|
Starting on Page 125, asking if people are ok will result in bans. |
Different cameras streaming at different bitrates ...
|
On June 19 2012 07:31 Fr33t wrote: God those seats look comfy They are! :D
|
watching incontrol on swedish television, well worth the wait:>
|
|
|
On June 19 2012 07:31 gedatsu wrote:Show nested quote +On June 19 2012 07:29 ZAiNs wrote: The last Dreamhack final was in a way bigger stadium, right? In a way bigger town.
It was the same town? It was the ice hockey arena ten minutes down the road, as far as I'm aware.
|
On June 19 2012 07:31 Caddy wrote: The 720p stream was lagging for me, but I switched to 720p+ and it seems to be OK. same
|
So much lag... Any alternative stream?
|
On June 19 2012 07:32 ZAiNs wrote:Show nested quote +On June 19 2012 07:30 TheRealPaciFist wrote:On June 19 2012 07:20 Fishgle wrote:On June 19 2012 07:19 JayJay_90 wrote:On June 19 2012 07:17 mordk wrote:On June 19 2012 07:15 MentalGNT wrote:On June 19 2012 07:10 Candadar wrote:On June 19 2012 07:09 Azarkon wrote:On June 19 2012 07:06 maartendq wrote:On June 19 2012 07:04 masterchip27 wrote: [quote]
Empirically league of legends has had a higher magnitude of livestream viewers than sc2 recently, at many events. So, I wouldn't be too sure about that theorycrafting. If a game is popular to play, and has a good competitive scene, people will watch.
Well, it's a free and relatively casual game, with in-game stream support (hint HINT, blizzard?). It's got a way higher playerbase than SC2 as well, again, because it is free to play. If SC2's multiplayer were suddenly F2P, we'd see SC2 player number surge! No, we won't. SC 2 started off with a player base of 1 million+ players in the NA. It's a tiny fraction of that - around 10,000-20,000 by my last log in to the NA server - who play online ladder matches. Competitive RTS games aren't that attractive to casual players, and it's the casual players who make up the bulk of MOBA viewers. MOBA Please stop using this term. It's fucking retarded. -The Society of People Who Undestand What MOBA Stands For Can you explain what it is then? First result on "MOBA" into google is a site about LoL strategy. Aren't LoL, DOTA, HoN etc. MOBAs? I'm not trolling. Genuine question. MOBA is a term coined by LoL developers iirc, imo the problem with the term is it doesn't describe AT ALL what happens in a DotA/LoL/HoN type of game, so I hate it. Multiplayer Online Battle Arena?? WTF is that?! There needs to be a term to describe that kind of games though. Give me a better one and I'm never gonna use moba again data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt="" Defense of the Ancients. Where each team defends their respective Ancients (bases). Quite simple really. ARTS - Arena Real Time Strategy fits because the genre grew out of the broader genre of RTS, through W3\ -- Incontrol hyping, finals will be soon... Gabe Newell is trying to coin ARTS as Action RTS, which is stupid and makes no sense.
Yah, since there are so many RTS's without action....
|
On June 19 2012 07:32 ZAiNs wrote:Show nested quote +On June 19 2012 07:30 TheRealPaciFist wrote:On June 19 2012 07:20 Fishgle wrote:On June 19 2012 07:19 JayJay_90 wrote:On June 19 2012 07:17 mordk wrote:On June 19 2012 07:15 MentalGNT wrote:On June 19 2012 07:10 Candadar wrote:On June 19 2012 07:09 Azarkon wrote:On June 19 2012 07:06 maartendq wrote:On June 19 2012 07:04 masterchip27 wrote: [quote]
Empirically league of legends has had a higher magnitude of livestream viewers than sc2 recently, at many events. So, I wouldn't be too sure about that theorycrafting. If a game is popular to play, and has a good competitive scene, people will watch.
Well, it's a free and relatively casual game, with in-game stream support (hint HINT, blizzard?). It's got a way higher playerbase than SC2 as well, again, because it is free to play. If SC2's multiplayer were suddenly F2P, we'd see SC2 player number surge! No, we won't. SC 2 started off with a player base of 1 million+ players in the NA. It's a tiny fraction of that - around 10,000-20,000 by my last log in to the NA server - who play online ladder matches. Competitive RTS games aren't that attractive to casual players, and it's the casual players who make up the bulk of MOBA viewers. MOBA Please stop using this term. It's fucking retarded. -The Society of People Who Undestand What MOBA Stands For Can you explain what it is then? First result on "MOBA" into google is a site about LoL strategy. Aren't LoL, DOTA, HoN etc. MOBAs? I'm not trolling. Genuine question. MOBA is a term coined by LoL developers iirc, imo the problem with the term is it doesn't describe AT ALL what happens in a DotA/LoL/HoN type of game, so I hate it. Multiplayer Online Battle Arena?? WTF is that?! There needs to be a term to describe that kind of games though. Give me a better one and I'm never gonna use moba again data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt="" Defense of the Ancients. Where each team defends their respective Ancients (bases). Quite simple really. ARTS - Arena Real Time Strategy fits because the genre grew out of the broader genre of RTS, through W3\ -- Incontrol hyping, finals will be soon... Gabe Newell is trying to coin ARTS as Action RTS, which is stupid and makes no sense.
Sure as hell makes more sense than the other term.
|
Why this videos couldn't be played during down time?
|
no lag for me on stream i feel bad for you guys getting lag =(
|
haha sick highlight video, one battle :D
|
KHAAAAAAAAAALDOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOR
|
|
Hey incontrol, just wanted to say you are doing such a great job over there. Keep up going & Thank you
|
oh shit i think this will be worth evry freakin minute we waited <3
|
awww, only the finals on the big stage is quite depressing to be honest
|
|
|
|
|
|