EPT[WCS EU] RO16 Group D Premier Season 2 2013 - Page 33
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Zealously
East Gorteau22261 Posts
| ||
|
SinCitta
Germany2127 Posts
| ||
|
intotheheart
Canada33091 Posts
I don't think so, they looked like it was 3-0-0 for both. | ||
|
askmc70
United States722 Posts
On August 09 2013 05:01 IntoTheheart wrote: MC's actually reading the TL LR threads... he is reading play xp not tl | ||
|
intotheheart
Canada33091 Posts
Aww.  | ||
|
DidYuhim
Ukraine1905 Posts
On August 09 2013 05:00 c0ldfusion wrote: MC did spent similar amount of supply defending his third - I believe 2 archons, 2 stalkers and a couple of zealots. The thing is, Titan shouldn't have split his army like that. MC can pull his units at his third since he's the one defending. But the trick was that Colossi needed a buffer to live long enough for them to kill everything. Also, Titan had some supply on his own third, chasing warp prism around. | ||
|
Nimelrian
Germany142 Posts
| ||
|
RagingDragon
United States233 Posts
On August 09 2013 05:00 Dingodile wrote: lost two collosi because of mineral patches... blizz has to fix this. Seconded. That seems like a no-brainer Blizzard, wtf. | ||
|
WhurreOdu
Austria1739 Posts
I think MC had armor+1 and TITAN had no armor upgrades. | ||
|
FFW_Rude
France10201 Posts
| ||
|
c0ldfusion
United States8293 Posts
On August 09 2013 05:01 IntoTheheart wrote: I don't think so, they looked like it was 3-0-0 for both. OK, it was just positioning. MC lost way fewer zealots in that engagement than I expected then. | ||
|
intotheheart
Canada33091 Posts
On August 09 2013 05:02 FFW_Rude wrote: Can someone explain to me why the casters said that 4colossi was better than the like 10immortals MC had ? The idea was that the core of MC's army was zealots and they would melt, and then the rest of the armies would even out, but one guy would have more AOE. | ||
|
DidYuhim
Ukraine1905 Posts
On August 09 2013 05:02 c0ldfusion wrote: OK, it was just positioning. MC lost way fewer zealots in that engagement than I expected then. MC had 3-2, Titan was on 3-1. You're right about upgrades, too. | ||
|
Fyzar
Netherlands8010 Posts
On August 09 2013 05:01 FFW_Rude wrote: Logged in to participate in the LR and only 32 pages ? Matches not good tonight ? No whiners in PvP  . | ||
|
intotheheart
Canada33091 Posts
On August 09 2013 05:02 c0ldfusion wrote: OK, it was just positioning. MC lost way fewer zealots in that engagement than I expected then. Likewise. I expected him to die right then and there. | ||
|
c0ldfusion
United States8293 Posts
On August 09 2013 05:02 WhurreOdu wrote: I think MC had armor+1 and TITAN had no armor upgrades. That makes a lot more sense. Armor upgrade differentials makes a huge difference in an engagement like that. | ||
|
FFW_Rude
France10201 Posts
On August 09 2013 05:03 IntoTheheart wrote: The idea was that the core of MC's army was zealots and they would melt, and then the rest of the armies would even out, but one guy would have more AOE. Ok but while the zealot melted the immortals was going to melt colossi. No ? | ||
|
jonich0n
United States1982 Posts
boss toos | ||
|
calh
537 Posts
| ||
|
FFW_Rude
France10201 Posts
Oh right PvP | ||
| ||
