On June 30 2013 08:29 Proseat wrote: Hm. Naniwa vs HuK coming up next? Although there already is a result up on Liquipedia?
Liquipedia isn't always correct. Anyone can edit it... even blatant fanboys.
In this case the person who introduced the error has made 140 edits to the results page and as far as I can see this is the only one that needed to be undone. Sometimes it is fanboyism, but in this case I would guess it was an error on the part of a person who was just trying to help, but somehow got fed wrong information.
Whatever happened here, the editor-approval system should be strong enough to catch it. If a faulty edit got through maybe the system needs to be stricter :/
It didn't get through. Users who have proven trustworthy can make edits without any approval, that is how wikis work. If a particular page is vandalized it can be locked, and users can have their privileges taken away (this particular user was given privileges because he makes helpful edits, even if he made 1 mistake). In this case the error was made at 8:08 and fixed at 8:09 so it wasn't really a big deal.
Ok, I wasn't around to see the whole story, sounds good then.
On June 30 2013 08:29 Proseat wrote: Hm. Naniwa vs HuK coming up next? Although there already is a result up on Liquipedia?
Liquipedia isn't always correct. Anyone can edit it... even blatant fanboys.
In this case the person who introduced the error has made 140 edits to the results page and as far as I can see this is the only one that needed to be undone. Sometimes it is fanboyism, but in this case I would guess it was an error on the part of a person who was just trying to help, but somehow got fed wrong information.
Whatever happened here, the editor-approval system should be strong enough to catch it. If a faulty edit got through maybe the system needs to be stricter :/
It's a community driven effort and no one is getting paid. Plus the error got pulled in a few minutes.