|
On May 29 2013 20:22 chisuri wrote:Show nested quote +On May 29 2013 20:12 scr wrote:On May 29 2013 20:09 gTank wrote:
Is this Kespa > ESF nonsense still in fashion? ^^
I for one want to see fantasy in code S, mostly because of my liquibets >_> only when kespa players win. yesterday there was silence Yesterday there was 1 rockie KESPA vs 4 established eSF, some of them were greatly hyped. KESPA player scored 2-2, and finished 3rd. And he is an absolute no name but he ranked higher than 2 elite eSF. Today, well, you can see for yourself. And there is no baiting here. We are celebrating for KESPA win over worthless eSF. If only one of the three KESPA in this group was placed in yesterday group. Oh we can only wish. There is no fairness sometimes.
It's hilarious how some people are so far gone that they're baiting while simultaneously claiming that they're not baiting.
|
First time i have seen Savage play, his scouting is very impressive
|
On May 29 2013 20:24 Aven wrote:Show nested quote +On May 29 2013 20:23 Tsubbi wrote:
why the fuck would u ever do such a build on akilon, i just dont get what korean protosses are doing sometimes Yeah this is the map for protoss to macro on, out of all maps he chooses to 7 gate on it
Yeah, why the hell would you do something unpredictable in an RTS -.-
|
On May 29 2013 20:25 eGoRama wrote:Show nested quote +On May 29 2013 20:24 Bagi wrote:On May 29 2013 20:22 chisuri wrote:On May 29 2013 20:12 scr wrote:On May 29 2013 20:09 gTank wrote:
Is this Kespa > ESF nonsense still in fashion? ^^
I for one want to see fantasy in code S, mostly because of my liquibets >_> only when kespa players win. yesterday there was silence Yesterday there was 1 rockie KESPA vs 4 established eSF, some of them were greatly hyped. KESPA player scored 2-2, and finished 3rd. And he is an absolute no name but he ranked higher than 2 elite eSF. Today, well, you can see for yourself. And there is no baiting here. We are celebrating for KESPA win over worthless eSF. If only one of the three KESPA in this group was placed in yesterday group. Oh we can only wish. There is no fairness sometimes. Mega facepalm. ROFL, keep it up pls, it is hilarious
I particularly like the part where Ruin is an elite player.
|
United Kingdom12041 Posts
On May 29 2013 20:25 opterown wrote:Show nested quote +On May 29 2013 20:22 chisuri wrote:On May 29 2013 20:12 scr wrote:On May 29 2013 20:09 gTank wrote:
Is this Kespa > ESF nonsense still in fashion? ^^
I for one want to see fantasy in code S, mostly because of my liquibets >_> only when kespa players win. yesterday there was silence Yesterday there was 1 rockie KESPA vs 4 established eSF, some of them were greatly hyped. KESPA player scored 2-2, and finished 3rd. And he is an absolute no name but he ranked higher than 2 elite eSF. Today, well, you can see for yourself. And there is no baiting here. We are celebrating for KESPA win over worthless eSF. If only one of the three KESPA in this group was placed in yesterday group. Oh we can only wish. There is no fairness sometimes. worthless esf you're a joke
I must admit, for comedy value that post was pretty incredible.
I don't think people should really care about eSF or Kespa, either way they're all Korean and most of the time really good.
|
|
|
On May 29 2013 20:26 HolyArrow wrote:Show nested quote +On May 29 2013 20:22 chisuri wrote:On May 29 2013 20:12 scr wrote:On May 29 2013 20:09 gTank wrote:
Is this Kespa > ESF nonsense still in fashion? ^^
I for one want to see fantasy in code S, mostly because of my liquibets >_> only when kespa players win. yesterday there was silence Yesterday there was 1 rockie KESPA vs 4 established eSF, some of them were greatly hyped. KESPA player scored 2-2, and finished 3rd. And he is an absolute no name but he ranked higher than 2 elite eSF. Today, well, you can see for yourself. And there is no baiting here. We are celebrating for KESPA win over worthless eSF. If only one of the three KESPA in this group was placed in yesterday group. Oh we can only wish. There is no fairness sometimes. It's hilarious how some people are so far gone that they're baiting while simultaneously claiming that they're not baiting.
Can someone press the report button please? I'd love to but I don't have the button 
|
On May 29 2013 20:28 gobbledydook wrote:Show nested quote +On May 29 2013 20:26 HolyArrow wrote:On May 29 2013 20:22 chisuri wrote:On May 29 2013 20:12 scr wrote:On May 29 2013 20:09 gTank wrote:
Is this Kespa > ESF nonsense still in fashion? ^^
I for one want to see fantasy in code S, mostly because of my liquibets >_> only when kespa players win. yesterday there was silence Yesterday there was 1 rockie KESPA vs 4 established eSF, some of them were greatly hyped. KESPA player scored 2-2, and finished 3rd. And he is an absolute no name but he ranked higher than 2 elite eSF. Today, well, you can see for yourself. And there is no baiting here. We are celebrating for KESPA win over worthless eSF. If only one of the three KESPA in this group was placed in yesterday group. Oh we can only wish. There is no fairness sometimes. It's hilarious how some people are so far gone that they're baiting while simultaneously claiming that they're not baiting. Can someone press the report button please? I'd love to but I don't have the button
He got reported already.
|
Canada16217 Posts
On May 29 2013 20:22 chisuri wrote:Show nested quote +On May 29 2013 20:12 scr wrote:On May 29 2013 20:09 gTank wrote:
Is this Kespa > ESF nonsense still in fashion? ^^
I for one want to see fantasy in code S, mostly because of my liquibets >_> only when kespa players win. yesterday there was silence Yesterday there was 1 rockie KESPA vs 4 established eSF, some of them were greatly hyped. KESPA player scored 2-2, and finished 3rd. And he is an absolute no name but he ranked higher than 2 elite eSF.Today, well, you can see for yourself. And there is no baiting here. We are celebrating for KESPA win over worthless eSF. If only one of the three KESPA in this group was placed in yesterday group. Oh we can only wish. There is no fairness sometimes.
you call Ruin an established player? LOL oh man that's funny
|
On May 29 2013 20:25 kollin wrote:Show nested quote +On May 29 2013 20:22 Evil_Sheep wrote:On May 29 2013 20:16 bittman wrote:On May 29 2013 20:14 Evil_Sheep wrote:
Yoda is this group's DRG. Looks like Fanta + guy who's never won a televised game in hots go through... About "that guy": I don't follow PL closely and didn't follow B. Who is Savage? Is he notable for anything? AFAIK he's just another of those extremely average Kespa players/zergs which seem to be owning GSL lately... Qualifying != Owning
GSL = code S/A/B ...a lot of kespa non-stars/total nonames coming out of the woodwork, stepping over big names on their way to code S, I'd call it owning, yeah.
|
Holy crap, Yoda got destroyed. Didn't expect him to go down this way.
|
So much shitposting.
Ah well, glad to see Fantasy make it through, his macro is still iffy but he does seem to be slowly improving in most aspects of his play.
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On May 29 2013 20:30 Evil_Sheep wrote:Show nested quote +On May 29 2013 20:25 kollin wrote:On May 29 2013 20:22 Evil_Sheep wrote:On May 29 2013 20:16 bittman wrote:On May 29 2013 20:14 Evil_Sheep wrote:
Yoda is this group's DRG. Looks like Fanta + guy who's never won a televised game in hots go through... About "that guy": I don't follow PL closely and didn't follow B. Who is Savage? Is he notable for anything? AFAIK he's just another of those extremely average Kespa players/zergs which seem to be owning GSL lately... Qualifying != Owning GSL = code S/A/B ...a lot of kespa non-stars/total nonames coming out of the woodwork, stepping over big names on their way to code S, I'd call it owning, yeah.
well with an influx of a few hundred extra pros, you would expect a fair new no-names anyway. it wasn't so long ago that players like maru, parting, etc were no-names coming out of the woodwork stepping over big names too
|
Ohhh yes, my favorite topic after Korean/Foreigners is Kepsa/eSF. Please educate me. MORE!!!!
|
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
|
On May 29 2013 20:22 chisuri wrote:Show nested quote +On May 29 2013 20:12 scr wrote:On May 29 2013 20:09 gTank wrote:
Is this Kespa > ESF nonsense still in fashion? ^^
I for one want to see fantasy in code S, mostly because of my liquibets >_> only when kespa players win. yesterday there was silence Yesterday there was 1 rockie KESPA vs 4 established eSF, some of them were greatly hyped. KESPA player scored 2-2, and finished 3rd. And he is an absolute no name but he ranked higher than 2 elite eSF. Today, well, you can see for yourself. And there is no baiting here. We are celebrating for KESPA win over worthless eSF. If only one of the three KESPA in this group was placed in yesterday group. Oh we can only wish. There is no fairness sometimes.
So Ruin who didn't get past perlims in Code A is now established eSF player. Cute logic there, sir.
DRG didn't win anything in more than a year, you also completely ignore the type of player he is, but then whatever.
Nice troll, sir, I sincerely hope you're as witty in real life as you are on forums.
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On May 29 2013 20:35 DidYuhim wrote:Show nested quote +On May 29 2013 20:22 chisuri wrote:On May 29 2013 20:12 scr wrote:On May 29 2013 20:09 gTank wrote:
Is this Kespa > ESF nonsense still in fashion? ^^
I for one want to see fantasy in code S, mostly because of my liquibets >_> only when kespa players win. yesterday there was silence Yesterday there was 1 rockie KESPA vs 4 established eSF, some of them were greatly hyped. KESPA player scored 2-2, and finished 3rd. And he is an absolute no name but he ranked higher than 2 elite eSF. Today, well, you can see for yourself. And there is no baiting here. We are celebrating for KESPA win over worthless eSF. If only one of the three KESPA in this group was placed in yesterday group. Oh we can only wish. There is no fairness sometimes. So Ruin who didn't get past perlims in Code A is now established eSF player. Cute logic there, sir. DRG didn't win anything in more than a year, you also completely ignore the type of player he is, but then whatever. Nice troll, sir, I sincerely hope you're as witty in real life as you are on forums.
don't worry, he is also capable of gems like this
On May 15 2013 20:54 chisuri wrote:
Oh my God, how could they allow the last match to be eSF vs eSF? Free slot for one low-level player? All matches should have at least one Kespa player. Well I guess they must have some eSF players in somehow.
User was temp banned for this post.
|
ok his post is strongly biased, but lets be honest, kespa players seem to be overall the better ones right now.
there are a few top esf players who are on par maybe, but in generell kespa > esf ( i think everyone can agree on that)
|
On May 29 2013 20:36 opterown wrote:Show nested quote +On May 29 2013 20:35 DidYuhim wrote:On May 29 2013 20:22 chisuri wrote:On May 29 2013 20:12 scr wrote:On May 29 2013 20:09 gTank wrote:
Is this Kespa > ESF nonsense still in fashion? ^^
I for one want to see fantasy in code S, mostly because of my liquibets >_> only when kespa players win. yesterday there was silence Yesterday there was 1 rockie KESPA vs 4 established eSF, some of them were greatly hyped. KESPA player scored 2-2, and finished 3rd. And he is an absolute no name but he ranked higher than 2 elite eSF. Today, well, you can see for yourself. And there is no baiting here. We are celebrating for KESPA win over worthless eSF. If only one of the three KESPA in this group was placed in yesterday group. Oh we can only wish. There is no fairness sometimes. So Ruin who didn't get past perlims in Code A is now established eSF player. Cute logic there, sir. DRG didn't win anything in more than a year, you also completely ignore the type of player he is, but then whatever. Nice troll, sir, I sincerely hope you're as witty in real life as you are on forums. don't worry, he is also capable of gems like this Show nested quote +On May 15 2013 20:54 chisuri wrote:
Oh my God, how could they allow the last match to be eSF vs eSF? Free slot for one low-level player? All matches should have at least one Kespa player. Well I guess they must have some eSF players in somehow.
User was temp banned for this post.
Nah, the post he made today was much better by far.
Now that's a gem.
|
On May 29 2013 20:22 chisuri wrote:Show nested quote +On May 29 2013 20:12 scr wrote:On May 29 2013 20:09 gTank wrote:
Is this Kespa > ESF nonsense still in fashion? ^^
I for one want to see fantasy in code S, mostly because of my liquibets >_> only when kespa players win. yesterday there was silence Yesterday there was 1 rockie KESPA vs 4 established eSF, some of them were greatly hyped. KESPA player scored 2-2, and finished 3rd. And he is an absolute no name but he ranked higher than 2 elite eSF. Today, well, you can see for yourself. And there is no baiting here. We are celebrating for KESPA win over worthless eSF. If only one of the three KESPA in this group was placed in yesterday group. Oh we can only wish. There is no fairness sometimes.
Why couldnt you make 'And there is no baiting here. We are celebrating for KESPA win over worthless eSF.' one sentence to make it even more hillarious? :'-(
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
