EPT[OSL] RO32 Group E&F WCS Korea Season 2 2013 - Page 97
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Aiobhill
Germany283 Posts
| ||
|
Abominous
Croatia1625 Posts
| ||
|
FrostedMiniWheats
United States30730 Posts
On June 25 2013 22:05 Wintex wrote: How was First? good shit? An unexpectedly strong PvZ. He kind of fell apart at times during the game with RorO but he straight up smashed Leenock. | ||
|
NightOfTheDead
Lithuania1711 Posts
| ||
|
c0ldfusion
United States8293 Posts
On June 25 2013 22:05 Wintex wrote: How was First? good shit? Executed a nasty sentry drop on Leenock. | ||
Shellshock
United States97274 Posts
On June 25 2013 22:05 robson1 wrote: Don't take this the wrong way but.... you probably won't tbh.  idk it's just a matter of getting your typing speed up and from there it's really not too bad. | ||
|
Abominous
Croatia1625 Posts
On June 25 2013 22:07 FrostedMiniWheats wrote: An unexpectedly strong PvZ. He kind of fell apart at times during the game with RorO but he straight up smashed Leenock. Well he only had to prepare one match-up. That one. | ||
|
SiroKO
France721 Posts
On June 25 2013 22:04 robson1 wrote: How. What? I can't even. Why are zerg players more hurt by Bo1 than other races. It makes literally no sense. Think harder. If a lesser Zerg player has more chance to advance in ZvZ (than for instance a Terran does in TvT...), then in the later rounds undeserving Zergs might face deserving Protoss/Terran and get crushed. | ||
|
Scarecrow
Korea (South)9172 Posts
On June 25 2013 22:05 DrPandaPhD wrote: Protoss relies a lot more on gimmicky build. Easier to prepare one than 7. Protoss has a lot more success in pro-league (bo1s) than they have in other tournaments with bo3s -> bo7s By that logic a Bo1 format was a good move to give us more racial balance. Anything that reduces the number of zergs is a good move. | ||
|
packrat386
United States5077 Posts
On June 25 2013 22:05 DrPandaPhD wrote: Protoss relies a lot more on gimmicky build. Easier to prepare one than 7. Protoss has a lot more success in pro-league (bo1s) than they have in other tournaments with bo3s -> bo7s I feel like that might also be because kespa have deep protoss benches as well. Like, it might just so happen that there are a lot of them. | ||
|
Abominous
Croatia1625 Posts
On June 25 2013 22:07 Shellshock1122 wrote: idk it's just a matter of getting your typing speed up and from there it's really not too bad. What's your WPM on 10fastfingers.com? | ||
|
robson1
3632 Posts
On June 25 2013 22:05 DrPandaPhD wrote: Protoss relies a lot more on gimmicky build. Easier to prepare one than 7. Protoss has a lot more success in pro-league (bo1s) than they have in other tournaments with bo3s -> bo7s You know that we'll have 5 zergs and 2 toss in the Ro16 so far? | ||
|
bo1b
Australia12814 Posts
On June 25 2013 22:07 FrostedMiniWheats wrote: An unexpectedly strong PvZ. He kind of fell apart at times during the game with RorO but he straight up smashed Leenock. To be fair that sort of strat either fails horribly or smashes. | ||
|
packrat386
United States5077 Posts
On June 25 2013 22:07 Shellshock1122 wrote: idk it's just a matter of getting your typing speed up and from there it's really not too bad. yeah I'm getting better at it. Also kind of knowing what stuff to focus on. | ||
|
Markwerf
Netherlands3728 Posts
| ||
|
robson1
3632 Posts
On June 25 2013 22:07 SiroKO wrote: Think harder. If a lesser Zerg player has more chance to advance in ZvZ (than for instance a Terran does in TvT...), then in the later rounds undeserving Zergs might face deserving Protoss/Terran and get crushed. Think harder yourself. PvP is just as volatile. With terran it might be slightly better. | ||
|
DrPandaPhD
5188 Posts
On June 25 2013 22:07 Scarecrow wrote: By that logic a Bo1 format was a good move to give us more racial balance. Anything that reduces the number of zergs is a good move. Yeah probably. I am not defending/arguing against bo1. I just explained why zerg usually have more problem in bo1s than toss | ||
|
Laryleprakon
New Zealand9496 Posts
On June 25 2013 22:08 robson1 wrote: You know that we'll have 5 zergs and 2 toss in the Ro16 so far? Look at the groups still to be played, it should even up. | ||
|
Rabiator
Germany3948 Posts
On June 25 2013 22:01 Grumbels wrote: What prevents you from having units in your main for the minute during which you are vulnerable to this strategy? What happens if the drop "comes late" and you have moved the defending units out? With the faster Warp Prism it *might be* viable to build 2-3 Warp Prisms and start with 4 Sentries and 4 Zealots. Warping in stuff takes time after all and this would add an element of surprise to it. With several Warp Prisms you could have one of them to warp in stuff and the other(s) could be used to micro and save your units. The only possibility seems to be a counter-attack and if you plan to use this strategy a tight wall and several cannons seems an easy enough defense. | ||
|
c0ldfusion
United States8293 Posts
Cool site! | ||
| ||
