It's always good to push out with pure marines without combat shields when you don't know if the Protoss has colossi. As Starcraft 2 players we should always tell ourselves "Oh what could possibly go wrong? YOLO"
On January 08 2017 02:08 Alchemik wrote: I really wonder why carriers actually need to be viable, with how absolutely devoid of micro or any thought they are
every unit must be viable. And have some cool activate ability! It's good for viewer experience! - Blizz
On January 08 2017 02:08 Alchemik wrote: I really wonder why carriers actually need to be viable, with how absolutely devoid of micro or any thought they are
Because it's an iconic unit. The problem is that it doesn't work nearly as well as in bw
On January 08 2017 02:09 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote: It's funny how Carriers went from a hype unit when they were rare too a super anti hype unit when they are legit
Thats about the only funny thing about them. Terrible unit that allows P to win with absolute no micro with ease.
On January 08 2017 02:08 Alchemik wrote: I really wonder why carriers actually need to be viable, with how absolutely devoid of micro or any thought they are
Because it's an iconic unit. The problem is that it doesn't work nearly as well as in bw
and what kind of reason is that? "oh, we need it, it was cool 10 years ago", like what?
On January 08 2017 02:08 Alchemik wrote: I really wonder why carriers actually need to be viable, with how absolutely devoid of micro or any thought they are
Because it's an iconic unit. The problem is that it doesn't work nearly as well as in bw
and what kind of reason is that? "oh, we need it, it was cool 10 years ago", like what?
Why not try to make it work? Don't see the issue tbh, units which are iconic for starcraft should be playable in starcraft
On January 08 2017 02:08 Alchemik wrote: I really wonder why carriers actually need to be viable, with how absolutely devoid of micro or any thought they are
Because it's an iconic unit. The problem is that it doesn't work nearly as well as in bw
and what kind of reason is that? "oh, we need it, it was cool 10 years ago", like what?
Why not try to make it work? Don't see the issue tbh, units which are iconic for starcraft should be playable in starcraft
how can you make such a unit work without making it completly amove though, it'd need a major redesign
On January 08 2017 02:09 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote: It's funny how Carriers went from a hype unit when they were rare too a super anti hype unit when they are legit
Thats about the only funny thing about them. Terrible unit that allows P to win with absolute no micro with ease.
I have no problem with them being played from time to time. but when carrier turtle becomes one of the best ways to play the game there's a problem.
On January 08 2017 02:08 Alchemik wrote: I really wonder why carriers actually need to be viable, with how absolutely devoid of micro or any thought they are
Because it's an iconic unit. The problem is that it doesn't work nearly as well as in bw
and what kind of reason is that? "oh, we need it, it was cool 10 years ago", like what?
Why not try to make it work? Don't see the issue tbh, units which are iconic for starcraft should be playable in starcraft
no, every unit should be playable in some situations, and that's always been the case with carriers. I don't see a way to make them actually a good unit for the game, they're possibly the most a-move and mindless unit in Starcraft
On January 08 2017 02:08 Alchemik wrote: I really wonder why carriers actually need to be viable, with how absolutely devoid of micro or any thought they are
Because it's an iconic unit. The problem is that it doesn't work nearly as well as in bw
and what kind of reason is that? "oh, we need it, it was cool 10 years ago", like what?
Why not try to make it work? Don't see the issue tbh, units which are iconic for starcraft should be playable in starcraft
how can you make such a unit work without making it completly amove though, it'd need a major redesign
On January 08 2017 02:08 Alchemik wrote: I really wonder why carriers actually need to be viable, with how absolutely devoid of micro or any thought they are
Because it's an iconic unit. The problem is that it doesn't work nearly as well as in bw
and what kind of reason is that? "oh, we need it, it was cool 10 years ago", like what?
Why not try to make it work? Don't see the issue tbh, units which are iconic for starcraft should be playable in starcraft
how can you make such a unit work without making it completly amove though, it'd need a major redesign
carriers aren't complete amove though, you can micro them back after interceptors are out to avoid taking damage.
On January 08 2017 02:08 Alchemik wrote: I really wonder why carriers actually need to be viable, with how absolutely devoid of micro or any thought they are
Because it's an iconic unit. The problem is that it doesn't work nearly as well as in bw
and what kind of reason is that? "oh, we need it, it was cool 10 years ago", like what?
On January 08 2017 02:08 Alchemik wrote: I really wonder why carriers actually need to be viable, with how absolutely devoid of micro or any thought they are
Because it's an iconic unit. The problem is that it doesn't work nearly as well as in bw
and what kind of reason is that? "oh, we need it, it was cool 10 years ago", like what?
Why not try to make it work? Don't see the issue tbh, units which are iconic for starcraft should be playable in starcraft
no, every unit should be playable in some situations, and that's always been the case with carriers. I don't see a way to make them actually a good unit for the game, they're possibly the most a-move and mindless unit in Starcraft
its gonna take more than that to beat wol colossi or hots SHs as most amove
On January 08 2017 02:08 Alchemik wrote: I really wonder why carriers actually need to be viable, with how absolutely devoid of micro or any thought they are
Because it's an iconic unit. The problem is that it doesn't work nearly as well as in bw
and what kind of reason is that? "oh, we need it, it was cool 10 years ago", like what?
Why not try to make it work? Don't see the issue tbh, units which are iconic for starcraft should be playable in starcraft
no, every unit should be playable in some situations, and that's always been the case with carriers. I don't see a way to make them actually a good unit for the game, they're possibly the most a-move and mindless unit in Starcraft
well yeah the current version of the carrier and how it works in the game is bad, but that could change if blizzard actually tried to solve it
On January 08 2017 02:08 Alchemik wrote: I really wonder why carriers actually need to be viable, with how absolutely devoid of micro or any thought they are
Because it's an iconic unit. The problem is that it doesn't work nearly as well as in bw
and what kind of reason is that? "oh, we need it, it was cool 10 years ago", like what?
Why not try to make it work? Don't see the issue tbh, units which are iconic for starcraft should be playable in starcraft
no, every unit should be playable in some situations, and that's always been the case with carriers. I don't see a way to make them actually a good unit for the game, they're possibly the most a-move and mindless unit in Starcraft
its gonna take more than that to beat wol colossi or hots SHs as most amove
On January 08 2017 02:08 Alchemik wrote: I really wonder why carriers actually need to be viable, with how absolutely devoid of micro or any thought they are
Because it's an iconic unit. The problem is that it doesn't work nearly as well as in bw
and what kind of reason is that? "oh, we need it, it was cool 10 years ago", like what?
Why not try to make it work? Don't see the issue tbh, units which are iconic for starcraft should be playable in starcraft
no, every unit should be playable in some situations, and that's always been the case with carriers. I don't see a way to make them actually a good unit for the game, they're possibly the most a-move and mindless unit in Starcraft
its gonna take more than that to beat wol colossi or hots SHs as most amove
On January 08 2017 02:08 Alchemik wrote: I really wonder why carriers actually need to be viable, with how absolutely devoid of micro or any thought they are
Because it's an iconic unit. The problem is that it doesn't work nearly as well as in bw
and what kind of reason is that? "oh, we need it, it was cool 10 years ago", like what?
Why not try to make it work? Don't see the issue tbh, units which are iconic for starcraft should be playable in starcraft
no, every unit should be playable in some situations, and that's always been the case with carriers. I don't see a way to make them actually a good unit for the game, they're possibly the most a-move and mindless unit in Starcraft
its gonna take more than that to beat wol colossi or hots SHs as most amove
SH's actually took skill, aside from games on Overgrowth, it was always the better playing winning. SH turtle was the hardest ZvP style to play, while mass carrier is the easiest PvZ. pretty big difference if you ask me
On January 08 2017 02:08 Alchemik wrote: I really wonder why carriers actually need to be viable, with how absolutely devoid of micro or any thought they are
Because it's an iconic unit. The problem is that it doesn't work nearly as well as in bw
and what kind of reason is that? "oh, we need it, it was cool 10 years ago", like what?
Why not try to make it work? Don't see the issue tbh, units which are iconic for starcraft should be playable in starcraft
no, every unit should be playable in some situations, and that's always been the case with carriers. I don't see a way to make them actually a good unit for the game, they're possibly the most a-move and mindless unit in Starcraft
its gonna take more than that to beat wol colossi or hots SHs as most amove
I never saw SHs amoved :O
you're right you dont even need amove
meanwhile snute sees an open wall an no sentries, but keeps all 50 lings outside and run in with 6 roaches
On January 08 2017 02:08 Alchemik wrote: I really wonder why carriers actually need to be viable, with how absolutely devoid of micro or any thought they are
Because it's an iconic unit. The problem is that it doesn't work nearly as well as in bw
and what kind of reason is that? "oh, we need it, it was cool 10 years ago", like what?
Why not try to make it work? Don't see the issue tbh, units which are iconic for starcraft should be playable in starcraft
no, every unit should be playable in some situations, and that's always been the case with carriers. I don't see a way to make them actually a good unit for the game, they're possibly the most a-move and mindless unit in Starcraft
its gonna take more than that to beat wol colossi or hots SHs as most amove
SH's actually took skill, aside from games on Overgrowth, it was always the better playing winning. SH turtle was the hardest ZvP style to play, while mass carrier is the easiest PvZ. pretty big difference if you ask me
I thought carriers actually have decent micro potential with the interceptor AI changes But it is probably just because that when you actually have the critical number of carriers micro them is not really important
On January 08 2017 02:08 Alchemik wrote: I really wonder why carriers actually need to be viable, with how absolutely devoid of micro or any thought they are
Because it's an iconic unit. The problem is that it doesn't work nearly as well as in bw
and what kind of reason is that? "oh, we need it, it was cool 10 years ago", like what?
Why not try to make it work? Don't see the issue tbh, units which are iconic for starcraft should be playable in starcraft
no, every unit should be playable in some situations, and that's always been the case with carriers. I don't see a way to make them actually a good unit for the game, they're possibly the most a-move and mindless unit in Starcraft
its gonna take more than that to beat wol colossi or hots SHs as most amove
SH's actually took skill, aside from games on Overgrowth, it was always the better playing winning. SH turtle was the hardest ZvP style to play, while mass carrier is the easiest PvZ. pretty big difference if you ask me
i thought we were talking micro wise
when you went SH's, you had to also make queen/viper/corruptor/infestor
and also, there's much more to the game than micro, carriers are just very basic in every fundamental part of Starcraft - basic macro, basic micro, basic positioning, basic composition
On January 08 2017 02:08 Alchemik wrote: I really wonder why carriers actually need to be viable, with how absolutely devoid of micro or any thought they are
Because it's an iconic unit. The problem is that it doesn't work nearly as well as in bw
and what kind of reason is that? "oh, we need it, it was cool 10 years ago", like what?
Why not try to make it work? Don't see the issue tbh, units which are iconic for starcraft should be playable in starcraft
no, every unit should be playable in some situations, and that's always been the case with carriers. I don't see a way to make them actually a good unit for the game, they're possibly the most a-move and mindless unit in Starcraft
its gonna take more than that to beat wol colossi or hots SHs as most amove
SH's actually took skill, aside from games on Overgrowth, it was always the better playing winning. SH turtle was the hardest ZvP style to play, while mass carrier is the easiest PvZ. pretty big difference if you ask me
i thought we were talking micro wise
when you went SH's, you had to also make queen/viper/corruptor/infestor
and also, there's much more to the game than micro, carriers are just very basic in every fundamental part of Starcraft - basic macro, basic micro, basic positioning, basic composition
Yeah i was simply talking about per unit micro management
Snute's mistake was therefore that he didn't neural a probe to tech to his own carriers.
Probably the only way you can win as zerg
back in the SH era I played a game against a zerg who neuraled my scv and teched up to mass raven himself -then he lost horribly because he had no experience how to play with mass raven.
Snute's mistake was therefore that he didn't neural a probe to tech to his own carriers.
Probably the only way you can win as zerg
back in the SH era I played a game against a zerg who neuraled my scv and teched up to mass raven himself -then he lost horribly because he had no experience how to play with mass raven.
You didn't care about the neural? :D Neural on scvs is pretty hard tbh^^
Snute's mistake was therefore that he didn't neural a probe to tech to his own carriers.
Probably the only way you can win as zerg
back in the SH era I played a game against a zerg who neuraled my scv and teched up to mass raven himself -then he lost horribly because he had no experience how to play with mass raven.
You didn't care about the neural? :D Neural on scvs is pretty hard tbh^^
I amoved most of my scvs across the map because I wanted to free up supply
On January 08 2017 02:37 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote: Do the teams have to give up their starting players beforehand? or do they decide on the spot during this interview?
Before I assume, otherwise the second captain would have an advantage.
On January 08 2017 02:37 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote: Do the teams have to give up their starting players beforehand? or do they decide on the spot during this interview?
i do wonder, because the second person picking have an advantage
On January 08 2017 02:37 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote: Do the teams have to give up their starting players beforehand? or do they decide on the spot during this interview?
has to be beforehand otherwise you could just wait for the opponent to announce his player and choose yours
On January 08 2017 02:37 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote: Do the teams have to give up their starting players beforehand? or do they decide on the spot during this interview?
has to be beforehand otherwise you could just wait for the opponent to announce his player and choose yours
I am sure ogaming thought of that, aeromi is on top of that!
On January 08 2017 02:37 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote: Do the teams have to give up their starting players beforehand? or do they decide on the spot during this interview?
has to be beforehand otherwise you could just wait for the opponent to announce his player and choose yours
I am sure ogaming thought of that, aeromi is on top of that!
On January 08 2017 02:37 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote: Do the teams have to give up their starting players beforehand? or do they decide on the spot during this interview?
has to be beforehand otherwise you could just wait for the opponent to announce his player and choose yours
Starting players are decided before the interview.
On January 08 2017 03:39 SetGuitarsToKill wrote: Seriously what happened there. Semper was playing amazing and then went full foreigner in a split second and lost absolutely everything
On January 08 2017 03:40 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote: Neeb wasn't as behind as Funka made it seem imo
B4 was cancel 3/2 was 100s away for Semper all he had to do was fallback liberty zone his B5 (hell even his finished plantery B4) and game was over, neeb with no eco no mobility he could have drop the hell out of him (no mothership core)
On January 08 2017 03:40 EatingBomber wrote: Did Semper employ the Polt TvP build with Liberator range and very late upgrades?
Something to that effect. Although I saw other Koreans use that build long before I ever saw Polt do it.
Yeah, but Polt did it every TvP and it is very specific: 2-1-1 into 3 Medivacs at Protoss' 3rd and then Fusion Core + 2nd Starport immediately after the 5th and 6th Refineries; turtle to 6-8 Liberators and then kill the Protoss 4th, while getting 4th CC and armoury upgrades
I didn't know other Koreans did it though, but I think it might be fair to say polt popularised his version, although nobody used it in kr lol
On January 08 2017 03:40 EatingBomber wrote: Did Semper employ the Polt TvP build with Liberator range and very late upgrades?
Something to that effect. Although I saw other Koreans use that build long before I ever saw Polt do it.
Yeah, but Polt did it every TvP and it is very specific: 2-1-1 into 3 Medivacs at Protoss' 3rd and then Fusion Core + 2nd Starport immediately after the 5th and 6th Refineries; turtle to 6-8 Liberators and then kill the Protoss 4th, while getting 4th CC and armoury upgrades
that wasn't 2-1-1, it's a more popular 1-1-1 8 marine drop into 3 WM drop opening
On January 08 2017 03:40 EatingBomber wrote: Did Semper employ the Polt TvP build with Liberator range and very late upgrades?
Something to that effect. Although I saw other Koreans use that build long before I ever saw Polt do it.
Yeah, but Polt did it every TvP and it is very specific: 2-1-1 into 3 Medivacs at Protoss' 3rd and then Fusion Core + 2nd Starport immediately after the 5th and 6th Refineries; turtle to 6-8 Liberators and then kill the Protoss 4th, while getting 4th CC and armoury upgrades
On January 08 2017 03:40 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote: Neeb wasn't as behind as Funka made it seem imo
B4 was cancel 3/2 was 100s away for Semper all he had to do was fallback liberty zone his B5 (hell even his finished plantery B4) and game was over, neeb with no eco no mobility he could have drop the hell out of him (no mothership core)
Yeah ok I guess drops would be very hard to stop with his immobility
On January 08 2017 03:40 EatingBomber wrote: Did Semper employ the Polt TvP build with Liberator range and very late upgrades?
Something to that effect. Although I saw other Koreans use that build long before I ever saw Polt do it.
Yeah, but Polt did it every TvP and it is very specific: 2-1-1 into 3 Medivacs at Protoss' 3rd and then Fusion Core + 2nd Starport immediately after the 5th and 6th Refineries; turtle to 6-8 Liberators and then kill the Protoss 4th, while getting 4th CC and armoury upgrades
He didn't open 2-1-1.
Semper or Polt? Because I'm quite sure polt does 2-1-1, or at least used to
On January 08 2017 03:40 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote: Neeb wasn't as behind as Funka made it seem imo
B4 was cancel 3/2 was 100s away for Semper all he had to do was fallback liberty zone his B5 (hell even his finished plantery B4) and game was over, neeb with no eco no mobility he could have drop the hell out of him (no mothership core)
Yeah ok I guess drops would be hard to stop
He should have never ever won an army fight either, I dunno what Semper was doing.
On January 08 2017 03:40 EatingBomber wrote: Did Semper employ the Polt TvP build with Liberator range and very late upgrades?
Something to that effect. Although I saw other Koreans use that build long before I ever saw Polt do it.
Yeah, but Polt did it every TvP and it is very specific: 2-1-1 into 3 Medivacs at Protoss' 3rd and then Fusion Core + 2nd Starport immediately after the 5th and 6th Refineries; turtle to 6-8 Liberators and then kill the Protoss 4th, while getting 4th CC and armoury upgrades
He didn't open 2-1-1.
Semper or Polt? Because I'm quite sure polt does 2-1-1
semper, and yes polt used to open 2-1-1 but that's a long time ago for sc2 standards
On January 08 2017 03:52 GumBa wrote: Has korea been taking this event seriously? I just saw canada beat them.
Shura is a literal goddess, Innovation and Byun are in the worst slumps of all time and they're lucky they're not on the same side of the bracket as Canada.
On January 08 2017 03:52 GumBa wrote: Has korea been taking this event seriously? I just saw canada beat them.
Shura is a literal goddess, Innovation and Byun are in the worst slumps of all time and they're lucky they're not on the same side of the bracket as Canada.
SHURA is gonna win GSL. Though tbf GSL is basically a playhem nowadays.
On January 08 2017 03:52 GumBa wrote: Has korea been taking this event seriously? I just saw canada beat them.
Shura is a literal goddess, Innovation and Byun are in the worst slumps of all time and they're lucky they're not on the same side of the bracket as Canada.
SHURA is gonna win GSL. Though tbf GSL is basically a playhem nowadays.
A retirement home for people who used to be good a few years ago.
On January 08 2017 04:03 SetGuitarsToKill wrote: GJ Scarlett :D
Shame she won't be able to go to France :/
At least we have Jason
This is kinda unfair -_- i mean they won fair and square but in the end the team going to paris is way weaker... Would be fun to see Jason play there though haha
On January 08 2017 04:03 SetGuitarsToKill wrote: GJ Scarlett :D
Shame she won't be able to go to France :/
At least we have Jason
This is kinda unfair -_- i mean they won fair and square but in the end the team going to paris is way weaker... Would be fun to see Jason play there though haha
On January 08 2017 04:15 OWIMS wrote: So Nation Wars is Jan 21 and Scarlet's GSL Match is Jan 21 how is that going to work?
She plays GSL. She didn't tell Afreeca about NationWars because she thought Canada wouldn't get out of the group stage. So she accepts that she can't get it changed now.
On January 08 2017 04:35 ArtyK wrote: nerchio pool first but no 3 rax reaper, already good for thermy
pool first is standard build in kr zvt right now even vs no 3rax x_x
for what reason if i may ask?
you send your lings around to try and stop the scv building the cc at the natural I think. But it doesnt work on that map so idk...
hence my question
you dont need to make 6 lings for the first reaper + speed finishes faster (kr zergs make 19 drones before the queen and pair of lings also rather than 18 when euro zergs open pool first).
also yes incase they go 3rax or proxy reapers its much better
i would agree this is the worst map for it but uthermal really likes reapers so might as well be safe
On January 08 2017 06:03 TheDougler wrote: Thank goodness! They may have beaten us at "hockey" but at least we got those damn Yanks when it counts! (... )
On January 08 2017 06:03 TheDougler wrote: Thank goodness! They may have beaten us at "hockey" but at least we got those damn Yanks when it counts! (... )
Shootouts are bullshit and don't belong in playoff hockey
On January 08 2017 06:03 TheDougler wrote: Thank goodness! They may have beaten us at "hockey" but at least we got those damn Yanks when it counts! (... )
Shootouts are bullshit and don't belong in playoff hockey
On January 08 2017 06:03 TheDougler wrote: Thank goodness! They may have beaten us at "hockey" but at least we got those damn Yanks when it counts! (... )
Shootouts are bullshit and don't belong in playoff hockey
On January 08 2017 06:05 KeksX wrote: So now we fight over who gets rekt by korea next round.
u mean who gets the free win vs korea
Remember finals will be played offline
Even easier then.
Maybe for Stephano T_T Not for Germany though!
On January 08 2017 06:06 Makro wrote:
On January 08 2017 06:05 KeksX wrote: So now we fight over who gets rekt by korea at the finals
korea is doable right now, the gap is closed
Not for me! Korea bias is strong with me.
have faith in germany and showtime
imo 4-2 for germany right now and 47.58% of chance winning against korea after that
To be honest I like all of Germany's players. All of them can definitely beat a Korean or two. I'm just worried about Koreans preparing for / sniping them in the offline finals.
On January 08 2017 06:05 KeksX wrote: So now we fight over who gets rekt by korea next round.
u mean who gets the free win vs korea
Remember finals will be played offline
Even easier then.
Maybe for Stephano T_T Not for Germany though!
On January 08 2017 06:06 Makro wrote:
On January 08 2017 06:05 KeksX wrote: So now we fight over who gets rekt by korea at the finals
korea is doable right now, the gap is closed
Not for me! Korea bias is strong with me.
have faith in germany and showtime
imo 4-2 for germany right now and 47.58% of chance winning against korea after that
To be honest I like all of Germany's players. All of them can definitely beat a Korean or two. I'm just worried about really preparing for / sniping them in the offline finals.
On January 08 2017 06:05 KeksX wrote: So now we fight over who gets rekt by korea next round.
u mean who gets the free win vs korea
Remember finals will be played offline
Even easier then.
Maybe for Stephano T_T Not for Germany though!
On January 08 2017 06:06 Makro wrote:
On January 08 2017 06:05 KeksX wrote: So now we fight over who gets rekt by korea at the finals
korea is doable right now, the gap is closed
Not for me! Korea bias is strong with me.
have faith in germany and showtime
imo 4-2 for germany right now and 47.58% of chance winning against korea after that
To be honest I like all of Germany's players. All of them can definitely beat a Korean or two. I'm just worried about really preparing for / sniping them in the offline finals.
On January 08 2017 06:07 GumBa wrote:
On January 08 2017 06:06 KeksX wrote:
On January 08 2017 06:06 GumBa wrote:
On January 08 2017 06:06 KeksX wrote:
On January 08 2017 06:05 GumBa wrote:
On January 08 2017 06:05 KeksX wrote: So now we fight over who gets rekt by korea next round.
u mean who gets the free win vs korea
Remember finals will be played offline
Even easier then.
Maybe for Stephano T_T Not for Germany though!
Korea is straight up garbage. They didnt win a single WCS event last year.
I'm not sure if/how you are trolling! But I'm amused so it's working!
Meet GumBa
Nr.1 Shitposter
undeserving of that rank, he disappeared. doesn't even cheer for innovation. probably watches overwatch or something
On January 08 2017 06:05 KeksX wrote: So now we fight over who gets rekt by korea next round.
u mean who gets the free win vs korea
Remember finals will be played offline
Even easier then.
Maybe for Stephano T_T Not for Germany though!
On January 08 2017 06:06 Makro wrote:
On January 08 2017 06:05 KeksX wrote: So now we fight over who gets rekt by korea at the finals
korea is doable right now, the gap is closed
Not for me! Korea bias is strong with me.
have faith in germany and showtime
imo 4-2 for germany right now and 47.58% of chance winning against korea after that
To be honest I like all of Germany's players. All of them can definitely beat a Korean or two. I'm just worried about really preparing for / sniping them in the offline finals.
On January 08 2017 06:07 GumBa wrote:
On January 08 2017 06:06 KeksX wrote:
On January 08 2017 06:06 GumBa wrote:
On January 08 2017 06:06 KeksX wrote:
On January 08 2017 06:05 GumBa wrote:
On January 08 2017 06:05 KeksX wrote: So now we fight over who gets rekt by korea next round.
u mean who gets the free win vs korea
Remember finals will be played offline
Even easier then.
Maybe for Stephano T_T Not for Germany though!
Korea is straight up garbage. They didnt win a single WCS event last year.
I'm not sure if/how you are trolling! But I'm amused so it's working!
Meet GumBa
Nr.1 Shitposter
undeserving of that rank, he disappeared. doesn't even cheer for innovation. probably watches overwatch or something
Major was never losing this game, Showtime was just delaying the inevetable push/aggression that would kill him. And because he has such great control he could do it for a long time.
Major had 22 SCVs on the fourth - Terran will never lose that.
On January 08 2017 07:59 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote: Ignite blue flame afterburners
This is actually what happens when you research Caduceus Reactor. It's been in the game since the beginning of LotV, but no one has noticed yet.
It's not Caduceus Reactor anymore, it's High Capacity Fuel Tanks. I've seen it used in exactly one professional game in its entire existence I think. It's really cool but way too niche
On January 08 2017 07:59 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote: Ignite blue flame afterburners
This is actually what happens when you research Caduceus Reactor. It's been in the game since the beginning of LotV, but no one has noticed yet.
It's not Caduceus Reactor anymore, it's High Capacity Fuel Tanks. I've seen it used in exactly one professional game in its entire existence I think. It's really cool but way too niche
That's like once more time than Apial Sensor was used in all of BW.
On January 08 2017 07:59 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote: Ignite blue flame afterburners
This is actually what happens when you research Caduceus Reactor. It's been in the game since the beginning of LotV, but no one has noticed yet.
It's not Caduceus Reactor anymore, it's High Capacity Fuel Tanks. I've seen it used in exactly one professional game in its entire existence I think. It's really cool but way too niche
That's like once more time than Apial Sensor was used in all of BW.
And to this day I remain convinced TY got the upgrade by accident but then just ran with it and it won him the game.
On January 08 2017 08:10 KeksX wrote: This game. At one point in time TLO was behind more than 30 supply, even though major donated so many units. And then TLO just crushes him anyway.
Good for Team Germany though! =D
my 4-2 prediction worked out well as you see i'm an expert on that matter
On January 08 2017 08:10 KeksX wrote: This game. At one point in time TLO was behind more than 30 supply, even though major donated so many units. And then TLO just crushes him anyway.
Good for Team Germany though! =D
my 4-2 prediction worked out well as you see i'm an expert on that matter
On January 08 2017 07:59 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote: Ignite blue flame afterburners
This is actually what happens when you research Caduceus Reactor. It's been in the game since the beginning of LotV, but no one has noticed yet.
It's not Caduceus Reactor anymore, it's High Capacity Fuel Tanks. I've seen it used in exactly one professional game in its entire existence I think. It's really cool but way too niche
That's like once more time than Apial Sensor was used in all of BW.
And to this day I remain convinced TY got the upgrade by accident but then just ran with it and it won him the game.
On January 08 2017 08:10 KeksX wrote: This game. At one point in time TLO was behind more than 30 supply, even though major donated so many units. And then TLO just crushes him anyway.
Good for Team Germany though! =D
my 4-2 prediction worked out well as you see i'm an expert on that matter
On January 08 2017 08:10 KeksX wrote: This game. At one point in time TLO was behind more than 30 supply, even though major donated so many units. And then TLO just crushes him anyway.
Good for Team Germany though! =D
my 4-2 prediction worked out well as you see i'm an expert on that matter
Which player was the most tilted?
I'm no expert like Makro but I'd say uThermal :/
yea even his twitter game was really low he was clearly tilted
On January 08 2017 07:59 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote: Ignite blue flame afterburners
This is actually what happens when you research Caduceus Reactor. It's been in the game since the beginning of LotV, but no one has noticed yet.
It's not Caduceus Reactor anymore, it's High Capacity Fuel Tanks. I've seen it used in exactly one professional game in its entire existence I think. It's really cool but way too niche
That's like once more time than Apial Sensor was used in all of BW.
And to this day I remain convinced TY got the upgrade by accident but then just ran with it and it won him the game.
If Blizzard would just increase the cost of banshee cloak back to 200/200 like in WoL we'd see it more due to players forgetting to cancel while going for those fake-banshee-cloak builds.
On January 08 2017 07:59 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote: Ignite blue flame afterburners
This is actually what happens when you research Caduceus Reactor. It's been in the game since the beginning of LotV, but no one has noticed yet.
It's not Caduceus Reactor anymore, it's High Capacity Fuel Tanks. I've seen it used in exactly one professional game in its entire existence I think. It's really cool but way too niche
That's like once more time than Apial Sensor was used in all of BW.
And to this day I remain convinced TY got the upgrade by accident but then just ran with it and it won him the game.
On January 08 2017 08:20 Elentos wrote: Actually bearded people are now the majority in Team Germany so I guess the question is why Heromarine doesn't have one.
On January 08 2017 07:59 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote: Ignite blue flame afterburners
This is actually what happens when you research Caduceus Reactor. It's been in the game since the beginning of LotV, but no one has noticed yet.
It's not Caduceus Reactor anymore, it's High Capacity Fuel Tanks. I've seen it used in exactly one professional game in its entire existence I think. It's really cool but way too niche
That's like once more time than Apial Sensor was used in all of BW.
And to this day I remain convinced TY got the upgrade by accident but then just ran with it and it won him the game.
On January 08 2017 08:20 Elentos wrote: Actually bearded people are now the majority in Team Germany so I guess the question is why Heromarine doesn't have one.
isn't he like 10
He's 19
But his id was Shinichi once, that disqualifies you for a beard I think.
On January 08 2017 08:20 Elentos wrote: Actually bearded people are now the majority in Team Germany so I guess the question is why Heromarine doesn't have one.
On January 08 2017 08:20 Elentos wrote: Actually bearded people are now the majority in Team Germany so I guess the question is why Heromarine doesn't have one.
On January 08 2017 08:20 Elentos wrote: Actually bearded people are now the majority in Team Germany so I guess the question is why Heromarine doesn't have one.
On January 08 2017 08:20 Elentos wrote: Actually bearded people are now the majority in Team Germany so I guess the question is why Heromarine doesn't have one.
On January 08 2017 06:05 KeksX wrote: So now we fight over who gets rekt by korea next round.
u mean who gets the free win vs korea
Remember finals will be played offline
Even easier then.
Maybe for Stephano T_T Not for Germany though!
Korea is straight up garbage. They didnt win a single WCS event last year.
korea won the global finals. shitty troll is shitty ;P
Global finals aren't a WCS event. But it still doesn't work since TRUE won WCS Montreal.
yeah i forgot about the koreigners, but the global finals are a WCS event. they're called WCS global finals :D (http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/2016_WCS_Global_Playoffs_and_Finals)
On January 08 2017 06:05 KeksX wrote: So now we fight over who gets rekt by korea next round.
u mean who gets the free win vs korea
Remember finals will be played offline
Even easier then.
Maybe for Stephano T_T Not for Germany though!
Korea is straight up garbage. They didnt win a single WCS event last year.
korea won the global finals. shitty troll is shitty ;P
Global finals aren't a WCS event. But it still doesn't work since TRUE won WCS Montreal.
yeah i forgot about the koreigners, but the global finals are a WCS event. they're called WCS global finals :D (http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/2016_WCS_Global_Playoffs_and_Finals)
I'd argue that the key criterion for being a WCS event is giving WCS points, and the global finals do not give WCS points. Not that it matters.
On January 08 2017 06:05 KeksX wrote: So now we fight over who gets rekt by korea next round.
u mean who gets the free win vs korea
Remember finals will be played offline
Even easier then.
Maybe for Stephano T_T Not for Germany though!
Korea is straight up garbage. They didnt win a single WCS event last year.
korea won the global finals. shitty troll is shitty ;P
Global finals aren't a WCS event. But it still doesn't work since TRUE won WCS Montreal.
yeah i forgot about the koreigners, but the global finals are a WCS event. they're called WCS global finals :D (http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/2016_WCS_Global_Playoffs_and_Finals)
I'd argue that the key criterion for being a WCS event is giving WCS points, and the global finals do not give WCS points. Not that it matters.
kinda hard to argue that the !!! WCS !!! global finals arent a WCS event. its the final event of the WCS circuit, so you earn points in the other events to get there. i dont even know why someone would argue against that when its literally in the name lol
EPT
![[image loading]](http://www.flags.net/images/smallflags/NORW0001.GIF)
Snute 
Scythe 
Evire - Sub ![[image loading]](http://www.flags.net/images/smallflags/SKOR0001.GIF)
![[image loading]](http://www.flags.net/images/smallflags/CANA0001.GIF)
![[image loading]](http://www.flags.net/images/smallflags/UNST0001.GIF)
![[image loading]](http://www.flags.net/images/smallflags/NETH0001.GIF)
Genix![[image loading]](http://www.flags.net/images/smallflags/POLA0001.GIF)
![[image loading]](http://www.flags.net/images/smallflags/MEXC0001.GIF)
![[image loading]](http://www.flags.net/images/smallflags/GERM0001.GIF)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/d51LoLk.jpg)
![[image loading]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fa/William_I%2C_Prince_of_Orange_by_Adriaen_Thomasz._Key_Rijksmuseum_Amsterdam_SK-A-3148.jpg/1920px-William_I%2C_Prince_of_Orange_by_Adriaen_Thomasz._Key_Rijksmuseum_Amsterdam_SK-A-3148.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.vicesports.nl/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Robben1-1600x637.jpg)
