• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 02:22
CEST 08:22
KST 15:22
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202548RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams4Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread RSL Season 1 - Final Week The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
ASL20 Preliminary Maps Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [Update] ShieldBattery: 1v1 Fastest Support! BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams
Tourneys
CSL Xiamen International Invitational [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 687 users

Infusing Cash into Starcraft 2 - Page 10

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 8 9 10 11 12 19 Next All
dtz
Profile Joined September 2010
5834 Posts
December 14 2010 18:42 GMT
#181
I like the concept although legal restrictions will probably be too much. I think this concept might thrive because SC2 is in a stage when anything can happen and BO losses are very common such that it is anyone's game in a tournament. If going into 2nd or 3rd round in a tourney will double my entrance fee then sure why not i'll try to enter.

This is harder than in BW where you know exactly where you stand and a D player will never be able to take games from C or B players as often as a 2000 Diamond can take games from top 200 players.
shell
Profile Joined October 2010
Portugal2722 Posts
December 14 2010 18:49 GMT
#182
I think people are forgetting this is the beginning on SC2 so the money is still low outside of Korea, bigger prizes are always offline competitions because of cheating, internet, other abuses and value for the organizers and most of the top players have/will have contracts and receive salaries..

This type of tournament (weekly internet based) are just for practice/fun/prestige then money..

If you add ESWC, MLG, WCG, GSL, dreamhack,blizzcon, ECG, Arbalet, IEM, ESL series, smaller lans that will eventually appear in europe/USA there will be more money to win.

But i do like this system and i can see a future for it!

Imagine a huge tournament with 10$ or 20$ buy in with all the top pros and some other guys.. i bet lots of guys would pay just to have a chance at playing against the world's best!
BENFICA || Besties: idra, Stephano, Nestea, Jaedong, Serral, Jinro, Scarlett || Zerg <3
Bladefury
Profile Joined December 2010
25 Posts
December 14 2010 18:50 GMT
#183
Great idea! I have always wanted a system that allows a casual gamer like me to play for cash. I think it would make the whole multi-player gaming experience a lot more exhilarating. Just like in Wc3 and DotA, Sc2 will eventually come to a point where ladder rankings are no longer sufficient incentives to make the game fun for the regular gamer who does not have the time or commitment to make the step up to the competitive scene.
Diks
Profile Joined January 2010
Belgium1880 Posts
December 14 2010 19:00 GMT
#184
Very good post.
It really summarize my opinion on this.
If we want Starcraft 2 to grow bigger we have to invest a bit of our money.
I would even love to play in a 1 dollar tournament.
Why starting at 10 ?
daytrippers
Profile Joined May 2010
Sweden223 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-14 19:13:18
December 14 2010 19:03 GMT
#185
many people keep talking about "luck" in poker. the amount of luck between low lvl poker and low lvl starcraft is honestly not that different, and the factor of luck diminishes quickly as skill level increases in both sports..... unless you believe that the three different people that have won the world series of poker in back to back years are just the luckiest people in the world(doyle brunson won twice in a row and then got 2nd the third year)

but for the record the main problem seems to be the lack of tournaments, and furthermore lack of disparity of prizes in tournaments.
Bladefury
Profile Joined December 2010
25 Posts
December 14 2010 19:09 GMT
#186
There is definitely less luck involved when it comes to Sc2, which makes the concept of poker tournaments being applied to Sc2 even more viable and less of a legal concern. I think it is silly to consider paying entry fees to enter gaming competitions with cash prizes gambling when poker tournaments are totally legit and acceptable in society today.
crms
Profile Joined February 2010
United States11933 Posts
December 14 2010 19:30 GMT
#187
On December 14 2010 14:21 Jombozeus wrote:

The skill gap is MUCH bigger and VERY defined in Starcraft 2. Looking at a guy's ranking and seeing him 2600 Diamond while you're 1900 Diamond means your likelihood to lose is probably 90%. This doesn't inspire buy-ins.



this is so full of shit I don't know what to say... I almost never ladder, I have 900 ladder points 65% win rate and a 1400 bonus pool. I regulary enter these small tournaments (free buy ins) and knock off players 2500+. You're making ladder points wayyy to significant. The only thing ladder points can tell you is a general sense of how solid a player is once youre in the top range 2700+ or so. You can generally expect they will have solid play or well organized cheeses.
http://i.imgur.com/fAUOr2c.png | Fighting games are great
Metalwing
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Turkey1038 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-14 19:46:31
December 14 2010 19:43 GMT
#188
On December 15 2010 03:25 Deckkie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2010 03:18 Metalwing wrote:
So, let me understand this clearly. You're proposing a new reason for creation of new people who cheese their way to tournament finals or turtle up in an island base, as if the number of people playing lame games is not enough. Joining a tournament with free signups is good. It allows casual gamers to join tournaments and play like they want to. But when people invest in something, they will do anything to win. Cheesing, turtling up in island bases, stupid allins for the sake of winning odd games will happen just more and it's just the opposite of what people want.

In poker, people bluff other people, and it's always funny and enjoyable to see people getting bluffed by jack high or anything like that. But, in Starcraft, people do all sorts of lame play like Thor Drops, stupid cheeses, turtling up at island bases. I don't know about everybody, but I hate people doing this. Yes, pulling off a good cheese is good too, and people laugh at it as well. But, if cheese happens in every single game of a particular matchup (cough, TvZ, cough), it's not. I don't know about you, but neither NewDawn, nor IdrA (nor ret nor NesTea) deserved to get eliminated by the stupidest plays from lesser skilled players (yes, I really think that mvp is not nearly as good as IdrA and most of the TvZ strats are ridiculously stupid. Even if mvp is really better than IdrA, i don't think anyone would disagree with the skill comparison between NewDawn and bitbybit or NesTea and rain).

I just want to see what people think about this:

Poll: Do you really want more lame play after GSL Season 3

Yes (10)
 
91%

No (1)
 
9%

11 total votes

Your vote: Do you really want more lame play after GSL Season 3

(Vote): Yes
(Vote): No



For the second reason why i think this would be a bad idea: Because casual gaming will be ruined so hard. I don't think that really 1024 out of 1024 people who join go4sc2 cup really do it because of money. Actually I would hardly believe that even 24 out of 1024 people join that for money (particular example is particular, again). And, yes. I'm one in a thousand. You can easily say that "Yeah but we can make tournaments skill level restricted.". I neither know that you already know this, nor give a fuck: Some people are so underrated or purposefully lose in the ladder for the sake of staying in lower leagues. And those people will chobostomp the people who is really silver level and wants to join a tourney and have fun with people of the same skill as him. Your idea is the e-sports equivalent of making basketball courts in the streets pay to play.

Poll: Would you pay to play at a basketball court?

Yes (12)
 
86%

No (2)
 
14%

14 total votes

Your vote: Would you pay to play at a basketball court?

(Vote): Yes
(Vote): No



So much anger. i dont how this is the same as paying to play basketball. Betting on basketball games is something that happens (same thing as this will do). And its stupid to say that players shouldnt use particular strats like cheesing. Cheesing helps the game develop and it is, should, and always will be a part of the game!


Who is talking about

1- Cheese is evil and it should be punished? What I mean is, cheese would not be a problem if it wasn't the most viable strat in some matchups or races and easily punishable for others.

2- Betting on basketball games? I was actually talking about paying for a basketball court for playing it. Let me be more clear. You pay 10 bucks to the owner of a basketball court in the street, you play 1 hour, after that 1 hour finishes, you leave.

On December 15 2010 03:29 xOff wrote:
@metal I have actually bet on basketball games all the time :D

I understand where you're coming from, but its a whole new experience playing with risk as opposed to playing with nothing on the line. You are correct when you said there will be mass cheesing, but even in GSL there is mass cheesing with money on the line.


Exactly, this is what I'm saying. Even when the money on the line is not their very own money, people cheese this hard. If it's also their own money, people would cheese more.
#1 CheckPrime fan // Terrans gonna Terran
Influ
Profile Joined September 2010
Germany780 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-14 19:50:51
December 14 2010 19:48 GMT
#189
As someone who has rarely the time to play in tournements and likes to watch streams I want the stream/tournement in quality and then i would think about paying the organizer / organisation for that like every other product with the difference I also would like to support esports.

For example i know Take and HomerJ are organizing a huge tournament kind of Homestory Cup 2. I know many people allready donated money for that tounement and I consider to do that as well but when i google 5 minutes for the tournement and I don't find anything I rapidly loose interest in donating. For me the bad publishing of the tournement is a lack of quality so why should I pay? Same thing with GSL.
Everybody knows how bad the stream is so for me the thought of paying them for that is hilarious.
I do pay for ESL Premium for years now because the pure quantity of shows (for Germans at least) for that low amount money is just plain awesome even if I sometimes rage at ESL when they have their moments.

Next point is the number of tournements. The amount of tournements with a low price pool is sick and i can't keep up with all that stuff and if there is tournement every day with european and amarican top players it's just not that interesting to watch after a while.

So my opinion what needs to be done for getting money to esports:

-Sponsors should stop spending money on 3 events at the same time and do the big throw, I think Sony Erricson is pretty happy with their investment in GSL.

-Tournement organization has to become as professional as they can and minimize technical difficulties and stuff to almost zero. I know it is hard to get there without a lot of money but still.
sekishusai
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
80 Posts
December 14 2010 19:49 GMT
#190
That's now how sports work. Every big tournaments need sponsors. What we need is the companies to realize that there will be return if they invest in esports. Tennis tournaments wont happen if there are no sponsors. There will be no sponsors if the game is not attractive to the big public. That's how it is. It will take a long time before any game will have real money in its competitive aspect.
red_hq
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Canada450 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-14 19:52:26
December 14 2010 19:50 GMT
#191
On December 15 2010 04:00 Diks wrote:
Very good post.
It really summarize my opinion on this.
If we want Starcraft 2 to grow bigger we have to invest a bit of our money.
I would even love to play in a 1 dollar tournament.
Why starting at 10 ?



Paypal fees, minimum transaction fee is something like 30¢

Just a question would you guys play in a tourney that looked like this?

64 players
$10 entry
Prize distribution:
1 : $240
2 : $120
3-4: $60
5-8: $30

That leaves a $40 headroom for paypal fees royalties etc.

I'm sure if you don't skim or rake the pool you can skirt a lot of legal issues.

Your odds assuming all of your MU's are 50-50 if 1/8 to get prizes which isn't the worst of odds even assuming you get 3 or 4 ringers in your tournament there is still 4 wild card spots that triple your entry fee. This sort of 40/20/10/10/5/5/5/5 distribution will probably attract the lower level players as well because of the increased amount of prize slots. Then on top of that sponsers would just add to the prize pool.
Get some 'good' Dota 2: twitch.tv/redhq
UltraVires
Profile Joined April 2010
United States241 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-14 19:59:24
December 14 2010 19:52 GMT
#192
2- Betting on basketball games? I was actually talking about paying for a basketball court for playing it. Let me be more clear. You pay 10 bucks to the owner of a basketball court in the street, you play 1 hour, after that 1 hour finishes, you leave.


No one's talking about requiring pay-to-play for every game. Free bnet ladder would still be avail to everyone. We're talking about totally optional sit'n'go style tournaments. So the better analogy is this: Do you want 1 basketball court where most everyone plays "for fun" or two: the "fun" court and the pay-to-play tournament court?

Edit: If you hate cheese, you should prefer two courts, at least if you're right that tournaments will attract the cheesy players. You'd be welcome to stay on ladder, which would presumably be less cheesy.
orotoss
Profile Joined September 2010
United States298 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-14 20:38:16
December 14 2010 19:52 GMT
#193
If Blizzard were to initiate this, I suspect that Starcraft 2 would become the biggest e-sport of all time. The level of competition would be insanely high, and it would not only make games more exciting, but the level of spectatorship would inevitably rise as well.

Legal issues aside, it would not be terribly difficult to organize. Blizzard could simply copy the structure of any poker site out there. Start out by doing a few weekly tournaments to get the hang of things, and then increase the amount. If there were like 50 tournies to choose from on a saturday afternoon, I'm sure plenty of unknowns could win some cash. Also, they could use a payout scale that gives money back to players who get to the second round. This would encourage much more tournament play while still allowing for a decent payout to first place.

Blizzard could easily incorporate a raking system, which would make them tons of money. And they could use that money to pay for their new employees, because I feel like the only viable way to do these tournies would be to have Blizzard moderators in charge of setting up the games and observing.

Unfortunately, I don't see this kind of thing ever happening for Starcraft 2. Considering how many legal issues surround poker sites (especially in the US), this kind of thing would be waayyy too risky for Blizzard to do. It may be possible to do it in other countries with less stringent gambling laws, but I doubt Blizzard would even bother.

EDIT
I take back the gambling laws part, after reading a post by insanious. Apparently, MTG online has buy in tournaments with cash prizes all the time. I am suddenly a lot more hopeful for Starcraft 2 to do something like this.
BLARRGHGHH
DreamSailor
Profile Joined June 2010
Canada433 Posts
December 14 2010 19:58 GMT
#194
Also worth noting is the amount of time for 64 players to play, then the 32, then the 16 all the way to the winner actually takes an absurdly long time. A game can be anywhere from 8 minutes to 45 on average. You could potentially be playing a lot hours for ~200 bucks.
Where ever you go, there you are.
orotoss
Profile Joined September 2010
United States298 Posts
December 14 2010 20:04 GMT
#195
On December 15 2010 04:58 DreamSailor wrote:
Also worth noting is the amount of time for 64 players to play, then the 32, then the 16 all the way to the winner actually takes an absurdly long time. A game can be anywhere from 8 minutes to 45 on average. You could potentially be playing a lot hours for ~200 bucks.


Very true, but currently there are plenty of players playing several hours for 0 bucks. This will at least allow some non-pro gamers to experience the excitement of playing in a tournament, while still having a chance to make some cash.
BLARRGHGHH
nkr
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Sweden5451 Posts
December 14 2010 20:05 GMT
#196
I don't like the idea. This is not the direction e-Sports should be taken if you ask me. Some things shouldn't just be about the money
ESPORTS ILLUMINATI
Pharaun
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Germany150 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-14 20:08:44
December 14 2010 20:06 GMT
#197
only one thing: Starcraft is not the same as Poker, cause Starcraft haven't got thousands/millions of fishes, paying money and loose constantly.

oh an, when u want to realize this, u will need a sofrtware/or site, where maybe can cash in 20$ and play several tournaments with you're 20$ bankroll. And not cash in for every tournament.

And jeah, "Micros" should be availible, maybe 20c tournaments, why not?


omg, more andm ore ideas are coming to my head: the luck factor in sc2 should be to less to atract bad players thht just want to win some money with luck like in poker...
It has to start somewhere. - It has to start sometime. - What better place than here. - What better time than now?!!!! -All hell can't stop us now
DreamSailor
Profile Joined June 2010
Canada433 Posts
December 14 2010 20:07 GMT
#198
On December 15 2010 05:04 orotoss wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 15 2010 04:58 DreamSailor wrote:
Also worth noting is the amount of time for 64 players to play, then the 32, then the 16 all the way to the winner actually takes an absurdly long time. A game can be anywhere from 8 minutes to 45 on average. You could potentially be playing a lot hours for ~200 bucks.


Very true, but currently there are plenty of players playing several hours for 0 bucks. This will at least allow some non-pro gamers to experience the excitement of playing in a tournament, while still having a chance to make some cash.


True, but these tourneys could easily be 4+hours long. Would you have set breaks? Every player would have to wait for his next opponent to finish, and there could be potentially huge backlogs of people, just waiting, they can't start another game because what if their opponent finishes? They're kind of just in a deadzone of waiting around, which isn't fun.

I'm not saying its impossible, if you worked out the kinks I think it could be awesome. I just think theres a couple of huge issues that need to be addressed.
Where ever you go, there you are.
-Archangel-
Profile Joined May 2010
Croatia7457 Posts
December 14 2010 20:08 GMT
#199
On December 15 2010 01:57 UltraVires wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 14 2010 16:45 Hot_Bid wrote:
You're missing the point of why people play SC2. Sure, a small minority play with money as a motivator, but the vast majority (99%) play for fun. Most of the big names play these buy in tournaments that probably net them $10/hr (and that's if they win) because they'd be playing anyway, not because they feel it's +EV or something.

Thus, a buy-in scene is just not sustainable when the bulk of the people buying in can just play the dozens of other tournaments without buyins. The difference in experience of playing in a $10 buy in tourney vs a free-to-enter tournament is nothing to the average player. What does a buy in get you? In poker the experience of playing in a big tournament with high stakes is pretty fun. You even have a small chance to go really far if you're lucky. In SC2 for an average player paying $10 to play maybe 1, 2 Bo3s with 0% chance to cash? That just won't be worth it. Entry fees are fine when you're actually paying for an experience that nobody else can provide (MLG, etc) but for a regular online tournament, it's just not worth it.


You're right that most people play SC2 just to have fun. But that's exactly the point -- monetizing SC2 with a gambling system would go a long way toward making it more of an esport and less of a "fun hobby." And it would get a lot more people playing seriously. How many people would take poker seriously if no money were involved? And how many more people would take SC2 seriously if money were involved?

+ Show Spoiler +
High five for UM law and posting in this thread instead of studying for torts!


Show nested quote +
On December 14 2010 17:00 vOdToasT wrote:
Buy in tournaments would be pretty awesome if the top 50% or top 25% got money, imo.

Let's say you have a 10$ payin with 64 people. That gives 640 dollars. You could easily pay the top 50% (the higher you placed, the more you would get, naturally)


I agree with this. If only top 3 got paid, HotBid is right, almost everyone would have no chance of winning. But if top half get paid, that changes everything. I'm pretty bad, but I'd pay to enter something like this:

$10 entry fee, 64 players
17-32 get their $10 back
16-9 get $15
8-5 get $25
3+4 get $40
2 gets $60
1 gets $120.

If you get past the first round, it's a break even proposition.

One might ask why someone would pay $10 for the chance to win $120 at most in a 64 man tournament. The margins are much higher in poker tournaments. But as people have already pointed out, poker involves more luck than SC2. So it's easier to predict how well one will do in an SC 2 tournament than in a poker tournament. And since there's less risk, the reward can be correspondingly smaller. + Show Spoiler +
This is a big assumption, I realize. There's still plenty of luck in tournaments based on who enters and how the brackets turn out. But SC2 def involves less risk than poker.


Another key to making this work would be to set up something like Poker Stars. One reason I don't bother with free sc2 tournaments is that it's a hassle to enter, schedule, etc. If I could log on, click to pay $10, and be playing the tournament within 15 mins, like a sitngo style online poker tournament, I'd be much more likely to play. If it comes down to picking between a weekly $10 tournament and a weekly free tournament, however, HotBid is again right, a gambling system would probably fail.

Chuck Norris approves of this message.
Skoobasteve
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States52 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-14 20:44:39
December 14 2010 20:10 GMT
#200
Ninja edit, durp.

Good idea^^
Prev 1 8 9 10 11 12 19 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 3h 38m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft612
StarCraft: Brood War
firebathero 1260
Leta 512
Zeus 187
Noble 56
ajuk12(nOOB) 13
Britney 0
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K925
Other Games
summit1g10886
SortOf31
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1367
BasetradeTV49
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• practicex 63
• Sammyuel 21
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 6
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Scarra2303
• Stunt992
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
3h 38m
Reynor vs Zoun
Solar vs SHIN
Classic vs ShoWTimE
Cure vs Rogue
Esports World Cup
1d 4h
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
CSO Cup
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
5 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.