| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
ROOTFayth
Canada3351 Posts
On March 02 2010 02:05 Amber[LighT] wrote: So you suggest gambling instead of playing video games? if you aim to make money, yes, poker is the only really profitable form of gambling so don't misunderstand me.... not any gambling lol | ||
|
ROOTFayth
Canada3351 Posts
On March 02 2010 02:04 Adeeler wrote: When SC2 dies(10years or so?) ppl will migrate to SC3 or WC4 or w/e RTS takes the crown at that time. Its 2010 send the wife to work and be a house-husband \o/. LOL WTF house husband hahahahah | ||
|
Adeeler
United Kingdom764 Posts
On March 02 2010 02:10 Fayth wrote: if you aim to make money, yes, poker is the only really profitable form of gambling so don't misunderstand me.... not any gambling lol The house always wins. Poker is not reliable even if you can potentially earn a lot you can potentially lose everything. Also, its just so boring to play poker all the time... | ||
|
Dr.Frost
United States389 Posts
| ||
|
Manit0u
Poland17756 Posts
| ||
|
Hehlol
22 Posts
While the answer may be incredibly clear and obvious, let's propose our THEORIES! | ||
|
SubtleArt
2710 Posts
On March 02 2010 02:12 Adeeler wrote: The house always wins. Poker is not reliable even if you can potentially earn a lot you can potentially lose everything. Also, its just so boring to play poker all the time... Stop turning this into whether or not poker is profitable. If it interests you that much go make a thread about it. Thanks | ||
|
Roman
United States2595 Posts
 | ||
|
MorroW
Sweden3522 Posts
poker isnt something that u can guarantee to succeed in but tbh if uve been a progamer in sc2 or wc3 scbw w/e i think u have talent and practice enough to make it. the games r almost the same in theory and i dont see a better way to prepare a career of poker than to practice strategy games like this when ur a kid while ur in school. obviously this sounds hilarious to most ppl but this is what i think is true :p | ||
|
ROOTFayth
Canada3351 Posts
So the proper term would be semi-pro? | ||
|
Hehlol
22 Posts
On March 02 2010 01:11 Dr.Frost wrote: I think SC2 WILL EVENTUALLY be more famous than sc2 and have a pro scene in a lot more countries. Also as a spectator, SC2 is a lot more fun to watch than sc2. I can't wait to see the builds/strata that unfold in pro matches for sc2. At least go back and edit your post... | ||
|
ROOTFayth
Canada3351 Posts
On March 02 2010 02:12 Adeeler wrote: The house always wins. Poker is not reliable even if you can potentially earn a lot you can potentially lose everything. Also, its just so boring to play poker all the time... Just as it is to play Starcraft all the time? It's a game that involves competition... You like competition or you don't I think SC1 dying is fine since SC2 will prob be huge, I mean even when I got 2nd in wcg can in 2005 it was starting to die, the foreign scene was fading away, and I don't give a flying shit about koreans, take out koreans from broodwar, and the game is pretty much dead | ||
|
Kaniol
Poland5551 Posts
On March 02 2010 01:55 Fayth wrote: I talked about being a musician cuz it also has very little potential, and you need to make it to the top to make any decent money, but music is never going to die, as opposed to SC2 Music is never going to die, just like games never will. You made wrong comparison mate | ||
|
s.a.y
Croatia3840 Posts
Why not compare CS:S and CS 1.6 with SC:BW and SC2? Because CS:S was a piece of shit from the release. It had good graphics and some solid game engine, but everything else was a fail, from esports perspective. i know Arqon (from Q3 promode) was working on a mode that would work give the game back "the feel", while SC2 already has it. Blizzard gives a damn. It's evolution, baby. | ||
|
Adeeler
United Kingdom764 Posts
On March 02 2010 02:31 Fayth wrote: Just as it is to play Starcraft all the time? It's a game that involves competition... You like competition or you don't I think SC1 dying is fine since SC2 will prob be huge, I mean even when I got 2nd in wcg can in 2005 it was starting to die, the foreign scene was fading away, and I don't give a flying shit about koreans, take out koreans from broodwar, and the game is pretty much dead SC2 will give fun competition as you'll be able to always play people of your own skill level thanks to the new ladder system. But where SC is different from poker is that you can constantly learn and become better in more realistic terms game by game where as poker being based on probability is not a game where you can force a win through shear skill and determination game by game; as luck dictates your hand(in poker) not your hand dictating your luck(in SC). | ||
|
Grumbels
Netherlands7032 Posts
| ||
|
BlasiuS
United States2405 Posts
| ||
|
Probe.
United States877 Posts
| ||
|
brocoli
Brazil264 Posts
On March 02 2010 02:18 Hehlol wrote: Hey guys why is this brand new game called Starcraft 2 killing the 11 year game called Starcraft? While the answer may be incredibly clear and obvious, let's propose our THEORIES! Hahahhaha oh lol anyways, big tournaments will turn to SC2 if the game is good. And I see no way for it to become a bad game given how the Beta is coming... also coupled with Blizzard's support + 2 planned expansions, this game will be awesome. SC1 will still survive in smaller hardcore circles though, and may even get a fair amount of Retro champs if the international progaming scene evolves. It seems to me that the two games are way too vastly different to be compared in the "superior" and "inferior" sense. | ||
|
ROOTFayth
Canada3351 Posts
I've played both at a fairly high level and I can say both requires similar qualities.. | ||
| ||
|
|
Replay Cast
WardiTV Spring Champion…
OSC
Maestros of the Game
Serral vs Percival
SHIN vs ShoWTimE
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
Maestros of the Game
Clem vs Lambo
Zoun vs SKillous
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
Solar vs Classic
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
