EPTBeta Version 0.20.0.16036 Incoming! - Page 18
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Schryver
United States29 Posts
| ||
|
ta2
125 Posts
Terran was not OP enough so we buffed them a bit more. We changed Zerg and Protoss slightly to make it look like we care. User was warned for this post | ||
|
Notorious-B.I.G
77 Posts
| ||
|
ztranger
Sweden57 Posts
| ||
|
ta2
125 Posts
Please put some effort into your posts. One word replies and other low content posts are not appreciated here. What? My most is longer than the two before me and the one after it, but I don't see them getting warnings. Oh wait, maybe I said something that you disagree with. | ||
|
senor_gomez
United States162 Posts
I missed some posts | ||
NonY
8748 Posts
On July 15 2010 11:34 ta2 wrote: What? My most is longer than the two before me and the one after it, but I don't see them getting warnings. Oh wait, maybe I said something that you disagree with. I'm not a moderator or staff so don't take my comment as anything but another poster's opinion. Both your posts in this thread are unnecessarily insulting. I see people get away with low content posts when they express a harmless and relevant opinion. You insulted Blizzard's balancing. That's not a problem in itself. Critiques of Blizzard are some of the best posts made on tl.net. But you could take a neutral tone with your critique. You could provide reasons. You could be detailed. But nah, you thought you'd improve the thread by assuming the tone of an asshole and saying the patch sucks. And now you're defending it. Anyone can see that your reply wasn't a wonderful addition to the thread. There is no legitimacy to comparing your posts with the posts of other people that have gone unpunished. Either your post sucked or it didn't. It did. The Banlings thing is just getting going. Hopefully bad posts will become less frequent. Are you really suggesting that those posts sucked, but you made sure to cross some threshold (higher word count?) to ensure that your post doesn't? Or you think all those posts are great? Or do you think they all suck? I can see how they all suck but I can also see how yours is a step below theirs. Suggesting that you get a warning because a moderator disagreed with you does not help you at all. If you think your post was really legitimate, there are much more effective ways to defend yourself. If you admit your post sucked, there are much better ways to apologize. You just want to be a martyr. Or, I guess more likely, you don't put any thought into these posts at all. | ||
| ||
