|
On May 10 2015 06:14 Thezzy wrote:Show nested quote +On May 10 2015 06:13 Strela wrote:On May 10 2015 06:12 Tiaraju9 wrote:On May 10 2015 06:12 Ctesias wrote:On May 10 2015 06:10 KingAlphard wrote:On May 10 2015 06:10 Charoisaur wrote:On May 10 2015 06:06 VeNoM HaZ Skill wrote: Playing best PvTer on earth. Go quick third and lose to insanely good decision making and micro.
"HEY GUYS! GUYS LISTEN! GUYS! MECH SUCKS! GUYS!"
The tears are real. there is a reason nobody plays mech at the pro level... It's weaker than bio but that doesn't mean that it SUX. It is considerably weaker, which actually means it does suck. Anything in this game is weaker than bio, including mech. Bio, mech. What else is there? Sky Terran and Biomech. Sadly, High Templar, Phoenix and Tempests murder Sky Terran hard. Oh right sky Terran, damn we don't see that often enough.
|
On May 10 2015 06:14 brickrd wrote:Show nested quote +On May 10 2015 06:13 dazed25 wrote:On May 10 2015 06:11 Yorkie wrote: Not every comp should be viable in every matchup LOL. "Siege tanks were good vs toss in BW therefore they should be good in sc2" is a shit argument i've seen some players make siege tanks work in bio composition vs toss. but it's really rare and mostly depends on exploiting maps and positioning. siege tanks are for people who want RTS to be TBS anyway lol, its a horrible unit. "i took a good position and sieged therefore i deserve to win fights and win the game!"
Are you daft?
|
On May 10 2015 06:15 The_Templar wrote: Does Gumiho ever open normally?
This is normal to him.
|
On May 10 2015 06:15 Serimek wrote:Show nested quote +On May 10 2015 06:11 TheDwf wrote:On May 10 2015 06:09 PoP wrote: Gumiho decided to lose the game the moment he unsieged for absolutely no reason. Everything went downward from that point on GuMiho decided to lose the game the moment he skipped stim Excuse-me for my question, I'm just a nobody here, but are you actually Downfall the gm French terran player ? I always read your alias "TheDwarf" for I don't know which reason before tonight ^_^ Yes, it's me
|
On May 10 2015 06:13 TheDwf wrote:Show nested quote +On May 10 2015 06:11 Yorkie wrote: Not every comp should be viable in every matchup LOL. "Siege tanks were good vs toss in BW therefore they should be good in sc2" is a shit argument Here we go, the usual super short-sighted remarks You got it man. Keep fighting the good fight against us short-sighted plebs
|
On May 10 2015 06:14 Yorkie wrote: Ugh roach hydra doesn't work against bio terran blizzard why can't you fix that my favorite comp should always be viable because I said so and because hydras were good in ZvT in brood war
Except it does work? Just ask Fantasy.
|
On May 10 2015 06:13 stuchiu wrote:Show nested quote +On May 10 2015 06:08 Wintex wrote:On May 10 2015 06:07 stuchiu wrote:On May 10 2015 06:07 Wintex wrote: man, this is something true kespa terrans would do way better. kespa terrans just pull scvs. XDDDD damn it stuchiu, i mean mech. and i used the word "would" :p They've had 3 years to use mech in TvP if they wanted to. They dont. They pull scvs. Maybe that's just their take on it. I mean SCV's are BIO AND Mech
|
On May 10 2015 06:13 Ej_ wrote:Show nested quote +On May 10 2015 06:12 Charoisaur wrote:On May 10 2015 06:10 KingAlphard wrote:On May 10 2015 06:10 Charoisaur wrote:On May 10 2015 06:06 VeNoM HaZ Skill wrote: Playing best PvTer on earth. Go quick third and lose to insanely good decision making and micro.
"HEY GUYS! GUYS LISTEN! GUYS! MECH SUCKS! GUYS!"
The tears are real. there is a reason nobody plays mech at the pro level... It's weaker than bio but that doesn't mean that it SUX. LOL, where is your proof for that? I can also say mass oracle phoenix doesn't suck vs terran and protoss players just don't play that because collossus builds are better. maybe if you weren't [here I edited out some insults] you'd notice that a progamer chose mech as his strategy vs the best PvT player in the world a thing happened, therefore it was good. it doesn't matter at all whether it worked or was effective or resulted in a win because a progamer did it. anything a progamer does is correct. both players win every game, there are no losses
|
On May 10 2015 06:15 PoP wrote:Show nested quote +On May 10 2015 06:14 brickrd wrote: siege tanks are for people who want RTS to be TBS anyway lol, its a horrible unit. "i took a good position and sieged therefore i deserve to win fights and win the game!" Are you even serious? No one is ever serious in LR's these days, unless they're seriously salty
|
On May 10 2015 06:16 brickrd wrote:Show nested quote +On May 10 2015 06:13 Ej_ wrote:On May 10 2015 06:12 Charoisaur wrote:On May 10 2015 06:10 KingAlphard wrote:On May 10 2015 06:10 Charoisaur wrote:On May 10 2015 06:06 VeNoM HaZ Skill wrote: Playing best PvTer on earth. Go quick third and lose to insanely good decision making and micro.
"HEY GUYS! GUYS LISTEN! GUYS! MECH SUCKS! GUYS!"
The tears are real. there is a reason nobody plays mech at the pro level... It's weaker than bio but that doesn't mean that it SUX. LOL, where is your proof for that? I can also say mass oracle phoenix doesn't suck vs terran and protoss players just don't play that because collossus builds are better. maybe if you weren't [here I edited out some insults] you'd notice that a progamer chose mech as his strategy vs the best PvT player in the world a thing happened, therefore it was good. it doesn't matter at all whether it worked or was effective or resulted in a win because a progamer did it. anything a progamer does is correct. both players win every game, there are no losses obviosuly all of them just fucking wing it live
|
On May 10 2015 06:15 shabby wrote:Show nested quote +On May 10 2015 06:14 brickrd wrote:On May 10 2015 06:13 dazed25 wrote:On May 10 2015 06:11 Yorkie wrote: Not every comp should be viable in every matchup LOL. "Siege tanks were good vs toss in BW therefore they should be good in sc2" is a shit argument i've seen some players make siege tanks work in bio composition vs toss. but it's really rare and mostly depends on exploiting maps and positioning. siege tanks are for people who want RTS to be TBS anyway lol, its a horrible unit. "i took a good position and sieged therefore i deserve to win fights and win the game!" I really hope you weren't around for the GomTvT era.
2011 was a good year
|
On May 10 2015 06:15 bjornkavist wrote:Show nested quote +On May 10 2015 06:14 brickrd wrote:On May 10 2015 06:13 dazed25 wrote:On May 10 2015 06:11 Yorkie wrote: Not every comp should be viable in every matchup LOL. "Siege tanks were good vs toss in BW therefore they should be good in sc2" is a shit argument i've seen some players make siege tanks work in bio composition vs toss. but it's really rare and mostly depends on exploiting maps and positioning. siege tanks are for people who want RTS to be TBS anyway lol, its a horrible unit. "i took a good position and sieged therefore i deserve to win fights and win the game!" Are you daft? nope, i'm pretty spot-on
|
that poor marine. what a way to die
|
your Country52797 Posts
Wow, Gumiho is going bio this time :O
|
On May 10 2015 06:16 Noonius wrote:Show nested quote +On May 10 2015 06:15 shabby wrote:On May 10 2015 06:14 brickrd wrote:On May 10 2015 06:13 dazed25 wrote:On May 10 2015 06:11 Yorkie wrote: Not every comp should be viable in every matchup LOL. "Siege tanks were good vs toss in BW therefore they should be good in sc2" is a shit argument i've seen some players make siege tanks work in bio composition vs toss. but it's really rare and mostly depends on exploiting maps and positioning. siege tanks are for people who want RTS to be TBS anyway lol, its a horrible unit. "i took a good position and sieged therefore i deserve to win fights and win the game!" I really hope you weren't around for the GomTvT era. 2011 was a good year The best year.
|
On May 10 2015 06:16 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:Show nested quote +On May 10 2015 06:15 PoP wrote:On May 10 2015 06:14 brickrd wrote: siege tanks are for people who want RTS to be TBS anyway lol, its a horrible unit. "i took a good position and sieged therefore i deserve to win fights and win the game!" Are you even serious? No one is ever serious in LR's these days, unless they're seriously salty
Are you kidding me?!
|
On May 10 2015 06:17 The_Templar wrote: Wow, Gumiho is going bio this time :O Good players learn from their mistakes.
|
Nice defense by Parting. Bit weird his worker count is not better. Must have cut a bit,
|
On May 10 2015 06:13 stuchiu wrote:Show nested quote +On May 10 2015 06:08 Wintex wrote:On May 10 2015 06:07 stuchiu wrote:On May 10 2015 06:07 Wintex wrote: man, this is something true kespa terrans would do way better. kespa terrans just pull scvs. XDDDD damn it stuchiu, i mean mech. and i used the word "would" :p They've had 3 years to use mech in TvP if they wanted to. They dont. They pull scvs. one day. i will see ebb and flow of tvp move back to the beautiful feeling that is bw tvp
|
Damn sick defense from PartinG
|
|
|
|