• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 13:07
CET 19:07
KST 03:07
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT28Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book19Clem wins HomeStory Cup 289HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview13Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info8
Community News
Weekly Cups (Feb 16-22): MaxPax doubles0Weekly Cups (Feb 9-15): herO doubles up2ACS replaced by "ASL Season Open" - Starts 21/0244LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals (Feb 10-16)46Weekly Cups (Feb 2-8): Classic, Solar, MaxPax win2
StarCraft 2
General
ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT How do you think the 5.0.15 balance patch (Oct 2025) for StarCraft II has affected the game? Oliveira Would Have Returned If EWC Continued Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book Weekly Cups (Feb 16-22): MaxPax doubles
Tourneys
The Dave Testa Open #11 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament PIG STY FESTIVAL 7.0! (19 Feb - 1 Mar) StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ? [A] Starcraft Sound Mod
External Content
Mutation # 514 Ulnar New Year The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 513 Attrition Warfare Mutation # 512 Overclocked
Brood War
General
ACS replaced by "ASL Season Open" - Starts 21/02 BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ CasterMuse Youtube TvZ is the most complete match up A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone
Tourneys
Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 1 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [LIVE] [S:21] ASL Season Open Day 1 Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers Zealot bombing is no longer popular?
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread New broswer game : STG-World
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Mexico's Drug War Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Ask and answer stupid questions here!
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TL MMA Pick'em Pool 2013
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Unintentional protectionism…
Uldridge
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Inside the Communication of …
TrAiDoS
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1159 users

[PICS] Zerglings Unblockable with Roaches? - Page 2

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
Senx
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Sweden5901 Posts
March 10 2010 21:52 GMT
#21
thats pretty bad :/
"trash micro but win - its marine" MC commentary during HSC 4
mrmin123 *
Profile Blog Joined January 2004
Korea (South)2971 Posts
March 10 2010 21:57 GMT
#22
Maybe the zerglings are running through the roachs' legs.
Translator태양은 묘지위에 붉게 떠오르고 / 한낮에 찌는 더위는 나의 시련 일찌라!
Fusionz
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States54 Posts
March 10 2010 22:02 GMT
#23
I've lost atleast 5 PvZ with that glitch.. I found a post on the battle.net Bug Forum and a blue post said it was indeed not intended any they're looking into it. so no more will I lose to mass lings killing my economy as protoss :D
Saevus
emikochan
Profile Joined July 2009
United Kingdom232 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-10 22:04:28
March 10 2010 22:03 GMT
#24
I just wish all ground units collision was increased by about 5-10% Just enough to make walling a little more doable AND fixing the way units ball really really close together for spectators.

In wc3 you can get some nice blocks on units that are running away if you can micro your units infront of the runners, but with the tiny collision and superior pathing of sc2, they don't slow down at all..

*shrug*

edit: thanks for the post Fusionz, glad to see they are working on it
Probes need love too.
wrags
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
United States379 Posts
March 10 2010 22:16 GMT
#25
that was me in that game. if you had threatened with a higher amount of roaches (9 or more) you could have just slow pushed out or defended in your base

i know the "quarry" is with collision size, but there was a massively better transition than just blocking and trying to tech. also sim city would have helped your spire from dying. honestly i don't see how this is much different than zvz in bw, aside from the fact that it takes little to zero micro to break a ramp

i realize it's easy for me to say all this but the problem isn't with blocking so much, your decisions need to be adapted.

it's like all of these p users trying to forge expand and then complaining that "they" should make it more viable
SoLaR[i.C]
Profile Blog Joined August 2003
United States2969 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-10 22:21:14
March 10 2010 22:19 GMT
#26
I just had a strange, what I will dub "philoSCophic," thought:

Blizzard undoubtedly wanted to make SC2 better than its predecessor by creating more well defined boundaries within the game. Units have infinitely better AI and are limited in what they can and cannot do. Positions are optimized, and units are spread according to their size so you no longer have them stacking together like some sort of freakish pile of flying cards. In this case, the well defined small size of zerglings is creating a weird glitch that opposes/overcomes the well defined unit spacing of our poster.

What if, in the process of trying to tweak these hard boundaries (in this case unit collision & pathing), other anomalous things start to occur in a chain reaction as a result of creating "exceptions" in their algorithm? Is this simply something that can be changed by making zerglings "bigger?" Are we going to start seeing SC2 revert back to Broodwar after these boundaries and rules are blended together?

I'm definitely over-thinking this.
ProoM
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Lithuania1741 Posts
March 10 2010 22:22 GMT
#27
I honestly hope they increase the colision of ALL units, it's pretty ridiculous now in that aspect :S.
IMBA - International Mountain Bicycling Association.
Klive5ive
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
United Kingdom6056 Posts
March 10 2010 22:25 GMT
#28
On March 11 2010 07:22 ProoM wrote:
I honestly hope they increase the colision of ALL units, it's pretty ridiculous now in that aspect :S.

True that would fix a lot of problems. Like the ridiculous over-clumping of everything.
Don't hate the player - Hate the game
niteReloaded
Profile Blog Joined February 2007
Croatia5282 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-10 22:27:37
March 10 2010 22:26 GMT
#29
It seems that so much science from BW is not going to get adequately transfered to SC2.

I had fun testing out different building placements, making mazes and blocks against lings and zealots.
That whole aspect of game is gone. And now this?

On March 11 2010 07:25 Klive5ive wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 11 2010 07:22 ProoM wrote:
I honestly hope they increase the colision of ALL units, it's pretty ridiculous now in that aspect :S.

True that would fix a lot of problems. Like the ridiculous over-clumping of everything.

I agree too.
spinesheath
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany8679 Posts
March 10 2010 22:27 GMT
#30
To me this whole collsion size mess looks like this:

Blizzard wanted units to move more fluently, so units make themselves "thinner" if a friendly unit wants to pass. They also move out of the way but that alone wouldn't make it very smooth.

This thing somehow seems to apply to enemy units as well, even though it probably wasn't intended. The gap that opens as a concequence is large enough for a zergling to squeeze through (zerglings probably also reduce their collision size slightly while moving).

I am just assuming this, it's hard to verify without knowing the code. In any case I think it shouldn't be too hard to fix - or it might be extremely hard to fix now that I think about it. If the zerglings have a smaller collision size while moving, and their size returns to normal once they stop, they will push the roaches away for that bit. Those roaches will trigger the other roaches to make room because they "want" to move. This opens those gaps.

Well, now I went pretty far from such a vague assumption
If I am close to the real implementation, Blizzard has to make sure that enemy units can't push your units around. They probably won't let go of the "making room for friendly units" part of the AI because that's so fancy and modern (I don't like it very much, it's quite hard to form a proper arc because you keep pushing your own units around, and sometimes it still is useful to have an arc).
If you have a good reason to disagree with the above, please tell me. Thank you.
Adeeler
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
United Kingdom764 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-10 22:30:39
March 10 2010 22:28 GMT
#31
I thought the circles under a unit when selected is just a visual indicator and not an indicator of its collision size except in a general sense. Use the physical model for creating a tight wall not the circles and the wall usually holds.
I think only massive units should be able to push other units i.e. ultralisk, tank & collosus.
Floophead_III
Profile Joined September 2009
United States1832 Posts
March 10 2010 22:31 GMT
#32
You know. I think I figured out why it occurs:

Zerglings, like all units, push their friends out of the way so that they can get to their goal position. If you tell them to attack past a line of enemies, the first lings will try to squeeze into the gaps between the opposing force's units. The next line of lings will try to do the same and will push those lings just slightly. With larger units this may not have an effect, because the units simply can't squeeze into those tiny gaps in the first place, but with lings they get pushed through.

This is of course an educated guess, but I think a good way to test it would be to take different numbers of lings from 1 up to... a lot, and you just try to break through walls with them.

I wish I could test it myself, but I'm away from my desktop computer and can't run sc2 on my laptop with any degree of playability.
Half man, half bear, half pig.
McCain
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States187 Posts
March 11 2010 00:24 GMT
#33
On March 11 2010 06:30 Klockan3 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 11 2010 06:17 Chairman Ray wrote:
oh wow, until this gets fixed, Zerg might be dominant for a while

No, zerglings got such a huge nerf in sc2 from sc1, their uber pathing is the only thing going for them. What happened is that they attack almost half as fast as before so zerglings really aren't scary at all now. Before 1 zergling gave ~the same dps as a zealot, now a zealot deals twice the dps of a ling, if everything else stayed the same zerglings would be 100% useless.

I think Lings could use a buff, but making them unblockable isn't the way to do it.
Kinky
Profile Blog Joined September 2008
United States4126 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-11 00:47:13
March 11 2010 00:41 GMT
#34
Doesn't this problem only occur when you don't use hold position?

Nvm, misread the OP.
-orb-
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
United States5770 Posts
March 11 2010 00:46 GMT
#35
Yes this is a problem that's been really pissing me off too. It makes early speedling builds annoyingly hard to hold off as protoss because it's literally impossible to block your ramp with zealots against them.
'life of lively to live to life of full life thx to shield battery'
how sad that sc2 has no shield battery :(
Two_DoWn
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
United States13684 Posts
March 11 2010 00:51 GMT
#36
On March 11 2010 07:25 Klive5ive wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 11 2010 07:22 ProoM wrote:
I honestly hope they increase the colision of ALL units, it's pretty ridiculous now in that aspect :S.

True that would fix a lot of problems. Like the ridiculous over-clumping of everything.

Seriously. This. This simple change would make big battle so much easier to watch. Throw in a slight modification to coloring and all of the "oh my god wtf is going on?!?" moments will go by the way of a pvp tech build.
"What is the air speed velocity of an unladen courier?" "Dire or Radiant?"
Jyvblamo
Profile Blog Joined June 2006
Canada13788 Posts
March 11 2010 00:53 GMT
#37
Zerglings have an undocumented quantum tunneling ability in SC2.
QibingZero
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
2611 Posts
March 11 2010 01:02 GMT
#38
With moves like this mixed with early baneling wall snipes, I've lost some games way too early. When 2raxing isn't safe, there's a bit of a problem. And yeah, this is even worse when playing protoss.

BTW, props to the guy saying this isn't a problem because you deserved to lose the game anyway. That kind of posting seems to be par for the course here lately...
Oh, my eSports
geno
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States1404 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-11 01:25:49
March 11 2010 01:21 GMT
#39
This has actually been a problem for awhile. I discovered it when using Plexa's zealot walling technique a long time ago against my brother and we tested it a couple times to make sure it wasn't just bad positioning. I hesitated to make any posts about it anywhere though because most zerg players just figured hold-position unit walls would be tight (I'm protoss). I submitted a bug report when I found it though and got a blue response looking into it the next day, just before patch3 I believe. Hopefully they take it seriously because this can have some serious implications with a LOT of protoss strategies right now.

By the way, its not just a zergling thing, I've pulled it off with zealots as well. Its easier to do the more units you have and the smaller (thinner I should say) the wall. Doesn't just apply to ramps, also works against 1-matrix wide chokes. The only way right now to 100% block a choke of this type with units I've found is to put a unit wider than the choke in front or behind it and hold-position. So for instance, if you make a 1-matrix wide choke using buildings and put an archon in front or behind, no matter how much they clump up zerglings won't be able to make it through with just spamming move commands. Obviously this is not particularly helpful though. They really just need to fix hold-position walls altogether.

In the meantime, you are best off just making your wall as thick as possible to prevent this kind of stuff. For instance, putting a gateway next to a wall so you get a 3x1 matrix corridor and filling that with zealots will make it hard to break. The zerglings can eventually make it through all the zealots, but they have to do it one at a time (they only seem to jump through units when you have at least 2 to 3 clumping on top of eachother). Also, be careful if the zerg gets ling speed because that seems to make it like 20x easier to pull off to the point where zerglings can pretty much walk right through a 1-zealot thick wall.
CharlieMurphy
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
United States22895 Posts
March 11 2010 01:23 GMT
#40
On March 11 2010 09:46 -orb- wrote:
Yes this is a problem that's been really pissing me off too. It makes early speedling builds annoyingly hard to hold off as protoss because it's literally impossible to block your ramp with zealots against them.

If you place your gates in such a way to leave a small space between them , or wall them together to leave a small wall on the edge of the cliff then you can wall with 1 zeal or whatever.
..and then I would, ya know, check em'. (Aka SpoR)
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 5h 53m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech142
UpATreeSC 126
BRAT_OK 92
MindelVK 13
StarCraft: Brood War
Dewaltoss 139
Dota 2
Gorgc5881
qojqva1604
Counter-Strike
fl0m1822
adren_tv69
ptr_tv45
Other Games
Grubby3013
singsing2172
FrodaN1677
tarik_tv1119
B2W.Neo653
ceh9516
Beastyqt475
DeMusliM244
ToD152
ArmadaUGS131
KnowMe127
RotterdaM119
C9.Mang0109
Sick89
Trikslyr66
NotJumperer2
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL398
Other Games
BasetradeTV106
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• poizon28 166
• StrangeGG 64
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Migwel
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota246
League of Legends
• Nemesis5009
• TFBlade1267
• Shiphtur350
Other Games
• imaqtpie564
Upcoming Events
OSC
5h 53m
The PondCast
15h 53m
Replay Cast
1d 5h
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
OSC
2 days
SC Evo Complete
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
4 days
Wardi Open
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-02-22
LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Acropolis #4 - TS5
Jeongseon Sooper Cup
Spring Cup 2026
WardiTV Winter 2026
PiG Sty Festival 7.0
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025

Upcoming

[S:21] ASL SEASON OPEN 2nd Round
[S:21] ASL SEASON OPEN 2nd Round Qualifier
ASL Season 21: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 21: Qualifier #2
Acropolis #4 - TS6
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
RSL Revival: Season 4
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
FISSURE Playground #3
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.