• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 18:25
CEST 00:25
KST 07:25
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced!1[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Holding On9Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4)5TL.net Map Contest #21 - Finalists4Team TLMC #5: Vote to Decide Ladder Maps!0
Community News
5.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8)51Weekly Cups (Sept 29-Oct 5): MaxPax triples up3PartinG joins SteamerZone, returns to SC2 competition245.0.15 Balance Patch Notes (Live version)119$2,500 WardiTV TL Map Contest Tournament 154
StarCraft 2
General
5.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8) 5.0.15 Balance Patch Notes (Live version) The New Patch Killed Mech! Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced! Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon
Tourneys
SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 19 RSL Offline Finals Dates + Ticket Sales! SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $2,500 WardiTV TL Map Contest Tournament 15
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 494 Unstable Environment Mutation # 493 Quick Killers Mutation # 492 Get Out More Mutation # 491 Night Drive
Brood War
General
ASL20 General Discussion Whose hotkey signature is this? BW General Discussion Question regarding recent ASL Bisu vs Larva game [BSL21] - How to Qualify to Each League ?
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL20] Ro8 Day 4 Small VOD Thread 2.0 [ASL20] Ro8 Day 3
Strategy
Current Meta TvZ Theorycraft - Improving on State of the Art Proposed Glossary of Strategic Uncertainty 9 hatch vs 10 hatch vs 12 hatch
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread ZeroSpace Megathread Dawn of War IV Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640} TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread UK Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2026 Football Thread MLB/Baseball 2023 NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts The Automated Ban List BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final
Blogs
From Tilt to Ragequit:The Ps…
TrAiDoS
What your "aura" says about…
Peanutsc
Try to reverse getting fired …
Garnet
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1217 users

ASUS ROG 2020 Announced, Nov 27-29 - Page 5

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments
1049 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 51 52 53 Next
dbRic1203
Profile Joined July 2019
Germany2655 Posts
November 23 2020 17:48 GMT
#81
On November 24 2020 02:11 Elche wrote:
Thank god Elazer didn't qualify, not that dislike Elazer but it would have been so unfair to the guys eliminated in the EU quali LB.

Why?
They all could have tried in the NA one as well. Actually many of them did. If they didn t it was their choice.
MaxPax
Elche
Profile Joined June 2011
Finland170 Posts
November 23 2020 20:56 GMT
#82
On November 24 2020 02:48 dbRic1203 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 24 2020 02:11 Elche wrote:
Thank god Elazer didn't qualify, not that dislike Elazer but it would have been so unfair to the guys eliminated in the EU quali LB.

Why?
They all could have tried in the NA one as well. Actually many of them did. If they didn t it was their choice.


Apparently they ran the LB from a round too early and three of the contenders for the last qualifying spots were knocked out by players that should have been out already.

AzAlexZ
Profile Joined September 2016
Australia3303 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-11-23 21:16:32
November 23 2020 21:15 GMT
#83
On November 24 2020 05:56 Elche wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 24 2020 02:48 dbRic1203 wrote:
On November 24 2020 02:11 Elche wrote:
Thank god Elazer didn't qualify, not that dislike Elazer but it would have been so unfair to the guys eliminated in the EU quali LB.

Why?
They all could have tried in the NA one as well. Actually many of them did. If they didn t it was their choice.


Apparently they ran the LB from a round too early and three of the contenders for the last qualifying spots were knocked out by players that should have been out already.


what do you mean 'should have been out'?
Your logic is confusing
Faker is the GOAT!
Elentos
Profile Blog Joined February 2015
55555 Posts
November 23 2020 21:51 GMT
#84
On November 24 2020 06:15 AzAlexZ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 24 2020 05:56 Elche wrote:
On November 24 2020 02:48 dbRic1203 wrote:
On November 24 2020 02:11 Elche wrote:
Thank god Elazer didn't qualify, not that dislike Elazer but it would have been so unfair to the guys eliminated in the EU quali LB.

Why?
They all could have tried in the NA one as well. Actually many of them did. If they didn t it was their choice.


Apparently they ran the LB from a round too early and three of the contenders for the last qualifying spots were knocked out by players that should have been out already.


what do you mean 'should have been out'?
Your logic is confusing

The format for the EU qualifier was supposed to be double elimination starting from the Ro16. This was for some reason changed while the qualifier was already going on (which is the hallmark of all great tournaments really). Elazer lost in the Ro32 so he would not originally have had a chance to play in the loser bracket.
Every 60 seconds in Africa, a minute passes.
mikedupp
Profile Joined May 2020
233 Posts
November 23 2020 22:12 GMT
#85
On November 24 2020 06:51 Elentos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 24 2020 06:15 AzAlexZ wrote:
On November 24 2020 05:56 Elche wrote:
On November 24 2020 02:48 dbRic1203 wrote:
On November 24 2020 02:11 Elche wrote:
Thank god Elazer didn't qualify, not that dislike Elazer but it would have been so unfair to the guys eliminated in the EU quali LB.

Why?
They all could have tried in the NA one as well. Actually many of them did. If they didn t it was their choice.


Apparently they ran the LB from a round too early and three of the contenders for the last qualifying spots were knocked out by players that should have been out already.


what do you mean 'should have been out'?
Your logic is confusing

The format for the EU qualifier was supposed to be double elimination starting from the Ro16. This was for some reason changed while the qualifier was already going on (which is the hallmark of all great tournaments really). Elazer lost in the Ro32 so he would not originally have had a chance to play in the loser bracket.



Still not understanding the "knocked out by players that should have been out already"
Back2Back
Profile Joined August 2020
24 Posts
November 23 2020 22:55 GMT
#86
On November 24 2020 07:12 mikedupp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 24 2020 06:51 Elentos wrote:
On November 24 2020 06:15 AzAlexZ wrote:
On November 24 2020 05:56 Elche wrote:
On November 24 2020 02:48 dbRic1203 wrote:
On November 24 2020 02:11 Elche wrote:
Thank god Elazer didn't qualify, not that dislike Elazer but it would have been so unfair to the guys eliminated in the EU quali LB.

Why?
They all could have tried in the NA one as well. Actually many of them did. If they didn t it was their choice.


Apparently they ran the LB from a round too early and three of the contenders for the last qualifying spots were knocked out by players that should have been out already.


what do you mean 'should have been out'?
Your logic is confusing

The format for the EU qualifier was supposed to be double elimination starting from the Ro16. This was for some reason changed while the qualifier was already going on (which is the hallmark of all great tournaments really). Elazer lost in the Ro32 so he would not originally have had a chance to play in the loser bracket.



Still not understanding the "knocked out by players that should have been out already"


I believe it goes like this:

In Korea and America the lower bracket started from Ro16. Meaning you get a second 'life' starting from Ro16 and onward. But for some reason they changed the European one to start from Ro32.

So if you had been defeated in Ro32 in America you would have been eliminated from the tournament. While for some reason in Europe people who got beat in the round of 32 went to the lower bracket instead and got another chance.

That gave people who made it too Ro16 and then got eliminated by someone from the Ro32 a bit salty because according to the tournament rules those people should not have had been in a lower bracket.
dbRic1203
Profile Joined July 2019
Germany2655 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-11-24 08:45:30
November 24 2020 07:37 GMT
#87
On November 24 2020 07:55 Back2Back wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 24 2020 07:12 mikedupp wrote:
On November 24 2020 06:51 Elentos wrote:
On November 24 2020 06:15 AzAlexZ wrote:
On November 24 2020 05:56 Elche wrote:
On November 24 2020 02:48 dbRic1203 wrote:
On November 24 2020 02:11 Elche wrote:
Thank god Elazer didn't qualify, not that dislike Elazer but it would have been so unfair to the guys eliminated in the EU quali LB.

Why?
They all could have tried in the NA one as well. Actually many of them did. If they didn t it was their choice.


Apparently they ran the LB from a round too early and three of the contenders for the last qualifying spots were knocked out by players that should have been out already.


what do you mean 'should have been out'?
Your logic is confusing

The format for the EU qualifier was supposed to be double elimination starting from the Ro16. This was for some reason changed while the qualifier was already going on (which is the hallmark of all great tournaments really). Elazer lost in the Ro32 so he would not originally have had a chance to play in the loser bracket.



Still not understanding the "knocked out by players that should have been out already"


I believe it goes like this:

In Korea and America the lower bracket started from Ro16. Meaning you get a second 'life' starting from Ro16 and onward. But for some reason they changed the European one to start from Ro32.

So if you had been defeated in Ro32 in America you would have been eliminated from the tournament. While for some reason in Europe people who got beat in the round of 32 went to the lower bracket instead and got another chance.

That gave people who made it too Ro16 and then got eliminated by someone from the Ro32 a bit salty because according to the tournament rules those people should not have had been in a lower bracket.

But that didn t even affect the endresult. Harstem qualified in the end from the lower breaket in EU. Elazer qualified in NA

Still changing Rules mid tournament is dumb and shouldn t happen
MaxPax
Elche
Profile Joined June 2011
Finland170 Posts
November 24 2020 08:04 GMT
#88
On November 24 2020 16:37 dbRic1203 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 24 2020 07:55 Back2Back wrote:
On November 24 2020 07:12 mikedupp wrote:
On November 24 2020 06:51 Elentos wrote:
On November 24 2020 06:15 AzAlexZ wrote:
On November 24 2020 05:56 Elche wrote:
On November 24 2020 02:48 dbRic1203 wrote:
On November 24 2020 02:11 Elche wrote:
Thank god Elazer didn't qualify, not that dislike Elazer but it would have been so unfair to the guys eliminated in the EU quali LB.

Why?
They all could have tried in the NA one as well. Actually many of them did. If they didn t it was their choice.


Apparently they ran the LB from a round too early and three of the contenders for the last qualifying spots were knocked out by players that should have been out already.


what do you mean 'should have been out'?
Your logic is confusing

The format for the EU qualifier was supposed to be double elimination starting from the Ro16. This was for some reason changed while the qualifier was already going on (which is the hallmark of all great tournaments really). Elazer lost in the Ro32 so he would not originally have had a chance to play in the loser bracket.



Still not understanding the "knocked out by players that should have been out already"


I believe it goes like this:

In Korea and America the lower bracket started from Ro16. Meaning you get a second 'life' starting from Ro16 and onward. But for some reason they changed the European one to start from Ro32.

So if you had been defeated in Ro32 in America you would have been eliminated from the tournament. While for some reason in Europe people who got beat in the round of 32 went to the lower bracket instead and got another chance.

That gave people who made it too Ro16 and then got eliminated by someone from the Ro32 a bit salty because according to the tournament rules those people should not have had been in a lower bracket.

But that didn t even affect the endresult. Harstem qualified in the end from the lower breaket in EU. Elazer qualified in NA

Still changing Rules mid tournament is dumb and shouldn t happen


Elazer didn't qualify.
No veritable damage was done but had Elazer qualified it would have essentially locked in the Top7 from EU.
Kafka777
Profile Joined December 2015
361 Posts
November 24 2020 08:29 GMT
#89
On November 24 2020 17:04 Elche wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 24 2020 16:37 dbRic1203 wrote:
On November 24 2020 07:55 Back2Back wrote:
On November 24 2020 07:12 mikedupp wrote:
On November 24 2020 06:51 Elentos wrote:
On November 24 2020 06:15 AzAlexZ wrote:
On November 24 2020 05:56 Elche wrote:
On November 24 2020 02:48 dbRic1203 wrote:
On November 24 2020 02:11 Elche wrote:
Thank god Elazer didn't qualify, not that dislike Elazer but it would have been so unfair to the guys eliminated in the EU quali LB.

Why?
They all could have tried in the NA one as well. Actually many of them did. If they didn t it was their choice.


Apparently they ran the LB from a round too early and three of the contenders for the last qualifying spots were knocked out by players that should have been out already.


what do you mean 'should have been out'?
Your logic is confusing

The format for the EU qualifier was supposed to be double elimination starting from the Ro16. This was for some reason changed while the qualifier was already going on (which is the hallmark of all great tournaments really). Elazer lost in the Ro32 so he would not originally have had a chance to play in the loser bracket.



Still not understanding the "knocked out by players that should have been out already"


I believe it goes like this:

In Korea and America the lower bracket started from Ro16. Meaning you get a second 'life' starting from Ro16 and onward. But for some reason they changed the European one to start from Ro32.

So if you had been defeated in Ro32 in America you would have been eliminated from the tournament. While for some reason in Europe people who got beat in the round of 32 went to the lower bracket instead and got another chance.

That gave people who made it too Ro16 and then got eliminated by someone from the Ro32 a bit salty because according to the tournament rules those people should not have had been in a lower bracket.

But that didn t even affect the endresult. Harstem qualified in the end from the lower breaket in EU. Elazer qualified in NA

Still changing Rules mid tournament is dumb and shouldn t happen


Elazer didn't qualify.
No veritable damage was done but had Elazer qualified it would have essentially locked in the Top7 from EU.


Had he qualified it would still be fair and square for everyone and no damage could have been done.

deacon.frost
Profile Joined February 2013
Czech Republic12129 Posts
November 24 2020 11:13 GMT
#90
On November 22 2020 00:26 dbRic1203 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 21 2020 23:38 deacon.frost wrote:
On November 21 2020 21:04 dbRic1203 wrote:
On November 21 2020 20:27 deacon.frost wrote:
On November 21 2020 19:23 dbRic1203 wrote:
Korean online qualifiers and walkovers in the lower breaket.
Name a more iconic duo
Even now, where the Koreans stream into the EPT Open Cups, we see multiple Walkovers there
At least it seems to be less Bad as in previous events..

JAGW teamkill. While Cure & Trap aren't on the same team anymore, the curse doesn't care.

True
But we had quite a few DPG and Afreeca Freecs Team kills this year as well

Also Time shows, that his strong showing at DH Winter was no fluke :D
E.: As I wrote that, TIME got destroyed 0-2 by DRG RIP

So with only Protoss qualifing in the EU qualifier and only Zergs in the Kr one, we will have Terrans only in the NA one tomorrow? I ll go with Byun, Cure and Heromarine then

IMO Zest has a pretty good shot at qualifying via NA. I would say Zest, Cure and ... how's TIME's connection to NA?

No no no, it hast be 3 Terrans

heh At least I was right about the Protoss part xD Not that I picked the right names
I imagine France should be able to take this unless Lilbow is busy practicing for Starcraft III. | KadaverBB is my fairy ban mother.
Edpayasugo
Profile Joined April 2013
United Kingdom2216 Posts
November 24 2020 11:46 GMT
#91
Starts soon, can't wait. Really missing GSL rn
FlaSh MMA INnoVation FanTaSy MKP TY Ryung | soO Dark Rogue | HuK PartinG Stork State
Azhrak
Profile Joined January 2011
Finland1196 Posts
November 24 2020 17:11 GMT
#92
Groups are out https://asusrogtournament.com/online-2020/groups !
starcraft2.fi
AzAlexZ
Profile Joined September 2016
Australia3303 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-11-24 17:35:19
November 24 2020 17:34 GMT
#93
Group B with Neeb, Stats, Reynor, and Byun lol
Would be a group of Death if Neeb and Byun are in top form
Faker is the GOAT!
dbRic1203
Profile Joined July 2019
Germany2655 Posts
November 24 2020 17:56 GMT
#94
Group A group of live. I realy like this for MaxPax, he had super tough groups in both his DH EU so far, lets hope he can do something with that
MaxPax
Philippe
Profile Joined October 2020
351 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-11-24 18:56:46
November 24 2020 18:52 GMT
#95
On November 25 2020 02:56 dbRic1203 wrote:
Group A group of live. I realy like this for MaxPax, he had super tough groups in both his DH EU so far, lets hope he can do something with that


Having to start against Rogue is rough but I agree it's doable for him. It could have been way worse.

Otherwise which group you would consider the group of death ? Given the rankings I would say either group B or C, but this doesn't mean everything
I'm just a cynical video game enjoyer who is probably unfazed by many business dealings many would find utterly distasteful, while not strictly illegal by the law as seen in a general sense in the world.
dbRic1203
Profile Joined July 2019
Germany2655 Posts
November 24 2020 21:33 GMT
#96
On November 25 2020 03:52 Philippe wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 25 2020 02:56 dbRic1203 wrote:
Group A group of live. I realy like this for MaxPax, he had super tough groups in both his DH EU so far, lets hope he can do something with that


Having to start against Rogue is rough but I agree it's doable for him. It could have been way worse.

Otherwise which group you would consider the group of death ? Given the rankings I would say either group B or C, but this doesn't mean everything

I d say Group D is group of death.

Well Max allways had to Play vs the no1 Seed of his group anyways. And if I had to choose between Reynor, Serral, Maru and Rogue for a online Bo3, I would take Rogue 10 out of 10 Times. Yes he can be realy. But he is the most volatile.
PartinG isn t in the best shape and MaxPax took Maps of him in the past allready. Special is by far the weakest invited player and MaxPax has even taken Bo3 of of him before. Don t get me wrong, the Protoss hope is still the underdog, but there is a chance.
MaxPax
deacon.frost
Profile Joined February 2013
Czech Republic12129 Posts
November 25 2020 12:31 GMT
#97
On November 25 2020 06:33 dbRic1203 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 25 2020 03:52 Philippe wrote:
On November 25 2020 02:56 dbRic1203 wrote:
Group A group of live. I realy like this for MaxPax, he had super tough groups in both his DH EU so far, lets hope he can do something with that


Having to start against Rogue is rough but I agree it's doable for him. It could have been way worse.

Otherwise which group you would consider the group of death ? Given the rankings I would say either group B or C, but this doesn't mean everything

I d say Group D is group of death.

Well Max allways had to Play vs the no1 Seed of his group anyways. And if I had to choose between Reynor, Serral, Maru and Rogue for a online Bo3, I would take Rogue 10 out of 10 Times. Yes he can be realy. But he is the most volatile.
PartinG isn t in the best shape and MaxPax took Maps of him in the past allready. Special is by far the weakest invited player and MaxPax has even taken Bo3 of of him before. Don t get me wrong, the Protoss hope is still the underdog, but there is a chance.

IMO Maru would be a better choice. It's an online BO3 and I believe in the Big Book of Protoss BS against Maru more. Meomaika style, baby.
I imagine France should be able to take this unless Lilbow is busy practicing for Starcraft III. | KadaverBB is my fairy ban mother.
dbRic1203
Profile Joined July 2019
Germany2655 Posts
November 25 2020 13:24 GMT
#98
On November 25 2020 21:31 deacon.frost wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 25 2020 06:33 dbRic1203 wrote:
On November 25 2020 03:52 Philippe wrote:
On November 25 2020 02:56 dbRic1203 wrote:
Group A group of live. I realy like this for MaxPax, he had super tough groups in both his DH EU so far, lets hope he can do something with that


Having to start against Rogue is rough but I agree it's doable for him. It could have been way worse.

Otherwise which group you would consider the group of death ? Given the rankings I would say either group B or C, but this doesn't mean everything

I d say Group D is group of death.

Well Max allways had to Play vs the no1 Seed of his group anyways. And if I had to choose between Reynor, Serral, Maru and Rogue for a online Bo3, I would take Rogue 10 out of 10 Times. Yes he can be realy. But he is the most volatile.
PartinG isn t in the best shape and MaxPax took Maps of him in the past allready. Special is by far the weakest invited player and MaxPax has even taken Bo3 of of him before. Don t get me wrong, the Protoss hope is still the underdog, but there is a chance.

IMO Maru would be a better choice. It's an online BO3 and I believe in the Big Book of Protoss BS against Maru more. Meomaika style, baby.

MaxPax has been better vs Zerg than vs Terran lately. Also he generally struggles more against Micro heavy players.
I don t see Rogue as one of those guys, who just has the best micro and wins with it, where MaxPax kind of struggles against. Rogue is more the player who figures out a completly brocken built and just stomps you with that. MaxPax is good when the game gets chaotic, so Rogue will fit him better than Maru I belive.
Still even if he just rolls over and dies vs Rogue, he still has a realistic shot vs Parting and Special

Also Max said it himselfe, that this is probably the best possible group for him
MaxPax
deacon.frost
Profile Joined February 2013
Czech Republic12129 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-11-26 09:37:36
November 26 2020 08:34 GMT
#99
On November 25 2020 22:24 dbRic1203 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 25 2020 21:31 deacon.frost wrote:
On November 25 2020 06:33 dbRic1203 wrote:
On November 25 2020 03:52 Philippe wrote:
On November 25 2020 02:56 dbRic1203 wrote:
Group A group of live. I realy like this for MaxPax, he had super tough groups in both his DH EU so far, lets hope he can do something with that


Having to start against Rogue is rough but I agree it's doable for him. It could have been way worse.

Otherwise which group you would consider the group of death ? Given the rankings I would say either group B or C, but this doesn't mean everything

I d say Group D is group of death.

Well Max allways had to Play vs the no1 Seed of his group anyways. And if I had to choose between Reynor, Serral, Maru and Rogue for a online Bo3, I would take Rogue 10 out of 10 Times. Yes he can be realy. But he is the most volatile.
PartinG isn t in the best shape and MaxPax took Maps of him in the past allready. Special is by far the weakest invited player and MaxPax has even taken Bo3 of of him before. Don t get me wrong, the Protoss hope is still the underdog, but there is a chance.

IMO Maru would be a better choice. It's an online BO3 and I believe in the Big Book of Protoss BS against Maru more. Meomaika style, baby.

MaxPax has been better vs Zerg than vs Terran lately. Also he generally struggles more against Micro heavy players.
I don t see Rogue as one of those guys, who just has the best micro and wins with it, where MaxPax kind of struggles against. Rogue is more the player who figures out a completly brocken built and just stomps you with that. MaxPax is good when the game gets chaotic, so Rogue will fit him better than Maru I belive.
Still even if he just rolls over and dies vs Rogue, he still has a realistic shot vs Parting and Special

Also Max said it himselfe, that this is probably the best possible group for him

Micro heavy, Korean vs European online. Are you sure about the micro heavy thing being a thing on this match?

Edit> since when do player know anything about their groups? There are some players who are picking their opponents in the GSL with them big words and then lose to them
I imagine France should be able to take this unless Lilbow is busy practicing for Starcraft III. | KadaverBB is my fairy ban mother.
Zidane
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
United States1688 Posts
November 26 2020 21:17 GMT
#100
Anyone else not see it showing on the calendar?
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 51 52 53 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 12h 35m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SteadfastSC 155
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 17236
Sea 2199
Artosis 360
Larva 294
ZZZero.O 18
ajuk12(nOOB) 17
yabsab 10
Dota 2
PGG 176
League of Legends
JimRising 879
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K366
flusha153
Super Smash Bros
Liquid`Ken109
PPMD32
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu386
Other Games
Grubby2720
FrodaN1879
UpATreeSC1515
ViBE160
C9.Mang0140
rGuardiaN34
feardragon14
fpsfer 2
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV128
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 51
• RyuSc2 42
• musti20045 32
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV457
League of Legends
• Doublelift3421
Other Games
• imaqtpie1610
Upcoming Events
Map Test Tournament
12h 35m
OSC
14h 35m
Korean StarCraft League
1d 4h
CranKy Ducklings
1d 11h
Map Test Tournament
1d 12h
OSC
1d 16h
[BSL 2025] Weekly
1d 19h
Safe House 2
1d 19h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
Map Test Tournament
2 days
[ Show More ]
OSC
2 days
IPSL
2 days
Bonyth vs Art_Of_Turtle
Razz vs rasowy
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS2
Maestros of the Game
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
WardiTV TLMC #15
EC S1
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025

Upcoming

SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
RSL Offline Finals
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.