EPTOn November 22 2012 11:27 Dexington wrote:
This is just for seeding, nobody is booted out.
This is just for seeding, nobody is booted out.
Does that mean that even if Vibe loses to MMA, he will still be able in the wildcard bracket...?
[NASL] Tie-Breaks/Wildcards Day 1 - Page 4
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Blargh
United States2103 Posts
Does that mean that even if Vibe loses to MMA, he will still be able in the wildcard bracket...? | ||
|
BathTubNZ
New Zealand2556 Posts
On November 22 2012 11:30 Blargh wrote: Does that mean that even if Vibe loses to MMA, he will still be able in the wildcard bracket...? Yeah, just a tie break for placement. | ||
|
Blargh
United States2103 Posts
Oh, I see now. I saw Arthur/Oz once and assumed that each of the tie-breakers being played mean the loser is out of the bracket. Thank you for clarification.  | ||
NASL.tv
699 Posts
On November 22 2012 11:30 Blargh wrote: Does that mean that even if Vibe loses to MMA, he will still be able in the wildcard bracket...? ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/uh62b.png) | ||
|
Dexington
Canada7276 Posts
Like, say Naniwa beats Oz. Would he go to face Polt, as the #16 seed, or would he go to play Arthur, like that graphic seems to suggest. If the latter, it seems unfair to me that Polt would face anyone other than the lowest seeded wildcard player to advance. Edit: The way Gretorp is talking makes it seem like the matches are set based on the graphic. This disappoints me a lot and makes no sense. | ||
|
Sabu113
United States11086 Posts
God hope Nani can make it. | ||
|
snorlax1
Singapore233 Posts
 | ||
|
YoungTyTy
United States801 Posts
On November 22 2012 11:49 Dexington wrote: Are the winners of the wildcard matches ordered again based on their wildcard seed before going in to the finals? Like, say Naniwa beats Oz. Would he go to face Polt, as the #16 seed, or would he go to play Arthur, like that graphic seems to suggest. If the latter, it seems unfair to me that Polt would face anyone other than the lowest seeded wildcard player to advance. Edit: The way Gretorp is talking makes it seem like the matches are set based on the graphic. This disappoints me a lot and makes no sense. That's how brackets always work. If the number 1 seed gives a walkover in the first round then the next opponent gets a really lucky matchup. It's like that in every sport that I've seen, except for rare exceptions where they reorganize by seed. That doesn't happen very often though. | ||
|
Dexington
Canada7276 Posts
On November 22 2012 11:59 YoungTyTy wrote: That's how brackets always work. If the number 1 seed gives a walkover in the first round then the next opponent gets a really lucky matchup. It's like that in every sport that I've seen, except for rare exceptions where they reorganize by seed. That doesn't happen very often though. No sport has wildcards to determine every single player/team's opponent. | ||
|
NASL.tv
699 Posts
On November 22 2012 11:49 Dexington wrote: Are the winners of the wildcard matches ordered again based on their wildcard seed before going in to the finals? Like, say Naniwa beats Oz. Would he go to face Polt, as the #16 seed, or would he go to play Arthur, like that graphic seems to suggest. If the latter, it seems unfair to me that Polt would face anyone other than the lowest seeded wildcard player to advance. Edit: The way Gretorp is talking makes it seem like the matches are set based on the graphic. This disappoints me a lot and makes no sense. The winners of the wildcards are re-ranked based off of their seed in the wildcards and then inserted into the playoffs based on that ranking(ranked 1-8). Polt faces whoever is the lowest ranked wildcard seed coming out of the wildcards no matter what, does that help? | ||
|
Dexington
Canada7276 Posts
On November 22 2012 12:03 NASL.tv wrote: The winners of the wildcards are re-ranked based off of their seed in the wildcards and then inserted into the playoffs based on that ranking(ranked 1-8). Polt faces whoever is the lowest ranked wildcard seed coming out of the wildcards no matter what, does that help? Perfect, thank you. Gretorp is wrong then. | ||
|
Dexington
Canada7276 Posts
| ||
|
PhoenixVoid
Canada32748 Posts
| ||
|
sitromit
7051 Posts
On November 22 2012 12:14 Dexington wrote: Naniwa has a good shot here, when was the last time Oz won a PvP? Few weeks ago when he 4-0'ed Naniwa at the MvP tournament? :p | ||
|
Ansinjunger
United States2451 Posts
| ||
|
biamila
Canada335 Posts
| ||
|
PhoenixVoid
Canada32748 Posts
| ||
|
Dexington
Canada7276 Posts
On November 22 2012 12:51 PhoenixVoid wrote: Ehh, I prefer a NaNiwa vs Polt series anyways, come on NaNi! I'd take Nani/Polt over Arthur/Oz any day. | ||
|
emjaytron
Australia544 Posts
| ||
|
PhoenixVoid
Canada32748 Posts
| ||
| ||
