• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 15:24
CEST 21:24
KST 04:24
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!6[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
Weekly Cups (October 5-11): Farewell to 5.0.162Rollback Netcode in Brood War1165.0.17 Patch Notes - October 7, 202624Weekly Cups Results (Sep 28-Oct 4)0SC4ALL: II SC2 Complete Invited Player Lineup10
StarCraft 2
General
How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR? Server Blocker Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners SCII needs to put more weight on strategy and tact Stellar Fest 2 Replay Pack
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) $3,500 WardiTV Not-Summer Championship Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[G] How to playtest arcade maps [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Sweltering Sands [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 547 Temple Of Terror Mutation # 546 Catch the Train Mutation # 545 And Drops and Rifts
Brood War
General
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory! Rollback Netcode in Brood War [Megathread] Daily Funny Videos Bot on ladder BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[$1250] International ShieldBattery League ASL 22 Finals 2v2v2v2 Tournament Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Simple Questions, Simple Answers Replay Review Process - What do you do?
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Dawn of War IV General RTS Discussion Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Chess Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
MLB/Baseball 2023 Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
The Link Between Gaming and …
TrAiDoS
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 6882 users

ASUS ROG 2020 Announced, Nov 27-29 - Page 5

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments
1049 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 51 52 53 Next
dbRic1203
Profile Joined July 2019
Germany2655 Posts
November 23 2020 17:48 GMT
#81
On November 24 2020 02:11 Elche wrote:
Thank god Elazer didn't qualify, not that dislike Elazer but it would have been so unfair to the guys eliminated in the EU quali LB.

Why?
They all could have tried in the NA one as well. Actually many of them did. If they didn t it was their choice.
MaxPax
Elche
Profile Joined June 2011
Finland170 Posts
November 23 2020 20:56 GMT
#82
On November 24 2020 02:48 dbRic1203 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 24 2020 02:11 Elche wrote:
Thank god Elazer didn't qualify, not that dislike Elazer but it would have been so unfair to the guys eliminated in the EU quali LB.

Why?
They all could have tried in the NA one as well. Actually many of them did. If they didn t it was their choice.


Apparently they ran the LB from a round too early and three of the contenders for the last qualifying spots were knocked out by players that should have been out already.

AzAlexZ
Profile Joined September 2016
Australia3303 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-11-23 21:16:32
November 23 2020 21:15 GMT
#83
On November 24 2020 05:56 Elche wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 24 2020 02:48 dbRic1203 wrote:
On November 24 2020 02:11 Elche wrote:
Thank god Elazer didn't qualify, not that dislike Elazer but it would have been so unfair to the guys eliminated in the EU quali LB.

Why?
They all could have tried in the NA one as well. Actually many of them did. If they didn t it was their choice.


Apparently they ran the LB from a round too early and three of the contenders for the last qualifying spots were knocked out by players that should have been out already.


what do you mean 'should have been out'?
Your logic is confusing
Faker is the GOAT!
Elentos
Profile Blog Joined February 2015
55594 Posts
November 23 2020 21:51 GMT
#84
On November 24 2020 06:15 AzAlexZ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 24 2020 05:56 Elche wrote:
On November 24 2020 02:48 dbRic1203 wrote:
On November 24 2020 02:11 Elche wrote:
Thank god Elazer didn't qualify, not that dislike Elazer but it would have been so unfair to the guys eliminated in the EU quali LB.

Why?
They all could have tried in the NA one as well. Actually many of them did. If they didn t it was their choice.


Apparently they ran the LB from a round too early and three of the contenders for the last qualifying spots were knocked out by players that should have been out already.


what do you mean 'should have been out'?
Your logic is confusing

The format for the EU qualifier was supposed to be double elimination starting from the Ro16. This was for some reason changed while the qualifier was already going on (which is the hallmark of all great tournaments really). Elazer lost in the Ro32 so he would not originally have had a chance to play in the loser bracket.
Every 60 seconds in Africa, a minute passes.
mikedupp
Profile Joined May 2020
233 Posts
November 23 2020 22:12 GMT
#85
On November 24 2020 06:51 Elentos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 24 2020 06:15 AzAlexZ wrote:
On November 24 2020 05:56 Elche wrote:
On November 24 2020 02:48 dbRic1203 wrote:
On November 24 2020 02:11 Elche wrote:
Thank god Elazer didn't qualify, not that dislike Elazer but it would have been so unfair to the guys eliminated in the EU quali LB.

Why?
They all could have tried in the NA one as well. Actually many of them did. If they didn t it was their choice.


Apparently they ran the LB from a round too early and three of the contenders for the last qualifying spots were knocked out by players that should have been out already.


what do you mean 'should have been out'?
Your logic is confusing

The format for the EU qualifier was supposed to be double elimination starting from the Ro16. This was for some reason changed while the qualifier was already going on (which is the hallmark of all great tournaments really). Elazer lost in the Ro32 so he would not originally have had a chance to play in the loser bracket.



Still not understanding the "knocked out by players that should have been out already"
Back2Back
Profile Joined August 2020
24 Posts
November 23 2020 22:55 GMT
#86
On November 24 2020 07:12 mikedupp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 24 2020 06:51 Elentos wrote:
On November 24 2020 06:15 AzAlexZ wrote:
On November 24 2020 05:56 Elche wrote:
On November 24 2020 02:48 dbRic1203 wrote:
On November 24 2020 02:11 Elche wrote:
Thank god Elazer didn't qualify, not that dislike Elazer but it would have been so unfair to the guys eliminated in the EU quali LB.

Why?
They all could have tried in the NA one as well. Actually many of them did. If they didn t it was their choice.


Apparently they ran the LB from a round too early and three of the contenders for the last qualifying spots were knocked out by players that should have been out already.


what do you mean 'should have been out'?
Your logic is confusing

The format for the EU qualifier was supposed to be double elimination starting from the Ro16. This was for some reason changed while the qualifier was already going on (which is the hallmark of all great tournaments really). Elazer lost in the Ro32 so he would not originally have had a chance to play in the loser bracket.



Still not understanding the "knocked out by players that should have been out already"


I believe it goes like this:

In Korea and America the lower bracket started from Ro16. Meaning you get a second 'life' starting from Ro16 and onward. But for some reason they changed the European one to start from Ro32.

So if you had been defeated in Ro32 in America you would have been eliminated from the tournament. While for some reason in Europe people who got beat in the round of 32 went to the lower bracket instead and got another chance.

That gave people who made it too Ro16 and then got eliminated by someone from the Ro32 a bit salty because according to the tournament rules those people should not have had been in a lower bracket.
dbRic1203
Profile Joined July 2019
Germany2655 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-11-24 08:45:30
November 24 2020 07:37 GMT
#87
On November 24 2020 07:55 Back2Back wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 24 2020 07:12 mikedupp wrote:
On November 24 2020 06:51 Elentos wrote:
On November 24 2020 06:15 AzAlexZ wrote:
On November 24 2020 05:56 Elche wrote:
On November 24 2020 02:48 dbRic1203 wrote:
On November 24 2020 02:11 Elche wrote:
Thank god Elazer didn't qualify, not that dislike Elazer but it would have been so unfair to the guys eliminated in the EU quali LB.

Why?
They all could have tried in the NA one as well. Actually many of them did. If they didn t it was their choice.


Apparently they ran the LB from a round too early and three of the contenders for the last qualifying spots were knocked out by players that should have been out already.


what do you mean 'should have been out'?
Your logic is confusing

The format for the EU qualifier was supposed to be double elimination starting from the Ro16. This was for some reason changed while the qualifier was already going on (which is the hallmark of all great tournaments really). Elazer lost in the Ro32 so he would not originally have had a chance to play in the loser bracket.



Still not understanding the "knocked out by players that should have been out already"


I believe it goes like this:

In Korea and America the lower bracket started from Ro16. Meaning you get a second 'life' starting from Ro16 and onward. But for some reason they changed the European one to start from Ro32.

So if you had been defeated in Ro32 in America you would have been eliminated from the tournament. While for some reason in Europe people who got beat in the round of 32 went to the lower bracket instead and got another chance.

That gave people who made it too Ro16 and then got eliminated by someone from the Ro32 a bit salty because according to the tournament rules those people should not have had been in a lower bracket.

But that didn t even affect the endresult. Harstem qualified in the end from the lower breaket in EU. Elazer qualified in NA

Still changing Rules mid tournament is dumb and shouldn t happen
MaxPax
Elche
Profile Joined June 2011
Finland170 Posts
November 24 2020 08:04 GMT
#88
On November 24 2020 16:37 dbRic1203 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 24 2020 07:55 Back2Back wrote:
On November 24 2020 07:12 mikedupp wrote:
On November 24 2020 06:51 Elentos wrote:
On November 24 2020 06:15 AzAlexZ wrote:
On November 24 2020 05:56 Elche wrote:
On November 24 2020 02:48 dbRic1203 wrote:
On November 24 2020 02:11 Elche wrote:
Thank god Elazer didn't qualify, not that dislike Elazer but it would have been so unfair to the guys eliminated in the EU quali LB.

Why?
They all could have tried in the NA one as well. Actually many of them did. If they didn t it was their choice.


Apparently they ran the LB from a round too early and three of the contenders for the last qualifying spots were knocked out by players that should have been out already.


what do you mean 'should have been out'?
Your logic is confusing

The format for the EU qualifier was supposed to be double elimination starting from the Ro16. This was for some reason changed while the qualifier was already going on (which is the hallmark of all great tournaments really). Elazer lost in the Ro32 so he would not originally have had a chance to play in the loser bracket.



Still not understanding the "knocked out by players that should have been out already"


I believe it goes like this:

In Korea and America the lower bracket started from Ro16. Meaning you get a second 'life' starting from Ro16 and onward. But for some reason they changed the European one to start from Ro32.

So if you had been defeated in Ro32 in America you would have been eliminated from the tournament. While for some reason in Europe people who got beat in the round of 32 went to the lower bracket instead and got another chance.

That gave people who made it too Ro16 and then got eliminated by someone from the Ro32 a bit salty because according to the tournament rules those people should not have had been in a lower bracket.

But that didn t even affect the endresult. Harstem qualified in the end from the lower breaket in EU. Elazer qualified in NA

Still changing Rules mid tournament is dumb and shouldn t happen


Elazer didn't qualify.
No veritable damage was done but had Elazer qualified it would have essentially locked in the Top7 from EU.
Kafka777
Profile Joined December 2015
361 Posts
November 24 2020 08:29 GMT
#89
On November 24 2020 17:04 Elche wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 24 2020 16:37 dbRic1203 wrote:
On November 24 2020 07:55 Back2Back wrote:
On November 24 2020 07:12 mikedupp wrote:
On November 24 2020 06:51 Elentos wrote:
On November 24 2020 06:15 AzAlexZ wrote:
On November 24 2020 05:56 Elche wrote:
On November 24 2020 02:48 dbRic1203 wrote:
On November 24 2020 02:11 Elche wrote:
Thank god Elazer didn't qualify, not that dislike Elazer but it would have been so unfair to the guys eliminated in the EU quali LB.

Why?
They all could have tried in the NA one as well. Actually many of them did. If they didn t it was their choice.


Apparently they ran the LB from a round too early and three of the contenders for the last qualifying spots were knocked out by players that should have been out already.


what do you mean 'should have been out'?
Your logic is confusing

The format for the EU qualifier was supposed to be double elimination starting from the Ro16. This was for some reason changed while the qualifier was already going on (which is the hallmark of all great tournaments really). Elazer lost in the Ro32 so he would not originally have had a chance to play in the loser bracket.



Still not understanding the "knocked out by players that should have been out already"


I believe it goes like this:

In Korea and America the lower bracket started from Ro16. Meaning you get a second 'life' starting from Ro16 and onward. But for some reason they changed the European one to start from Ro32.

So if you had been defeated in Ro32 in America you would have been eliminated from the tournament. While for some reason in Europe people who got beat in the round of 32 went to the lower bracket instead and got another chance.

That gave people who made it too Ro16 and then got eliminated by someone from the Ro32 a bit salty because according to the tournament rules those people should not have had been in a lower bracket.

But that didn t even affect the endresult. Harstem qualified in the end from the lower breaket in EU. Elazer qualified in NA

Still changing Rules mid tournament is dumb and shouldn t happen


Elazer didn't qualify.
No veritable damage was done but had Elazer qualified it would have essentially locked in the Top7 from EU.


Had he qualified it would still be fair and square for everyone and no damage could have been done.

deacon.frost
Profile Joined February 2013
Czech Republic12134 Posts
November 24 2020 11:13 GMT
#90
On November 22 2020 00:26 dbRic1203 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 21 2020 23:38 deacon.frost wrote:
On November 21 2020 21:04 dbRic1203 wrote:
On November 21 2020 20:27 deacon.frost wrote:
On November 21 2020 19:23 dbRic1203 wrote:
Korean online qualifiers and walkovers in the lower breaket.
Name a more iconic duo
Even now, where the Koreans stream into the EPT Open Cups, we see multiple Walkovers there
At least it seems to be less Bad as in previous events..

JAGW teamkill. While Cure & Trap aren't on the same team anymore, the curse doesn't care.

True
But we had quite a few DPG and Afreeca Freecs Team kills this year as well

Also Time shows, that his strong showing at DH Winter was no fluke :D
E.: As I wrote that, TIME got destroyed 0-2 by DRG RIP

So with only Protoss qualifing in the EU qualifier and only Zergs in the Kr one, we will have Terrans only in the NA one tomorrow? I ll go with Byun, Cure and Heromarine then

IMO Zest has a pretty good shot at qualifying via NA. I would say Zest, Cure and ... how's TIME's connection to NA?

No no no, it hast be 3 Terrans

heh At least I was right about the Protoss part xD Not that I picked the right names
I imagine France should be able to take this unless Lilbow is busy practicing for Starcraft III. | KadaverBB is my fairy ban mother.
Edpayasugo
Profile Joined April 2013
United Kingdom2223 Posts
November 24 2020 11:46 GMT
#91
Starts soon, can't wait. Really missing GSL rn
FlaSh MMA INnoVation FanTaSy MKP TY Ryung | soO Dark Rogue | HuK PartinG Stork State
Azhrak
Profile Joined January 2011
Finland1198 Posts
November 24 2020 17:11 GMT
#92
Groups are out https://asusrogtournament.com/online-2020/groups !
starcraft2.fi
AzAlexZ
Profile Joined September 2016
Australia3303 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-11-24 17:35:19
November 24 2020 17:34 GMT
#93
Group B with Neeb, Stats, Reynor, and Byun lol
Would be a group of Death if Neeb and Byun are in top form
Faker is the GOAT!
dbRic1203
Profile Joined July 2019
Germany2655 Posts
November 24 2020 17:56 GMT
#94
Group A group of live. I realy like this for MaxPax, he had super tough groups in both his DH EU so far, lets hope he can do something with that
MaxPax
Philippe
Profile Joined October 2020
354 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-11-24 18:56:46
November 24 2020 18:52 GMT
#95
On November 25 2020 02:56 dbRic1203 wrote:
Group A group of live. I realy like this for MaxPax, he had super tough groups in both his DH EU so far, lets hope he can do something with that


Having to start against Rogue is rough but I agree it's doable for him. It could have been way worse.

Otherwise which group you would consider the group of death ? Given the rankings I would say either group B or C, but this doesn't mean everything
I'm just a cynical video game enjoyer who is probably unfazed by many business dealings many would find utterly distasteful, while not strictly illegal by the law as seen in a general sense in the world.
dbRic1203
Profile Joined July 2019
Germany2655 Posts
November 24 2020 21:33 GMT
#96
On November 25 2020 03:52 Philippe wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 25 2020 02:56 dbRic1203 wrote:
Group A group of live. I realy like this for MaxPax, he had super tough groups in both his DH EU so far, lets hope he can do something with that


Having to start against Rogue is rough but I agree it's doable for him. It could have been way worse.

Otherwise which group you would consider the group of death ? Given the rankings I would say either group B or C, but this doesn't mean everything

I d say Group D is group of death.

Well Max allways had to Play vs the no1 Seed of his group anyways. And if I had to choose between Reynor, Serral, Maru and Rogue for a online Bo3, I would take Rogue 10 out of 10 Times. Yes he can be realy. But he is the most volatile.
PartinG isn t in the best shape and MaxPax took Maps of him in the past allready. Special is by far the weakest invited player and MaxPax has even taken Bo3 of of him before. Don t get me wrong, the Protoss hope is still the underdog, but there is a chance.
MaxPax
deacon.frost
Profile Joined February 2013
Czech Republic12134 Posts
November 25 2020 12:31 GMT
#97
On November 25 2020 06:33 dbRic1203 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 25 2020 03:52 Philippe wrote:
On November 25 2020 02:56 dbRic1203 wrote:
Group A group of live. I realy like this for MaxPax, he had super tough groups in both his DH EU so far, lets hope he can do something with that


Having to start against Rogue is rough but I agree it's doable for him. It could have been way worse.

Otherwise which group you would consider the group of death ? Given the rankings I would say either group B or C, but this doesn't mean everything

I d say Group D is group of death.

Well Max allways had to Play vs the no1 Seed of his group anyways. And if I had to choose between Reynor, Serral, Maru and Rogue for a online Bo3, I would take Rogue 10 out of 10 Times. Yes he can be realy. But he is the most volatile.
PartinG isn t in the best shape and MaxPax took Maps of him in the past allready. Special is by far the weakest invited player and MaxPax has even taken Bo3 of of him before. Don t get me wrong, the Protoss hope is still the underdog, but there is a chance.

IMO Maru would be a better choice. It's an online BO3 and I believe in the Big Book of Protoss BS against Maru more. Meomaika style, baby.
I imagine France should be able to take this unless Lilbow is busy practicing for Starcraft III. | KadaverBB is my fairy ban mother.
dbRic1203
Profile Joined July 2019
Germany2655 Posts
November 25 2020 13:24 GMT
#98
On November 25 2020 21:31 deacon.frost wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 25 2020 06:33 dbRic1203 wrote:
On November 25 2020 03:52 Philippe wrote:
On November 25 2020 02:56 dbRic1203 wrote:
Group A group of live. I realy like this for MaxPax, he had super tough groups in both his DH EU so far, lets hope he can do something with that


Having to start against Rogue is rough but I agree it's doable for him. It could have been way worse.

Otherwise which group you would consider the group of death ? Given the rankings I would say either group B or C, but this doesn't mean everything

I d say Group D is group of death.

Well Max allways had to Play vs the no1 Seed of his group anyways. And if I had to choose between Reynor, Serral, Maru and Rogue for a online Bo3, I would take Rogue 10 out of 10 Times. Yes he can be realy. But he is the most volatile.
PartinG isn t in the best shape and MaxPax took Maps of him in the past allready. Special is by far the weakest invited player and MaxPax has even taken Bo3 of of him before. Don t get me wrong, the Protoss hope is still the underdog, but there is a chance.

IMO Maru would be a better choice. It's an online BO3 and I believe in the Big Book of Protoss BS against Maru more. Meomaika style, baby.

MaxPax has been better vs Zerg than vs Terran lately. Also he generally struggles more against Micro heavy players.
I don t see Rogue as one of those guys, who just has the best micro and wins with it, where MaxPax kind of struggles against. Rogue is more the player who figures out a completly brocken built and just stomps you with that. MaxPax is good when the game gets chaotic, so Rogue will fit him better than Maru I belive.
Still even if he just rolls over and dies vs Rogue, he still has a realistic shot vs Parting and Special

Also Max said it himselfe, that this is probably the best possible group for him
MaxPax
deacon.frost
Profile Joined February 2013
Czech Republic12134 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-11-26 09:37:36
November 26 2020 08:34 GMT
#99
On November 25 2020 22:24 dbRic1203 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 25 2020 21:31 deacon.frost wrote:
On November 25 2020 06:33 dbRic1203 wrote:
On November 25 2020 03:52 Philippe wrote:
On November 25 2020 02:56 dbRic1203 wrote:
Group A group of live. I realy like this for MaxPax, he had super tough groups in both his DH EU so far, lets hope he can do something with that


Having to start against Rogue is rough but I agree it's doable for him. It could have been way worse.

Otherwise which group you would consider the group of death ? Given the rankings I would say either group B or C, but this doesn't mean everything

I d say Group D is group of death.

Well Max allways had to Play vs the no1 Seed of his group anyways. And if I had to choose between Reynor, Serral, Maru and Rogue for a online Bo3, I would take Rogue 10 out of 10 Times. Yes he can be realy. But he is the most volatile.
PartinG isn t in the best shape and MaxPax took Maps of him in the past allready. Special is by far the weakest invited player and MaxPax has even taken Bo3 of of him before. Don t get me wrong, the Protoss hope is still the underdog, but there is a chance.

IMO Maru would be a better choice. It's an online BO3 and I believe in the Big Book of Protoss BS against Maru more. Meomaika style, baby.

MaxPax has been better vs Zerg than vs Terran lately. Also he generally struggles more against Micro heavy players.
I don t see Rogue as one of those guys, who just has the best micro and wins with it, where MaxPax kind of struggles against. Rogue is more the player who figures out a completly brocken built and just stomps you with that. MaxPax is good when the game gets chaotic, so Rogue will fit him better than Maru I belive.
Still even if he just rolls over and dies vs Rogue, he still has a realistic shot vs Parting and Special

Also Max said it himselfe, that this is probably the best possible group for him

Micro heavy, Korean vs European online. Are you sure about the micro heavy thing being a thing on this match?

Edit> since when do player know anything about their groups? There are some players who are picking their opponents in the GSL with them big words and then lose to them
I imagine France should be able to take this unless Lilbow is busy practicing for Starcraft III. | KadaverBB is my fairy ban mother.
Zidane
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
United States1692 Posts
November 26 2020 21:17 GMT
#100
Anyone else not see it showing on the calendar?
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 51 52 53 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 7h 36m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech115
JuggernautJason81
BRAT_OK 75
MindelVK 16
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 642
Dewaltoss 140
firebathero 91
White-Ra 91
ToSsGirL 25
ajuk12(nOOB) 9
Dota 2
Gorgc1803
canceldota105
Counter-Strike
fl0m3954
PGG 50
Heroes of the Storm
Grubby3702
Other Games
RotterdaM860
Beastyqt639
WinterStarcraft460
shahzam410
Khaldor312
IndyStarCraft 123
C9.Mang0120
QueenE72
UpATreeSC70
FrodaN0
Organizations
StarCraft 2
TaKeTV 369
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 36
• FirePhoenix13
• 80smullet 11
• Michael_bg 4
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 4134
• masondota21120
League of Legends
• Nemesis3181
• Jankos2734
Other Games
• imaqtpie779
• Shiphtur584
Upcoming Events
Korean StarCraft League
7h 36m
Afreeca Starleague
10h 36m
Rush vs Soulkey
CranKy Ducklings
14h 36m
WardiTV Invitational
15h 36m
AI Arena Tournament
20h 36m
BSL Open Qualifier
23h 36m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 14h
OSC
1d 17h
IPSL
1d 20h
BSL Open Qualifier
1d 23h
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Weekly
2 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
3 days
PiGosaur Cup
4 days
The PondCast
4 days
Kung Fu Cup
4 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Super Anchor Qualifying S3
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Copium Cup

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
HCC Season 3
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSC
BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
eXTREMESLAND '26: SEA 4th Place
1win Private Club #2
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.