• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 14:46
CEST 20:46
KST 03:46
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202560RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
The StarCraft 2 GOAT - An in-depth analysis The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 What tournaments are world championships? RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
[Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion Dewalt's Show Matches in China Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? [G] Mineral Boosting Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Post Pic of your Favorite Food!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1098 users

Morrow and Sjow Matchfixing? - Page 7

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 49 Next All
SweetNJoshSauce
Profile Joined July 2010
United States468 Posts
December 22 2010 06:53 GMT
#121
It is pretty lame, but the original post made it sound so much worse if what Sjow said is true
MarCoon
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Germany493 Posts
December 22 2010 06:53 GMT
#122
On December 22 2010 15:47 Subversion wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 22 2010 15:36 SjoW wrote:
On December 22 2010 15:33 Baarn wrote:
On December 22 2010 15:30 SjoW wrote:
Lets make this clear. We both wanted to participate on this league and if both would participate on this tournament it would decrease our chances of winning the grandprize (a computer).

The league consists of 18 tournaments and is played once a day. For every first place you get a prize and climb one step closer to the grandprize. You ultimatly need to win 11 tournament to get the grandprize and when there is only 18 tournaments, only one can get the grandprize.

So we both agreed it would be better if we split the prizes and just let one of us win everyone. (we assumed we would go to the finals everytime since we would be in diffrent part of brackets because of seeds, we didnt see any harm in it.

We talked with the organisation and they didnt allow us to do fixed matches. Now only one of us gonna play.



Ahh you agreed to "game" the tournament but got busted? Serves you right. Shame both of you aren't banned from that tournament and others.


This isnt any big league or anything. Nothing is streamed or no publicity just a fun tournament for gamers in a local gaming center. its not like we are playing infront of lots of people or anything.


So basically, you took a fun, community endeavour to have a cool local tournament, and abused it so that you and MorroW could literally win every single prize by making sure one of you finished first.

That's pretty shameful imo.

Just seems like you're greedy bastard trying to snatch whatever you can and exploit a tournament when the community is trying to host small tournaments to help grow e-sports, not let you win as many prizes as you can get your hands on.

You may not be letting down an audience, but I feel like it really lets down the community.


They didn't play the finals at all, they just took the prize when both of them were in the finals, basically splitting THAT T_T
~follow me on twitter.com/GGmarCoon
SiCkO_
Profile Joined September 2010
United States481 Posts
December 22 2010 06:54 GMT
#123
fair enough sjow, I like both you and morrow and since you guys at least talked with officials about it first I'm not going to complain.

Best of luck to both of you and good luck in your future games/tournys
SKT Toss line Fighting! | Bisu, BeSt, By.Sun! |
shindigs
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States4795 Posts
December 22 2010 06:54 GMT
#124
I preface my statement with the notion that I really condone this type of behavior in e-sports.

This type of thing is actually pretty common from what I've heard. It's a totally unrelated scene, but the same issue came up in the Super Smash Brothers Brawl community with the top two players aimed to split the prize at MLG in a similar fashion - it was condoned as match fixing. Even an acquaintance of mine did the same thing at a local tournament (nothing really big, but still). I always assumed that this type of thing happened in SC to some extent, and to some degree I can see why they see nothing "wrong" with it, but these players should also realize the gravity of doing something as frowned upon as "match fixing" in this regard.

I hope the players realize that though it seems "reasonable" to split the prize money if they both will be in the finals, that its a huge middle finger to a growing e-sports community that wants nothing more than integrity from the players.
Photographer@shindags || twitch.tv/shindigs
vOdToasT
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Sweden2870 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-22 06:57:11
December 22 2010 06:54 GMT
#125
On December 22 2010 15:51 FataLe wrote:
This sort of garbage is what taints e-sports.
Your robbing the fans of true and fair matches with proper results.

Shame on you two SjoW & MorroW. Hope you both get refused entry in future tournaments.


Im sorry for being a shitty poster, but god damn. Let me ask you something (again):

What is wrong with both of them wanting to participate and enjoy the events, while still wanting to win the biggest prizes, AND deciding that only one of them is going to play when an admin tells them that its not ok to match fix, despite the system?

They werent allowed to fix matches, so only one of them played - they havent cheated. Considering the way this event works, OF COURSE they dont want to beat each other. That means neither of them could win the big prize. Its not the same as match fixing when the winner of the finals just takes it all. This is a LADDER event.

Besides, when the admins said they werent allowed to both play, only one of them played... whats the big deal?


The only reason they didnt want to beat each other, is that if they did, neither of them could win a big prize, but they both wanted to participate in the event and enjoy it. An admin told them they wouldnt be allowed to do that, SO THEY DIDNT DO IT.

Of course they wanted to do it,... they both wanted to play, obviously. But in the end, only one of them played.

What is there to be pissed about?


What did they do thats bad?

I have a feeling you commented without reading every post. If you did read every post, explain yourself...
If it's stupid but it works, then it's not stupid* (*Or: You are stupid for losing to it, and gotta git gud)
huameng
Profile Blog Joined April 2007
United States1133 Posts
December 22 2010 06:55 GMT
#126
On December 22 2010 15:52 LegendaryZ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 22 2010 15:46 SjoW wrote:
On December 22 2010 15:41 Baarn wrote:
On December 22 2010 15:36 SjoW wrote:
On December 22 2010 15:33 Baarn wrote:
On December 22 2010 15:30 SjoW wrote:
Lets make this clear. We both wanted to participate on this league and if both would participate on this tournament it would decrease our chances of winning the grandprize (a computer).

The league consists of 18 tournaments and is played once a day. For every first place you get a prize and climb one step closer to the grandprize. You ultimatly need to win 11 tournament to get the grandprize and when there is only 18 tournaments, only one can get the grandprize.

So we both agreed it would be better if we split the prizes and just let one of us win everyone. (we assumed we would go to the finals everytime since we would be in diffrent part of brackets because of seeds, we didnt see any harm in it.

We talked with the organisation and they didnt allow us to do fixed matches. Now only one of us gonna play.



Ahh you agreed to "game" the tournament but got busted? Serves you right. Shame both of you aren't banned from that tournament and others.


This isnt any big league or anything. Nothing is streamed or no publicity just a fun tournament for gamers in a local gaming center. its not like we are playing infront of lots of people or anything.


So that makes it ok to predetermine winners because it's not a big name tournament? Who's to say this wouldn't occur in a larger one when you two get more confidence? It's still wrong deciding who's gonna win beforehand regardless of what tournament it is. If you want a computer that bad I hear EG has a tournament and you have to beat Idra. I guess doing this type of shit is easier than beating him eh?


I agree its wrong on a big tournament because it lets down the audiance. By not showing a good game or not a game at all. But in this case theres no audiance at all.


It's not an issue of cheating so much as it is an issue of betraying the spirit of competition and sportsmanship. What you do afterward with the prize money is, of course, your business, but would it have killed you guys to just play out the games normally and see who wins regardless? It's not as if it's some sort of massive investment of time or effort.


I don't think you get the situation.

It's not just 1 series they were gonna have to play, it's a series of a bunch of tournaments. If, like roughly expected, they split these tournies 50-50, they each get an ok prize. But if they let 1 guy win most of them, he gets a way bigger prize, which they could then split and each make more money.

Then they asked the tournament director and he said no, so one of them isn't playing. Nothing even happened. I have no idea why people are still mad, Sjow's posts cleared everything up.
skating
alacheesu
Profile Joined August 2010
21 Posts
December 22 2010 06:55 GMT
#127
On December 22 2010 15:50 SjoW wrote:Theres only one prize on each tournament and read what I typed... We expected to be in finals every single one we participated in...


Just let it be, man. I think at this point most people understand that no harm was done. The remaining people either don't understand or just don't want to understand, and there's not much you or anyone can do about that.
iCanada
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada10660 Posts
December 22 2010 06:55 GMT
#128
On December 22 2010 15:49 JoeSchmoe wrote:
match fixing is not cheating guys. the 2 people are in agreement.
lets just match fix every single game in GSL, force all the players to agree and split the money among all the participants. yes? this is how e-sports should really be. my liquibets will never be wrong ever again.


It isn't cheating, but it kills sports. IF suddenly i see that every single SC2 tournament is rigged, i'd stop watching them, that is for sure. And then, as more and more people stop watching, suddenly sponsors back out... then suddenly there is no tournament to be seen in the first place.

I hope you aren't serious... to say the least.
Subversion
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
South Africa3627 Posts
December 22 2010 06:56 GMT
#129
On December 22 2010 15:52 ectonym wrote:
No one here has a problem with the winner giving the prize to who he wants to if he can win it fairly.

I think that needs to be focus here.

reason for edit: i like italics


That isn't what they did though.

This is what they said (translated):

"We can play the finals then
But we just give
the victory to whoever we want"
tok
Profile Joined April 2010
United States691 Posts
December 22 2010 06:56 GMT
#130
Why would you even think this is ok? You do realize Brood War is still recovering from their scandal so why even attempt to do something similar?

I hope they kick you both out.
darmousseh
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States3437 Posts
December 22 2010 06:57 GMT
#131
Hahahahahahahahaha this is way blown out of proportions. This kind of thing is very common in sports. In nascar players will intentionally block another racer so that their teammate will win. In sumo, a wrestler facing elimination will get a free win from a player that has already qualified. It really depends on the rules and conditions surrounding the event.

If the rules are dumb enough such that to win the large prize you have to win a certain number of tournaments, but the chances are you and your buddy will split the tournaments evenly, then of course you do an agreement like this. What this really is is sjow and morrow trying to get around some dumb rules. Imagine if in the GSL they said that if you go 4-0 in the finals, then you get double the prize. That would be retarded.

Blame the system not the players.

Plus it's not televised or anything important. There won't be any bets going on and it will probably not end up online. Not a big deal at all.
Developer for http://mtgfiddle.com
dala
Profile Joined August 2010
Sweden477 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-22 07:04:00
December 22 2010 06:57 GMT
#132
*translation removed*

I agree with Ashzala:
On December 22 2010 15:45 Ashzala wrote:
I was going to translate the article, but after reading SjoW's post it's all clear, so I see no need to.

Unnecessary drama FTL!


SjoW's explanation:
+ Show Spoiler +
On December 22 2010 15:30 SjoW wrote:
Lets make this clear. We both wanted to participate on this league and if both would participate on this tournament it would decrease our chances of winning the grandprize (a computer).

The league consists of 18 tournaments and is played once a day. For every first place you get a prize and climb one step closer to the grandprize. You ultimatly need to win 11 tournament to get the grandprize and when there is only 18 tournaments, only one can get the grandprize.

So we both agreed it would be better if we split the prizes and just let one of us win everyone. (we assumed we would go to the finals everytime since we would be in diffrent part of brackets because of seeds, we didnt see any harm in it.

We talked with the organisation and they didnt allow us to do fixed matches. Now only one of us gonna play.


Integra
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Sweden5626 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-22 06:58:25
December 22 2010 06:57 GMT
#133
never mind
"Dark Pleasure" | | I survived the Locust war of May 3, 2014
lichter
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
December 22 2010 06:57 GMT
#134
I don't see what the big deal is. The way the event is structured discourages competition. If they split the competition evenly, noone gets the prize. The only way someone will win the big prize is if he dominates. The event was at a small internet cafe. It was an event to get people to play there, to make money. It wasn't a competition. The way it was structured was greedy and served to allow the business to get out of giving a sizable prize.

The two players asked permission if they could do this, since they were (apparently) obviously going to be in every finals. They weren't allowed, so only one person competed so that one could get the prize.

You are all over reacting. This was a small event made to make money for the cafe. Competition meant no one would get the prize. Morrow and Sjow wanted one of them to get it. So only one person entered. Match fixing didn't happen.

Match fixing is wrong and is a hindrance for the development of a professional sport. But this wasn't a tournament, nor was it anything important. It was as much a tournament as a lunchtime 1 on 1 on the court for a pot of money is the same as the NBA playoffs.
AdministratorYOU MUST HEED MY INSTRUCTIONS TAKE OFF YOUR THIIIINGS
Scarecrow
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Korea (South)9172 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-22 07:00:15
December 22 2010 06:58 GMT
#135
On December 22 2010 15:46 SjoW wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 22 2010 15:41 Baarn wrote:
On December 22 2010 15:36 SjoW wrote:
On December 22 2010 15:33 Baarn wrote:
On December 22 2010 15:30 SjoW wrote:
Lets make this clear. We both wanted to participate on this league and if both would participate on this tournament it would decrease our chances of winning the grandprize (a computer).

The league consists of 18 tournaments and is played once a day. For every first place you get a prize and climb one step closer to the grandprize. You ultimatly need to win 11 tournament to get the grandprize and when there is only 18 tournaments, only one can get the grandprize.

So we both agreed it would be better if we split the prizes and just let one of us win everyone. (we assumed we would go to the finals everytime since we would be in diffrent part of brackets because of seeds, we didnt see any harm in it.

We talked with the organisation and they didnt allow us to do fixed matches. Now only one of us gonna play.



Ahh you agreed to "game" the tournament but got busted? Serves you right. Shame both of you aren't banned from that tournament and others.


This isnt any big league or anything. Nothing is streamed or no publicity just a fun tournament for gamers in a local gaming center. its not like we are playing infront of lots of people or anything.


So that makes it ok to predetermine winners because it's not a big name tournament? Who's to say this wouldn't occur in a larger one when you two get more confidence? It's still wrong deciding who's gonna win beforehand regardless of what tournament it is. If you want a computer that bad I hear EG has a tournament and you have to beat Idra. I guess doing this type of shit is easier than beating him eh?


I agree its wrong on a big tournament because it lets down the audiance. By not showing a good game or not a game at all. But in this case theres no audiance at all.

You're letting down the sponsor/s, the other participants and E-sports in general. You're tainting known names and setting a terrible example. Shame on both of you. You deserve to be barred from future tourneys for this shit.
Yhamm is the god of predictions
vOdToasT
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Sweden2870 Posts
December 22 2010 06:58 GMT
#136
On December 22 2010 15:56 tok wrote:
Why would you even think this is ok? You do realize Brood War is still recovering from their scandal so why even attempt to do something similar?

I hope they kick you both out.


Lol I quit this thread.
If it's stupid but it works, then it's not stupid* (*Or: You are stupid for losing to it, and gotta git gud)
arcticStorm
Profile Joined January 2009
United States295 Posts
December 22 2010 06:58 GMT
#137
Honestly, I see no problem with this, unless they are benefiting monetarily at the expense of a third party, or harming other people's chances in the tournament. Since neither is the case, and both parties are in agreement, there is nothing wrong. What's to prevent sjow from not trying at the finals? Is he not entitled that right? If you don't like it, don't be a fan. Although, a much better way to deal with the issue: if morrow really wants the laptop, why can't he just play the finals normally and agree with sjow that sjow will give him the prize if he wins.
This statement is a lie.
djengizz
Profile Joined August 2010
Netherlands42 Posts
December 22 2010 06:59 GMT
#138
On December 22 2010 15:47 Subversion wrote:
So basically, you took a fun, community endeavour to have a cool local tournament, and abused it so that you and MorroW could literally win every single prize by making sure one of you finished first.

That's pretty shameful imo.

Just seems like you're greedy bastard trying to snatch whatever you can and exploit a tournament when the community is trying to host small tournaments to help grow e-sports, not let you win as many prizes as you can get your hands on.

You may not be letting down an audience, but I feel like it really lets down the community.

^^^^ This, and how you can not see this is beyond me (no matter if there's one prize or not).

How would you feel if you put up money for a showmatch only to find out the participants didn't even try to put up a good match but were only interested in getting the money the easiest way possible?
darmousseh
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States3437 Posts
December 22 2010 07:00 GMT
#139
Actually this is a good example of a prisoners dilemma.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prisoner's_dilemma

If sjow and morrow both try beat each other, they will end up with small prizes each. If they cooperate, they will end up with medium prizes each, but if one wants to cooporate and the other deceives and wins the whole prize, then one would end up with a large prize, but the other with a small or no prize.

Game Theory FTW
Developer for http://mtgfiddle.com
Shika
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Sweden1711 Posts
December 22 2010 07:00 GMT
#140
Can people stop going hyper and actually look at what SjoW is writing and also read up on the tournament structure? There is no cheating involved.

The way the tournament is setup it would be ridiculous for SjoW and MorroW to both play in it and give it their best against each other in the finals of the mini tours. They talked to the tournament administrators about if it would be okay for them to drop games on purpose to each other (in the finals where they both already have taken out one bracket each) and it was not so now only one of them plays, so that guy is guaranteed the big prize, instead of them screwing each other out of the big price by splitting wins.

In this particular tournament they are such huge favourites aswell that they are almost guaranteed to be in the finals of every one of the tours. Would be so stupid to split wins.

I'm annoyed by Rakaka aswell for their sensationalistic bullshit article tarnishing the name of two of swedens greats in SC2 without any form of research behind it.
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 9 49 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 15h 14m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
JimRising 654
Hui .398
JuggernautJason154
Rex 137
MindelVK 63
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 2879
Shuttle 2245
Mini 844
Larva 707
actioN 346
Soma 254
EffOrt 246
Rush 130
TY 100
Dewaltoss 87
[ Show more ]
JYJ74
Shine 64
Aegong 36
sas.Sziky 33
sorry 26
yabsab 20
Terrorterran 10
JulyZerg 6
Dota 2
capcasts1
Counter-Strike
fl0m3154
sgares387
oskar167
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu307
Other Games
gofns11316
tarik_tv3924
FrodaN2451
Grubby1287
Beastyqt818
KnowMe174
crisheroes118
Trikslyr55
ToD4
Organizations
StarCraft 2
CranKy Ducklings152
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• poizon28 26
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• 80smullet 8
• FirePhoenix4
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV956
• masondota2374
League of Legends
• Nemesis3676
Other Games
• imaqtpie930
• Shiphtur357
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
15h 14m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
19h 14m
CSO Cup
21h 14m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
23h 14m
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
1d 14h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 19h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 23h
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Online Event
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.