EPTGM pushing EV truck with a “go green” “blah blah” attitude was interesting. I wonder who from Marketing suggested/approved it.
2023 NFL/CFB Season - Page 42
| Forum Index > Sports |
|
Emnjay808
United States10638 Posts
GM pushing EV truck with a “go green” “blah blah” attitude was interesting. I wonder who from Marketing suggested/approved it. | ||
|
Melliflue
United Kingdom1389 Posts
On February 14 2022 23:55 JimmiC wrote: Good assessment. It will also be interesting to see the Rams next year. They have Weddle (added late starting safety) and Whitworth (starting LT) retiring for sure. Donald is talking about it, McVay is talking about it. OBJ likely not ready, if signed, for at least most of the year. Will woods be back and if so full speed? No picks and no cap space! Now there is always things they can do and there strat of trading picks for proven worked. It will be interesting to see if they can sustain it or if it crashes them in a year or two. The NFC looks very weak next season. Brady's retirement scuppers the Bucs. The Packers over-achieved and Rodgers is unhappy. The 49ers are likely to start Trey Lance and we don't know how good he will be. Maybe the Cowboys or Cardinals will win a play-off game next season. So many of the good, young quarterbacks are in the AFC, so even a weakened Rams team could be favourites for the NFC. | ||
Shellshock
United States97274 Posts
| ||
|
StasisField
United States1086 Posts
On February 15 2022 07:22 Shellshock wrote: Cardinals ramping up to be an off-season dumpster fire Please Kyler just get over the playoff loss and move on.. | ||
|
farvacola
United States18818 Posts
| ||
|
JimmyJRaynor
Canada16407 Posts
https://i.imgur.com/yl75TQd.jpg https://i.imgur.com/1f0kfpJ.jpg Man what cool strategies... "pull the guards" ... "double tight end".... all these cool terms and tactical team maneuvers! I could even execute these plays in the Super Tecmo Bowl video game because you could create your own plays. Super Fun Times! Welp, its 2022 and the #1 article on the ESPN site features a 5,000 word analysis along with this detailed diagram outlining all kinds of various strategic movements. https://i.imgur.com/uJJZdgr.jpg https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/33231841/dallas-cowboys-paid-24-million-settle-cheerleaders-voyeurism-allegations SMH | ||
|
Emnjay808
United States10638 Posts
I’m curious what peoples thoughts are on this? Apparently he didn’t bet on games he was playing. (Barring any official NFL rules) I think a line has to be drawn somewhere, though. What do you guys think? | ||
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
|
ZerOCoolSC2
8927 Posts
On March 08 2022 09:06 JimmiC wrote: There is rules about it and its under more scrunity because its becoming legal and it means so much money for prosports. The powers that be care more about this them just about anything, just look at pete rose. He could bet on anything else, what a dummy he was inline to makes 100s of millions on his career. Now hes trying to compete with AB for giving up the most earnings by stupid chocies. If he was betting on other games, then I don't see the problem. He can't influence the outcome any more than the refs. Also, Pete Rose was betting on his games. That's the difference unless Ridley did something similar. But still, with it becoming legal across the nation to a degree, I don't think he should be suspended. Maybe fined. Banning players from betting on games they aren't playing in/for teams they're not on makes no sense. I'm sure he'll appeal the suspension. Now, if it comes out that he was having family members place bets for him against his team, then yeah, that could be something else entirely. | ||
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
|
ZerOCoolSC2
8927 Posts
On March 08 2022 09:24 JimmiC wrote: The NFL makes it very clear you can't bet on NFL games. https://nflcommunications.com/Documents/2018 Policies/2018 Gambling Policy - FINAL.pdf It's a stupid policy but it is policy. Still don't think a suspension is warranted. A fine for the amount won + some would be fair imo. Donate the winnings to charity or something. But whatever. | ||
|
cLutZ
United States19573 Posts
On March 08 2022 09:27 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote: It's a stupid policy but it is policy. Still don't think a suspension is warranted. A fine for the amount won + some would be fair imo. Donate the winnings to charity or something. But whatever. It is not a stupid policy. You don't want to just avoid corruption and matchfixing, you want to avoid the appearance of anything sort of looking like corruption and matchfixing. Which is why the rule is the rule. | ||
|
andrewlt
United States7702 Posts
On March 08 2022 09:34 cLutZ wrote: It is not a stupid policy. You don't want to just avoid corruption and matchfixing, you want to avoid the appearance of anything sort of looking like corruption and matchfixing. Which is why the rule is the rule. This pretty much. In order for sports gambling to work, the leagues have to avoid even the hint of impropriety. A blanket ban is clearer and easier to enforce. | ||
|
UsedEgg3
126 Posts
| ||
GTR
51333 Posts
| ||
|
cLutZ
United States19573 Posts
Because that is what gambling is. We are literally on a forum where the scene was basically destroyed by matchfixing once. I don't even remember what Garret allegedly did, but if it is so bad why isn't he in prison like Henry Ruggs is going to be? Gambling is an area where sports leagues should have higher standards than society. As an example, I was a government contractor, and we were only allowed to bring in really cheap sandwiches and drinks to our meetings with the gov employees, the point being to avoid any implication of bribery.. Gambling is the ultimate double edged sword. Criminal cases are a lose-lose for sports leagues. Which is why both leagues and unions will be best served, eventually, with CBA rules requiring indictments and court filings as part of the process. | ||
|
UsedEgg3
126 Posts
| ||
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
|
Shellshock
United States97274 Posts
| ||
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
| ||
