• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 00:45
CEST 06:45
KST 13:45
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team TLMC #5: Vote to Decide Ladder Maps!0[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt1: Mile High14Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments2[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence10Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon10
Community News
StarCraft II 5.0.15 PTR Patch Notes193BSL 2025 Warsaw LAN + Legends Showmatch2Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups4WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments1SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia8
StarCraft 2
General
StarCraft II 5.0.15 PTR Patch Notes Team TLMC #5: Vote to Decide Ladder Maps! Why Storm Should NOT Be Nerfed – A Core Part of Pr #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time SC4ALL: A North American StarCraft LAN
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 19 Stellar Fest KSL Week 80 StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly)
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 492 Get Out More Mutation # 491 Night Drive Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense
Brood War
General
[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt1: Mile High BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Old rep packs of BW legends ASL ro8 Upper Bracket HYPE VIDEO BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro8 Day 1 [ASL20] Ro16 Group D SC4ALL $1,500 Open Bracket LAN BSL 2025 Warsaw LAN + Legends Showmatch
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Borderlands 3 General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread The Big Programming Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread UK Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Why can't Americans stop ea…
Peanutsc
Too Many LANs? Tournament Ov…
TrAiDoS
I <=> 9
KrillinFromwales
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1918 users

[NASL] Tie-Breaks/Wildcards Day 1 - Page 4

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
Blargh
Profile Joined September 2010
United States2103 Posts
November 22 2012 02:30 GMT
#61
On November 22 2012 11:27 Dexington wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 22 2012 11:23 Blargh wrote:
Wait, so, Vibe, Dark, and MMA all have +5 spread, but MMA and Vibe have to go through each other?? That seems like it's punishing the players who did better and just so happened to get the same spread. Shouldn't the people with lower spreads (+1) get booted instead of the tie-breakers between the two better players? And why doesn't Dark have to do a tie-breaker? Is it just completely random? This whole thing doesn't make any sense to me. Someone care to explain?


This is just for seeding, nobody is booted out.


Does that mean that even if Vibe loses to MMA, he will still be able in the wildcard bracket...?
BathTubNZ
Profile Joined December 2011
New Zealand2556 Posts
November 22 2012 02:33 GMT
#62
On November 22 2012 11:30 Blargh wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 22 2012 11:27 Dexington wrote:
On November 22 2012 11:23 Blargh wrote:
Wait, so, Vibe, Dark, and MMA all have +5 spread, but MMA and Vibe have to go through each other?? That seems like it's punishing the players who did better and just so happened to get the same spread. Shouldn't the people with lower spreads (+1) get booted instead of the tie-breakers between the two better players? And why doesn't Dark have to do a tie-breaker? Is it just completely random? This whole thing doesn't make any sense to me. Someone care to explain?


This is just for seeding, nobody is booted out.


Does that mean that even if Vibe loses to MMA, he will still be able in the wildcard bracket...?


Yeah, just a tie break for placement.
Blargh
Profile Joined September 2010
United States2103 Posts
November 22 2012 02:37 GMT
#63
On November 22 2012 11:33 BathTubNZ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 22 2012 11:30 Blargh wrote:
On November 22 2012 11:27 Dexington wrote:
On November 22 2012 11:23 Blargh wrote:
Wait, so, Vibe, Dark, and MMA all have +5 spread, but MMA and Vibe have to go through each other?? That seems like it's punishing the players who did better and just so happened to get the same spread. Shouldn't the people with lower spreads (+1) get booted instead of the tie-breakers between the two better players? And why doesn't Dark have to do a tie-breaker? Is it just completely random? This whole thing doesn't make any sense to me. Someone care to explain?


This is just for seeding, nobody is booted out.


Does that mean that even if Vibe loses to MMA, he will still be able in the wildcard bracket...?


Yeah, just a tie break for placement.

Oh, I see now. I saw Arthur/Oz once and assumed that each of the tie-breakers being played mean the loser is out of the bracket. Thank you for clarification.
NASL.tv
Profile Joined April 2011
699 Posts
November 22 2012 02:38 GMT
#64
On November 22 2012 11:30 Blargh wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 22 2012 11:27 Dexington wrote:
On November 22 2012 11:23 Blargh wrote:
Wait, so, Vibe, Dark, and MMA all have +5 spread, but MMA and Vibe have to go through each other?? That seems like it's punishing the players who did better and just so happened to get the same spread. Shouldn't the people with lower spreads (+1) get booted instead of the tie-breakers between the two better players? And why doesn't Dark have to do a tie-breaker? Is it just completely random? This whole thing doesn't make any sense to me. Someone care to explain?


This is just for seeding, nobody is booted out.


Does that mean that even if Vibe loses to MMA, he will still be able in the wildcard bracket...?



[image loading]
Dexington
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Canada7276 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-22 02:54:49
November 22 2012 02:49 GMT
#65
Are the winners of the wildcard matches ordered again based on their wildcard seed before going in to the finals?

Like, say Naniwa beats Oz. Would he go to face Polt, as the #16 seed, or would he go to play Arthur, like that graphic seems to suggest. If the latter, it seems unfair to me that Polt would face anyone other than the lowest seeded wildcard player to advance.

Edit: The way Gretorp is talking makes it seem like the matches are set based on the graphic. This disappoints me a lot and makes no sense.
"Man you guys are missing out waving your stats dicks about instead of watching this pvp" - bbm
Sabu113
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States11060 Posts
November 22 2012 02:55 GMT
#66
These between match bits are pretty funny.

God hope Nani can make it.
Biomine is a drunken chick who is on industrial strength amphetamines and would just grab your dick and jerk it as hard and violently as she could while screaming 'OMG FUCK ME', because she saw it in a Sasha Grey video ...-Wombat_Ni
snorlax1
Profile Joined April 2011
Singapore233 Posts
November 22 2012 02:55 GMT
#67
Oz loss another PvP
YoungTyTy
Profile Joined November 2011
United States801 Posts
November 22 2012 02:59 GMT
#68
On November 22 2012 11:49 Dexington wrote:
Are the winners of the wildcard matches ordered again based on their wildcard seed before going in to the finals?

Like, say Naniwa beats Oz. Would he go to face Polt, as the #16 seed, or would he go to play Arthur, like that graphic seems to suggest. If the latter, it seems unfair to me that Polt would face anyone other than the lowest seeded wildcard player to advance.

Edit: The way Gretorp is talking makes it seem like the matches are set based on the graphic. This disappoints me a lot and makes no sense.

That's how brackets always work. If the number 1 seed gives a walkover in the first round then the next opponent gets a really lucky matchup. It's like that in every sport that I've seen, except for rare exceptions where they reorganize by seed. That doesn't happen very often though.
Any fool can ask more questions than a wise man can answer.
Dexington
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Canada7276 Posts
November 22 2012 03:03 GMT
#69
On November 22 2012 11:59 YoungTyTy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 22 2012 11:49 Dexington wrote:
Are the winners of the wildcard matches ordered again based on their wildcard seed before going in to the finals?

Like, say Naniwa beats Oz. Would he go to face Polt, as the #16 seed, or would he go to play Arthur, like that graphic seems to suggest. If the latter, it seems unfair to me that Polt would face anyone other than the lowest seeded wildcard player to advance.

Edit: The way Gretorp is talking makes it seem like the matches are set based on the graphic. This disappoints me a lot and makes no sense.

That's how brackets always work. If the number 1 seed gives a walkover in the first round then the next opponent gets a really lucky matchup. It's like that in every sport that I've seen, except for rare exceptions where they reorganize by seed. That doesn't happen very often though.


No sport has wildcards to determine every single player/team's opponent.
"Man you guys are missing out waving your stats dicks about instead of watching this pvp" - bbm
NASL.tv
Profile Joined April 2011
699 Posts
November 22 2012 03:03 GMT
#70
On November 22 2012 11:49 Dexington wrote:
Are the winners of the wildcard matches ordered again based on their wildcard seed before going in to the finals?

Like, say Naniwa beats Oz. Would he go to face Polt, as the #16 seed, or would he go to play Arthur, like that graphic seems to suggest. If the latter, it seems unfair to me that Polt would face anyone other than the lowest seeded wildcard player to advance.

Edit: The way Gretorp is talking makes it seem like the matches are set based on the graphic. This disappoints me a lot and makes no sense.


The winners of the wildcards are re-ranked based off of their seed in the wildcards and then inserted into the playoffs based on that ranking(ranked 1-8). Polt faces whoever is the lowest ranked wildcard seed coming out of the wildcards no matter what, does that help?
Dexington
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Canada7276 Posts
November 22 2012 03:04 GMT
#71
On November 22 2012 12:03 NASL.tv wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 22 2012 11:49 Dexington wrote:
Are the winners of the wildcard matches ordered again based on their wildcard seed before going in to the finals?

Like, say Naniwa beats Oz. Would he go to face Polt, as the #16 seed, or would he go to play Arthur, like that graphic seems to suggest. If the latter, it seems unfair to me that Polt would face anyone other than the lowest seeded wildcard player to advance.

Edit: The way Gretorp is talking makes it seem like the matches are set based on the graphic. This disappoints me a lot and makes no sense.


The winners of the wildcards are re-ranked based off of their seed in the wildcards and then inserted into the playoffs based on that ranking(ranked 1-8). Polt faces whoever is the lowest ranked wildcard seed coming out of the wildcards no matter what, does that help?


Perfect, thank you. Gretorp is wrong then.
"Man you guys are missing out waving your stats dicks about instead of watching this pvp" - bbm
Dexington
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Canada7276 Posts
November 22 2012 03:14 GMT
#72
Naniwa has a good shot here, when was the last time Oz won a PvP?
"Man you guys are missing out waving your stats dicks about instead of watching this pvp" - bbm
PhoenixVoid
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
Canada32742 Posts
November 22 2012 03:20 GMT
#73
I guess Oz isn't as cursed as he was in PvP.
I'm afraid of demented knife-wielding escaped lunatic libertarian zombie mutants
sitromit
Profile Joined June 2011
7051 Posts
November 22 2012 03:31 GMT
#74
On November 22 2012 12:14 Dexington wrote:
Naniwa has a good shot here, when was the last time Oz won a PvP?


Few weeks ago when he 4-0'ed Naniwa at the MvP tournament? :p
Ansinjunger
Profile Joined November 2010
United States2451 Posts
November 22 2012 03:34 GMT
#75
Really nice Naniwa, tho a bit lucky with Oz's build.
biamila
Profile Joined September 2010
Canada335 Posts
November 22 2012 03:50 GMT
#76
Naniwa is hero mode :D
PhoenixVoid
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
Canada32742 Posts
November 22 2012 03:51 GMT
#77
Ehh, I prefer a NaNiwa vs Polt series anyways, come on NaNi!
I'm afraid of demented knife-wielding escaped lunatic libertarian zombie mutants
Dexington
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Canada7276 Posts
November 22 2012 03:57 GMT
#78
On November 22 2012 12:51 PhoenixVoid wrote:
Ehh, I prefer a NaNiwa vs Polt series anyways, come on NaNi!


I'd take Nani/Polt over Arthur/Oz any day.
"Man you guys are missing out waving your stats dicks about instead of watching this pvp" - bbm
emjaytron
Profile Joined June 2011
Australia544 Posts
November 22 2012 04:00 GMT
#79
are they playing cross server the micro has been really poor so far
Grubby - SaSe - Oz - Hero
PhoenixVoid
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
Canada32742 Posts
November 22 2012 04:06 GMT
#80
So if I recall correctly, winner of Oz vs NaNiwa faces Polt in Ro16?
I'm afraid of demented knife-wielding escaped lunatic libertarian zombie mutants
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 5h 15m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
NeuroSwarm 142
Nina 102
trigger 23
StarCraft: Brood War
Leta 500
Dewaltoss 149
Noble 38
Bale 20
Icarus 9
ToSsGirL 7
League of Legends
JimRising 811
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K597
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor146
Other Games
summit1g10034
C9.Mang0329
Maynarde133
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick628
BasetradeTV49
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH303
• davetesta57
• practicex 35
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• Diggity6
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
League of Legends
• Rush1309
• Stunt439
• HappyZerGling89
Upcoming Events
Afreeca Starleague
5h 15m
Barracks vs Mini
Wardi Open
6h 15m
Monday Night Weeklies
11h 15m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 5h
Afreeca Starleague
1d 5h
Snow vs EffOrt
PiGosaur Monday
1d 19h
LiuLi Cup
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
Maestros of the Game
5 days
Clem vs Reynor
[ Show More ]
[BSL 2025] Weekly
5 days
[BSL 2025] Weekly
5 days
BSL Team Wars
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
RSL Revival: Season 2
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
Maestros of the Game
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

IPSL Winter 2025-26
SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL 21 Team A
BSL Season 21
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
EC S1
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.