EPTBut to draw the same thing randomly three times in a row is simply unlucky. That's the definition of bad luck... random things swinging against you rather than back and forth. I think Machine just gets nervous at LANs, and under performs. I'm hoping he can change that around this time, since I really think he's in the top 3 zergs in NA.
Machine confirmed unluckiest player in world - Page 8
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
RookM
United States45 Posts
But to draw the same thing randomly three times in a row is simply unlucky. That's the definition of bad luck... random things swinging against you rather than back and forth. I think Machine just gets nervous at LANs, and under performs. I'm hoping he can change that around this time, since I really think he's in the top 3 zergs in NA. | ||
|
danbel1005
United States1319 Posts
GO GO Machine Fighting. Next time as u already know ur opponent u wont get knocked out by him. "Hopefully" | ||
|
IPA
United States3206 Posts
GL versus SeleCT. /thread | ||
|
Baarn
United States2702 Posts
| ||
|
Chiburi
United States166 Posts
| ||
|
Lightswarm
Canada967 Posts
| ||
|
OwlFeet
75 Posts
| ||
|
Vz0
Canada378 Posts
I mean did yuo see how easy it was for Machine to Win? Scouts 1/1/1 banshee, okay, make a bunch of banelings, GG. All this is because terran is unable to put on early pressure that can diminish the Zerg's opportunities. Again all this is as far as I can see, I am not provoking QQing but simply analysis. | ||
|
Whiladan
United States463 Posts
On November 07 2010 07:15 Vz0 wrote: machine vs select.. seriously.. I think Z is over powred (and I am a Protoss player, search me up Virgozero) so this ain't some bias BS. I mean did yuo see how easy it was for Machine to Win? Scouts 1/1/1 banshee, okay, make a bunch of banelings, GG. All this is because terran is unable to put on early pressure that can diminish the Zerg's opportunities. Again all this is as far as I can see, I am not provoking QQing but simply analysis. You should watch FoxeR vs FruitDealer. SeleCT was outplayed. | ||
|
Mortecian
Canada87 Posts
It's just called a VERY good timing >_>;; | ||
|
Ghad
Norway2551 Posts
| ||
|
leftykill
United States120 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
iSTime
1579 Posts
On November 07 2010 07:02 Baarn wrote: Team killing is not fun and the brackets should be setup to avoid it. Yes, let's give an unfair advantage to people who are on top teams in an individual tournament, that makes sense. | ||
|
sely
United States30 Posts
If you care about the integrity of this or any other tournament than team affiliations should NEVER influence seeding. Invitational tourneys may be an exception. I am really surprised that so many people seem outraged about teammates facing each other. Congrats to Machine however for doing so well to this point. | ||
|
Alejandrisha
United States6566 Posts
On November 07 2010 07:15 Vz0 wrote: machine vs select.. seriously.. I think Z is over powred (and I am a Protoss player, search me up Virgozero) so this ain't some bias BS. I mean did yuo see how easy it was for Machine to Win? Scouts 1/1/1 banshee, okay, make a bunch of banelings, GG. All this is because terran is unable to put on early pressure that can diminish the Zerg's opportunities. Again all this is as far as I can see, I am not provoking QQing but simply analysis. Remember that select has publicly announced that he didn't have any zerg practice partner leading up to DC just a few weeks ago and that zerg vs terran meta game is very highly developed (since there is no protoss representation in the gsl herp derp). Zergs have figured out how to pick apart terrans and I think a lot of terrans are still used to being ahead in the mid game because of pre 1.12 "abuse" and now that the play field is leveled, a lot of terrans are struggling to figure out how to deal with mid-late game zergs. | ||
|
Aegeis
United States1619 Posts
| ||
|
CtrlAltGG
United States36 Posts
On November 07 2010 07:02 Baarn wrote: Team killing is not fun and the brackets should be setup to avoid it. Too true its been happening a lot the only people members of team liquid have lost to are other team liquid members. But when 2/3s of the seeded players (made up statistic but its still A LOT) and about half the entire field are split between 3 or foir teams its gonna happen. EG Machine FTW | ||
|
Moa
United States790 Posts
On November 07 2010 07:33 CtrlAltGG wrote: Too true its been happening a lot the only people members of team liquid have lost to are other team liquid members. But when 2/3s of the seeded players (made up statistic but its still A LOT) and about half the entire field are split between 3 or foir teams its gonna happen. EG Machine FTW I don't have a problem with the brackets not taking teams into account but I would like to see some Team tournaments. | ||
|
Nayl
Canada413 Posts
On November 07 2010 07:25 sely wrote: Is potentially facing a teammate in the third round of a tournament really that unlucky? There are like 7 EG players in this tourney, and a bunch of Liquid, Root, etc., when it is acceptable for two players on the same team to face each other? Ro8? Ro4? Finals? If you care about the integrity of this or any other tournament than team affiliations should NEVER influence seeding. Invitational tourneys may be an exception. I am really surprised that so many people seem outraged about teammates facing each other. Congrats to Machine however for doing so well to this point. read the thread? hes unlucky because he faced incontrol early on for the past 2 MLGs as well. | ||
| ||
