• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 08:54
CEST 14:54
KST 21:54
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 20257Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202577RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18
Community News
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced24BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 2025 #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time I offer completely free coaching services What tournaments are world championships?
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event Esports World Cup 2025 $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced $5,000 WardiTV Summer Championship 2025 WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign Dewalt's Show Matches in China BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers [G] Mineral Boosting Does 1 second matter in StarCraft?
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 718 users

The Close Spawning Position [poll] - Page 6

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 8 28 Next All
5unrise
Profile Joined May 2009
New Zealand646 Posts
March 31 2011 08:48 GMT
#101
On March 31 2011 16:23 THAmarx wrote:
no, don't remove close positions.

why: same as zerg has more problems on close positions terran has more problem on cross positions. And as terran should learn to know how to play cross positions as has zerg to learn how to play close positions.

if zerg maby won't auto fe but go pool first they would have much less trouble to start with.

i don't know how the percentage now is in evening out between cross or close postions.
but if you look statisticly and if the chance to be on every spot is the same the you get double time the close position, that i don't find fair. cross or close should be 50% 50%. I don't know or that is already the chase.


yeah because the "disadvantages" Terrans face on cross positions is anything to compare with the odds faced by a zerg on close positions.. jeezus, get some perspective. Cross positions simply means you actually are getting a decent challenge in a TvZ, which is what it should be.
LloydRays
Profile Joined October 2010
United States306 Posts
March 31 2011 09:11 GMT
#102
no do not remove close spawns.

Yes, the early maps, in particular delta quadrant and lost temple were terran favored for close positions. However, some zergs still do win in close positions. I'm toss, and lost a game against zerg in close positions tonight. I did not play my best, and he managed to keep my forces zealot sentry heavy then transitioned into a big muta push basically killing my econ, I massed what I could and got crushed.

The new modifications to LT (shattered temple) make close positions better, and more exciting since there is jockeying for who gets to take the corner expansions.

It takes some skill but it is possible to expand away from your opponent and gain advantages that way with mobile units.

Bottom line, close positions require different playstyles.
THAmarx
Profile Joined December 2010
65 Posts
March 31 2011 10:28 GMT
#103
On March 31 2011 17:48 5unrise wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 31 2011 16:23 THAmarx wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
no, don't remove close positions.

why: same as zerg has more problems on close positions terran has more problem on cross positions. And as terran should learn to know how to play cross positions as has zerg to learn how to play close positions.

if zerg maby won't auto fe but go pool first they would have much less trouble to start with.

i don't know how the percentage now is in evening out between cross or close postions.
but if you look statisticly and if the chance to be on every spot is the same the you get double time the close position, that i don't find fair. cross or close should be 50% 50%. I don't know or that is already the chase.


yeah because the "disadvantages" Terrans face on cross positions is anything to compare with the odds faced by a zerg on close positions.. jeezus, get some perspective. Cross positions simply means you actually are getting a decent challenge in a TvZ, which is what it should be.


actual they are... terran is as slow and immobile as it gets. while zerg has the fastest units on and of creep. And zerg has the best macro abilities of all the races. That is why terran has to do damage or it's a auto loss.
on cross positions terran can do hellions drops banshee or a big push. But when zerg goes for a couple of mutas banshee and drops are denied (not cost effective anymore).
Then you have to put all in that one big push and if it fails your a goner.
a good zerg denies reinforcement while you crawl to the zerg base and he can easily scout your army so he knows which units he has to produce more to counter. So no room for mistakes here for the terran player.

Your perspective is so zerg only. Just because you can't survive close positions doesn't mean that all odds are against you. Don't cry to much but focus on learning to play better against the matchup. Don't auto think i lost because of close position, but look back and see your errors.
Make some new strategies or adapt your timings. I played enough good zergs who didnt liked close postion but had no problem playing it the same way as i as terran scouts cross position.

when you lose it's always hard to blame it on yourself... that why we have so much ridiculous post here about blizzard and imba's. because it is so simple to just blame something else.
but most of the time it is because of your own faults.

5unrise
Profile Joined May 2009
New Zealand646 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-31 10:45:35
March 31 2011 10:41 GMT
#104
On March 31 2011 19:28 THAmarx wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 31 2011 17:48 5unrise wrote:
On March 31 2011 16:23 THAmarx wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
no, don't remove close positions.

why: same as zerg has more problems on close positions terran has more problem on cross positions. And as terran should learn to know how to play cross positions as has zerg to learn how to play close positions.

if zerg maby won't auto fe but go pool first they would have much less trouble to start with.

i don't know how the percentage now is in evening out between cross or close postions.
but if you look statisticly and if the chance to be on every spot is the same the you get double time the close position, that i don't find fair. cross or close should be 50% 50%. I don't know or that is already the chase.


yeah because the "disadvantages" Terrans face on cross positions is anything to compare with the odds faced by a zerg on close positions.. jeezus, get some perspective. Cross positions simply means you actually are getting a decent challenge in a TvZ, which is what it should be.


actual they are... terran is as slow and immobile as it gets. while zerg has the fastest units on and of creep. And zerg has the best macro abilities of all the races. That is why terran has to do damage or it's a auto loss.
on cross positions terran can do hellions drops banshee or a big push. But when zerg goes for a couple of mutas banshee and drops are denied (not cost effective anymore).
Then you have to put all in that one big push and if it fails your a goner.
a good zerg denies reinforcement while you crawl to the zerg base and he can easily scout your army so he knows which units he has to produce more to counter. So no room for mistakes here for the terran player.

Your perspective is so zerg only. Just because you can't survive close positions doesn't mean that all odds are against you. Don't cry to much but focus on learning to play better against the matchup. Don't auto think i lost because of close position, but look back and see your errors.
Make some new strategies or adapt your timings. I played enough good zergs who didnt liked close postion but had no problem playing it the same way as i as terran scouts cross position.

when you lose it's always hard to blame it on yourself... that why we have so much ridiculous post here about blizzard and imba's. because it is so simple to just blame something else.
but most of the time it is because of your own faults.



umm I never said I don't try to improve, but that has nothing to do with the fact that close spawns is not remotely fair. Why do people liek you like to put words into other people's mouths?

Oh by the way.. a good terran knows when to "crawl" and when to just stim run into a zerg base. If zerg has an army, you crawl, because the macro advantage rests with you if he hasn't droned, if zerg has only mutas, or is about to make units, you stim and run to his door. If you crawl, he will mass his units and getting away with the macro advantage. This knowledge is infinitely helpful to any terran who needs to play a map involving any reasonable distance. If you only know how to 'crawl" all the time, it is yur fault.
THAmarx
Profile Joined December 2010
65 Posts
March 31 2011 11:26 GMT
#105
On March 31 2011 19:41 5unrise wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 31 2011 19:28 THAmarx wrote:
On March 31 2011 17:48 5unrise wrote:
On March 31 2011 16:23 THAmarx wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
no, don't remove close positions.

why: same as zerg has more problems on close positions terran has more problem on cross positions. And as terran should learn to know how to play cross positions as has zerg to learn how to play close positions.

if zerg maby won't auto fe but go pool first they would have much less trouble to start with.

i don't know how the percentage now is in evening out between cross or close postions.
but if you look statisticly and if the chance to be on every spot is the same the you get double time the close position, that i don't find fair. cross or close should be 50% 50%. I don't know or that is already the chase.


yeah because the "disadvantages" Terrans face on cross positions is anything to compare with the odds faced by a zerg on close positions.. jeezus, get some perspective. Cross positions simply means you actually are getting a decent challenge in a TvZ, which is what it should be.


actual they are... terran is as slow and immobile as it gets. while zerg has the fastest units on and of creep. And zerg has the best macro abilities of all the races. That is why terran has to do damage or it's a auto loss.
on cross positions terran can do hellions drops banshee or a big push. But when zerg goes for a couple of mutas banshee and drops are denied (not cost effective anymore).
Then you have to put all in that one big push and if it fails your a goner.
a good zerg denies reinforcement while you crawl to the zerg base and he can easily scout your army so he knows which units he has to produce more to counter. So no room for mistakes here for the terran player.

Your perspective is so zerg only. Just because you can't survive close positions doesn't mean that all odds are against you. Don't cry to much but focus on learning to play better against the matchup. Don't auto think i lost because of close position, but look back and see your errors.
Make some new strategies or adapt your timings. I played enough good zergs who didnt liked close postion but had no problem playing it the same way as i as terran scouts cross position.

when you lose it's always hard to blame it on yourself... that why we have so much ridiculous post here about blizzard and imba's. because it is so simple to just blame something else.
but most of the time it is because of your own faults.



umm I never said I don't try to improve, but that has nothing to do with the fact that close spawns is not remotely fair. Why do people liek you like to put words into other people's mouths?

Oh by the way.. a good terran knows when to "crawl" and when to just stim run into a zerg base. If zerg has an army, you crawl, because the macro advantage rests with you if he hasn't droned, if zerg has only mutas, or is about to make units, you stim and run to his door. If you crawl, he will mass his units and getting away with the macro advantage. This knowledge is infinitely helpful to any terran who needs to play a map involving any reasonable distance. If you only know how to 'crawl" all the time, it is yur fault.


terran units are crawling units... 2.25 for most units and siegetanks are slower and a must for terran. stimming to run at those distances your bio army is in the red and your siegetanks thors are very far behind. the movement of terran always feels like crawling. yes a few stimmed can run faster but you sacrifice alot of health for just getting a little of distance ?
no you as slow as the slowest unit there in the push.

but it's a game of balance... the closer the better for terran the further the better for zerg... that just how these mechanics work. I don't say its auto loss for terran on cross but its just the same as it is for zerg on close.
deathray797
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
196 Posts
March 31 2011 11:31 GMT
#106
then can we remove long distance positions? cuz the disadvantage z gets in close positions is similar if not the same as the disadvantage t or p gets in long positions
Pred8oar
Profile Joined March 2011
Germany281 Posts
March 31 2011 11:40 GMT
#107
Against Zerg the other races do often get kind of a freewin because the Zerg Player has to react to what the other race does so the timezone he got to react gets a lot smaller and preparing for the attack becomes much harder.
nimbim
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany984 Posts
March 31 2011 11:56 GMT
#108
I think the occasional short rush distance is ok and mixes up your ladder experience. I'm a random player and you can also do super effective baneling aggression via those short distances, so I don't think those spawns are a definite disadvantage for Zerg.

The only problem lies with the map pool imho. There are too many maps with super short distances, so even if you downvote 3 maps you will still have short distances a lot. This might also contribute to people being so annoyed with close spawns.
imperator-xy
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
Germany1366 Posts
March 31 2011 11:58 GMT
#109
it doesnt make any sense to remove steppes of war and leave steppes of war-versions of metalopolis and temple in the pool
nathangonmad
Profile Joined September 2010
United Kingdom317 Posts
March 31 2011 12:11 GMT
#110
On March 31 2011 16:23 THAmarx wrote:
no, don't remove close positions.

why: same as zerg has more problems on close positions terran has more problem on cross positions. And as terran should learn to know how to play cross positions as has zerg to learn how to play close positions.

if zerg maby won't auto fe but go pool first they would have much less trouble to start with.

i don't know how the percentage now is in evening out between cross or close postions.
but if you look statisticly and if the chance to be on every spot is the same the you get double time the close position, that i don't find fair. cross or close should be 50% 50%. I don't know or that is already the chase.


In all honestly the problems terran has in cross spots are L2P issues. Whereas zergs problems in close spots are fundamental flaws of gameplay.
Keep trying Leenock
braheem
Profile Joined March 2011
Canada81 Posts
March 31 2011 12:18 GMT
#111
On March 30 2011 08:26 Skillz_Man wrote:
I want to ask, what difference does close or cross positions on shattered temple make in zvp? As a protoss I'll have a close pylon anyways. I'm personally really enjoy close positions so I'm againsts it... I think it's fine - Until you're top top masters a push arriving 5-10 seconds earlier would have killed you either way and it's way overdone.

If you have such a problem, don't play those maps.


Maybe it is because your protoss and you already claim to use proxy pylons, but there is something called a third base.
I hate posses.
Ksyper
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Bulgaria665 Posts
March 31 2011 12:21 GMT
#112
TL;DR
Metal without close positions would be the best map ever.
apalemorning
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Canada509 Posts
March 31 2011 12:23 GMT
#113
On March 31 2011 21:11 nathangonmad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 31 2011 16:23 THAmarx wrote:
no, don't remove close positions.

why: same as zerg has more problems on close positions terran has more problem on cross positions. And as terran should learn to know how to play cross positions as has zerg to learn how to play close positions.

if zerg maby won't auto fe but go pool first they would have much less trouble to start with.

i don't know how the percentage now is in evening out between cross or close postions.
but if you look statisticly and if the chance to be on every spot is the same the you get double time the close position, that i don't find fair. cross or close should be 50% 50%. I don't know or that is already the chase.


In all honestly the problems terran has in cross spots are L2P issues. Whereas zergs problems in close spots are fundamental flaws of gameplay.


was just gonna post that. close positions are just inherently imbalanced especially for zerg because any kind of push is at ur nat in record time, and reinforced instantly. you have to play x15 times better than the other guy to win close positions. you can bet i all-in every time i get a ZvT/ZvP on close positions. i'd rather lose/win in 7 mins than 90% lose a macro game in 15.


example was tonight on the ladder i played a terran on tal darim, and he didnt expo by 7 mins, i scouted with ovie/poked with lings. saw a cheesy 1 base, blueflame/mara/thor/scv all in push, easily stopped it because i had the eco+map length to pump units to easily beat it.

i click find match instantly, i get him again. close positions metal. he does the same exact same thing. knew it was coming. didnt stand a chance. i had half the amount of drones as i did last game, half the time to make units. it really feels like on close positions you can't even make enough drones to fight off any push. if they don't expo by 7 mins, you have to blindly make units to fight off a push, and hope they didnt sneak a cc in their main behind their all in or you're behind.


garbage. just encourages one base/two base timing all in play. the most frustrating thing is, the players beating me on close positions don't even fathom taking a third base because they couldn't keep up with the macro. frustrating.


/whine
immortal/roach is pretty good against stalkers
Dustus
Profile Joined March 2011
United Kingdom86 Posts
March 31 2011 12:26 GMT
#114
I think that the problems people have with close positions is less to do with the early game and more to do with the mid-late game. Expansions are just harder to hold for the zerg as the expand far away. plus any re-enforcements from these Hatches take longer to get to where they need to be. I play toss so not that worryed but I still don't think that games are as good when people spawn too close.
Thrombozyt
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Germany1269 Posts
March 31 2011 12:39 GMT
#115
On March 31 2011 21:11 nathangonmad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 31 2011 16:23 THAmarx wrote:
no, don't remove close positions.

why: same as zerg has more problems on close positions terran has more problem on cross positions. And as terran should learn to know how to play cross positions as has zerg to learn how to play close positions.

if zerg maby won't auto fe but go pool first they would have much less trouble to start with.

i don't know how the percentage now is in evening out between cross or close postions.
but if you look statisticly and if the chance to be on every spot is the same the you get double time the close position, that i don't find fair. cross or close should be 50% 50%. I don't know or that is already the chase.


In all honestly the problems terran has in cross spots are L2P issues. Whereas zergs problems in close spots are fundamental flaws of gameplay.


Wait.. let me guess.. you conclude that, because it's common knowledge that Zerg players have higher inherent skill than Terran players so any problem they face warrants and immediate patch while Terrans are just noobs that abused their race to Master league and are now in trouble as the game gets more balanced?

Damn.. this 'Zerg logic' is getting really old and was already flawed back in beta.
FeyFey
Profile Joined September 2010
Germany10114 Posts
March 31 2011 12:43 GMT
#116
i like spawning close posi as zerg, means i can expand easily at t2 while my opponent can't. But most games are won before t2 even as opponents kill themself with their blind timing pushes. I mean early game zerg on creep is like the other races at a ramp. And still lots of players actually put more then they should into this early game push.

Only thing that is a bit annoying close posi is a tank or immortal timing push. Or a wide open natural, i miss LT was way easier to defend then shattered ^^.

But if those timing pushes fail close posi its over, cross posi its possible to hold the zerg conter, but close posi once you start to think about retreating the game is over.

I mean every race has abilitys allowing to take an expo even if the opponent is keeping you cut off from the map and the zergs one is by far the strongest. And there are enough timing pushes for the zerg as well, so i don't really see an issue with close posis.
But i guess zerg maphack makes it easier to play cross posi games and zergs in general got to lazy to scout with stuff involving ressources, so most players are caught off guard close air or ground.
ALPINA
Profile Joined May 2010
3791 Posts
March 31 2011 12:47 GMT
#117
On March 31 2011 21:39 Thrombozyt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 31 2011 21:11 nathangonmad wrote:
On March 31 2011 16:23 THAmarx wrote:
no, don't remove close positions.

why: same as zerg has more problems on close positions terran has more problem on cross positions. And as terran should learn to know how to play cross positions as has zerg to learn how to play close positions.

if zerg maby won't auto fe but go pool first they would have much less trouble to start with.

i don't know how the percentage now is in evening out between cross or close postions.
but if you look statisticly and if the chance to be on every spot is the same the you get double time the close position, that i don't find fair. cross or close should be 50% 50%. I don't know or that is already the chase.


In all honestly the problems terran has in cross spots are L2P issues. Whereas zergs problems in close spots are fundamental flaws of gameplay.


Wait.. let me guess.. you conclude that, because it's common knowledge that Zerg players have higher inherent skill than Terran players so any problem they face warrants and immediate patch while Terrans are just noobs that abused their race to Master league and are now in trouble as the game gets more balanced?

Damn.. this 'Zerg logic' is getting really old and was already flawed back in beta.


You can watch A LOT of macro games of TvZ when terran wins in straight up macro game where zerg does not make any critical mistakes. And all that in best tournements, so that pretty much says that on huge maps ZvT is pretty fair. And if you watch ZvT on close pos meta or LT you can see that zerg wins when either terran made mistakes or zerg made some kind of all-in.
You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity
TheTenthDoc
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United States9561 Posts
March 31 2011 12:51 GMT
#118
On March 31 2011 21:11 nathangonmad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 31 2011 16:23 THAmarx wrote:
no, don't remove close positions.

why: same as zerg has more problems on close positions terran has more problem on cross positions. And as terran should learn to know how to play cross positions as has zerg to learn how to play close positions.

if zerg maby won't auto fe but go pool first they would have much less trouble to start with.

i don't know how the percentage now is in evening out between cross or close postions.
but if you look statisticly and if the chance to be on every spot is the same the you get double time the close position, that i don't find fair. cross or close should be 50% 50%. I don't know or that is already the chase.


In all honestly the problems terran has in cross spots are L2P issues. Whereas zergs problems in close spots are fundamental flaws of gameplay.


They're really not. Back when T could build rax before depot and P didn't have the zealot build time nerf, they *might* have been, but right now Z is the only race that can begin to threaten the opponent with an army starting pool before overlord. A cross position fast expansion as Zerg cannot be punished if it's played correctly, but if your opponent metagames you and goes early pool your 14 CC/Nexus is not going to stand.
InsaniaK
Profile Joined January 2011
Sweden120 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-31 13:06:54
March 31 2011 13:00 GMT
#119
If close positions were eliminated cross pos should also be eliminated, then we're left with close by air which would make a terrible map.

Seriously, some people has to try to improve-_-'
GLaRe
Profile Joined March 2011
Netherlands13 Posts
March 31 2011 13:10 GMT
#120
I know it mostly zerg worried about spawn positions. But there are other MU's to consider as well. In TvT spawning cross map can be a pain. On Taldrim Altar for instance. It will take forever to kill your opponent. Tank play often takes all the pace out of such a game, and you could easily end up in a game of over an hour. No fun.
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 8 28 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
FEL
09:00
Cracow 2025
Clem vs Krystianer
uThermal vs SKillousLIVE!
Reynor vs MaNa
Lambo vs Gerald
ComeBackTV 1726
RotterdaM1621
IndyStarCraft 419
CranKy Ducklings186
WardiTV179
Rex129
3DClanTV 86
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 1621
IndyStarCraft 419
Rex 129
ProTech68
BRAT_OK 60
MindelVK 19
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 49950
Horang2 8000
Hyuk 1986
EffOrt 1626
Barracks 1086
BeSt 787
Larva 746
Mini 550
firebathero 502
Hyun 455
[ Show more ]
Stork 420
Rush 309
Last 287
Soulkey 231
Shine 82
Sharp 58
Shinee 55
Dewaltoss 48
sorry 46
Movie 42
Sea.KH 42
Free 39
sSak 38
sas.Sziky 36
zelot 21
Icarus 14
yabsab 13
ajuk12(nOOB) 13
Terrorterran 10
Dota 2
qojqva3057
XcaliburYe668
Counter-Strike
sgares303
oskar165
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor302
Other Games
B2W.Neo1805
Beastyqt785
Hui .301
DeMusliM264
Fuzer 163
QueenE40
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH346
• tFFMrPink 19
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 3500
• WagamamaTV905
League of Legends
• Nemesis2539
• Jankos1436
Upcoming Events
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1h 6m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5h 6m
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 21h
WardiTV European League
2 days
Online Event
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Non-Korean Championship
BSL 20 Team Wars
FEL Cracov 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.