EPT[WCS] South Korea Preliminaries Day 1 - Page 79
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Mioraka
Canada1353 Posts
| ||
stuchiu
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
| ||
|
o[twist]
United States4903 Posts
On July 22 2012 15:45 Wildmoon wrote: Despite Kespa's players great mechanic but SC2 is much faster paced than BW. this sounds like exactly the opposite of what i've heard | ||
|
bittman
Australia8759 Posts
| ||
|
polyphonyEX
United States2539 Posts
damn! | ||
|
Stanlot
United States5742 Posts
| ||
|
Asha
United Kingdom38149 Posts
Deserving qualifier. | ||
|
AxionSteel
United States7754 Posts
 Glad to see him qualify as he's one of the best Terrans around atm. | ||
|
Ksquared
United States1748 Posts
| ||
|
FireSA
Australia555 Posts
| ||
|
X3GoldDot
Malaysia3840 Posts
On July 22 2012 15:47 o[twist] wrote: this sounds like exactly the opposite of what i've heard sc2 is a faster game with more multitasking, bw is more about precision, decision, stratergy and mechanics | ||
|
bittman
Australia8759 Posts
| ||
|
Kergy
Peru2011 Posts
| ||
|
Wildmoon
Thailand4189 Posts
On July 22 2012 15:47 o[twist] wrote: this sounds like exactly the opposite of what i've heard If you have played both games you will know. Sure, BW is harder to play mechanically but SC2 is faster paced. | ||
|
Fanatic-Templar
Canada5819 Posts
On July 22 2012 15:47 o[twist] wrote: this sounds like exactly the opposite of what i've heard I've always found SC2 to be faster as well. Brood War requires more actions, but because of the better pathing you can move ground units around much faster than in Brood War. Just getting fifty units down a ramp would take tens of seconds in Brood War. | ||
|
vthree
Hong Kong8039 Posts
On July 22 2012 15:47 o[twist] wrote: this sounds like exactly the opposite of what i've heard The apm required for BW is higher. But is was mostly due to UI (control groups of 12, macro mechanics). But the speed of the fights themselves are much slower. That is why BW is much more back and worth. For SC2, 1 engagement can decide the game. | ||
|
aRyuujin
United States5049 Posts
On July 22 2012 15:47 o[twist] wrote: this sounds like exactly the opposite of what i've heard sc2 is much faster paced, meaning micro is a lot harder because the battles end so much faster. Units are also more efficient and smart. Haven't you ever played a game with like 2 control groups of dragoons going the wrong way past a crack or something? that doesn't happen in SC2, units stay close and kill everything. (the kespa guys agree) Macro is a lot easier, though, because they added MBS, automine, and unlimited control groups | ||
|
o[twist]
United States4903 Posts
On July 22 2012 15:49 Fanatic-Templar wrote: I've always found SC2 to be faster as well. Brood War requires more actions, but because of the better pathing you can move ground units around much faster than in Brood War. Just getting fifty units down a ramp would take tens of seconds in Brood War. that makes sense that the pathing would have that effect | ||
|
setzer
United States3284 Posts
On July 22 2012 15:40 AndAgain wrote: Funny that multitasking seems one of the Kespa players' weaknesses. It was supposed to be their biggest strength. I don't think you understand how hard it is to control armies everywhere across the map with a limit selection of 12. | ||
|
aznball123
2759 Posts
| ||
| ||
