|
699 Posts
Thursday, Nov 22 1:00am GMT (GMT+00:00)
EU: Thursday, Nov 22 5:00pm GMT (GMT+00:00)
|
Sennnnnnnnnnnn! NaNi + MaNa hwaiting! ViBE is in for a tough spot facing MMA :S My weeknights were empty without you NASL, your hilarious segments were truly missed <3
|
Sheth vs hero and sen vs zenio honestly look really good. I love the TL players characters, and hero is good but has confidence problems, sheth has been known to beat koreans(mostly terrans though), and zenio in an interview says he likes to use strategy cuz he thinks zerg is weak....and sen is a "foreigner"(taiwan is still oriental...) that kicks butt. I want to see which of these frames of thinking and personalities succeed.
|
FFFFFF what the hell Stephano. This is at least the second time he has forfeited a match against MMA. Goddamn you.
Anyway, these matches are all sweet as hell.
|
Holy crap conflicting information from a couple weeks ago. Time to fix LP for the millionth time.
|
Wait, Sen was ahead of both Arthur and Oz in map score by 2 points. This Bo1 tie breaker between Oz and Arthur is going to count as a whole extra match point, as opposed to simply a map score point? 'Cos otherwise Sen would still be ahead in map score than the two protoss players.
|
699 Posts
On November 20 2012 12:02 Hier wrote:
Wait, Sen was ahead of both Arthur and Oz in map score by 2 points. This Bo1 tie breaker between Oz and Arthur is going to count as a whole extra match point, as opposed to simply a map score point? 'Cos otherwise Sen would still be ahead in map score than the two protoss players.
Oh, woops... Forgot to put that in the post. Bottom 2 2nd place finishers are top seeds in the wildcards. Need to fix the graphic :X
Edit: Updated, that should be a bit more clearer.
|
How does Naniwa get the last spot? There are 5 players ahead of him and one other tied with him.
|
So Polt faces the winner of Arthur/Oz vs NaNiwa?
Either way, I like the odds for Polt.
|
On November 20 2012 12:09 PhoenixVoid wrote:
So Polt faces the winner of Arthur vs NaNiwa?
I assume they are reordered by record after the wildcards and Polt would get the lowest seeded player.
|
699 Posts
On November 20 2012 12:09 Dexington wrote:
How does Naniwa get the last spot? There are 5 players ahead of him and one other tied with him.
Whoever re-updated Liquipedia has it wrong. Naniwa got the walkover over Select, not the other way around. Also, might want to recalculate Select points too. 
|
On November 20 2012 12:07 NASL.tv wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2012 12:02 Hier wrote:
Wait, Sen was ahead of both Arthur and Oz in map score by 2 points. This Bo1 tie breaker between Oz and Arthur is going to count as a whole extra match point, as opposed to simply a map score point? 'Cos otherwise Sen would still be ahead in map score than the two protoss players. Oh, woops... Forgot to put that in the post. Bottom 2 2nd place finishers are top seeds in the wildcards. Need to fix the graphic :X
Oh, I misinterpreted the rules, I assumed that any 3 non-first place finishers would be eligible to go through to the final bracket based on their score alone, but apparently it applies only to the 3 best 2nd place finishers.
|
699 Posts
On November 20 2012 12:18 Hier wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2012 12:07 NASL.tv wrote:On November 20 2012 12:02 Hier wrote:
Wait, Sen was ahead of both Arthur and Oz in map score by 2 points. This Bo1 tie breaker between Oz and Arthur is going to count as a whole extra match point, as opposed to simply a map score point? 'Cos otherwise Sen would still be ahead in map score than the two protoss players. Oh, woops... Forgot to put that in the post. Bottom 2 2nd place finishers are top seeds in the wildcards. Need to fix the graphic :X Oh, I misinterpreted the rules, I assumed that any 3 non-first place finishers would be eligible to go through to the final bracket based on their score alone, but apparently it applies only to the 3 best 2nd place finishers.
It got a little hazy in communication earlier, but I can say with confidence that the way it is now is the correct way.
|
I distinctly remember the broadcast the day Select vs Naniwa was supposed to happen. Select was there, Naniwa wasn't. Naniwa complained on Twitter that he was told Select got the walkover, even though he agreed to a reschedule or something like that.
|
On November 20 2012 12:27 Dexington wrote:
I distinctly remember the broadcast the day Select vs Naniwa was supposed to happen. Select was there, Naniwa wasn't. Naniwa complained on Twitter that he was told Select got the walkover, even though he agreed to a reschedule or something like that.
There was an agreement for a reschedule in the end and SeleCT ended up not showing up (because he was still in limbo on whether or not to finish out NASL).
+ Show Spoiler +Alan's Picks![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/qU34P.png)  NaNiwa: Maecenas dolor sem, gravida vitae rutrum nec, viverra et felis. Vivamus dapibus, quam non laoreet varius, felis elit vulputate dui, eget pulvinar mauris eros non eros. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Pellentesque purus mauris, sollicitudin et commodo vel, dignissim quis urna. Mauris elementum augue eu sapien cursus eleifend.  IdrA: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam non velit enim, sed tristique risus. Donec adipiscing scelerisque nisl sed porttitor. Duis sit amet turpis ac nulla interdum mattis et ac dui. Vestibulum quis magna quis eros sollicitudin feugiat. iNcontroL: Maecenas dolor sem, gravida vitae rutrum nec, viverra et felis. Vivamus dapibus, quam non laoreet varius, felis elit vulputate dui, eget pulvinar mauris eros non eros. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Pellentesque purus mauris, sollicitudin et commodo vel, dignissim quis urna. Mauris elementum augue eu sapien cursus eleifend. Stephano: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam non velit enim, sed tristique risus. Donec adipiscing scelerisque nisl sed porttitor. Duis sit amet turpis ac nulla interdum mattis et ac dui. Vestibulum quis magna quis eros sollicitudin feugiat. HerO: Maecenas dolor sem, gravida vitae rutrum nec, viverra et felis. Vivamus dapibus, quam non laoreet varius, felis elit vulputate dui, eget pulvinar mauris eros non eros. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Pellentesque purus mauris, sollicitudin et commodo vel, dignissim quis urna. Mauris elementum augue eu sapien cursus eleifend. viOlet: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam non velit enim, sed tristique risus. Donec adipiscing scelerisque nisl sed porttitor. Duis sit amet turpis ac nulla interdum mattis et ac dui. Vestibulum quis magna quis eros sollicitudin feugiat.
|
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
This is pretty funny. Sen and Zenio have met each other in all 3 NASL's. Should be a good match.
|
On November 20 2012 12:41 stuchiu wrote:
This is pretty funny. Sen and Zenio have met each other in all 3 NASL's. Should be a good match.
It was certainly one of the craziest match up's last season, lets see if Zenio can bring it again this time.
|
Oh god another Zenio vs. Sen bo5... Hopefully it isn't a 3-4 hour series like last season...
Also you can add  next to Arthur/Oz vs. NaNiwa... They're both Protoss...
and if TSL beats MVP in GSTL this week your #1 and #2 seeds in the playoffs Polt & HyuN might not make it to the playoffs due to conflicting schedules with the GSTL finals...
|
why is sen in wildcards? wiki says he was top 16?
|
On November 20 2012 13:21 Doraemon wrote:
why is sen in wildcards? wiki says he was top 16?
It shouldn't. I changed that a few hours ago.
|
Canada16217 Posts
hero vs sheth teamkill 
|
On November 20 2012 13:21 Doraemon wrote:
why is sen in wildcards? wiki says he was top 16?
Liquipedia said that the top 8 overall records qualify for playoffs, but the NASL system states that the top division leaders and the top 3 2nd place finishers will get the 8 spots.
Sen got le screwed by a couple maps Well, that and not showing up to his match against Demuslim haha
|
Is Dark going to have to drop out due to joining SKT T1?
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
hey, nice, didn't realise we got up to this stage already :o
|
On November 20 2012 13:13 Elite_ wrote:
and if TSL beats MVP in GSTL this week your #1 and #2 seeds in the playoffs Polt & HyuN might not make it to the playoffs due to conflicting schedules with the GSTL finals...
Oh Balls.
|
Go Zenio! Hope he makes it to the Round of 16, he deserves to get some attention again.
|
Tie-breaks best of 1 ? lol
After fighting all season you only get a best of 1 in tie-break situation ? That is a real coin-flip and not what the players deserve.
|
On November 20 2012 12:32 Killerhands wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2012 12:27 Dexington wrote:
I distinctly remember the broadcast the day Select vs Naniwa was supposed to happen. Select was there, Naniwa wasn't. Naniwa complained on Twitter that he was told Select got the walkover, even though he agreed to a reschedule or something like that. There was an agreement for a reschedule in the end and SeleCT ended up not showing up (because he was still in limbo on whether or not to finish out NASL).
Being old teammates I wouldn't be surprised if Select helped out Nani a little here by not showing up since he was retiring anyway
|
Sen is going to beat Zenio again =D! Can't believe they match each other every single season.
Also, Liquipedia is not correct a lot of the time
|
On November 20 2012 15:39 Parcelleus wrote:
Tie-breaks best of 1 ? lol
After fighting all season you only get a best of 1 in tie-break situation ? That is a real coin-flip and not what the players deserve.
It's not like they fall out of the season if they lose... the bo1's are only to determine their wildcard seeds...
|
On November 20 2012 15:39 Parcelleus wrote:
Tie-breaks best of 1 ? lol
After fighting all season you only get a best of 1 in tie-break situation ? That is a real coin-flip and not what the players deserve.
Map score breaks ties. When Map Score is tied it only takes 1 map to break that tie. The tie breakers just decide who gets what Seed #
|
On November 20 2012 15:46 Xeris wrote:
Also, Liquipedia is not correct a lot of the time
Indeed, especially when the show itself broadcasts the wrong result for 5 weeks.
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On November 20 2012 15:39 Parcelleus wrote:
Tie-breaks best of 1 ? lol
After fighting all season you only get a best of 1 in tie-break situation ? That is a real coin-flip and not what the players deserve.
i think arthur/oz deserves more than a bo1 for a tiebreak. the others are just for seeding so it's ok, but arthur-oz is for an entire round's jump
|
Sen vs Zenio last time was really nice. Looking forward to it. Sadly HerO gets a teamkill again.
|
On November 20 2012 17:54 CrazyBirdman wrote:
Sen vs Zenio last time was really nice. Looking forward to it. Sadly HerO gets a teamkill again.
You say this as if HerO has had to teamkill in NASL outside of division play before...
|
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
Sen vs Zenio last season was one of the best ZvZ's ever played
Unfortunately for Zenio he hasn't looked very good since then, while Sen is just awesome
|
On November 20 2012 17:56 Elite_ wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2012 17:54 CrazyBirdman wrote:
Sen vs Zenio last time was really nice. Looking forward to it. Sadly HerO gets a teamkill again. You say this as if HerO has had to teamkill in NASL outside of division play before...
Not NASL but HerO in general he often kicks his foreign teammates out of tournaments.
|
Obligatory seasonal Sen and Zenio GIF:
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/2Tset.gif)
|
On November 20 2012 17:06 BathTubNZ wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2012 15:46 Xeris wrote:
Also, Liquipedia is not correct a lot of the time
Indeed, especially when the show itself broadcasts the wrong result for 5 weeks.
And when we are given the wrong information for weeks in the live report thread.
|
Well Sen is going to utterly destroy Zenio ... again :D
Ah how i remember that cute waving hand in that booth after Zenio's taunt.
|
Wow just noticed SortOf's run in the open tournament, pretty sick results. Sad that he has to face Mana though, kinda want both to win =/
Also, nani fighting!
|
|
|
Good luck ACER | MMA for your first match under the green uniform
|
|
|
Are that games playing live? Im asking because i saw some mana vs sortof games few days ago in their games history
|
On November 22 2012 01:35 BlueRain387 wrote:
Are that games playing live? Im asking because i saw some mana vs sortof games few days ago in their games history
The games are not played live
|
Yeah, the misinformation came straight from the source. If liquipedia is wrong, it's because we were led astray.
|
699 Posts
Updated thread with bracket that's easier to read.
|
On November 22 2012 01:35 BlueRain387 wrote:
Are that games playing live? Im asking because i saw some mana vs sortof games few days ago in their games history
I'm pretty sure MMA & Sortof couldn't meet up until the Offline round of 8 at the earliest anyway.
|
On November 22 2012 07:43 BathTubNZ wrote:Show nested quote +On November 22 2012 01:35 BlueRain387 wrote:
Are that games playing live? Im asking because i saw some mana vs sortof games few days ago in their games history I'm pretty sure MMA & Sortof couldn't meet up until the Offline round of 8 at the earliest anyway.
He said Mana 
|
On November 22 2012 08:11 Dexington wrote:Show nested quote +On November 22 2012 07:43 BathTubNZ wrote:On November 22 2012 01:35 BlueRain387 wrote:
Are that games playing live? Im asking because i saw some mana vs sortof games few days ago in their games history I'm pretty sure MMA & Sortof couldn't meet up until the Offline round of 8 at the earliest anyway. He said Mana
Hah wow, reading fail on my part.
|
|
|
Whoa. What's this fancy stuff?
|
Celebrate SC2 with some turkey.
|
Umm the graphic in OP shows the winner playing Huk and the loser playing Alicia.
|
Nice timing on the Rax lift, saved the SCV, killed the Lings and blocked the Roaches.
|
Wait, so, Vibe, Dark, and MMA all have +5 spread, but MMA and Vibe have to go through each other?? That seems like it's punishing the players who did better and just so happened to get the same spread. Shouldn't the people with lower spreads (+1) get booted instead of the tie-breakers between the two better players? And why doesn't Dark have to do a tie-breaker? Is it just completely random? This whole thing doesn't make any sense to me. Someone care to explain?
|
Maybe not the MMA we knew from 2011, but still a strong TvZ showing compared to what we saw in mid 2012.
LOL PUMA PICTURE
|
On November 22 2012 11:23 Blargh wrote:
Wait, so, Vibe, Dark, and MMA all have +5 spread, but MMA and Vibe have to go through each other?? That seems like it's punishing the players who did better and just so happened to get the same spread. Shouldn't the people with lower spreads (+1) get booted instead of the tie-breakers between the two better players? And why doesn't Dark have to do a tie-breaker? Is it just completely random? This whole thing doesn't make any sense to me. Someone care to explain?
This is just for seeding, nobody is booted out.
|
MMA just made Vibe look like a diamond player ;o
|
On November 22 2012 11:27 Dexington wrote:Show nested quote +On November 22 2012 11:23 Blargh wrote:
Wait, so, Vibe, Dark, and MMA all have +5 spread, but MMA and Vibe have to go through each other?? That seems like it's punishing the players who did better and just so happened to get the same spread. Shouldn't the people with lower spreads (+1) get booted instead of the tie-breakers between the two better players? And why doesn't Dark have to do a tie-breaker? Is it just completely random? This whole thing doesn't make any sense to me. Someone care to explain? This is just for seeding, nobody is booted out.
Does that mean that even if Vibe loses to MMA, he will still be able in the wildcard bracket...?
|
On November 22 2012 11:30 Blargh wrote:Show nested quote +On November 22 2012 11:27 Dexington wrote:On November 22 2012 11:23 Blargh wrote:
Wait, so, Vibe, Dark, and MMA all have +5 spread, but MMA and Vibe have to go through each other?? That seems like it's punishing the players who did better and just so happened to get the same spread. Shouldn't the people with lower spreads (+1) get booted instead of the tie-breakers between the two better players? And why doesn't Dark have to do a tie-breaker? Is it just completely random? This whole thing doesn't make any sense to me. Someone care to explain? This is just for seeding, nobody is booted out. Does that mean that even if Vibe loses to MMA, he will still be able in the wildcard bracket...?
Yeah, just a tie break for placement.
|
On November 22 2012 11:33 BathTubNZ wrote:Show nested quote +On November 22 2012 11:30 Blargh wrote:On November 22 2012 11:27 Dexington wrote:On November 22 2012 11:23 Blargh wrote:
Wait, so, Vibe, Dark, and MMA all have +5 spread, but MMA and Vibe have to go through each other?? That seems like it's punishing the players who did better and just so happened to get the same spread. Shouldn't the people with lower spreads (+1) get booted instead of the tie-breakers between the two better players? And why doesn't Dark have to do a tie-breaker? Is it just completely random? This whole thing doesn't make any sense to me. Someone care to explain? This is just for seeding, nobody is booted out. Does that mean that even if Vibe loses to MMA, he will still be able in the wildcard bracket...? Yeah, just a tie break for placement.
Oh, I see now. I saw Arthur/Oz once and assumed that each of the tie-breakers being played mean the loser is out of the bracket. Thank you for clarification.
|
699 Posts
On November 22 2012 11:30 Blargh wrote:Show nested quote +On November 22 2012 11:27 Dexington wrote:On November 22 2012 11:23 Blargh wrote:
Wait, so, Vibe, Dark, and MMA all have +5 spread, but MMA and Vibe have to go through each other?? That seems like it's punishing the players who did better and just so happened to get the same spread. Shouldn't the people with lower spreads (+1) get booted instead of the tie-breakers between the two better players? And why doesn't Dark have to do a tie-breaker? Is it just completely random? This whole thing doesn't make any sense to me. Someone care to explain? This is just for seeding, nobody is booted out. Does that mean that even if Vibe loses to MMA, he will still be able in the wildcard bracket...?
|
Are the winners of the wildcard matches ordered again based on their wildcard seed before going in to the finals?
Like, say Naniwa beats Oz. Would he go to face Polt, as the #16 seed, or would he go to play Arthur, like that graphic seems to suggest. If the latter, it seems unfair to me that Polt would face anyone other than the lowest seeded wildcard player to advance.
Edit: The way Gretorp is talking makes it seem like the matches are set based on the graphic. This disappoints me a lot and makes no sense.
|
These between match bits are pretty funny.
God hope Nani can make it.
|
Oz loss another PvP
|
On November 22 2012 11:49 Dexington wrote:
Are the winners of the wildcard matches ordered again based on their wildcard seed before going in to the finals?
Like, say Naniwa beats Oz. Would he go to face Polt, as the #16 seed, or would he go to play Arthur, like that graphic seems to suggest. If the latter, it seems unfair to me that Polt would face anyone other than the lowest seeded wildcard player to advance.
Edit: The way Gretorp is talking makes it seem like the matches are set based on the graphic. This disappoints me a lot and makes no sense.
That's how brackets always work. If the number 1 seed gives a walkover in the first round then the next opponent gets a really lucky matchup. It's like that in every sport that I've seen, except for rare exceptions where they reorganize by seed. That doesn't happen very often though.
|
On November 22 2012 11:59 YoungTyTy wrote:Show nested quote +On November 22 2012 11:49 Dexington wrote:
Are the winners of the wildcard matches ordered again based on their wildcard seed before going in to the finals?
Like, say Naniwa beats Oz. Would he go to face Polt, as the #16 seed, or would he go to play Arthur, like that graphic seems to suggest. If the latter, it seems unfair to me that Polt would face anyone other than the lowest seeded wildcard player to advance.
Edit: The way Gretorp is talking makes it seem like the matches are set based on the graphic. This disappoints me a lot and makes no sense. That's how brackets always work. If the number 1 seed gives a walkover in the first round then the next opponent gets a really lucky matchup. It's like that in every sport that I've seen, except for rare exceptions where they reorganize by seed. That doesn't happen very often though.
No sport has wildcards to determine every single player/team's opponent.
|
699 Posts
On November 22 2012 11:49 Dexington wrote:
Are the winners of the wildcard matches ordered again based on their wildcard seed before going in to the finals?
Like, say Naniwa beats Oz. Would he go to face Polt, as the #16 seed, or would he go to play Arthur, like that graphic seems to suggest. If the latter, it seems unfair to me that Polt would face anyone other than the lowest seeded wildcard player to advance.
Edit: The way Gretorp is talking makes it seem like the matches are set based on the graphic. This disappoints me a lot and makes no sense.
The winners of the wildcards are re-ranked based off of their seed in the wildcards and then inserted into the playoffs based on that ranking(ranked 1-8). Polt faces whoever is the lowest ranked wildcard seed coming out of the wildcards no matter what, does that help?
|
On November 22 2012 12:03 NASL.tv wrote:Show nested quote +On November 22 2012 11:49 Dexington wrote:
Are the winners of the wildcard matches ordered again based on their wildcard seed before going in to the finals?
Like, say Naniwa beats Oz. Would he go to face Polt, as the #16 seed, or would he go to play Arthur, like that graphic seems to suggest. If the latter, it seems unfair to me that Polt would face anyone other than the lowest seeded wildcard player to advance.
Edit: The way Gretorp is talking makes it seem like the matches are set based on the graphic. This disappoints me a lot and makes no sense. The winners of the wildcards are re-ranked based off of their seed in the wildcards and then inserted into the playoffs based on that ranking(ranked 1-8). Polt faces whoever is the lowest ranked wildcard seed coming out of the wildcards no matter what, does that help?
Perfect, thank you. Gretorp is wrong then.
|
Naniwa has a good shot here, when was the last time Oz won a PvP?
|
I guess Oz isn't as cursed as he was in PvP.
|
On November 22 2012 12:14 Dexington wrote:
Naniwa has a good shot here, when was the last time Oz won a PvP?
Few weeks ago when he 4-0'ed Naniwa at the MvP tournament? :p
|
Really nice Naniwa, tho a bit lucky with Oz's build.
|
|
|
Ehh, I prefer a NaNiwa vs Polt series anyways, come on NaNi!
|
On November 22 2012 12:51 PhoenixVoid wrote:
Ehh, I prefer a NaNiwa vs Polt series anyways, come on NaNi!
I'd take Nani/Polt over Arthur/Oz any day.
|
are they playing cross server the micro has been really poor so far
|
So if I recall correctly, winner of Oz vs NaNiwa faces Polt in Ro16?
|
|
|
|
|
On November 22 2012 13:06 PhoenixVoid wrote:
So if I recall correctly, winner of Oz vs NaNiwa faces Polt in Ro16?
If Oz won, he would take the highest wildcard seed and face Arthur. Naniwa won, and since he was seed #16, he takes the lowest wildcard seed and faces Polt.
Just as an example, say the following players win:
Naniwa
Dark
Puma
Mana
Sen
Huk
Vibe
Hero
They would be reorganized in the following order, based on their wildcard seeding
Dark
Sen
Vibe
Hero
Huk
Mana
Puma
Naniwa
Which would make (not in correct bracket order)
Polt vs Naniwa
Hyun vs Puma
Violet vs Mana
finale vs Huk
Taeja vs Hero
Demuslim vs Vibe
MC vs Sen
Dark vs Arthur
|
On November 22 2012 13:08 Dexington wrote:Show nested quote +On November 22 2012 13:06 PhoenixVoid wrote:
So if I recall correctly, winner of Oz vs NaNiwa faces Polt in Ro16? If Oz won, he would take the highest wildcard seed and face Arthur. Naniwa won, and since he was seed #16, he takes the lowest wildcard seed and faces Polt.
YESSS POLT VS NANIWA FINALLY
|
|
|
United States23455 Posts
Naniwa is tough, but seeing as Ryung could have been an alternative in a TvT, I think Polt will be fine.
|
nanipolt great matchup
|
|
|
I really like how Gretorp and frodan have developed. Liked how they dropped the fun mathfact.
Hero's warp prism play so much fun.
|
39 siege tank can break everything...
|
Nicely played. I didn't expect a 3-0 tbh.
|
Lol I knew when Frodan said he could "play anyone from Hyun to" he would list the only foreigner possible.
|
On November 22 2012 13:08 Dexington wrote:Show nested quote +On November 22 2012 13:06 PhoenixVoid wrote:
So if I recall correctly, winner of Oz vs NaNiwa faces Polt in Ro16? If Oz won, he would take the highest wildcard seed and face Arthur. Naniwa won, and since he was seed #16, he takes the lowest wildcard seed and faces Polt. Just as an example, say the following players win: Naniwa Dark Puma Mana Sen Huk Vibe Hero They would be reorganized in the following order, based on their wildcard seeding Dark Sen Vibe Hero Huk Mana Puma Naniwa Which would make (not in correct bracket order) Polt vs Naniwa Hyun vs Puma Violet vs Mana finale vs Huk Taeja vs Hero Demuslim vs Vibe MC vs Sen Dark vs Arthur
So if HerO wins, he will have to face Taeja for a spot at the Finals? Damn it...another TL teamkill....
|
On November 22 2012 14:34 ninjamyst wrote:Show nested quote +On November 22 2012 13:08 Dexington wrote:On November 22 2012 13:06 PhoenixVoid wrote:
So if I recall correctly, winner of Oz vs NaNiwa faces Polt in Ro16? If Oz won, he would take the highest wildcard seed and face Arthur. Naniwa won, and since he was seed #16, he takes the lowest wildcard seed and faces Polt. Just as an example, say the following players win: Naniwa Dark Puma Mana Sen Huk Vibe Hero They would be reorganized in the following order, based on their wildcard seeding Dark Sen Vibe Hero Huk Mana Puma Naniwa Which would make (not in correct bracket order) Polt vs Naniwa Hyun vs Puma Violet vs Mana finale vs Huk Taeja vs Hero Demuslim vs Vibe MC vs Sen Dark vs Arthur So if HerO wins, he will have to face Taeja for a spot at the Finals? Damn it...another TL teamkill....
No, this is just an example. Hero could face almost anyone other than Polt.
|
Holy crap Sen is crushing Zenio right now. His decision making is just on another level.
|
Come on Zenio, comeback time!
|
Sen is so sick at ZvZ. No wonder he was able to crush Curious at WCS.
|
Sen's got no tech in this game, don't see him winning.
|
Sen won pretty convincingly...
|
Zenio gets knocked out of NASL by Sen every single time.
|
On November 22 2012 15:24 Azarkon wrote:
Zenio gets knocked out of NASL by Sen every single time.
This is actually true. So funny
|
|
|
On November 22 2012 15:24 Azarkon wrote:
Zenio gets knocked out of NASL by Sen every single time.
Sen has actually played Zenio a total of 14 times in 4 seasons of NASL and winning every series...amazing.
|
damn, Sortof 3-0 over Mana, that is surprising.
|
On November 22 2012 16:53 Gatesleeper wrote:
damn, Sortof 3-0 over Mana, that is surprising.
Seems to be in shape. Looking forward to see what he can do in DH.
|
Damn, go Sortof, could we have an Wildcard make it to the Finals?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/4NI2r.png)
North American Star League Season 4![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/fTNyl.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/vUzbB.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/665.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/staff/motbob/vs.png)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/1934.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/flags/kr.png)
MMA < Entombed Valley > ![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/flags/us.png)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/3837.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/629.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/96.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/957.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/uh62b.png)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/GvapU.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/noimage.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/1614.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/flags/se.png)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/222.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/1301.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/1176.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/1903.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/flags/tw.png)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/1214.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/flags/pl.png)
![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/54oaL.png)
![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/2EZzf.png)
![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/bxYay.png)
![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/BaGlg.png)
![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/wLoH5.png)
![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/o7cXH.png)
![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/K7syL.png)
![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/smFu2.png)
![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/DHj99.png)
![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/90BMF.png)
![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/yOist.png)
![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/ZBODd.png)
![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/pzFH8.png)
![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/H5aP3.png)
![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/c9Jjn.png)
![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/ACfFY.png)
![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/LKllQ.png)
![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/Lv8YZ.png)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/1996.jpg)
