On November 24 2012 04:07 Qbyx wrote: Why did Naniwa advance & not NightEnd? Same score, face to face result preffers NightEnd.
? Am I missing something?
Yeah, but face to face score doesn't matter when it's in fact a 3-way tie. Count in all the statistics in their games agsinst ForGG (Naniwa 2-0, NightEnd 1-2) and NaNiwa comes out on top.
Thx, missed the the fact that is 3 way tie, not two.
Why does the predicted outcome (Snute 2-3 TLO (18.96%)) differ from the most likely outcome (Snute 1-3 TLO (19.17%))?
"Predicted" does not necessarily mean "most likely."
I understand that, but just wondering is there a reason behind it? i.e. Meaning is that your own prediction? Or some other deeper reason? Just confused in what scenario that an algorithm would give different predicted outcome that is different from most likely outcome...
On November 24 2012 04:12 Kilby wrote: Terran bio. That is something I learned in early 2010. It is very good and with medivacs it beats the opponent. Thorzain was lucky to figure that out that in this game. Hopefully he will be able to do that in the next game as well.
maybe socke will figure out that if he sits on 2 base and makes 3 colossus he wins :o
On November 24 2012 03:24 Necosarius wrote: Get some Food for Louis while it's downtime. Surströmming motherfuckers!
And this is by the way the food that Incontrol agreed to eat if it was made available to him but unfortunately Naniwa was not able to get it through customs and bring to US. But now that Incontrol is actually in Sweden I think it would be a good time to make him pay for that promise.
Yeah we should all tweet Naniwa and Incontrol!
If you live near the Dreamhack location and have access to some Surströmming, please bring a can of that to Incontrol. Seriously. He already promised he would eat some in State of the Game if someone could bring it to him so now it's only a matter of someone bringing a can to him and filming the result. Please make it happen. Swedes this is about your national pride. Make it happen.
I guess Surströmming is not really someting you have in every supermarket if it causes some mass evacuations but still, would be awesome if you swedes could actually make this happen.
It's not the season for it and I'm not sure if they even sell it down there in the southern part of the country. Maybe they do, but it's surely not as popular.
Why does the predicted outcome (Snute 2-3 TLO (18.96%)) differ from the most likely outcome (Snute 1-3 TLO (19.17%))?
"Predicted" does not necessarily mean "most likely."
I understand that, but just wondering is there a reason behind it? i.e. Meaning is that your own prediction? Or some other deeper reason? Just confused in what scenario that an algorithm would give different predicted outcome that is different from most likely outcome...
Well, I just have to pick a good way of "predicting." What I'm doing is choosing the outcome that is least surprising, in the sense that it's equally likely (or as close as possible) that an outcome more extreme in one direction happens, as in the other direction. In a sense I'm picking whatever is in the middle of the bar.
I'm open to other suggestions. I used to use the most likely one but people were complaining that I always predicted 2-0's and not 2-1's.
On November 24 2012 04:12 Quateras wrote: Holy crap, the cast from Vasa (the italian caster) sounds amazingly energetic Only missing a big "goooooooooooooooooaaaaaal" at some point ^ _ ^
Loving Dreamhack for giving community casters some spotlight.
Holy shit Apollo and Incontrol are so good. They are totally on the same wavelenght. Rarely do I see that someone can actually realise and be casual with Incontrol's jokes but Apollo is right there. This is a good combo.
We have actually so many good caster duos that it's easily more than enough. If just the players could be as consistent so that the good players could always be good. But unfortunately that doesn't happen in real life. Slump is a real thing.
Why does the predicted outcome (Snute 2-3 TLO (18.96%)) differ from the most likely outcome (Snute 1-3 TLO (19.17%))?
"Predicted" does not necessarily mean "most likely."
I understand that, but just wondering is there a reason behind it? i.e. Meaning is that your own prediction? Or some other deeper reason? Just confused in what scenario that an algorithm would give different predicted outcome that is different from most likely outcome...
Added to my previous post... The fact that a 3-2 is predicted only reflects that the players are close in skill level, not some inherent belief that the match will necessarily take all five games.
On November 24 2012 04:12 Quateras wrote: Holy crap, the cast from Vasa (the italian caster) sounds amazingly energetic Only missing a big "goooooooooooooooooaaaaaal" at some point ^ _ ^
Loving Dreamhack for giving community casters some spotlight.
On November 24 2012 04:12 Quateras wrote: Holy crap, the cast from Vasa (the italian caster) sounds amazingly energetic Only missing a big "goooooooooooooooooaaaaaal" at some point ^ _ ^
Loving Dreamhack for giving community casters some spotlight.