they have audio problems and stuff, but that are problems that are clearly defined and can (and I think will) definately will be solved.
IPL and NASL in my eyes don't totally overlap in what they are trying to do or which type of viewer they are trying to reach. Grossly oversimplified, IPL is more for noobs, NASL more for the experienced viewer, but everyone can watch and enjoy both. So saying one in general is better than the other is unfair in my opinion. Some prefer NASL, some prefer IPL and that is as it should be.
I didn't say much about stream quality because in my opinion that is the least important criteria. Well as long as both streams are above a certain standard. In the end the quality and substance of what is shown on that stream is the deciding factor.
Myself as an experienced veiwer and player, I am still a huge sucker for the HD and despite the higher skill quality in NASL, still found myself watching IPL the whole time.
It's like when I'm looking for movies to download (I don't use Netflix), I'd rather watch a movie on my B-List that has DVD/BluRay quality rather than a movie on my A-List that is a Telesync rip from a camcorder in a movie theather. A product can be hyped and inherently good, but if it is not presentable to a general audience with appeal, the true value of the product is easily lost in translation if the presentation is poor.
On April 22 2011 18:22 Escapist wrote: -SNIP- - Good casting by all casters, but no proper background provided by any of them on who the players are.
-SNIP-
This is so true. If casters would spend some time introducing players during the matches it would make the whole thing so much better (similar to how it is done during football broadcasts or at least how tastosis do it). Just do a bit of research about them and their play and results and present them in a way that they seem more human and alive. If we ever want to have sc2 grow the game needs to be as much about the competitors as the game itself. The Dreamhack "White-Ra, he cares" was a perfect example of that. When people watch Barcelona they watch it for the players as much for the results and the game on the field. I think Beckham showed us games are more then just about the game.
This an odd criticism, considering I did go and research the players and provide information about play-style, team affiliation and recent tournament performance. It is not as if it was not done, I think you just wanted more than was given. Which is cool, that's totally doable and there's nothing stopping us doing more research and providing more colour if that's what people want. It was there though, just perhaps not enough of it.
Uff, I am sorry if I offended you. I actually didn't come yet to the VODs that you casted. DJwheat for sure didn't offer anything more. Actually my post is not a complaint, just a suggestion to make this even better. At the moment I feel IPL has the most chance to make something happen (at least in US) so if there is a way to make the casting and production even better it would be to bring us the human story behind the players. If you been watching GSL this season the video they done on MKP was just beautiful. I do not suggest that IPL does something like that now (but they could eventually if IPL becomes much bigger), but casters giving little tidbits of personal info about players during casts would go a long way to make people that are not players of SC2 interested in watching.
Having just watched some of the VODs, I can honestly say I think the IGNProLeague is awesome! I especially enjoyed the casting of TotalBiscuit. The games were fun to watch. The thing that really sticks out about this proleague is the production. It is unique compared to GSL or NASL. It strives to be different. For example, the animated pictures of the players. I feel like watching the IPL is an experience, which I don't feel for NASL. I feel like NASL is more mundane, similar to watching a livestream. IPL, however, stands out. I REALLY look forward to seeing more. Keep up the great work, guys!
On April 22 2011 20:38 zs3000 wrote: I like NASL better than IPL. It's impossible to listen to TB. The street fighter slash screens are terrible, the players are not as good, and there's simply not as much on the line. 2.5k on the line for IPL, or 50k for NASL? 2.5k is nothing to scoff, but the stakes just simply arn't as high with something that IGN put together that looks cheesy. Also, as much as most people here who are below diamond and don't understand the game all that well, they probably like the dumbed down "OMG IT FLASHES AND DIES" from TB and Djwheat. Gretorp and Incontrol are intelligent and understand the game and actually provide INFORMATION *gasp* as to what's going on.
NASL by far a better SC2 experiance.
I would reckon that it's the other way around for a more experienced player that you wouldn't need to rely on commentary to tell you what is happening in the game.
Hadn't listened to TB before, but I nearly died laughing. Some may hate him, but i got three new people watching and enjoying the commentating he did. He appeals to new players or watchers.
On April 22 2011 21:27 CptCutter wrote: i refuse to watch it because hd and pain user are casting it.
Amazing piece of information you brought to the discusion
I find it weird people attack and belittle sc2 competitions based on the people talking about the game they are watching. Wonder when sound reduction technology will be invented to help these people remove the annoyance...
Watching a tournament with the no sound at all is not really all that interesting though. Commentary is pretty important to help make it interesting to watch.
On April 22 2011 10:17 Eppa! wrote: Having no analytical commentators is pretty annoying.
A couple of points were kind of painful to listen to, if you know the basics of SC2. I'll give them the benefit of the doubt, though, because I know slips of the tongue can happen. I highly enjoyed what I saw last night.
Well game 2 starts automatically once game 1 ends. So just open game 1 and click to last 5s.
Except that it doesn't do that for a lot of people. I had exactly the same issue, and a number of people in the LR thread have commented on it as well. I think it works for some sets, but I tried to watch the idra-fenix match and ran into this issue where the next set did not start.
I love this so much. I bought a pass for NASL but the sound quality is so bad there it hurts my ears. The commentators seriously sound like they are talking through tin cans. So I'm not gonna bother watching NASL anymore and switched to IPL and what a treat that is. Awesome commentators, very good quality of sound and picture. More then I even expected! Hats of to you ppl from IPL!
I don't really see why people are bashing NASL. Yes, IGN's production is very nice, and other than the solo caster is will be an amazing tourny. Unfortunately, the winner was leaked before the first set of games, and if you want to compare, every mistake the NASL made combined is nowhere near as tragic as that.
I really hope they get a second caster in for season 2, and avoid future leaks. If they do, IGN will be well worth the watch!
On April 22 2011 22:40 -Archangel- wrote: Uff, I am sorry if I offended you. I actually didn't come yet to the VODs that you casted. DJwheat for sure didn't offer anything more. Actually my post is not a complaint, just a suggestion to make this even better. At the moment I feel IPL has the most chance to make something happen (at least in US) so if there is a way to make the casting and production even better it would be to bring us the human story behind the players. If you been watching GSL this season the video they done on MKP was just beautiful. I do not suggest that IPL does something like that now (but they could eventually if IPL becomes much bigger), but casters giving little tidbits of personal info about players during casts would go a long way to make people that are not players of SC2 interested in watching.
You didn't offend anyone, it was just a curious criticism. However I'll take it as, people want more colour and player history, which makes total sense, so I'll try and integrate that into future casts.
On April 22 2011 22:00 DocHoliday wrote: I prefer the NASL, at least for now.
I understand the noob friendly approach of IPL and I like them for that.
Its not a "noob friendly approach" but rather a "viewer friendly approach". You can even be an expert at the game and still watch - and enjoy - the IPL. These things arent excluding each other. If you go about it like that other dude here in the thread who says "HD and PainUser are casting so I dont watch the IPL" you are the arrogant one and not the IPL. There have been suggestions for improvement of bad casters for other leagues, so why not for the IPL? Because its the "noob tournament"? If you say that you are kidding yourself, because the players are "the usual suspects" of top level players (with the focus on "the west", i.e. no Koreans).
On April 22 2011 22:00 DocHoliday wrote: IPL and NASL in my eyes don't totally overlap in what they are trying to do or which type of viewer they are trying to reach. Grossly oversimplified, IPL is more for noobs, NASL more for the experienced viewer, but everyone can watch and enjoy both. So saying one in general is better than the other is unfair in my opinion. Some prefer NASL, some prefer IPL and that is as it should be.
I didn't say much about stream quality because in my opinion that is the least important criteria. Well as long as both streams are above a certain standard. In the end the quality and substance of what is shown on that stream is the deciding factor.
It should be pretty obvious that the IPL and the NASL dont overlap, because the formats are totally different and one of them has Koreans while the other focuses (deliberately) on "white guys". All this "IPL is for noobs, NASL is for pros" is just a lot of elitist nonsense.
On April 22 2011 22:28 Doodsmack wrote: I think that in a fairly short amount of time, NASL will have improved its production value and stream quality greatly, and will come to blow IPL out of the water overall as a tournament. The people whining about NASL because they aren't patient enough to give it a couple of weeks will be biting their words when the tournament is going down to the wire, there is an epic amount of money at stake, and the best players in the world are duking it out in person. Meanwhile, IPL will have solo casters who provide zero analysis whatsoever and games that were played a week beforehand. NASL will have Chill, Day9, and probably Artosis guest-casting. Let's be honest, the excitement of teh final rounds of NASL will be very intense, and memories of spoiled brats on TL complaining about their "wasted money" will be distant.
So on top of predicting the future, you're saying only NASL will improve and IPL won't. Bitter much?
On April 22 2011 22:55 Jonstah wrote: I don't really see why people are bashing NASL. Yes, IGN's production is very nice, and other than the solo caster is will be an amazing tourny. Unfortunately, the winner was leaked before the first set of games, and if you want to compare, every mistake the NASL made combined is nowhere near as tragic as that.
I really hope they get a second caster in for season 2, and avoid future leaks. If they do, IGN will be well worth the watch!
Hahah I didn't even know that happened, but that's hilarious, the full bracket for the thing is just a google search away. GJ to the site that got the info.
All I gotta say is...damn, our community is blessed right now to have all these amazing leagues/tournaments to watch. So many great games every night of the week. Can't wait to see where all of this is after a couple months - so excited!
On April 22 2011 23:04 Corrik wrote: If IPL production quality was merged with the NASL player base and the GSL in depth player videos... We would have the best of all worlds.
I have thought about a "streamlining" of the Starcraft leagues by merging them on one channel ... at least NASL and IPL ... but sadly they are separate businesses and there are always "personal egos" (of the companies) involved, so it wont work.
On April 22 2011 22:51 snailz wrote: hats down, but please pair TotalBiscuit and DJWheat together to make it even better than it already is.
Nah ... get a TB + TLO combo for this. TLO was hilarious at his casts with Day9 and he would bring the "expertise" to the commentary. Even though TB sleeps / works on an EST schedule it might be a bit hard to merge his schedule with DJWheat.
P.S.: I like the IPLs approach to VODs with NOT having a jump button to the 2nd / 3rd game as these things spoil part of the results.
The commentary was awesome! Of course, some of this might just be the fact that I love the british accent (thumb's up, TB!) and of course, djWheat is amazing as always.
I think the street fighter-type graphics was really cool but I wonder - I think the WP.org guys did a great job but I thought I read/heard somewhere that NASL was going to use those guys too? Is that true? If so, I can only hope that the NASL quality will get better!
The production value is goddamn amazing, best quality possible, running incredibly smooth. I get iphonelow quality on NASL on J.tv and then IPL gives me free 1080p? How is that even possible?
As for the games, they weren't that great, and the tournament doesn't have such huge names, BUT it's only the "beta tournament", for testing things and setting them straight, in that sense, it's AMAZING. I'm happy, it's such an awesome time to be an SC2 fan, I can just sit and watch all day long, I've seriously stopped watching any TV at all lol.
This is awesome, thanks IGN. And with qualifier tournament it will only get better.
EDIT: Also, results leaking is unacceptable, this cannot happen again. But to be fair it also happened to the NASL lol (Showing game 3 of ClouD vs Painuser first),
On April 22 2011 23:00 Rabiator wrote: It should be pretty obvious that the IPL and the NASL dont overlap, because the formats are totally different and one of them has Koreans while the other focuses (deliberately) on "white guys". All this "IPL is for noobs, NASL is for pros" is just a lot of elitist nonsense.
It focus's on North American server players, playing out of North America. If MC lived here, I'm sure they would invite him, don't say it focuses on white guys, it not a racial thing.
And people are talking like the players in the league are terrible players, 12/16 are playing in the NASL. and Minigun was like one of the last 2 cut. If they opened it up to Europe it would be great, KR to NA lag can be almost unplayable, or not bad, it varies wildly. Some of the NASL players seem to not have terrible lag, others can't stay in the game.
On April 22 2011 12:38 DirtYLOu wrote: IPL >>>>>> NASL
And to think that NASL has SO MUCH more money, and still IPL's production is better...
Wait what? NASL has more money than IGN? Just because they have a bigger prise pool doesn't mean they have more money. IGN is a huge company that has way more money than NASL.
I think NASL should've taken 300,000$ from their price pool and dropped on their production instead. Their "amazing" studio has a static camera pointing at a desk with a piece of cloth behind it.
On April 22 2011 22:47 snailz wrote: hats down, but please pair TotalBiscuit and DJWheat together to make it even better than it already is.
Wat? No. DJWheat cannot stop once he starts talking and that will mean we will hear much less of TB
Ever heard day9 featuring wheat? Wheat is a pro-caster and knows exactly how to act with a partner.
Yeah you're absolutely right, Wheat has the experience to adapt to any co-casting situation, however I think if you're going to co-cast, you should use play-by-play/analyst combos not play-by-play/play-by-play, because it does a disservice to the part of your audience that wants indepth information. You can at least have an excuse for focusing on a particular style when you're solo-casting, but not when there's two of you.
Meanwhile, IPL will have solo casters who provide zero analysis whatsoever and games that were played a week beforehand.
You don't seem to understand how IPL works. It's a 16 man tournament double-elim, we'll be done in few days and working on the much larger Season 2 with qualifiers and a dual-casting roster. If you would like to know more about how IPL works, there's an FAQ on the site.
On April 22 2011 22:47 snailz wrote: hats down, but please pair TotalBiscuit and DJWheat together to make it even better than it already is.
Wat? No. DJWheat cannot stop once he starts talking and that will mean we will hear much less of TB
Ever heard day9 featuring wheat? Wheat is a pro-caster and knows exactly how to act with a partner.
Well, what I heard was DJWheat talking most of the time while Day9 getting a chance here and there to give some analysis and say something funny. Since DJWheat and TB are both play-by-play casters they both need to be the guy that talks most of the time, and no offense to DJWheat (I think he is a great caster) but TB is more interesting to listen and brings more energy into his casts (well that is from before, I have not had the time to listen to TB in IPL)
The quality was really sick for a free stream definitely of GSL quality or higher. I was experiencing a little bit of choppiness but from what most people have posted that seems to have been on my end. Also the graphics/transitions and what have you were really well done and gave the whole thing a professional look.
Looking forward to the rest of the tournament fa sho.
Top 5 reasons why IGN IPL is awesome, and honestly.....Probably the death of the NASL. 1)FREE 1080p live streaming. Which was flawless last night. 2)FREE 1080p vods, which have been awesome 3) Better tournament format IMO. I understand that the NASL will be more down to the wire closer to the end of the divisional series. But should you really have ANY fluff? 4) Better production value. I know alot of people are saying "But NASL doesn't have the money that IGN does, and it's only 5 guys working the NASL" which is true. But does that mean I should watch something of lesser quality, while something of higher quality is on the next channel? 5) Caster rotation. Even though I would like to see them pair up the casters. I think the casters they have are much much better than gretorp and Incontrol, and honestly I am really not a fan of Gretorp or incontrol. But of course this is just my opinion. No malice, I just don't really like their casting styles.
The only thing I think NASL has over IGN is the player pool. But at the same time, I think their tournament format nullifies the allure of the player pool they have. Feel free to agree or disagree, but please no flaming as once again; These are my OPINIONS
The visual/audio quality of the IPL was handsdown fantastic!
Dj Wheat is a really talented casting personality, as well, but he needs a co-caster to keep things spicy. I hope the IPL adds another caster for deeper analysis.... and the post-fight interviews! Bam--just like live boxing, baby!
Everyone is talking about the NASL because (1) they're in conflicting time spots, so they are fighting over the same viewerships, and (2) they are both non-LAN-based leagues, which mean that the recording and broadcasting should be similar.
The quality of the IPL makes NASL look amateur, at best.
The NASL was really hyped up, and generated high expectations as to the production quality. They have consistently under-delivered those promises, and we can't help to think that the quality of their streams should be comparable to the IPL's.
I fear that, should the NASL not improve the quality of their stream, it will be overshadowed by the IPL, and that is a legitimate concern that many people in this thread have been voicing.
It's too bad, because the amount of funding behind the NASL is exactly what the e-sports scene needs to gather a bigger fan-base, and the organization will likely succumb to a competitor that offers less payout to professional players.
Just from watching an hour of last nights IPL, I'm very excited. Granted I don't watch too much of streams at night but they just pack more action in than NASL. I don't need to hear all these introductions before matchs and map analysis. I've played the maps and seen the players many times. I think IPL lends itself to the active starcraft player/fan very well. If I have 1-2 hours to watch a stream at night It'll be IPL > NASL just because I get that much more action and less talk.
On April 22 2011 23:23 FunnelC4kes wrote: Dj Wheat is a really talented casting personality, as well, but he needs a co-caster to keep things spicy. I hope the IPL adds another caster for deeper analysis.... and the post-fight interviews! Bam--just like live boxing, baby.
They already said that they will have dual casters for season 2. They only have the single casters for season 1 (the test season)
VOD flaws: If you accidentally click on the browser window outside the video, you lose the loaded vod in progress and it goes back to the beginning. If you do this on game 2 or game 3, it will take you back to game 1 and you have no convenient way of skipping straight to a certain game. Please add a next game or game selection button to the vod player.. And learn from Gom by keeping a 3rd game "shell" for every series regardless of whether it goes 2 or 3 games.
Also, the Menu function doesn't do anything useful for me
I too was very impressed by the stream yesterday, especially considering it was their first time. Very high quality in multiple areas. Mad props, keep it up !
Ok, can somebody give me an example of the good in depth strategical analysis that people think is so critical to casting and that IGN is missing? The only caster who has educated me in ways that I would not be able to gleen from simply watching the match is Artosis, and it still happens extremely infrequently.
Am I the only one who does not enjoy casters like TB, Husky, HDStarcraft etc.?
It seems to me that they try really hard to say something at all times or pretend that there is a lot of action in every second of the game. Endless stream of words and non-stop talking is not what I consider high-level commentating. There is a really hectic feel about the game with casts like that.
I really like the Artosis / Tasteless combination in the GSL or the way Day9 "casts" his dailies. That is really pleasant to watch and listen. It's calm and analytic most of the time, but still energetic when there is action and they even throw in a few jokes to spice it up.
On April 22 2011 23:31 teacash wrote: VOD flaws: If you accidentally click on the browser window outside the video, you lose the loaded vod in progress and it goes back to the beginning. If you do this on game 2 or game 3, it will take you back to game 1 and you have no convenient way of skipping straight to a certain game. Please add a next game or game selection button to the vod player.. And learn from Gom by keeping a 3rd game "shell" for every series regardless of whether it goes 2 or 3 games.
Also, the Menu function doesn't do anything useful for me
Came here to post exactly this, the website is pretty but not at all functional, and I have a slower connection and tend to let VODs preload before i press play, so if i do accidently click off the screen and lose the vods progress, it's a massive pain. Also, i can't even work out how to get onto games 2/3 of the series.. it doesnt seem to be clear although maybe i'm just being dense.
On a positive note, i love the production and the design, stream quality is excellent as well.
On April 22 2011 23:45 Strauss wrote: Incontrol hyped NASL for like six months and it was smashed by a tournament nobody even heard of 2 months ago GG, fatty
This just fucking pisses me off so much. What have you done? Nothing.
On April 22 2011 23:48 Stiluz wrote: I am really impressed with IPL, it makes me regret those 25$ spent on the NASL subscription, since IPL is free.
Yeah same here. The production quality of IPL really blew me away. NASL has the much better roster, but the first week let me down so much that I haven't bothered to tune into the last few days. I basically just wasted $25. I honestly hope both leagues thrive, but NASL really needs to step their game up. What we were given hasn't lived up to a quarter of the hype and it's really unfortunate.
More on topic though, I'm really excited to keep watching IPL and I can't wait to see what these guys are able to do with season 2!
On April 22 2011 23:45 Mr. Knuff wrote: Am I the only one who does not enjoy casters like TB, Husky, HDStarcraft etc.?
It seems to me that they try really hard to say something at all times or pretend that there is a lot of action in every second of the game. Endless stream of words and non-stop talking is not what I consider high-level commentating. There is a really hectic feel about the game with casts like that.
I really like the Artosis / Tasteless combination in the GSL or the way Day9 "casts" his dailies. That is really pleasant to watch and listen. It's calm and analytic most of the time, but still energetic when there is action and they even throw in a few jokes to spice it up.
I love TB's style personally. His game knowledge (or lack thereof) makes it a little difficult to listen to him or for me to consider him a favorite, but I still love the style and think if he put some serious time in learning the game so he could be an amazing caster. You could also copy-paste DJWheat for TB in what I just said, but he does have a decent amount of game knowledge by comparison.
IPL and NASL don't compete for me. I just tune in to the players I want to see. If Sheth or Idra are playing IPL then I'm watching that, if they're playing NASL then I'm watching that. I love this situation because it makes me feel much more motivated to watch the games. It's like I have a 'home team' I can follow rather than seeing a bunch of games that are entertaining, but lack an investment in me. I personally really don't care if Incontrol or Cruncher wins (no offense to either player) as they're not players I follow. So being able to tune out and watch a zerg I DO follow in another league for that time is just amazing to me.
I really wish someone would put together a quick and dirty guide to help casters with game knowledge, though if anyone but a pro did it I think it'd be ignored and/or flamed for coming from someone who doesn't cast. Just stuff like how to identify common builds, how to evaluate positioning, understanding some of the mid/late game tactical choices, some tips on evaluating which side is stronger in a fight, why someone might pick a certain expansion spot, and stuff like that.
Positives: - Learned from others' mistakes - Limited to NA only, minimizes lag issues and time zone headaches. - Casting from replays minimizes bnet connection lags and casting interruptions. - Minimizes editing work necessary and focuses on value-add production work. - Very smart, very professional overall.
Negatives: - solo casting has its limits, even with great casters like Wheat and TB. - lower than (my) expected viewer count. TSL has 50k+ viewers. I feel that it hasn't reached out to those outside of the SC2 communities yet.
Is it true that the IPL will stay NA only? In the section about future seasons on the site it says something about regional restrictions and eligibility... could this be alluding to EU/KR players not being able to apply? I hope not.
A superb international lineup is basically the only thing keeping the IPL from being one of the big dogs (since the prize pool is getting a bump and they're getting rid of the solo casting :p)
On April 22 2011 23:45 Strauss wrote: Incontrol hyped NASL for like six months and it was smashed by a tournament nobody even heard of 2 months ago GG, fatty
On April 22 2011 23:58 Escape wrote: I am very impressed so far. Good job IPL.
Positives: - Learned from others' mistakes - Limited to NA only, minimizes lag issues and time zone headaches. - Casting from replays minimizes bnet connection lags and casting interruptions. - Minimizes editing work necessary and focuses on value-add production work. - Very smart, very professional overall.
Negatives: - solo casting has its limits, even with great casters like Wheat and TB. - lower than (my) expected viewer count. TSL has 50k+ viewers. I feel that it hasn't reached out to those outside of the SC2 communities yet.
thanks again.
TSL is also broadcasted on weekends and has global players which helps a lot as not only are there players that the Korean scene might want to watch, but they can also stay up late/wake up early to watch it. The TSL also has no real conflicts unlike NASL/IPL which conflicts directly with stuff like Day[9] and SotG and indirectly with GSL (how many people can really watch IPL/NASL AND stay up for GSL)
On April 22 2011 23:45 Strauss wrote: Incontrol hyped NASL for like six months and it was smashed by a tournament nobody even heard of 2 months ago GG, fatty
This just fucking pisses me off so much. What have you done? Nothing.
Well, being rude aside, he does have a point. There are so many things wrong with NASL (and you cant expect everything to be perfect). But I (just me) think that they could have made it alot better. I like their approach of players must have a team and so on but I dont understand why they call it NASL and allow other players to play. The fact that so many koreans are lagging in game just reduces the level of play. I think they couldv really made it the foundation of sc2 esport if they would had limited it to players residing in NA. Hopefully it would be a hit and they could do the same thing in europe/asia/SA/SEA and then have top seeds (# ranging from server to another) would be invited to the "real GSL." (maybe have the global one change places from year to year and have the people who will organize the tournament pay for the lodging/food/airport to lan of the players from the profits of tickets and etc.)
I am not sure what the goal of this new tournament is, but its really fun to watch even with ok commentary. I hate Day9 but I think he is the only good commentator out there and if I had to choose what tournament I would watch it would be solely dependent on the commentator.
The IPL is amazing. I bet this is how it feels to be in Korea watching the GSL since they get free HD streaming. Hopefully the IPL can expand their player pool to more international players from Korea, SEA, Europe, and South america. In addition, I don't have a problem with the solo casters as they are really exciting and engaging. The games weren't the best but they made them seem great and they really didn't miss a thing. I do wonder if IPL has a dedicated observer for matches because the camera movement seemed a bit choppy, but I just might be spoiled by the camera work in the GSL lol.
On April 22 2011 12:07 Highways wrote: I completely agree, unbelievable production values.
IPL and NASL need to merge because the NASL production is sooo terrible.
How can NASL improve the IPL?
good players good casters good matches?
players granted, but the rest is to debate. I really hope NASL did watch with pen and paper in hand what IGN delivered today and start going to improve their stuff. There needs to be competition, and right now IPL just walks over NASL.
but all of NASL's problems are technical all of IPL's are fundamental.
more then one caster? gretorp getting better every night inc is a legit player thats actually playing well in the league. Diggity coming in and doing well. and kalador who is a very very good. TB is a horrid caster that got on my nerves in a single game.
Yesterday I watched 3 games of Sheth vs rainbow godlike 40+ games in each one. They where better then anything that IPL had today. poorly done 4 gate rush after poorly done 4 gate rush does not a good stream make.
and if tomarrow somehow they fix the stream and it isn't total shit whos a lot better? hell even MLG's going to have a great stream next event.
the gloss is going to come off the IPL and people are gona start seeing that. It looks fucking amazing but that can only go so far
You have never produced anything broadcast wise in your life have you?
There are no fundamental problems with the IPL, regardless of your opinion.
They will add international players next season, but idiots like you blame the league for the standard of matches after one night, ROFL
The reason that the games are of a high standard are because there are Europeans and Koreans in the NASL, what the IPL does very well is show that there aren't many great NA players which us Europeans have known for a while, the TSL also shows this. Doesn't mean that there wont be in the future.
Then to 'add' to your argument you actually state that if somehow they fix the stream and it isn't total shit..........who's a lot better? If they fix the stream, the sound, the encoding, the VOD access, the studio set-up, etc, etc. Every day the NASL has been saying bear with us guys we'll get there. But they haven't improved any of the technical aspects yet and yes the casting is improving very slowly. Every night there is another problem for the NASL, but your point about the quality of games is like blaming the NASL for the cancellations, which I certainly don't. Also to further illustrate how silly your point is Sheth played on both streams last night and he wasn't playing as well in his IPL game.
Lastly, look at Cruchers poorly executed 4 gate rush in his match against Incontrol, again you're being subjective
The gloss has already come off of the NASL because of the over-hype and the fact that it hasn't improved one bit since the show-match.
I watched both last night and overlooked the bad sound, bad quality stream because of the quality of players, i.e White-Ra vs Sjow on NASL.
The fundamentals are all in favour of the IPL so far. It is run by a large well funded, experienced company. They will add everything they need once they have proven the market for the product and confirmed the potential as they have stated.
To help put your bias in perspective ask yourself this, if it was say for example's sake a choice between watching the TSL or the NASL at this point and you had to pay for VOD's from the NASL (so its live stream versus live stream) which would you choose? I reckon 90% of TL people would answer TSL. The fact that they have 50000 viewers backs my point up.
IPL will add everything that the NASL has and will already be running their second (international) tournament before the first season of the NASL has concluded
I understand that you are supporting the NASL as are all true SC2 esports fans, but don't state subjective crap as the reason that their competitors will fail, I want them both to succeed and to spur each other on to be as good as they can be and the fact that we're being spoilt for choice makes your points sound very subjective. No personal disrespect intended here but I had to respond to that post.
I don't really see why it has to be one or the other. NASL can learn from IPL, IPL can learn from NASL. Competition is always a good thing regardless of medium and there's also plenty of room for different approaches. Nobody wants to see the NASL fail and claiming that IPL killed it is fairly ridiculous. It's a 3-4 day tournament to test the waters, after which Season 2 will be coming along with qualifiers, a larger playerpool, dual-commentators, more shinies, possibly an elephant and we'll see where it goes from there. In the meantime, NASL will continue to run with some amazing games and an incredible line-up.
I don't see how making comical player sketches makes it anymore better. I find that it actually takes away from the whole super-highly-advanced-futuristic theme of the game.
Free vods though... that's cash. I like me some of that for free.
On April 23 2011 00:48 TotalBiscuit wrote: I don't really see why it has to be one or the other. NASL can learn from IPL, IPL can learn from NASL. Competition is always a good thing regardless of medium and there's also plenty of room for different approaches. Nobody wants to see the NASL fail and claiming that IPL killed it is fairly ridiculous. It's a 3-4 day tournament to test the waters, after which Season 2 will be coming along with qualifiers, a larger playerpool, dual-commentators, more shinies, possibly an elephant and we'll see where it goes from there. In the meantime, NASL will continue to run with some amazing games and an incredible line-up.
Competition is awesome, but trash talk is unfortunately one of the side effects.
On April 23 2011 00:48 TotalBiscuit wrote: I don't really see why it has to be one or the other. NASL can learn from IPL, IPL can learn from NASL. Competition is always a good thing regardless of medium and there's also plenty of room for different approaches. Nobody wants to see the NASL fail and claiming that IPL killed it is fairly ridiculous. It's a 3-4 day tournament to test the waters, after which Season 2 will be coming along with qualifiers, a larger playerpool, dual-commentators, more shinies, possibly an elephant and we'll see where it goes from there. In the meantime, NASL will continue to run with some amazing games and an incredible line-up.
Sadly, such is the internet. But I totally agree with you.
On April 23 2011 00:48 TotalBiscuit wrote: I don't really see why it has to be one or the other. NASL can learn from IPL, IPL can learn from NASL. Competition is always a good thing regardless of medium and there's also plenty of room for different approaches. Nobody wants to see the NASL fail and claiming that IPL killed it is fairly ridiculous. It's a 3-4 day tournament to test the waters, after which Season 2 will be coming along with qualifiers, a larger playerpool, dual-commentators, more shinies, possibly an elephant and we'll see where it goes from there. In the meantime, NASL will continue to run with some amazing games and an incredible line-up.
I'm going to hold you to that elephant in season 2!
Amazing production but I'd like dual casters as its usually nice to have two people talking things out with each other and making jokes with each other and etc in the dull times.
On April 23 2011 00:48 TotalBiscuit wrote: I don't really see why it has to be one or the other. NASL can learn from IPL, IPL can learn from NASL. Competition is always a good thing regardless of medium and there's also plenty of room for different approaches. Nobody wants to see the NASL fail and claiming that IPL killed it is fairly ridiculous. It's a 3-4 day tournament to test the waters, after which Season 2 will be coming along with qualifiers, a larger playerpool, dual-commentators, more shinies, possibly an elephant and we'll see where it goes from there. In the meantime, NASL will continue to run with some amazing games and an incredible line-up.
If it will not be able to do tricks I can assure you, you will have a public outcry to rival that of Kelly casting Code A :D
Total Biscuit is completely right. Competition will do nothing but good things for E-sports. I'm sure players like having more tournaments too, gives them opportunities to make more money and display their skills. Having these two leagues running parallel will be awesome for SC2 and will ideally bring more legitimacy to the sport itself.
Holy wow. This is awesome-sauce. VODs nice and split up and easy to find. but my only qualm is that there is no non-spoiler 3rd match added to the VOD set up. As soon as you open you know if there is a third match or not. I am sure they will change this going forward. Prod quality is way slicker than i could have imagined.
I like having a british caster, sounds so classy! but for some reason he reminds me of the old school micro-machines guy, who talked super fast. yeah, i know. i'm a geezer.
I must be viewing vods at a different place than you guys above, because i only see ONE vid option for each matchup, and then it will autoplay the full playlist of the series when you play that vod..
Follow-up to "clicking off the screen" cancelling the current vod progress: I switched from Chrome to Firefox, and this problem does not seem to occur. Also: standard def vods were choppy with Chrome (even though load bar was far ahead of progress bar), but with Firefox are smooth.
IPL: Work on vod setups, do not spoil but allow for full choice of games. Also work on browser compatibility issues.
Just one minor issue with the "score overlay" ... it says "Round 1", but at the same time DJWheat talks about "the round of 16" and having the same term used for two different things seems kinda bad. The games are "properly numbered" as game 1, 2, 3 in the VOD section and thus the overlay should be Game instead of Round ... One minor issue that is easily fixed.
I was wondering, why can't we like both? Some people on here are trying to make us, make a decision on who is the best and citing reasons. I love all the games, all the players, so much content. If the people who love IPL, awesome sauce, if you love NASL awesome sauce as well.
Do we have to choose? I'm enjoying all these games. Its very nice we are able to express our opinion, but why compare. If you didn't pay for NASL, great for you. If you did (I'm paying and not regretting it one bit) then I'm sorry if you are unhappy.
What I don't understand if people complaining about the production value. When the world cup is going on, I was just happy to hear it on any kind of media device. If my favorite team was playing on American football I am happy to at least read about it on some forum. Its the game people, the excitement of the players.
Complaining about the score overlay, or it lagged seriously? Its all wonderful. Don't you think?
Maybe this industry is being too transparent? Making changes to suit a few, when the content is so enjoyable.
I don't have a clue on how to encode or make the audio better. I know how to enjoy and feel the blood rush as pro gamers clash in this arena for our enjoyment.
It will never be perfect to please everyone. There will always be something wrong in few peoples eyes. My worry is we are driving a wedge between all these people we have grown to love. People are now choosing sides ( its in the air) DJwheat or Gretorp?
TB or Incontrol? wow seriously, is this the way we want it to go down? ( and no i was just making examples not choosing sides)
I'm happy for all the people involved. Their time and dedication has hopefully paid off for the benefit of themselves ad well as for our benefit.
I saw the moderators on both streams having a field day by banning people left and right.
Am I doing something wrong? I checked out a vod this morning and the quality was hardly 1080p. My NASL vods look just as good if not better (Not talking about fps here...no clue as to how each are encoded, etc). Is the 1080p quality the op is talking about only for the stream or something? Not trying to knock it or anything, just a little confused.
On April 23 2011 00:48 TotalBiscuit wrote: I don't really see why it has to be one or the other. NASL can learn from IPL, IPL can learn from NASL. Competition is always a good thing regardless of medium and there's also plenty of room for different approaches. Nobody wants to see the NASL fail and claiming that IPL killed it is fairly ridiculous. It's a 3-4 day tournament to test the waters, after which Season 2 will be coming along with qualifiers, a larger playerpool, dual-commentators, more shinies, possibly an elephant and we'll see where it goes from there. In the meantime, NASL will continue to run with some amazing games and an incredible line-up.
I'm going to hold you to that elephant in season 2!
You have to swap it to HD settings, and i think the TC was exaggerating a bit. The quality is phenomenal for a free stream and significantly better that was NASL's stream
IPL stream / audio quality is amazing.. so are the casters... But i rather watch incontrol and gretorp <3 ... Nothing against IPL im just an nasl fan...
Remember.. if you dont give a shit what league you watch... watch nasl
On April 23 2011 02:55 Justanx wrote: Do we have to choose?
I don't want to choose, but there is only so much time in the day to work, play starcraft, watch starcraft, work some more, try and sleep and do it all over again (also trying to fit in Bulls playoff games). therefore, it inevitably comes down to making a choice here and there. I think many of us will ultimately choose GSL first, because we have come to love it and it has been refined into the best pro SC2 around. Plus its live, who doesn't love live action. After GSL i think most of us will have time for one more major league, like either NASL or IPL.
I won't be choosing so much as focusing my attention on one. Like, for NASL its the amazing amount of games that i love, so i will probably keep an eye out for the match-ups and players i really want to see, while watching the IPL more religiously like i do GSL.
It amazes me that people complain about the pre-game show that the NASL does. Your not forced to watch it and its not like you don't know when the games start anyway. If its such a big deal just skip it. People who really enjoy hearing stuff about SCII regardless of what it is enjoy the pre-game show and appreciate that the NASL does it. You don't have to buy a pass to the NASL so wth.
I didn't get to watch all of the IGN PL last night but from the start it was good, ran smooth, looked great, and sounded good to. Thought the casters did a great job to. All I know is I've got great leagues to watch and they will only continue to improve.
On April 23 2011 02:55 Justanx wrote: I was wondering, why can't we like both? Some people on here are trying to make us, make a decision on who is the best and citing reasons. I love all the games, all the players, so much content. If the people who love IPL, awesome sauce, if you love NASL awesome sauce as well.
Do we have to choose? I'm enjoying all these games. Its very nice we are able to express our opinion, but why compare. If you didn't pay for NASL, great for you. If you did (I'm paying and not regretting it one bit) then I'm sorry if you are unhappy.
What I don't understand if people complaining about the production value. When the world cup is going on, I was just happy to hear it on any kind of media device. If my favorite team was playing on American football I am happy to at least read about it on some forum. Its the game people, the excitement of the players.
Complaining about the score overlay, or it lagged seriously? Its all wonderful. Don't you think?
Maybe this industry is being too transparent? Making changes to suit a few, when the content is so enjoyable.
I don't have a clue on how to encode or make the audio better. I know how to enjoy and feel the blood rush as pro gamers clash in this arena for our enjoyment.
It will never be perfect to please everyone. There will always be something wrong in few peoples eyes. My worry is we are driving a wedge between all these people we have grown to love. People are now choosing sides ( its in the air) DJwheat or Gretorp?
TB or Incontrol? wow seriously, is this the way we want it to go down? ( and no i was just making examples not choosing sides)
I'm happy for all the people involved. Their time and dedication has hopefully paid off for the benefit of themselves ad well as for our benefit.
I saw the moderators on both streams having a field day by banning people left and right.
Maybe they should just turn off the chat.
Please, lets us enjoy.
Very nice post, and I agree 100%. I think a lot of the anti-NASL language put out there by the TL community can only hurt Esports. Patience is what is sorely missing.
Hey everyone, we really appreciate all of your input and feedback. Right now our engineers are working on our video section to make it better! Please keep giving us feedback as the video site evolves and the event progresses! I've read every single post here and have passed on a lot of great stuff!
On April 23 2011 07:54 Alex.IGN wrote: Hey everyone, we really appreciate all of your input and feedback. Right now our engineers are working on our video section to make it better! Please keep giving us feedback as the video site evolves and the event progresses! I've read every single post here and have passed on a lot of great stuff!
I really loved how it went yesterday NASL cannot compete with you guys. Better casting, better production and it's free!!! I can't complain.
I know it's only been one cast, but they simply have got it right. Through a combination of having spectacular production value and learning from others mistakes, IGN is definitely teh sex :D
I feel sorry for NASL. More hype but they only have like 10 people working on NASL while IGN has probably a whole team. And it shows too. What irks me is that NASL is not professional (no professionals working there) but they marketed themselves as being a pro league.
On April 23 2011 02:55 Justanx wrote: I was wondering, why can't we like both? Some people on here are trying to make us, make a decision on who is the best and citing reasons. I love all the games, all the players, so much content. If the people who love IPL, awesome sauce, if you love NASL awesome sauce as well.
Do we have to choose? I'm enjoying all these games. Its very nice we are able to express our opinion, but why compare. If you didn't pay for NASL, great for you. If you did (I'm paying and not regretting it one bit) then I'm sorry if you are unhappy.
What I don't understand if people complaining about the production value. When the world cup is going on, I was just happy to hear it on any kind of media device. If my favorite team was playing on American football I am happy to at least read about it on some forum. Its the game people, the excitement of the players.
Complaining about the score overlay, or it lagged seriously? Its all wonderful. Don't you think?
Maybe this industry is being too transparent? Making changes to suit a few, when the content is so enjoyable.
I don't have a clue on how to encode or make the audio better. I know how to enjoy and feel the blood rush as pro gamers clash in this arena for our enjoyment.
It will never be perfect to please everyone. There will always be something wrong in few peoples eyes. My worry is we are driving a wedge between all these people we have grown to love. People are now choosing sides ( its in the air) DJwheat or Gretorp?
TB or Incontrol? wow seriously, is this the way we want it to go down? ( and no i was just making examples not choosing sides)
I'm happy for all the people involved. Their time and dedication has hopefully paid off for the benefit of themselves ad well as for our benefit.
I saw the moderators on both streams having a field day by banning people left and right.
Maybe they should just turn off the chat.
Please, lets us enjoy.
Very nice post, and I agree 100%. I think a lot of the anti-NASL language put out there by the TL community can only hurt Esports. Patience is what is sorely missing.
Right on. The thing is, this is the first time that anything of this caliber has been brought to western-esports (aside from TSL1 and TSL2). The GSL has had a huge amount of time in watching sc1 management in South Korea and has done a great job in re-inventing that format. This is the first time that something like this is being brought to the western e-sports and frankly, we've been spoiled by the awesomeness of GSL, OSL, MSL. We need to wait and be patient, provide constructive criticism and eventually we can have e-sports blossom around the world.
On April 23 2011 00:44 Augury wrote: They even have free VoDs, definitely something to be excited about. Not to mention Wheat is easily the best eSports caster out there.
I think Day9 and Husky make a great combo aswell. If I had to watch a game casted by a single caster, I'd pick Khaldor in German, even though I don't understand the German language, he knows how to get the spectator excited.
EDIT: I was just checking this thread and I checked the IPL vods just now, and oh my god man that is amazing production. I loved the comic-book style artwork and flashy "BAM BAM" score screen after games.
About NASL vs IPL, I think IPL at the moment is definitely way better than NASL in some aspects, but remember what Incontrol said, they don't have a studio full of people working on it, I'm sure when NASL gets more support on production I think it'll be as good as IPL right now.
On April 23 2011 00:44 Augury wrote: They even have free VoDs, definitely something to be excited about. Not to mention Wheat is easily the best eSports caster out there.
I think Day9 and Husky make a great combo aswell. If I had to watch a game casted by a single caster, I'd pick Khaldor in German, even though I don't understand the German language, he knows how to get the spectator excited.
Enthusiasm transcends language. That and Khaldor is a handsome devil.
I don't understand how people can even compare NASL vs IPL...
- 50 players vs 16 players - 3 months to finish the league vs a few weeks... - players from all over world vs players only from NA
Its not even really similar...
NASL is more like a sports league, with regular and play off seasons IPL is more like a national competition, its fast and furious with only the best players from a region.
- - - -
Sure if people have little to no time to watch SC2, then ya you have to choose, but then you will have to choose between these leagues and MLG/Dreamhack/TSL, ETC...
To me its not really a competition, its just similar things that people can watch both if they want, but they offer different content.
I really think it's unfair to make comparisons between IPL and NASL given the disparity in resources between the two.
Regardless, competition can only drive both groups on to bigger and better things and their mere existence is incredibly exciting for eSports as a whole.
i found many of IPL's games boring, granted there isn't much they could do and there WERE interesting games (ex. CatZ bossing on tal dar'im)
To be honest i prefer NASL because i personally love gretorp and incontrol's casting and find the level of play to be higher, seeing as it's a global league
This is soooo good :O I don't want to be mean but i think this can be the end of the NASL if he don't upgrade his stream. IPL is just perfect. No lagg, FREE !!! and good and the production look really professional
On April 23 2011 00:44 Augury wrote: They even have free VoDs, definitely something to be excited about. Not to mention Wheat is easily the best eSports caster out there.
I think Day9 and Husky make a great combo aswell. If I had to watch a game casted by a single caster, I'd pick Khaldor in German, even though I don't understand the German language, he knows how to get the spectator excited.
Enthusiasm transcends language. That and Khaldor is a handsome devil.
Khaldor is probably the closest caster to you in terms of style. His English casting really good, but his German is superb. I remember tuning into the Assembly and just opened one of the streams (others were down or just not streaming matches) and I just wondered "Who the hell is this guy? He really made that game fun!" This was the same effect I've felt about the TRH video and you for the first time. Khaldor has this moments where he talks like a stimmed marine which really make me excited.
What I don't like about solo-casting:
There are periods of time where casting gets boring, because usually casters pick one of the two styles and go for it (analysis, or make-it-fun) and in solo-casting that kind of becomes too noticable which I don't like. Also, when solo-casting, there is noone to fill in the "blanks", the periods when a caster doesn't really know how to continue (especially on macro games, there's not much to talk about, an analysis type caster fills in those blanks)
I feel like Day9 is sort of a mix of both, due to his great knowledge of Starcraft for more than a decade, and also because of his daily show, he knows how to really make something funny/interesting. He also makes some hard to catch jokes (for example a marine survived in one of Boxer vs. Sen games, and Day9 said "That marine chose the Sole Survivor background in Mass Effect") If you played the game, that cracks you up man :D
Seriously, is the SC2 community so juvenile it has to always engage in 'my tournament is better?' syndrome. NASL is flawed, but very ambitious. IGN is polished but very simplistic. Nothing wrong with either approach, both have things they can improve.
The important thing is they are supporting the game we all love. All other Esports would fight and die to have either one of them, and we get both + GSL. We should just feel lucky.
The casters are off time with the replay and the game sound is very loud. The casters are ahead of whats happening so its ruining watching the stream =/
On April 22 2011 10:12 Zerker wrote: - Custom artwork for the players, Almost resembles street fighter!
Yes, this is such a nice touch. It really makes everything look professional and well-produced. This kind of production is what will make Starcraft 2 casting appeal to the masses with less gaming experience.
The IGN ProLeague has *really* impressed me. Their open format will allow the great up-and-coming players to have a shot in a major tournament as well.
What I like is there overlays arent all in the way. There twitter and everything is small and tucked away but you can see it. Best of all I dont have to pay 25,000 for HD
On April 23 2011 10:17 Oreo7 wrote: Soooo good. I kind of feel bad for NASL, but the IPL is seriously awesome.
Totally agree, but the NASL will fix their problems and hopefully at some point it will just become a matter of picking which games you want to watch as opposed to picking based on stream quality etc.
On April 23 2011 10:24 Chanted wrote: I dont understand how I can watch flawless IGN/IPL stream on best quality on Justintv, and even 240 lags on NASL stream, seems really weird
On April 23 2011 10:24 Chanted wrote: I dont understand how I can watch flawless IGN/IPL stream on best quality on Justintv, and even 240 lags on NASL stream, seems really weird
I'm diggin the games and the stream quality.... But for the love of all that is good and holy can that commentator get a partner??? One person commentating is really really boring. And some background music would be nice.
the production and stream is great! My only knock is the lack of a casting duo, it's kinda weird hearing only 1 guy cast at a time. Also, the league needs more players.
I think the biggest downfall of having just 1 caster is when 2 battles are happening on the map at once. With 2 casters you can have one caster talking about the one you see on the screen while the other is watching the other small drops to keep the viewer up to date on whats going on. LIke the game vs idra and drewbie not knowing how much dmg the 2 hellions that ran up the ramp did.
The production quality is quite amazing, Kudos to the WellPlayed.org team, you guys have some TALENTED artists and media people. I've been following eSports for 11 years and this is one of the best productions ive seen.
gotta just add in and say im enjoying this IPL cast. it looks amazing and its just a little different in all the right ways. very clean, loving it so far.
This is the best modded chat I ever seen. If you can't come in civilized then you are gonna get the timeout. If something emotional happens you can rage or get excited. Just don't be disrespectful and your good to go. FINALLY!!! Keep up the good work.
On April 22 2011 23:45 Strauss wrote: Incontrol hyped NASL for like six months and it was smashed by a tournament nobody even heard of 2 months ago GG, fatty
This just fucking pisses me off so much. What have you done? Nothing.
On April 22 2011 10:12 Zerker wrote: This thread is dedicated to how good IGN pro league stream is. If you have anything to say, negative or positive post it here!
What i noticed at first - Quality is 1080p, Seriuosly it looks like your watching a dvd! - Audio is amazing, Its crisp, sharp, response is good. - Custom artwork for the players, Almost resembles street fighter! - Professional casters that have a lot of experience in the casting field? YES PLEASE.
Leave a comment of your own, why you think this stream / league is amazing or if your disappointed :D
100% Agree, other tournaments could learn from the IPL.
On April 22 2011 10:20 sermokala wrote: all the games have been shitty so far and I don't like the sole comentator but still great production.
This is my exact thoughts on it. No reason not to support it, but I am just not entertained by the games so far. Have I missed player interviews on stream? I have not seen any. I really like that from dreamhack/nasl. Other than that I have no notes for the league.
Wow, i think theres no denying it, the IPL is by far the highest quality league/tournament outside of korea right now in terms of production, this is just outstanding. Like a lot of other posts have said i think the only problem is that the is no dual casting of the games, but still top notch casting none the less.
I really like the animations, the artworks, the qualitiy and the low waiting time between the games. Really one of the best online tournaments this far!
So much time on the NASL screen dedicated to talking about the games before and after, IGN at the moment goes directly into the next game. I would prefer watching the games within a set one after another with little talk time about the previous game or a long analysis of the upcoming game (which happens way to often).
Despite wanting to see NASL players about 90x more than some of the IGN PL ones I ended up watching the PL.
-Fantastic video quality -Game, game, game. Love the pacing, even beats the TSL in that regard. -The production is the best I've seen -No hassle switching casters, always feels natural. -After game stats is a brilliant touch.
Shit, I never thought IGN could actually create anything worth watching. Instead they go ahead and make the best Western SC2 tournament production wise, can't wait for the real thing. This is how online tournaments should be run (pacing wise, obviously can't ask for this kind of production from anyone).
Though no tournament is perfect.
-Would like to have some caster who really knows the game. Artosis style in other words. More than covered on enthusiasm as it is (which is not a bad thing of course). err
I wonder, from a business model standpoint, if these big leagues would have a better time signing individual players to contracts. It seems that in the SC2 scene, the players are the true commodities and their play is what draws viewers. Obviously, this model is not great for the fan but I think it would be best for leagues and players.
On April 23 2011 11:19 slyboogie wrote: I wonder, from a business model standpoint, if these big leagues would have a better time signing individual players to contracts. It seems that in the SC2 scene, the players are the true commodities and their play is what draws viewers. Obviously, this model is not great for the fan but I think it would be best for leagues and players.
it would work well in Team play, but i don't think it's beneficial for the players or the fans to restrict players to 1 league for individual tournaments.
When they were hyping the NASL, I thought it was going to be more like what the IPL is doing. The in between match graphics and the post game stats are really nice. Everything is pretty much perfect and they will obviously get better at it as they do more leagues.
Nada playing in NASL for christ sake and IPN has double the stream viewers. Shows you what good quality can bring. NASL still has nuclear silo sound and mouse clicking..
On April 23 2011 11:53 crms wrote: Nada playing in NASL for christ sake and IPN has double the stream viewers. Shows you what good quality can bring. NASL still has nuclear silo sound and mouse clicking..
All the production in the world can't make up for the excellent game that was just played in the NASL.
On April 23 2011 11:53 crms wrote: Nada playing in NASL for christ sake and IPN has double the stream viewers. Shows you what good quality can bring. NASL still has nuclear silo sound and mouse clicking..
All the production in the world can't make up for the excellent game that was just played in the NASL.
true that was an incredible comeback. However considering most, all but like 2-3? of the IPL players are in NASL the chance for amazing games is pretty much the same... Amazing games happen by chance when the best players in the world are playing against each other, both leagues have this chance. There is no excuse for the sound quality to still be this bad on NASL.
On April 23 2011 11:53 crms wrote: Nada playing in NASL for christ sake and IPN has double the stream viewers. Shows you what good quality can bring. NASL still has nuclear silo sound and mouse clicking..
All the production in the world can't make up for the excellent game that was just played in the NASL.
i hope nobody is arguing that one tournament inherently can't have as good of games as the other ...
On April 23 2011 11:53 crms wrote: Nada playing in NASL for christ sake and IPN has double the stream viewers. Shows you what good quality can bring. NASL still has nuclear silo sound and mouse clicking..
I just realised Im hearing keyboard chatter... what the funk.
I see HD is casting IPL. Cool for him! Have to watch nada vs moonglade first though.
I like the IPL, too, but before you try to compare it to the NASL, please understand:
-There is no studio production, and the commentators are presumably recording from their own in-home setups.
-It's the post-production that is impressive. They aren't filming anyone live, so the only production aspect is recording the games and the audio from the casters.
-As I understand, the games were played further in advance than the NASL games are played, so the editors had more time to put everything together.
I'm not saying IPL is bad; I enjoy it quite a bit. But don't say "This is what NASL should do." NASL is trying a more elaborate production, and they are trying to do it more quickly. It's probably a mistake to compare them at all.
On April 23 2011 11:53 crms wrote: Nada playing in NASL for christ sake and IPN has double the stream viewers. Shows you what good quality can bring. NASL still has nuclear silo sound and mouse clicking..
All the production in the world can't make up for the excellent game that was just played in the NASL.
until the players see the numbers. Next season has more players. So better matches coming. Its alot easier to get better players then it is to fix major issues with ur league.
but i will say i love djwheat been listening to him for a while, but he really needs a co caster like painuser or cats or someone more knowledgeable and his casts will be so elevated imo.
On April 23 2011 12:06 Scarmath wrote: I like the IPL, too, but before you try to compare it to the NASL, please understand:
-There is no studio production, and the commentators are presumably recording from their own in-home setups.
-It's the post-production that is impressive. They aren't filming anyone live, so the only production aspect is recording the games and the audio from the casters.
-As I understand, the games were played further in advance than the NASL games are played, so the editors had more time to put everything together.
I'm not saying IPL is bad; I enjoy it quite a bit. But don't say "This is what NASL should do." NASL is trying a more elaborate production, and they are trying to do it more quickly. It's probably a mistake to compare them at all.
Nobody really needs to "understand". I had a good time watching the IPL and laughed a lot. NASL I just watch to see if my favorite player wins. Flooding the scene with content that people don't enjoy isn't going to make esports grow and could potentially scare off investors.
I wish people would ease up on the nasl hate. They're trying their best and have brought great and entertaining games and they are only going to get better.v
An absolutely entertaining night of IPL... Great casting by Painuser and HD... Smooth transitions, great audio, fun games
Just tuned in to NASL... And got InControl clicking and typing on keyboard, and background SC2 music that tries to make up for the poor Gretorp casting...
IPL has been amazing so far. No stream lag however the stream has frozen twice for me, but either fixed itself in 5-10 seconds or I refreshed to fix. The games by the players and the casting have also been excellent hoping for more IPLs in the future.
Its incredible how it just seems like everyone screws up on the first try and we always ''excuse'' them by saying that its the first try so we should give them a shot.
IPL has managed to finally break that and gave us amazing production value on the first time.
At first i was duel-watching but after going back and forth between the streams and seeing them side by side-The comparison was a joke.
IPL was everything NASL failed to be so far (here is hoping for improvement from InControl and crew)
1080 crisp and clear video and sound-check Great production value-check, great casting-check, top players-check, professionally done interviews with the token high-maintenance female? check...
i am in awe and did not expect any of that, everything they're doing - they're doing it right.
although: djWheat? cmonnnnnn, the solo casting doesnt bother me THAT much but dj wheat is not fit for solo casting, i dont think he really knows enough about the game...
I dont like the pajamas broadcaster he made several mistakes in the game I watched and sounded like he was trying to be more excited then he was. I imagine its not easy casting but that is my honest review. The other casters are all excellent as is the quality of the stream.
although: djWheat? cmonnnnnn, the solo casting doesnt bother me THAT much but dj wheat is not fit for solo casting, i dont think he really knows enough about the game...
Every other game/tourney ive seen him cast its been with a co caster because hes more of a colour commentator. I mean he is plat so he has some knowledge but not nearly enough for alot of the viewers.
It's kind of hard to watch this league. Sure, the production value is nice, but we don't get any insight and it's not as community driven as the NASL. It feels like SC is being marketed to some other demographic via IPL, and it's a bit weird. I'll be prioritizing my NASL viewing over IPL for now until they get a steady analytical commentator who really knows his Starcraft, besides PainUser.
all the players in it are nowhere close to korean players. i have zero interest for every player cept for maybe idra in the IPL. why watch this when you can watch the GSL? much more entertaining games and skill in GSL
On April 23 2011 13:07 SpecFire wrote: all the players in it are nowhere close to korean players. i have zero interest for every player cept for maybe idra in the IPL. why watch this when you can watch the GSL? much more entertaining games and skill in GSL
On April 23 2011 13:07 SpecFire wrote: all the players in it are nowhere close to korean players. i have zero interest for every player cept for maybe idra in the IPL. why watch this when you can watch the GSL? much more entertaining games and skill in GSL
No one's comparing IPL to GSL. Everyone knows the GSL is the best tourney out there.
IPL has certainly been very impressively executed. The entertainment value, stream quality is excellent. I feel like there wasn't very much transparency with the community on how IPL would select players/etc. However, that aside, its a great thing to watch.
i really love the ipl. its production value, casting and pacing is great. i like the nasl aswell, but atm the ipl is just more enjoyable to me. but i agree with some others, while the ipl is doing many things very well, they could include some more "insiderness" to the sc2 community. if there is a criticism right now, it imho would be that the ipl show is too clean and straightforward. i love that it doesnt have a silly 30 min preshow, i love that the games are being broadcast in quick succession, but at some few times, they should imho take some few (!) more minutes between the games to analyse the previous series or to give some interesting background info about the players and the scene.
again: plz dont overdo this type of stuff, i like that the ipl is focusing on the games, but sometimesslightly more background info about the scene would make it even more enjoyable in my eyes.
but all in all, i gotta say thanks and keep up the good work! ^_^
It's sad that so many people have to compare the IPL with the NASL. I wish more people could just say, sweet another tournament with X Y Z great things.
Either way I enjoy this and as a double elimination tourny goes I'm not too interested with the player selection. Production value is superb though and looking forward to Season 2,3,4....
I have to say that while the production value is good, I cannot see single casting with DJ Wheat, catspajamas or totalbiscuit to be superior to the NASL.
again: plz dont overdo this type of stuff, i like that the ipl is focusing on the games, but sometimesslightly more background info about the scene would make it even more enjoyable in my eyes.
not to mention we can use those times as pee and food breaks :S
For me it's going to come down to the players actually playing on that day. For example, tomorrow's IPL lineup/players aren't my favourite, so I'm going to watch MC and Select play tomorrow in the NASL. I'm going to give the NASL $25 just because I can, no I'm not going to watch all the VOD's, I might even watch IPL more than NASL, but the only way for e-sports to grow is for the community contribute. It can't always be free TSL, free IPL, free showmatches forever.
On April 23 2011 13:19 Ruyguy wrote: For me it's going to come down to the players actually playing on that day. For example, tomorrow's IPL lineup/players aren't my favourite, so I'm going to watch MC and Select play tomorrow in the NASL. I'm going to give the NASL $25 just because I can, no I'm not going to watch all the VOD's, I might even watch IPL more than NASL, but the only way for e-sports to grow is for the community contribute. It can't always be free TSL, free IPL, free showmatches forever.
1. Get tons of viewers for free events 2. Show sponsors advertising opportunity 3. ??? 4. Free event forever and make money for org running it
On April 23 2011 13:17 radiumz0rz wrote: I have to say that while the production value is good, I cannot see single casting with DJ Wheat, catspajamas or totalbiscuit to be superior to the NASL.
I would completely agree. It's almost like watching a youtube channel covering a double elim tournament.
I personally love production of the IGN league. I love the art work and the animations after each win, it adds a nice flare to it. I also find the Korean name introduction of each player to be hilarious. And the end game stats is something that I find interesting.
The only thing I don't like about it, is that it really does not hype the players. It gives very little back story to each person. I feel that is where the NASL is doing better then the IGN. but overall I was extremely pleased with the IGN production
P.S I prefer dual casters. DJ wheat and Total Biscuit can only be so entertaining solo for so long.
On April 23 2011 13:19 Ruyguy wrote: For me it's going to come down to the players actually playing on that day. For example, tomorrow's IPL lineup/players aren't my favourite, so I'm going to watch MC and Select play tomorrow in the NASL. I'm going to give the NASL $25 just because I can, no I'm not going to watch all the VOD's, I might even watch IPL more than NASL, but the only way for e-sports to grow is for the community contribute. It can't always be free TSL, free IPL, free showmatches forever.
yeah i mean no other organization is able to survive off of giving their viewer base free content....
Hmmm I have to agree, I love the casters and their ability in the field, but I think dual casting is the way to go in a tournament setting. Just group up some of the casters and it should be all good, shouldn't it be?
On April 23 2011 13:29 EchelonTee wrote: Hmmm I have to agree, I love the casters and their ability in the field, but I think dual casting is the way to go in a tournament setting. Just group up some of the casters and it should be all good, shouldn't it be?
Because it's casted from a replay, it introduces a synchronization problem.
Since this season is a "test run" I would assume that means you are trying out a variety of casters. For the more finished product I believe you should stick with a mix between painuser, HD, and DJ wheat. The other ones are hard on the ears and have little to no game knowledge.
I just clicked on Idra vs Drewbie link, and I got loaded the Idra vs Fenix game.
So there's some kind of mistake there.
Also, the way the stream works is making it impossible for me to watch the games. My net isn't good enough to watch live, and I can't download the VODs, nor I can let it loading because it'll only load a couple minutes and then stop. It needs a constant stream in order to load everything, and as I said, my net isn't good enough.
I know it's not their fault my net sux, but I'm just saying people with bad internet connection won't be able to watch the games. That's sad.
On April 23 2011 13:51 TheGreenBee wrote: HD is the worst caster in the mix in my opinion. He just doesn't know what's going on half of the time. The only thing he's good at is act excited.
You think hd is the least knowledgeable? What are you watching lol
On April 23 2011 13:24 T.BonePickens wrote: I personally love production of the IGN league. I love the art work and the animations after each win, it adds a nice flare to it. I also find the Korean name introduction of each player to be hilarious. And the end game stats is something that I find interesting.
The only thing I don't like about it, is that it really does not hype the players. It gives very little back story to each person. I feel that is where the NASL is doing better then the IGN. but overall I was extremely pleased with the IGN production
P.S I prefer dual casters. DJ wheat and Total Biscuit can only be so entertaining solo for so long.
Thanks for your comments! Did you get a chance to check out the in-depth interviews we had with players? You can find them on the videos page @ www.ign.com/ipl
Just my thoughts on the casters from a masters level perspective.
TB hypes the battles and I enjoy listening to him, I think he's the only caster that Im feel safe putting on speakers if my family is in the same or adjecent room. Sure he doesn't add too much insight, but he's fun, and well for someone like me... I can analyse the situation, and most of you should be able to two. I feel you guys don't care what game you're watching but rather how good the commentator is. If you watch hockey would you be lost without a commentator too? My advice is learn the game.
Djwheat - I really really dislike his solo casting. Very often he doesn't know what he's talking about but he's so confident with what he says. Maybe to the casual person it sounds right but when he's saying how someone is ahead, or how he needs to get this... When clearly the player is just stalling for broodlords is bleh. He can do play by play, but his analysis is really far from correct, and it just bugs me when someone is so confident about wrong things constantly - I think djwheat needs to play the game more or just cast with two people.
The Painuser with HD? was a good commentary. They did a solid job, I have no complaints. There's nothing that really stood out, but nothing that was bad , at all... Which alone mKes them better than 95% of the casters. I did like Painusers input even though he was keeping it pretty low level for the casual viewers, they didn't miss anything and I enjoyed the cast.
I haven't payed for the GSL or MLG, or even NASL... But if these guys start doing PPV at a reasonable price I will definitely buy because they offered quality, preparation, and just a smooth stream overall. Definitely hoping other tourneys take the same path as this one.... Especially NASL. Well done guys, surely you deserve more than the 12k viewers you had the last two days!
VODs of Day 2 are up! To find games from previous days, filter by games. This site is still very much a work in progress so the site will improve! Please continue to give us feedback as the site evolves! http://www.ign.com/ipl/videos
On April 23 2011 14:47 Alex.IGN wrote: VODs of Day 2 are up! To find games from previous days, filter by games. This site is still very much a work in progress so the site will improve! Please continue to give us feedback as the site evolves! http://www.ign.com/ipl/videos
Please, if you're not going to allow downloading the VODs, at least make it possible to load the whole video without having to actually be watching it, because for people with slow connection, you can't watch it directly, and if you leave it loading, it will only load a couple minutes and then stop.
I mean, make it able to press play, start loading, press pause, and then wait untill the whole video is loaded so I can watch without pauses.
On April 23 2011 14:47 Alex.IGN wrote: VODs of Day 2 are up! To find games from previous days, filter by games. This site is still very much a work in progress so the site will improve! Please continue to give us feedback as the site evolves! http://www.ign.com/ipl/videos
Please, if you're not going to allow downloading the VODs, at least make it possible to load the whole video without having to actually be watching it, because for people with slow connection, you can't watch it directly, and if you leave it loading, it will only load a couple minutes and then stop.
I mean, make it able to press play, start loading, press pause, and then wait untill the whole video is loaded so I can watch without pauses.
It doesn't do that for you? It loads for me just fine when I pause.
On April 23 2011 13:51 TheGreenBee wrote: HD is the worst caster in the mix in my opinion. He just doesn't know what's going on half of the time. The only thing he's good at is act excited.
Ur insane lol. HD is a masters level player, he just lets pain user take the role of analysis because that's how they go. He's a much better player than most commentators lol.
Casting has been pretty good, I had to cringe when TB saw a toss build 4 gates then a nexus, but never mentioned the possibility of the nexus cancel, and only saw it when the 4gate was about to attack.
On April 23 2011 14:38 Skillz_Man wrote: Just my thoughts on the casters from a masters level perspective.
TB hypes the battles and I enjoy listening to him, I think he's the only caster that Im feel safe putting on speakers if my family is in the same or adjecent room. Sure he doesn't add too much insight, but he's fun, and well for someone like me... I can analyse the situation, and most of you should be able to two. I feel you guys don't care what game you're watching but rather how good the commentator is. If you watch hockey would you be lost without a commentator too? My advice is learn the game.
hmm it seems your interpretation of the TB criticism is a bit off.. People don't really NEED to be explicitly explained every little nuance of the match...but a those little details should come naturally to a good commentator (why ex-pros make brilliant commentators) so they can highlight what is important thats going on in the game. TB stands out because he either highlights the wrong thing / and if he does get it right it feels really forced and not natural, so he falls back on his annoying antics and observational humor...But yea when people say they want a more knowledgeable caster, its not because people are lost with a bad commentator, a bad commentator is just really, really distracting from the game.
On April 23 2011 13:51 TheGreenBee wrote: HD is the worst caster in the mix in my opinion. He just doesn't know what's going on half of the time. The only thing he's good at is act excited.
You think hd is the least knowledgeable? What are you watching lol
I agree with him. Many times that HD says something, Pain User disagrees and then drops knowledge bombs.
People are saying that TB has no knowledge of the game, but I haven't found that to be the case. He's made plenty of correct predictions, references to pros, and other indicators of a decent understanding of the game. The fact that people find TB's voice annoying or style unappealing isn't the same as him not knowing about the games.
The casters are pretty good, Dj and the duo Painuser/HD. The only problem i have with TB is that he is really lacking on the game knowledge department. He doesn't know the current meta game or what's going on with sc2. I don't even know if he still plays the game. Dj always cast games and Pain/HD are master level. But yeh you really don't need to have a diploma to know the game or need a lot to cast games. I think you just need the current popular strat pros/players are doing and of course information of each player.
On April 23 2011 13:11 gamecrazy wrote: IPL has certainly been very impressively executed. The entertainment value, stream quality is excellent. I feel like there wasn't very much transparency with the community on how IPL would select players/etc. However, that aside, its a great thing to watch.
This is kind of what bothers me. A lot of people are being seduced by the IPL's production value, but they haven't demonstrated anything that makes me think that are running anything but a cool invitational with fun graphics.
On April 23 2011 13:51 TheGreenBee wrote: HD is the worst caster in the mix in my opinion. He just doesn't know what's going on half of the time. The only thing he's good at is act excited.
You think hd is the least knowledgeable? What are you watching lol
I agree with him. Many times that HD says something, Pain User disagrees and then drops knowledge bombs.
People are saying that TB has no knowledge of the game, but I haven't found that to be the case. He's made plenty of correct predictions, references to pros, and other indicators of a decent understanding of the game. The fact that people find TB's voice annoying or style unappealing isn't the same as him not knowing about the games.
While I agree with everything you say... I do think you are just lowering the bar by which you judge TB as knowledgeable. Does he know nothing about the game? of course not, you are right. But does he know as much as a good commentator should for a premier starcraft league? I do not believe so. So yea he does get most of the general stuff right. So saying he knows nothing and stuff is indeed wrong. But I wouldn't dismiss the fact that he definitely has a lot to learn before a lot of people take him seriously...
On April 23 2011 13:11 gamecrazy wrote: IPL has certainly been very impressively executed. The entertainment value, stream quality is excellent. I feel like there wasn't very much transparency with the community on how IPL would select players/etc. However, that aside, its a great thing to watch.
Thanks for your positive comments! Your comment about transparency confuses me though, as I feel like it's been a pretty much 'ask me anything' situation with TL and we've gone to great lengths to be as transparent as possible. There was a ton of talk about players at the outset of the announcement, but not lately because it's been covered already.
Further, I posted the following on the main announcement post:
"Q: Why was player <X> or <Y> not involved with this?
A: Unfortunately with a set of 16 players, we had to make hard choices and decisions about who we extended invites to. Some popular players did have conflicts with the scheduling or did not want to participate, and there was not much we could do that about. We feel like we have a strong range of players that have different play styles and will provide entertaining matches. We hope to see the popular players we weren't able to extend an invitation to excel in the IPL 2 qualifiers and participate next season!"
To clarify, we based our invites mostly based on 1) availability 2) community awareness 3) viewership potential 4) skill level and 5) past tournament results, in no particular order. If there's ever something people feel confused about, just ask, or look around. I don't want a false impression that we're not being transparent starting to circulate.
On April 23 2011 15:56 Defacer wrote: This is kind of what bothers me. A lot of people are being seduced by the IPL's production value, but they haven't demonstrated anything that makes me think that are running anything but a cool invitational with fun graphics.
I'm not actually sure what you mean by this. Demonstrate that we're going to be sticking around, or what exactly is meant? If you can clarify what you mean I will do what I can to put your mind at ease.
On April 22 2011 10:17 Whiplash wrote: I tuned in to watch it and was instantly impressed. The production quality is INCREDIBLE. This is what the NASL should have been.
I echo this sentiment strongly.
The other thing I have to mention is that DjWheat is actually a really good solo caster, I've never seen him do it before but he can handle it quite well.
I loved the stream, I watched on the 1080p and not once did it crash or jutter along like other streams and I am in Australia which makes it even more epic that I can watch it in HD smoothly. Seriously, the best stream I ever watched. The audio was crystal clear and they had some fantastic casters on there as well. Cannot wait till tomorrow to watch it again. It was seriously fantastic.
On April 23 2011 13:51 TheGreenBee wrote: HD is the worst caster in the mix in my opinion. He just doesn't know what's going on half of the time. The only thing he's good at is act excited.
You think hd is the least knowledgeable? What are you watching lol
I agree with him. Many times that HD says something, Pain User disagrees and then drops knowledge bombs.
People are saying that TB has no knowledge of the game, but I haven't found that to be the case. He's made plenty of correct predictions, references to pros, and other indicators of a decent understanding of the game. The fact that people find TB's voice annoying or style unappealing isn't the same as him not knowing about the games.
While I agree with everything you say... I do think you are just lowering the bar by which you judge TB as knowledgeable. Does he know nothing about the game? of course not, you are right. But does he know as much as a good commentator should for a premier starcraft league? I do not believe so. So yea he does get most of the general stuff right. So saying he knows nothing and stuff is indeed wrong. But I wouldn't dismiss the fact that he definitely has a lot to learn before a lot of people take him seriously...
Fair enough. He certainly has a long way to go before he becomes the knowledge equivalent of a Day[9], Tasteless, or Artosis!
Obviously the production is top notch and up to par with GSL and Dreamhack Invitational. That's like common knowledge by now. Since IGN is just doing a test run in a whole different format I feel there's no point in comparing anything beyond the games, stream and layout.
Speaking of games, last night's set of games was even better than the first and sported more back and forth action and innovative play. Of course, that's nothing IGN can control but it's always a plus when the games turn out to be amazing as well.
First time hearing the HD/PainUser combo and they've got some great synergy going there. Wheat and TB are obviously good too and perform well as solo casters. The amount of analysis they can provide are sufficient and balanced out by their in-your-face entertainment value. I kind of feel that if you possess more knowledge than them, you don't need it spelled out for you and can enjoy them for the excitement. And in the case you know less about the game, they can still give some decent pointers and alert you of the most essential things. Although, if you care little for entertainment and watch for learning and analysis, then you're probably in the wrong place.
I was gonna watch some vods today but in the middle of vod it freezes and I get stuck in loading thing.Anyone else have same problem? PS:It was working fine until today.
yeah dual casting would be mo fun.. and also i feel its a bit of a shame there are no EU/KOR players but i suppose we already have nasl and tsl for cross realm tournaments..
On April 23 2011 13:19 Ruyguy wrote: For me it's going to come down to the players actually playing on that day. For example, tomorrow's IPL lineup/players aren't my favourite, so I'm going to watch MC and Select play tomorrow in the NASL. I'm going to give the NASL $25 just because I can, no I'm not going to watch all the VOD's, I might even watch IPL more than NASL, but the only way for e-sports to grow is for the community contribute. It can't always be free TSL, free IPL, free showmatches forever.
1. Get tons of viewers for free events 2. Show sponsors advertising opportunity 3. ??? 4. Free event forever and make money for org running it
thats exactly what ive been saying so often in the various nasl threads.
you dont grow things by cutting out tons of potential viewers. NASL is maybe the worst concept for "growing" esports overall. i cant tell my buddy "hey that nasl match was awesome! check this vod!". instead the "hardcore" part of the community gets forced to pay.
esports has to get more people into it and build a solid foundation. if it only can work if tons of people blindly throw money at it then its not ready yet.
On April 23 2011 19:41 B.I.G. wrote: yeah dual casting would be mo fun.. and also i feel its a bit of a shame there are no EU/KOR players but i suppose we already have nasl and tsl for cross realm tournaments..
this season is pretty much a test season. playpool will be way different and more open season2. also they already said they are def considering to more/all dualcasting for season2. :>
Loving this league so far. Only issue i have was the obvious syncing issues in the iNcontrol vs Spades VoDs. Caster's replay was ahead of what we were seeing, and we could hear their computer's sound i think, which was ahead of the sound of what we were seeing.
This is the most important issue when not casting live, syncing HAS to be perfect .... everything else looks really good! not a huge HD fan but i thought he did pretty good with painuser.
CatzPyjamas or whatever his name is was absolutely incredible, honestly one of the most soothing voices ever. Seriously, it sounded as if I was listening to an advertisement.
when you click on a video you should be able to choose all the game from the bottom of the popup. looks like the transparency is f'ed up tho so you'll have to full screen it to not see the flash or use an adblocker i guess. double click the video to go full screen.
Note to the developers: fix the wmode on your flash ad and fb plugin ^_^
I dont know if this has been said already or even if its already in effect, but i think it would be awesome if the VODs could be added to YouTube. I think it would attract even more new fans to the scene with the VODs coming straight from the most recognised gaming site on the net.
I really dislike IGN's popup flash video plugin, I would've much preferred it to be embedded into an actual page so I could scale it as I wanted to. That, and for some reason, Ant downloader doesn't recognize the FLV's playing in IGN's setup...><
EDIT: Since the VODs are free, why don't they offer downloads or something? I can't stand watching VODs in embedded players at all, and since there's no issue of piracy for free content, I would really like a download link...I like my VOD's to-go.
On April 23 2011 21:13 Project Psycho wrote: I dont know if this has been said already or even if its already in effect, but i think it would be awesome if the VODs could be added to YouTube. I think it would attract even more new fans to the scene with the VODs coming straight from the most recognised gaming site on the net.
We are able to upload the first of each series to our Youtube channels.
+great production (obviously) -'meh' player pool +mostly good casters -total biscsuit +free vods -live broadcast at 2am/3am in europe
Overall i'm much more impressed than i originally anticipated. I hope they added better players for season two though. A lot of the games are pretty uninteresting to me, although having the results spoiled probably didn't help.
On April 23 2011 13:19 Ruyguy wrote: For me it's going to come down to the players actually playing on that day. For example, tomorrow's IPL lineup/players aren't my favourite, so I'm going to watch MC and Select play tomorrow in the NASL. I'm going to give the NASL $25 just because I can, no I'm not going to watch all the VOD's, I might even watch IPL more than NASL, but the only way for e-sports to grow is for the community contribute. It can't always be free TSL, free IPL, free showmatches forever.
1. Get tons of viewers for free events 2. Show sponsors advertising opportunity 3. ??? 4. Free event forever and make money for org running it
100% agree. The question is whether the market is big enough to have those sponsors. Free streaming is a great thing to have especially in NASL's case because they re-stream for Europeans. Only the hardcore fans pay money for the VODs. And I think free VODs are more important than leagues realise. It's a bit selfish from me because I am not a player but I think MC wouldn't be upset with 30k less for a GSL win, but 40% more viewers. Tastosis says the subsription money goes to sustaining the service, but putting it on youtube would cost nothing. In my opinion something like the GSL would f*ing explode on youtube with proper promotion.
Then again I don't think GSL, NASL organisers are too stupid to see what what people at TSL and IPL see. It must be something what we don't know.
Yeah I saw videos related to the league but imo it's pretty messed up and hard to navigate. It should be easier to find each game of each set, like group game 1, 2 and 3 together.
I must say the production values really are shiny.
Despite what I've heard about justin.tv and europe I've been able to watch at 1080p smoothly. Well except for that once when all of justin.tv went down but that's another matter. The cartoon versions of the players were a nice stylistic touch in contrast to GSL's short clips of people in black backgrounds making fighting poses. No complaints on the sound, things were done well.
Then it comes down to players and casters. Unfortunately despite all the positives, with the limited time available to me I just don't see myself watching IGN anytime soon except semis/finals because there just isn't enough star power (biased perspective). Now I know this is a trial run but I really hope IPL get some more really good players in and/or revise the not inviting europeans and koreans thing. To me it just seems like such a shame to have such a great production and not milk it more.
Regarding casters, plenty of my friends are hating on some for their lack of ingame knowledge and I kind of agree. There have been many a cringe worthy moments. I was tuning in yesterday and I heard a solo caster with a completely monotonous voice do a play by play of complete deadtime for I don't know how long. It was so boring I just switched to doing something else. I'm sorry I don't even know who it was. Atleast TB and DJWheat can fake enthusiasm properly. It's not exactly everyone that has such a positive and bubbly voice. I think it has been a great disservice to both of them that they weren't paired with an analytical caster. I don't expect grandmaster player experience from any of them but if they were to improve their in game knowledge and reduce the amount of wait whut moments they'd be great casters.
On April 23 2011 21:30 KaiserJohan wrote: Yeah I saw videos related to the league but imo it's pretty messed up and hard to navigate. It should be easier to find each game of each set, like group game 1, 2 and 3 together.
On April 23 2011 20:30 pStar wrote: CatzPyjamas or whatever his name is was absolutely incredible, honestly one of the most soothing voices ever. Seriously, it sounded as if I was listening to an advertisement.
I didn't like his commentary at all. He had nothing to talk about most of the time, just stating the obvious: "He's building pylon at 9. Now gate at 13. He's moving out." TB did better job than i expected, DjWheat is ok and HD+Painuser worked very well because its 2 casters and one of them is pro gamer, but that guy you are talking about... after first game with his commentary i muted the stream and turned my music on, because he wasn't giving any information whatsoever.
IGNProLeague is really amazing. It has a chance to attract many new ppl to the scene. Especially TotalBiscuit is awesome when it comes to get new ppl excited about the games, all the friends I show some games love him. Other casters are really good too. (Really was impressed by the good analysis from Painuser) Really good concept, I love it so far. (despite for some problems i have with the embedded player on the website) We dont really need to compare to NASL. They have some problems, but all in all I think NASL with its huge player-pool and awesome tournament system (divisions...) will absolutly end up beeing a great League as well.
On April 23 2011 13:19 Ruyguy wrote: For me it's going to come down to the players actually playing on that day. For example, tomorrow's IPL lineup/players aren't my favourite, so I'm going to watch MC and Select play tomorrow in the NASL. I'm going to give the NASL $25 just because I can, no I'm not going to watch all the VOD's, I might even watch IPL more than NASL, but the only way for e-sports to grow is for the community contribute. It can't always be free TSL, free IPL, free showmatches forever.
1. Get tons of viewers for free events 2. Show sponsors advertising opportunity 3. ??? 4. Free event forever and make money for org running it
100% agree. The question is whether the market is big enough to have those sponsors. Free streaming is a great thing to have especially in NASL's case because they re-stream for Europeans. Only the hardcore fans pay money for the VODs. And I think free VODs are more important than leagues realise. It's a bit selfish from me because I am not a player but I think MC wouldn't be upset with 30k less for a GSL win, but 40% more viewers. Tastosis says the subsription money goes to sustaining the service, but putting it on youtube would cost nothing. In my opinion something like the GSL would f*ing explode on youtube with proper promotion.
Then again I don't think GSL, NASL organisers are too stupid to see what what people at TSL and IPL see. It must be something what we don't know.
imo sc2 advertising is pretty much the most effective you can get as a company. you hit right into your target group , get TONS of views, get a nice image and its not that expensive.
and esports/leagues can work well without forcing people to spend big money on it. look at esl. they do their stuff for years across several games with free vods and a very cheap premium service which gives acces to HQ stream/vods.
tbh im not sure why nasl decided against it. maybe they thought "gsl does it, why cant we?" or they desperatly needed money or whatever. but imho thats one of the mainreasons why nasl is declining while IGNleague is exploding. one is a free high quality testphase of a "communityleague" that you can watch whenever you want while the other is a costly very bumby testphase of a "businessleague".
ofcourse i realize both(all leagues) are business in the end. but the feel and perception for the customer/viewer are vastly different between "free lq livestream,pay for evrything else or gtfo", "free lq stream/vods, optional pay for hq if you want" and "free evrything! have fun :D".
Does no one else worry about patronizing a company owned by Rupert Murdoch? I just can't bring myself to have anything to do with IGN, regardless of how high quality it is.
The commentators on IGN are terrible; the analysis is virtually non-existent, they simply state what each player is currently doing. Probably the most boring commentary I've ever heard. It also doesn't help that the times I've tuned in it's always a solo commentator which makes it even worse.
I don't really understand why these new leagues don't understand that the most effective commentary is a duo, with one person primarily being the color and the other analyzing the possible strategies that each player is executing. Throw in some amusing banter between the commentators for the downtime when neither player is doing anything that interesting. Is it really that hard to find two people like that? Look at almost any professional sport and that's what they do.
The production quality is the best I've seen from a non-Korean tournament, it's just too bad that its weighed down by the commentators.
I wish people would stop comparing an endevour live the NASL with the TSL and IPL.
they are working from completely different formats, IPL is cast from replays, a week before airing. This means they have a week to edit and encode the videos. They don't have interviews, or analysis on the matches or maps, and no live video of the casters. Thats simply nothing like as complicated as the NASL broadcast which has live casters, casting live games, with analysis and interviews, edited and encoded in under 48 hours for broadcast..... and Friday night's broadcast was almost perfect quality..... its such a shame people give up on things so damn fast these days.
The TSL is similar to the IPL production wise, except that its broadcast live, using replays. But again, no live caster video, only game footage and overlays. Which are way simpler than NASL. Both IPL and TSL are very polished, and awesome, but simply not of the same ambition as NASL.
Short memories seem to be evident in this community, because the first 3 seasons of GSL had a terrible streaming experience and the VOD's took forever to load and were choppy because they simply didn't have the bandwidth they needed. Everyone still paid and stuck with them, they said they were improving the stream and they did..... NASL's free stream is the same quality as the GSL PAID stream, NASL is $25 for 3 months of 25 matches per week, 1080p stream and VODs. GSL is $10 per month and only runs 3 out of 4 weeks in that month, showing a max of 4 bo3 matches per day. People rarely complain about GSL anymore, but it took them 3 months of us sticking with them before they got it right.
If we gave organisations a chance to work out the kinks, which the guys at wellplayed.org got to do with the SC Reddit opens and the SCRI, all of which had excellent production, then we might be more satisfied. Criticism is great, but shouting at the top of your voice how shit something is and then not giving them more than 48 hours to fix everything is just moronic.
On April 23 2011 22:42 SnuggleZhenya wrote: Does no one else worry about patronizing a company owned by Rupert Murdoch? I just can't bring myself to have anything to do with IGN, regardless of how high quality it is.
If I let my politics guide all of my decisions about who to patronize, I might starve to death. I'm shopping at Target right now, even though the owners are homophobic jerks. Chik-fil-a is run by fundamentalists, but the chicken sandwiches are delicious.
On April 23 2011 22:42 SnuggleZhenya wrote: Does no one else worry about patronizing a company owned by Rupert Murdoch? I just can't bring myself to have anything to do with IGN, regardless of how high quality it is.
If I let my politics guide all of my decisions about who to patronize, I might starve to death. I'm shopping at Target right now, even though the owners are homophobic jerks. Chik-fil-a is run by fundamentalists, but the chicken sandwiches are delicious.
I think by "Chik-fil-a" you mean: "Fuck, it's Sunday"
but yeah, other than the leaked brackets, I think IGN did an awesome job.
On April 23 2011 14:47 Alex.IGN wrote: VODs of Day 2 are up! To find games from previous days, filter by games. This site is still very much a work in progress so the site will improve! Please continue to give us feedback as the site evolves! http://www.ign.com/ipl/videos
Please, if you're not going to allow downloading the VODs, at least make it possible to load the whole video without having to actually be watching it, because for people with slow connection, you can't watch it directly, and if you leave it loading, it will only load a couple minutes and then stop.
I mean, make it able to press play, start loading, press pause, and then wait untill the whole video is loaded so I can watch without pauses.
It doesn't do that for you? It loads for me just fine when I pause.
Nope, it doesn't.
It's really not "bad connection friendly".
I have to watch 2 minutes, then wait it load another 2, then watch those 2 and wait even more. And I can't fast forward too...
IGN is a great production. The quality is unrivaled. I do wish they could find casters that are players. The play-by-play casting may be entertaining to others but I want in the minds of the players and casting by somebody who knows what they are talking about not just some mindless babble about how this 1 stalker is doing some sick micro! and has like 4 kills! I can see that, don't need anybody to tell me
On April 24 2011 02:48 Halcyondaze wrote: IGN is a great production. The quality is unrivaled. I do wish they could find casters that are players. The play-by-play casting may be entertaining to others but I want in the minds of the players and casting by somebody who knows what they are talking about not just some mindless babble about how this 1 stalker is doing some sick micro! and has like 4 kills! I can see that, don't need anybody to tell me
The IGN is not aimed at hardcore SC2 fans, it is aimed at a casual audience, hence the commentary is simple, for the simple man/woman.
Hell most people on this forums could do without commentary in ANY sc2 game and fully understand what is going on, who is ahead etcetera. It is not aimed at you, it is aimed at a much broader audience.
On April 23 2011 23:24 emythrel wrote: I wish people would stop comparing an endevour live the NASL with the TSL and IPL.
they are working from completely different formats, IPL is cast from replays, a week before airing. This means they have a week to edit and encode the videos. They don't have interviews, or analysis on the matches or maps, and no live video of the casters. Thats simply nothing like as complicated as the NASL broadcast which has live casters, casting live games, with analysis and interviews, edited and encoded in under 48 hours for broadcast..... and Friday night's broadcast was almost perfect quality..... its such a shame people give up on things so damn fast these days.
The TSL is similar to the IPL production wise, except that its broadcast live, using replays. But again, no live caster video, only game footage and overlays. Which are way simpler than NASL. Both IPL and TSL are very polished, and awesome, but simply not of the same ambition as NASL.
Short memories seem to be evident in this community, because the first 3 seasons of GSL had a terrible streaming experience and the VOD's took forever to load and were choppy because they simply didn't have the bandwidth they needed. Everyone still paid and stuck with them, they said they were improving the stream and they did..... NASL's free stream is the same quality as the GSL PAID stream, NASL is $25 for 3 months of 25 matches per week, 1080p stream and VODs. GSL is $10 per month and only runs 3 out of 4 weeks in that month, showing a max of 4 bo3 matches per day. People rarely complain about GSL anymore, but it took them 3 months of us sticking with them before they got it right.
If we gave organisations a chance to work out the kinks, which the guys at wellplayed.org got to do with the SC Reddit opens and the SCRI, all of which had excellent production, then we might be more satisfied. Criticism is great, but shouting at the top of your voice how shit something is and then not giving them more than 48 hours to fix everything is just moronic.
Well said, give NASL a chance guys. It has insane potential. A constant supply of TOP quality games. Really good players and a high prize pool. Give them a chance to get back on their feet and give us something amazing.
Well, they had HD casting with PainUser; was really the best of both worlds, I thought.
Maybe would be wise of them to attach a professional to each established play-by-play caster as a matter of course but I don't think they suffer too much for it.
The quality of production as presented is really really good but I think they need to figure something out to make this feel like an actual tournament. So far, it's a bit like random youtube casts strung together.
Casters changing is to blame maybe, but definitely that they apparently don't know what order the games will be shown in. Or the casters just did them whenever they felt like it and I think it shows.
IGN seems to serve the people that are more casual viewers. The production costs must be a lot due to the quality shown. I also loved the fact that there is not long pre-show before the actual show. Caster wise, I dont think I have a preference for NASL or IGNProLeague.
Pros: Rediculoulsy good production values Weren't overly ambitious: Starting small, working towards larger endeavors Great graphics Popular, experienced casters. Doesn't alienate N00bs or pros. 1080p stream FREE VODS!!! <--- The Best Interviews and Hype videos Korean Player anouncer!
Cons: Not a lot of players yet... Few big names No international players CatsPajamas...
Pros: Artosis Highest production values It's in Korea Cultural significance All the best Korean Progamers Reasonable balance of Free/Pay content Casted Live The players are actually there, in studio
Cons: Tasteless Blizzards heavy-handed method of enforcing its IP rights. Lack of international players Self-focused
Things were really well done by IGN. I echo alot of the compliments in this thread.
Just wanted to specifically give some props to HD and PainUser who were really good together. The conversation between the two is really smooth. I feel like they're the lead commentary booth, reserved for casting championship and all the most important matches.
Although I'd prefer expert commentary, I'm actually ok with TotalBiscuit doing a solo cast as long as it isn't critical matches. He's more of a personality caster, so he's got that going for him if you like it, but I can see him turning others off. It can be as much about him as about the sc2 match you're watching. Of course, I'd try him out with some expert analyst, but I'm not sure who would have good chemistry with him.
As for DJWheat, I like him, but he really needs a analyst co-caster imo. He's not as a strong of a personality caster. He's always worked really well with Day9, so that's the first person that comes to mind.
Pros: Rediculoulsy good production values Weren't overly ambitious: Starting small, working towards larger endeavors Great graphics Popular, experienced casters. Doesn't alienate N00bs or pros. 1080p stream FREE VODS!!! <--- The Best Interviews and Hype videos Korean Player anouncer!
Cons: Not a lot of players yet... Few big names No international players CatsPajamas...
Pros: Artosis Highest production values It's in Korea Cultural significance All the best Korean Progamers Reasonable balance of Free/Pay content Casted Live The players are actually there, in studio
Cons: Tasteless Blizzards heavy-handed method of enforcing its IP rights. Lack of international players Self-focused
Wait... Did you not read what you said for the GSL and NASL. GSL Pro: Reasonable balance of Free/Pay content NASL Con: PAY VODs...
They're the exact same model. You have to pay for vods for both of them. GOM provides 1 free for all thematches as a teaser but you need to pay for the rest. :/ Except for their benefit Japan event, but they're doing that to raise donations.
I wish one of these American leagues other than TSL could organize their VODs in some sort of professional manner. I clicked on the iNcontrol match from the videos page on the IPL page and five video popped up and from the names of those videos i could see the results of the first match... Please just go to GOM.tv and mimic their schedule page and their VOD set up. It's perfect, don;t reinvent the wheel, just organize them into matches and add a fake no-spoiler video and be done. It doesn't seem like it could possibly be that hard... gee whiz
On April 24 2011 03:29 Spicy Pepper wrote: As for DJWheat, I like him, but he really needs a analyst co-caster imo. He's not as a strong of a personality caster.
How is this possible? I'm an obviously bias Zerg caster. You must play Terran ^_^
On April 24 2011 02:48 Halcyondaze wrote: IGN is a great production. The quality is unrivaled. I do wish they could find casters that are players. The play-by-play casting may be entertaining to others but I want in the minds of the players and casting by somebody who knows what they are talking about not just some mindless babble about how this 1 stalker is doing some sick micro! and has like 4 kills! I can see that, don't need anybody to tell me
Haha I agree so much with this. I'm waiting for a caster to just be silent for a while
On April 24 2011 02:48 Halcyondaze wrote: IGN is a great production. The quality is unrivaled. I do wish they could find casters that are players. The play-by-play casting may be entertaining to others but I want in the minds of the players and casting by somebody who knows what they are talking about not just some mindless babble about how this 1 stalker is doing some sick micro! and has like 4 kills! I can see that, don't need anybody to tell me
Haha I agree so much with this. I'm waiting for a caster to just be silent for a while
One of the largest complaints about the NASL is that the casters ARE players. I'm not saying Gretorp/INcontrol are bad (I like them), but what you're essentially asking for is NASL casting since I can't think of any players out there who cast at their level who also play at a high level.
On April 24 2011 02:48 Halcyondaze wrote: IGN is a great production. The quality is unrivaled. I do wish they could find casters that are players. The play-by-play casting may be entertaining to others but I want in the minds of the players and casting by somebody who knows what they are talking about not just some mindless babble about how this 1 stalker is doing some sick micro! and has like 4 kills! I can see that, don't need anybody to tell me
Haha I agree so much with this. I'm waiting for a caster to just be silent for a while
That's something that I've always enjoyed about German soccer commentators lot of them have been commentating for so long that they know when they can just let the game speak for it's self. I think that will come to sc2 as casters become more experienced.
On April 24 2011 08:30 asdd wrote: Love wheats casting and I'm in grandmaster. I don't understand the hate on play by play casters by the people on tl. Great work IGN!
This. It seems that it's low to mid level players that dislike play by play, but top tier guys hate when people make wild predictions or theories about their play. Every grandmasters player I've met in person has loved my casting, but it is usually Joe platinum player that gets mad I only do play by play. :D Analysis is best when combined with play by play. For those wondering, the IPL is using this season as a test of production. Casters are doing work from their home. It's difficult for me to cast with anyone else because I live in St. Louis. However, I do believe in the effectiveness of dual casters.
On April 24 2011 08:30 asdd wrote: Love wheats casting and I'm in grandmaster. I don't understand the hate on play by play casters by the people on tl. Great work IGN!
This. It seems that it's low to mid level players that dislike play by play, but top tier guys hate when people make wild predictions or theories about their play. Every grandmasters player I've met in person has loved my casting, but it is usually Joe platinum player that gets mad I only do play by play. :D Analysis is best when combined with play by play. For those wondering, the IPL is using this season as a test of production. Casters are doing work from their home. It's difficult for me to cast with anyone else because I live in St. Louis. However, I do believe in the effectiveness of dual casters.
That's usually because top-tier players have less to gain hearing analysis than lower-league players that have a lot more to learn and to gain watching a match.
If one can enjoy a match and learn from it, that's probably what they're looking for.
On April 24 2011 02:48 Halcyondaze wrote: IGN is a great production. The quality is unrivaled. I do wish they could find casters that are players. The play-by-play casting may be entertaining to others but I want in the minds of the players and casting by somebody who knows what they are talking about not just some mindless babble about how this 1 stalker is doing some sick micro! and has like 4 kills! I can see that, don't need anybody to tell me
Haha I agree so much with this. I'm waiting for a caster to just be silent for a while
One of the largest complaints about the NASL is that the casters ARE players. I'm not saying Gretorp/INcontrol are bad (I like them), but what you're essentially asking for is NASL casting since I can't think of any players out there who cast at their level who also play at a high level.
I guess you can't make everybody happy.
The criticism is not that they are players, its that they aren't seasoned casters. But give it a month or so of casting every day and they will get better.... They have a solid foundation in depth game knowledge and the casting skill will come really easily because of that. Its a LOT harder to have good casting skills and try to pick up game knowledge over time.
EDIT (no you can't make everyone happy, but saying that seems like a self-righteous cop out in a lot of situations, you can always make more people happy than you currently do ^_^ (or at least thats the attitude a person taking criticism should have))
Hey guys just wanted to let everyone know that I really appreciate the support. This is my first time casting any sort of major event and I'm loving the reception. Also glad everyone is loving the IPL in general I think it has a ton of potential.
That being said I think people should stop comparing IPL to NASL/GSL etc. All of these organizations are promoting something we love I feel we should be content to support them all. Also as far as the casting critiques try to keep it positive/informative, I can speak personally when I say it hurts for someone to bash your final casting product and there isn't anything you can learn from someone saying "YOU HAVE NO GAME KNOWLEDGE"
On April 24 2011 02:48 Halcyondaze wrote: IGN is a great production. The quality is unrivaled. I do wish they could find casters that are players. The play-by-play casting may be entertaining to others but I want in the minds of the players and casting by somebody who knows what they are talking about not just some mindless babble about how this 1 stalker is doing some sick micro! and has like 4 kills! I can see that, don't need anybody to tell me
Yeah, I agree. As much as I like having distinguished casters calling the play-by-play, there something is still missing. PainUser's analysis is ok, I guess. I expected a little more out of him to be honest. With the rest of the commentator's, its more along the lines of, "Yes, let's get excited and call the play-by-play." Play-by-play is fine, but you need some color. It's not an easy job when you get one bo3 to cast in each round and your doing it solo. I understand that. We have to keep in mind, they're trying to market this towards the general, populace gamer as well.
After seeing this thread i tuned in to check it out.
ITS AWESOME ! Its just like i expected the NASL to be. I hope NASL learns from IGN and gets as good as this. It really means something, when your production is better than TSL3 (Best Online Production until now).
I don't know if anyone else feels this way; but when I hear TotalBisquit commentating, I feel as though I should be laughing... in a good way. Much love to the IGN guys... and TotalBisquit.
On April 24 2011 12:33 Scribble wrote: How do you view vods from previous days?
Select "Games" from the filter menu and then hit filter!
Thank you. That's a little non-intuitive though. Maybe you guys could add a "Day 1," "Day 2," etc. category to the filters? Otherwise you just get the most recent day or two of games with the default filters. (=
Also, super glad to see the page format already changed a bit from day 1, so that you have the non-spoilery "game 1-3" buttons like on Gom's vods. Great job on that. :D
The next time i try to load an IPL vod and it is giving big choppy lag spikes for no good reason, i'm going to lose my mind...
IPL: ever seen a youtube vid? ever watched the GSL? ever watched ANY vod at all ever?! vods aren't supposed to be choppy when the load bar is well ahead of the progress bar..
It doesn't always happen this way, but man when it does i want to throw something through a window..
hope you can hear my applause from hear IGN, the only thing even remotely wrong with your league was the VOD system which you fixed post-haste. holy schnikes, you guys rule. that was fast. love the commentators. Biscuit makes me feel like i am watching a 1920s horse race, in a good way!
On April 24 2011 13:02 NoahNickels wrote: hope you can hear my applause from hear IGN, the only thing even remotely wrong with your league was the VOD system which you fixed post-haste. holy schnikes, you guys rule. that was fast. love the commentators. Biscuit makes me feel like i am watching a 1920s horse race, in a good way!
Thanks! Keep giving us feedback as our website evolves and becomes better! This whole season is all about making the optimal setup for IPL Season Two!
On April 24 2011 13:02 NoahNickels wrote: hope you can hear my applause from hear IGN, the only thing even remotely wrong with your league was the VOD system which you fixed post-haste. holy schnikes, you guys rule. that was fast. love the commentators. Biscuit makes me feel like i am watching a 1920s horse race, in a good way!
Thanks! Keep giving us feedback as our website evolves and becomes better! This whole season is all about making the optimal setup for IPL Season Two!
It's so sick that you guys fix problems you hear about! Mucho <3
eugh so frustrated that the vods are choppy for me.. wtf is the "Auto" button with the connection strength next to it? Why do I spike every time that bar fluctuates?
For christ's sake IGN, please make the vods watchable for me.. I'm talking about standard def here, never even bothered with HD..
I don't watch 1080p streams because they tend to chop for me.. But I expect to be able to watch whatever vods I want, because there's this crazy concept of a "loading bar" which seems to actually mean something for every vod engine except IPL..
I literally can't watch IPL vods. So disappointing. Why can't you cross-post the vods on youtube like TSL does? or on justin.tv like NASL does?
On April 25 2011 07:31 teacash wrote: eugh so frustrated that the vods are choppy for me.. wtf is the "Auto" button with the connection strength next to it? Why do I spike every time that bar fluctuates?
For christ's sake IGN, please make the vods watchable for me.. I'm talking about standard def here, never even bothered with HD..
I don't watch 1080p streams because they tend to chop for me.. But I expect to be able to watch whatever vods I want, because there's this crazy concept of a "loading bar" which seems to actually mean something for every vod engine except IPL..
I literally can't watch IPL vods. So disappointing. Why can't you cross-post the vods on youtube like TSL does? or on justin.tv like NASL does?
*ragequit*
I'm trying to figure out the exact issue here, we've willing to work with people but we probably need some information. The IGN video player auto-adjusts its quality to best fit the bandwidth that you're downloading the video content at so that might be it. When you say you literally can't watch the IPL vods what do you actually mean? Like does it not load, is it choppy, does it take a long time to load, or what specifically? We need some details to be able to assist you. We will have our VODs up on youtube in the near future.
Im a newcomer to catspajamas and Painuser as casters, but have been really impressed and found the experience very enjoyable, and thats even after being spoiled by tastosis. keep up the good work and gl for season 2 !
i find it funny that this is basically a slap in the face to NASL.
everyone loves this, everyone hated NASL.
well, thats just what happens. turns out people arent just "haters", but they were desperate for something refreshing and well done after NASL. i imagine this league wouldnt get THIS much praise if it wasnt for NASL lowering the standard a week before :p but yeah. haha.
On April 25 2011 07:31 teacash wrote: eugh so frustrated that the vods are choppy for me.. wtf is the "Auto" button with the connection strength next to it? Why do I spike every time that bar fluctuates?
For christ's sake IGN, please make the vods watchable for me.. I'm talking about standard def here, never even bothered with HD..
I don't watch 1080p streams because they tend to chop for me.. But I expect to be able to watch whatever vods I want, because there's this crazy concept of a "loading bar" which seems to actually mean something for every vod engine except IPL..
I literally can't watch IPL vods. So disappointing. Why can't you cross-post the vods on youtube like TSL does? or on justin.tv like NASL does?
*ragequit*
How about stop raging and being such a spoilt little brat and post actually more details on what goes wrong and maybe people will help you. Toys back in the pram.
On April 25 2011 07:31 teacash wrote: eugh so frustrated that the vods are choppy for me.. wtf is the "Auto" button with the connection strength next to it? Why do I spike every time that bar fluctuates?
For christ's sake IGN, please make the vods watchable for me.. I'm talking about standard def here, never even bothered with HD..
I don't watch 1080p streams because they tend to chop for me.. But I expect to be able to watch whatever vods I want, because there's this crazy concept of a "loading bar" which seems to actually mean something for every vod engine except IPL..
I literally can't watch IPL vods. So disappointing. Why can't you cross-post the vods on youtube like TSL does? or on justin.tv like NASL does?
*ragequit*
I'm trying to figure out the exact issue here, we've willing to work with people but we probably need some information. The IGN video player auto-adjusts its quality to best fit the bandwidth that you're downloading the video content at so that might be it. When you say you literally can't watch the IPL vods what do you actually mean? Like does it not load, is it choppy, does it take a long time to load, or what specifically? We need some details to be able to assist you. We will have our VODs up on youtube in the near future.
Thanks for the reply. I can watch the vods if i want, but i get 3 second lag spikes every 15-20 seconds It loads just fine, as in the load bar goes along ahead of the progress bar just like on youtube.
What you mention (the auto-adjusting based on bandwidth) is almost certainly the problem.. Every time it "Auto" adjusts, i get a lag spike. If you could add in the option to manually choose a set quality like other vod players do, i likely wouldnt have this problem. I have actually watched a vod on IPL that wasnt choppy a few days ago, but most times they are choppy and so unwatchable.
It's absolutely not an issue of me not letting the video load.. the vod loads perfectly fine, but i still get lag spikes for no good reason
Guys just one little thing (this is nit picking really), when the game is over, can you let the screen linger for just a bit longer. the graphic is cool, but shutting the screen off the next second after gg, feels a little empty, it's quite nice to see state of the game after the final battle for just a second. But I'm really enjoying the league guys, great job.
People don't like TB, but I for one absolutely love his style.
Every now and then its really nice to watch a game of starcraft as pure entertainment. Not predicting fights before they happen or showing their knowledge. He just puts on a show, and he does it well.
IGNProLeague is simply amazing, together with tsl its a great standard to judge future leagues and tournaments with, production, casting, quality its all g000d
On April 25 2011 12:41 pluvos wrote: IGNProLeague is simply amazing, together with tsl its a great standard to judge future leagues and tournaments with, production, casting, quality its all g000d
I agree with this 100%. I am really enjoying watching these matches, even the boring games are made so much better because of how neat and well done everything is!
Massive massive ups to the IGN Pro League. The post production quality and presentation are of the highest quality. The stream quality is also phenomenal. To round everything off the matches have been intense and captivating. We will definitely be covering the IPL on upcoming episodes of the GG Rated Liveshow.
On April 25 2011 12:59 ggrated wrote: Massive massive ups to the IGN Pro League. The post production quality and presentation are of the highest quality. The stream quality is also phenomenal. To round everything off the matches have been intense and captivating. We will definitely be covering the IPL on upcoming episodes of the GG Rated Liveshow.
2 casters are better than solo casting and they should put in the interviews into the stream. they have all those player interviews and should of done some thing for each day. im not sure why its only the games. makes it feel a lot like just replays and not a tourney.
On April 25 2011 13:37 aneruok wrote: 2 casters are better than solo casting and they should put in the interviews into the stream. they have all those player interviews and should of done some thing for each day. im not sure why its only the games. makes it feel a lot like just replays and not a tourney.
but TB awesome.
We actually broadcast an interview every day! We've shown the TTOne, Sheth and Spades interviews so far on stream!
Our top goals right now are making sure our video player defaults to HD, our VODs are accessible on Youtube and making our VODs easier to navigate by identifying what round each VOD is from! Please continue giving us great feedback to make your user experience better!
On April 26 2011 08:42 Alex.IGN wrote: Our top goals right now are making sure our video player defaults to HD, our VODs are accessible on Youtube and making our VODs easier to navigate by identifying what round each VOD is from! Please continue giving us great feedback to make your user experience better!
boo i hate players that default to hd :S Its just a bit to good for my internet so i always forget to switch to something lower til it freezes. And then i have to change quality and it shoots me back to the beginning of the replay.
edit: anyone else currently getting a dns failure when going to the ipl site?
On April 26 2011 08:42 Alex.IGN wrote: Our top goals right now are making sure our video player defaults to HD, our VODs are accessible on Youtube and making our VODs easier to navigate by identifying what round each VOD is from! Please continue giving us great feedback to make your user experience better!
I'm glad you're putting games on youtube but please don't default to HD. Mobile users dont have an option to switch to SD in the youtube app, only in the browser version.
On April 26 2011 08:42 Alex.IGN wrote: Our top goals right now are making sure our video player defaults to HD, our VODs are accessible on Youtube and making our VODs easier to navigate by identifying what round each VOD is from! Please continue giving us great feedback to make your user experience better!
I'm glad you're putting games on youtube but please don't default to HD. Mobile users dont have an option to switch to SD in the youtube app, only in the browser version.
The youtube won't default to HD, just our VODs serviced through the video page at www.ign.com/ipl