• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 21:46
CEST 03:46
KST 10:46
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 20252Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202576RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18
Community News
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced17BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8
StarCraft 2
General
#1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 What tournaments are world championships? Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 2025 I offer completely free coaching services
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced $5,000 WardiTV Summer Championship 2025 WardiTV Mondays FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced BW General Discussion Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Dewalt's Show Matches in China
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers [G] Mineral Boosting Does 1 second matter in StarCraft?
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
UK Politics Mega-thread US Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 633 users

The warhound - a deathball unit, not a "mech" unit - Page 19

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 HotS
Post a Reply
Prev 1 17 18 19 20 Next All
Danzo
Profile Joined March 2011
2820 Posts
September 08 2012 08:42 GMT
#361
On September 08 2012 17:36 Snowbear wrote:
When I look at Blizzard's sc2 past, I can conclude that they are too proud to change the warhound. MAYBE if we are lucky we get a new spell on it, but they will never rework it completely.


Warhound is a marketable 'casual' unit that's not hard to use and will be enjoyed in mass numbers for low level players.
That's the bottom line about sc2 thus far.
Getting too old for this..
Fjodorov
Profile Joined December 2011
5007 Posts
September 08 2012 08:44 GMT
#362
What is this "A-move" unit? From what ive seen the Warhound is pretty fast, thus being highly microable. I dont get it...
NormandyBoy
Profile Joined May 2010
France200 Posts
September 08 2012 08:46 GMT
#363
I think everyone is harsh on the Warhound, it is the unit that allowed 3 match-ups we had never sever seen before :
- Protoss VS Warhound
- Zerg VS Warhound
- and the infamous Warhound VS Warhound
Alex1Sun
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
494 Posts
September 08 2012 09:17 GMT
#364
On September 08 2012 17:36 Snowbear wrote:
When I look at Blizzard's sc2 past, I can conclude that they are too proud to change the warhound. MAYBE if we are lucky we get a new spell on it, but they will never rework it completely.

I guess it doesn't need to be reworked. Simply nerf it until it remains good only against certain compositions, so that it becomes a reactionary unit that is only built sometimes to support tanks. And tanks are awesome!
This is not Warcraft in space!
Alex1Sun
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
494 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-08 11:53:13
September 08 2012 09:33 GMT
#365
On September 08 2012 17:44 Fjodorov wrote:
What is this "A-move" unit? From what ive seen the Warhound is pretty fast, thus being highly microable. I dont get it...

Even if people start microing warhounds, the micro will be just like with bio, but simpler and less exciting (since with bio you have to control very squishy units, and warhounds are very buff). Even more importantly, If warhounds replace tanks, it just kills the diversity for spectators, since tank based positional games look very different from bio micro, and tanks are not going to be built because of warhounds

IMHO warhounds have to be nerfed hard, so that people prefer to build tanks over warhounds most of the time if they decide to go mech.
This is not Warcraft in space!
thOr6136
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Slovenia1775 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-08 10:01:38
September 08 2012 10:00 GMT
#366
Btw, protoss players i think they should be fighting warhounds with immortals in warp prisms, if you can dodge their rockets and basic attack - and i think you can - then immortals get pretty effective am i right? Someone should test it how it does.
HomeWorld
Profile Joined December 2011
Romania903 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-08 10:34:15
September 08 2012 10:30 GMT
#367
Lets just see how warhounds fares after that "dps nerf - slower attack speed". From what I've learned watching Thorzain stream (straight almost 14 hours <3 Thorzain ), having some warhounds early-mid game helps but in the late game as I've seen, the most effective unit is the Raven (less energy expensive hunter seeker missile) + basic late game composition - tanks/thors/hellions/etc if going mech (TvZ). As for TvP (having enough warhound numbers) the usage of warhounds can have a big impact due to haywire missiles and its inherent high alpha damage output (same goes for TvT if the opponent is meching also). Still, I have to see more "good" TvP matches to make a better idea about how good (or way too good) is the new unit (warhound).

All in all, it's too early to judge a new unit after only 3 days of beta. I'm pretty sure that there will be several ways to efficiently counter it (warhound), we just need to wait a little. People will figure it out quite fast.
mDuo13
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States307 Posts
September 08 2012 10:52 GMT
#368
Unfortunately, I have to agree with everyone here who hates the Warhound. I'm a bad player, and even I would rather see more skill-intensive units. If they drop it entirely... well, I dunno, I guess Terran would need something else or it would be be pretty boring in HotS. Having racecars transform into Firebats is cool and all, and you know, Totally-Not-Spider-Mines™ seem neat if they can balance them... but the Warhound is blegh. They could put Predators in multiplayer... not because Terran needs another fast ground-to-ground splash damage unit, but because it's a fucking robot panther.

Making the Warhound transform into a turret is a good idea. But I think Blizzard can do better, as long as they aren't too proud to try.
Rassy
Profile Joined August 2010
Netherlands2308 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-08 21:27:26
September 08 2012 21:14 GMT
#369
Protoss against warhound+marine can maybe try zealot+phoenix+centry
Phoenix can take out/lift warhound and its less suply, they also easily beat viking.
Zealot+few centry beat marine.
Phoenix chrono can also build faster then warhound.
Terran need get thor but that comes alot later and by then toss can go high templar ,tempest or something else.
Or is this silly idea?:p
singul4rity
Profile Joined September 2011
United States54 Posts
September 08 2012 21:25 GMT
#370
Making mech viable means the units have to be good. Not sure why everyone hates there being a Mech unit that is actually usable vs. Protoss...
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Serpico
Profile Joined May 2010
4285 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-08 22:10:34
September 08 2012 22:08 GMT
#371
On September 09 2012 06:25 singul4rity wrote:
Making mech viable means the units have to be good. Not sure why everyone hates there being a Mech unit that is actually usable vs. Protoss...

That's not even close to the reason why. It's a unit that wastes a slot in the game for something more interesting and lowers the level of excitement and interest in SC 2 overall. Any unit with really high numbers for health/speed/dmg etc can be really good and "microable." It then becomes generic and boring though, which is what you don't want for attracting more players and having interesting gameplay. Even the model looks like a generic mech thing that could have come out of any universe, which is an issue as it has no specific style to it either visually.
BaDMannerS
Profile Joined July 2012
Bulgaria57 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-08 22:36:07
September 08 2012 22:34 GMT
#372
Not sure if it is posted here, although everyone knows it :D


Can you image that Blizzard haven't even made this super simple, a few hours test before even releasing this nightmarreish imbaunit in alpha version :D

What kind of people are working there lately? David Kim must be using hard the last couple of months and here is the result :D
Yoshi Kirishima
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States10338 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-08 22:56:29
September 08 2012 22:55 GMT
#373
1 simple nerf they can do to the warhound; just make it smaller! it is quite a big mech right now, if it's smaller then colossi would be better against it, which makes sense because then, even though you still COULD go heavy warhounds, as the game goes on longer and longer, there'll be more and more incentive to get tanks/viking to deal with colossi/HT etc etc

i mean seriously, those warhounds are huge mechs...

it would also help tanks vs warhounds, and would fit the way mech/tanks scale into lategame (bigger deathball = exponentially more powerful), since there would be more splash damage, while warhounds would still do well vs small tank-based mech armies


well there are many nerfs they can do, but I think a size change would be a decent idea

I hope it says as a 2 supply unit though instead of 3 -- i would rather it stay as 2 and be weakened. But either way is fine I guess.

Watching that video with the unit fights... HOLY SHIT 100 supply of warhounds is a HUGE FUCKING ARMY like holy crap! Imagine a 150 supply army... or even 165 (in late late game scenarios where Terran has like 20 OCs and 35 scvs mainly for gas)


Interesting, at least the tanks beat it xD
Mid-master streaming MECH ONLY + commentary www.twitch.tv/yoshikirishima +++ "If all-in fails, all-in again."
Belisarius
Profile Joined November 2010
Australia6230 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-08 23:15:08
September 08 2012 23:14 GMT
#374
On September 09 2012 07:34 BaDMannerS wrote:
Not sure if it is posted here, although everyone knows it :D
+ Show Spoiler +
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8VKon9F-zM&feature=player_embedded%23!&ytsession=OS5gNrPCWVfgguLkQdAstcPDa9pg26PFmXkKPUiqQVnKSTfVNCO9MWVnyrInS-whq-xFJipyvrKZ4ErBpHgBj_QbQqIY-32dT_lhOus4YAjBVbWafc-1j5PAbaWf81Vk42zX7hQcSfpuEh6kcLgsxAasIJPuXagDvOqm4gx3vrHfGtinUWwBh0RKl4AR7KPvsHyRH7Ut9B67X_1nUlA9yAHWlnoR8i2ilyrC3tgWURnatNMOuS43muEAOnnFqu7qfGgbVemGQpH-Rkglp9wbazYu9tfqNZUwKvtQY-gzAPq2_xLPXaDdGbaWMwwXO_4lsXSu8VfCUaF7r9Mwt--GDS2GNFYdlHmSw7RVGtYyVHDcFvcS0lzqBxk6dr6v6Is_xD9AMHYQAWmEiTE7TfYsiBmm7AKzlg2ZFIjgQ7weMiEIMEoM_tvFzlTL1GX-AnqJSpR0EW8pyVFJXOLOqn104XPiYOo6g5GivezbT3EziE1nlZBw3pItIhgw_goBQBwXPLhnfNDFfxsLf5-Q4oC9cEZde9OGukXV


Can you image that Blizzard haven't even made this super simple, a few hours test before even releasing this nightmarreish imbaunit in alpha version :D

What kind of people are working there lately? David Kim must be using hard the last couple of months and here is the result :D


Bahahahahahahahahahahaah

Oh wow. What. Screw that unit.
Odinsphere
Profile Joined July 2010
United States57 Posts
September 09 2012 02:06 GMT
#375
On September 08 2012 12:57 Wombat_NI wrote:

I'm not actually 100% sure what you're asking, so if I'm wrong apologies. Why nerf/tweak a unit that is broken from a design perspective in the first place? People, myself included were hating the unit long, long before the Beta actually started with the subsequent Warhound dominance. As this guy put it:
The Famous 'In Defence of Mech' Post

Ever since it was revealed people have loathed the unit, close to en-masse. I don't think even the Collosus has been as universally disliked by this community. 'A-move units', even if statistically balanced also tend to not scale well with good control either. Units like the Collosus, Warhound et al do not appreciably improve in the hands of a pro over the hands of a scrub. Other stock units are ostensibly A-move units (in that they don't have special abilities, but they have a good bit of micro potential, be they the marine, the stalker in early game (or later with blink) mutalisks, even banes.

All this as well after the public desire was made by the development team claimed to want to break up deathballs, but instead have just given Terran one. It's really not people flying off the handle over nothing.

Mech to be viable in TvP doesn't even really need its own anti-mech unit to kill immortals, being that it's upgraded chargelots that are the primary cause of pain. Battle hellions/tanks deal with those chargelot-centric compositions pretty well.


Fair enough. I haven't been keeping on the hots updates besides the battle reports and the unit introductions. I didn't know it was hated before the beta came out. I really like that post on how it doesn't seem to scale with skill, as I've never really thought about it. I was just asking if some of these proposed changes were because the unit is(was?) clearly broken as far as stats go. Anti mech counter to immortals sounds like an oxymoron, lol. I was asking my bud about how that aspect was supposed to work. Thanks for not being an ass about it. That I can appreciate.
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland25245 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-09 02:35:19
September 09 2012 02:33 GMT
#376
On September 09 2012 11:06 Odinsphere wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 08 2012 12:57 Wombat_NI wrote:

I'm not actually 100% sure what you're asking, so if I'm wrong apologies. Why nerf/tweak a unit that is broken from a design perspective in the first place? People, myself included were hating the unit long, long before the Beta actually started with the subsequent Warhound dominance. As this guy put it:
The Famous 'In Defence of Mech' Post

Ever since it was revealed people have loathed the unit, close to en-masse. I don't think even the Collosus has been as universally disliked by this community. 'A-move units', even if statistically balanced also tend to not scale well with good control either. Units like the Collosus, Warhound et al do not appreciably improve in the hands of a pro over the hands of a scrub. Other stock units are ostensibly A-move units (in that they don't have special abilities, but they have a good bit of micro potential, be they the marine, the stalker in early game (or later with blink) mutalisks, even banes.

All this as well after the public desire was made by the development team claimed to want to break up deathballs, but instead have just given Terran one. It's really not people flying off the handle over nothing.

Mech to be viable in TvP doesn't even really need its own anti-mech unit to kill immortals, being that it's upgraded chargelots that are the primary cause of pain. Battle hellions/tanks deal with those chargelot-centric compositions pretty well.


Fair enough. I haven't been keeping on the hots updates besides the battle reports and the unit introductions. I didn't know it was hated before the beta came out. I really like that post on how it doesn't seem to scale with skill, as I've never really thought about it. I was just asking if some of these proposed changes were because the unit is(was?) clearly broken as far as stats go. Anti mech counter to immortals sounds like an oxymoron, lol. I was asking my bud about how that aspect was supposed to work. Thanks for not being an ass about it. That I can appreciate.

In a nutshell what I want/advocate are units that are good at different levels of skill, but have a noticeable difference in effectiveness in the hands of a pro compared to an average ladder player.

You can watch MKP's marines and get excited, or marvel at Hero's lategame warp prism useage. Nobody really gets out of their seat for 'MC's sick collosus control' because beyond basic competence there's not much more mileage they can get out of those kind of units.

Either make units that scale with micro (and I'm talking basic units here, not spellcasters), or create units that dovetail well with others, a la Templar/Warp Prism drops. These kind of things are all units that players of all level can appreciate, but are more impressive the higher up players go in skill.

This kind of design is not exclusive to BW by any stretch, lots of these interesting unit interactions do exist in SC2 and Blizzard gets a fair bit right. I just wish to see them build on the good stuff they put in, rather than replace it with bad stuff (as I perceive it)
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
Alex1Sun
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
494 Posts
September 09 2012 03:34 GMT
#377
On September 09 2012 07:34 BaDMannerS wrote:
Not sure if it is posted here, although everyone knows it :D
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8VKon9F-zM&feature=player_embedded#!&ytsession=OS5gNrPCWVfgguLkQdAstcPDa9pg26PFmXkKPUiqQVnKSTfVNCO9MWVnyrInS-whq-xFJipyvrKZ4ErBpHgBj_QbQqIY-32dT_lhOus4YAjBVbWafc-1j5PAbaWf81Vk42zX7hQcSfpuEh6kcLgsxAasIJPuXagDvOqm4gx3vrHfGtinUWwBh0RKl4AR7KPvsHyRH7Ut9B67X_1nUlA9yAHWlnoR8i2ilyrC3tgWURnatNMOuS43muEAOnnFqu7qfGgbVemGQpH-Rkglp9wbazYu9tfqNZUwKvtQY-gzAPq2_xLPXaDdGbaWMwwXO_4lsXSu8VfCUaF7r9Mwt--GDS2GNFYdlHmSw7RVGtYyVHDcFvcS0lzqBxk6dr6v6Is_xD9AMHYQAWmEiTE7TfYsiBmm7AKzlg2ZFIjgQ7weMiEIMEoM_tvFzlTL1GX-AnqJSpR0EW8pyVFJXOLOqn104XPiYOo6g5GivezbT3EziE1nlZBw3pItIhgw_goBQBwXPLhnfNDFfxsLf5-Q4oC9cEZde9OGukXV

Can you image that Blizzard haven't even made this super simple, a few hours test before even releasing this nightmarreish imbaunit in alpha version :D

What kind of people are working there lately? David Kim must be using hard the last couple of months and here is the result :D

Wow! Just wow! That's total BS.

However I believe that it wouldn't be enough just to moderately nerf warhounds. Even if they become balanced, they are still uninspiring a-move units, that are very boring to watch compared to tank positional micro.
This is not Warcraft in space!
GTR
Profile Blog Joined September 2004
51447 Posts
September 09 2012 04:33 GMT
#378
Am I the only one who thinks that the health of the Warhound should have been nerfed before anything else? 220HP for a 150/75 unit is quite ridiculous. Maybe chuck it down to 160 or something.
Commentator
cerebralz
Profile Joined August 2009
United States443 Posts
September 09 2012 04:46 GMT
#379
Well, i really don't take the unit tester for face value because the warhound will most always beat other units without micro because of it's range.

If you watch the video however, it's pretty clear that 3 things break the balance vs. current units.
1) The size. The size of the warhound makes it split all splash damage to a degree where splash units aside from sieged tanks and banelings are not cost effective. \

2) The range. imo the range of the "normal" attack should be much shorter, like range 4 and should be more marine-like rapid bursts of small damage.

3) The attack speed. We will see how the patch fixes this part. I was expecting the warhounds to get mowed down by bio, but of course in the video there are no medivacs, micro, or stimming more than 1x.

FakeDeath
Profile Joined January 2011
Malaysia6060 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-09 05:04:35
September 09 2012 04:54 GMT
#380
On September 09 2012 13:46 cerebralz wrote:
Well, i really don't take the unit tester for face value because the warhound will most always beat other units without micro because of it's range.

If you watch the video however, it's pretty clear that 3 things break the balance vs. current units.
1) The size. The size of the warhound makes it split all splash damage to a degree where splash units aside from sieged tanks and banelings are not cost effective. \

2) The range. imo the range of the "normal" attack should be much shorter, like range 4 and should be more marine-like rapid bursts of small damage.

3) The attack speed. We will see how the patch fixes this part. I was expecting the warhounds to get mowed down by bio, but of course in the video there are no medivacs, micro, or stimming more than 1x.



Their range/movement speed/HP is a fucking problem.
They got tons of HP 220 for a 2 supply is ridiculous.
They are almost as fast a Stalker.
Long range on their missile(9 range).

Their DPS is still strong but not as overpowered as before.

Now it is time to tweak their HP and movement speed.

Worst of all, THEY ARE ONLY 2 SUPPLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Those thing should be 3 supply.


This is like when roaches were on 1 supply but got nerfed to 2 supply.
Play your best
Prev 1 17 18 19 20 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 7h 14m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 263
RuFF_SC2 97
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 4839
NaDa 65
HiyA 54
Sexy 40
Noble 26
Icarus 8
sSak 7
Dota 2
monkeys_forever1323
LuMiX0
Counter-Strike
fl0m2409
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox1201
Mew2King388
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor193
Other Games
summit1g12068
tarik_tv10476
JimRising 1462
shahzam591
ViBE222
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1749
BasetradeTV118
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 11 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 57
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Upcoming Events
FEL
7h 14m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
12h 14m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
16h 14m
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
Online Event
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
6 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
BSL Team Wars
FEL Cracov 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.