[S2SL] Season 1 2016 - Losers Round 2 - Page 22
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Heartland
Sweden24578 Posts
| ||
mCon.Hephaistas
Netherlands891 Posts
Well luckily he's also fucking up this game :p | ||
Sif_
Brazil3106 Posts
doesnt even have his main and natural connected..and its not like classic was actively denying it lol | ||
Durnuu
13319 Posts
| ||
Heartland
Sweden24578 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On February 18 2016 20:52 Heartland wrote: In situations like these I wonder if not Disruptors are better than Storm i'd say so | ||
Heartland
Sweden24578 Posts
| ||
Ludwigvan
Germany2364 Posts
| ||
Heartland
Sweden24578 Posts
| ||
Isualin
Turkey1903 Posts
| ||
Heartland
Sweden24578 Posts
| ||
Ramiz1989
12124 Posts
On February 18 2016 20:52 Heartland wrote: In situations like these I wonder if not Disruptors are better than Storm They are definitely better... it takes 3 Storms to kill a Lurker lol. | ||
Elentos
55456 Posts
| ||
deacon.frost
Czech Republic12128 Posts
| ||
esdf
Croatia736 Posts
| ||
seemsgood
5527 Posts
On February 18 2016 20:50 Heartland wrote: shit one million lurkers It scale in supply better than immortal.Zerg used to struggle when protoss reach high immortal count but now they just en masses lurker and bem. Problem solve. | ||
RvB
Netherlands6190 Posts
| ||
Penev
28440 Posts
| ||
mCon.Hephaistas
Netherlands891 Posts
On February 18 2016 20:55 deacon.frost wrote: Why Classic stays with immortals / storm against this absurd numbers of lurkers? He took his fourth way too late, he couldn't transition to tempest | ||
Heartland
Sweden24578 Posts
On February 18 2016 20:55 Ramiz1989 wrote: They are definitely better... it takes 3 Storms to kill a Lurker lol. Storms are probably good if you're about to attack across the line, but when you're being sieged it's not as good | ||
| ||