• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 14:27
CEST 20:27
KST 03:27
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 20259Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202577RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18
Community News
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced25BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8
StarCraft 2
General
#1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 2025 Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 I offer completely free coaching services What tournaments are world championships?
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event Esports World Cup 2025 $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced $5,000 WardiTV Summer Championship 2025 WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign Dewalt's Show Matches in China BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers [G] Mineral Boosting Does 1 second matter in StarCraft?
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
UK Politics Mega-thread US Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 803 users

Shared bases in team games - Page 5

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
Stiver
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada285 Posts
March 02 2011 13:35 GMT
#81
No option to vote that I enjoy both styles of games.

My and some friends edit maps and remove the shared positions on maps to get the randomized feel to it. I also enjoy playing some RT off race when I'm bored. Both are really fun.
"The most difficult thing in the world is to know how to do a thing and to watch someone else do it wrong without comment."
sushiman
Profile Joined September 2003
Sweden2691 Posts
March 02 2011 15:06 GMT
#82
On March 02 2011 18:48 flodeskum wrote:
The SC2 team game maps in general are a bit of a mess.

Every single 2v2 map (I haven't tried the new ones tbf) is terrible and 2v2 is pretty messed up anyway. There's only one good 3v3 map (uulan deeps) but at least that map is fantastic and fairly common on ladder.

Most of the team maps that are tolerable are 4v4 maps and mostly the shared base ones. For reasons that have already been stated multiple times, the only way to get a team game to go into the late-game is by having shared bases. And team games that get to that stage are usually quite epic.

Then again, maps like Toxic Slums can lead to long games as well, and there's no shared bases on that map. If the layout is good you don't need shared bases to defend all-ins, and still have the option to counterattack. Quicksand is also quite interesting in that aspect - it's ridiculously small, but you can counter and help your allies very quickly. If you could actually go to late game on that map, e.g. if it were larger, it would actually be a decent map without needing shared bases.

It could also be possible to go for a middle route, such as introducing Tempest or similar maps in 4v4, maps where you're close to one of your allies, but the other half of the team is on another part of the map. Some 4v4 maps have something similar, like High Ground, but you're still closer to your allies than enemies. If shared bases is necessary, having the players in clusters of 2 on the opposite sides of the map would spice up games a bit at least.
1000 at least.
intrigue
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Washington, D.C9933 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-02 15:12:46
March 02 2011 15:07 GMT
#83
On March 02 2011 16:45 Liquid`Jinro wrote:
I think all the 2v2+ maps in SC2 are a joke, but I also dont know how you would ever survive being 2on1ed in SC2 with things like warpgates or baneling busts coming so low tech.

my primary concern also. i think increased map size and smaller individual chokes could address this though.

On March 02 2011 17:19 DarthXX wrote:
The problem with the current team maps is a serious lack of expos and just a general tiny-ness. Like all 3v3/4v4 maps have a complete lack of a 3rd base, which is extremely detrimental to certain races (read: Zerg) On almost every single map the 3rd base is a high-yield mineral patch located in the centre of the map, wide open to attack by 3/4 enemy players.

As for myself, I prefer non-shared maps, anyone who played on Twilight Fortress knows just how shit that gets, I think players should be close, but not sharing a base. Or alternatively if they are far away, you can't have a map like Arid Wastes where the bases are too far to reinforce your ally, and you're so far away from your enemies that you can't counter attack. That's what made BGH so awesome, if someone was attacking somewhere, you could hit them right away assuming they were ur neighbour.

That new 4v4 map is a step in the right direction, it's a lot larger and you can actually expo more than once, unfortunately it is still shared base. I think a lot of the problems in team games could be solved by simply increasing the map size. It's incredibly risky to cheese on massive maps, a combined rush from 4 players can be fended off by 2-3 players since reinforcement is so slow, and by the time you run across the map with your initial rush, a minute later, its not nearly as menacing. Right now the maps are so small its possible to sustain a rush with reinforcements running acorss the map, larger map = bigger defender's advantage, as it should be.

yeah! i like the new map a LOT, i think it's easily far better than all the other ones. agree with your conclusions on map size.
here is the map we are talking about, if you have not seen it:
[image loading]
what i like about this map is how large it feels, and the terrain gives you ample room to maneuver well.

On March 02 2011 16:49 Befree wrote:
I may have missed it, but I didn't see anywhere where you gave a conclusion on what you actually want done, but for the purposes of my response I will assume your suggestion is for Blizzard to implement these types of maps into league games (edit: I also make the assumption by shared bases you mean the team is placed on one side of the map that is designed to be for a team, and that you don't specifically mean games where your bases are placed in such a way that two or more players would share a single ramp.)

I disagree. I don't think that having maps that result in "crazy" scenarios for the purpose of fun are a reasonable thing to implement into a competitive ladder system. Ideas like that should be reserved for playing custom games with your friends where you're fooling around.

I imagine in 1v1 we could make maps with large amounts of randomness and positional imbalances that could result in games where players would have to think on the fly and be creative, but such a map isn't fair and it certainly would never be implemented in the 1v1 map pool.

Perhaps you find team games to be on a less serious level and therefore have less serious standards for fairness, but I believe Blizzard as well as many players will continue to view team games as still being competitive rather than on the level of custom games. And as long Blizzard and a portion of the community continue to believe in some level of normalcy and fairness in their team games, I don't think it is okay to implement maps that would heavily take away from that.

I understand the nostalgic roots of your suggestion, craziness certainly did ensue in many BGH's. I can see how this would cause you to believe you'd rather have new maps in the league like this for more fun. But you have to appreciate the need for competitiveness and fairness in a ladder system. BW has many fun maps like BGH, but these maps just cannot be taken seriously in a competitive environment.

When you really look back on many of the maps from BW, it is almost silly how imbalanced and poorly made so many of them were. Fun then? Ya. Fun now? Maybe in the custom games section.

judging from their 1v1 map pool, blizzard certainly does make errors in gauging what kind of maps work and what don't. it can't possibly hurt to introduce some new-styled maps.

people concerned about the "purity" of the ladder [this early in SC2s life] have to keep in mind the blatantly imbalanced maps that were in circulation long before this. do people care more about team-game ladder rank more or having a variety of maps to have a good time on? the fixation on rank and balance shouldn't apply as much to non-1v1 formats.

my point also is that this could raise the skill ceiling, making it more competitive in the long run. as for fairness, spawns on an imbalanced map become less and less important the more players you have. it won't be as bad as 1v1. you could also thumbs down the map before you queue.

also, there is one bgh map in the custom games section. nobody plays it.
Moderatorhttps://soundcloud.com/castlesmusic/sets/oak
Thrombozyt
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Germany1269 Posts
March 02 2011 16:44 GMT
#84
On March 02 2011 12:31 Kyadytim wrote:+ Show Spoiler +

The problem with split base maps is that they actually kills creativity. In Brood War, pro 2v2 died because there was a single strategy for PZ which dominated every possible strategy for every other race combination. Thus, more or less every 2v2 was PZvPZ, with both Zergs opening 9-pool speed into 1-hatch muta with no further drones pumped, while the Protoss both opened 2-gate into 3-gate Dragoon into Templar tech. There were a few TZ teams that tried, but Mutalisks force the Terran to play MM + Vessels, and Templar + Dark Archons shut that down hard. There was one 2v2 map, however, that didn't follow this pattern. Hunters. Hunters was even worse. Whichever team had a player that tried to tech past Zerglings, Zealots, or Marines first, lost.

The principles which caused this problem exist in SC2, as well. Mass speedling yields map control. This prevents players on the other team from moving out without being immediately faced with a 2v1 situation. They can't join armies and fight together. The only unit that can match the threat and mobility of Zerglings is Zerglings of your own. Furthermore, Mutalisks force every player to be able to defend against Mutalisks, unless that team has an equal air force. Their are some units that could match the mobility of the mutalisk (corsair, phoenix), but they don't match the threat, so the Mutalisks were always the aggressive group, which gives them the advantage.

As an addendum, proleague rules didn't allow teams to have both players select Zerg. There were some teams that played Zerg Random in hopes of getting two Zergs, because two Zerg far and away dominated 2v2, for the principles described above.
In general, these principles apply to 3v3 and 4v4 as well. A team with 1 Zerg will almost always have that Zerg killed by early aggression of 2 Zergs on the other team, and from there, that team is down a player and down map control, and the non-zerg on the team that has map control can essentially have opened Nexus or CC first (in fact, in BW 2v2, PZ against TT, if the Zerg opened 9-pool speed, the Protoss could open Nexus first and then tech right to Dragoons, because of the map control provided by the mass speedling), or tech rapidly to something which will crush players forced to play against mass ling, such as cloaked Banshees, DTs, or Colossi. This works because every player on the team with less Zerg players is forced to have enough units to defend against Speedlings, while the players on the team with more Zergs can often cut units for econ or tech.

Shared bases alleviates more or less all of these problems, allowing a variety of strategies to be effective, and making the game more about player skill and decision making than ability to execute the one superior strategy.

TL;DR
Shared base maps allow for more varied play because of the mechanics of pressure and map control.

Also, the poll sucks. There's no option for non-shared base maps are worse than shared base maps.


He is spot on. I am playing 2on2 competitively (topping out at rank 7 on sc2rank.com global diamond) as a ZT team. With the recent change in the map pool, the number of maps with shared bases is lowered significantly (I think 2 are remaining). This leads to a situation, that we see the map and a PZ opponent and we know we will lose. Split base and speed ling inbase zealot warp-in will kill you every time. Even if you mass marines and speedlings as a counter, you lose. Terran cannot defend the ramp against speedlings and the back of the base from a 5 zealot warpin except by coiling up and making bunkers at the mineral line and that leaves your teammate 1on2 with speedlings vs spling/lot combo. Also stalker/bling/sling combo is incredibly hard to hold without a shared choke. So we are currently trying out wierd shit in the hope that we might get the counter to the proxy pylon + overlord strat on split bases, but I'm afraid that's barely possible.

Shared bases (e.g. Tempest) allow for multiple options such as tech (e.g. fast muta feed), quicker expansion or aggression. Split bases neccesitates early aggression, because early 1 army is inferior to 2 armies. Less options = less interesting game.

I agree, that for a chaos and mayhem fun games (=custom games) BGH is better than shared base matches, I believe that for competitive team games (= ladder games) shared bases are better.

Also note, that you never mentioned 2on2 on BGH type maps, but only 3on3 and 4on4.
aeoliant
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Canada361 Posts
March 02 2011 16:55 GMT
#85
i forgot how awesome BGH games were the strategies at the beginning of the game completely depended on where you spawned (ie if an enemy spawned between me and my teammate we could just 6 pool him and then take his base)
MichaelJLowell
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
United States610 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-02 21:15:50
March 02 2011 21:00 GMT
#86
On March 03 2011 00:07 intrigue wrote:

my point also is that this could raise the skill ceiling, making it more competitive in the long run. as for fairness, spawns on an imbalanced map become less and less important the more players you have. it won't be as bad as 1v1. you could also thumbs down the map before you queue.

That's like saying a poorly-designed game will become more competitive in the long run than a well-balanced game because players will have to struggle harder to deal with its limitations.

*cue Brood War comparisons*
http://www.learntocounter.com - I'm a "known troll" so please disconnect your kid's computer when I am on the forums.
Zelniq
Profile Blog Joined August 2005
United States7166 Posts
March 02 2011 23:55 GMT
#87
shared bases is a major reason why i avoid team games, it's just not as fun/interesting/thought-provoking as non-shared base games. the extreme example is a map like twilight fortress, games there are so boring
ModeratorBlame yourself or God
Neo.NEt
Profile Joined August 2010
United States785 Posts
March 03 2011 00:15 GMT
#88
If the bases aren't shared and both of the other guys 7 pool the same person that guy just dies. If it's Twilight Fortress... you have a fighting chance. Pretty much seems like whoever attacks first wins if the bases aren't shared.. am I wrong here?
Apologize.
Sein
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States1811 Posts
March 03 2011 01:58 GMT
#89
On March 03 2011 09:15 Neo.NEt wrote:
If the bases aren't shared and both of the other guys 7 pool the same person that guy just dies. If it's Twilight Fortress... you have a fighting chance. Pretty much seems like whoever attacks first wins if the bases aren't shared.. am I wrong here?


Sac your ally and try to take them on before they have enough time to recover their economy from doing 7pool. I believe Day9 has a daily about this. Non-shared base maps honestly aren't a 7pool fest a lot of people here seem to be worrying about. It does turn out to be a Tier 1 unit fest most of the time though, but it's fun to play those every once in a while rather than the turtle-up-and-advance-with-deathball type of game that occurs pretty often in shared base maps. What's wrong with having to play different styles in 2v2 games especially as a pretty good number of people do really like non-shared base maps?

I also have another suggestion. How about those island maps like Snowbound? It'd be fun to mix in just one island map into the map pool and see how it turns out.
intrigue
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Washington, D.C9933 Posts
March 03 2011 02:23 GMT
#90
On March 03 2011 06:00 MichaelJLowell wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 03 2011 00:07 intrigue wrote:

my point also is that this could raise the skill ceiling, making it more competitive in the long run. as for fairness, spawns on an imbalanced map become less and less important the more players you have. it won't be as bad as 1v1. you could also thumbs down the map before you queue.

That's like saying a poorly-designed game will become more competitive in the long run than a well-balanced game because players will have to struggle harder to deal with its limitations.

*cue Brood War comparisons*

no, i am saying a map that gives rise to more complex situations will raise the skill level. i don't see how that is similar at all.
Moderatorhttps://soundcloud.com/castlesmusic/sets/oak
sluggaslamoo
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
Australia4494 Posts
March 03 2011 02:27 GMT
#91
On March 02 2011 12:20 Whitewing wrote:
BGH wasn't on a ladder system.


It was in ICCUP.
Come play Android Netrunner - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=409008
Sein
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States1811 Posts
March 03 2011 05:31 GMT
#92
"Team play maps where your base is too far from your ally tend to favor race compositions that can use mobile armies. This is the reason why we will avoid having maps like Arid Wastes in the team play ladder in the future."

This is Blizzard's official stance. I'm really going to miss those non-stop high aggression games..
bkrow
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Australia8532 Posts
March 03 2011 05:57 GMT
#93
Blizzard just removed Arid Wastes.. a split base 2v2 map which always ended in one side all-inning the back rocks and wiping out 1 player before anything could be done about it.. I have nothing against split-team maps but they need to get the design right..
In The Rear With The Gear .. *giggle* /////////// cobra-LA-LA-LA-LA-LA!!!!
oxxo
Profile Joined February 2010
988 Posts
March 03 2011 05:58 GMT
#94
On March 03 2011 14:31 Sein wrote:
"Team play maps where your base is too far from your ally tend to favor race compositions that can use mobile armies. This is the reason why we will avoid having maps like Arid Wastes in the team play ladder in the future."

This is Blizzard's official stance. I'm really going to miss those non-stop high aggression games..


That's good. Z + makes it impossible to win unless you also have a Z.
Thrombozyt
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Germany1269 Posts
March 03 2011 08:53 GMT
#95
On March 03 2011 14:31 Sein wrote:
"Team play maps where your base is too far from your ally tend to favor race compositions that can use mobile armies. This is the reason why we will avoid having maps like Arid Wastes in the team play ladder in the future."

This is Blizzard's official stance. I'm really going to miss those non-stop high aggression games..


That's ironic, as the latest change in the map pool increased the number of split base maps and drastically reduced the number of shared base maps.
manicshock
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada741 Posts
March 03 2011 16:13 GMT
#96
I think shared bases are interesting as they allow for more dynamic builds. For example, it's possible for me to open tank marine with my ally going fast chargelots. Split bases it's basically whoever dies first leaves the other guy to win the game (against cheese).
Never argue with an idiot. They will just drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
Kralic
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Canada2628 Posts
March 03 2011 16:23 GMT
#97
I like to play team games, and with the shared bases it makes for games where no one really moves out until they hit the critical mass of unit x they decided to mass up on. I felt with the maps where you had seperate bases it made for more interesting games. If you partner gets all in'd and you played standard you can still win the game 1v2 because you are set up for the longer game and should have a larger army if your partner died slowly.

We will have to see what they do in the future, they could have made the map pool like this to get people used to team games.

Or have it so Arranged teams play against arranged teams with a map pool conisting of less shared bases and more open maps. Kulas Ravine was my favourite 2v2 map in the Beta.

Random (solo) 2v2 queuers can get a similar map pool but more heavy on shared bases and only play against other solo queuers.

Have to wait and see what happens in the future.
Brood War forever!
MichaelJLowell
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
United States610 Posts
March 03 2011 16:37 GMT
#98
On March 03 2011 11:23 intrigue wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 03 2011 06:00 MichaelJLowell wrote:
On March 03 2011 00:07 intrigue wrote:

my point also is that this could raise the skill ceiling, making it more competitive in the long run. as for fairness, spawns on an imbalanced map become less and less important the more players you have. it won't be as bad as 1v1. you could also thumbs down the map before you queue.

That's like saying a poorly-designed game will become more competitive in the long run than a well-balanced game because players will have to struggle harder to deal with its limitations.

*cue Brood War comparisons*

no, i am saying a map that gives rise to more complex situations will raise the skill level. i don't see how that is similar at all.

You're assuming that the way units operate in Starcraft is balanced for team games. They are not. And as long as one race has a significant advantage in early-game mobility (as Zerg does), there needs to be a way for players to assist their teammates without risk. As far as I can tell, you're making the assumption that irregular starting points (with their own imbalances) will make for a more complicated map because the rotation of starting points from game-to-game will make sure teams will have to adapt on a game-to-game basis. But until Blizzard rectifies the issue of early-game all-ins and early-game Speedlings, that can't happen.
http://www.learntocounter.com - I'm a "known troll" so please disconnect your kid's computer when I am on the forums.
MasterOfChaos
Profile Blog Joined April 2007
Germany2896 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-03 18:56:21
March 03 2011 18:55 GMT
#99
On March 04 2011 01:37 MichaelJLowell wrote:
You're assuming that the way units operate in Starcraft is balanced for team games.

Up until high foreigner level team games work pretty well in Starcraft, perhaps a not so well at pro level, but that might be related to map pool issues too.
In particular high ground advantage with small chokes makes holding a 2on1 possible for long enough to have the ally support or counter.
In Starcraft 2 that might be different.

LiquipediaOne eye to kill. Two eyes to live.
TimeSpiral
Profile Joined January 2011
United States1010 Posts
March 07 2011 20:17 GMT
#100
Variety is good, but too far in either direction is bad.
=========================================


Team games are good fun, but it does seem impossible sometimes. Split rock maps, that also include destructible rocks create a near guaranteed kill with certain unit combos.

Some of the game design features create scenarios that are virtually impossible to deal with. For instance, the ling+zealot double rush. There is just not enough mobility and DPS to deal with that.

Random Idea
==============

Since the game is primarily designed/balanced around competitive 1v1, but Blizzard still ranks team games and LOTS of people play them, maybe they should expand the unit availability for each race just for team games. This could help in reducing the amount of "perfect strats."

Might be a terrible, terrible idea, but maybe not. One thing is for sure, they MUST reconsider destructable rocks in split-base maps. It is impossible to defend some all-ins.
[G] Positioning, Formations, and Tactics: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=187892
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
18:00
RO8 Round Robin Group - Day 4
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
ZZZero.O112
LiquipediaDiscussion
FEL
09:00
Cracow 2025
Clem vs TBD
Reynor vs TBD
RotterdaM2629
ComeBackTV 2139
IndyStarCraft 635
WardiTV537
CranKy Ducklings222
3DClanTV 150
EnkiAlexander 149
Rex129
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 2629
IndyStarCraft 635
Rex 129
Vindicta 47
MindelVK 18
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 30032
Shine 308
firebathero 261
BeSt 174
Soulkey 132
ZZZero.O 112
Dewaltoss 90
Hyun 66
yabsab 36
Free 25
[ Show more ]
Terrorterran 8
Dota 2
Gorgc6508
qojqva3882
Counter-Strike
fl0m3847
flusha195
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox1634
Mew2King524
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor673
Liquid`Hasu431
Other Games
B2W.Neo841
Hui .198
KnowMe136
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2318
StarCraft 2
angryscii 0
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 47
• Legendk 7
• iHatsuTV 7
• Kozan
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Migwel
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki7
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• Nemesis2371
• WagamamaTV747
Other Games
• imaqtpie1014
• Shiphtur226
Upcoming Events
Wardi Open
16h 33m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 15h
WardiTV European League
1d 21h
Online Event
1d 23h
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Non-Korean Championship
BSL 20 Team Wars
FEL Cracov 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.