| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
starception
205 Posts
predictions: AZUBU.Violet > elfi SK.MC > Kas Mill.forGG > Vortix Sortof > Slivko then round of 8: ST_Bomber > AZUBU.Violet SK.MC > Nerchio Mill.ForGG < mTw.Supernova LG-IM_Mvp > SortOf Round of 4 (where it gets exciting because no more foreigners): SK.MC > ST_Bomber LG-IM_Mvp > mTw.Supernova Finalz: SK.MC > LG-IM_Mvp | ||
|
Leporello
United States2845 Posts
I know this isn't my first time pointing this out, but we used to ban people for crap like this, did we not? This term, "Patchzergs" is basically implying that the zergs who've had [limited] success lately are only successful due to some imbalance, and not by their own merit. It's underhandedly, in the snide roundabout way, insulting players while also insinuating some balance whine. It'd be garbage posting even in a balance thread, and this isn't even a balance thread. Really just disappointed. I know we all have our race-bias, but please have the self-awareness to not be a snide d-bag about it. | ||
|
bokchoi
Korea (South)9498 Posts
| ||
|
xrapture
United States1644 Posts
On August 18 2012 04:36 Leporello wrote: I know this isn't my first time pointing this out, but we used to ban people for crap like this, did we not? This term, "Patchzergs" is basically implying that the zergs who've had [limited] success lately are only successful due to some imbalance, and not by their own merit. It's underhandedly, in the snide roundabout way, insulting players while also insinuating some balance whine. It'd be garbage posting even in a balance thread, and this isn't even a balance thread. Really just disappointed. I know we all have our race-bias, but please have the self-awareness to not be a snide d-bag about it. There was a boom of European Zergs that no one ever heard of performing well after the patch. Coincidence or not, the term patch zergs just applies to the Zergs that have had success only recently. Stating MvP should beat Zergs that have not been dominant for long is not that bad of a statement. | ||
|
Qwerty85
Croatia5536 Posts
On August 18 2012 04:36 starception wrote: If all things go well, there will be a top 4 Korean bracket. predictions: Finalz: SK.MC > LG-IM_Mvp I don't think this is the likely scenario. Mvp is a born champion and he rarely loses in the finals... He has the balls to do whatever it takes to win, so I'm pretty sure that if he gets to the finals, he wins. You can never underestimate MC but he did lose a fair share of his finals, to Taeja, Puma, Seed etc. | ||
|
m0ck
4194 Posts
On August 18 2012 04:41 xrapture wrote: There was a boom of European Zergs that no one ever heard of performing well after the patch. Coincidence or not, the term patch zergs just applies to the Zergs that have had success only recently. Stating MvP should beat Zergs that have not been dominant for long is not that bad of a statement. MVP was mainly successful when terran was way OP. Does that make MVP the ultimate patch-player? | ||
|
Leporello
United States2845 Posts
On August 18 2012 04:41 xrapture wrote: There was a boom of European Zergs that no one ever heard of performing well after the patch. Coincidence or not, the term patch zergs just applies to the Zergs that have had success only recently. Stating MvP should beat Zergs that have not been dominant for long is not that bad of a statement. Coincidence or not, you don't have to invent a term for newcomer players centered around their race in a way that implies that they've been made OP by a very small patch change. If you really think players like Vortix owe their success to some patch, at least have the decency to say it plainly. | ||
|
Qwerty85
Croatia5536 Posts
On August 18 2012 04:44 m0ck wrote: MVP was mainly successful when terran was way OP. Does that make MVP the ultimate patch-player? If you mean that he continued to win despite terran getting nerfed with every single patch, sometimes even in the middle of gsl season, than yes, he is ultimate patch player  | ||
|
xrapture
United States1644 Posts
On August 18 2012 04:44 Leporello wrote: Coincidence or not, you don't have to invent a term for newcomer players centered around their race in a way that implies that they've been made OP by a very small patch change. If you really think players like Vortix owe their success to some patch, at least have the decency to say it plainly. you do know what website we're on right, lol? | ||
|
zYwi3c
Poland1811 Posts
On August 18 2012 04:36 starception wrote: If all things go well, there will be a top 4 Korean bracket. predictions: AZUBU.Violet > elfi SK.MC > Kas Mill.forGG > Vortix Sortof > Slivko then round of 8: ST_Bomber > AZUBU.Violet SK.MC > Nerchio Mill.ForGG < mTw.Supernova LG-IM_Mvp > SortOf Round of 4 (where it gets exciting because no more foreigners): SK.MC > ST_Bomber LG-IM_Mvp > mTw.Supernova Finalz: SK.MC > LG-IM_Mvp Funny, cuz i thought exactly the same. | ||
|
stratmatt
United States913 Posts
On August 18 2012 04:44 m0ck wrote: MVP was mainly successful when terran was way OP. Does that make MVP the ultimate patch-player? Lol not even true because he was winning against shit tons of other terrans in TvT in which the better player usually wins. | ||
|
Froadac
United States6733 Posts
| ||
|
Irre
United States646 Posts
 | ||
|
KalWarkov
Germany4126 Posts
 elfi <  viOletMC >  KasVortix > ForGGsLivko > SortOf----------- RO8: Bomber < viOletMC < NerchioSuperNova > VortixsLivko < Mvp------------ RO4: viOlet > NerchioSuperNova > Mvp----------- Final: viOlet < Mvp | ||
|
SilSol
Sweden2744 Posts
SortOf > sLivko ( will be hard tho ) gogo! | ||
|
Alryk
United States2718 Posts
On August 18 2012 04:44 m0ck wrote: MVP was mainly successful when terran was way OP. Does that make MVP the ultimate patch-player? MVP won GSL two seasons ago... | ||
|
pAzand
Sweden539 Posts
| ||
|
shepherdxoxo
Netherlands260 Posts
I'm going with SuperNova. Because he's so damn awesome and I'd like mTw to get a little bit of shine! | ||
|
ES_JohnClark
United States1121 Posts
When did head 2 head results get trumped by maps won? I love ESL and totally respect Carmac.. but this can't be right can it? And for those that do not think its a big deal.. it is. It sets a very bad precedent for other events. It should almost ALWAYS be head 2 head that decides a tie within a group or division. Am I missing something here? | ||
|
FuRRie
Belgium815 Posts
On August 18 2012 05:45 csn_JohnClark wrote: OK.. i have not had a chance to read much of this thread at all.. but has anyone pointed out how messed up Group B final results are? When did head 2 head results get trumped by maps won? I love ESL and totally respect Carmac.. but this can't be right can it? And for those that do not think its a big deal.. it is. It sets a very bad precedent for other events. It should almost ALWAYS be head 2 head that decides a tie within a group or division. Am I missing something here? ow, Violet should be top, true.. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Counter-Strike Heroes of the Storm Other Games Grubby2728 FrodaN2235 KnowMe339 Skadoodle137 C9.Mang0136 Sick108 UpATreeSC66 Trikslyr44 JuggernautJason16 ZombieGrub14 Codebar8 |
|
Korean StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
Map Test Tournament
OSC
[BSL 2025] Weekly
Safe House 2
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Map Test Tournament
OSC
IPSL
Bonyth vs Art_Of_Turtle
Razz vs rasowy
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
