• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 01:40
CEST 07:40
KST 14:40
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week4[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles6[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China10Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL70
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings We need to be discussing a new patch right now! Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation RSL Season 1 - Final Week
Tourneys
$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone ASL20 Preliminary Maps BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Script to open stream directly using middle click
Tourneys
Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Last Minute Live-Report Thread Resource! [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread The PlayStation 5 Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Accidental Video Game Porn Archive Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 529 users

Lack of attacking ability for zerg - Page 10

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 8 9 10 11 Next All
Numy
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
South Africa35471 Posts
December 27 2010 11:01 GMT
#181
On December 27 2010 19:45 Zacsafus wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2010 18:52 IdrA wrote:
On December 27 2010 17:47 Saracen wrote:
Zerg has plenty of "attacking" ability. Who cares if lings aren't able to bust a wall? If you have enough lings left over after an engagement from destroying a Protoss or Terran early/midgame attack, you've probably already won. If you're Protoss or Terran and you move out and happen to have too few units against Zerg, you can't retreat. You just lose all your units and then lose the game because Zerg can make 20-30 drones as you're replenishing your army to match his.

if you have enough lings left over after an engagement early it means you lost cuz you have less drones than you could and the lings are now useless anyway.


Having lings left over doesnt mean that you have lost, i just means u are at perfect macro mode, but for people who arent aiming for complete perfection a few lings left over is better than not enough lings in the first place.

Also having units left over gives zerg a unique timing window in which they can swarm and apply pressure to the slow reinforcing protoss and terrans. If zerg wins a big fight is almost garaunteed that they can cause some damage to the opponent, its not as if terrans only attack with half their army and then leave some siege tanks at home just in case.

Yes, these attacks are far more game winning in the late game but the potential is there in the early game too, because your production isnt quite up to scratch but neither is the terrans or protoss', it is definately crushing to lose a game from a zerg who gets some lings in your base and picks off reinforcing marines and tanks one by one as they prop from the buildings. Its not like zerg who instantly surround your units if you happen to be near a hatch when all the units pop.

Also having lings left over means u dont need to make quite so many to defend the next attack, meaning that you can make more drones! So its not quite as bad as you make out having some units on the field before they are sent to fight.


You missed his point completely. He's basically saying if you have lings left over you produced too many lings too early and thus hurt your economy so you might not be able to produce enough fighting units for the next attack because you produced too many too early.

As a Zerg early game you want to try survive everything with as little commitment as possible. Having an over-commitment is terrible for you and hurts.
Askesis
Profile Joined September 2010
216 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-27 11:42:19
December 27 2010 11:38 GMT
#182
It's not that Zerg can't early pressure, it's that Zerg elect to take their almost-guaranteed super-early expansion.

No, Zerg can't early pressure AND take their almost-guaranteed super-early expansion. Sorry about that.
Zacsafus
Profile Joined May 2010
England255 Posts
December 27 2010 12:10 GMT
#183
On December 27 2010 20:01 Numy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2010 19:45 Zacsafus wrote:
On December 27 2010 18:52 IdrA wrote:
On December 27 2010 17:47 Saracen wrote:
Zerg has plenty of "attacking" ability. Who cares if lings aren't able to bust a wall? If you have enough lings left over after an engagement from destroying a Protoss or Terran early/midgame attack, you've probably already won. If you're Protoss or Terran and you move out and happen to have too few units against Zerg, you can't retreat. You just lose all your units and then lose the game because Zerg can make 20-30 drones as you're replenishing your army to match his.

if you have enough lings left over after an engagement early it means you lost cuz you have less drones than you could and the lings are now useless anyway.


Having lings left over doesnt mean that you have lost, i just means u are at perfect macro mode, but for people who arent aiming for complete perfection a few lings left over is better than not enough lings in the first place.

Also having units left over gives zerg a unique timing window in which they can swarm and apply pressure to the slow reinforcing protoss and terrans. If zerg wins a big fight is almost garaunteed that they can cause some damage to the opponent, its not as if terrans only attack with half their army and then leave some siege tanks at home just in case.

Yes, these attacks are far more game winning in the late game but the potential is there in the early game too, because your production isnt quite up to scratch but neither is the terrans or protoss', it is definately crushing to lose a game from a zerg who gets some lings in your base and picks off reinforcing marines and tanks one by one as they prop from the buildings. Its not like zerg who instantly surround your units if you happen to be near a hatch when all the units pop.

Also having lings left over means u dont need to make quite so many to defend the next attack, meaning that you can make more drones! So its not quite as bad as you make out having some units on the field before they are sent to fight.


You missed his point completely. He's basically saying if you have lings left over you produced too many lings too early and thus hurt your economy so you might not be able to produce enough fighting units for the next attack because you produced too many too early.

As a Zerg early game you want to try survive everything with as little commitment as possible. Having an over-commitment is terrible for you and hurts.


I didnt miss his point, sorry if it came over that way, what i am saying is that he is exaggerating a ton, its not gg if you have some lings left over. Don't forget the terran had to spend money to make his units too, and if you crush him with units left over and he didnt do much damage, then you have essentially gained a timing window in which to attack him, this is on top of the economic damage it cost him to make the units and have his push fail.

Yes it is true that zerg cant just put on pressure by busting a ramp, much like protoss or terran can, (well bling busts work on occassion and its usually gg if they arent prepared, just like zerg is sometimes underprepared) but they have a unique timing in which they can punish the way in which terran more so than protoss reinforce, if you dont have enough units to hold off a wave of zerg units, you will never be able to cope with the pressure a zerg can put on with consecutive waves.

Essentially wall-ins are the only way protoss and terran arent dominated by zergs reinforcement mechanics, they dont wall in because it gives them an advantage, you wall in because its neccessary, but even wall ins arent infallable. You dont see terran and protoss walling against T or P because it isnt neccessary and its more of an advantage to have your ramp free for traversing when you know there isnt a chance of dying from an attack right away.

If terran and protoss couldnt wall off zerg would be able to win easily by just sending wave after wave at them in the early game, wall ins help mitigate this pressure, but trust me terrans and protoss feel super uneasy at expanding to an open natural like xel'naga's. Its not just zerg who feels hot under the collar about attacks you cant see coming.
Barca
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States418 Posts
December 27 2010 13:14 GMT
#184
I think the reason Zergs aren't applying pressure early on is because they can't make fighting units and drones at the same time. Larvae is a resource, and a scarce one in the early game.

You see the 5 roach rush? You cut drones at like 15 because at some point you have to stop making drones in order to make something else.
- I hate threads that end with "Thoughts?" -
DarkRise
Profile Joined November 2010
1644 Posts
December 27 2010 13:21 GMT
#185
not true
watch a few korean zergs replay or pro games casted by someone
Rflcrx
Profile Joined October 2010
503 Posts
December 27 2010 13:49 GMT
#186
I agree with the OP, but I think the problem could be best solved with better balanced maps with bigger ramps. If it is harder/take longer to wall-in the enemy cannot apply pressure without danger. Attacking should always bring some risks. So you either walloff good and fast, or you don't, but if your attack fails you are vulnerable. But thats just something blizzard can do, in the meantime Z have to refine defensive play and to develop metagame to become more resistant against any kind of cheese/pressure. While there is a principal end to this learning (for instance the FE is the best build vs. foxer style aggression and macrowise cannot be improved), I don't think the zerg have already arrived at that point.
Tachion
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Canada8573 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-27 13:54:44
December 27 2010 13:54 GMT
#187
I'm not sure why I'm posting this, 100 people have already but I just want to reinforce the idea that...

If a Terran or Protoss decide to go on the offensive in the early/early mid-game, and manage to trade army for army(resource costs included), they can come out of it pretty damn even. If a Zerg goes on the offensive and trades army for army, it puts him behind since he could have droned up and defended at a later point and come out of that exchange with a bigger economy.

I would go so far as to equate it to pullling scv's to use in your attack, and if you don't do any economic damage then you're just going to be farther behind in the worker count. There is a greater necessity to do economic damage to your opponent when playing offensively, and thus a greater risk compared to the other races.
i was driving down the road this november eve and spotted a hitchhiker walking down the street. i pulled over and saw that it was only a tree. i uprooted it and put it in my trunk. do trees like marshmallow peeps? cause that's all i have and will have.
ChickenLips
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
2912 Posts
December 27 2010 14:07 GMT
#188
On December 27 2010 22:54 Tachion wrote:
I'm not sure why I'm posting this, 100 people have already but I just want to reinforce the idea that...

If a Terran or Protoss decide to go on the offensive in the early/early mid-game, and manage to trade army for army(resource costs included), they can come out of it pretty damn even. If a Zerg goes on the offensive and trades army for army, it puts him behind since he could have droned up and defended at a later point and come out of that exchange with a bigger economy.

I would go so far as to equate it to pullling scv's to use in your attack, and if you don't do any economic damage then you're just going to be farther behind in the worker count. There is a greater necessity to do economic damage to your opponent when playing offensively, and thus a greater risk compared to the other races.


That's actually a pretty flawed comparison

If you can trade your army for his army containing sentries/tanks by all means go for it, providing you have an economy behind it. If it was always possible for Zerg to trade army for army Zerg would win about 95% of games. If you could only kill those sentries before they come at you with 200/200 ;_;
❤Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ✿
MoreFaSho
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States1427 Posts
December 27 2010 14:17 GMT
#189
Having a kill move is definitely easier (and more noob friendly) than having to use your advantage the take more expansions and win later. Assuming it is the right time to make a kill move, you win the game and don't leave any room to mess up later, I think the style that's hard for a lot of zerg players is that when they get what should be a winning advantage, the game still has to go on for 10-15 more minutes pretty often, that's a lot of room for mistakes. For other races vs Z it's quite often that when they get a winning advantage they can execute a kill move in 5 minutes because zerg has a relatively weak defenders advantage (basically only re-enforcements).
I always try to shield slam face, just to make sure it doesnt work
salazar001
Profile Joined December 2010
United States38 Posts
December 27 2010 14:22 GMT
#190
On December 24 2010 10:57 Red. wrote:

as for protoss yeah, no clue. Plus the overlord scouting its completely stupid, gets destroyed by 2 marines. meanwhile protoss have observers and terran has scans (but terran wants mules blah blah blah terran needs the mules blah, they still use it so many times).

I think something has to change soon.


Its been like that since BW. I don't see the problem in scouting abilities.
GreEny K
Profile Joined February 2008
Germany7312 Posts
December 27 2010 14:23 GMT
#191
On December 27 2010 22:21 DarkRise wrote:
not true
watch a few korean zergs replay or pro games casted by someone


What's not true? Care to elaborate on this post a bit?
Why would you ever choose failure, when success is an option.
Barca
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States418 Posts
December 27 2010 14:50 GMT
#192
On December 27 2010 23:22 salazar001 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 24 2010 10:57 Red. wrote:

as for protoss yeah, no clue. Plus the overlord scouting its completely stupid, gets destroyed by 2 marines. meanwhile protoss have observers and terran has scans (but terran wants mules blah blah blah terran needs the mules blah, they still use it so many times).

I think something has to change soon.


Its been like that since BW. I don't see the problem in scouting abilities.


Agreed. With overlord speed you basically have the opportunity to scout whenever the hell you want to. Plus speedlings to poke front... I really feel any Zerg saying they lack scouting ability is not playing Zerg correctly.

For instance, if you see your overlord scout dying to 2 marines (and you only see those 2 marines), then expect tech or an expansion. Might want to prepare for banshees but scout his natural, and so you are prepared for both. Wow I just revolutionized your ZvT, you can thank me later.

Keep in mind that observers come out late, and even later if you didn't open robo. But because of the sure lack of scouting and the possibility of cloaked units, I guess Protoss has to mostly open robo...
- I hate threads that end with "Thoughts?" -
Rflcrx
Profile Joined October 2010
503 Posts
December 27 2010 14:54 GMT
#193
On December 27 2010 23:50 Barca wrote:
For instance, if you see your overlord scout dying to 2 marines (and you only see those 2 marines), then expect tech or an expansion. Might want to prepare for banshees but scout his natural, and so you are prepared for both. Wow I just revolutionized your ZvT, you can thank me later.


This might work in bronce league, but anybody above bronce league won't use more than 2 marines, as there is no need to. So seeing an overlord dying to 2 marines means absolutely nothing, it could be tech, it could be an expansion, it could also mean he has a huge marineforce in his base, waiting for stim to finish. Basically the overlord scouted 2 marines, which is..not that helpful at all. I see no reason to thank you, as you haven't really revolutionized anything beyond the bronce league.
Tachion
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Canada8573 Posts
December 27 2010 14:54 GMT
#194
On December 27 2010 23:07 ChickenLips wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2010 22:54 Tachion wrote:
I'm not sure why I'm posting this, 100 people have already but I just want to reinforce the idea that...

If a Terran or Protoss decide to go on the offensive in the early/early mid-game, and manage to trade army for army(resource costs included), they can come out of it pretty damn even. If a Zerg goes on the offensive and trades army for army, it puts him behind since he could have droned up and defended at a later point and come out of that exchange with a bigger economy.

I would go so far as to equate it to pullling scv's to use in your attack, and if you don't do any economic damage then you're just going to be farther behind in the worker count. There is a greater necessity to do economic damage to your opponent when playing offensively, and thus a greater risk compared to the other races.


That's actually a pretty flawed comparison

If you can trade your army for his army containing sentries/tanks by all means go for it, providing you have an economy behind it. If it was always possible for Zerg to trade army for army Zerg would win about 95% of games. If you could only kill those sentries before they come at you with 200/200 ;_;

That's just the thing though, until you get into the mid-game, you are playing catchup with your econ the entire time. If you hinder that even more then your opponent will have a superior econ and just roll you later on in the game, sentries or not.
i was driving down the road this november eve and spotted a hitchhiker walking down the street. i pulled over and saw that it was only a tree. i uprooted it and put it in my trunk. do trees like marshmallow peeps? cause that's all i have and will have.
osten
Profile Joined March 2008
Sweden316 Posts
December 27 2010 15:09 GMT
#195
Ok fair, I won't discuss balance but you sure did. Your ending statement stating it has oh absolutely nothing to do with balance was cute.

Yes zerg has no way of killing someone who knows what they are doing before tier 2.

End.
terranghost
Profile Joined May 2010
United States980 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-27 15:31:45
December 27 2010 15:19 GMT
#196
On December 27 2010 23:54 Rflcrx wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2010 23:50 Barca wrote:
For instance, if you see your overlord scout dying to 2 marines (and you only see those 2 marines), then expect tech or an expansion. Might want to prepare for banshees but scout his natural, and so you are prepared for both. Wow I just revolutionized your ZvT, you can thank me later.


This might work in bronce league, but anybody above bronce league won't use more than 2 marines, as there is no need to. So seeing an overlord dying to 2 marines means absolutely nothing, it could be tech, it could be an expansion, it could also mean he has a huge marineforce in his base, waiting for stim to finish. Basically the overlord scouted 2 marines, which is..not that helpful at all. I see no reason to thank you, as you haven't really revolutionized anything beyond the bronce league.


Assuming the overlord is being attacked by only 2 marines your overlord will make it to about midway through the base. If one doesn't work for you that's fine then use 2. The only scout cheaper than that (at the moment) assuming every 1 gas counting as 2 minerals would be the scouting rax as a scan sacrifices a mule.
Sure terrans might opt to scan you without hesitation but this does prevent them from building as many units. And even if the toss/terran hide their force you will at least see their production facilities. Also there is usually very little a scouting scv or later scouting scv won't notice if they are not on lair tech yet. Until lair tech is achieved the zerg have very limited places of building buildings efficiently.
"It is amazing that people who think we cannot afford to pay for doctors, hospitals, and medication somehow think that we can afford to pay for doctors, hospitals, medication and a government bureaucracy to administer it." - Thomas Sowell
Rflcrx
Profile Joined October 2010
503 Posts
December 27 2010 15:32 GMT
#197
On December 28 2010 00:19 terranghost wrote:
Assuming the overlord is being attacked by only 2 marines your overlord will make it to about midway through the base.


No.

On December 28 2010 00:19 terranghost wrote:
If one doesn't work for you that's fine then use 2.


200 minerals and 2 larvae to know he has 4 marines? Not worth it.

On December 28 2010 00:19 terranghost wrote:
The only scout cheaper than that


Again: For anybody above bronce league that is no scouting at all.
Oleksandr
Profile Joined July 2010
United States227 Posts
December 27 2010 18:58 GMT
#198
On December 27 2010 19:45 Zacsafus wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2010 18:52 IdrA wrote:
On December 27 2010 17:47 Saracen wrote:
Zerg has plenty of "attacking" ability. Who cares if lings aren't able to bust a wall? If you have enough lings left over after an engagement from destroying a Protoss or Terran early/midgame attack, you've probably already won. If you're Protoss or Terran and you move out and happen to have too few units against Zerg, you can't retreat. You just lose all your units and then lose the game because Zerg can make 20-30 drones as you're replenishing your army to match his.

if you have enough lings left over after an engagement early it means you lost cuz you have less drones than you could and the lings are now useless anyway.


Having lings left over doesnt mean that you have lost, i just means u are at perfect macro mode, but for people who arent aiming for complete perfection a few lings left over is better than not enough lings in the first place.


Tell that to Blizz balancing team who created SC2 Zerg. Against most all-in builds you do need to be perfect. GG
Idra: good sir, you appear to be somewhat lacking in intelligence. please refrain from posting until this is remedied, since it renders your opinions slightly less than correct and has a tendency to irritate more informed forum-goers.
Oleksandr
Profile Joined July 2010
United States227 Posts
December 27 2010 19:05 GMT
#199
On December 28 2010 00:32 Rflcrx wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 28 2010 00:19 terranghost wrote:
Assuming the overlord is being attacked by only 2 marines your overlord will make it to about midway through the base.


No.

Show nested quote +
On December 28 2010 00:19 terranghost wrote:
If one doesn't work for you that's fine then use 2.


200 minerals and 2 larvae to know he has 4 marines? Not worth it.

Show nested quote +
On December 28 2010 00:19 terranghost wrote:
The only scout cheaper than that


Again: For anybody above bronce league that is no scouting at all.


+1


User was warned for this post
Idra: good sir, you appear to be somewhat lacking in intelligence. please refrain from posting until this is remedied, since it renders your opinions slightly less than correct and has a tendency to irritate more informed forum-goers.
Saracen
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
United States5139 Posts
December 27 2010 19:32 GMT
#200
On December 27 2010 22:54 Tachion wrote:
I'm not sure why I'm posting this, 100 people have already but I just want to reinforce the idea that...

If a Terran or Protoss decide to go on the offensive in the early/early mid-game, and manage to trade army for army(resource costs included), they can come out of it pretty damn even. If a Zerg goes on the offensive and trades army for army, it puts him behind since he could have droned up and defended at a later point and come out of that exchange with a bigger economy.

I would go so far as to equate it to pullling scv's to use in your attack, and if you don't do any economic damage then you're just going to be farther behind in the worker count. There is a greater necessity to do economic damage to your opponent when playing offensively, and thus a greater risk compared to the other races.

Wrong. At the beginning of the game, you drone your ass off. Why? Because your opponent has no units - he can't do any damage. Then, he starts getting his ball. You're forced to make units.
Let's say he's on 1 base. You cut drones at a particular point in time to stop his attack. You trade armies. You have 2 base to his 1. Can he expand? No, because even though he has plenty of workers, he's on 1 base. Your income is still higher, and you can reinforce faster. Even if he does manage to expand, you can build 2 rounds of drones, and you've won the game because he can't apply pressure.
Let's say you're both on 2 base. You trade armies. Now what? He can't pressure you because he has no army. You can make a round or two of drones. Now you're far ahead in economy, and you're soon to be ahead in army as well.
The problem is either you're regurgitating common beliefs, or you just don't know when to drone. It's not to say that you're wrong that you'll get more economy by making drones instead of units. It's just flawed to think that trading armies as Zerg is a bad thing. Also, sometimes you can't always "defend at a later point" because Zerg is a very positional race. For example, on Shakuras Plateau, if you wait for a Protoss to get all the way up to your natural before you start defending with roach/ling/crawler, you've pretty much lost.
Prev 1 8 9 10 11 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 4h 20m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 227
StarCraft: Brood War
Leta 796
Zeus 568
PianO 351
HiyA 266
Nal_rA 93
sorry 83
NaDa 62
GoRush 61
JulyZerg 53
Aegong 41
[ Show more ]
Noble 34
Rock 11
ivOry 6
LuMiX 4
Dota 2
monkeys_forever767
NeuroSwarm129
League of Legends
JimRising 829
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1438
Super Smash Bros
Westballz36
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor154
Other Games
summit1g11142
shahzam1005
ViBE201
Trikslyr32
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick39371
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH359
• Hupsaiya 64
• practicex 29
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
4h 20m
SHIN vs Clem
Cure vs TBD
FEL
6h 20m
FEL
10h 20m
Gerald vs PAPI
Spirit vs ArT
CSO Cup
10h 20m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
12h 20m
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
DaveTesta Events
12h 20m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 4h
RSL Revival
1d 4h
Classic vs TBD
FEL
1d 9h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 12h
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
[ Show More ]
Wardi Open
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
WardiTV European League
3 days
PiGosaur Monday
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Epic.LAN
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
HSC XXVII
NC Random Cup

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters

Upcoming

CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.