EPTAwesome/Confusing SC2 BM - Page 371
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Cokefreak
Finland8095 Posts
| ||
|
FFW_Rude
France10201 Posts
On September 29 2015 03:30 rotta wrote: So little bm lately, and the few instances are in no way awesome/confusing/interesting. What has happened? I guess this picture belongs here: ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/EgtWNT2.png) Is this real ? lol | ||
Fecalfeast
Canada11355 Posts
yes, he was joking and smiled the next second | ||
|
FFW_Rude
France10201 Posts
On September 29 2015 17:49 Fecalfeast wrote: yes, he was joking and smiled the next second Oh yeah i'm sure he was. Found that funny that he did that. Against Has i suppose ? | ||
|
rotta
5595 Posts
On September 29 2015 18:59 FFW_Rude wrote: Oh yeah i'm sure he was. Found that funny that he did that. Against Has i suppose ? None other. I really hope the two meet again soon! | ||
|
rotta
5595 Posts
On September 29 2015 06:23 The_Templar wrote: I'm sure things will pick up once LotV comes out. Maybe so... ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/J44vd5A.png) I used exactly 0 Overcharges to defend his Bunker rush... huh. | ||
|
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
On October 02 2015 07:39 rotta wrote: Maybe so... I used exactly 0 Overcharges to defend his Bunker rush... huh. What's a seelin rank? I want to be seelin rank! If it attracts that much jealousy it must be something desirable. Oh. And OBVIOUSLY it was the mere threat of photon overcharge that made him not commit at crucial moments and effectively lost him the game. Obviously. GG DK.  | ||
|
Simberto
Germany11620 Posts
"SC2 sealing ranks" | ||
|
corydoras
161 Posts
![[image loading]](https://i.imgur.com/zVsw5Vv.png) | ||
|
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
On October 05 2015 05:56 corydoras wrote: So I was really curious about a quick baneling bust which I luckily scouted in LotV beta... Never seen it before, held it after scouting and was massively ahead for the reaminder of the game. I wondered how often the bust worked. Apparently, it was a secret and a 'wp imba op' misdirection was necessary to hide the stats behind my opponent's build. You had a legitimate question, but it rarely goes down well when you message someone you beat after the game. No matter what you say or how well you mean, it very often comes across as gloating and rubbing the loss into their face. If I really really had to, I'd start with an apology for messaging and then just asking if I could ask them a question about their build or something (and back off with more apologies if they are not up for it, or you get insults back or w/e). If you start by being almost overly apologetic for messaging you may have better chances of actually getting a meaningful conversation. I mean, I don't want to legitimise being BM when you get messaged after a loss, but you have to realise that you are to some extent asking for it. | ||
|
corydoras
161 Posts
But this is getting off topic so...well, thanks for the explanation?  I must have been spoiled by cases of people actually discussing the builds and practicing with me off-ladder right after games. | ||
|
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
On October 05 2015 15:31 corydoras wrote: And that's why we can't have nice things. Blizz may make the UI more 'social', but social norms like this will still prevent legitimate interaction. This is weird especially in beta when people are still trying to figure out the game. But this is getting off topic so...well, thanks for the explanation? I must have been spoiled by cases of people actually discussing the builds and practicing with me off-ladder right after games. You have probably messaged a lot more people after games than I have, so I guess you know better what works and what doesn't. I just know that we see a lot of BM in this thread that is initiated by the winner messaging the loser after game, although often with a more provocative message than yours. And if no BM happens, we won't see it in this thread. So well, I'm happy to hear that you often get good response. Restores a bit of faith in the community! | ||
|
deacon.frost
Czech Republic12129 Posts
On October 05 2015 15:31 corydoras wrote: And that's why we can't have nice things. Blizz may make the UI more 'social', but social norms like this will still prevent legitimate interaction. This is weird especially in beta when people are still trying to figure out the game. But this is getting off topic so...well, thanks for the explanation? I must have been spoiled by cases of people actually discussing the builds and practicing with me off-ladder right after games. If you messaged me after a losing streak I would BM you much more(not saying (s)he was on a losing streak, just saying that this is totally acceptable from people on it). | ||
|
corydoras
161 Posts
EDIT: Don't want to mess up this thread so I started a separate one. | ||
|
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
On October 05 2015 18:03 corydoras wrote: It could be socially acceptable to answer rudely in such cases: okay, I can deal with it, unlikely I can change anything. What I don't get is that the community demands more social features even though the 'social norms' of the community dissuade people from using them even if they are finally there (like in LotV). EDIT: Don't want to mess up this thread so I started a separate one. People are nice to each other in general. Just not always when contacted by someone that just beat them. | ||
|
brickrd
United States4894 Posts
On October 05 2015 21:14 Cascade wrote: People are nice to each other in general. Just not always when contacted by someone that just beat them. also "the community" is not a homogeneous blob with a single hivemind opinion | ||
|
InfCereal
Canada1759 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/3HPY9pl.png) Keke. You get a lot of fun BM with cheeky strats on dash and terminal. Replay: http://replays.sc/148 | ||
Divias
35 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/zSWMzio.jpg) I dont even.... | ||
|
riotjune
United States3394 Posts
| ||
|
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
On October 11 2015 06:55 Divias wrote: I dont even.... He wrote a little PhD thesis there for you, without any reply at all... >_> the length people go to to feel better about a loss... Remember: NEVER try to think about what you could have done better! NEVER! Blame you opponent! Blame the game! Both! NEVER things that you can actually influence! Your play was FLAWLESS! | ||
| ||
