EPTOn May 30 2010 19:41 arew wrote:
It's not a chatcraft, it's STARCRAFT!
It's not a chatcraft, it's STARCRAFT!
chatcraft > starcraft
Blizzard: "No plans for chatrooms, crossrealm play" - Page…
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Zoler
Sweden6339 Posts
chatcraft > starcraft | ||
|
Ganondorf
Italy600 Posts
| ||
|
Jenslyn87
Denmark527 Posts
 | ||
|
Archerofaiur
United States4101 Posts
| ||
|
Error Ash
Germany177 Posts
| ||
|
DtE
France36 Posts
| ||
|
Leeoku
1617 Posts
| ||
|
BSandT
Australia18 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=128252¤tpage=18 | ||
|
Archerofaiur
United States4101 Posts
On May 30 2010 22:50 BSandT wrote: Guys plz visit this thread and vote at this pole. Ur support is needed. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=128252¤tpage=18 That is not a constructive poll. | ||
|
Orzabal
France287 Posts
Omg is this a joke ? There is any real gamer involve in the conception of Bnet.2.0 ? Do they realise how chat channel are important to have a solid community ? (sorry for my poor english) | ||
|
Archerofaiur
United States4101 Posts
We almost have 3000 It only took 700 to make EA notice with SPORE'S DRM. | ||
|
abrasion
Australia722 Posts
On May 30 2010 11:36 NintendoStar wrote: You have to buy 2 games to switch servers? What the hell was wrong with SC1's system? It wasn't profitable enough and Activision (Blizzard?) want to gouge people, like assholes. | ||
|
abrasion
Australia722 Posts
On May 30 2010 19:21 teapot wrote: tbh he just validated the fears that had been growing on many people since the start of the beta when they realized battle.net 0.2 was terrible. It was just that there was a bit of hope that something better might be coming on release, because you know it is just a beta, right?. But he dashed all those hopes in one fell swoop. So all this pent up fury just broke loose. Pretty good description to be honest - he confirmed all fears and arrogantly too, the man is a proper, proper cock. | ||
|
p14c
Vatican City State431 Posts
Blizzard is becoming a very greedy company! What's next? Monthly fee like WOW? | ||
|
Pyrthas
United States3196 Posts
Incgamer's Full Frank Pearce Interview Even though you might be playing soccer within the context of the league, you're not playing at a professional competitive level, but you still feel like you're competitive within your league. What about the people who are playing at a high (even if non-professional) competitive level? What sort of high-level competition has a bunch of little rankings without an overall one? | ||
|
Hold-Lurker
United States403 Posts
On May 30 2010 23:36 Archerofaiur wrote: Guys if you havnt voted yet We almost have 3000 It only took 700 to make EA notice with SPORE'S DRM. I actually didn't end up buying Spore based in part on the Amazon reviews, but did they actually impact the overall game's sales? I did not follow how popular it did or did not get. | ||
|
AJMcSpiffy
United States1154 Posts
| ||
|
hifriend
China7935 Posts
On May 30 2010 21:45 Ganondorf wrote: Looking forward to iccup 2. Removing lan, cross-server play (unless you want to pay 3x the price), chat rooms, will favour piracy and pirate servers. gg Blizzard lol as if blizzard would allow pirate servers for sc2... get real | ||
|
clusen
Germany8702 Posts
On May 30 2010 11:07 Dremic wrote: Honestly I am much more bothered by how boring ladder is, and less upset about the b.net 2.0 format. b.net 2.0 is going to evolve over time and will get better as they continue. idk if any of you played wow when it first came out, but the amount of development that went into the game was amazing. it's their first try and it will continue to develop because theyre going to use it on all games made from now on. by the time diablo 3 releases b.net will have what most of you want im sure. Blizzard had no experience whatsoever when they made WoW, so of course they had to learn. And WoW costs friggin ~12€ per month, what do you expect? They have more than ten years experience with bnet1. As the name BNet 2.0 suggests it is not their first try... They know exactly what "we" want. But they also know what they want, and both can not be achieved as it seems. Activison does not like to satisfiy players, they just like to make money. Where one pissed customer leaves 2 new come up. | ||
|
wiesel
Germany727 Posts
On May 31 2010 00:05 hifriend wrote: lol as if blizzard would allow pirate servers for sc2... get real i think people said the same about WoW private servers at first? And still they are here | ||
| ||
